WEBVTT - ChatGPT and Murdoch team up: what could possibly go wrong?

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Already and this is this is the daily This is

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the daily ohs oh, now it makes sense.

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Good morning and welcome to the Daily OS. It's Monday,

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 2>the twenty seventh of May.

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Zara, I'm Sam.

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Each week we hear more and more about how AI

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 2>is changing the world, whether that be for better or

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 2>for worse.

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Artificial intelligence has become so advanced it has now surpassed

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 3>human performance on several basic tasks.

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Some of the news you read is being written by AI,

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and you wouldn't know it.

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Now, one of the biggest news companies in the world,

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 2>News Corp, has signed a new deal with one of

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 2>the biggest AI companies in the world, Open Ai, and

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 2>the idea is to better train its AI bots with

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 2>news corps and news reports. Now, while we don't know

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 2>the details of the deal, it's understood to be worth

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of millions of dollars. In today's podcast, we're going

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 2>to talk talk about that new deal, how the broader

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 2>industry is dealing with the growth of AI, and what

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 2>comes next. Before that, ZAM, what's making headlines.

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>Over six hundred and seventy people are believed to have

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>died in a landslide in Papua New Guinea. According to

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>estimates released by the UN's International Organization for Migration, the

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>landslide occurred in the remote village of Calcalam on Friday.

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>As a major rescue operation continues, Prime Minister Anthony Albernesi

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:33.559
<v Speaker 1>said Australia stands ready to assist. US. President Joe Biden

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>also committed to delivering humanitarian assistance and disaster relief to

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the region.

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Optus is being taken to court over a twenty twenty

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 2>two data breach which saw around ten thousand customers personal

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 2>details published online. The Australian Communications and Media Authority AKMA

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 2>are taking Optis to court on the grounds that the

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 2>telecommunications company failed to protect the confidentiality of its customer

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 2>personal information. The media watchdog said the matter is now

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 2>before the court.

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Over the weekend, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to quote immediately halt its military offensive in Rufa in

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>southern Gaza. More than eight hundred thousand Palestinians have been

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>forced to flee parts of Raffa in recent weeks as

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Israel conducts military strikes in the area. The ICJS said

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the humanitarian situation in Rafa should now be categorized as

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.959
<v Speaker 1>quote disastrous. In response to the ruling, Israel's Ministry of

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Foreign Affairs said it quote has not and will not

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>conduct military operations in the Raffa area, which may inflict

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>on the Palestinian civilian population in Gaza conditions of life

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that could bring about its physical destruction.

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 2>And today's good news, the European Space Agency has given

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 2>the world a first glimpse of the dark universe with

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 2>new images showing distant clusters and galaxies. The Euclid telescope

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 2>captured what it called a treasure trial of unprecedented discoveries.

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 2>It's part of a mission that will work towards mapping

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 2>billions of galaxies and researching the formation of the universe.

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 2>And now we're going to take a quick break and

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 2>then the deep dive. NewsCorp and OpenAI, which is the

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 2>tech company that created chat GPT, have signed a multi

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 2>year content deal. NewsCorp, of course, is a multinational media

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 2>and publishing company founded by none.

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 3>Other than Rupert Murdock. We are familiar, We are familiar.

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 2>It owns several international several feels like an understatement, many

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 2>many plethora international and domestic titles, including The Wall Street Journal,

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 2>the Australian News, dot com dot Au. If we keep going,

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 2>we will be here all day, but many many titles

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 2>now under a new partnership, News Corpse content will be

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 2>used to respond to chat GPT's user questions. News Corps

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 2>CEO Robert Thompson said the deal will set new standards

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 2>for voracity, for virtue and for value in the digital age.

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>So this was really big news last week, not just

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>in media circles but in general news. Before we go

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>any further into the deal, can we just go back

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and explain exactly what open ai is. It's chatjbt, right

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it is.

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 2>So. It was launched by Sam Altman, who we have

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 2>dedicated many a podcast too, and Tesla owner Elon Musk,

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 2>who we have similarly dedicated many a podcast too. It

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 2>was launched in twenty fifteen and the company's state admission

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.799
<v Speaker 2>was to benefit humanity as a whole. As you said,

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 2>open Ai is most known for launching the conversational chatbot

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.919
<v Speaker 2>chat GPT, and that can generate things like essays and

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 2>poems and travel itineries if you're mean and going on

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 2>your honeymoon.

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>It was crazy you told me last week that you

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>asked chat GPT the best route for your honeymoon, and it.

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Gave me I'm lazy and I don't have time, and

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 2>my chatbut gives me everything.

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>And my chatj BT hack of the week has been

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>if you upload a screenshot of a game into chat GPT,

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>it will give you the code to build that game.

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're talking here about terrifying. We're talking here

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>about really powerful software. I mean amongst our friends, most

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>people are using it for things like writing speeches.

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, holidays, every wedding speech we have been to.

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 2>The dad has got enough and made a joke about

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 2>how chat GPT has written the wedding speech.

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>As without fail. As with any new technology, it's working

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>its way into our lives in weird ways. But one

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>thing it hasn't been able to do is give us

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>reliable news content, right Yeah.

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 2>And I think that US journalists have been incredibly cocky

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 2>about this. You know, everyone else is fearing for their

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 2>jobs and the age of AI, and yet journos haven't

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 2>quite felt that in the same way. Because you know,

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 2>when you go on to the current free version of

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 2>chat GPT, and I went in and typed in, tell

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 2>me the latest about Julian or Sanche for example, big

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 2>news story. It came back with, I'm sorry for any confusion,

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 2>but I can't provide real time updates or information on

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 2>events occurring beyond my last training data in January twenty

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty two. And so that is going to this idea

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 2>that AI to inevitably need to be fed the information

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 2>from somewhere and on a recurring basis, and they need

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 2>to be made smarter, and that that needs to be

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 2>a reflection of the kind of ever evolving nature of information.

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 2>If the last time this bot was taught about Julian

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Assiunge was in twenty twenty two, it's got a lot

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 2>of learning to do. And so that's why this deal

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 2>with news Corp is such a big deal, because basically

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 2>NewsCorp has agreed to let open Ai use its content

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 2>to support chat GPT's responses and its learning and to

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 2>enhance the knowledge of its database and systems.

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>So basically, in your Julian Dessinge example, it could scrape

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 1>News Corps newspapers from all over the world and give

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you an answer in real time.

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly.

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 2>And so NewsCorp, on their behalf have said that it's

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:49.239
<v Speaker 2>sharing its resources to ensure the highest journalism standards exist

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 2>across open AI's products, which is interesting. On open ai side,

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 2>the CEO Sam Moltman said the deal was a proud

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 2>moment and he said it was setting the foundation for

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 2>a future where AI deep respects.

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's an interesting word.

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 2>We're personifying AI here enhances and upholds the standards of

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 2>world class journalism.

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so right now News Corp is saying open ai

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you can have access to a significant volume of information

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in real time. What are they getting in return?

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Money?

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Got it?

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 2>We don't know the specifics of the agreement because that's

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 2>not been made public by either News Corp or open Ai,

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 2>but NewsCorp would be getting a lot of money out

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 2>of this, and we had some NewsCorp publications reporting on

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 2>the deal that said could have been worth more than

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and fifty million US dollars, so around three

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 2>hundred and eighty million Australian dollars over the next five years.

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>So ultimately a whole new revenue stream.

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and we know that in Australia Meta has ended

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 2>its funding for news organizations, including News Corp, and that

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:52.679
<v Speaker 2>that would have left a gaping hole where those millions

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 2>had been coming in from Meta and so it's interesting

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 2>that NewsCorp has now kind of pivoted and is now

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 2>getting that money from another tech giant, which is open Ai.

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 3>The new kid on the scene.

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Is NewsCorp the only news company to assign a deal?

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 3>They're not?

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean I can confirm that the Daily Ohs hasn't

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 2>been approached for a multimillion Maybe touse Spam maybe check

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 2>it after this, but no.

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 3>There have been other deals met.

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 2>So we know that Politico, which is a political publication

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 2>and an international one, the Associated Press and French newspaper

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Lamond have also got agreements with open Ai.

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>So there's clearly now a bit of a playbook for

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>media companies that's emerging of go to the AI companies

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and do a deal. But are there other ways?

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 2>But those are only with open Ai. That's one AI company,

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 2>just to be clear.

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>So are there other ways that news companies and AI

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>are beginning to work each other out?

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a good question.

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 2>I think that this is the big conversation as media

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 2>companies strategized, you know, we put our heads together at

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 2>our newsroom and figure out what we can do with AI.

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 2>This is happening in every single company around the world.

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Like you can just imagine the millions being caught into

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 2>getting management consultants in to come up with, you know,

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 2>the next AI strategy for help company.

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Or in information technology.

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 2>It's everywhere exactly and so obviously the News Corp deal

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.719
<v Speaker 2>is one way to work with AI companies and it's

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 2>a fairly big step because, as I said, they're giving

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 2>access to their content straight to these AI companies to

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 2>make their machine learning smarter. But there are other companies

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 2>taking smaller steps. Sam Here at TDA, we have been

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 2>looking into, you know, for example, whether AI tools can

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 2>make some video editing a bit quicker. We film every

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 2>single podcast that we do. You can go watch this

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube if you're that way inclined, and you know,

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.719
<v Speaker 2>we have two cameras and are there AI tools that

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 2>can switch between those cameras automatically and that takes out

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 2>a bit of the manual labor that goes into editing

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, this ten minute podcast for YouTube. I mean,

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 2>that's a very small step, but it's something that AI

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 2>can do. When I look to the rest of the industry,

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 2>I was looking around at how other media companies in

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Australia are dealing with it, and I saw Channel nine

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 2>has recently started using a product called nine Express, and

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 2>that's to reformat their TV scripts.

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Into digital stories.

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Interesting.

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 2>So Channel nine houses, of course a number of different

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 2>companies underneath it, and we have the print journalism, there

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 2>is a TV journalism, and then there is a digital journalism.

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 2>And so in a discoimer on their website, nine says

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 2>nine Express makes things easier and quicker for our producers

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 2>and journalists across television and digital. They've then made really

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 2>clear in how it works section how they're actually using

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 2>the AI. So they say, and I quote here, a

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 2>television script contains a number of technical terms in jargon

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 2>so it can be used for a news report. We

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 2>take this originally created script which has been written by

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 2>a television reporter and producer, and then fact checked and

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 2>input it into nine Express. It is then reformatted to

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 2>be used as a digital tech story. It is checked

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 2>again by a producer before being published. It ends by

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 2>saying that nine remains committed to using new technologies in

0:10:58.080 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 2>a transparent and responsible way.

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>And in that very detailed setting out of exactly how

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>this process is working for nine, I think you can

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>start to identify some of the risks that are involved

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>with AI, and for the majority of this podcast, we've

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about the opportunities that AI can present in newsrooms.

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:18.079
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is, as that nine disclaimer mentioned, there

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>are major ethical and moral issues that arise.

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 2>And you have to be responsible exactly, and we've seen

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 2>some of those issues arise in other settings. So if

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 2>we look internationally, at the end of last year, the

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 2>New York Times launched legal action against open ai and

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 2>against Microsoft, which has invested billions into open ai, for

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 2>using the New York Times as news content without permission,

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.719
<v Speaker 2>so basically doing the news corp thing, but without any

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 2>of the money or the recognition in doing so. The

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 2>New York Times claimed AI generated content threatens the times

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 2>as ability to provide journalism. They claimed that open ai

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 2>is taking materials from The New York Times to train

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 2>the AI, but they're not crediting or attributing that work

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 2>to The New York Times. According to The Times, the

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 2>AI chatbots seek to free ride on the Times as

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 2>massive investment in its journalism by using it to build

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 2>substitutive products without permission or payment.

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Now, the doubta in me would say the news Corp.

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Have gone to the table and done a deal with

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Open AI, and The New York Times have done things

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 1>a slightly different way and broad lawsuit that could inevitably

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>end in a deal. Yes, this is kind of true,

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>sure roads to the same destination. But I think the

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>bottom line here is that AI is going to be

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>built into every industry on the planet, and news is

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>no different. And this News Corp deal is a real

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>big signal to the market from the biggest media company

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>in the world that this new technology is here to

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>stay exactly. Thanks for joining us on the Daily Ods

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Hope you had a wonder full weekend and

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you're off to a good start to your Monday. We'll

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 1>be here every day this week, so we'll see you

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>again tomorrow morning. Until then, have a good day. My

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>name is Lily Madden and I'm a proud Arunda Bungelung

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Calcuttin woman from Gadigal Country. The Daily oz acknowledges that

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>this podcast is recorded ordered on the lands of the

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Gadigal people and pays respect to all Aboriginal and Torrestrate

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>island and nations. We pay our respects to the first

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:10.079
<v Speaker 1>peoples of these countries both past and present.