1 00:00:00,360 --> 00:00:02,640 Speaker 1: As you would have heard throughout the week, there's been 2 00:00:02,680 --> 00:00:06,360 Speaker 1: a lot of coverage about the Defense Strategic Review which 3 00:00:06,400 --> 00:00:08,960 Speaker 1: the federal government released earlier in the week, and I 4 00:00:08,960 --> 00:00:11,520 Speaker 1: think the big question out of the Northern Territory has 5 00:00:11,600 --> 00:00:15,240 Speaker 1: been what is it going to mean for the Northern Territory. 6 00:00:15,240 --> 00:00:19,000 Speaker 1: We know that the top end and indeed Darwin incredibly 7 00:00:19,040 --> 00:00:22,960 Speaker 1: strategically important. Now joining me on the line is doctor 8 00:00:23,040 --> 00:00:26,639 Speaker 1: John Coyne, the head of the Northern Australia Strategic Policy 9 00:00:26,720 --> 00:00:27,120 Speaker 1: sent Doug. 10 00:00:27,160 --> 00:00:30,000 Speaker 2: Good morning to you, John, morning Katie. 11 00:00:30,240 --> 00:00:34,120 Speaker 1: Firstly, how important was it that this review happened? 12 00:00:35,760 --> 00:00:38,480 Speaker 2: Look at it was really really important. I guess many 13 00:00:38,520 --> 00:00:40,680 Speaker 2: of many listeners will sort of sit there and go 14 00:00:41,159 --> 00:00:43,360 Speaker 2: as I do occasionally go. You know, no government has 15 00:00:43,360 --> 00:00:45,479 Speaker 2: ever released a report that they haven't said, is, you know, 16 00:00:45,560 --> 00:00:48,000 Speaker 2: the most important in a generation or a decade or 17 00:00:48,000 --> 00:00:52,440 Speaker 2: something else like so true on this occasion. You know, 18 00:00:52,520 --> 00:00:57,760 Speaker 2: we face on uncertain times, We face a strategic environment 19 00:00:57,840 --> 00:01:00,800 Speaker 2: that is really uncertain, something we haven't seen a long 20 00:01:00,880 --> 00:01:04,800 Speaker 2: long time, and you know, my best assessment is it's 21 00:01:04,840 --> 00:01:09,000 Speaker 2: going to probably last decades. So this is really, I 22 00:01:09,000 --> 00:01:13,560 Speaker 2: guess a refocus for defense for someone who, as you know, 23 00:01:13,600 --> 00:01:16,120 Speaker 2: and we've talked about before. I'm passionate about Northern Australia 24 00:01:16,120 --> 00:01:18,959 Speaker 2: and I believe that, you know, it's economic and social 25 00:01:19,000 --> 00:01:22,319 Speaker 2: prosperity is important to Australia's national security. So when I 26 00:01:22,400 --> 00:01:27,920 Speaker 2: read the Defense Strategic Review, I'm really happy with each focus. 27 00:01:27,959 --> 00:01:31,160 Speaker 2: It's certainly provided a great deal more focus on the 28 00:01:31,200 --> 00:01:34,720 Speaker 2: importance of Northern Australia, more so than a Defense Strategic 29 00:01:34,800 --> 00:01:39,200 Speaker 2: Update in twenty twenty, and certainly has more clarity than 30 00:01:39,560 --> 00:01:43,400 Speaker 2: probably since nineteen mid nineteen eighties when Paul gid wrote 31 00:01:43,800 --> 00:01:46,480 Speaker 2: his white paper. So I guess the message here is 32 00:01:46,480 --> 00:01:48,680 Speaker 2: is that it makes a clear statement that we need 33 00:01:49,320 --> 00:01:53,080 Speaker 2: not just the fixed bases and target hardening in Northern Australia, 34 00:01:53,200 --> 00:01:56,600 Speaker 2: but troops and capabilities need to be there. But also 35 00:01:56,720 --> 00:02:01,640 Speaker 2: it makes reference to infrastructure like transport, like roads as well. 36 00:02:02,080 --> 00:02:04,720 Speaker 1: Now, John tell us, you know, obviously, like you've just 37 00:02:04,760 --> 00:02:07,040 Speaker 1: touched on, we all know that Northern Australia is so 38 00:02:07,240 --> 00:02:10,160 Speaker 1: strategically important. I mean, even if you just look at 39 00:02:10,160 --> 00:02:13,800 Speaker 1: where we are geographically. But there's been some discussion about 40 00:02:13,800 --> 00:02:16,120 Speaker 1: whether it's going to mean more troops for us or 41 00:02:16,160 --> 00:02:18,880 Speaker 1: what it's going to mean for US in terms of, 42 00:02:19,120 --> 00:02:21,560 Speaker 1: you know, the level of defense personnel that we've got 43 00:02:21,639 --> 00:02:23,560 Speaker 1: here in the Northern territory. Are we going to see 44 00:02:23,600 --> 00:02:24,720 Speaker 1: an increase? Do you reckon? 45 00:02:26,120 --> 00:02:28,880 Speaker 2: Look, I think you know the short answer that is is, 46 00:02:28,919 --> 00:02:31,280 Speaker 2: I think there will be at least some increase in 47 00:02:31,360 --> 00:02:35,280 Speaker 2: troops in Northern Australia in general, and certainly that's a 48 00:02:35,320 --> 00:02:38,920 Speaker 2: reversal of what we've seen over the last decade. But 49 00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:41,480 Speaker 2: I think the real investment, in the real story is 50 00:02:41,480 --> 00:02:46,519 Speaker 2: one about investment in in bases and in linking those 51 00:02:46,560 --> 00:02:50,520 Speaker 2: bases together and creating a network of fully operational bases 52 00:02:50,520 --> 00:02:55,640 Speaker 2: across Northern Australia. That means certainly for the average territory 53 00:02:55,680 --> 00:02:57,919 Speaker 2: who's looking for evidence of what it mays, that means 54 00:02:57,919 --> 00:03:01,840 Speaker 2: an economics spend on instruction in Northern Australia. 55 00:03:02,639 --> 00:03:05,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, now tell me as well. I know that there's 56 00:03:05,600 --> 00:03:07,720 Speaker 1: been some discussion and you're much more of an expert 57 00:03:07,720 --> 00:03:09,560 Speaker 1: in this space than what I am, but they've been 58 00:03:10,160 --> 00:03:14,280 Speaker 1: a discussion and certainly been you know, mentions of us 59 00:03:14,320 --> 00:03:17,680 Speaker 1: having sort of Australia more generally having sort of more 60 00:03:17,720 --> 00:03:21,720 Speaker 1: capacity when it comes to missiles rather than you know, 61 00:03:21,840 --> 00:03:25,160 Speaker 1: rather than if there was you know, I guess a 62 00:03:25,200 --> 00:03:28,359 Speaker 1: war on you know, on Australian soil. So having that 63 00:03:28,440 --> 00:03:32,040 Speaker 1: capacity with missiles, et cetera. Do you think that that 64 00:03:32,080 --> 00:03:34,720 Speaker 1: could mean that we here in the Northern Territory might 65 00:03:34,760 --> 00:03:38,520 Speaker 1: indeed be a base for that kind of you know, 66 00:03:38,600 --> 00:03:39,840 Speaker 1: for that kind of weaponry. 67 00:03:41,600 --> 00:03:43,520 Speaker 2: I do think it means that, but it's a that's 68 00:03:43,560 --> 00:03:45,800 Speaker 2: a sort of a complex question. So I want to 69 00:03:46,080 --> 00:03:48,440 Speaker 2: there's a couple of sort of dimensions to it. The 70 00:03:48,440 --> 00:03:51,080 Speaker 2: first one is is, you know, what we've learned from 71 00:03:51,120 --> 00:03:54,600 Speaker 2: the war in Ukraine is that logistics are important, So 72 00:03:54,680 --> 00:03:57,680 Speaker 2: the capacity to have enough in case of a conflict, 73 00:03:57,760 --> 00:04:05,280 Speaker 2: having enough ammunition, food, water, fuel. Okay, So a lot 74 00:04:05,280 --> 00:04:08,560 Speaker 2: of this investment is about manufacturing missiles in Australia. Now 75 00:04:08,600 --> 00:04:10,320 Speaker 2: I've been an absit here, you know, I would love 76 00:04:10,360 --> 00:04:13,520 Speaker 2: to see that sort of manufacturing done in Northern Australia. 77 00:04:14,120 --> 00:04:16,840 Speaker 2: It creates jobs, it's a great location to do it, 78 00:04:17,279 --> 00:04:19,240 Speaker 2: and it's a great place to live for those people 79 00:04:19,320 --> 00:04:22,720 Speaker 2: working in the industry. I think, however, you know, if 80 00:04:22,720 --> 00:04:25,159 Speaker 2: I'm being very honest to those listening, I don't think 81 00:04:25,200 --> 00:04:27,880 Speaker 2: that that we're going to see missiles being manufactured in 82 00:04:27,920 --> 00:04:31,160 Speaker 2: Northern Australia. My second point though, is that a lot 83 00:04:31,200 --> 00:04:33,280 Speaker 2: of this we talk about it in terms of conflict. 84 00:04:33,360 --> 00:04:36,719 Speaker 2: Everyone's sort of saying, you know, this VSR is about conflict, 85 00:04:37,120 --> 00:04:39,920 Speaker 2: and there can be no doubt it's about increasing our readiness. 86 00:04:40,440 --> 00:04:42,360 Speaker 2: But what people have got to understand is, you know, 87 00:04:42,440 --> 00:04:45,800 Speaker 2: whether it's missiles or whether it's the Defense Strategic Review, 88 00:04:46,480 --> 00:04:49,800 Speaker 2: it's part of a broad sky hole of government effort 89 00:04:49,839 --> 00:04:53,559 Speaker 2: and an effort between Australia and our allies to deter 90 00:04:53,880 --> 00:04:57,560 Speaker 2: future conflict. So it's not just about missiles, it's also 91 00:04:57,600 --> 00:05:01,279 Speaker 2: about deterring conflict. Is also about the ployment and other issues, 92 00:05:01,720 --> 00:05:04,559 Speaker 2: but certainly to really go to the heart of your question, 93 00:05:04,680 --> 00:05:07,520 Speaker 2: so if you want to have a meaningful strike capability 94 00:05:08,320 --> 00:05:10,720 Speaker 2: and you want to base that so that to protect 95 00:05:10,800 --> 00:05:15,000 Speaker 2: our maritime approaches, then of course those sorts of capabilities 96 00:05:15,040 --> 00:05:18,000 Speaker 2: need to be based in Northern Australia. The other part 97 00:05:18,080 --> 00:05:21,760 Speaker 2: and component that most people misses. Northern Australia has some 98 00:05:21,839 --> 00:05:27,000 Speaker 2: of the best firing ranges and training ranges in the world, 99 00:05:27,360 --> 00:05:31,440 Speaker 2: and indeed Delamere Range is the best instrumented range in 100 00:05:31,440 --> 00:05:34,120 Speaker 2: the world as far as I know. And so as 101 00:05:34,120 --> 00:05:36,560 Speaker 2: a result of that, if there's someone somewhere where you 102 00:05:36,600 --> 00:05:38,560 Speaker 2: want to train, where you're able to use all of 103 00:05:38,600 --> 00:05:44,400 Speaker 2: the fifth generation warfare capabilities at once, including missiles, then 104 00:05:44,440 --> 00:05:45,919 Speaker 2: Northern Australia is that place. 105 00:05:46,440 --> 00:05:49,520 Speaker 1: Now, John, we know that China has responded to the 106 00:05:49,600 --> 00:05:54,719 Speaker 1: landmark Defense review. Was their reaction in line with expectations? 107 00:05:55,880 --> 00:05:58,400 Speaker 2: Oh? Look absolutely, But you know, let's put this in 108 00:05:59,080 --> 00:06:03,720 Speaker 2: really clear text. Okay, So the People's Liberation Army has 109 00:06:03,760 --> 00:06:08,760 Speaker 2: been undergoing one of the greatest modernization efforts in history. 110 00:06:09,720 --> 00:06:13,840 Speaker 2: So they are buying new weapons capabilities, they're getting more missiles, 111 00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:18,760 Speaker 2: they're getting more warships, et cetera. They've also gone about 112 00:06:19,320 --> 00:06:22,960 Speaker 2: after promising not to around militarizing islands in the South 113 00:06:23,040 --> 00:06:27,080 Speaker 2: China Sea, after promising not to put missiles and combat 114 00:06:27,080 --> 00:06:30,440 Speaker 2: aircraft on them, they're doing doing exactly that. There's a 115 00:06:30,480 --> 00:06:32,960 Speaker 2: great deal of irony in the response from the Chinese 116 00:06:33,040 --> 00:06:35,880 Speaker 2: government about you know this Australia using this as an 117 00:06:35,920 --> 00:06:40,119 Speaker 2: excuse to bolster its defense force. I mean, the pure 118 00:06:40,120 --> 00:06:44,680 Speaker 2: facts here are that the Chinese Communist Party is indeed 119 00:06:44,800 --> 00:06:46,440 Speaker 2: growing its military capability. 120 00:06:47,360 --> 00:06:49,919 Speaker 1: Now, John, this might be a little left field. We 121 00:06:50,040 --> 00:06:52,880 Speaker 1: know that the ship lift obviously here in the Northern Territory. 122 00:06:52,920 --> 00:06:55,279 Speaker 1: The government has put aside a substantial amount of money 123 00:06:55,320 --> 00:06:58,120 Speaker 1: to build this shiplift facility. With the review, or as 124 00:06:58,160 --> 00:06:59,919 Speaker 1: I understand it, there's also going to be a food 125 00:07:00,160 --> 00:07:04,679 Speaker 1: review I think into the type of vessels that's still 126 00:07:04,720 --> 00:07:07,200 Speaker 1: set to happen. Is there any risk that the ship 127 00:07:07,240 --> 00:07:10,440 Speaker 1: lift for the Northern Territory could be made redundant? 128 00:07:11,800 --> 00:07:15,640 Speaker 2: Look, I don't think so. I certainly, well, I'm not 129 00:07:16,080 --> 00:07:20,880 Speaker 2: deeply involved in the calculation and of specific widgets and 130 00:07:20,920 --> 00:07:26,760 Speaker 2: lifting capability. It's certainly the specifications of the planned ship 131 00:07:26,880 --> 00:07:30,160 Speaker 2: lift are large enough that they can be used on 132 00:07:30,240 --> 00:07:33,880 Speaker 2: a range of vessels ranging from and you know, the 133 00:07:33,960 --> 00:07:38,720 Speaker 2: ship lift itself isn't all about isn't all about lifting 134 00:07:38,760 --> 00:07:42,160 Speaker 2: the military boats out of the water. It's also about 135 00:07:42,560 --> 00:07:45,160 Speaker 2: you know, the Perlings lead that operates in Northern Australia. 136 00:07:45,240 --> 00:07:48,440 Speaker 2: It's around range of other ships. So look, I think 137 00:07:48,480 --> 00:07:51,280 Speaker 2: that the ship lift itself doesn't run a risk of 138 00:07:51,360 --> 00:07:54,120 Speaker 2: being obsolete. I think it's a much needed piece of 139 00:07:54,160 --> 00:07:58,240 Speaker 2: infrastructure and one en whichment the program itself needs to 140 00:07:58,240 --> 00:08:01,520 Speaker 2: be accelerated and one of the key one of the 141 00:08:01,600 --> 00:08:04,559 Speaker 2: key factors in the Defense Strategic Review that the peat 142 00:08:04,600 --> 00:08:07,560 Speaker 2: there is that you're not only is the North important, 143 00:08:07,640 --> 00:08:09,920 Speaker 2: but you know, we actually need to move fast to 144 00:08:10,040 --> 00:08:14,679 Speaker 2: do these improvements in bases and ports and in terms 145 00:08:14,720 --> 00:08:16,640 Speaker 2: of infrastructure, we need to do it quickly. 146 00:08:17,200 --> 00:08:20,320 Speaker 1: Well, doctor John Coyn, It's always great to catch up 147 00:08:20,320 --> 00:08:22,520 Speaker 1: with you, and we always appreciate the fact that you 148 00:08:22,600 --> 00:08:24,920 Speaker 1: make these kinds of things quite easy for us all 149 00:08:25,000 --> 00:08:27,640 Speaker 1: to understand, because I think that, you know, sometimes in 150 00:08:27,680 --> 00:08:30,400 Speaker 1: these discussions just sort of wonder just how much has 151 00:08:30,440 --> 00:08:32,920 Speaker 1: been politicized and what it all means to a place 152 00:08:33,000 --> 00:08:36,120 Speaker 1: like the Northern Territory. So we always appreciate you, you know, 153 00:08:36,200 --> 00:08:38,520 Speaker 1: making it nice and easy for us all to understand. 154 00:08:39,880 --> 00:08:40,480 Speaker 2: Thanks Caurtie. 155 00:08:40,480 --> 00:08:43,080 Speaker 1: Always a pleasure, great to catch up with you. Thanks John,