WEBVTT - The Difference Between Mean, Nasty & Rude 😡

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Flex and Frooms. Flex and Frooms. This is the Flex

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and Frooms catch Up podcast.

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:10.959
<v Speaker 2>You are back with Flexi and through me and Flexi,

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 2>I have a question for you.

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Are you ready question? Please keep your ears open.

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that's a difference between mean, nasty and rude?

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Mmmm mmmmm.

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Rude?

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 3>I think is incidental and in the eye of the recipient.

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, like some people perceive passive behavior to be rude,

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 3>nervous behavior to be rude. Generationally, some things are considered

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 3>rude when really they're just not a social norm anymore.

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Get it.

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Wearing a hat indoors is considered rude. You know, using

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 3>a phone during a meeting is considered rude. Sometimes we dabble,

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 3>so I think, yeah, that's just like it's incidental.

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>We all fall victim to it.

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 3>We don't always mean it, but it happens me, I

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 3>would think, is usually an action that is like starting

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 3>with you, Sorry, I.

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Was playing on my phone to be rude. You didn't

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 2>even notice. Oh sorry, another one that didn't land.

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Pardon me, It's okay, walk it off, okay, Mean, I

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 3>would say, is often what happens as a result of

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 3>you feeling bad. I'm having a bad day. Therefore I

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 3>might act mean. Usually I don't think it's about you.

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 3>It's more about how I'm feeling. And then as a result,

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 3>you're impacted by what I'm going through. And then nasty

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 3>is pointed like I'm trying to hurt your feelings today.

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>What do you reckon?

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 2>You've done a pretty good summation, Thank you, I would say, sir.

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I agree that rude is cross generational. It's also stars

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 2>of communication. Oh yeah, Like I've got some friends that

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 2>are very direct with me.

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Are the friends that are.

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Totally indirect and then get mad and are passive and like,

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 2>now that I've known them for many years, I know

0:01:59.520 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 2>neither of.

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Them being rude.

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 2>It's just their way of speaking to me. Ye mean,

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 2>mean is mean spirited. I think people that are mean

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 2>someone's been mean to them. Like, I think it's a transference.

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 1>Hurt people, hurt.

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 2>People precisely, And I think nasty is of a similar strain.

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's turbocharged. Ooh nasty.

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 3>It's like calikush, what's that? Oh, I've had enough?

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>What's that? Nasty is like.

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 3>It's tricky because I don't think I would use the

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 3>phrase nasty, but you know, a nasty person.

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Nasty, that's like, that's like a next level. It's like

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you you do that rancid whoa, whoa, whoa whoa?

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 2>What would I rather be? I would rather be rude,

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 2>of course, I don't want to be mean. I think

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 2>in order from worst to best, nasty is the worst

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 2>you can be. Mean is bad, but also your actions

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 2>can just be considered mean when you're just looking out

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 2>for yourself, and rude is definitely the most plausible deniability

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:11.359
<v Speaker 2>accountability moment.

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah she was so rude, she's so mean, she was

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>so nasty. Yeah, I take rude. Yeah, it will take rude.

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 3>I mean, granted, you've got to be all of them

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 3>at any given point. No one's worse than the other.

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 3>Like you have some nasty people who are really quite polite.

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>In doing so.

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>So I was watching this TikTok of.

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 3>It was like this skit of your mum who's just

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 3>noticed that your friends bleached their eyebrows, and they start

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 3>saying all this backward, just like insincere stuff, and you're

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of like, that's quite nasty.

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not really rude. It's like not really hitting that.

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>It's like babes.

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 3>You don't need to be doing all of that. The

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 3>tone is polite, but it's not good. So like, let's say,

0:03:55.440 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 3>for an example, you showed me we're looking at a

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 3>piece of art. We're at an art gallery, some local artists.

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 3>We're looking at it. We clearly don't like it. Someone

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 3>says to us, what do you think? And we're like, ah,

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 3>not for us, but you know, it's nice rude to rude, okay,

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 3>just practicing, okay, just practicing, developing our craft.

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>We've come to a good summation. We would like to

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>be rude.

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 2>If you've ever been rude to you, this is a

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 2>get out of free pass and it's been a pleasure.

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 3>I would love to know if people to be preferred

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 3>to be seen as passive, aggressive or aggressive, like progressive

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 3>in like in an ideal world, if people could only

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 3>see you as two things, passive, aggressive or aggressive, which

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 3>would you prefer?

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:45.559
<v Speaker 1>Regressive or aggressive? Said aggressive twice. Sounds like you're saying regressive. Sorry,

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm mumbling. I'd rather be I know. I don't want

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 1>to discuss it. We're talking about it next thing. Year.

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to the Flex and Frooms Daily podcast

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>for more tune indicater on DAB or stream it on iHeartRadio.