WEBVTT - Talking Vision 786 Week Beginning 23rd of June 2025

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:18.920
<v S1>From Vision Australia. This is talking vision. And now here's

0:00:18.919 --> 0:00:21.000
<v S1>your host Sam Colley.

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:26.600
<v S2>Hello, everyone. It's great to be here with you. And

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.600
<v S2>for the next half hour we talk matters of blindness

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:30.640
<v S2>and low vision.

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:34.120
<v S3>Some of the organizations that we in Utopia talk to say, yeah, yeah,

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:36.800
<v S3>we test our stuff with Nvda, but they know what

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:38.839
<v S3>they can see on the screen so they know what

0:00:38.839 --> 0:00:41.439
<v S3>is happening and should come out. Whereas if you get

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:45.279
<v S3>somebody who relies on Nvidia, for instance, to run through

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.360
<v S3>as a new user, if you like, then that experience

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.680
<v S3>can be quite different from the tech person checking it.

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:53.680
<v S3>And they wrote it and they know exactly what's inside

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:55.040
<v S3>it and what to expect.

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:59.039
<v S2>Welcome to the program. This week we catch up with

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:03.560
<v S2>Andrew Archer from Intopia, who you heard there. Now Intopia

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:07.800
<v S2>has been involved with quite lengthy discussions with the Australian

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:13.400
<v S2>Human Rights Commission around a recent set of updated guidelines

0:01:13.399 --> 0:01:18.480
<v S2>regarding ways that digital resources can be made even more

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:24.520
<v S2>accessible for users with disabilities, including blindness and low vision.

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.559
<v S2>That conversation is coming up very shortly, so make sure

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:32.480
<v S2>to stick around. And then after that, you'll hear from

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:37.080
<v S2>optometrist Greeshma Patel, who's here to chat to us about

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:41.640
<v S2>an eye condition known as presbyopia, as well as some

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:46.560
<v S2>recent findings related to the condition. I hope you'll enjoy

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:54.440
<v S2>this week's episode of Talking Vision. In recent weeks and months,

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:58.720
<v S2>the Australian Human Rights Commission have updated their series of

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:05.210
<v S2>guidelines regarding best practices for digital accessibility, often aligning with

0:02:05.210 --> 0:02:10.130
<v S2>the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, but they go further than that.

0:02:10.130 --> 0:02:15.810
<v S2>They also focus on making digital content and experiences perceivable, operable,

0:02:15.810 --> 0:02:21.690
<v S2>understandable and robust for all users, including those with disabilities.

0:02:21.890 --> 0:02:26.330
<v S2>And one of the organizations that was central to giving

0:02:26.330 --> 0:02:30.210
<v S2>their feedback and insights on how to make the guidelines

0:02:30.210 --> 0:02:34.290
<v S2>as effective as possible was Intopia. And it's my great

0:02:34.290 --> 0:02:39.570
<v S2>pleasure to welcome Andrew Arch from Intopia, their principal digital

0:02:39.570 --> 0:02:45.050
<v S2>accessibility consultant, to Talking Vision. Andrew, welcome to Talking Vision.

0:02:45.050 --> 0:02:46.890
<v S2>Thank you very much for your time.

0:02:47.330 --> 0:02:48.530
<v S3>Thank you for inviting us.

0:02:49.010 --> 0:02:52.650
<v S2>Now firstly, Andrew, let's go to the heart of things

0:02:52.690 --> 0:02:56.810
<v S2>and have a bit of a chat about the guidelines themselves.

0:02:56.810 --> 0:02:58.730
<v S2>So tell us about the guidelines.

0:02:58.970 --> 0:03:03.210
<v S3>Guidelines have been updated by the Australian Human Rights Commission

0:03:03.210 --> 0:03:07.250
<v S3>because it was recognised that the previous version and we

0:03:07.290 --> 0:03:10.210
<v S3>were up to version 4.1, I think it was, um,

0:03:10.210 --> 0:03:14.330
<v S3>we're ten years, 11 years old now and their title

0:03:14.330 --> 0:03:17.570
<v S3>gives that away. They were called, um, access for under

0:03:17.570 --> 0:03:19.770
<v S3>the World Wide Web. We don't even call it the

0:03:19.770 --> 0:03:23.970
<v S3>World Wide Web anymore, just the web. But digital accessibility

0:03:24.010 --> 0:03:28.290
<v S3>has become all pervasive, or digital access has become all pervasive.

0:03:28.330 --> 0:03:31.650
<v S3>You know, we've got apps, we've got software, we've got

0:03:31.650 --> 0:03:36.130
<v S3>all sorts of social media platforms. Everything you do requires

0:03:36.130 --> 0:03:38.370
<v S3>you to have some sort of nearly everything you do

0:03:38.410 --> 0:03:41.090
<v S3>requires you to have some sort of digital access these days.

0:03:41.290 --> 0:03:43.650
<v S3>And so it was in recognition of that all pervasive

0:03:43.650 --> 0:03:47.890
<v S3>requirement for digital access that made the commission look at it.

0:03:47.890 --> 0:03:50.650
<v S3>It's time to update this from just the World Wide Web,

0:03:51.170 --> 0:03:54.010
<v S3>which is sort of where we got started with digital

0:03:54.010 --> 0:03:58.090
<v S3>stuff in many respects some decades ago to digital is everywhere.

0:03:58.330 --> 0:04:01.770
<v S3>That was the the driver for putting this update together.

0:04:02.010 --> 0:04:07.940
<v S3>And the commission approached us in late 2023. Well, they

0:04:07.940 --> 0:04:10.700
<v S3>put it out to tender and we were the people

0:04:10.700 --> 0:04:14.180
<v S3>who were selected to do that in late 2023 to

0:04:14.220 --> 0:04:18.300
<v S3>develop this update, which was released in April this year.

0:04:18.300 --> 0:04:21.020
<v S3>So it took about an 18 month time frame to

0:04:21.220 --> 0:04:24.140
<v S3>write those and go through all the consultation processes and

0:04:24.180 --> 0:04:25.380
<v S3>review processes.

0:04:25.700 --> 0:04:29.940
<v S2>Tell us a bit about those processes, Andrew, and specifically

0:04:29.980 --> 0:04:35.860
<v S2>your and Netapp's involvement with the composers of the guidelines

0:04:35.860 --> 0:04:39.779
<v S2>and with the Commission and your feedback and insights.

0:04:40.180 --> 0:04:43.700
<v S3>A couple of us in Intopia had been working on

0:04:43.700 --> 0:04:50.020
<v S3>a pro-bono version of this for a couple of years prior, primarily, um,

0:04:50.020 --> 0:04:53.060
<v S3>put together by a group of people, um, being run

0:04:53.060 --> 0:04:55.779
<v S3>by Greg Allchin from Service New South Wales. Some of

0:04:55.780 --> 0:04:59.020
<v S3>you listeners may know of Greg Olsen, and in fact,

0:04:59.020 --> 0:05:00.700
<v S3>you know, he'll be an interesting person for you to

0:05:00.700 --> 0:05:02.500
<v S3>get on board in terms of all the work he's

0:05:02.500 --> 0:05:05.380
<v S3>done inside the New South Wales Government to drive digital

0:05:05.380 --> 0:05:08.180
<v S3>accessibility there. Be worth a chat at some stage if

0:05:08.180 --> 0:05:12.620
<v S3>you get that opportunity. But the commission said we haven't

0:05:12.620 --> 0:05:14.580
<v S3>got a formal process here. We need to create a

0:05:14.580 --> 0:05:18.700
<v S3>formal process for updating the note rather than this piecemeal. Yes,

0:05:18.700 --> 0:05:21.300
<v S3>it might get done. Process. So we we had a

0:05:21.500 --> 0:05:24.980
<v S3>draft that we'd been participating in, um, to work with

0:05:24.980 --> 0:05:27.300
<v S3>when the commission decided it needed to go to market

0:05:27.300 --> 0:05:31.340
<v S3>to formalise the whole process. And Intopia was engaged to

0:05:31.380 --> 0:05:35.180
<v S3>write the document, basically. So we had a starting point

0:05:35.180 --> 0:05:37.780
<v S3>with that material that Greg Olsen had put together. But

0:05:37.780 --> 0:05:41.339
<v S3>we also worked with the commission to say, okay, what

0:05:41.340 --> 0:05:43.420
<v S3>did they want to see in it and how should

0:05:43.420 --> 0:05:47.099
<v S3>it be structured? So we were in fact, we ended

0:05:47.100 --> 0:05:50.420
<v S3>up drafting some of the earlier legal stuff as well,

0:05:50.420 --> 0:05:53.220
<v S3>but that went through a lot of internal review and

0:05:53.220 --> 0:05:57.460
<v S3>rewriting inside the commission, and we took responsibility to write

0:05:57.460 --> 0:06:00.180
<v S3>the more technical side, the more standard side, the more

0:06:00.180 --> 0:06:05.390
<v S3>how should organisations do this? So that process took, as

0:06:05.390 --> 0:06:08.550
<v S3>I said, 18 months overall. And so, you know, one

0:06:08.550 --> 0:06:10.150
<v S3>of the things that we did was we set up

0:06:10.150 --> 0:06:13.430
<v S3>some advisory groups to two different advisory groups, one looking

0:06:13.430 --> 0:06:16.790
<v S3>at the technology side and one looking at the impact

0:06:16.790 --> 0:06:20.510
<v S3>on the user. So we had a some representative user representatives,

0:06:20.510 --> 0:06:24.150
<v S3>people who relied on technology and having it accessible, as

0:06:24.150 --> 0:06:29.190
<v S3>well as some organizations that represented people with disability. So

0:06:29.190 --> 0:06:31.710
<v S3>we had people who sort of do the technical stuff

0:06:31.710 --> 0:06:34.230
<v S3>and people who rely on on the outcome of that

0:06:34.510 --> 0:06:38.030
<v S3>as two different technical advisory, two different advisory groups. The

0:06:38.030 --> 0:06:41.310
<v S3>commission was also inputting into the process, particularly, as I said,

0:06:41.350 --> 0:06:43.670
<v S3>on the legal side, but they were relying on us

0:06:43.710 --> 0:06:46.510
<v S3>and the advisory groups to sort of write the what

0:06:46.510 --> 0:06:49.030
<v S3>should be included, when should it be considered? We also

0:06:49.070 --> 0:06:51.910
<v S3>went out for a public comment at one point and

0:06:51.910 --> 0:06:56.430
<v S3>got quite some quite good feedback on that. Interestingly, some

0:06:56.430 --> 0:06:58.670
<v S3>of the comment that came back in the public feedback

0:06:58.670 --> 0:07:01.590
<v S3>was tell us exactly what to do. Well, these are

0:07:01.590 --> 0:07:04.910
<v S3>guidelines and we can't tell everybody exactly what to do,

0:07:04.950 --> 0:07:08.070
<v S3>they need to make that decision by themselves. But, you know,

0:07:08.110 --> 0:07:10.190
<v S3>that was one of the bits of feedback that was

0:07:10.190 --> 0:07:13.870
<v S3>interesting but not surprising to get. We went through probably

0:07:13.870 --> 0:07:18.750
<v S3>6 or 7 drafts overall throughout that process and some restructuring,

0:07:18.790 --> 0:07:21.310
<v S3>as we worked out better ways to present a better

0:07:21.310 --> 0:07:23.470
<v S3>order to present it. The commission had quite a bit

0:07:23.470 --> 0:07:25.910
<v S3>of input into that, and so we ended up breaking

0:07:25.910 --> 0:07:29.070
<v S3>it up into three different chapters. You know, one that's

0:07:29.070 --> 0:07:31.630
<v S3>more looking at the legal stuff, one that was looking

0:07:31.630 --> 0:07:34.830
<v S3>at the more broadly how to and then one that

0:07:34.830 --> 0:07:37.350
<v S3>final chapter that was looking at, okay, what are the

0:07:37.350 --> 0:07:42.870
<v S3>standards um, from standards Australia, from government, from industry and

0:07:42.870 --> 0:07:45.350
<v S3>other things that people should be looking at to adhere

0:07:45.350 --> 0:07:47.790
<v S3>to the idea of breaking it up into those three

0:07:47.790 --> 0:07:50.870
<v S3>sections was that we hope it as a modular set

0:07:50.870 --> 0:07:55.070
<v S3>of guidance. It can be updated more frequently. And, you know,

0:07:55.110 --> 0:07:57.310
<v S3>that's that's the problem with the law. Now, the law

0:07:57.350 --> 0:08:01.870
<v S3>doesn't mention because it's 1992 pre-digital pre-web, unless you happen

0:08:01.870 --> 0:08:04.600
<v S3>to be working in SRO, CSIRO or in university at

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:06.840
<v S3>the time. It's very hard to update the law. It's

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:09.960
<v S3>much easier to update guidance under the law. So the

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.200
<v S3>Commission is hopeful that it'll be able to keep this

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.560
<v S3>more up to date. The way that we structured this

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.840
<v S3>set of guidelines versus the way that the previous notes

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.760
<v S3>about the World Wide Web accessibility had been written. That's

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:22.280
<v S3>sort of the process that we went through.

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:28.320
<v S2>Fair enough. And Andrew, what's been the biggest advantages from

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:32.360
<v S2>Interpares point of view that have come out of the

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:36.640
<v S2>new iteration of the guidelines? What's been the most pleasing aspect?

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.439
<v S3>I think the way that we've called it out, because

0:08:39.479 --> 0:08:42.800
<v S3>a lot of people talk about the web content accessibility guidelines,

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:44.880
<v S3>which are sort of the international standard that we all

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.559
<v S3>start with and say, yeah, but that only applies to

0:08:47.599 --> 0:08:50.879
<v S3>online services to our websites and our web services. I

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.800
<v S3>think the big thing here is that through this, the

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.800
<v S3>commissioner has called out that this applies not just to

0:08:56.839 --> 0:09:00.800
<v S3>anything online with a browser interface, but to digital books,

0:09:00.839 --> 0:09:06.559
<v S3>learning materials, emails, games, mobile applications, even. You know, we

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:11.000
<v S3>call that things like two factor authentication, that type of issue. Um,

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:14.640
<v S3>virtual reality, you know, extended reality, augmented reality as we

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:18.160
<v S3>call it, digital wallets, anything that touches digital and has

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.559
<v S3>a digital interface of some sort to it through a

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:24.880
<v S3>screen is in scope of the DDA and calling that

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.240
<v S3>out so that people can't say, oh, the Web content

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:29.999
<v S3>Accessibility guidelines are just about web. Yep. Okay. We don't

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.080
<v S3>need to worry about them for this. So, you know,

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.400
<v S3>we're also getting, you know, organizations saying, you know, we

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:36.480
<v S3>also need to look at the stuff we've got internally

0:09:36.479 --> 0:09:39.679
<v S3>in our organization to support our staff, like the HR system,

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.759
<v S3>the payroll system, and so on. So that's that's some

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.439
<v S3>of the changes that we see being a big win

0:09:46.479 --> 0:09:47.400
<v S3>across the board.

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:50.439
<v S2>Andrew, I'd love to focus on a bit of a

0:09:50.439 --> 0:09:54.439
<v S2>blindness and low vision aspect. In particular, I want to

0:09:54.439 --> 0:09:57.920
<v S2>talk about the advances in things like jaws, things like

0:09:57.959 --> 0:10:02.730
<v S2>zoom text, things like Nvda, all those sort of magnification

0:10:02.729 --> 0:10:07.890
<v S2>screen readers, and also guidelines around alt text and image descriptions.

0:10:07.890 --> 0:10:11.530
<v S2>What's been the big things from that side of thing

0:10:11.530 --> 0:10:14.889
<v S2>that people can look forward to reading about more in

0:10:14.890 --> 0:10:19.290
<v S2>the guidelines, given the advances in 11 years, with all

0:10:19.290 --> 0:10:21.489
<v S2>those sort of little bits and pieces.

0:10:21.530 --> 0:10:24.129
<v S3>Oh, a lot of that software has come a long way,

0:10:24.250 --> 0:10:27.570
<v S3>and some of it's starting to use AI now, artificial

0:10:27.569 --> 0:10:30.569
<v S3>intelligence built into it, which is an advantage but also

0:10:30.569 --> 0:10:33.650
<v S3>a disadvantage. The other flip side of that is the

0:10:33.650 --> 0:10:37.849
<v S3>way that some organizations are using plug ins to try

0:10:37.849 --> 0:10:41.529
<v S3>and solve their accessibility problem, that rely on artificial intelligence

0:10:41.530 --> 0:10:45.329
<v S3>and artificial intelligence in that respect isn't mature enough. But

0:10:45.329 --> 0:10:48.410
<v S3>from the assistive technology side of it, you know, one

0:10:48.410 --> 0:10:51.449
<v S3>of the things that we're seeing and that we've emphasised

0:10:51.449 --> 0:10:54.729
<v S3>in this new guidance is that it's not just about

0:10:54.729 --> 0:10:57.890
<v S3>getting it technically right, it also has to work for users.

0:10:58.130 --> 0:11:02.569
<v S3>So making sure that people or encouraging strongly encouraging people

0:11:02.569 --> 0:11:06.770
<v S3>to undertake usability testing with people with. With disability who

0:11:06.770 --> 0:11:10.769
<v S3>are using assistive technologies. I mean, some of the organizations

0:11:10.770 --> 0:11:13.170
<v S3>that we in Edutopia talk to say, yeah, yeah, we

0:11:13.170 --> 0:11:15.809
<v S3>test our stuff with Nvda, but they know what they

0:11:15.809 --> 0:11:17.969
<v S3>can see on the screen so they know what is

0:11:17.969 --> 0:11:20.689
<v S3>happening and should come out. Whereas if you get somebody

0:11:20.689 --> 0:11:24.410
<v S3>who relies on Nvidia, for instance, to run through as

0:11:24.410 --> 0:11:27.730
<v S3>a new user, if you like, then that experience can

0:11:27.729 --> 0:11:31.130
<v S3>be quite different from the tech person checking it. And

0:11:31.130 --> 0:11:33.089
<v S3>they wrote it and they know exactly what's inside it

0:11:33.089 --> 0:11:35.770
<v S3>and what to expect from, you know, how the screens

0:11:35.770 --> 0:11:38.290
<v S3>were put together, how the text was written, how the

0:11:38.290 --> 0:11:40.490
<v S3>services are meant to be interacted with. They've got that

0:11:40.490 --> 0:11:43.050
<v S3>inside knowledge. That means that they're not testing it, even

0:11:43.050 --> 0:11:44.849
<v S3>though they might be running a screen reader over it.

0:11:44.849 --> 0:11:47.370
<v S3>They're not testing it to the extent that means that

0:11:47.370 --> 0:11:50.170
<v S3>it's usable by somebody. They just testing that. Yep. I'm

0:11:50.209 --> 0:11:52.809
<v S3>getting the right sort of output here from what I expect,

0:11:52.809 --> 0:11:55.849
<v S3>which is very, very different from doing usability testing. So

0:11:55.849 --> 0:11:59.090
<v S3>one of the things that the guidelines are saying also

0:11:59.130 --> 0:12:01.780
<v S3>is you've got to consider accessibility from the start of

0:12:01.780 --> 0:12:04.260
<v S3>a tech project. And you've got to make sure that

0:12:04.260 --> 0:12:06.979
<v S3>after you've got it technically correct, you've tested it, that

0:12:06.979 --> 0:12:09.179
<v S3>it's actually usable, and then you've got to make sure

0:12:09.179 --> 0:12:12.819
<v S3>that all your maintenance considers accessibility as well, because we've

0:12:12.819 --> 0:12:16.020
<v S3>always seen, you know, over time, you know, little tweaks happen,

0:12:16.059 --> 0:12:19.219
<v S3>pages get rewritten, an image gets changed, and the alt

0:12:19.260 --> 0:12:22.099
<v S3>text is not updated, for instance. Um, you know, it

0:12:22.099 --> 0:12:24.499
<v S3>still talks about on the florist site, the roses for

0:12:24.500 --> 0:12:27.739
<v S3>Valentine's Day, whereas they've changed it over to chrysanthemums for

0:12:27.740 --> 0:12:30.260
<v S3>Mums Day, but didn't change the the alt text saying,

0:12:30.260 --> 0:12:33.420
<v S3>you know, red roses versus white chrysanthemums, that type of

0:12:33.500 --> 0:12:36.540
<v S3>thing we're talking now about in these guidelines about the

0:12:36.540 --> 0:12:40.939
<v S3>whole entire length of the project from conception to maintenance

0:12:40.939 --> 0:12:44.620
<v S3>or even retirement. So that's from the assistive tech perspective

0:12:44.660 --> 0:12:48.179
<v S3>that becomes important that those considerations are considered early, not

0:12:48.179 --> 0:12:52.339
<v S3>just the technical risk considerations, but then those, um, assistive

0:12:52.380 --> 0:12:55.100
<v S3>tech are tested not just by somebody who knows what

0:12:55.099 --> 0:12:57.300
<v S3>the product should do, but by people who are going

0:12:57.339 --> 0:12:59.859
<v S3>to rely on using that assistive tech to interact with

0:12:59.859 --> 0:13:01.140
<v S3>that organization.

0:13:01.179 --> 0:13:04.939
<v S2>I'd love to touch back on that discussion you're having

0:13:04.939 --> 0:13:09.500
<v S2>before about the increased modularity and the increased flexibility of

0:13:09.500 --> 0:13:15.380
<v S2>these new guidelines in terms of being more receptive and

0:13:15.459 --> 0:13:19.459
<v S2>being able to react in quicker time to advances in

0:13:19.459 --> 0:13:25.020
<v S2>digital access, in assistive technology and technology more broadly, really.

0:13:25.339 --> 0:13:30.099
<v S2>So from your perspective, what's the biggest things for people

0:13:30.099 --> 0:13:33.540
<v S2>to be aware of? Organizations in charge of things like

0:13:33.540 --> 0:13:37.260
<v S2>these guidelines to be aware of in upcoming months and

0:13:37.260 --> 0:13:41.179
<v S2>years relating to these areas of accessibility?

0:13:41.380 --> 0:13:45.819
<v S3>Australia tends not to develop too many standards for accessibility

0:13:45.859 --> 0:13:49.500
<v S3>through standards Australia. What we tend to do, because we're

0:13:49.500 --> 0:13:53.860
<v S3>a small player internationally is adopt some of the international standards.

0:13:53.859 --> 0:13:55.860
<v S3>And so one of the standards that we adopted back

0:13:55.859 --> 0:13:59.459
<v S3>in 2016 for the first time was something called accessibility

0:13:59.459 --> 0:14:03.429
<v S3>requirements for ICT products and services. So that's a standard

0:14:03.429 --> 0:14:07.789
<v S3>that has gone through various iterations under Standards Australia through adoption.

0:14:07.790 --> 0:14:12.189
<v S3>And we've updated that adoption half a dozen times, probably

0:14:12.349 --> 0:14:15.070
<v S3>maybe five times since we first adopted it, because the

0:14:15.069 --> 0:14:18.950
<v S3>Europeans have updated their version. So by having that in

0:14:18.990 --> 0:14:21.749
<v S3>a separate chapter in this document means that we can

0:14:21.750 --> 0:14:24.990
<v S3>refer to the latest versions of this which are going

0:14:24.990 --> 0:14:28.749
<v S3>to stand up, make things more accessible, because rather than

0:14:28.790 --> 0:14:32.270
<v S3>relying on something that might have been hardwired, if you like,

0:14:32.270 --> 0:14:36.030
<v S3>into the guidelines, hopefully, you know, those chapters that are

0:14:36.030 --> 0:14:40.110
<v S3>about best practice can be updated more frequently as practice

0:14:40.109 --> 0:14:44.670
<v S3>changes and expectations change. But then the chapters that refer

0:14:44.670 --> 0:14:48.229
<v S3>to both government standards and international standards that we've adopted,

0:14:48.229 --> 0:14:51.190
<v S3>that should be the underpinning for what people meet, as

0:14:51.190 --> 0:14:54.630
<v S3>a minimum, will also be updated on a regular basis,

0:14:54.630 --> 0:14:57.470
<v S3>so that we can make sure that those can be

0:14:57.510 --> 0:15:01.430
<v S3>kept current, rather than referring to wcaG two, for instance,

0:15:01.430 --> 0:15:04.790
<v S3>which has gone through wcaG 2.1 and wcaG 2.2 over

0:15:04.790 --> 0:15:06.590
<v S3>the last ten years as well. And, you know, the

0:15:06.590 --> 0:15:08.350
<v S3>note wasn't kept up to date because of the way

0:15:08.350 --> 0:15:11.790
<v S3>it was written. So that modularity, we hope, will enable

0:15:11.790 --> 0:15:13.310
<v S3>the Commission to keep this current.

0:15:13.670 --> 0:15:17.950
<v S2>Now finally, Andrew, what's the best way for people to

0:15:17.990 --> 0:15:21.150
<v S2>find out more about the guidelines or have a look

0:15:21.150 --> 0:15:26.110
<v S2>through some other resources that are available for people through

0:15:26.150 --> 0:15:29.430
<v S2>intopia around digital accessibility.

0:15:29.830 --> 0:15:33.470
<v S3>So in conjunction with the Commission, we put together a

0:15:33.470 --> 0:15:36.590
<v S3>page of resources, and that page of resources would allow

0:15:36.590 --> 0:15:39.950
<v S3>people to go and actually listen to Rosemary, the Disability

0:15:39.990 --> 0:15:43.269
<v S3>Discrimination Commissioner, talking about the guidelines on the day that

0:15:43.270 --> 0:15:46.270
<v S3>they were released. We ran a webinar. We then ran

0:15:46.270 --> 0:15:49.110
<v S3>a webinar about a month later asking people to come

0:15:49.109 --> 0:15:51.310
<v S3>and ask some questions, because we didn't have the time

0:15:51.310 --> 0:15:53.350
<v S3>in the first webinar to do that. So both of

0:15:53.350 --> 0:15:57.190
<v S3>those are recorded and are available from our resources page

0:15:57.430 --> 0:16:00.600
<v S3>at intopia. That's probably the best starting point, and it

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:02.880
<v S3>points to the commissioner's press release as well as to

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.280
<v S3>the guidelines as well as to some other resources. So

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:08.640
<v S3>that's probably the best place to go and have a look.

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:10.720
<v S3>But if you go straight to the Human Rights Commission's

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:15.200
<v S3>homepage and go to disability rights, you'll find the guidelines

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:19.400
<v S3>themselves there. And they've been published in HTML, in word

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.880
<v S3>and in PDF in an accessible well, as accessible as

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.080
<v S3>PDF can be and accessible PDF. So depending on whether

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.040
<v S3>people want to download and have a print copy, or

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.280
<v S3>they want to read them online and how they want

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:32.840
<v S3>to do that, there's three different formats there for people

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:33.560
<v S3>to read.

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:38.920
<v S2>Perfect. Well, I've been speaking today with Andrew Arch, principal

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:45.200
<v S2>digital accessibility consultant at Intopia, about the guidelines on equal

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:49.759
<v S2>access to digital goods and services. Andrew, thank you very

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:52.400
<v S2>much for your time today. It's been great to catch

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.960
<v S2>up with you and have a chat about the guidelines.

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:57.920
<v S3>Great, and hopefully we can do something similar in the future.

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.879
<v S2>I'm Sam Corley and you're listening to Talking Vision on

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:12.520
<v S2>Vision Australia Radio. Associated Stations of Reading Radio and the

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:17.560
<v S2>Community Radio Network. I hope you enjoyed that conversation there

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:21.959
<v S2>with Andrew Arch from Intopia. If you missed any part

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:25.320
<v S2>of that conversation with Andrew or you'd love to hear

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:29.240
<v S2>it again. Talking vision can be found on the Vision

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:36.760
<v S2>Australia Radio website. Simply head to Viva Radio. That's all.

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:40.960
<v S2>One word dot. Or you can find the program on

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.280
<v S2>the podcast app of your choice or through the Vision

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:48.720
<v S2>Australia library. New research shows that nearly three quarters of

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:52.720
<v S2>Australians aged 35 to 50 have never heard of a

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:57.879
<v S2>common age related eye condition called presbyopia, which is likely

0:17:57.879 --> 0:18:04.090
<v S2>causing their vision issues. Individuals rely on temporary fixes to cope.

0:18:04.129 --> 0:18:10.410
<v S2>Masking the condition and delaying timely diagnosis and treatment. Optometrists

0:18:10.409 --> 0:18:13.970
<v S2>are urging people to watch out for workarounds and if

0:18:13.970 --> 0:18:18.290
<v S2>they find themselves enlarging text, holding print at arm's length,

0:18:18.330 --> 0:18:22.570
<v S2>or having trouble seeing the dashboard when driving, particularly at night,

0:18:22.690 --> 0:18:26.050
<v S2>it's time to book an eye test and to have

0:18:26.050 --> 0:18:30.650
<v S2>a chat with me all about this. I have Greeshma Patel,

0:18:30.690 --> 0:18:36.409
<v S2>Specsavers optometrist, here to tell us all about presbyopia and

0:18:36.409 --> 0:18:40.570
<v S2>the new research Greeshma. Welcome to Talking Vision. Thank you

0:18:40.570 --> 0:18:42.330
<v S2>very much for your time today.

0:18:43.050 --> 0:18:43.890
<v S4>Thanks, Dan.

0:18:44.570 --> 0:18:48.290
<v S2>Now, firstly, Greeshma, can you tell us more about the

0:18:48.290 --> 0:18:50.290
<v S2>new research findings?

0:18:50.810 --> 0:18:55.530
<v S4>So Specsavers have done a national survey which has recently

0:18:55.530 --> 0:18:59.250
<v S4>found that a really common eye I condition that affects

0:18:59.250 --> 0:19:02.570
<v S4>adults is actually something that a lot of adults aren't

0:19:02.570 --> 0:19:07.450
<v S4>aware of. Up to 72% of adults don't realize that

0:19:07.450 --> 0:19:11.570
<v S4>they're going through these midlife changes when they occur. So

0:19:11.850 --> 0:19:16.369
<v S4>I want to draw attention today to the fact that presbyopia,

0:19:16.409 --> 0:19:19.090
<v S4>which is this eye condition that affects a lot of

0:19:19.090 --> 0:19:23.330
<v S4>people around 40 years old, is quite normal. And I

0:19:23.369 --> 0:19:25.810
<v S4>want to go through some points on how to look

0:19:25.810 --> 0:19:27.330
<v S4>out for it and what to do if you start

0:19:27.330 --> 0:19:28.330
<v S4>noticing symptoms.

0:19:28.850 --> 0:19:33.729
<v S2>What are the risks associated with undiagnosed presbyopia?

0:19:34.129 --> 0:19:37.370
<v S4>So I'll start by explaining what presbyopia is, and then

0:19:37.369 --> 0:19:39.889
<v S4>we can have a look at the risks. Because presbyopia

0:19:39.889 --> 0:19:44.050
<v S4>is essentially when your lens inside the eye just doesn't

0:19:44.050 --> 0:19:46.609
<v S4>work as well when it's trying to focus on a

0:19:46.609 --> 0:19:49.570
<v S4>near object. So what that means is your long distance

0:19:49.570 --> 0:19:52.170
<v S4>vision may still feel good, and you may still see

0:19:52.210 --> 0:19:54.970
<v S4>things clearly. But when you go to pick up your

0:19:54.970 --> 0:19:57.090
<v S4>phone to read or you pick up a book, you

0:19:57.090 --> 0:19:59.780
<v S4>may notice that your vision isn't as clear or as

0:19:59.780 --> 0:20:02.459
<v S4>comfortable as it used to be. Now, the risks associated

0:20:02.460 --> 0:20:06.740
<v S4>with presbyopia if it's undiagnosed, untreated, if we're not doing

0:20:06.740 --> 0:20:08.939
<v S4>anything about it and we're just putting up with this

0:20:08.940 --> 0:20:12.740
<v S4>strain when we're reading, is that possibly you misread your

0:20:12.740 --> 0:20:17.100
<v S4>medication labels? You may misread ingredients when you're at the supermarket,

0:20:17.139 --> 0:20:20.460
<v S4>and especially with certain contrast on labels, if you're not

0:20:20.460 --> 0:20:22.620
<v S4>looking at black on white, if you're looking at white

0:20:22.619 --> 0:20:25.379
<v S4>writing on a colored label, you may find that you

0:20:25.379 --> 0:20:28.260
<v S4>make mistakes. So those people that have allergies or sensitivities

0:20:28.260 --> 0:20:31.219
<v S4>that are trying to avoid certain ingredients in foods could struggle.

0:20:31.260 --> 0:20:35.419
<v S4>But I'd say more importantly, it's medication bottles and important instructions.

0:20:35.419 --> 0:20:38.979
<v S4>If you can't read, you'd be struggling and mistakes happen there.

0:20:39.340 --> 0:20:44.380
<v S2>And greeshma what are some common misconceptions or some signs

0:20:44.379 --> 0:20:49.300
<v S2>that often lead people to overlook conditions like presbyopia?

0:20:49.820 --> 0:20:51.899
<v S4>So I see this all the time, Sam. So a

0:20:51.899 --> 0:20:55.860
<v S4>lot of misconceptions about presbyopia and other eye conditions is

0:20:55.859 --> 0:20:58.700
<v S4>that if I go to see my optometrist because I'm

0:20:58.700 --> 0:21:01.580
<v S4>having this problem with reading. I'll end up getting glasses

0:21:01.580 --> 0:21:04.259
<v S4>and they will make my eyes worse. And that's not true.

0:21:04.540 --> 0:21:08.140
<v S4>So glasses can't make your eyesight worse. In fact, something

0:21:08.139 --> 0:21:12.220
<v S4>like presbyopia is a condition that occurs with or without intervention.

0:21:12.220 --> 0:21:15.739
<v S4>So the lens goes through natural changes as we age.

0:21:15.780 --> 0:21:18.700
<v S4>And unfortunately, I have to use that term, even though

0:21:18.700 --> 0:21:21.740
<v S4>we're talking about this happening in our 40s, the lens

0:21:21.740 --> 0:21:24.060
<v S4>starts to harden. In fact, it starts hardening a little

0:21:24.100 --> 0:21:26.260
<v S4>bit before that. But a lot of my patients will

0:21:26.260 --> 0:21:29.260
<v S4>notice that they're struggling to see things around the time

0:21:29.300 --> 0:21:32.300
<v S4>of their 40s. And this is a working age group.

0:21:32.460 --> 0:21:35.460
<v S4>So people that are using computers, they're reading documents, they're

0:21:35.500 --> 0:21:38.379
<v S4>on their phones and they're looking at detail. If we're

0:21:38.379 --> 0:21:41.500
<v S4>not picking up on these signs and symptoms early, it

0:21:41.500 --> 0:21:44.300
<v S4>slows you down at work. And it's where mistakes are made.

0:21:44.300 --> 0:21:46.780
<v S4>And it's just a harder day and actually ultimately can

0:21:46.780 --> 0:21:50.020
<v S4>cause headaches. But the most common misconception around this is

0:21:50.020 --> 0:21:53.460
<v S4>if I start wearing glasses, it's a downward slippery slope

0:21:53.460 --> 0:21:55.660
<v S4>and I'm going to need glasses forever, and it's going

0:21:55.659 --> 0:21:57.790
<v S4>to make my eyes worse. And I just want to

0:21:57.790 --> 0:21:58.709
<v S4>dispel that myth.

0:21:59.190 --> 0:22:03.750
<v S2>Greeshma why is it so important to have regular eye tests,

0:22:03.790 --> 0:22:06.629
<v S2>especially as Australians do get older?

0:22:06.909 --> 0:22:10.070
<v S4>So two parts of that, Sam actually. So Australia is

0:22:10.109 --> 0:22:12.389
<v S4>a place that we have a lot of UV exposure

0:22:12.430 --> 0:22:14.550
<v S4>and a lot of the time from childhood years. So

0:22:14.590 --> 0:22:17.350
<v S4>with a lot of UV exposure comes the risk of

0:22:17.350 --> 0:22:21.149
<v S4>developing UV related conditions. And with the eyes we're talking

0:22:21.149 --> 0:22:25.790
<v S4>about early stages of cataracts or macular degeneration. These are

0:22:25.790 --> 0:22:29.909
<v S4>conditions that can be exacerbated by UV exposure. So over time,

0:22:29.950 --> 0:22:33.510
<v S4>it's important to understand your risk and understand whether these

0:22:33.510 --> 0:22:36.469
<v S4>have impacted the eyes, whether it has impacted the eyes.

0:22:36.750 --> 0:22:40.750
<v S4>Things like smoking can cause premature problems with eyes as well,

0:22:40.909 --> 0:22:45.470
<v S4>and certain health conditions like diabetes. So having these tests done,

0:22:45.510 --> 0:22:48.189
<v S4>having your eyes tested from an early age, even before

0:22:48.190 --> 0:22:51.630
<v S4>you start noticing symptoms is really useful because if there

0:22:51.629 --> 0:22:55.310
<v S4>is something to monitor, we can do that in optometry now,

0:22:55.430 --> 0:23:00.510
<v S4>especially at Specsavers, we offer 3D retinal scan called Oct scanning,

0:23:00.710 --> 0:23:05.550
<v S4>which is really useful in the diagnosing and detecting eye

0:23:05.590 --> 0:23:08.669
<v S4>conditions a lot earlier than if we were just to

0:23:08.950 --> 0:23:10.989
<v S4>not present grotesque, but certainly if we were to use

0:23:10.990 --> 0:23:14.510
<v S4>traditional methods. So things like glaucoma and macular disease can

0:23:14.510 --> 0:23:17.350
<v S4>be picked up a lot sooner. Just need to present yourself.

0:23:17.350 --> 0:23:20.109
<v S4>And eye tests are bulk billed these days, so there's

0:23:20.109 --> 0:23:22.710
<v S4>no charge, no cost to you. Just popping in for

0:23:22.710 --> 0:23:25.509
<v S4>a test for clarinet is useful, and especially if you're

0:23:25.510 --> 0:23:28.550
<v S4>having symptoms, don't hang about. Go and get your eyes tested,

0:23:28.550 --> 0:23:30.830
<v S4>because sometimes what seems as though it could be a

0:23:30.830 --> 0:23:35.230
<v S4>very simple focusing problem could actually be an underlying eye condition.

0:23:35.270 --> 0:23:37.190
<v S4>And this is where we want to pick these things

0:23:37.190 --> 0:23:37.990
<v S4>up early.

0:23:38.030 --> 0:23:42.350
<v S2>On that note. Finally, grishma, where can Australians go to

0:23:42.389 --> 0:23:45.230
<v S2>learn more? Or to book an eye test.

0:23:45.629 --> 0:23:49.710
<v S4>So you can pop onto our website Specsavers. Com.au. A

0:23:49.710 --> 0:23:52.789
<v S4>list of common eye conditions are on their stores that

0:23:52.790 --> 0:23:55.790
<v S4>you can book in for an eye examination. An opportunity

0:23:55.830 --> 0:23:57.560
<v S4>to talk to cut your Medicare card in there. So,

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.159
<v S4>you know it's going to be bulk billed and there's

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.320
<v S4>probably a Specsavers close to you wherever you are or

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:07.240
<v S4>within reasonable distance. So hopefully we're widely accessible. So pop

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:09.279
<v S4>in when you can. And if you're walking past a

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.239
<v S4>practice and you're not sure if you'll get that chance

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.879
<v S4>again because you're busy, just pop in on the off chance.

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:20.600
<v S2>Well, I've been speaking today with Grishma Patel, optometrist at Specsavers.

0:24:20.639 --> 0:24:25.359
<v S2>Chatting to me today about presbyopia and the ways that

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.680
<v S2>it can be treated. Greeshma thank you so much for

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:31.520
<v S2>your time today. It was great to catch up with you.

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:32.640
<v S4>Thank you Sam.

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:39.199
<v S2>For the first time, people across Australia are participating in

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:43.560
<v S2>a national survey radio and you designed to capture the

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:48.600
<v S2>real impact of community radio. The results will inform discussions

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:53.639
<v S2>with government decision makers, helping to secure future support and

0:24:53.639 --> 0:24:59.040
<v S2>funding for the entire community broadcasting sector. If you're a

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:03.040
<v S2>listener to Vision Australia Radio or any other community radio

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:07.240
<v S2>organisation and you'd love to have your say, this is

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:11.960
<v S2>the perfect opportunity to do so. Simply head to the

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:17.399
<v S2>Vision Australia Radio Facebook page and Search Radio and you

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:21.240
<v S2>to find out all about the survey and the link

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:26.120
<v S2>to take part. The survey closes on the 30th of June,

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:28.800
<v S2>so you still have a few days to have your

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:33.159
<v S2>say and get involved. Any support you can offer would

0:25:33.159 --> 0:25:37.359
<v S2>be fantastic. So make sure to spread the word if

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:41.240
<v S2>you haven't taken part in the survey already. Also, jump

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.840
<v S2>in and have your say and let people know who

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:48.359
<v S2>might also be interested to have their say about the

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:59.249
<v S2>future of community radio in 2025. And that's all the

0:25:59.250 --> 0:26:03.290
<v S2>time we have for today. You've been listening to Talking Vision.

0:26:03.690 --> 0:26:08.009
<v S2>Talking vision is a Vision Australia radio production. Thanks to

0:26:08.050 --> 0:26:12.410
<v S2>all involved with putting the show together every week. And remember,

0:26:12.409 --> 0:26:15.129
<v S2>we love hearing from you. So please get in touch

0:26:15.129 --> 0:26:20.170
<v S2>anytime on our email at Talking Vision at Vision Australia dot.

0:26:20.730 --> 0:26:25.889
<v S2>That's talking vision all. One word at Vision Australia. But

0:26:25.889 --> 0:26:29.449
<v S2>until next week it's Sam Culley saying bye for now.

0:26:32.889 --> 0:26:36.970
<v S1>You can contact Vision Australia by phoning us anytime during

0:26:36.970 --> 0:26:44.850
<v S1>business hours on one 384 746. That's one 384 74

0:26:45.369 --> 0:26:50.290
<v S1>six or by visiting Vision Australia. That's Vision Australia.