WEBVTT - Talking Tech 29th August 2023

0:00:33.450 --> 0:00:37.170
<v S1>Hello everyone. Welcome to Talking Tech. This edition available from

0:00:37.170 --> 0:00:41.340
<v S1>August the 29th, 2023. I'm Stephen Jolly. Great to have

0:00:41.340 --> 0:00:45.150
<v S1>you with us. Listening through maybe Vision Australia Radio associated

0:00:45.150 --> 0:00:49.680
<v S1>Stations of Australia or perhaps the Community Radio Network. There

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.380
<v S1>is also the podcast. The way to get that is

0:00:52.380 --> 0:00:55.620
<v S1>to search for the two words talking Tech and Danica

0:00:55.620 --> 0:00:59.160
<v S1>Noor commercially on a Tuesday afternoon just after it's been produced.

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.910
<v S1>Another option is to ask a Siri device or smart

0:01:02.910 --> 0:01:08.190
<v S1>speaker to play Vision Australia Radio Talking Tech Podcast. Vision

0:01:08.190 --> 0:01:12.600
<v S1>Australia Radio Talking Tech podcast. With me someone who can

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:16.260
<v S1>explain all this tech stuff really well. Vision Australia's National

0:01:16.260 --> 0:01:22.230
<v S1>Advisor on Access Technology, David Woodbridge. David, when we think

0:01:22.230 --> 0:01:26.040
<v S1>of Pacific Vision in Australia, those of us who use

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:31.740
<v S1>the blindness products think of blindness. Products consultant Sam Taylor.

0:01:31.830 --> 0:01:35.580
<v S1>Sam is no longer with Pacific Vision. He finished up

0:01:35.580 --> 0:01:38.280
<v S1>last Friday, the 25th of August. But the news isn't

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:38.940
<v S1>all bad.

0:01:39.420 --> 0:01:41.400
<v S2>No, it's not all bad because when you hear of

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:45.210
<v S2>these really excellent people vanishing, you think, Oh no, they're guys.

0:01:45.210 --> 0:01:48.630
<v S2>All that knowledge and experience and everything else. Well, I'm

0:01:48.630 --> 0:01:51.780
<v S2>actually very pleased to say that Sam Taylor is now

0:01:51.780 --> 0:01:57.300
<v S2>part of Vision Australia and he joins our excellent team

0:01:57.300 --> 0:02:03.630
<v S2>of assistive technology specialists at Vision Australia. So not only

0:02:03.630 --> 0:02:07.890
<v S2>can he help, quote Pacific Vision people, if you like,

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.250
<v S2>he can also help everybody else as well. So we

0:02:11.250 --> 0:02:14.970
<v S2>can freely talk about all the different products that Sam

0:02:14.970 --> 0:02:17.520
<v S2>also uses, because I've known him since he was at

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.250
<v S2>school and I know he uses a lot more products

0:02:20.250 --> 0:02:22.260
<v S2>than what Pacific Vision sells. And I guess the one

0:02:22.260 --> 0:02:25.770
<v S2>thing about Vision Australia is that because we deal in

0:02:25.770 --> 0:02:30.720
<v S2>all products from every supplier, then I really think that

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.100
<v S2>Sam's going to bring a huge thing to Vision Australia,

0:02:33.180 --> 0:02:37.620
<v S2>particularly in the areas of Braille and speech output devices

0:02:37.620 --> 0:02:41.010
<v S2>like the Sense Player OCR, but also things like the

0:02:41.010 --> 0:02:43.770
<v S2>Victoria Stream and all those other different types of products.

0:02:43.770 --> 0:02:46.560
<v S2>So I'm really, really happy to see him being part

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:47.670
<v S2>of Vision Australia now.

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:51.540
<v S1>Welcome, Sam, to Vision Australia and we wish Pacific Vision

0:02:51.540 --> 0:02:54.840
<v S1>well with filling what will be quite a large gap indeed.

0:02:55.800 --> 0:03:01.140
<v S1>An interesting item that you came across concerns batteries, particularly

0:03:01.140 --> 0:03:03.090
<v S1>the iPhone in the future.

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:07.170
<v S2>Yes. So this is one of the stuff that's coming

0:03:07.170 --> 0:03:10.710
<v S2>out of the European Union at the moment. Is there

0:03:10.710 --> 0:03:16.680
<v S2>sort of battery decisions in 2027 which everybody's going to

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.440
<v S2>start fighting with? So what it is, is that any

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:24.540
<v S2>electronic device should be able to have its battery changed.

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:26.940
<v S2>And what they're really talking about is consumer products. So

0:03:26.940 --> 0:03:29.310
<v S2>they're not talking about electric vehicles and that sort of stuff.

0:03:29.700 --> 0:03:31.770
<v S2>So what they're saying is you should be able to

0:03:31.770 --> 0:03:33.750
<v S2>use any commercial tool that you can buy in a

0:03:33.750 --> 0:03:37.860
<v S2>shop to change your battery. Now because Apple in particular,

0:03:37.860 --> 0:03:41.400
<v S2>but this also applies to Samsung phones as well and

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:46.200
<v S2>pixel phones is that these batteries are pretty much part

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.960
<v S2>of the whole system. I mean, you've got to use

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.930
<v S2>glue guns and special screwdrivers and everything else to even

0:03:51.930 --> 0:03:54.360
<v S2>try and get the battery out, let alone do it

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:58.140
<v S2>yourself as a non technician. In some ways I agree

0:03:58.140 --> 0:04:01.290
<v S2>with them because like you don't want battery waste or

0:04:01.290 --> 0:04:04.050
<v S2>like you and I talked before the show, Steven, half

0:04:04.050 --> 0:04:06.240
<v S2>a time when you get rid of your phone, you're

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.280
<v S2>really getting rid of it because one, you can't afford

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.590
<v S2>to replace the battery or the battery's dying, so you

0:04:10.590 --> 0:04:12.990
<v S2>buy a new phone. But wouldn't it be nice back

0:04:12.990 --> 0:04:15.660
<v S2>in the old days, remember that if you had a

0:04:15.660 --> 0:04:18.300
<v S2>phone and the battery was getting a bit woozy, you

0:04:18.300 --> 0:04:20.310
<v S2>could just pop that one out, pop a new one

0:04:20.310 --> 0:04:23.580
<v S2>in and off you go again. So I would like

0:04:23.580 --> 0:04:27.150
<v S2>the fact that Apple did something, wherever it's going to be,

0:04:27.300 --> 0:04:29.700
<v S2>will replace your battery for nothing. Because when I got

0:04:29.700 --> 0:04:32.490
<v S2>my battery replaced in my phone a couple of years ago,

0:04:32.490 --> 0:04:35.940
<v S2>it cost me just on $200. So maybe one way

0:04:35.940 --> 0:04:38.120
<v S2>they'll be able to wiggle out of it is to say, well, look,

0:04:38.130 --> 0:04:42.870
<v S2>we'll no longer charge for consumers. But remember, this is 2027.

0:04:43.500 --> 0:04:47.160
<v S2>It just got announced. And I'm sure most of the

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:51.330
<v S2>major manufacturers of phones and tablets remember and computers because

0:04:51.330 --> 0:04:54.420
<v S2>remember the MacBook Air and the iPad, again, the batteries

0:04:54.420 --> 0:04:56.400
<v S2>part of the whole unit. So I have a funny

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.160
<v S2>feeling we're going to see a lot of benefactors screaming

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.490
<v S2>and yelling with the EU about, no, no, no, we

0:05:02.490 --> 0:05:05.280
<v S2>possibly can't do this. So let's keep looking at that

0:05:05.310 --> 0:05:06.570
<v S2>over the next couple of years or so.

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.300
<v S1>Yes. Because it really will make a big difference to

0:05:09.300 --> 0:05:11.760
<v S1>the business models for those products.

0:05:11.790 --> 0:05:14.400
<v S2>Can I say for the famous quote, they won't be

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:18.360
<v S2>the thinnest iPhone or iPad Mac ever made, because you're

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.340
<v S2>probably going to have to make it bigger to be

0:05:20.340 --> 0:05:22.230
<v S2>able to cope with the fact that you want to

0:05:22.230 --> 0:05:23.490
<v S2>be able to remove the battery.

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:25.950
<v S1>And by the way, by then the iPhone will have

0:05:25.950 --> 0:05:28.620
<v S1>been around for about 20 years. It's gone quick, hasn't it?

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.620
<v S2>Oh, my goodness. Yeah. I wish you wouldn't have said that.

0:05:31.620 --> 0:05:32.700
<v S2>I'm starting to feel old now.

0:05:32.950 --> 0:05:37.990
<v S1>Tell me about the EU's Digital Services Act. More ramifications

0:05:37.990 --> 0:05:38.620
<v S1>from that.

0:05:39.090 --> 0:05:41.500
<v S2>Yeah. So this came into effect last week. So what

0:05:41.500 --> 0:05:45.850
<v S2>it basically says is that any major company that has

0:05:45.850 --> 0:05:53.260
<v S2>over 45 million users is responsible for the content that

0:05:53.260 --> 0:05:55.960
<v S2>is on their platform. So what they were really talking

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:58.630
<v S2>about in this article was what to do with ads.

0:05:58.870 --> 0:06:01.330
<v S2>But when you think about content as well, you've got

0:06:01.330 --> 0:06:06.940
<v S2>things like appropriate content for children, parental control, where you

0:06:06.940 --> 0:06:12.100
<v S2>can opt in and opt out of ads or data sharing,

0:06:12.100 --> 0:06:15.160
<v S2>which is one of the things that everybody's really concerned about.

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.010
<v S2>So again, I know it's, you know, part of the

0:06:18.010 --> 0:06:22.000
<v S2>European Union stuff, but this stuff always has global implications

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.960
<v S2>because you can imagine that major companies don't want to

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:29.830
<v S2>start filing with the EU. And hopefully for me in

0:06:29.830 --> 0:06:33.550
<v S2>particular as a parent and a granddad, it has implications

0:06:33.550 --> 0:06:35.260
<v S2>for the rest of the world. So to me, I

0:06:35.260 --> 0:06:38.290
<v S2>think this is a really good thing. It's really holding

0:06:38.290 --> 0:06:44.770
<v S2>up places like Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft to a set

0:06:44.770 --> 0:06:47.680
<v S2>of standards that just basically says, you know what is

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:49.390
<v S2>at the end of the day, you just can't do

0:06:49.390 --> 0:06:52.630
<v S2>what you feel like. You've got responsibilities. And if you

0:06:52.630 --> 0:06:54.610
<v S2>like it or not, tough luck. We're going to make

0:06:54.610 --> 0:06:55.030
<v S2>you do it.

0:06:55.390 --> 0:06:59.230
<v S1>A big driver around these changes, and particularly with the

0:06:59.230 --> 0:07:02.200
<v S1>battery story we were talking about earlier, is about the

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:06.610
<v S1>need to be more sensible with the materials we use

0:07:06.610 --> 0:07:08.620
<v S1>and recycling. ET cetera.

0:07:08.830 --> 0:07:10.840
<v S2>That's right. Both of them are really saying, you know,

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.780
<v S2>common sense with batteries and common sense with content.

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.620
<v S1>Google, apparently you can hum a song and it'll find

0:07:17.620 --> 0:07:18.280
<v S1>it for you.

0:07:18.700 --> 0:07:22.410
<v S2>Yes. So this is in beta on YouTube. So people

0:07:22.430 --> 0:07:25.630
<v S2>are part of this Android beta testing program. So remember

0:07:25.630 --> 0:07:29.710
<v S2>with like Shazam on iOS, you can actually let the

0:07:29.710 --> 0:07:32.830
<v S2>microphone slash Siri listen to a part of a song

0:07:33.340 --> 0:07:36.250
<v S2>or you can sing it and it will recognize that, Well,

0:07:36.580 --> 0:07:39.820
<v S2>Google has taken this one step further and you can

0:07:39.820 --> 0:07:42.760
<v S2>hum part of a song and it will recognize what

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:46.030
<v S2>you're humming. And I don't know about you, Steve, but

0:07:46.030 --> 0:07:50.560
<v S2>my musicality is absolutely awful. So I assumed if I

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.470
<v S2>hummed on it, no bananas in pajamas, it might have

0:07:53.470 --> 0:07:55.240
<v S2>a good idea of getting it. But I don't know

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.000
<v S2>about the fantastic hits on the radio. I don't think

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.600
<v S2>it'll work. But if anybody's on the beta team and

0:08:00.620 --> 0:08:03.460
<v S2>used it, let us know and email me at David

0:08:03.460 --> 0:08:06.490
<v S2>Dot Woodbridge at Borg and I'd be really interested to

0:08:06.490 --> 0:08:09.130
<v S2>see how you go with that humming technique. Yeah, good.

0:08:09.130 --> 0:08:13.000
<v S1>Luck folding phones now. Are they such a good idea?

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.670
<v S2>This was a good article on folding phones that I

0:08:15.670 --> 0:08:18.430
<v S2>found over the weekend because, well, it's really saying is

0:08:18.430 --> 0:08:21.700
<v S2>folding phones, even though there have been around for recently,

0:08:21.700 --> 0:08:25.510
<v S2>even smartphone technology for 4 or 5 years. I've had

0:08:25.510 --> 0:08:29.860
<v S2>folding phones before back in the early 2000. Part of

0:08:29.860 --> 0:08:32.230
<v S2>the problem with them in one one side of the

0:08:32.230 --> 0:08:36.220
<v S2>argument is that the hinges can get dust inside them.

0:08:36.220 --> 0:08:40.450
<v S2>Even though they open out the actual camera inside the

0:08:40.450 --> 0:08:45.790
<v S2>phone is reduced in size because the actual phone's too thin.

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:50.920
<v S2>And the third major thing is because it has to unfold.

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:54.910
<v S2>The battery in the phone is not that big. So

0:08:54.910 --> 0:08:56.830
<v S2>half the time you've got to charge it more than

0:08:56.830 --> 0:09:00.470
<v S2>once a day. On the positive side, particularly for us

0:09:00.470 --> 0:09:02.800
<v S2>as blind and low vision people, you can open the

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:04.750
<v S2>phone up to answer the call. You can close the

0:09:04.750 --> 0:09:07.840
<v S2>phone to hang up the call. And for everybody you

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.930
<v S2>can very quickly use the outside screen of the phone

0:09:10.930 --> 0:09:13.270
<v S2>because remember, it folds down and you've got this little

0:09:13.270 --> 0:09:15.850
<v S2>screen on the outside and you can use that screen

0:09:15.850 --> 0:09:18.670
<v S2>to quickly check a message or reply to a message.

0:09:18.670 --> 0:09:21.190
<v S2>You can check the time, the weather and do sorts

0:09:21.190 --> 0:09:24.970
<v S2>of very small things without actually having to open the phone.

0:09:24.970 --> 0:09:28.260
<v S2>So there's sort of good and bad points to it.

0:09:28.290 --> 0:09:31.510
<v S2>Also got my Z three flip, which I'm still happy about,

0:09:31.510 --> 0:09:34.720
<v S2>but I really, really want a flip phone from Apple.

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.290
<v S2>So maybe in 2027 as well. Steve I might have

0:09:38.290 --> 0:09:39.610
<v S2>a flip phone from Apple.

0:09:40.090 --> 0:09:42.850
<v S1>Yeah, I don't really get this, but there's a contention

0:09:42.850 --> 0:09:45.520
<v S1>that note taking apps don't make us smarter.

0:09:45.790 --> 0:09:48.820
<v S2>And I think what this article is really getting at

0:09:48.820 --> 0:09:52.000
<v S2>is that you can write down and keep links to

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:56.830
<v S2>the cows come home. But if you don't think about

0:09:56.830 --> 0:10:01.600
<v S2>what you're reading about or taking notes about, then you're

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:06.490
<v S2>not really using your thought processes as a fairly advanced

0:10:06.490 --> 0:10:10.690
<v S2>life form. Because what we're saying is that apparently was

0:10:10.690 --> 0:10:13.990
<v S2>it three decades ago, we used to spend a couple

0:10:13.990 --> 0:10:16.480
<v S2>of minutes looking at a screen or whatever else it

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.720
<v S2>might have been. Now we spend 47 seconds per screen

0:10:20.260 --> 0:10:22.780
<v S2>for us blind folks. We probably spend more time than that.

0:10:22.780 --> 0:10:24.730
<v S2>But the problem is what they kept saying is that

0:10:24.730 --> 0:10:29.830
<v S2>if you switch too many times doing multiple tasks, you're

0:10:29.830 --> 0:10:32.830
<v S2>not really being able to concentrate on any one task.

0:10:32.900 --> 0:10:35.780
<v S2>Any one time. So it's like that jack of all trades.

0:10:35.780 --> 0:10:38.660
<v S2>You do average on most things, but you're not really

0:10:38.660 --> 0:10:40.860
<v S2>going to be very good at one thing. So I

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.000
<v S2>this one, I like it because when I focus on

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.480
<v S2>a particular topic for talking tech, I try and read

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.510
<v S2>more about that topic while I'm thinking about it and

0:10:50.510 --> 0:10:53.210
<v S2>taking notes on it rather than going, Oh my goodness,

0:10:53.210 --> 0:10:56.090
<v S2>I've got to find these ten other articles. I just

0:10:56.090 --> 0:10:58.160
<v S2>focus on one thing at a time because it said

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.010
<v S2>in reality there was really no such thing as multitasking.

0:11:01.010 --> 0:11:03.050
<v S2>If you're switching every 47 seconds.

0:11:03.470 --> 0:11:07.490
<v S1>One of the old Twitter third party apps spring for

0:11:07.490 --> 0:11:10.120
<v S1>X as it now is still goes viral.

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:12.350
<v S2>I know. And look, I don't know how this thing

0:11:12.350 --> 0:11:14.750
<v S2>has survived because we know like things like Twitter riffic

0:11:14.870 --> 0:11:18.080
<v S2>went and all the other major ones that particularly blind

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.960
<v S2>and low vision people love. So I don't know how

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:25.910
<v S2>spring for Twitter has survived under the radar and it

0:11:25.910 --> 0:11:28.670
<v S2>hasn't yet picked up and told you, No, go away,

0:11:28.670 --> 0:11:31.190
<v S2>you're not supposed to be doing that. So remember the

0:11:31.190 --> 0:11:35.270
<v S2>developer of Spring for Twitter is also the developer of Moana,

0:11:35.930 --> 0:11:39.440
<v S2>for iOS and for Mac, and that works extremely well.

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:43.340
<v S2>So quietly, if you don't like the Twitter app on iOS,

0:11:43.370 --> 0:11:46.640
<v S2>go and grab a spring for Twitter and it's absolutely brilliant.

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.850
<v S1>What's the latest with Lego and Braille?

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:53.900
<v S2>This is really exciting. So we've had Lego bricks for

0:11:53.900 --> 0:12:00.500
<v S2>educators since 2019, so educators could get a whole box

0:12:00.500 --> 0:12:03.500
<v S2>of Lego that had Lego letters and numbers on it,

0:12:03.500 --> 0:12:07.100
<v S2>plus print, and they're all different nice colors as well.

0:12:07.220 --> 0:12:11.780
<v S2>And educators could use that to build in literacy literacy

0:12:11.780 --> 0:12:14.090
<v S2>into play with children, which is a great way of

0:12:14.210 --> 0:12:18.770
<v S2>improving literacy. But now what the Lego Foundation has done

0:12:18.770 --> 0:12:21.290
<v S2>is said, Well, now we're going to commercially sell this

0:12:21.290 --> 0:12:25.280
<v S2>to everybody on the planet. So if you're a parent

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.190
<v S2>with a blind or a low vision child going blind,

0:12:28.190 --> 0:12:30.920
<v S2>then you can use this as a literacy and as

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:35.330
<v S2>with all different types of Lego, it comes with instructions

0:12:35.330 --> 0:12:39.410
<v S2>or play instructions on how to incorporate Braille and it

0:12:39.410 --> 0:12:42.350
<v S2>really cool thing. Steve I think it's amazing you'll be

0:12:42.350 --> 0:12:45.650
<v S2>able to use Be My Eyes when the Lego bar

0:12:45.650 --> 0:12:47.780
<v S2>becomes available and probably in about the second week of

0:12:47.780 --> 0:12:53.060
<v S2>September to talk to Lego itself directly for support people

0:12:53.060 --> 0:12:55.460
<v S2>on how to use the Braille bricks. And I think

0:12:55.460 --> 0:12:57.530
<v S2>that is absolutely amazing.

0:12:57.710 --> 0:13:01.490
<v S1>Interesting things happening in the Bemis world with my eye

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:02.870
<v S1>out in the public beta.

0:13:03.290 --> 0:13:05.990
<v S2>I think we've been my eyes in particular it's watch

0:13:05.990 --> 0:13:09.530
<v S2>this space because they're adding so many specialist services. As

0:13:09.530 --> 0:13:13.370
<v S2>you said, the eye one you can contact Google Microsoft

0:13:13.370 --> 0:13:16.550
<v S2>via the Beam Eyes app. They are really becoming a

0:13:16.550 --> 0:13:20.720
<v S2>powerhouse for doing video support and I might add, for free.

0:13:22.340 --> 0:13:25.760
<v S1>The Apple event announcing the new iPhones and other bits

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.160
<v S1>and pieces. When do you reckon? In a couple of weeks.

0:13:28.460 --> 0:13:30.980
<v S2>I reckon in a couple of weeks. So I think

0:13:30.980 --> 0:13:34.040
<v S2>the second week in September, I normally give two weeks

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.610
<v S2>warning to journalists and mainstream media about when it's coming up.

0:13:37.610 --> 0:13:41.240
<v S2>Now as we go to air on Tuesday afternoon, there's

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:45.110
<v S2>a tentative suggestion that it may be on a Tuesday

0:13:45.260 --> 0:13:48.350
<v S2>in the second week of September. So hopefully by next

0:13:48.350 --> 0:13:51.950
<v S2>week Stephen will know 100%. But as with people follow

0:13:51.950 --> 0:13:55.370
<v S2>me on X or Mastodon, I'll certainly let people know

0:13:55.370 --> 0:13:56.810
<v S2>as soon as I find out anyway.

0:13:56.810 --> 0:14:00.890
<v S1>Yeah, so around the 12th, 13th, 14th, etcetera of September.

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.160
<v S1>Just before we go, a reminder of where people can

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.470
<v S1>find details of what we've been talking about in this

0:14:06.470 --> 0:14:08.030
<v S1>and previous editions of the program.

0:14:08.210 --> 0:14:10.340
<v S2>Indeed. So as always, you can check out my blog site,

0:14:10.340 --> 0:14:14.840
<v S2>which is David would be a dot podbean pad and com.

0:14:15.050 --> 0:14:20.270
<v S1>David would be our podbean pod b e n to

0:14:20.270 --> 0:14:21.200
<v S1>write to the program.

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:23.960
<v S2>You can write to me at Vision Australia where I work,

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:28.670
<v S2>as well as Sam Taylor at David Dot Woodbridge. How

0:14:28.670 --> 0:14:31.220
<v S2>it sounds at Vision Australia. Org.

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:35.780
<v S1>David Dot Woodbridge at Vision Australia. Org This has been

0:14:35.780 --> 0:14:38.930
<v S1>talking tech with me has been Vision Australia's National Advisor

0:14:38.930 --> 0:14:43.670
<v S1>on Access Technology, David Woodbridge. I'm Stephen Jolley. Don't forget

0:14:43.670 --> 0:14:46.580
<v S1>about Dad for Father's Day and there's always the vision store.

0:14:46.580 --> 0:14:48.890
<v S1>You can go to just a few days to go.

0:14:49.250 --> 0:14:52.220
<v S1>In the meantime, take care. We'll talk more tech next week.

0:14:52.220 --> 0:14:52.610
<v S1>See you.