WEBVTT - Body Composition Goals For Our 20’s, 30’s and beyond. Processed Vs. Ultra-Processed Foods. Reviewing Noway Collagen Mousse. Choosing the Healthiest Dumplings.

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you weigh yourself regularly or maybe only when you're

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to lose weight, or maybe your preference to measure

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>is to actually track your progress using photos or some

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:11.719
<v Speaker 1>other form of body composition. On today's episode of The

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Nutrition Couch, we dive deep into the specifics of body

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>composition and what we should be aiming for as we

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>move through our twenties, thirties, forties and beyond. Hi, I'm

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Leanne Ward and I'm Cussie Burrow, and together.

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 2>We bring you The Nutrition Couch, the weekly.

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Podcast that keeps you up to date on everything that

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you need to know in the world of nutrition as

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>well as body composition. Today we talk about the controversial

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>issue of ultra process foods and share what exactly the

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>difference is between a process and an ultra process food.

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.840
<v Speaker 1>We've also found a new dessert in the supermarket potentially

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>linked to some healthy skin benefits, and our listener question

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>is all about one of our favorites, dumplings. But to

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>kick us up today, Susie I wanted to have a

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>quick chat about ultra process foods because we received a

0:00:56.400 --> 0:01:00.319
<v Speaker 1>quite negative comment on our podcast reviews, where somebody just

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.279
<v Speaker 1>two stars on the podcast Susie for cooling the Red

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Drop Daily Chips, which we were discussing a couple of

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>podcasts back, which literally just have potato, salt and oil,

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and you and I had a bit of a convos

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>slash little debate about whether they were a process or

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>an ultra processed food, and I think we landed on

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they are about a process food based

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>on the ingredients were far better than some of the

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>other chips in the supermarket aisle, and somebody basically was

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>not happy with that and left us two stars for that,

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>which I just think is a little bit petty because

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>we've given how many years and years of free episodes away,

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's a whole other issue. On very upset about that.

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>We take our ratings very seriously, don't we, hear, Susie.

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>We give away so much free time and value.

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 2>To our listeners. We're a bit upset about that.

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>But also I thought it was important to go through

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the definition of exactly what an ultra process food is

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>because it's a large difference between what is considered a

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>process food, and we do know that we eat many

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>process foods every day, and processed foods are still very healthy.

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Essentially anything that's in a packet with a label on

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it has some level of processing to it. Might be yogurt,

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it might be milk, it might be rolled oats, it

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>might be there's another example like a beautiful dense whole

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>grain bread like our burg and soiling that we know

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that we love. So there are all examples of processed

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>foods because they were very tin fish tuna yep tin

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>yep tin tuna a great example. So they're all very

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>different to how they're found in their very natural form,

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>right versus. The difference between a process and an ultra

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>process food is that level of processing takes that next step,

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and typically the level of ingredients in there are not

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess good or healthy for your your health long term.

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So I found a little bit of a definition in

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of ultra processed foods. So what they're basically designed

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 1>for is manufacturers create these ultra processed foods to create

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>highly profitable you know, foods to basically bring in additional

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>money into their businesses because they want to make these

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>foods taste good. Think about things like you know pringles

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, like the slogans what is it something about you?

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Once you podcast stop?

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Something like that so basically who they want you to

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>eat more and more and more of it. So they

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>typically will put a lot of fat, a lot of sugar,

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of salt, a lot.

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Of these extra additives into.

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>These foods, whereas if you were making some potato chips

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>yourself at home, they're not things that you would typically

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>add at home. So ultra processed foods tend to be

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>highly palatable, tend to be very convenient, you know, packaged,

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 1>and they tend to have quite a long ingredient list

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>as well, compared to just what we would call a

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>processed foods, which we know can still be very healthy,

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of what we would call whole foods

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>or you know, relatively whole foods, things like yoga tin

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>tuna can still be termed process but in a good

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>way where we still would want to actively include those

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>things regularly in adult So I just wanted to let

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>our listeners know a really practical way of, I guess,

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>identifying the difference between an ultra process food and a

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>process food. So my big tip for our listeners, Susie,

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>is to really check the list of ingredients you're not

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>going to really know based on the nutrition information panel,

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>whether a food is processed versus ultra process you have

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to identify the ingredient list. Don't worry what it says

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>on the front package marketing. It doesn't matter if it's

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>gluten free, it doesn't matter, if it's organic, it doesn't

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>matter if it's low sugar.

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Flip it, over.

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Look at the ingredient list and actually go by the

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>ingredients one by one. And a big characteristic of an

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>ultra process food which there's a I guess.

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 2>A definition called NOVA and OVA which.

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>Sort of defines an ultra processed food to say that

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.239
<v Speaker 1>it's a food substance or ingredients which you would either

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>never or very rarely use in your kitchen. So if

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the ingredient list of this product that you've picked up

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>has an ingredient in there that you've never found in

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>your kitchen or pantry or very very rarely have ever

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>used in a recipe, if that is found on the

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>ingredient label, it is very likely the definition of an

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>ultra processed food. So some ingredients Susie would be high

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>fouct dose corn syrup, hydrogenated types of vegetable oils, hydrogenlyzed

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>types of proteins. You wouldn't actually put that kind of

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff into your food at home. So a lot of

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>these like high protein based I guess products such as

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>protein chips and protein bars and protein you know, musli bars.

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Bread, the pizza bases that we've spoken.

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>About exactly ultra process types food. Can these be by definition,

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>I guess healthy and food into your macros be lower calorie,

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>be higher fiber. Absolutely, but food companies are specifically manufacturing

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>them that way in order to you know.

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Appear healthier.

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's a bit of a trade of between the

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>calories and macros look great. But also what is this

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>ingredient list that we don't realize or know of some

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of these ingredients on that list, So there also tends

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a lot of additives in there and additional things.

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>It might be emulsifies, it might be flavor enhancers. It

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>might be thickeners. It might be sweeteners. It might be

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>bulking agents, foaming jelling, extra multifying salt, extra colors, extra flavors,

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>glazing agents. All of these additives again are not something

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that you would add to say a banana bread if

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you're baking it at home, if you're baking some cookies

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>with your toddler, you wouldn't be adding things in such

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>as flavor andhandsers and emosifies and sweetness and thickeners and

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>foaming agents and gels. So the addition of those things

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>as well tend to make it more of an ultra

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>process food. Now, when not saying that you can't ever

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>have an ultra processed food, you absolutely can. But it

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.559
<v Speaker 1>is about the amount and how regularly you have those things,

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and the less of those things in our diet, the

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>better it is going.

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 2>To be overall for our health.

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of these food companies will use a

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of these extra additives, the emulsifies, the bulking agents,

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the glazing gels, the thickeners, the sweetness for the palatability

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of that food, but also sometimes to extend the shelf

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>life and just make sure that food can you know,

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>last on the shelf for two, four, six, twelve months time,

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>because if it was a fresh something like an apple,

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>for example, it's only going to last, you know, a

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks and that it will be rotten if that.

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>So it is used to extend the sh life for

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the products, but also a lot of it

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>is used also to extend the palatability of the product

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and make it so that you want more and more

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and more. So you know, food companies are very smart.

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>They want you to buy more because when you buy,

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the more profit that they make. So that for me,

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>sus is really the definition of an ultra processed food

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>versus the processed food.

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 2>And again, if we go back to.

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>That definition of our Red Rock Deli sea salt, only

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>only the sea salt one where it's got potato, it's

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>got oil, and it's got salt. That to me, I'm

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>going to stand my ground and I still believe that

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is a process food.

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Does that mean that it is healthy? Not necessarily.

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean that it's something that we should be

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>regularly consuming in our diet. No, I'm not going to

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>recommend people consume potato chips every day, even though it's

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a healthier variety of some of the other types of

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>potato chips on the market. So there's a lot of

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>nuances that go into what makes up a food, what

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>makes it healthy? Is it something that we recommend every

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>single day? So this was purely just a discussion on

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the differences between process and old to process foods. But

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't actually mean that our processed food is, you know,

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>should be consumed more often because we know that there

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>are more whole food based types of processed foods and

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>more sometimes or soul foody types of ultra process foods

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that we probably don't want too much of in our diet. Particularly,

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.679
<v Speaker 1>weight control is an issue because something like a potato

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>chip is quite high calorie and not that filling compared

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to something like a tub of Greek yogurt, which is

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>quite filling and is quite high in protein. You might

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>get some added calcium benefits as well. So when we're

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:32.439
<v Speaker 1>looking at whether a food is healthy and when we

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>want to have it regularly, we also want to look

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>at what are the nutrients it's providing our body and

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the overall energy density of that food as well in

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of how often we really should be consuming it.

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts on ultra processed foods? Do you

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>believe that our two star rating was a it's valid

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>on that once.

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 4>I just want to say to our listeners that Leanne

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:54.959
<v Speaker 4>takes our ratings very seriously, very she really is very

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 4>upset about this. I, on the other hand, after years

0:08:57.760 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 4>of being in the media, choose not to look at

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 4>my comments ratings, because I think if you don't like it,

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 4>bad luck, don't listen. But what I will say about

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 4>ulture process, you're a lot younger than me, so the

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 4>novelty are aware of and you'll get to the point

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 4>where you.

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Don't look at it anymore.

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 4>But going back to that, for me, it's the length

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 4>of the ingredient list alone. If I look at an

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 4>ingredient list and it's a mile long, and we've certainly

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 4>covered it, most recently in some of the higher protein

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 4>pizzas and wraps, you know, you look and it's like

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 4>twenty thirty ingredients, and certainly ingredients you don't recognize. This

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 4>is a conversation I have on a daily basis with

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 4>my clients because they all love to eat snack bars.

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 4>Now I do use some snack bars. There's some protein

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 4>bars I might use, particularly to keep as a backup

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 4>in your handbag or your workcase. And certainly there's some

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 4>brands that like a nutbar, brands that can be better,

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 4>but for me, they're still pretty processed. And in the

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 4>case of many of the protein bars, they're absolutely ultra

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 4>processed foods.

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 3>They don't look like food.

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 4>The ingredients are heavily manipulated to make it into a

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 4>palatable substance, because protein in nice doesn't taste amazing, So

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 4>to get a higher protein snack bar, you have to

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 4>heavily formulate. Now I'm not saying they don't have a role,

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 4>and it's certainly better than picking up a fast food meal.

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 4>But my argument is to the clients, don't des grab

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 4>the bar because you like it it's sweet, It's still

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 4>much more process It's not going to be as filling

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 4>as if you make yourself some yogurt with granola and berries,

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 4>or some beautiful grain crackers with cheese and tomato. That's

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 4>real food. It's completing it. It's got a fresh component.

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 4>It's going to be much more satisfying. It's going to

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:32.719
<v Speaker 4>take time to eat. You know, if you eat a

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 4>protein bar, they can have one fifty one eighty two

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 4>hundred calories and they're gone in three bytes and you

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 4>don't even notice. And all my clients love to eat

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 4>the bars, it's their preference, and they forget all the

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 4>fresh food that goes with it. So for me, those

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 4>foods are the backups. They're things you might have on

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 4>special occasions. In many cases as dieticians. Let's be honestly,

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 4>and we don't think of them as food. They're heavily

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 4>formulated products. So yeah, without spending hours in the supermarket,

0:10:57.760 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 4>if you scan an ingredient list and you have to

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 4>recognize half the stuff, it's probably not that healthy, which

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 4>is an argument that comes up often with pre made

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 4>marinades and sauces, because yeah, if I'm thinking about sources

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 4>i'd use at home, it's extraversion olive oil, bit of

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 4>sour cream, bitter yogurt, bit of evaforated meal. Like, I

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 4>don't have a lot of pre made marinads and sauces

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 4>because when you look at them, they're so heavily formulated,

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 4>in processed. They're absolutely ultra processed to make things taste good.

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 4>And my argument is you better to stick to more

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 4>natural flavors without incorporating those into your diet. So I

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 4>think this is an ongoing conversation that nutrition professionals are

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 4>up in arms in arguing that labeling foods ultra process

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 4>versus process is taking away from the key message. For me,

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 4>it's semantics. It's very easy to see if for foods

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 4>overly processed, and I think it's safe to say the

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 4>less of those foods you have in your diet, the better,

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 4>all right, Well, moving on land, there was something that

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 4>crossed my path last week talking to some of my clients.

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 4>And I was talking to one of my ladies in

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 4>her late forties, and she's here because her goal is

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 4>to lose some body fat. You know, she wants to

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 4>lose sort of eight ten fifteen kilos, and she's kind

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 4>of coming out of that period with her kids. She's

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 4>got more time to focus on herself. And you know,

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 4>we were just talking about weight in general, and I

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 4>said to her, look, the scales are important, absolutely, we

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 4>do want to make sure you're in fat loss and

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 4>losing size. But even for me at the age bracket

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 4>you're in, it's actually much more important to me that

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 4>your waist is coming down because that's a direct measure

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 4>of fat loss. And her waist is in its mid nineties,

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 4>which is suggestive she's got at least ten kilos of

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 4>body fat to lose. And I definitely want my ladies

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 4>waste in their low eighties, if not slightly below. If

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 4>I can get a waste to seventy five seventy am,

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm very happy because that's certainly a marker of disease risk,

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 4>but I thought it warranted a conversation about that. Leanne

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 4>and you had a good example about one of your

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 4>clients as well, because when I'm working with my women

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 4>in their forties and fifties, I want them to build

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 4>a body that is strong and functional into their senior years,

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:59.319
<v Speaker 4>because it's not better to be thin, even though aesthetically

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 4>we might feel into certain clothes. Certainly, observing people I

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 4>know who are overly thin, I also know that they've

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 4>got very little muscle mass because they've either lost a

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 4>lot of weight even using drugs like oz and peak,

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 4>and lost a lot of muscle mass, and I can

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 4>see that their frame is small and they're almost getting

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 4>a hunched overlook. So I can see as they get

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 4>older that lack of muscle mass is not going to

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 4>protect their skeleton. They're going to be more prone to

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 4>falls and fractures, and it's a frail type physique. Whereas

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 4>I see my women and even myself as sure we

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 4>could all be five kilos lighter, but is it not

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 4>better to be strong and functional and maintain that level

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 4>of muscle mass with a lean wist, because that is

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 4>going to lean your body in good shape. To keep

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 4>very active, to lift and play with your grandchildren, to

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 4>be off to hype for long periods of time, and

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.680
<v Speaker 4>as long as that WISTE measurement is low. In many cases,

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 4>I don't really care what the weight is as long

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 4>as you are functionally fit and feeling good in your body.

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 4>So that might be eighty kilos, but if you've got

0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:59.719
<v Speaker 4>a waste of eighty two, I'm actually not worried about it.

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 4>So I just think it's good to talk about the

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 4>importance of body composition. And the example we wanted to

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 4>give was when you do lose weight, and in particular

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 4>for our listeners who perhaps are planning tour of lost

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 4>large amounts of weight, it is impossible to just lose

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 4>body fat without losing muscle mass. They go together. The

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 4>body doesn't say, oh, well, I'm only going to lose

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 4>body fat. It's a cycle and you will lose both.

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 4>So certainly, when we're starting out with our clients, we

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 4>are prepared to accept somebody fat and muscle mass loss.

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 4>And the question came up because my client had noticed

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 4>a drop on the body composition scales in her muscle mass,

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 4>and I said, as long as it's relatively small compared

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 4>to the fat mass. I'm happy, but ultimately we do

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 4>need to pull the muscle mass down. So say, if

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 4>you're losing ten kilos, probably one or two of that

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 4>will be muscle mass. And then over time, once I've

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 4>got your weight down to where you want to be

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 4>or your waist, let's do a body composition scan and

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 4>see where your body fat is sitting, but also your

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 4>muscle mass, and in some cases that will then direct

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 4>the style of training you do. Because if you've never

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 4>trained in your life, if you didn't from athletic background,

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 4>if you didn't do a lot of sports as kids,

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 4>if you've never lifted weights, your muscle mass is probably

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 4>relatively low for your age and your size, and as

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 4>you get older, we probably do want to build some

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 4>of that tissue through your torso, through your legs, through

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 4>your buttocks, so that you're creating a strong frame that

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 4>is fit and agile as you get older, so to

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 4>me as part of that journey. Sure, and this is

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 4>particularly relevant for anyone using a weight loss medication like

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 4>ozen Peak, where you will lose large amounts of weight,

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 4>it's okay to bring it down slightly get to where

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 4>you want to be focused on a waste measurement as

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 4>a measure of body fat loss, and then over time

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 4>will scan you and rebuild your body composition so you're

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 4>strong and fit and agile to move through those senior years.

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 4>So it's like a project to set you up for

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 4>a strong and fit and healthy middle late period through

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 4>your life.

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and I'm super super passionate about that as well,

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>particularly with my ladies, because we do know that the

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>research shows that once you hit the age of forty,

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>your muscles drops off by about two to three percent

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>every year.

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 2>So it is.

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Literally that age old saying, what is it that if

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't use it, you'll lose it? Basically, So if

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you're not utilizing and building your muscle mass, it will

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>slowly decrease over time.

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 2>And that is just you in a normal state.

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>If you put yourself into a calorie deficit to drop

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>some body weight, as Susie said, naturally a small amount

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of that will be hopefully a lot of that will

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>be fat loss, and naturally some of that will be

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of muscle mass as well. There are

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>some things that you can do, and certainly this is

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>where I work a lot with my clients to say,

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, we want to minimize as much muscle loss

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>as possible and really try to hold onto that muscle

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>mass and really try to just drop body fat. And

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you can do that by making sure the calorie deficit

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>is only slight. You know, if you're going to drop

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>ten kilo super quickly, you do some awful crash diet

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and you get ten kilos off in eight weeks or something,

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the large majority of that may potentially be muscle mass.

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>But if you do it in the right way, where

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you've dropped ten kilos slowly and sustainably over six to

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>twelve months, you're very likely going to hold onto that

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>precious muscle mass. So there's slower you lose it. The

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 1>better it is from a muscle and a metabolic perspective. Also,

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 1>the higher your protein intake is, the more likely you

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>are to hold onto that muscle mass. Also, if your

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>protein intake is more evenly distributed throughout the day, the

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>more likely you are to hold onto that muscle mass.

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 2>And that comes into reason.

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>If you're eating three and a half grams of protein

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>per kilo of body weight, it's just far too much,

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>so more is not better. But you absolutely need to

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>have enough protein and as much as possible evenly spread

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that throughout the day. And the third thing we want

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to do to try and retain as much muscle mass

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:33.479
<v Speaker 1>as possible is do some form of weight or resistance training.

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>The guidelines say at a minimum of twice a week. Ideally,

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I like my ladies if we can aiming for three

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to four sessions a week. And this is where I

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>take a lot of my ladies who might come to

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>me with the goal of, say ten kilos of weight loss,

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're in those you know, peri or metopause or years,

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and I might say, all right, we've got to drop

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:52.199
<v Speaker 1>ten kilos of body fat, but we want to maintain

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 1>as much muscle mass as possible.

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Typically, those ladies in that.

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Sort of fifty forty five fifty year age group are

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 1>walking or doing some form of like coladoes or hot yoga.

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's where I will flip that and say, okay, cool,

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind you doing that, but let's do that

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>on two to three days of the week, and I

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>want you to start with. It might be a PT,

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it might be some home based workouts. It might be

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>going to train with their you know, teenage son who

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>who knows a lot about weightlifting, all that sort of thing,

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and just training in their home gym. So we'll get

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>them started on some form of resistance or weight based

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>training program to start with two days a week, and

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>then what we find is that they actually start to

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>enjoy it. They love how functionally fit they're becoming. They

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 1>can carry all the shopping in with you know, from

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the car with you know, in one trip, instead of

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>having to do two or three trips. They can play

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>with the grand kids, they can toss them up in

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the air. They love that feeling and feeling fit and strong,

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and they naturally will build off two days a week

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and increase to three and increase to four. So over

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>time they're choosing to get stronger as their body gets,

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, functionally more fit. So they're a couple of

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:49.679
<v Speaker 1>things that we can do to really ensure that we

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:53.959
<v Speaker 1>minimize as much muscle loss as possible. Is keeping our

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>protein intake higher and evenly distribute it throughout the day,

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>not putting ourselves in too large of a calorie deficit.

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 1>Anything over about twenty percent, you're very likely going to

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>be eating into that muscle mass a little bit more.

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>And also making sure that the slower you lose it

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of the better it is. And doing some form

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of resistance training at a minimum of two but ideally

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of three to four days a week if you can.

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>If you can't fit that in no worries. You just

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 1>do what you can. But you've got to do something.

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Gone to the days where it's like, oh, you'll be fine,

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>just pick up some weight training in your seventies, Absolutely not.

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 1>By then you're probably already osteoporotic. You've probably got some

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>form of sycopenia or muscle wasting already going on, and

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it's probably a little bit too late. And the final

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>thing I'll say here, su is is the gold standard

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to body composition is a dexa scan.

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.439
<v Speaker 1>So if you have never had a dexic scan in

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>your life and you are over the age of women

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I say maybe fifty, I would highly recommend that you

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>do that A to check your bone mineral density risk

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>and your risk of something like osteoporosis, and B it

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>can also show you your fat mass and muscle mass

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.400
<v Speaker 1>distribution as well. You want to make sure that if

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you are using it from a body composition perspective, you're

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>going in getting that scan first thing in the morning,

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>before you really eat or drink anything. If you're just

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.199
<v Speaker 1>doing it from a bone mineral density perspective, you can

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>go at any time of the day, but like most

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>body composition forms of measurement, you really want a measurement

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>that can be repeated more accurately over time. So if

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>you get that first thing in the morning, before you exercise,

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>before you eaten, before you drink, it's more repeatable and.

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Accurate to measure over time.

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>You might get a dexa once a year, and if

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it at the same time each day, it's

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>far more accurate to repeat that measurement over time. So

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to go into a dexiclinic and get

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a scan at three pm after you've exercise, after you've

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of meals that day, because it might

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:37.239
<v Speaker 1>not be as accurate if you're going to repeat that

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>later on. So they are highly influenced by your exercise

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 1>for the day, what you've eaten, and what you've drunk.

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 1>So if the goal is to use it for your

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>bone mineral density analysis, plus also a body composition analysis

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to check your muscle and fat mass, you do want

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>to get that first thing in the morning. And that's

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the reason why a good dexiciclinic will actually open it

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>probably like six am, to actually allow people to get

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 1>those scans quite early on before they actually commence the day.

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 2>So that's the last thing I'll say.

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>And if you've got a little bit of private health industry,

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.719
<v Speaker 1>you may be able to claim that dexis scan, particularly

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're getting a dietitian to interpret the results for

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you as well.

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 3>And just one last comment.

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 4>Whenever you see a diet like lose ten kilos in

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 4>ten weeks, I would estimate that at least half of

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 4>that is muscle mass loss. And the reason that Leanne

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 4>and I can tell that is that we know how

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 4>long it takes to metabolize fat. So for someone who

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 4>has a lot of weight to lose, they on average

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 4>can lose about a kilo a week of body fat,

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 4>maybe a little bit more if they exercise a lot,

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:35.159
<v Speaker 4>but let's be honest, people who have a lot of

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 4>weight to lose don't tend to be massive exercises, so

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 4>it's usually about a kilo a week, whereas my Lena ladies.

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 4>Initially they might lose a bit more, but it's usually fluid,

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 4>and I know they're losing about half a kilo a

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 4>week body fat, or about a centimeter around their waste measurement.

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 4>So I guarantee you if people are losing ten kilos

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 4>in ten weeks, which I don't think is feasible anyway.

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 4>For most most of it is a mix of fluid

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 4>and muscle, with maybe three four kilos of fat max.

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 4>So don't be misled by those fad diets. And they're

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 4>always pushed by people who aren't dietitians because they can

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 4>say whatever they like and get those results. You'll never

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 4>hear a dietitian say you can lose ten kilos in

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 4>ten weeks, because you literally can't. You're losing muscle mass

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 4>and stuffing at me metabolism over time.

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean you can, but scale weight is not

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>body fat, So that ten kilos might be, as Susie said,

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 1>four or five kilos of fat mass, but four or

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>five kilos of muscle mass. And the chances are you're

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 1>going to put it back on anyway, because it was

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 1>unsustainable to begin with, and when you put it back on,

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you're actually at a worse place than when you started

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>because metabolically, you've down and regulated because you've been in

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>such a huge calorie deficit. You haven't been doing the

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>proper weight training, and you haven't been eating enough protein

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to get that ten kilos off, So metabolically you're far

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>worse off, which means that not only do you put

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the ten kilos back on often, you put back on

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 1>even more. You might put back on eleven or twelve

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>over time, so you actually end up heavier than where

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you initially started, which is why we never ever recommend

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>crash darting or fad diets or anything super restrictive to

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>get the weight off initially. If you can't maintain what

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you're doing to lose the weight longer term, just on

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:06.640
<v Speaker 1>more calories, it's probably not the right diet for you,

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>which is why we always advocate not only just working

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>with the registered health professionals such as a dietitian or

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a registered nutritionist, We actually recommend that you work with

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody who understands fat loss, because not all dietitians are

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>trained and sustainable fat loss. Not all dietitians understand how

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>body composition works. You know, dietitians are trained fundamentally in

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>medical nutrition therapy, but that doesn't actually cover fat loss.

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of an extra area of upskilling. So if

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:34.919
<v Speaker 1>the goal is body fat loss or a little bit

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of body composition, I would actually seek out a dietitian

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>who's properly trained in that area, not just a normal

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 1>dietitian or a normal nutritionist or a normal health coach,

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>because chances are they don't actually know what they're doing

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>and you could end up doing more damage metabolically to

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:49.880
<v Speaker 1>yourself long term.

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 3>True.

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, well on to our next segmency.

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>We found some collagen moves in the supermarket, So talking

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 1>about process and ultra processed foods, this will be an

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting one because I had a client send this to

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>me and she was like.

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 2>What do you think?

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>And I saw it in wool West and I just

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of said to her, look, it looks good on paper.

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how it tastes. It's not relatively cheap.

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, but also I'm sort of like,

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>is that a whole food ingredient? Probably not, Like, I

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know how they're going to get some sort of protein.

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Moose is quite interesting, So I thought, let's reveal on

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the potty and give it a go, so it is

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the no way, so no way, it's pretty clever.

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 2>No way.

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Collagen moose in chocolate flavor, twenty four gram sachet, so

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it looks like a single serve sashet retails for three

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>ninety five at wool West. And it was in the

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, like the health foody type section, the protein

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>section where you get all the protein bars. It was

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in that section. So the packet says no artificial colors

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>or flavors, rich chocolate flavor, seventeen grams of protein, three

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.360
<v Speaker 1>grams of carbs in dairy and gluten free, and that's

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 1>all I can see.

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Seits you.

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll get you to run through the ingredient list because

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't have that in front of me. It's sort

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:52.120
<v Speaker 1>available online.

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I found this is an interesting product. I hadn't

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 4>seen it before. But there's huge interest in collagen as

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 4>a skin booster, particularly to get a little bit older.

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 4>And so it doesn't list ingredients in a similar way

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 4>as the statin products would in terms of amounts and references.

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 4>But it's got hydrolyzed bobine collagen peptides, so it's certainly

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 4>not a vegetarian product. Bobine gelatin, natural flavors, cocoa powder

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 4>at six percent, which is quite a high percentage, sodium

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 4>alginate which is probably some sort of binder, a kasia

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 4>which I think is a binder, gum, and stevia, so

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 4>it's actually reasonably clean ingredient wise, and certainly when I

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 4>take a look at the nutritional panels, so a sachet

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 4>gives you less than one hundred calories just eighty three

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 4>a massively and seventeen crams of broteine. Very low fat,

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 4>it's like less than one grams of fat perserve and

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 4>low fat product less than two grams of carbohydrate perserve,

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 4>so insignificant, no sugars because they're using stevia to sweeten

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of dietary fiber, which is random like

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 4>where's that gum? Is tiny and then very little sodium

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 4>in it. So you know, for me, and if you

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 4>liked this product and needed more protein in your diet,

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't have an issue with my clients having it,

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 4>because I haven't tried it and I don't myself like

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.640
<v Speaker 4>mussy type things. But if you liked it and wanted

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 4>to have it as you're after dinner dessert, that's high

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 4>in protein for less than one hundred calories. I give

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:19.399
<v Speaker 4>it a thumbs up. I don't know what do you think.

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind it, but I will say that if

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you need more protein in your diet from a muscle

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>building perspective, do not use collagen. This is a huge

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>misconception in the industry that all protein is the same.

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Collagen protein lacks the essential amino a said lucine, So

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 1>lucine really stimulates or turns on that muscle protein synthesis.

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 1>So if your goal is body recomposition, you want to

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 1>drop body fat, gain a little bit of muscle mass,

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>do not use collagen as your protein source.

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Sousia.

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you the amount of clients who come

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to me and they're like, hey, I need some help.

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm doing pretty good, Like I'm taking collagen

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>powder with my smoothie, so I'm getting enough protein at breakfast,

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and after their gym session, I'm like, ah, we need

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to change the collagen protein powder into a WPI to

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>really help you build some lean muscle mass because it

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have enough lucine. You need to ensure that your

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>protein powder, if it's a WPI or away based protein,

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 1>it would automatically have that this is just more important

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>for a vegan based protein or something like collagen, where

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it needs to have at least two to three grams

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of lucine per serving to actually initiate that switch, which

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we know that fires up that muscle protein growth essentially.

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>So I don't like it from the fact that if

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you're using it as like a post workout gym kind

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:30.919
<v Speaker 1>of treat, but I don't mind it if you're just

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>using it from a collagen perspective. So I think leave

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>collagen as collagen. We know that there is some research

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>around helping with skin elasticity, We know it helps with

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>hydration in the skin. We do know that there's some

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.360
<v Speaker 1>good research for collagen, but that's sort of where it stops.

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.199
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing really that it supports anything to do with

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>gut health or intestinal barrier. And we also do know

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>that collagen shouldn't be used for muscle building. So to me,

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I kind of separate those two things, like leave collagen

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>as collagen and leave protein as more WPI or a

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>good blend of a vegan proten powdered with at least

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>two to three grams of loosine in it. So that's

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 1>my little side tangent to this, But I don't mind

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 1>it overall as just I guess like a bit of

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a what is it like a sweet kind of dessert,

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 1>like it's a moose, So yeah, I think it gives

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you a good hint of collagen.

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Does it list how much collagen?

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Because again, we know from the research that we'd ideally

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:20.439
<v Speaker 1>want at least three to five grams of collagen per

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.880
<v Speaker 1>serving if you're using that for the benefits of skin house.

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.360
<v Speaker 4>It has to be heaped, though, doesn't it because there's

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:28.919
<v Speaker 4>nothing else in it like you would think, so, well,

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 4>there's only collagen peptides and bovine gelatin. That's not going

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 4>to have protein direct with seventeen grams, you'd have to assume.

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>But it makes me worry that they don't list how

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>much collagen is in it.

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 3>But if collagen peptides are the first ingredient.

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>We've established, it in't by law that they need to

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 1>need to put it in their labeling someone.

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 4>But well, it's not in a strange product, but gelatin doesn't.

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 4>It could be wrong here, but I don't think gelatin's

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 4>coming in with protein, is it. But if the first

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 4>ingredients are collagen peptides, it would have to have a

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 4>reasonable amount of seventeen grams, so you would think so, yeah.

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, that's one for our listeners to investigate themselves. If

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you are taking collagen, the research is three to five grams,

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. I'm just pulling that number off the top

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of my head. I'm pretty sure.

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 4>But also, what I think with people who like something

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 4>sweet after dinner, I think freezing these kind of products

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 4>and using it like an ice cream can work quite well.

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, so it's not a huge, huge, huge thumbs up,

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>but I don't see anything really wrong with it. It

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>is probably what I would define would you define that as.

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 2>A process food? Yeah?

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 3>Process?

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, maybe halfway between a process and ultra process food.

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>It's really discussion for another day. But yeah, I don't

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>see anything too wrong with it. I think for four

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>bucks a pop, it's not like you're going to be

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>having it every single night.

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 2>That would really hit you wallet if you were.

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think, you know, occasionally is a bit of

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a sweet after dinner option. I don't really see too

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>much wrong with it. I think it's fine.

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, okay, all right, Well onto more exciting topics. We

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 4>am because we're going to talk dumplings, which is a

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 4>subject very close to your in my heart.

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 2>To love some dumplings.

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 4>I was a late adopter of the dumplings. I didn't

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 4>eat dumplings probably until about two or three years ago,

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 4>which is just like, don't even ask me why. But

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 4>I've now become a massive convert. And this is a

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 4>listener question that came in from our Instagram to ask

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 4>about are they actually healthy? Because of course you might

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 4>go to a restaurant and they're deep fried and you think, god,

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 4>it can that actually be healthy? So we're going to

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 4>talk about supermarket dumplings today because I think there's quite

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 4>a lot to talk about now. The first thing I

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 4>am looking for in a dumpling is has it got

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 4>added flavor enhances? Because to me, as soon as they've

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 4>got added MSG, I'm not a fan. I don't think

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 4>that's good to be adding that in. You're already it's

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 4>already a product you consume with soy sauce. So I'm

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 4>pleased to say that most of the mainstream bands and

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 4>supermarkets no longer contain added MSG. And we have spoken

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 4>about the Audi dumplings, which are extremely cost effective, and

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:44.719
<v Speaker 4>they too have a very clean list in terms of

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 4>no added MSG.

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 3>I've just done a bit of.

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 4>A wreki in the main supermarket brands, and it's generally

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 4>only the cheaper brands that sort of retail for that

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 4>it's a cheaper price point per packet at four or

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 4>five dollars. Those brands do tend to still contain it,

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 4>whereas the main ones, which is Diana Chair and Mister Chens,

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 4>those brands don't have it in which is great. Now,

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 4>the indicator of dumpling quality is the percentage of protein

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 4>or pork in it. Now, obviously that's different if you're

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 4>having vegetarian dumplings, but if you're having traditional whether it's

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 4>pork or chicken, whichever, And basically the higher the percentage

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 4>of meat in there, the better and the shorter the

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 4>ingredient list is leanne and I've discussed today when it

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 4>comes to the processing of food. So the highest amounts

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 4>of protein you'll find ranges from about twenty five up

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 4>to even thirty nine percent in one of them. Now,

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:35.520
<v Speaker 4>they're tricky with their labels because what they do. They

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 4>say the filling is sixty percent, and then you've got

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 4>to work backwards how much percentage of the pork or

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 4>chicken it is. Some at the bottom will say overall amount,

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:47.479
<v Speaker 4>but I'm looking for at least twenty five and as

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 4>I said that one of the diner chains got to

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 4>thirty nine percent chicken, which is huge. So the other

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 4>thing I want to say about dumplings is that whether

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 4>you prefer chicken or pork, can you find one that's

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 4>twenty five thirty thirty five percent pro tem which are

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 4>certainly available. I would say that you have to remember

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 4>that dumplings in isolation are not a meal. So if

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 4>you just have twelve fifteen dumplings, it's too much. A

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 4>serve of dumplings I would say is about six maybe eight,

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 4>And then you have to complete the meal with the

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 4>vegetable component. So for example, if you use cauliflower rice

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 4>as the base, that you can do as a fried rice,

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 4>or you might do it with greens, your bockchoy or

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 4>your Asian greens. You've got to complete the meal. And

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 4>when you complete the meal, you only will get through

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 4>six or eight or so dumplings, because what happens is

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 4>if you just put all of that product with the

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 4>soy in your bowl, you'll eat one hundred of them

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 4>because they've got a really moorish taste because of the

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 4>yamami flavor coming from the soy sauce. So that's probably

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 4>my main message. The main supermarket brands are pretty good.

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 4>Short of the ingredient lists, the better look for the

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 4>ones with at least twenty five up to thirty thirty

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 4>five percent protein pork, whichever your filling is. And then

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 4>you've got to complete it as a meal. A dumpling

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 4>meal is not twenty dumplings. It's six eight, maybe ten

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 4>you're a big guy. But yeah, you've got to bulk

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 4>the meal out and put the rest of it in

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 4>the plate, otherwise you'll just keep eating them.

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and also the way you cook it, obviously, because

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of you know, restaurants and young

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 1>trap places offer like steamed options but also the deep

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>fried options. But even the steamed options are not completely steamed.

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Often what they do is they fry the bottom of

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>them off to make them nice and crispy on one side,

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and then they put water in the pan and then

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>they steam them after that, so there is still you know,

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a bit of extra oil if you are getting them

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>from like dimsem places as well. How I like to

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>do it at home, Sousie is use you know my pants,

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>spray a little bit of oil in there, fry the

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>bottom off, but not nothing too crazy. I'm not adding

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a quarter of a cup of olive oil or anything

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>into my pan. And then I'll pour about half a

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>cup of water in there, put the lid on, and

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>steam them until the water runs dry, essentially, take the

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>lid off, and then just move them around the pan

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to chrismen them for the last couple of minutes. And

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I find that that makes them like really nice in crispy.

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And then in my separate pan, I'm making my veggies essentially,

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and I like to serve my dodumplings with broccolini, zucchini, mushrooms.

0:33:57.480 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 2>I'll put a little bit of ginger and.

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Garlic in my as well, and then sometimes I'll throw

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in a little bit of Asian greens, like some buck tooy,

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>some punck tooy as well, because I do like to

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>serve at least sort of a third or half a

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>plate of vegetables with my dumplings, and like you, I

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>would tend to do. I probably do between six to

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>ten depending on the size. You know, sometimes you can

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>get quite long ones, whether they're dumplings, whether they're goosas,

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 1>whether they're you know, sometimes those little soup dumplings are

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 1>quite small. Sometimes other goyosas are quite big as well.

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 1>So it really does depend on the size of it.

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>But overall, ideally you'd like to get in about twenty

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>grams of protein overall, but to get in twenty proteins,

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>if that means that you're eating twenty dumplings, you probably

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:38.240
<v Speaker 1>want to find that protein in another source.

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 4>Put it that way, true, true, true, true, But yeah,

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 4>we're big fans. But it's just getting the balance right

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:44.359
<v Speaker 4>in the portion control is key.

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh Sousy brings us to the end of another episode

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:50.359
<v Speaker 1>of the Nutrition Couch. Again, we thank you for you

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>listening and for your support. We couldn't do this without you, guys,

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and we're so proud to have our little family of

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 1>nutrition catch listeners every week. So if you know that

0:34:57.800 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>your diet needs a little bit more protein and you

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>weren't where, we have designed a particular formulated high protein

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>range of supplements at designed by Dietitians dot Com. We

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 1>have our Nourish Women's Hormone Blend and we have our

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 1>Nourish pre and Probotic Guthouse blend as well, so you'll

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>find both of them at designed bydietitians dot com. Thank

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 1>you for listening and we will catch you guys on

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:18.240
<v Speaker 1>next week's episode.

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Have a great week.