WEBVTT - How to master difficult conversations at work, with Tim Duggan

0:00:00.180 --> 0:00:04.220
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode is brought to you by Amazon Business. Unlock

0:00:04.260 --> 0:00:09.090
<v Speaker 1>smart business buying. Learn more at amazon.com.au forward slash how

0:00:09.250 --> 0:00:09.690
<v Speaker 1>I work.

0:00:09.910 --> 0:00:12.990
<v Speaker 2>When we're in conflict, we use words that are very accusatory.

0:00:13.670 --> 0:00:16.349
<v Speaker 2>So we say, why did you do that? There's a

0:00:16.710 --> 0:00:19.410
<v Speaker 2>really powerful word that if you replace it and use

0:00:19.450 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 2>this as many times as possible, you will change the

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:23.830
<v Speaker 2>tamper of the conversation. And the word is.

0:00:24.780 --> 0:00:28.340
<v Speaker 1>That was Tim Duggan. And we'll get to that magic

0:00:28.420 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>word soon. But first, I'd like to confirm that nobody

0:00:32.860 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in the history of arguments has ever calmed down because

0:00:36.420 --> 0:00:38.950
<v Speaker 1>someone asked, why did you do that?

0:00:39.790 --> 0:00:42.150
<v Speaker 3>Especially in that tone. Here's the thing.

0:00:43.010 --> 0:00:46.930
<v Speaker 1>About 80% of us avoid conflict whenever we get the chance,

0:00:47.390 --> 0:00:51.470
<v Speaker 1>which means most of us get very little practice at it.

0:00:52.409 --> 0:00:55.860
<v Speaker 1>Tim was one of those people. He spent 15 years

0:00:56.100 --> 0:01:01.740
<v Speaker 1>running a media company, refereeing other people's conflicts with zero training,

0:01:02.220 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>which is a strange job for a self-confessed conflict avoider.

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>So for his new book, Clear Intention, he flew to

0:01:10.700 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Perth more than a dozen times to become an accredited mediator.

0:01:15.569 --> 0:01:18.790
<v Speaker 1>And along the way, he picked the brains of negotiation

0:01:18.890 --> 0:01:23.090
<v Speaker 1>experts at Oxford, had dinner with Esther Perel and asked

0:01:23.110 --> 0:01:28.010
<v Speaker 1>Amanda Knox about the tattoos on her arm. In this conversation,

0:01:28.170 --> 0:01:31.570
<v Speaker 1>Tim shares a five step framework that you can run

0:01:31.610 --> 0:01:35.300
<v Speaker 1>through in your head mid argument, a listening trick that

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.220
<v Speaker 1>you can use to defuse any conflict. and a bunch

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.500
<v Speaker 1>of other super practical ways to help you get more

0:01:41.580 --> 0:01:45.709
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with conflict, which let's face it, most of us

0:01:45.790 --> 0:01:50.230
<v Speaker 1>find pretty uncomfortable. Oh, and that word Tim was going

0:01:50.250 --> 0:01:53.950
<v Speaker 1>to say, it is waiting for you in this episode.

0:01:59.920 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to How I Work, a show about habits, rituals,

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and strategies for optimizing your day.

0:02:06.570 --> 0:02:08.490
<v Speaker 3>I'm your host, Dr. Amantha Imber.

0:02:13.190 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 4>One of the things that you did when you were

0:02:15.030 --> 0:02:18.540
<v Speaker 4>researching your new book, Clear Intention, is you became an

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.340
<v Speaker 4>accredited mediator, correct?

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:02:22.100 --> 0:02:25.940
<v Speaker 4>That is a huge commitment. I want to know, what

0:02:25.980 --> 0:02:30.620
<v Speaker 4>were the most interesting slash surprising things that you learned

0:02:30.690 --> 0:02:31.470
<v Speaker 4>in that process?

0:02:31.970 --> 0:02:34.810
<v Speaker 2>I think it's one of the most useful life skills

0:02:35.610 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 2>I ever learned. It was originally out of curiosity and

0:02:39.860 --> 0:02:41.700
<v Speaker 2>it was out of a desire for me to go

0:02:41.940 --> 0:02:45.859
<v Speaker 2>deeper into this topic and truly understand it. I looked

0:02:45.900 --> 0:02:49.690
<v Speaker 2>around Australia and I found what I thought looked like

0:02:49.750 --> 0:02:52.730
<v Speaker 2>the best course to do it. It was the University

0:02:52.750 --> 0:02:57.490
<v Speaker 2>of West Australia and I'm based in Sydney. Therefore, I

0:02:57.630 --> 0:02:58.830
<v Speaker 2>flew back.

0:02:58.650 --> 0:03:04.230
<v Speaker 5>And forward from 12 times, 14 times or something like

0:03:04.270 --> 0:03:06.700
<v Speaker 5>that in order to go to this course and to

0:03:06.750 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 5>do the training and then to do the, there was

0:03:09.180 --> 0:03:10.980
<v Speaker 5>a lot of simulations that you do.

0:03:11.820 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 2>And it was fascinating. I did it for two reasons.

0:03:15.220 --> 0:03:17.620
<v Speaker 2>One is because I really wanted to understand mediation. And

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:19.980
<v Speaker 2>two is because I actually do some of my best

0:03:20.100 --> 0:03:24.530
<v Speaker 2>writing and thinking on planes. So I actually forced myself

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:28.340
<v Speaker 2>because it's five hours one way. So I therefore, it

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.339
<v Speaker 2>actually was as I was thinking and writing about this

0:03:31.380 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 2>book and it gave me something like 50 hours of

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 2>nonstop writing to be able to write. So a lot

0:03:37.150 --> 0:03:38.809
<v Speaker 2>of this book was written on the plane going back

0:03:38.830 --> 0:03:40.230
<v Speaker 2>and forth between Sydney and Melbourne.

0:03:41.340 --> 0:03:42.860
<v Speaker 4>Oh my God, between Sydney and Perth.

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Sydney and Perth, sorry.

0:03:43.580 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Sydney and Perth, yeah. Sydney and Perth, yes.

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.839
<v Speaker 4>Wow, that's nuts. I've also done a lot of writing

0:03:48.020 --> 0:03:49.580
<v Speaker 4>on that flight from Melbourne to Perth.

0:03:49.740 --> 0:03:50.060
<v Speaker 1>Really?

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:51.650
<v Speaker 4>It's so good.

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:52.570
<v Speaker 5>It's five hours.

0:03:52.890 --> 0:03:57.430
<v Speaker 2>There's something about planes for me that just is unfiltered

0:03:57.450 --> 0:04:00.430
<v Speaker 2>thinking time. And I think I can do twice as

0:04:00.490 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 2>much work in plane hours than I do on earth hours.

0:04:05.220 --> 0:04:07.140
<v Speaker 2>It is really quite extraordinary. I do so much of

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.220
<v Speaker 2>my writing on planes. So, why not? It's an excellent,

0:04:10.300 --> 0:04:14.060
<v Speaker 2>excellent course. And I interviewed for the book, the professor

0:04:14.420 --> 0:04:17.820
<v Speaker 2>and the doctor that taught the course in mediation. And

0:04:17.860 --> 0:04:19.540
<v Speaker 2>it was really fascinating because there was a lot of

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 2>simulations that you do. So, you learn a lot of

0:04:21.900 --> 0:04:25.020
<v Speaker 2>the theory and the practice. And then you do hours

0:04:25.060 --> 0:04:29.540
<v Speaker 2>and hours of really hands-on simulations with everyone else who's

0:04:29.580 --> 0:04:31.900
<v Speaker 2>doing the course. And it's fascinating because you get to

0:04:31.940 --> 0:04:34.830
<v Speaker 2>be on all sides of mediation. So you get to

0:04:34.870 --> 0:04:37.970
<v Speaker 2>be people in conflict, you get to be the people

0:04:38.010 --> 0:04:41.969
<v Speaker 2>mediating the conflict. And it taught me, I think the

0:04:42.010 --> 0:04:46.890
<v Speaker 2>biggest lesson I learned from mediation was the role of listening,

0:04:47.570 --> 0:04:49.790
<v Speaker 2>which is a big part of conflict and how to

0:04:49.810 --> 0:04:52.210
<v Speaker 2>get better at it. And the role of actually active

0:04:52.250 --> 0:04:56.779
<v Speaker 2>listening and the role of really just trying to stop

0:04:57.060 --> 0:04:59.799
<v Speaker 2>and listen to what somebody has to say and allow

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.060
<v Speaker 2>other people to come to their own conclusions rather than

0:05:03.100 --> 0:05:04.700
<v Speaker 2>going there and trying to solve everyone's problems.

0:05:04.990 --> 0:05:09.469
<v Speaker 4>I always thought it'd be so stressful being a mediator.

0:05:09.529 --> 0:05:14.010
<v Speaker 4>I get really stressed being around people in conflict. What

0:05:14.270 --> 0:05:18.540
<v Speaker 4>strategies did you get to manage that comfortable feeling that

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.940
<v Speaker 4>I think most people feel when they're in amongst conflict?

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:24.099
<v Speaker 2>The reason why I was drawn to this topic is

0:05:24.140 --> 0:05:27.780
<v Speaker 2>because I'm also uncomfortable around conflict. It is something that

0:05:27.940 --> 0:05:31.070
<v Speaker 2>I think it is so hard and so messy and

0:05:31.110 --> 0:05:33.730
<v Speaker 2>so emotional. And it normally involves people that you love

0:05:33.790 --> 0:05:36.370
<v Speaker 2>dearly or people that you work with or sometimes people

0:05:36.390 --> 0:05:40.310
<v Speaker 2>that you really dislike. But there's a lot of emotions involved.

0:05:40.870 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 2>And the subtitle of my book is How to Get

0:05:43.980 --> 0:05:47.900
<v Speaker 2>Better at Conflict. And the sad, hard truth is the

0:05:48.180 --> 0:05:51.940
<v Speaker 2>only way to get better at it is by doing it. So,

0:05:51.980 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 2>the only way if you feel uncomfortable in conflict, if

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 2>you feel that mediation just gives you the ick and

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.179
<v Speaker 2>you really want to run away from it. The only

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.070
<v Speaker 2>solution to get better at it is by actually doing it.

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 2>So by becoming a nationally accredited mediator, for me, it

0:06:07.900 --> 0:06:11.450
<v Speaker 2>was how do I dive headfirst into this? And the

0:06:11.470 --> 0:06:13.969
<v Speaker 2>more I did it, the more I did it outside

0:06:14.010 --> 0:06:17.820
<v Speaker 2>the course, the more I understood it, the better I

0:06:17.980 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 2>felt about it because I could view things almost objectively,

0:06:21.900 --> 0:06:25.340
<v Speaker 2>almost try to remove some of the emotions because all

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.980
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden I understood a bit more about the topic.

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:32.350
<v Speaker 2>I knew that's what's happening in that process. And I

0:06:32.390 --> 0:06:34.550
<v Speaker 2>even think about this in my personal life because this

0:06:34.630 --> 0:06:36.930
<v Speaker 2>book is ostensibly about how to get better at conflict

0:06:37.070 --> 0:06:38.950
<v Speaker 2>at work because I spend a lot of my time

0:06:38.990 --> 0:06:41.650
<v Speaker 2>thinking about work. But the skills then of how to

0:06:41.730 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 2>actually do that in my personal life. And there's moments

0:06:44.820 --> 0:06:48.130
<v Speaker 2>then when I've had big arguments with my husband. And

0:06:48.150 --> 0:06:52.190
<v Speaker 2>I can feel all of these emotions overtaking me. And

0:06:52.470 --> 0:06:56.349
<v Speaker 2>researchers call it emotional hijacking or amygdala hijacking. And in

0:06:56.370 --> 0:06:59.590
<v Speaker 2>the past, that would happen to me. And now when

0:06:59.610 --> 0:07:02.270
<v Speaker 2>it happens, I'm quite objective about it. I almost view

0:07:02.310 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 2>it scientifically. I'm like, oh, wow, that's fascinating.

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.260
<v Speaker 5>Oh, God. So why do I feel so?

0:07:08.339 --> 0:07:09.420
<v Speaker 2>Why can't I speak right now?

0:07:09.460 --> 0:07:10.060
<v Speaker 5>What's going on?

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.980
<v Speaker 2>And it doesn't stop the emotions. but it just allows

0:07:13.020 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 2>you to understand it a little bit better.

0:07:14.700 --> 0:07:18.020
<v Speaker 1>Are there any specific tactics that you find yourself now

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>going to, like, say, when you're in conflict with, let's say,

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>with your husband?

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:28.260
<v Speaker 4>Because I know that there's this great framework in the book,

0:07:28.300 --> 0:07:30.670
<v Speaker 4>which we'll get into, but just sort of one or

0:07:30.710 --> 0:07:34.990
<v Speaker 4>two tactical things that have become go-to strategies for you.

0:07:35.150 --> 0:07:39.430
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and there's loads. And the first one is box-breathing.

0:07:40.010 --> 0:07:43.210
<v Speaker 2>which I think is something that is just to calm

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 2>your nervous system down. So box breathing is where you

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:47.420
<v Speaker 2>breathe in for a certain period of time, hold it

0:07:47.460 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 2>for a certain period of time, breathe out for a

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 2>certain period of time, hold it for a certain period

0:07:50.940 --> 0:07:53.500
<v Speaker 2>of time. I do it for five seconds each time

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 2>and I think of it like a box when it

0:07:55.260 --> 0:07:57.660
<v Speaker 2>goes around. And I love that. I do that all

0:07:57.680 --> 0:07:59.980
<v Speaker 2>the time. No one needs to know I'm doing that

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:01.940
<v Speaker 2>when I'm box breathing. So when I'm arguing with my

0:08:01.990 --> 0:08:04.450
<v Speaker 2>husband and my emotions are going crazy, I can just

0:08:06.980 --> 0:08:08.990
<v Speaker 2>box breathe and he has no idea what I'm doing

0:08:09.010 --> 0:08:10.190
<v Speaker 2>because no one can see.

0:08:10.830 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 3>So I do that a lot.

0:08:12.550 --> 0:08:14.940
<v Speaker 2>The second part was that I actually developed this really

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 2>simple framework, which we'll talk about later on, called CLEAR,

0:08:17.540 --> 0:08:20.700
<v Speaker 2>which stands for Clarify, Listen, Explore, Align and Reset. I

0:08:20.740 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 2>said that really quickly.

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 5>We'll get to that later.

0:08:23.180 --> 0:08:26.550
<v Speaker 2>But I do go through that checklist in my head

0:08:27.190 --> 0:08:29.110
<v Speaker 2>and I try to figure out where I'm up to.

0:08:29.590 --> 0:08:33.770
<v Speaker 2>And that to me is quite revolutionary because up until then,

0:08:33.910 --> 0:08:37.830
<v Speaker 2>I didn't have any process. It was just how can

0:08:37.870 --> 0:08:39.980
<v Speaker 2>I hold on and get to the next moment without

0:08:40.740 --> 0:08:45.089
<v Speaker 2>completely losing it? or without losing my relationship or anything

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.469
<v Speaker 2>like that. So now I've got this little process in

0:08:47.510 --> 0:08:50.530
<v Speaker 2>my head that I go through. Of those steps, which

0:08:50.550 --> 0:08:53.569
<v Speaker 2>we'll get into later, the most important one is listen,

0:08:54.150 --> 0:08:57.470
<v Speaker 2>like properly listening. And so now when I'm in conflict,

0:08:57.730 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 2>I do something quite counterintuitive, which is that I try

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 2>not to interject, that I try to actually listen to

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:06.179
<v Speaker 2>what the other person is trying to say. It allows

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:09.199
<v Speaker 2>me to calm down a little bit and it allows

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:13.429
<v Speaker 2>the other person to feel heard which is literally almost

0:09:13.490 --> 0:09:15.570
<v Speaker 2>the idea of conflict sometimes. It's just how you get

0:09:15.590 --> 0:09:16.010
<v Speaker 2>to that point.

0:09:16.330 --> 0:09:20.250
<v Speaker 4>Let's go through the CLEAR steps, if you like, now.

0:09:20.630 --> 0:09:23.810
<v Speaker 4>So CLEAR is an acronym. Let's go through it. What

0:09:23.830 --> 0:09:25.469
<v Speaker 4>do we do? What's the process?

0:09:25.550 --> 0:09:27.770
<v Speaker 2>So let's start at the very first one, which is

0:09:27.830 --> 0:09:31.930
<v Speaker 2>clarify what matters. So the first C in CLEAR is

0:09:31.970 --> 0:09:36.750
<v Speaker 2>clarify what matters. And that is about preparing for conflict.

0:09:37.490 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Most of us think that conflict just happens to us.

0:09:40.450 --> 0:09:43.410
<v Speaker 2>Almost all the times we go into conflict, we can

0:09:43.470 --> 0:09:46.030
<v Speaker 2>predict it in advance. So we know if we're about

0:09:46.070 --> 0:09:47.910
<v Speaker 2>to go in and have a hard conversation with somebody.

0:09:48.410 --> 0:09:51.390
<v Speaker 2>We know if somebody we're dealing with is more prone

0:09:51.429 --> 0:09:55.150
<v Speaker 2>to conflict than not. We know if something's really emotional

0:09:55.210 --> 0:09:57.990
<v Speaker 2>important to us that it's going to be potentially create conflict.

0:09:58.410 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 2>So all these moments about clarify. what actually matters before

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.479
<v Speaker 2>you go into it. That involves understanding what type of

0:10:05.500 --> 0:10:08.340
<v Speaker 2>person you are when you go into conflict, what type

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:11.250
<v Speaker 2>of person the other person is. And it evolves this

0:10:11.410 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 2>really simple framework, which I developed for the book called

0:10:14.340 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 2>the four terrains of conflict, which is basically understanding two

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest variables that affect conflict, which is how

0:10:20.340 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 2>much trust you have with somebody and how aligned their

0:10:22.540 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 2>values are on that particular issue.

0:10:24.300 --> 0:10:25.530
<v Speaker 4>So that is the C.

0:10:25.820 --> 0:10:27.740
<v Speaker 2>That's the C, clarify what matters.

0:10:28.140 --> 0:10:31.500
<v Speaker 4>L is for listen. Now you talked about listening. How

0:10:31.540 --> 0:10:33.260
<v Speaker 4>do I know if I'm listening properly?

0:10:33.540 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:37.540
<v Speaker 2>So I call it listen generously. And that is to

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.719
<v Speaker 2>really separate what we think we do, which is, I

0:10:42.020 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 2>listen every day. I know how to listen. Don't tell

0:10:44.940 --> 0:10:48.540
<v Speaker 2>me what to do. Whereas listen generously is actually this

0:10:48.740 --> 0:10:51.780
<v Speaker 2>real step up. And listen generously is listening out for

0:10:51.900 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 2>what's really important when someone is speaking. And there's four

0:10:55.210 --> 0:10:58.350
<v Speaker 2>layers to this. The first one is what someone is saying,

0:10:58.710 --> 0:11:00.690
<v Speaker 2>which is their positions. So that's kind of like on

0:11:00.710 --> 0:11:04.060
<v Speaker 2>the surface. Underneath that is what they're not saying. which

0:11:04.100 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 2>is their emotions, which is kind of all the things

0:11:05.850 --> 0:11:09.630
<v Speaker 2>they're hiding. Underneath that is what they care about, which

0:11:09.670 --> 0:11:12.530
<v Speaker 2>is their interests. And underneath that is what they value,

0:11:12.790 --> 0:11:16.870
<v Speaker 2>which is their values. So all those things are really important,

0:11:16.890 --> 0:11:20.300
<v Speaker 2>those four layers of generous listening. I was lucky when

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.380
<v Speaker 2>I did research for this book to be able to

0:11:22.780 --> 0:11:25.660
<v Speaker 2>have access to so many amazing minds around the world.

0:11:25.940 --> 0:11:28.459
<v Speaker 2>So people, I went to Oxford University and spoke to

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 2>people that teach negotiation there. And I was able to

0:11:30.950 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 2>have dinner with Esther Perel, the psychotherapist. And one of

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 2>the things that I think is amazing, have you ever

0:11:36.710 --> 0:11:37.930
<v Speaker 2>seen her live?

0:11:38.250 --> 0:11:38.710
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:11:38.890 --> 0:11:40.230
<v Speaker 4>And I was with you, Tim.

0:11:40.290 --> 0:11:40.730
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:11:41.250 --> 0:11:43.630
<v Speaker 2>I was leading into that question. We went and saw

0:11:43.690 --> 0:11:45.410
<v Speaker 2>Esther together in Melbourne.

0:11:45.429 --> 0:11:45.849
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:11:45.970 --> 0:11:47.790
<v Speaker 2>And she was amazing. And one thing that she does

0:11:47.830 --> 0:11:50.150
<v Speaker 2>at the end of her shows is she asks, does

0:11:50.190 --> 0:11:54.270
<v Speaker 2>anyone have questions? And she does this, I almost call

0:11:54.290 --> 0:11:58.050
<v Speaker 2>it like a magic trick where she takes questions because

0:11:58.550 --> 0:12:01.300
<v Speaker 2>when Esther Perel says, does anyone have any questions? If

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 2>there's 5,000 people in the room, there's 5,000 hands that

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:05.660
<v Speaker 2>go up because everyone wants to ask her a question.

0:12:06.110 --> 0:12:09.090
<v Speaker 2>And so she takes maybe five or six questions. She

0:12:09.130 --> 0:12:13.630
<v Speaker 2>writes things down and then she answers all of the

0:12:13.670 --> 0:12:16.770
<v Speaker 2>questions at once by pulling together the common threads. It's

0:12:16.790 --> 0:12:21.050
<v Speaker 2>quite an amazing show of active listening. And I asked her,

0:12:21.090 --> 0:12:22.670
<v Speaker 2>I said, how do you do that? She looked me

0:12:22.710 --> 0:12:25.530
<v Speaker 2>straight in the eyes and she said, you have to surrender.

0:12:26.540 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 2>This idea of being when you listen to somebody, The

0:12:29.670 --> 0:12:32.620
<v Speaker 2>last thing we're doing in our mind is surrendering. We

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:36.380
<v Speaker 2>are overthinking. We are trying to come up with an

0:12:36.420 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 2>answer ourselves. We are trying to empathize by relating the

0:12:40.460 --> 0:12:42.820
<v Speaker 2>story back to ourselves. All these things that we do.

0:12:43.700 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 2>And this idea then of listening is about surrendering and

0:12:49.450 --> 0:12:56.420
<v Speaker 2>listening is about actually not overthinking. Throughout the book, there's

0:12:56.460 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of like really practical exercises and two really,

0:13:00.860 --> 0:13:03.339
<v Speaker 2>really practical things that I now do when I listen

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:05.100
<v Speaker 2>is mirroring and looping.

0:13:05.420 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 4>Tell me about those.

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:08.870
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I know you love practical ideas. I know everyone

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.030
<v Speaker 2>who listens to this is like, great, Tim, I know

0:13:11.050 --> 0:13:13.390
<v Speaker 2>I need to listen. How the hell do I do it?

0:13:13.990 --> 0:13:16.910
<v Speaker 2>So mirroring is the very first step of when you

0:13:17.070 --> 0:13:19.830
<v Speaker 2>mirror somebody. And that's when you're having a conversation with

0:13:19.870 --> 0:13:23.490
<v Speaker 2>them mirroring basically means you take the last few words

0:13:23.510 --> 0:13:25.689
<v Speaker 2>that they said in a sentence and just repeat it

0:13:25.710 --> 0:13:28.190
<v Speaker 2>back to them. So, you mirror it back to them.

0:13:29.130 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 2>It sounds really simple. It sounds like you are not listening.

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:34.020
<v Speaker 2>And sometimes when I teach people this, they put their

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 2>hand up and they say, am I just like not

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:39.260
<v Speaker 2>listening because I'm just parroting back what they say? But

0:13:39.300 --> 0:13:41.500
<v Speaker 2>the aim of it is it's meant to stop you

0:13:41.910 --> 0:13:45.010
<v Speaker 2>from interjecting and stop you from overthinking and just give

0:13:45.450 --> 0:13:46.969
<v Speaker 2>you a chance to be able to engage in a

0:13:46.970 --> 0:13:49.189
<v Speaker 2>conversation with somebody or listen to what they have to

0:13:49.230 --> 0:13:52.900
<v Speaker 2>say without having to think the whole time. And that

0:13:52.940 --> 0:13:55.819
<v Speaker 2>actually allows you, quite ironically, the actual space to think.

0:13:55.900 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 4>And I must say, it sounds very artificial and feels

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 4>kind of artificial to do as a listener. But from

0:14:03.300 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 4>the person that has just spoken, it actually genuinely feels

0:14:06.900 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 4>like the person has really heard you.

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 5>Very much so.

0:14:10.179 --> 0:14:13.420
<v Speaker 2>And it's amazing that when you actually try this, no

0:14:13.500 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 2>one calls you out on it. It's a really simple

0:14:15.420 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 2>way of just making that person feel heard. That's one technique.

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:22.780
<v Speaker 2>And the next technique is then called looping. And looping

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 2>is that step further. So it takes this and it's

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.050
<v Speaker 2>if you think of to mirror somebody is like the

0:14:29.110 --> 0:14:32.150
<v Speaker 2>very first step. This is another step above. And looping

0:14:32.370 --> 0:14:35.110
<v Speaker 2>is you listen to somebody and then when they finish

0:14:35.150 --> 0:14:38.790
<v Speaker 2>a sentence or a paragraph, you paraphrase it back to them.

0:14:39.530 --> 0:14:42.500
<v Speaker 2>And then the most important aspect is you ask, is

0:14:42.540 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 2>that what you mean? Did I get that right? So

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:50.190
<v Speaker 2>you check with them. That gives them an opportunity to say, ah, yeah, almost.

0:14:50.290 --> 0:14:52.490
<v Speaker 2>It's not quite that. What it actually means is this.

0:14:53.070 --> 0:14:53.410
<v Speaker 1>Ah, okay.

0:14:53.430 --> 0:14:57.470
<v Speaker 2>So, what you're saying is this. Yeah, except that also

0:14:57.490 --> 0:14:59.670
<v Speaker 2>this thing's important. Okay. So, you're saying that this thing

0:14:59.710 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 2>here is really important. That's very important. Yeah, that's it.

0:15:03.030 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 2>And you want someone to get to the point where

0:15:04.380 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 2>they say, yep, that's it.

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:06.500
<v Speaker 3>Exactly.

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 2>That is listening to somebody. And that is a real

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.310
<v Speaker 2>amazing thing. Very simple technique that anyone can do in

0:15:13.330 --> 0:15:14.290
<v Speaker 2>order to become a better listener.

0:15:14.470 --> 0:15:14.730
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:15:14.770 --> 0:15:16.830
<v Speaker 4>So where do we go next in the clear process?

0:15:17.330 --> 0:15:17.550
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:15:17.630 --> 0:15:20.910
<v Speaker 2>So we have clarified what matters. Then we have listened generously.

0:15:21.450 --> 0:15:24.510
<v Speaker 2>The next step is to explore what's underneath. So this

0:15:24.550 --> 0:15:26.310
<v Speaker 2>is the part where most of us jump into when

0:15:26.330 --> 0:15:28.980
<v Speaker 2>we get into conflict with somebody. And explore what's underneath

0:15:29.390 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 2>means really understanding the conflict. One way you can do

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 2>that is something I learned a lot when I did

0:15:36.860 --> 0:15:41.170
<v Speaker 2>mediation is about separating positions from interests. So, position is

0:15:41.210 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 2>what someone says and the interest is their hopes, fears

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.460
<v Speaker 2>or concerns behind why they're saying that. So, if you

0:15:48.500 --> 0:15:50.740
<v Speaker 2>can do that, and this is a really simple exercise

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 2>that anyone can do if you're in conflict with somebody,

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.430
<v Speaker 2>it's thinking, okay, well, I say this here, this person

0:15:55.470 --> 0:15:59.010
<v Speaker 2>says this here, why are they saying that? What's their hopes, fears,

0:15:59.050 --> 0:16:02.350
<v Speaker 2>concerns or whys behind that? And that is the interests.

0:16:02.810 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 2>And as soon as you uncover what those interests are,

0:16:05.550 --> 0:16:08.990
<v Speaker 2>you can then have a really interesting discussion about them

0:16:09.020 --> 0:16:10.770
<v Speaker 2>because you're talking about what really matters.

0:16:11.270 --> 0:16:12.470
<v Speaker 4>What's an example of that?

0:16:12.950 --> 0:16:16.710
<v Speaker 2>So an example, there's a really great example that is

0:16:16.750 --> 0:16:19.250
<v Speaker 2>a kind of famous example they use to illustrate the

0:16:19.290 --> 0:16:21.770
<v Speaker 2>difference between positions and interests. And I'll give you it here.

0:16:22.390 --> 0:16:25.740
<v Speaker 2>So there's two people sitting in a library and they're

0:16:25.820 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 2>both studying and there's a window open next to them.

0:16:29.500 --> 0:16:31.700
<v Speaker 2>And one person wants the window shut and the other

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.020
<v Speaker 2>person wants the window open. So they both got to

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.650
<v Speaker 2>the librarian. and they say, I want it shut. Other

0:16:36.670 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 2>person says, I want it closed. Librarian is quite smart

0:16:40.500 --> 0:16:43.340
<v Speaker 2>and asks them why they want it open or shut.

0:16:43.860 --> 0:16:46.140
<v Speaker 2>And one person says, well, I want it shut because

0:16:46.500 --> 0:16:49.010
<v Speaker 2>I am getting a draft in and the draft is

0:16:49.430 --> 0:16:51.710
<v Speaker 2>really annoying. And the other person says, well, I want

0:16:51.730 --> 0:16:54.250
<v Speaker 2>to open because I'm hot and I need some air

0:16:54.270 --> 0:16:57.550
<v Speaker 2>to come in. So librarian goes over to them, closes

0:16:57.580 --> 0:16:59.780
<v Speaker 2>the window, then walks across the other side of the

0:16:59.820 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 2>library and opens the window. All of a sudden, the

0:17:03.060 --> 0:17:04.959
<v Speaker 2>person who's hot is cooled down and the person who

0:17:04.980 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 2>doesn't like the draft doesn't have a draft directly on them.

0:17:08.310 --> 0:17:11.169
<v Speaker 2>So it's a really simple example of the position is

0:17:11.270 --> 0:17:13.649
<v Speaker 2>I want it shut, I want it open, but the

0:17:13.830 --> 0:17:16.669
<v Speaker 2>interest behind it, once you understand why someone wants to

0:17:16.730 --> 0:17:19.270
<v Speaker 2>do it, you can then actually solve the problem.

0:17:19.770 --> 0:17:21.940
<v Speaker 4>So is interest kind of like motivation?

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:26.530
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's hopes, fears, concerns and why's. So what's someone's hopes,

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.110
<v Speaker 2>what's their fears about it, what's their concern, or what's

0:17:29.130 --> 0:17:31.730
<v Speaker 2>the why behind it? And as soon as you can

0:17:31.850 --> 0:17:34.790
<v Speaker 2>uncover what that actually is, it's quite revolutionary when it

0:17:34.830 --> 0:17:39.050
<v Speaker 2>comes to anything, negotiation, conflict, any disagreement that you have.

0:17:39.790 --> 0:17:42.649
<v Speaker 2>It's something that I do myself a lot. So I

0:17:42.710 --> 0:17:46.230
<v Speaker 2>now actually interrogate myself when I say something. And it

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.139
<v Speaker 2>can be as simple as a boss saying to their

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.060
<v Speaker 2>staff member, I want that report on my desk by

0:17:52.140 --> 0:17:55.460
<v Speaker 2>Friday at five o'clock. That is a position. The interest

0:17:55.500 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 2>behind it is why. What is their hope, their fear,

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 2>their concern, or their why behind it? And if you

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:05.710
<v Speaker 2>interrogate that, you might find out that the boss has

0:18:05.770 --> 0:18:09.149
<v Speaker 2>to deliver a report to their boss on Monday and

0:18:09.190 --> 0:18:11.629
<v Speaker 2>they therefore don't want to seem dumb and they want

0:18:11.650 --> 0:18:13.409
<v Speaker 2>to get a promotion and they don't want to get

0:18:13.490 --> 0:18:15.850
<v Speaker 2>fired because they don't understand what's going on with their subordinates.

0:18:16.410 --> 0:18:19.210
<v Speaker 2>So as soon as you understand if that's the reason why,

0:18:19.930 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 2>That changes how you approach things and you realize that

0:18:23.340 --> 0:18:25.899
<v Speaker 2>it's not necessarily about a deadline or a time or

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:28.770
<v Speaker 2>what someone says. It's why they're saying it.

0:18:28.980 --> 0:18:33.020
<v Speaker 1>Coming up next, Tim shares the four symbols Amanda Knox

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>has tattooed on her arm. the research on how many

0:18:36.900 --> 0:18:40.940
<v Speaker 1>good moments a relationship needs for every bad one, and

0:18:41.060 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the advice he gave me before I had to let

0:18:44.300 --> 0:18:48.870
<v Speaker 1>people go in 2024. Plus, the one word he wants

0:18:48.910 --> 0:18:52.850
<v Speaker 1>you to use tonight. Oh, and one other thing. We

0:18:52.910 --> 0:18:56.929
<v Speaker 1>have made a Spotify playlist of our favorite How I

0:18:56.970 --> 0:19:01.940
<v Speaker 1>Work episodes on difficult conversations and giving hard feedback. So,

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>if you want more of this kind of stuff, there

0:19:04.580 --> 0:19:10.260
<v Speaker 1>is a link to that in the show notes. If

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for more tips to improve the way you

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:16.260
<v Speaker 1>work and live, I write a short weekly newsletter that

0:19:16.300 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>contains tactics I've discovered that have helped me personally.

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 3>You can sign up for that at amantha.com. That's amantha.com.

0:19:29.090 --> 0:19:32.190
<v Speaker 4>I imagine that sometimes interests can be quite hard to

0:19:32.430 --> 0:19:37.510
<v Speaker 4>uncover because they might be embarrassing or maybe seem unreasonable

0:19:37.630 --> 0:19:42.450
<v Speaker 4>or they're just private. How do we uncover someone's interests

0:19:42.550 --> 0:19:43.669
<v Speaker 4>when that's the case?

0:19:43.869 --> 0:19:46.290
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this is the part of exploring what's underneath

0:19:47.070 --> 0:19:51.620
<v Speaker 2>and this ties very much into listening. So someone's interests

0:19:52.130 --> 0:19:54.340
<v Speaker 2>generally will be uncovered the more you speak to them

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 2>and the more you listen to them. So if someone's

0:19:56.700 --> 0:19:58.820
<v Speaker 2>just yelling at each other and they're kind of going

0:19:58.859 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 2>back and forward, you're not really going to understand what

0:20:02.260 --> 0:20:04.500
<v Speaker 2>is behind it. But if you can say to somebody,

0:20:05.660 --> 0:20:08.330
<v Speaker 2>so why do you feel this way? How can we

0:20:08.350 --> 0:20:10.590
<v Speaker 2>come to a solution that's going to benefit both of us?

0:20:11.170 --> 0:20:13.590
<v Speaker 2>What's behind that? Why you feel this way? Whatever those

0:20:13.630 --> 0:20:17.210
<v Speaker 2>questions are, the more you can ask them that and

0:20:17.230 --> 0:20:19.949
<v Speaker 2>the more that you can allow them to speak is

0:20:20.030 --> 0:20:22.670
<v Speaker 2>when you're going to start uncovering someone's interests. That's why

0:20:22.710 --> 0:20:25.810
<v Speaker 2>I keep coming back to out of the clarify, listen, explore, align,

0:20:25.850 --> 0:20:30.210
<v Speaker 2>and reset. That listen part can almost solve anything because

0:20:30.250 --> 0:20:33.810
<v Speaker 2>the exploring what's underneath is not about you speaking. It's

0:20:33.830 --> 0:20:34.430
<v Speaker 2>about you listening.

0:20:34.790 --> 0:20:37.430
<v Speaker 4>Okay, let's move on to A, which stands for align.

0:20:37.490 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Align on a shared direction. So aligning on a shared

0:20:40.380 --> 0:20:44.140
<v Speaker 2>direction means understanding one of three things that you're looking

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.860
<v Speaker 2>for to see if there is some alignment. The first

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 2>one is if you have a shared understanding of what's happened.

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 2>The second one is if you have a shared intention

0:20:52.540 --> 0:20:54.300
<v Speaker 2>of where you want to get to. The third one

0:20:54.340 --> 0:20:56.659
<v Speaker 2>is if you have a shared commitment on how to

0:20:56.700 --> 0:20:59.379
<v Speaker 2>get there. So aligning on a shared direction doesn't mean

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 2>agreeing on everything. It just is of those three things, understanding, intention,

0:21:04.380 --> 0:21:08.300
<v Speaker 2>and commitment, is there some alignment you can find on those?

0:21:09.660 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 2>One of the most interesting chats I had for this

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:16.020
<v Speaker 2>book was with Amanda Knox. And for people who may

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 2>or may not know who Amanda Knox is, Amanda was

0:21:18.420 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 2>a 20-year-old American student who moved to Perugia in Italy

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.770
<v Speaker 2>to do a study abroad year. And she was falsely

0:21:25.830 --> 0:21:29.770
<v Speaker 2>accused of killing her flatmate, Meredith Kircher. It was probably

0:21:29.790 --> 0:21:35.070
<v Speaker 2>the biggest global media story for about five to 10 years.

0:21:35.150 --> 0:21:39.149
<v Speaker 2>This is about 15 years ago. And she said she

0:21:39.170 --> 0:21:41.689
<v Speaker 2>was innocent the whole time, but they put her in

0:21:41.790 --> 0:21:43.650
<v Speaker 2>jail for four years. She got convicted of the crime.

0:21:44.670 --> 0:21:45.020
<v Speaker 1>She left.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.260
<v Speaker 2>She went back to America, then was convicted again of

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 2>the crime while she was not there and sentenced another

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:54.230
<v Speaker 2>20 or 30 years in jail. Then it finally appealed

0:21:54.250 --> 0:21:56.250
<v Speaker 2>it to the Italian Supreme Court and she was exonerated.

0:21:56.830 --> 0:21:59.669
<v Speaker 2>So she spent, well, she's still spending almost all her

0:21:59.730 --> 0:22:03.630
<v Speaker 2>life now trying to undo the trauma that happened with that.

0:22:03.650 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 2>And there's one man in particular who was really responsible

0:22:07.820 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 2>for it. And his name was Giuliano. And he was

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 2>the chief prosecutor who spent over a decade just doggedly

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 2>pursuing her. And Amanda, despite all these differences... has forged

0:22:23.380 --> 0:22:27.369
<v Speaker 2>a relationship with this man. She therefore has these four

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:31.470
<v Speaker 2>little symbols tattooed on her arm, which is her recipe

0:22:31.930 --> 0:22:36.190
<v Speaker 2>for how to have a difficult conversation with anybody. I

0:22:36.230 --> 0:22:38.190
<v Speaker 2>often think about this when I'm in conflict with somebody

0:22:38.290 --> 0:22:40.170
<v Speaker 2>and I think, okay, I've got nothing in common with them.

0:22:40.950 --> 0:22:43.689
<v Speaker 2>Then you think about Amanda Knox and the man who

0:22:43.770 --> 0:22:46.550
<v Speaker 2>put her in jail, and yet she's still able to

0:22:46.590 --> 0:22:49.189
<v Speaker 2>find something in common with them. The four symbols that

0:22:49.210 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 2>she has The first one is two overlapping circles, which

0:22:54.060 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 2>represent a Venn diagram. So no matter who they are,

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:01.100
<v Speaker 2>you can always find something common with somebody. So for Amanda,

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 2>she realized that she'd been persecuted by the media and

0:23:04.420 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 2>had felt that her image was taken out of control.

0:23:07.300 --> 0:23:09.940
<v Speaker 2>And she realized that the chief prosecutor had also been

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.540
<v Speaker 2>persecuted by the media. He'd spent a lot of time

0:23:12.580 --> 0:23:16.260
<v Speaker 2>with the media, particularly when she was exonerated. They said

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:18.619
<v Speaker 2>he was wrong and he did the wrong thing. So

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 2>that She was able to bond with him over that.

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 2>The second symbol is a knight's helmet, which represents the

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:28.210
<v Speaker 2>idea of steel man in an argument. So steel man

0:23:28.250 --> 0:23:30.250
<v Speaker 2>in an argument is the opposite of straw man in

0:23:30.270 --> 0:23:32.429
<v Speaker 2>an argument. And straw man in an argument is what

0:23:32.450 --> 0:23:36.090
<v Speaker 2>happens when you take the weakest possible version of someone's

0:23:36.230 --> 0:23:38.740
<v Speaker 2>argument and you argue against that. It's called to find

0:23:38.780 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 2>a straw man. So steel man is finding the strongest

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:45.459
<v Speaker 2>possible reason why someone you're in conflict with believes what

0:23:45.500 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 2>they do and arguing against that. So even to the

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.500
<v Speaker 2>extent of arguing their case for them, so you really

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 2>understand it. The third symbol is a symbol of a heart,

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:58.379
<v Speaker 2>which means you have to do it with compassion. And

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:02.070
<v Speaker 2>the fourth symbol is the Greek symbol for delta, which

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:06.210
<v Speaker 2>represents change. And that idea is no matter who you're

0:24:06.230 --> 0:24:09.389
<v Speaker 2>in conflict with, if you expect someone else to change,

0:24:09.930 --> 0:24:13.189
<v Speaker 2>then you need to be willing to change yourself. So

0:24:13.210 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 2>those four symbols, I think they're just amazing. And I

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.790
<v Speaker 2>talked to her about those tattoos because... They really show

0:24:18.850 --> 0:24:22.780
<v Speaker 2>how anyone can have a difficult conversation with anyone in

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 2>the world, including someone that's pursued you.

0:24:24.740 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>For a decade.

0:24:25.580 --> 0:24:29.620
<v Speaker 4>I find that so powerful because I think about conflicts

0:24:29.660 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 4>that I've been in and thinking, there's no way that

0:24:31.859 --> 0:24:34.970
<v Speaker 4>I could find common ground with them. But thinking about

0:24:34.990 --> 0:24:38.669
<v Speaker 4>that Amanda Knox example, I mean, if she can do it,

0:24:39.330 --> 0:24:41.869
<v Speaker 4>then we can all do it. Tell me about the

0:24:41.950 --> 0:24:43.350
<v Speaker 4>final step in the process.

0:24:43.609 --> 0:24:47.220
<v Speaker 2>So the final step, the R in CLEAR is reset

0:24:47.260 --> 0:24:50.609
<v Speaker 2>your story. And what reset your story means is I

0:24:50.650 --> 0:24:55.170
<v Speaker 2>intentionally use the word story in this because every conflict

0:24:55.210 --> 0:24:57.590
<v Speaker 2>is a story that we tell ourselves. It's a story

0:24:57.609 --> 0:25:00.949
<v Speaker 2>that I tell myself about why I'm right and I

0:25:01.010 --> 0:25:03.690
<v Speaker 2>tell myself about why the other person's wrong and they

0:25:03.710 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 2>are also telling themselves their story. So I use this

0:25:06.900 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 2>idea of resetting your story because it's not necessarily about

0:25:10.580 --> 0:25:13.180
<v Speaker 2>tying up with a nice, neat bow and saying, isn't

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 2>that wonderful? We all agree because most conflicts are a

0:25:16.540 --> 0:25:19.580
<v Speaker 2>lot messier than that. So Reset Your Story looks at

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.689
<v Speaker 2>there's basically three outcomes that can come with a conflict.

0:25:23.170 --> 0:25:26.109
<v Speaker 2>The first is to resolve it, which is great. The

0:25:26.150 --> 0:25:28.910
<v Speaker 2>second one is to repeat and go back and do

0:25:28.970 --> 0:25:31.190
<v Speaker 2>some of those steps again. So go back and listen,

0:25:31.570 --> 0:25:34.540
<v Speaker 2>go back and clarify, go back and explore, go back

0:25:34.580 --> 0:25:38.459
<v Speaker 2>and align. And the last step is to release. And

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 2>release is just sometimes when you get to the end

0:25:41.780 --> 0:25:45.210
<v Speaker 2>of a conflict, it's insoluble. You're not going to solve

0:25:45.300 --> 0:25:48.460
<v Speaker 2>it and you just need to release physically or emotionally.

0:25:48.900 --> 0:25:52.540
<v Speaker 2>You just need to sometimes go into a car and

0:25:52.580 --> 0:25:57.060
<v Speaker 2>scream or you need to hit something, not somebody, hit

0:25:57.100 --> 0:25:59.179
<v Speaker 2>something or you need to break something or just that

0:25:59.220 --> 0:26:02.500
<v Speaker 2>emotion of just release. I think it's important when you

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 2>get to the end of a conflict, even sometimes when

0:26:04.859 --> 0:26:07.940
<v Speaker 2>you say to somebody, let's agree to disagree. That's a

0:26:08.060 --> 0:26:09.780
<v Speaker 2>form of releasing a conflict.

0:26:10.260 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 4>Is that a failure?

0:26:11.500 --> 0:26:12.870
<v Speaker 3>Not at all. Not at all.

0:26:12.950 --> 0:26:15.649
<v Speaker 2>Some conflicts are soluble. I mean, they can be solved

0:26:15.730 --> 0:26:19.659
<v Speaker 2>and some are insoluble. And one of the biggest lessons

0:26:19.820 --> 0:26:22.180
<v Speaker 2>I learned about conflict in all of this is that

0:26:22.300 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 2>sometimes walking away is actually the best thing you can do.

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:30.330
<v Speaker 2>Particularly when emotions are heightened, you can temporarily walk away

0:26:30.420 --> 0:26:33.450
<v Speaker 2>or you temporarily box breathe or remove yourself from the

0:26:33.470 --> 0:26:37.060
<v Speaker 2>situation until you calm down. But other times... There are

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:40.100
<v Speaker 2>conflicts that you're in conflict with somebody and it's just

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.340
<v Speaker 2>unhealthy and it's not going anywhere. The best thing to

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:45.899
<v Speaker 2>do is just walk away. There's no shame in that.

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.750
<v Speaker 4>So interesting. It reminds me of, you know, the Gottmans,

0:26:50.030 --> 0:26:51.630
<v Speaker 4>the relationship experts.

0:26:51.670 --> 0:26:51.850
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:26:52.290 --> 0:26:56.010
<v Speaker 4>They talk about how with all the kind of conflict

0:26:56.050 --> 0:26:59.370
<v Speaker 4>and arguments that happen in a marriage, it's something like

0:26:59.470 --> 0:27:02.250
<v Speaker 4>two-thirds will never be resolved, right?

0:27:02.690 --> 0:27:03.590
<v Speaker 3>Did you come across that?

0:27:03.609 --> 0:27:05.389
<v Speaker 2>I didn't come across that style. I came across a

0:27:05.430 --> 0:27:09.870
<v Speaker 2>lot of their thinking around the ratio, the magic ratio

0:27:09.890 --> 0:27:13.689
<v Speaker 2>of the number of good interactions versus bad interactions. So,

0:27:13.710 --> 0:27:16.730
<v Speaker 2>the golden ratio done by the Gottmans looked at how

0:27:16.890 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 2>many positive to negative interactions you have in a conflict.

0:27:20.340 --> 0:27:23.139
<v Speaker 2>And generally, it found that you should have five positive

0:27:23.180 --> 0:27:27.659
<v Speaker 2>interactions for every one negative interaction. And it's been quite

0:27:27.780 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 2>amazing to look at Well, one, how they did that

0:27:30.859 --> 0:27:34.460
<v Speaker 2>research was they would sit in on couples fighting and

0:27:34.619 --> 0:27:36.620
<v Speaker 2>spend a lot of time in their practice doing this.

0:27:37.140 --> 0:27:40.140
<v Speaker 2>And the second thing is, I think, just understanding that

0:27:40.619 --> 0:27:44.270
<v Speaker 2>there's going to be negative reactions in a relationship, every relationship.

0:27:44.380 --> 0:27:47.570
<v Speaker 2>And there's nothing wrong with that. And I think for

0:27:47.710 --> 0:27:50.830
<v Speaker 2>people like you and I, who grew up in relatively

0:27:50.869 --> 0:27:54.330
<v Speaker 2>conflict-averse households, I'm putting words into your mouth here, but

0:27:54.670 --> 0:27:57.830
<v Speaker 2>to view conflict as a sign that something was wrong.

0:27:58.730 --> 0:28:01.770
<v Speaker 2>And a sign that it meant that you should never

0:28:01.790 --> 0:28:04.580
<v Speaker 2>have conflict or you shouldn't raise your voices. When in fact,

0:28:05.170 --> 0:28:08.060
<v Speaker 2>raised voices and conflict is a sign that something's really important.

0:28:08.500 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Something matters in that moment. And that is something that

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.540
<v Speaker 2>I've had to kind of reframe how I think about conflict.

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.070
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I do love that reframe. And I think it's

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:21.050
<v Speaker 4>also interesting just to think that the aim of a

0:28:21.109 --> 0:28:24.580
<v Speaker 4>good conflict or a good discussion is not to resolve it.

0:28:24.750 --> 0:28:28.570
<v Speaker 4>Because as you said, some conflicts are not actually resolvable.

0:28:28.710 --> 0:28:31.430
<v Speaker 4>And I think that that's quite useful just to think

0:28:31.470 --> 0:28:34.369
<v Speaker 4>about the Gottmans and their research. A lot of the

0:28:34.410 --> 0:28:38.030
<v Speaker 4>fights that we have in a relationship, they're never solved,

0:28:38.590 --> 0:28:39.330
<v Speaker 4>but that's okay.

0:28:39.370 --> 0:28:39.610
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:28:39.710 --> 0:28:42.430
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the reason why I called the book Clear

0:28:42.630 --> 0:28:46.300
<v Speaker 2>in Tension is because we all have tension in our lives.

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 2>We all have tension in our relationships. We all have

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:52.420
<v Speaker 2>tension in every work colleague that we have. And being

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:55.910
<v Speaker 2>clear about what that tension is does not mean resolving it,

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 2>does not mean it's going to go away. It means

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:02.570
<v Speaker 2>that everyone is really cognizant of what is going on.

0:29:03.310 --> 0:29:06.650
<v Speaker 2>And the best stuff happens in tension because you want

0:29:06.730 --> 0:29:10.210
<v Speaker 2>someone pulling in one direction and someone else pulling another direction.

0:29:10.870 --> 0:29:13.370
<v Speaker 2>And you want that to be as fair as possible,

0:29:13.550 --> 0:29:17.290
<v Speaker 2>as above board, as explainable, as discussed. And then you

0:29:17.310 --> 0:29:19.450
<v Speaker 2>can come to these really good solutions in the middle.

0:29:19.650 --> 0:29:21.630
<v Speaker 4>Has your marriage improved since writing this book?

0:29:21.650 --> 0:29:22.910
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yeah. Yeah, 100%. I spent about.

0:29:24.810 --> 0:29:28.110
<v Speaker 2>Two to three years writing this book. And I then

0:29:28.210 --> 0:29:32.250
<v Speaker 2>put almost all these things into practice, from listening to

0:29:32.970 --> 0:29:36.830
<v Speaker 2>arguing better, to understanding these emotions that go inside. I'm

0:29:36.870 --> 0:29:39.690
<v Speaker 2>still not perfect, and we have conflict all the time.

0:29:40.030 --> 0:29:41.550
<v Speaker 2>but I'm really aware of it now.

0:29:41.850 --> 0:29:46.380
<v Speaker 4>You talk about conflict seekers versus conflict avoiders and how

0:29:46.970 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 4>when you started researching and writing the book, you were

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:54.820
<v Speaker 4>definitely a conflict avoider and you've moved more on that

0:29:54.860 --> 0:30:00.030
<v Speaker 4>continuum towards the conflict seeker side of things. Can you first,

0:30:00.110 --> 0:30:04.370
<v Speaker 4>I guess, share how many people are conflict avoiders, which

0:30:04.410 --> 0:30:07.790
<v Speaker 4>I think is pretty self-explanatory what that is versus conflict seekers.

0:30:08.010 --> 0:30:11.830
<v Speaker 2>So research says that around 80% of us will avoid

0:30:11.890 --> 0:30:13.190
<v Speaker 2>conflict if given the opportunity.

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 4>That's so high, isn't it?

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 5>It's really high.

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:18.020
<v Speaker 2>And it's for good reason. It's got to do with

0:30:18.220 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 2>most of us seek harmony. Being a conflict avoider doesn't

0:30:22.340 --> 0:30:24.660
<v Speaker 2>have to be a terrible thing because it also shows

0:30:24.740 --> 0:30:28.340
<v Speaker 2>that you enjoy harmony and working with other people. Where

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 2>it becomes toxic is if you only ever avoid conflict

0:30:32.780 --> 0:30:35.510
<v Speaker 2>and you never lean into it. The other end of

0:30:35.550 --> 0:30:39.450
<v Speaker 2>the scale, the conflict-seeking scale, is at the very, very

0:30:39.530 --> 0:30:44.590
<v Speaker 2>pointy end, what's known as conflict entrepreneurs. And I love

0:30:44.870 --> 0:30:48.170
<v Speaker 2>the term conflict entrepreneur because it basically says someone who

0:30:48.210 --> 0:30:50.330
<v Speaker 2>can make something out of nothing, which is what an

0:30:50.350 --> 0:30:53.620
<v Speaker 2>entrepreneur does. The problem is you don't want to be

0:30:53.630 --> 0:30:56.220
<v Speaker 2>a conflict entrepreneur and you don't want to be married

0:30:56.260 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 2>to one. You don't want to work with somebody. Because

0:30:58.700 --> 0:31:02.460
<v Speaker 2>it's draining. Somewhere in the middle is where most of

0:31:02.530 --> 0:31:06.170
<v Speaker 2>us are. And I started further down the end than

0:31:06.190 --> 0:31:08.610
<v Speaker 2>I am now. You asked the question around, is my husband,

0:31:08.670 --> 0:31:11.190
<v Speaker 2>is my relationship with my husband better? It is. But also,

0:31:11.210 --> 0:31:13.470
<v Speaker 2>if you asked him, it's probably sometimes just like, just

0:31:13.590 --> 0:31:15.570
<v Speaker 2>shut up and agree with me, you know, like you

0:31:15.590 --> 0:31:18.810
<v Speaker 2>used to.

0:31:18.830 --> 0:31:22.770
<v Speaker 4>Now, you were a business owner of Junkie Media for many,

0:31:22.790 --> 0:31:24.870
<v Speaker 4>many years, I think over a decade, 15 years.

0:31:24.890 --> 0:31:25.350
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, 15 years.

0:31:26.010 --> 0:31:29.410
<v Speaker 4>And you were very much a conflict avoider in that

0:31:29.450 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 4>period of time. Looking back now with everything that you know,

0:31:33.140 --> 0:31:34.610
<v Speaker 4>what do you think that cost you?

0:31:35.020 --> 0:31:41.140
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was conflict daft. I just didn't know what

0:31:41.180 --> 0:31:45.070
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know. My job was moderating a lot of

0:31:45.110 --> 0:31:48.430
<v Speaker 2>people's conflict. So I was doing mediation without any training.

0:31:49.370 --> 0:31:49.970
<v Speaker 5>I was.

0:31:50.910 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 2>trying to people please and make other people feel good

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 2>because that's what I like doing. I like harmony. It

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:01.180
<v Speaker 2>took me a while to have confidence to be able

0:32:01.220 --> 0:32:03.460
<v Speaker 2>to speak up and be able to say what I

0:32:03.500 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 2>wanted to say. I remember very early meetings where I would,

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 2>in fact, the book is dedicated to anyone who's ever

0:32:10.580 --> 0:32:14.010
<v Speaker 2>choked on swallowed words. And what I mean by that

0:32:14.050 --> 0:32:16.490
<v Speaker 2>is someone who sits in a meeting or sits in

0:32:16.510 --> 0:32:20.130
<v Speaker 2>a relationship and you want to say something, but you

0:32:20.170 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 2>don't say it. And I can remember many meetings when

0:32:23.420 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 2>I was in my 20s of sitting there and just

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 2>being scared that the microphone was going to come around

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:31.610
<v Speaker 2>to me and someone would say, Tim, what do you

0:32:31.650 --> 0:32:32.250
<v Speaker 2>think about this?

0:32:33.690 --> 0:32:34.110
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:32:34.130 --> 0:32:36.110
<v Speaker 2>I kind of, yeah, I agree with what you said.

0:32:36.130 --> 0:32:40.710
<v Speaker 2>That is conflict averse. That is not wanting to actually

0:32:40.750 --> 0:32:42.930
<v Speaker 2>say what you think because you don't want to upset

0:32:43.430 --> 0:32:46.300
<v Speaker 2>anyone else in the room. So it took a lot

0:32:46.380 --> 0:32:50.710
<v Speaker 2>of just figuring things out, a lot of mistakes, a

0:32:50.770 --> 0:32:53.690
<v Speaker 2>lot of trying to mediate but not doing it very well.

0:32:54.610 --> 0:32:57.770
<v Speaker 2>And that is one of the reasons that I had

0:32:57.790 --> 0:32:58.430
<v Speaker 2>to write this book.

0:32:58.930 --> 0:33:02.780
<v Speaker 4>Was there a point where you realized, I am actually

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:07.380
<v Speaker 4>moving on this spectrum from being a conflict avoider more

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:10.740
<v Speaker 4>towards the conflict seeker? And was there a moment where

0:33:10.770 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 4>you were like, huh? feels different.

0:33:13.700 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah.

0:33:14.700 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it was as the concept of clear started developing.

0:33:19.420 --> 0:33:22.900
<v Speaker 2>And then the more I researched it, people started asking

0:33:22.940 --> 0:33:25.910
<v Speaker 2>me for advice on what to do. And my advice

0:33:25.970 --> 0:33:28.770
<v Speaker 2>was always, you just have to be as clear as

0:33:28.810 --> 0:33:31.430
<v Speaker 2>you can here. So even if it hurts, even if

0:33:32.090 --> 0:33:34.190
<v Speaker 2>you're saying to somebody that you've been with for 10 years,

0:33:35.730 --> 0:33:38.010
<v Speaker 2>I don't like what you do, or this has really

0:33:38.030 --> 0:33:40.670
<v Speaker 2>affected me in a bad way, being as clear as

0:33:40.730 --> 0:33:43.590
<v Speaker 2>you can about it. And I remember there was moments

0:33:43.610 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 2>when I was giving other people advice and telling people

0:33:46.380 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 2>what they should do. And then I realized I was

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 2>having some conflict in work situations. And instead of sending

0:33:53.380 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 2>someone a text or sending them an email and not

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.020
<v Speaker 2>saying what I wanted to say, I just picked up

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:02.459
<v Speaker 2>the phone and say, hey, I've just got to have

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:04.940
<v Speaker 2>a tricky conversation with you. And as soon as you

0:34:04.980 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 2>get that sentence out, I have to have a hard conversation.

0:34:07.780 --> 0:34:10.580
<v Speaker 2>I've got a tricky conversation. Whatever it is, whatever language

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:12.940
<v Speaker 2>you want to use, as soon as you say that

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.500
<v Speaker 2>in the first sentence of somebody, that's it. It's game on.

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:19.140
<v Speaker 2>You can talk about it. You've kind of like set

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:20.950
<v Speaker 2>the scene a little bit and it's so much easier

0:34:20.989 --> 0:34:23.109
<v Speaker 2>to say. So what I often tell people to do

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:26.589
<v Speaker 2>is just rehearse that first line. So think through what's

0:34:26.630 --> 0:34:28.969
<v Speaker 2>the first thing you want to say. I've had to

0:34:29.010 --> 0:34:31.069
<v Speaker 2>make a lot of people redundant over the years because

0:34:31.110 --> 0:34:33.970
<v Speaker 2>we ran a media company during a time when media

0:34:34.010 --> 0:34:36.850
<v Speaker 2>went through lots of changes. And I would sit someone

0:34:36.890 --> 0:34:40.489
<v Speaker 2>down and I would say, hi, Amantha, there's some bad

0:34:40.530 --> 0:34:43.190
<v Speaker 2>news I've got to tell you about today. And I'll

0:34:43.210 --> 0:34:45.969
<v Speaker 2>get it out in the first sentence. That as soon

0:34:46.010 --> 0:34:47.609
<v Speaker 2>as you got it out in the first sentence, then

0:34:47.650 --> 0:34:49.370
<v Speaker 2>it was out. It wasn't like a, hey, how are

0:34:49.410 --> 0:34:49.770
<v Speaker 2>you going?

0:34:49.790 --> 0:34:50.530
<v Speaker 3>Ah, good.

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:51.819
<v Speaker 2>Ah, the weather's nice today, isn't it?

0:34:51.950 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Okay.

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:56.939
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, so there's something I think we should talk about.

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 2>It was just sit straight down and say, I've got

0:35:00.140 --> 0:35:01.700
<v Speaker 2>some unfortunate news I need to talk to you about today.

0:35:02.100 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know if you remember this, Tim, but

0:35:04.460 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 4>when I had to retrench some people in 2024, we

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:09.259
<v Speaker 4>went out for a coffee and I asked you for

0:35:09.300 --> 0:35:11.750
<v Speaker 4>advice and you gave me great advice. Do you remember that? Yeah,

0:35:11.790 --> 0:35:12.109
<v Speaker 4>I do.

0:35:12.310 --> 0:35:13.690
<v Speaker 2>I do. And it was a similar advice.

0:35:13.830 --> 0:35:15.230
<v Speaker 3>It absolutely was. It absolutely was.

0:35:15.350 --> 0:35:15.509
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:35:15.550 --> 0:35:16.810
<v Speaker 2>And did you use it? I did.

0:35:17.230 --> 0:35:17.390
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:35:17.750 --> 0:35:18.330
<v Speaker 4>And it really helped.

0:35:18.430 --> 0:35:19.330
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Great. Great.

0:35:20.010 --> 0:35:23.700
<v Speaker 2>It is something that doesn't make it any easier. It's

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:25.100
<v Speaker 2>still going to be emotional. It's still going to be

0:35:25.140 --> 0:35:27.980
<v Speaker 2>shitty to deliver that news. But if you can just

0:35:28.100 --> 0:35:31.100
<v Speaker 2>rehearse the opening line, that's all you need to do.

0:35:31.550 --> 0:35:34.189
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's also I often think about how

0:35:34.530 --> 0:35:37.090
<v Speaker 2>I would want to be treated in this situation. And

0:35:37.110 --> 0:35:40.149
<v Speaker 2>if someone had some bad news delivered to me, just

0:35:40.270 --> 0:35:42.250
<v Speaker 2>rip the bandaid off and come and tell me. You know,

0:35:42.290 --> 0:35:45.089
<v Speaker 2>if someone says there's something that I need to talk about,

0:35:45.110 --> 0:35:48.489
<v Speaker 2>if I sat down and said, hey, there's a bit

0:35:48.510 --> 0:35:50.319
<v Speaker 2>of a tricky conversation that we need to have right now.

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 2>All of a sudden I can prepare mentally. I can realize, okay,

0:35:54.420 --> 0:35:57.399
<v Speaker 2>adjust my tone, realize this is serious. So I'm glad

0:35:57.440 --> 0:35:58.240
<v Speaker 2>that advice worked.

0:35:58.540 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>It really did.

0:35:59.160 --> 0:35:59.779
<v Speaker 3>A few years ago.

0:35:59.800 --> 0:35:59.900
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:36:00.780 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 4>Now, my final question is, there is a favorite go-to

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:06.580
<v Speaker 4>word that you have for conflict.

0:36:07.219 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 3>What is that word?

0:36:08.300 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there is a really powerful word that we don't

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 2>use enough. Most of the time when we're in conflict,

0:36:14.140 --> 0:36:17.660
<v Speaker 2>we use words that are very accusatory. So we say,

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:20.940
<v Speaker 2>why did you do that? What's going on here?

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:22.700
<v Speaker 1>Where were you?

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:25.259
<v Speaker 2>And if you're at the receiving end of that, you

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:27.989
<v Speaker 2>feel defensive. As soon as someone says, why did you

0:36:28.010 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 2>do that, Amantha? What's your solution to this? It feels

0:36:31.980 --> 0:36:34.180
<v Speaker 2>really accusatory. Everyone has their backup. You're not going to

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 2>get anywhere. Whereas there's a really powerful word that if

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 2>you replace it and use this as many times as

0:36:39.980 --> 0:36:42.220
<v Speaker 2>possible when you're in conflict with somebody, it will change

0:36:42.260 --> 0:36:44.820
<v Speaker 2>the tamper of the conversation. And the word is how.

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:49.800
<v Speaker 2>It will change how the conversation goes. So examples of

0:36:49.820 --> 0:36:52.489
<v Speaker 2>this is, how can we come to a resolution here?

0:36:53.270 --> 0:36:55.370
<v Speaker 2>How am I supposed to do this if you're doing that?

0:36:56.969 --> 0:36:59.510
<v Speaker 2>how can we resolve this in a way that's fair

0:36:59.670 --> 0:37:02.330
<v Speaker 2>for both of us? Soon as you use the word how,

0:37:02.510 --> 0:37:06.169
<v Speaker 2>it has what researchers call forced empathy. So it makes

0:37:06.210 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 2>the other person co-opt them into solving a solution for me.

0:37:10.090 --> 0:37:12.190
<v Speaker 2>Because when I say how to you, all of a

0:37:12.210 --> 0:37:14.100
<v Speaker 2>sudden you think, oh, well, this is how we do it.

0:37:14.250 --> 0:37:16.590
<v Speaker 2>And you start telling me. And then we're co-creating a

0:37:16.610 --> 0:37:19.770
<v Speaker 2>solution together. That's what conflict management is. It's co-creating a

0:37:19.790 --> 0:37:24.170
<v Speaker 2>solution together. So there's one outtake for people listening to this.

0:37:24.770 --> 0:37:26.879
<v Speaker 2>It is next time you're in conflict, and it might

0:37:26.910 --> 0:37:29.420
<v Speaker 2>be tonight with your partner. It could be tomorrow with

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:33.380
<v Speaker 2>your boss. It might be next month with your mortal enemy.

0:37:34.500 --> 0:37:38.219
<v Speaker 2>Whoever it is, just use the word how as many

0:37:38.260 --> 0:37:41.320
<v Speaker 2>times as possible. And I like this because it's so,

0:37:41.380 --> 0:37:44.469
<v Speaker 2>so super simple. So when the emotional hijacking takes over

0:37:44.830 --> 0:37:47.620
<v Speaker 2>and you're like, oh, I'm so angry right now, think now.

0:37:48.110 --> 0:37:50.469
<v Speaker 2>of what Tim is saying to you right now and

0:37:50.510 --> 0:37:51.690
<v Speaker 2>just say how.

0:37:52.010 --> 0:37:53.820
<v Speaker 4>Tim, I've loved this chat.

0:37:53.980 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 3>It's been so practical.

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:58.100
<v Speaker 4>I feel like I know I'm walking, although I've read

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:00.819
<v Speaker 4>the book, so I knew more to begin with, but

0:38:01.300 --> 0:38:03.980
<v Speaker 4>I feel like listeners will just be walking away with

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:08.210
<v Speaker 4>so many practical ways that they can feel more comfortable

0:38:08.630 --> 0:38:11.310
<v Speaker 4>going into that next conflict.

0:38:11.550 --> 0:38:12.290
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thank you very much.

0:38:13.010 --> 0:38:16.290
<v Speaker 1>So if you have a hard conversation coming up, I

0:38:16.390 --> 0:38:18.590
<v Speaker 1>hope that my chat with Tim is made you feel

0:38:19.110 --> 0:38:22.850
<v Speaker 1>more calm and maybe more prepared. And if you want

0:38:22.870 --> 0:38:26.310
<v Speaker 1>to learn more, I highly recommend checking out Tim's new book,

0:38:26.450 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Clear Intention, How to Get Better at Conflict. And if

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 1>this episode resonated, a really good companion listen is my

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:40.219
<v Speaker 1>chat with Exeglassian's work futurist, Dom Price. We get into

0:38:40.260 --> 0:38:42.970
<v Speaker 1>the two things that you might be doing that make

0:38:43.070 --> 0:38:46.989
<v Speaker 1>difficult conversations harder, how Dom prepares for the tough ones,

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:50.620
<v Speaker 1>and how to approach a conversation when you don't feel safe.

0:38:51.060 --> 0:38:53.020
<v Speaker 3>There is a link to that in the show notes.

0:38:54.020 --> 0:38:56.740
<v Speaker 1>If you liked today's show, make sure you hit follow

0:38:56.940 --> 0:39:00.280
<v Speaker 1>on your podcast app to be alerted when new episodes drop.

0:39:00.890 --> 0:39:02.550
<v Speaker 3>How I Work was recorded.

0:39:02.270 --> 0:39:04.870
<v Speaker 1>On the traditional land of the Wurundjeri people, part of

0:39:04.890 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 1>the Kulin Nation. Today's episode is brought to you by

0:39:14.460 --> 0:39:20.009
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Business. Unlock smart business buying. Learn more at amazon.com.au

0:39:20.190 --> 0:39:21.629
<v Speaker 1>forward slash how I work.