WEBVTT - Talking Tech 18th July 2023

0:00:08.218 --> 0:00:11.848
<v S1>Hello everyone. Welcome to Talking Tech. This edition available from

0:00:11.848 --> 0:00:15.988
<v S1>July the 18th, 2023. I'm Stephen Jolly. Great to have

0:00:15.988 --> 0:00:19.318
<v S1>you with us wherever you're listening, perhaps through Vision Australia Radio,

0:00:19.318 --> 0:00:24.178
<v S1>associated Stations of Australia or maybe the Community Radio Network,

0:00:24.448 --> 0:00:26.938
<v S1>there is also the podcast. If you haven't caught up

0:00:26.938 --> 0:00:29.008
<v S1>with that yet, all you need to do is search

0:00:29.008 --> 0:00:32.188
<v S1>for the two words. Talking tech and DNA can all

0:00:32.188 --> 0:00:35.758
<v S1>come usually on a Tuesday afternoon just after it's been produced.

0:00:36.118 --> 0:00:38.968
<v S1>Another option is to ask your Siri device or smart

0:00:38.968 --> 0:00:43.648
<v S1>speaker to play Vision Australia Radio Talking Tech Podcast. Vision

0:00:43.648 --> 0:00:47.818
<v S1>Australia Radio Talking Tech podcast. With me someone who can

0:00:47.818 --> 0:00:51.508
<v S1>explain all this tech stuff really well. Vision Australia's National

0:00:51.508 --> 0:00:56.908
<v S1>Advisor on Access Technology, David Woodbridge. David, as you suggested,

0:00:56.908 --> 0:01:00.088
<v S1>it's probably about time we had a good yarn about

0:01:00.088 --> 0:01:05.098
<v S1>AI or artificial intelligence. So my first question to you

0:01:05.098 --> 0:01:09.148
<v S1>is standing at a barbecue and AI comes up in

0:01:09.148 --> 0:01:12.508
<v S1>conversation and someone says to you, What's AI all about?

0:01:12.508 --> 0:01:18.118
<v S2>David So the simple answer about AI is it's to

0:01:18.238 --> 0:01:22.368
<v S2>teach or instruct or code. Computers in general use it

0:01:22.378 --> 0:01:26.578
<v S2>in quotation marks, computers in general, to think and learn.

0:01:26.578 --> 0:01:30.568
<v S2>So they access data, they interpret the data, and then

0:01:30.568 --> 0:01:33.208
<v S2>they output some result out of that. So they look

0:01:33.208 --> 0:01:37.108
<v S2>at lots and lots and lots of data bases and

0:01:37.108 --> 0:01:38.818
<v S2>then whatever you ask for, they're sort of like try

0:01:38.818 --> 0:01:42.058
<v S2>and link that statistically together and then give you an

0:01:42.058 --> 0:01:46.558
<v S2>appropriate answer. But its basic premise is think and learn.

0:01:46.768 --> 0:01:49.138
<v S1>And the learn is what's a bit of a worry

0:01:49.138 --> 0:01:52.078
<v S1>for people? And just briefly, because they could take us

0:01:52.078 --> 0:01:56.278
<v S1>into territory people fear that we haven't anticipated.

0:01:56.578 --> 0:01:58.618
<v S2>That's right. It also depends on the data that the

0:01:58.618 --> 0:02:01.468
<v S2>thing's accessing. So if the data is incorrect, then the

0:02:01.468 --> 0:02:03.688
<v S2>output is going to be incorrect or slightly off the

0:02:03.688 --> 0:02:07.288
<v S2>planet a bit. So that's the other thing, because, you

0:02:07.288 --> 0:02:09.508
<v S2>know the old expression, Steve, from back in the old days,

0:02:09.508 --> 0:02:12.658
<v S2>garbage in, garbage out. In some ways you can get

0:02:12.658 --> 0:02:14.098
<v S2>the same thing with AI.

0:02:14.518 --> 0:02:17.608
<v S1>So what's the potential for people who are blind or

0:02:17.608 --> 0:02:19.018
<v S1>have low vision with AI?

0:02:19.498 --> 0:02:23.038
<v S2>This has got tremendous benefit because if you think about

0:02:23.038 --> 0:02:25.678
<v S2>the thing that you can actually ask this thing. So

0:02:25.678 --> 0:02:29.428
<v S2>it's beyond what Siri and AI lady and those sort

0:02:29.428 --> 0:02:33.748
<v S2>of things do, which is fairly simple tasks. But for example,

0:02:33.748 --> 0:02:35.968
<v S2>I can say to I can you give me the

0:02:35.968 --> 0:02:39.538
<v S2>main monuments that I'll be able to find in, I

0:02:39.538 --> 0:02:42.598
<v S2>don't know, Paris or Rome or anything else, then I

0:02:42.598 --> 0:02:44.308
<v S2>can say, well, look, you know, can you tell me

0:02:44.308 --> 0:02:46.978
<v S2>more about X, Y and Z monument? And then we

0:02:46.978 --> 0:02:49.918
<v S2>can keep going down the rabbit hole. You can get

0:02:49.918 --> 0:02:52.298
<v S2>as broad as you like. You can get specific like.

0:02:52.378 --> 0:02:55.618
<v S2>And what I like about it is that you'll see

0:02:55.618 --> 0:02:58.798
<v S2>more systems now that actually give you the links of

0:02:58.798 --> 0:03:02.218
<v S2>where it got the information from and pulled it all

0:03:02.218 --> 0:03:07.348
<v S2>together for you. It's also really good in being able to,

0:03:07.348 --> 0:03:13.048
<v S2>if you like, properly construct things like emails or letters

0:03:13.048 --> 0:03:15.058
<v S2>and that sort of stuff. And I've been using that

0:03:15.058 --> 0:03:18.448
<v S2>for a while now when I've been sending app developers

0:03:18.448 --> 0:03:23.218
<v S2>and web developers some feedback upon perhaps how non accessible

0:03:23.218 --> 0:03:27.658
<v S2>their websites are. I don't copy and paste what the

0:03:27.658 --> 0:03:30.568
<v S2>AI has come back with, but what I have done is,

0:03:30.658 --> 0:03:33.928
<v S2>you know, the ten points that it's come up with

0:03:33.928 --> 0:03:36.298
<v S2>and I might have only thought about four of them

0:03:36.958 --> 0:03:41.038
<v S2>is just absolutely amazing. So it's also reminding me that,

0:03:41.038 --> 0:03:44.368
<v S2>you know, as a human, I don't know everything and

0:03:44.368 --> 0:03:48.928
<v S2>the AI wireless know well, it knows things, doesn't know

0:03:48.928 --> 0:03:52.018
<v S2>everything that may or may not be relevant to this

0:03:52.018 --> 0:03:56.308
<v S2>particular email I'm sending. And it's almost between AI and

0:03:56.308 --> 0:03:59.698
<v S2>humans and for us blind people. So if you can

0:03:59.698 --> 0:04:02.548
<v S2>get lost in websites because there are so many things

0:04:02.548 --> 0:04:06.238
<v S2>that are quite inaccessible that this thing really defines and

0:04:06.238 --> 0:04:07.468
<v S2>narrows it down for you a lot.

0:04:07.828 --> 0:04:10.138
<v S1>You've been doing a fair bit of reading on this lately.

0:04:10.648 --> 0:04:13.648
<v S1>A number of well known people have had a bit

0:04:13.648 --> 0:04:17.008
<v S1>to say about it. Bill Gates writes that there's no

0:04:17.008 --> 0:04:18.478
<v S1>need to be afraid of AI.

0:04:18.928 --> 0:04:21.058
<v S2>Basically, what he said really in a nutshell was that, look,

0:04:21.058 --> 0:04:23.398
<v S2>when calculators came in, everybody thought it was going to

0:04:23.398 --> 0:04:26.038
<v S2>be the end of maths, that we wouldn't have had a,

0:04:26.188 --> 0:04:30.178
<v S2>you know, add, subtract, divide and times anymore. Then when

0:04:30.178 --> 0:04:32.788
<v S2>computers came into the classroom, it's like, well, that's going

0:04:32.788 --> 0:04:35.218
<v S2>to be the end. People won't remember how to handwrite

0:04:35.218 --> 0:04:38.098
<v S2>or do other things because the computer does it everything

0:04:38.098 --> 0:04:41.728
<v S2>for you. And now if artificial intelligence people are saying, oh, no,

0:04:41.728 --> 0:04:43.348
<v S2>that's that's going to be the end of people who

0:04:43.348 --> 0:04:46.378
<v S2>are able to to be able to research. But one

0:04:46.378 --> 0:04:50.188
<v S2>thing that II doesn't do is that it's not intuitive,

0:04:50.188 --> 0:04:54.148
<v S2>it's not empathic, and it's not particularly understanding what it

0:04:54.148 --> 0:04:57.688
<v S2>really is good on in quotes, is finding facts that

0:04:57.688 --> 0:05:00.718
<v S2>it has access to. And then you can do your

0:05:00.718 --> 0:05:02.878
<v S2>own thing with it. But at the moment, there are

0:05:02.878 --> 0:05:07.328
<v S2>places around the world that are looking at guidelines. Lines

0:05:07.328 --> 0:05:11.918
<v S2>to say to AI will Perhaps AI systems should only

0:05:11.918 --> 0:05:15.458
<v S2>go a certain way and if they start going down

0:05:15.458 --> 0:05:18.428
<v S2>the wrong little rabbit hole, then there should be guidelines

0:05:18.428 --> 0:05:21.218
<v S2>to say, well, stop, you're not allowed to do that,

0:05:21.218 --> 0:05:23.378
<v S2>or you're not allowed to process that data or whatever

0:05:23.378 --> 0:05:26.498
<v S2>else it might be. So I think people in Australia

0:05:26.498 --> 0:05:30.938
<v S2>we are particularly wary of AI, apparently according to some statistics,

0:05:30.938 --> 0:05:33.968
<v S2>and I think it's just wait and see what happens

0:05:33.968 --> 0:05:36.878
<v S2>because humans are not stupid. We're going to be able

0:05:36.878 --> 0:05:39.068
<v S2>to work out how to control things and I just

0:05:39.068 --> 0:05:42.728
<v S2>think we just need to be positive about being able

0:05:42.728 --> 0:05:45.608
<v S2>to develop something that was like a control over.

0:05:45.878 --> 0:05:49.118
<v S1>It's interesting that Bill Gates is having a view on

0:05:49.118 --> 0:05:52.628
<v S1>this because, of course, his experience goes back a long way,

0:05:52.628 --> 0:05:54.278
<v S1>back to the early days of Microsoft.

0:05:54.548 --> 0:05:57.188
<v S2>Yep. And keep in mind that the original term artificial

0:05:57.188 --> 0:06:02.558
<v S2>Intelligence was actually coined in 1956. So it's not a

0:06:02.558 --> 0:06:05.738
<v S2>new term that suddenly sprouted up. It's actually been around

0:06:05.738 --> 0:06:08.978
<v S2>for you know, over 50 years now. So it's not

0:06:08.978 --> 0:06:10.748
<v S2>a brand new term. It's just that it's getting more

0:06:10.748 --> 0:06:14.168
<v S2>and more in our face about how important it is

0:06:14.168 --> 0:06:16.568
<v S2>and how important it is to make sure we don't

0:06:16.568 --> 0:06:17.828
<v S2>lose control over the thing.

0:06:18.098 --> 0:06:20.468
<v S1>What's the head of Amazon got to say about this?

0:06:21.068 --> 0:06:23.318
<v S2>By the article I was looking at, they didn't actually

0:06:23.318 --> 0:06:27.188
<v S2>mention a lady at all. You know, they said, this

0:06:27.188 --> 0:06:30.878
<v S2>is not your personal assistant. This is all the background

0:06:30.878 --> 0:06:34.538
<v S2>data stats crunching in the background that they're going to

0:06:34.538 --> 0:06:38.498
<v S2>make code available for third party developers to pull in

0:06:38.498 --> 0:06:44.198
<v S2>relevant information to then help their corporate base systems be

0:06:44.198 --> 0:06:47.468
<v S2>more AI driven in the future. So he was saying,

0:06:47.468 --> 0:06:49.538
<v S2>you know, the bars of the world and the bings

0:06:49.538 --> 0:06:53.528
<v S2>of the world and the japes of the world. Yes,

0:06:53.528 --> 0:06:56.468
<v S2>you know, they're in your face and everything else, but like,

0:06:57.308 --> 0:07:01.508
<v S2>you know, meta, so i.e. Facebook and then like Amazon,

0:07:01.508 --> 0:07:04.508
<v S2>they're also working on artificial intelligence as well. It's not

0:07:04.508 --> 0:07:06.968
<v S2>so much in your face, but they're certainly working on it.

0:07:06.968 --> 0:07:09.428
<v S2>So I think his point was to say, Please don't

0:07:09.428 --> 0:07:11.858
<v S2>forget us because we're also working on an extremely hard.

0:07:12.518 --> 0:07:20.228
<v S1>You mentioned ChatGPT, the OpenAI people responsible for ChatGPT. They're

0:07:20.228 --> 0:07:24.008
<v S1>very mindful of the possibility of AI getting out of

0:07:24.008 --> 0:07:25.808
<v S1>control and doing something about it.

0:07:26.118 --> 0:07:29.228
<v S2>That's right, because the term that now people are talking

0:07:29.228 --> 0:07:32.948
<v S2>about is this thing called super AI. And I remember

0:07:32.948 --> 0:07:35.318
<v S2>reading a science fiction book couple of years ago that

0:07:35.318 --> 0:07:39.308
<v S2>mentioned the word AI in it, and it was basically

0:07:39.308 --> 0:07:42.258
<v S2>getting to the stage where the AI basically decided that

0:07:42.258 --> 0:07:44.198
<v S2>the human race was too dangerous. So I decided to

0:07:44.198 --> 0:07:47.468
<v S2>start culling it. So it's not that bad at the moment,

0:07:47.468 --> 0:07:50.888
<v S2>but I think what open AI people are saying is

0:07:51.188 --> 0:07:53.768
<v S2>we're going to make sure that we have guidelines that

0:07:53.768 --> 0:07:56.858
<v S2>will restrict ideas in certain things. And if you wanted

0:07:56.858 --> 0:07:59.018
<v S2>a doomsday scenario, Steve, I guess the one of them

0:07:59.018 --> 0:08:02.288
<v S2>is that there is no way artificial intelligence is going

0:08:02.288 --> 0:08:04.898
<v S2>to have access to to weapons of mass destruction. That

0:08:04.898 --> 0:08:08.138
<v S2>would just be stupid if it suddenly decided that, you know,

0:08:08.228 --> 0:08:11.768
<v S2>that the world or particular country needed got rid of,

0:08:12.008 --> 0:08:14.108
<v S2>then it could take control of the weapons. And that's

0:08:14.108 --> 0:08:16.538
<v S2>a really extreme example. But that's the sort of stuff

0:08:16.538 --> 0:08:19.478
<v S2>that you would never give an AI system access to.

0:08:19.838 --> 0:08:24.098
<v S1>AI and the potential disruption to the education system as

0:08:24.098 --> 0:08:25.568
<v S1>we know it. Ways of learning.

0:08:25.718 --> 0:08:29.018
<v S2>Again, I agree with this article because basically at the

0:08:29.018 --> 0:08:33.008
<v S2>moment our education system is very focused on exams and

0:08:33.008 --> 0:08:38.618
<v S2>memorizing particular facts or just, you know, repeating what you've

0:08:38.618 --> 0:08:41.618
<v S2>been told and writing down an exam. So there's no

0:08:41.618 --> 0:08:45.698
<v S2>intuitive or creative thinking going on. And one of the

0:08:45.698 --> 0:08:49.178
<v S2>things that have been finding what AI does and things

0:08:49.178 --> 0:08:53.258
<v S2>like ChatGPT is it makes the person more critical in

0:08:53.258 --> 0:08:57.008
<v S2>their thinking so they can do reasonable amounts or a

0:08:57.008 --> 0:09:00.488
<v S2>lot amount of research based on GPT, also with other

0:09:00.488 --> 0:09:04.358
<v S2>fact checking as well and come out with some amazing results.

0:09:04.358 --> 0:09:07.838
<v S2>So it's like AI is going to make research a

0:09:07.838 --> 0:09:10.568
<v S2>lot easier. It does not mean people are going to

0:09:10.568 --> 0:09:12.458
<v S2>end up being stupid and say, Well, this thing just

0:09:12.458 --> 0:09:15.338
<v S2>wrote my exam for you. It's the opposite way around

0:09:15.338 --> 0:09:18.608
<v S2>because you've got access to research and pulling in all

0:09:18.608 --> 0:09:23.048
<v S2>types of different data. You then as an intelligent human being,

0:09:23.348 --> 0:09:24.788
<v S2>can then make up your own mind.

0:09:25.658 --> 0:09:31.088
<v S1>An MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology study talks about ChatGPT

0:09:31.088 --> 0:09:32.648
<v S1>increasing productivity.

0:09:33.008 --> 0:09:36.848
<v S2>Yeah. Now look, I know they're talking about ChatGPT, but

0:09:37.028 --> 0:09:38.648
<v S2>let's just, you know, pull it back and make it

0:09:38.648 --> 0:09:40.958
<v S2>a bit more general. Let's just say AI in general.

0:09:41.258 --> 0:09:44.258
<v S2>And what they found was that and they did, you know,

0:09:44.258 --> 0:09:47.138
<v S2>your test, your test group. So one test group had

0:09:47.138 --> 0:09:49.478
<v S2>the AI, the other test group didn't, and they had

0:09:49.478 --> 0:09:53.228
<v S2>to write a range of different articles like memos and

0:09:53.228 --> 0:09:56.438
<v S2>advertisements and sensitive emails and that sort of stuff. And

0:09:56.438 --> 0:09:59.438
<v S2>what they found was the people that use the AI

0:09:59.468 --> 0:10:04.268
<v S2>system spent less time actually compiling the email or the

0:10:04.268 --> 0:10:10.428
<v S2>advertisement than people that. Weren't using AI. So again, it's

0:10:10.428 --> 0:10:13.068
<v S2>one of those things where, yes, you know, I could

0:10:13.068 --> 0:10:15.378
<v S2>sit down here and I could, you know, ponder for

0:10:15.468 --> 0:10:18.428
<v S2>30 minutes on how to write a delicate email to,

0:10:18.438 --> 0:10:21.378
<v S2>you know, for me, for a developer to basically say,

0:10:21.378 --> 0:10:23.898
<v S2>you need to pull your socks up or I can

0:10:23.898 --> 0:10:27.408
<v S2>back into AI and say, Can you write me a

0:10:27.408 --> 0:10:32.778
<v S2>nice email? Which points out how incredibly important is accessibility

0:10:32.778 --> 0:10:36.138
<v S2>and your app is not meeting those requirements. And when

0:10:36.138 --> 0:10:40.308
<v S2>it spits back the result, I can then massage that text.

0:10:40.308 --> 0:10:42.858
<v S2>I can change the wording around, but at least I've

0:10:42.858 --> 0:10:45.678
<v S2>got the body. Because you know, sometimes when you're actually writing,

0:10:45.828 --> 0:10:49.398
<v S2>you just want that beginning sentence or that beginning idea

0:10:49.398 --> 0:10:51.678
<v S2>that then sparks the rest of your writing for you.

0:10:51.768 --> 0:10:56.028
<v S1>That's true. Let's turn to news reading now. And certainly

0:10:56.268 --> 0:11:00.978
<v S1>it's started in Asia where AI is being used to

0:11:00.978 --> 0:11:02.478
<v S1>generate news bulletins.

0:11:02.688 --> 0:11:04.548
<v S2>This is a weird one. So. So the way this

0:11:04.548 --> 0:11:06.438
<v S2>works is and the guy, for example, of this lady

0:11:06.528 --> 0:11:09.348
<v S2>in India who, you know, she may not be able

0:11:09.348 --> 0:11:11.928
<v S2>to be in the newsroom. So what she does is

0:11:11.928 --> 0:11:16.668
<v S2>that she reads the news articles, you know, into a

0:11:16.668 --> 0:11:20.748
<v S2>recorder that's sent back to the studio and then that studio,

0:11:20.748 --> 0:11:25.638
<v S2>then using her voice puts that voice with this AI,

0:11:25.638 --> 0:11:30.408
<v S2>artificial intelligence generated avatar on the screen that looks like her.

0:11:30.708 --> 0:11:33.108
<v S2>And then what they also do is they use her

0:11:33.108 --> 0:11:37.518
<v S2>voice to then read in different languages. So in India,

0:11:37.518 --> 0:11:40.308
<v S2>it was English and the other major languages spoken in India.

0:11:40.308 --> 0:11:44.028
<v S2>And then that person that's reading that in her, you know,

0:11:44.148 --> 0:11:47.708
<v S2>the different language using her voice is also a different avatar.

0:11:47.718 --> 0:11:52.218
<v S2>So you've got her avatar and another avatar reading the

0:11:52.218 --> 0:11:54.348
<v S2>news in a different language. And it's all done by

0:11:54.348 --> 0:11:57.228
<v S2>artificial intelligence. And just one more point on this. What

0:11:57.228 --> 0:11:59.538
<v S2>somebody was saying, I think it was at Queensland University. Well,

0:11:59.538 --> 0:12:01.698
<v S2>it's all well and good to have these translation things

0:12:01.698 --> 0:12:05.148
<v S2>in a different languages, but there are nuances in different

0:12:05.148 --> 0:12:09.738
<v S2>languages and different words are important than others and you

0:12:09.738 --> 0:12:12.768
<v S2>would still need some sort of linguistic on board to

0:12:12.768 --> 0:12:16.278
<v S2>make sure that the translation to a different language wasn't

0:12:16.278 --> 0:12:19.458
<v S2>lost in going to from English to another language.

0:12:19.938 --> 0:12:26.358
<v S1>Is the Robodebt debacle in Australia an example of where

0:12:26.358 --> 0:12:28.278
<v S1>I could get out of control?

0:12:28.488 --> 0:12:31.578
<v S2>It effectively is. And the simple reason was there was

0:12:31.578 --> 0:12:35.358
<v S2>no human being overseeing it properly. By the way, this

0:12:35.358 --> 0:12:38.208
<v S2>thing had a 27% failure rate, so that's how much

0:12:38.208 --> 0:12:42.288
<v S2>it got wrong and it was literally matching data sets

0:12:42.288 --> 0:12:46.338
<v S2>and what it thought where people like debt was actually incorrect.

0:12:46.338 --> 0:12:48.498
<v S2>And this comes back to the thing I said earlier on.

0:12:48.498 --> 0:12:52.158
<v S2>These things have no empathy, no compassion, no intuitive, no insight,

0:12:52.158 --> 0:12:55.158
<v S2>no nothing at the moment. So who knows? Maybe I

0:12:55.158 --> 0:12:58.188
<v S2>will have that eventually. Every time we do things with these,

0:12:58.188 --> 0:13:00.918
<v S2>there needs to be guidelines, which we've already talked about,

0:13:00.918 --> 0:13:05.208
<v S2>and there always needs to be humans involved, particularly at

0:13:05.208 --> 0:13:08.598
<v S2>such intimate things as you owe the government money.

0:13:08.958 --> 0:13:11.358
<v S1>Thinking of our situation as people who are blind or

0:13:11.358 --> 0:13:15.558
<v S1>have low vision, you're optimistic about the future role of AI.

0:13:16.158 --> 0:13:19.458
<v S2>I am. If we can use AI to say what's

0:13:19.458 --> 0:13:22.758
<v S2>around me, what's the most important thing near me? Can

0:13:22.758 --> 0:13:26.388
<v S2>you describe my surroundings? Or, you know, you might pick

0:13:26.388 --> 0:13:30.378
<v S2>up a photo and say, Can you describe my child

0:13:30.378 --> 0:13:32.988
<v S2>in this photo that my wife took when when they

0:13:32.988 --> 0:13:36.108
<v S2>were two years old? Being able to interpret different types

0:13:36.108 --> 0:13:39.258
<v S2>of data to make it easier to access information. We're

0:13:39.258 --> 0:13:42.048
<v S2>on the cusp of a great movement forward. So I'm

0:13:42.048 --> 0:13:44.028
<v S2>really looking forward to the next ten years or so.

0:13:44.268 --> 0:13:46.938
<v S1>And now coming back to the present, just before we go,

0:13:46.938 --> 0:13:49.848
<v S1>a reminder of where people can find details of what

0:13:49.848 --> 0:13:52.398
<v S1>you've been talking about in this and previous editions of

0:13:52.398 --> 0:13:53.058
<v S1>the program.

0:13:53.118 --> 0:13:55.158
<v S2>As always, you can check out our website, which is

0:13:55.158 --> 0:13:59.478
<v S2>David Woodmere dot Podbean pad com David.

0:13:59.478 --> 0:14:04.248
<v S1>Would be dot podbean pod b e a n to

0:14:04.248 --> 0:14:05.238
<v S1>write to the program.

0:14:05.448 --> 0:14:07.548
<v S2>You can write to me at Vision Australia where I work,

0:14:07.548 --> 0:14:11.838
<v S2>which is David Dot Woodbridge. How it sounds at Vision Australia. Org.

0:14:12.048 --> 0:14:17.508
<v S1>David Dot Woodbridge at Vision australia.org. This has been talking

0:14:17.508 --> 0:14:21.168
<v S1>tech with me has been Vision Australia's National Advisor on

0:14:21.168 --> 0:14:25.248
<v S1>Access Technology, David Woodbridge. I'm Stephen Jolley. Take care. We'll

0:14:25.248 --> 0:14:26.688
<v S1>talk more tech next week. See you.