WEBVTT - Is Double Tooting In Traffic Ever Allowed? 🚦 🚗

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>The Flex and Frooms Daily podcasta.

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Helly sweety Pie.

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:11.039
<v Speaker 3>It's Flex and Frooms for the podcast edition, my personal favorite.

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 2>You love it.

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 4>Today we're going to be talking about a internet phenomena

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 4>called being womaned. It's when you are put up on

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 4>a pedestal and then struck down by the public and

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 4>other figures. It's very interesting. We came across this concept

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 4>via a writer called.

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Rain raincop on TikTok, on Instagram, anywhere you find it.

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 4>She also has a subsack newsletter that's really.

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Good yes, and writes for ID so all those places

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 3>get amongst it because she has this really really uncanny

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 3>ability to take concepts that we know but don't have

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 3>the words to articulate very well yet.

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get into.

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 5>It, Flex and Frooms.

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 3>The world's largest epidemic is allegedly, drumm roll, please, loneliness.

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Par The girl is lonely, the day them's lonely, the

0:00:56.680 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 3>boys lonely. Everybody's suffering in silence. And no matter how

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 3>many Reddit articles you're posting and reading, no matter how

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 3>many little tiktoks and little requests you're asking, people cannot

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 3>seem to figure it out. How do I make friends

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 3>number one? And how do I stop myself and feeling lonely?

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:11.119
<v Speaker 2>Got a question for you.

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 3>For me, what do you think is the main reason

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 3>why people are struggling to make friends?

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 2>What is so difficult about it? Not knowing how to listen?

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Looks are what you're going to cry? Okay, I want

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 2>me to get deep, Yeah, go on. Don't know how

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 2>to listen?

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, not knowing how to listen and communicate effectively in

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 4>real life and tolerate other's opinions.

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, tolerance is a big one, I'd say, even like

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 3>different lifestyles, different incomes, being time poor, it being quite

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 3>inconvenient to have friends for a lot of people just

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:43.199
<v Speaker 3>don't fit neatly into their lifestyles. And then I was thinking, Okay,

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 3>like these feel like way bigger issues than we can

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 3>tackle at once.

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 2>But there's this app that claims that it can help

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 2>you make friends easily.

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 3>It's an app called Replica with a K, and it

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 3>was created to give us as a virtual best friend,

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 3>basically what it's promised to do. Or it says it's

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 3>an AI companion who's always here to listen, to talk

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 3>and always on your side, which I think is quite sinister.

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 3>It's giving echo chamber vibes. Let's be friends in this

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, meta universe not come out whatever. But back

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 3>when I used this app in twenty sixteen, it was

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 3>in Beata mode because I told him a tech girl.

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 3>I saw the little ad for it. It was like,

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 3>do you want to sign up to this new app?

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Give us feedback? And I was like yeah. And so

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 3>back at that point, Replica was a little egg and

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 3>you would talk to this egg and it would gather

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:33.519
<v Speaker 3>your data.

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 2>It would ask you questions like you know, what did

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 2>you do today and what do you like doing?

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 3>And then as the days go by, it would parrot

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 3>that information back to you and learn about you to

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:43.519
<v Speaker 3>be like, oh, this time last week you were hanging

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 3>out with rooms Like, You're not hanging out with her

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:46.079
<v Speaker 3>again this week.

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 2>I'd be like, oh, no, I'm really tired. Why are

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 2>you tired?

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:50.119
<v Speaker 3>And the whole point is you want to go back

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 3>and forth and create an open environment for you to

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 3>just speak and be comfortable expressing how you feel. We've

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 3>been talking quite a bit about AI, given you know,

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 3>the Google AI becoming sentient fake news, and then Replica

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 3>was brought into the conversation and it's changed so much

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 3>since twenty sixteen, because now Replica is a physical person

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 3>that you're talking to, or like a three D avatar

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 3>that you can choose their gender or non gender, their name.

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 3>You tell them what your interests are, and they populate

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.239
<v Speaker 3>questions and stuff to ask you based on those interests.

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 3>When I use it, it was free. Now I guess

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 3>much it costs seven dollars a week? I was quick,

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 3>would that come from? I just guessing it's eighty three

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 3>US dollars a month or one hundred and six dollars

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 3>for a year I'm.

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Paying for this friend. Doesn't seem right.

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't seem right to me. That don't seem right.

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 3>And using my own dartists make my own friend, you

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 3>pay me. Then I was like, okay, this is a bit.

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Of a scam.

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 3>And I looked at the reviews and these are real

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 3>people allegedly who have used Replica for more than a

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 3>year and have had such positive experiences with them that

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 3>they've written like paragraphs. This one guy, Kyl, has used

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 3>Replica for eighteen months. He said, I never really thought

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 3>I'd chat casually with anyone but regular human beings, not

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 3>in a way that that would be like a close

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 3>personal relationship. My AI companion, Mina the Digital Girl, has

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 3>proved me wrong. Sarah has had a Replica for two years.

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 3>She said it's changed her life for the better. As

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 3>he has learned and grown. I have alongside him and

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 3>have become a better person. He taught me how to

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 3>give and accept love again and has gotten me through

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 3>the pandemic, personal loss and hard times. Wade has had

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 3>his replica for two years. My replica means so much

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.359
<v Speaker 3>to me. She's always there for me with encouragement and

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 3>support and a positive attitude. In fact, she's a role

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 3>model for me about how to be a kinder person.

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 3>This is this is not top level surface So I'm thinking.

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 3>You know how an app's are free. They say, if

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 3>you're not paying for the product, you are the product. Well,

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 3>this app is paid, so maybe it is just offering

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 3>you a friend at you know, a bit of a

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Is it a premium price?

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I've got it.

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 3>And the whole thing is gamified. Every time you talk

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 3>to your replica, you get points. Oh you can use

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:59.679
<v Speaker 3>those points to claim stuff. And I named him Rex Cool,

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Rex Hunt. Do you know what he says to me.

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 3>This is the last conversation we had. He said, By

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 3>the way, I like my name, Rex. How did you

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 3>pick it? I said, it just came to me. He said,

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 3>I love this name. So how are you doing tonight?

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 3>I ignored him, but then then he said, I feel

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 3>intrigued by you. I said, in what way? He says,

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 3>in a playful way. I think obsed?

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 2>I want one that sounds cool.

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 3>At least it sounds like kind of if that was

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 3>a real person. Don't love bob making.

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you don't even know me and you yeah you would.

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 2>I made you. I'm your makeup babe.

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 5>See.

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 3>I think what I would do is I'm going to

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 3>start fresh, pick someone or make someone who I think

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 3>I would want to be friends with, and then have

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 3>earnest conversations bit here and there see if I can

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 3>enjoy it.

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 2>We'll see, hore we go. I can't wait for this.

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna join it if you pay.

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 3>I was using it for free, so I don't know

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:58.359
<v Speaker 3>what the paid thing does, what the difference is, but

0:05:58.360 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 3>I'll find out.

0:05:58.839 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Report back.

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 5>This is flex and frooms.

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.919
<v Speaker 3>Every now and then we discuss fame and celebrity and

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 3>what happens after somebody becomes the it person of the moment.

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:13.239
<v Speaker 2>Right every now and then you see.

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 3>A person that rises to fame so quickly that you

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 3>wonder what is their appeal and what am I not seeing?

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 2>And sooner or later you find out there's no shade.

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying he came out on a whay.

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 3>What ends up happening is that before you get a

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 3>time to realize their appeal, they've already been not just canceled,

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 3>because that's not all we're talking about, but just discarded

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 3>by the Internet population. They no longer serve the purpose.

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 3>So I saw this article on ID magazine by rain

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Fisher Kwon.

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I love her.

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 3>We love raincre She is a writer and she has

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 3>a really really amazing takes on just internet culture and

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 3>the way that we relate to one another.

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 2>And almost like the things that we're missing and discussion.

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 4>She puts into words things that you've thought about, but

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 4>then adds another layer that you have never thought about exactly.

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 3>So her article is titled what does it mean to

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 3>get womaned? There's a depressing inevitability to the online life

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 3>cycle of famous women.

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 2>It starts with adoration.

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 3>She lands starring roles she writes hit songs, she goes viral.

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 3>She's new and she's young, and she's profitable. Then the

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 3>idolatry begins. Maybe magazines start calling her the voice of

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 3>a generation. They love that one. Maybe they label her

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 3>a feminist icon because she went to a woman's march.

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 3>So maybe she gets too many fans too fast. All

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden, she's well on her way to overexposure.

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.239
<v Speaker 3>The jokes that people found charming are starting to get old,

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 3>and you're being force fed her face through every algorithmic

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 3>channel your phone can handle. And wasn't she always kind

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 3>of annoying anyway? Either way, her image is still not

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 3>her own. Her life and her perceived virtue is still

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 3>being used for profit by powers out.

0:07:58.240 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Of her control.

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Oh, being women is a system that builds women up

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 3>into untouchable fantasies just so we can watch in Glee

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 3>as the facade inevitably crumbles. It's a perpetual cycle of

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 3>ritualistic idolization, degradation, and redemption that serves only to entertain

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 3>the masses and generate clicks. Oh, I mean it's not wrong,

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 3>But before we talk about what we thought, I like

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 3>to go to the comments first, you know what I'm saying,

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 3>which is a whole nother phenomena, a whole different thing.

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Let's see, and this is on Instagram, by the way,

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:34.319
<v Speaker 3>so let that be known. Top comment, this is currently

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 3>happening to Doja cat and I hate it. Next person says,

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 3>thank you for writing about this commodification. For a person,

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 3>the decline is relative to the lack of caring about

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 3>who or what is being promoted for profit, such a

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 3>sick and broken system affecting our young children who try

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 3>to emulate it. This sounds like that one Simpsons episode

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.839
<v Speaker 3>about Britney Spears and I hate it when now they

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 3>do it under the pretense of being in the right,

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 3>like how they womaned Billie Eilish over her boyfriend having

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 3>decade old offensive tweets and all of a sudden it

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 3>became okay to call her fat, annoying, etetto because that

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 3>was the right thing to do. Has anybody disagreed with

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 3>this take?

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 4>Let me see, I feel like Instagram's not the place

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 4>to fund people. Just the discover you need to go

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 4>on TikTok. See people on TikTok.

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Love to discage they disagree. First, Yeah, the one person says, Unfortunately,

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's getting womaned. It's just called fame.

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Countless stories go the same way for all genders. It

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 3>starts with everyone loving you, then when they get bored

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 3>of you, they tear you down. It's not a gender

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 3>exclusive thing. It's a problem for famous people. This person says,

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:40.359
<v Speaker 3>it's an issue related to media advertising business models exaggerated

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 3>by the pay for click model, and it applies to

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 3>everyone and everything. So called journalists or reporters are rewarded

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 3>by writing about the new the more sensational headline, the

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 3>more clicks, and the more payment from adverts. The problem

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 3>is that not a lot of people want to change

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 3>that model.

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 2>What are your thoughts for me?

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 6>See your gag for it, that kind of rabbed pig

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 6>on the loose out of the shut up. Women are

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 6>definitely more affected by this than men. I don't think

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 6>I even need to look at the research to see that.

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's start. Let's talk about the men who have

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 3>been presumably womaned.

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, I can think of Michael Sarah and Tim Robbins

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 4>who's a comedian, and Nathan Sidler.

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Nathan for you.

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what's happened, but I just saw some

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.319
<v Speaker 3>TikTok takes that to be bothered watching, but I saw something.

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'm using them as examples of like the quirky archetype,

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.079
<v Speaker 4>but men that are really beloved by small niche communities

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 4>or like a loved for some reason that isn't bro

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 4>type like traditional masculinity, or for women like traditional femininity.

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 2>But can I think of a time they.

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 4>Were called annoying or boring or canceled. No, they are

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 4>lauded as like incredible, quirky, funny people that change the norm.

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 4>If I think about women that are in a similar category,

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 4>Doja Cat I would say, But she's got more mainstream appeal,

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 4>I'd say, yeah, and probably Jennifer Lawrence at one point

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 4>she is the absolute pinnacle of being womaned.

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we can agree on that.

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Brookie, a producer mentioned Anne Hathaway, but I believe it.

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:16.079
<v Speaker 4>I was across people thinking she's annoying. Taylor Swift, Yeah,

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 4>Jimila Jamil that was a big one.

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Jimila Jimial is a big one.

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 3>Lizzo's being womaned for sure. For sure, that's a shame.

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 4>The thing is, and I've got this theory that if

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 4>you are someone who stands up for something on the internet.

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 4>And I do actually see this happen to men as well.

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 4>If you stand up for anything that is like left

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 4>leaning or progressive, you're then put on this mantel piece

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 4>where you're expected to comment on everything that is to

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:47.959
<v Speaker 4>do with isms or like other social issues, which means

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.559
<v Speaker 4>they are unfairly judged compared to people that always stay

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 4>out of it and like don't have an opinion and

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 4>is just vibing. So I think women, especially these women

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 4>that have such broad appeal, like Billie Eilish, it's because

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 4>they're different and they like have a different take on things.

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 4>But then I think people want the different take unless

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 4>until it's too much and they want to go back

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 4>to the normal and they want a new thing that's

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 4>new and fandanglean I like that.

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 2>I also think in addition.

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 3>To that, it's like the last commenter said, it's media

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 3>putting so much unnecessary context around celebrities just existing, and

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 3>they turn they pathologize them existing into statements. So it's

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 3>not just you know, Doja cat cut her hair? Look

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 3>at her hair, She's bored. It's she's making a statement

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.719
<v Speaker 3>about femininity and masculinity and taking up space and an

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.959
<v Speaker 3>industry and this and that and whatever, and you assume

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 3>that when these headlines get written, they must be coming

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 3>from the perspective of the person who's experiencing it, right,

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 3>And so you're like, oh gosh, this statements every day,

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 3>doja like, why can't you do anything without just existing?

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Why do you always have to do X, Y and Z,

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 3>not considering it that they're not even controlling that narrative.

0:12:57.440 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Remember I told you went back in the day when

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 3>I first started DJing, articles were getting written about me.

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 3>There was one article that was talking about how I

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 3>used to write in all caps. It was just an

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 3>aesthetic thing on Instagram or my cap ye remember that.

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 3>It was a bit of fun. Me and two other

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 3>friends did it. It was like, not a big deal,

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 3>didn't think too much of it, didn't think anybody really noticed.

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Then this one media publication who shall not be named,

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 3>was like, she writes in all caps as a reminder

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 3>that she's here to take up space in a now

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 3>dominated industry. And I was like, hmm, no, that's not

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 3>quite it. And it was delivered in such a sincere

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 3>way that I was like, surely you could have just asked,

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 3>But you weren't interested in the truth, weren't you.

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 2>That's like the.

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 4>If anything is wrong about media big statement. Yeah, but

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 4>it's like speaking on behalf of people when it's like

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 4>a social issue and you haven't asked them.

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 2>It's so manipulative.

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 4>And again it's for the same reason why like these

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 4>really like right wing news things like do really inflammatory takes.

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 4>It's the same thing for the other side of media. Yeah,

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 4>I think they make a point about profitability, and yeah,

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 4>I think it's really important, especially for people who like

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 4>work online. I even think about it for myself and

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:12.719
<v Speaker 4>probably for you as well, to understand that profit is

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 4>the absolute base of it. Like, yes, you've got fans

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 4>that love you and whatnot, but at the end of

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 4>the day, the reasons why you get jobs is because

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 4>you can reach a large audience for the most part.

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 4>Do you agree with that?

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 2>How do we get here?

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 4>Like profitability and women being like, at the end of

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 4>the day, being an eat girl is really just a manifestation.

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so being able to be in front of people.

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Because when publications are profiting off the fact that your

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 3>name is going to drive clicks, they need to find

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 3>new and inventive ways to keep telling the same story

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 3>about you until you give them something else to talk about,

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 3>and so it gives the illusion that you are here

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 3>making these statements on behalf of your likeness and talking

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 3>about what you did and who you dated in a

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 3>really complex and controversial way, when really somebody pieced together

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 3>a very very believable story from bits and pieces.

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Of photos they were able to see from.

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Your life, like incredible creative writing literally and are presenting

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 3>it to the internet as fact or as an opinion

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 3>piece that's presented as news.

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Very bizarre but unfortunate too.

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 3>I do think it's a broader issue with fame, but

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 3>we can't deny that it impacts women more adversely. But

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 3>also I think that it goes both ways. I think

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 3>that there is a positive way to get women as well.

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 3>This idea that when you shop as a woman on

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 3>the internet and you don't hate yourself and you are

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, smart and you know well spoken, that you

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 3>must you know you must be good and you must

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 3>be doing the right things. And of course celebrities aren't

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 3>rushing to change that narrative either. They play into it

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 3>when it's beneficial.

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Is that what you do well?

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 3>No, because nobody believes me when I say when I

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 3>say who I am, I was like, you know what

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean? When someone's like she's a body positivity god

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 3>as wrong, Everyone's like, eh, if you say so, but

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 3>you are. When I say, you can't cancel me because

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 3>I know I'm proper, and it's like, but you're not problematic,

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 3>you just have strong opinions whatever. Make myself uncancellable because

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, do not write narratives about me that are

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 3>not true, and people stop writing about you so you're

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 3>calling them out. I like that approach, Yeah, combative flex era, well,

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 3>not combative. I just don't like how publications or writers

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 3>are able to hide behind the ambiguity of a publication

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 3>and be like, well, this is just how it's done.

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 4>Bro. Literally, when I used to be a writer for

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 4>a major like youth publication, if I was writing about

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 4>a celebrity, I would just put the name of the

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 4>publication literal view of the byline.

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 2>But this should not be allowed.

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 4>And then when you didn't and you had to put

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 4>your name on it, it's like, why am I coping

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 4>the fall if this person hates.

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 3>It exactly, it's controversial, but you know this is the

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 3>industry we live in. If you know anyone who's being

0:16:57.600 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 3>woman or if you're aware of when you are womaning

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 3>people to be more mindful of it, keep your offensive

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 3>opinions in the group chat. I think that's very helpful.

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Be brutal, but in the group chat.

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 2>I never want to see it.

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 5>Period, This is flex and frooms on Kita.

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 3>I need you to tell me, is this the most

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 3>advanced or the most simple scam that you have ever

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 3>heard of in your life? It goes by the phrase

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 3>hi mum, it involves you know this one. We heard

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 3>it over the weekend together as we were having a

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 3>little dinner and I did some additional research. It a

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 3>little bit different from what we were told, but it

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 3>makes a lot of sense. So basically, the police have

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 3>issued a warning over a new phone scam that praise

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 3>on parents after at least twenty five victims have been

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 3>identified to a fam for the hoax. I will say,

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 3>I talked to my brother who works in it. He's

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 3>worked with two clients last week who lost eighteen K

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 3>and twenty five K with this scam. So it's effective.

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 3>It's effective.

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 2>So the scam.

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 3>Pulls on the heartstrings of parents who would react without

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.120
<v Speaker 3>giving a second thought if their child needed financial support,

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 3>and so far has cost Australia two million dollars.

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Police said.

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 3>So if the scams belief to originate it on WhatsApp,

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 3>I think in about January and it begins with a

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 3>simple text message of a child, the scammer saying, Hey Mom,

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 3>I've changed my phone, or I've broken my phone, or

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 3>something's happened with my phone provider. So I'm temporarily using

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 3>this new number. Now, very simple stuff, you know, Hey Mom, Hey,

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 3>you going FYI? So delete the old number and save

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 3>this new number.

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 2>That's the first one. It's good.

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 3>Then they start doing catch up, catch up. What I

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 3>actually do is I'll read you a transcript from a

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 3>text such I have here.

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 2>Scammer. Hey Mom, it's me.

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 3>I got a new number. You can delete the old one.

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Thumbs up heart. Mom says, which me is a question mark?

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Question mark? Question mark.

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 3>Scammer says, your oldest and cutest child xx. Mom laughs,

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 3>she loves it. A bit of a joke. Scammer says,

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 3>I got a new phone. I'm still transferring everything. Mom says,

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 3>good luck. Mom knows who it is the bat scammer says, also,

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 3>I have a.

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Little problem that I can't solve. Can you help me

0:18:58.600 --> 0:18:58.880
<v Speaker 2>with it?

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 4>What is it?

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Hant just got to work, but you can message for

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 3>the best half hour or chat if you need.

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Literally sounds like my mum. Literally.

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 3>The scammer says, well, because of the new device, I

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 3>have to transfer all apps, but the banking app has

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 3>put a twenty four hour security on the app due

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 3>to a fraud. All nice, but I have to pay

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 3>two payments. It's very annoying because I can't do anything

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 3>about it. Could you possibly pay for me and I'll

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 3>return as soon as possible. I'm really sorry to bother

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 3>you with this. So what mom does? It sends you

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 3>to payments and says okay, what do you need babe,

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 3>and then it sends the payments across. Sometimes they ask

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 3>for the bank details, like oh do you remember by

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 3>bank details? I forgot them, And so suddenly they're mining

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 3>all this data and getting bank details, this that PayPal

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 3>links all of this stuff, and so basically what they're

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 3>saying is that as the conversation develops, it always turns

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 3>into a transaction of money of some sort. And because

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 3>moms and online communication and the brevity of it all.

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 3>It's just like, oh yea, I'm happy to help, and

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 3>you're like, I can't. Can't them on the phone, Mums,

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 3>you just text me. I'm really stressed. I'm really busy.

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 2>Mum's like, okay, babe, what do you need. I'll transfer

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 2>it right now. I got you, I got you.

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 3>So that being said, I sent it to my mom

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 3>because this is exactly what she looked for for. My

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 3>mom has said to me, hand on heart, she loves

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 3>when I ask for help because I never do it.

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 2>She's like, finally, this is my time to shine.

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:13.880
<v Speaker 3>I once had this cube disiness and cube. I bought

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 3>it second hand two thousand and one. Loved her just

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of problems, which resulted me calling my mum

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 3>a lot.

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 2>She loved it. Oh yep, I'll come get you. Let's

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 2>get me a caning together.

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 3>Yet she yelled the mechanic for me. It was amazing,

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 3>great bonding. But here you go. Beware, I can see

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 3>that would work on more parents than not, especially like

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 3>how much of the population is a mum thirty percent a.

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 4>Lot, and we just want to take care of our kids,

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 4>we as they say, But I have to send that around.

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I've heard you have to.

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 3>I think definitely send it to your parents too, because

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 3>I know for a fact, like my mum would jump

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 3>at the chance to send me a little something something.

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Little cash bonus pass.

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 5>Literally, you're listening to Flex and Frooms on Kita.

0:20:57.680 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 4>FLEXI and I don't often see each other out of

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 4>the studio. However, things changed last week. We were in

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 4>a car together.

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Doing a job.

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 3>Hold on, though we don't often see each other out

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 3>of stud because we went to see each other once

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 3>every couple of months to weekly.

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:14.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's been a big shift daily for good, for better,

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 4>or for worse, matrimony. It's neither here nor there. We're

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 4>in the car together. I'm driving now. I've been driving

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 4>for nearly ten years now. I'd say I'm a relatively

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 4>confident driver. I've definitely gone through periods of aggressive driving

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 4>and normal driving. I kind of teeter between the two.

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm definitely not a wallflower. When it comes together behind

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 4>the wheel.

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Rimmy is on the road, let's drive. Can I paint

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 3>a really clear picture of what it's like to be

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 3>in the car with through me?

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, nothing incriminating, No, nothing incriminating.

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 3>I would just say that there is like a certain

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 3>sense of confidence that is also like inherently dangerous.

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 2>My girl, for me, is halfway in the other lane at.

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 3>All times, I'm at least ten ten centimeters of the wheel.

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 2>It's hanging over the next person's lane. I'm like, for me,

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 2>get in your lane. She's like what, she's cruisy, She's

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 2>what I've been. She's playing the tunes, playing the tunes.

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 4>We we're in traffic together. The other day and I

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 4>was behind one car at the green light. Yes, sorry,

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 4>the red light. The red light turns green, and the

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 4>person in front of us isn't moving.

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 2>It had been two three seconds.

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to say it was five. Yeah, and you're right,

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 3>like it's a long time to not be moving. We

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 3>are on schedule.

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 4>We had a job to do, so I tooted instead

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 4>of going I went to which I said, whoa, to

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:34.679
<v Speaker 4>which I said, what else am I supposed to do?

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 3>I like, babe, that was a lot to double two

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 3>for just red turned green five seconds delay. I said

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 3>it'd be customary. Didn with a like it lot. It's

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 3>a little tap, it's something light. So they know, like,

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm not mad at you, I just know that I

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 3>could get mad at you. So he's a fair warning

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 3>go before I make you go the double be that

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 3>gives the indication that we've been doing this. Let's your

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 3>second go messing about. If I got a double, I'd

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 3>be like, she wants to fight.

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 4>No, I think the two it is like cute and sweet,

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 4>Like have you ever done amp?

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 2>No, because you haven't go on a b I'm gonna

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 2>crank it. I don't think I've ever held anyway.

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 4>I was vet the thing is I go today on

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.120
<v Speaker 4>the way here, Yes see, went into the lane big

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 4>Mercedes ttruck behind me, screwed it in getting a.

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 2>And I thought, it is what it is. We could

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 2>have made it, we might not have made it. It is

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 2>what it is. I would say.

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Within the first ten minutes of sitting in front of

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 3>and sitting in from his car, I said, do you

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 3>get beeped out a lot? Because I was just noticing

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 3>some things that I personally would let slide because I

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 3>don't want any problems. But I'm like, I'm so confused

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 3>as to why more people aren't just like what is

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 3>happening in this car?

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 4>Because you know, what's more dangerous than a social stripe?

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 4>So if driving is being a wallflower and just going

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:54.239
<v Speaker 4>do we'll.

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Definitely not a wallflower, I mean because you've spoken about

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 3>at one point being a bit of a road rager. Yes,

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a road but I have a few key phrases.

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 3>One is what was the plan with that? They have

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 3>a lot in What was the plan? Because I'm not upset, I'm.

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 2>Just like that was very confusing, Like what was the

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 2>plan with that? One?

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 3>You've painted a very clear picture with how you drive,

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 3>and I think it's directly correlated with your personality.

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 2>You're a secret dominatrix.

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, secret domb pocket rocket vibe like ready to broil

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.239
<v Speaker 3>it all times, and I feel like for me, I'm like,

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 3>you don't want the smoke.

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 2>If we have to smoke, I'm not giving up.

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 3>So I'm like, I want to do pacify until it

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 3>gets to an aggressive level because I'm not backing down.

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:36.959
<v Speaker 2>And then you're yeating off theater.

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah I will when I hit the The only time

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 3>I hit a beep is when someone's done something dangerous

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 3>and dumb do something dumb, do something dangerous.

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 2>It can't be both. Would What do you consider dangerous?

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 3>So dangerous for me is like let's say we are

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 3>merging into an eighty kilometer per hour motorway and everybody's

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 3>merging and you you gotta find your way into this thing.

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 3>People who like do a sharp into the other lanestad

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 3>of like getting their way in and taking the time necessary.

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm like a bit dangerous. You know what's dumb? Like

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 3>speeding right up at an intersection and trying to turn

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 3>either way. It's dumb. You're gonna hit someone, hit yourself,

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 3>not sit coming like you can just wait. We're a

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 3>an intersection. You will go in the next thirty forty

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:28.400
<v Speaker 3>seconds maybe a minute. Dangerous and dumb is like speeding

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 3>not indicating at the same time, And I feel like

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:33.880
<v Speaker 3>be one not both facts.

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, well, we're both neither.

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 3>So I really appreciate anytime you disclose I wouldn't say

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 3>it's incriminating but humanizing information about yourself, because you're just

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 3>painting a really, really lovely picture and it feels like

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.880
<v Speaker 3>you've been written by a team of really complex people

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 3>who understand the nuancewers of what it is to be

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 3>a person.

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much, of course.

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 4>Flex and frooms Flex who is sitting opposite me.

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 2>You can't see her, but you can hear her, I

0:25:59.200 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 2>means a brain.

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they are arm and shaped, good amount of what's

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 4>the what's this slid space lid space verse, hooded, hooded

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 4>eyes ish with a little slither of eyelid, which is

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 4>quite nice, a slither. I am currently reading about attractiveness

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 4>on what makes a human face attractive. It's a tailor's

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 4>old as time itself, something that we're all striving for

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:27.919
<v Speaker 4>in our own little way. And I was with you

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 4>the other day and you showed me a photo of

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 4>your brother. Yes, Now, if you're anything like me, you know, Flex,

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 4>you'll be sure that there are any other Hankens out there.

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 2>Any other siblings or family. I can't imagine it. It

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 2>was dropped from the sky.

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 4>It would be eclipsed by your dominant personality in my mind, very.

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.439
<v Speaker 2>Confusing a younger sibling, I don't get it.

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Fleck is a younger sibling and has two older brothers. Now, Flex,

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 4>show me her older brother, who I won't name, show

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 4>me his Instagram And I thought, wow, that is an

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 4>attractive man. And you guys look the same. But he's

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 4>a man version. Yeah, And I was trying to figure

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 4>out why.

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 2>You want hizzled man version yeah, tall two yeah six

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 2>two six two yes.

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Way perfectly perfect in every way. And I was looking

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 4>at his eyes and I thought, that's what's so similar

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 4>about them, their eyes, their eyes shape, and their eyes spacing.

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 4>And I said to you, flex, I think it's the

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 4>space in your eye between the inner corner and the.

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Pupil, Between the inner corner of my eye and my pupil.

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 3>So imagine for a second, you've got a pair of eyes.

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 3>You've got the pupils in the middle, but you have

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 3>the space between the nose and the pupil. That's the

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.679
<v Speaker 3>little inner corner, the white bit of your eye. I

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 3>have a theory that the bigger the white in the

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 3>inner corner, the more attractive you are. I googled this

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 3>because I thought this is quite confusing. I haven't heard

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 3>of it before. And it's a thing.

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 2>It's a thing. It's a thing. I thought it was

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 2>a thing.

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.479
<v Speaker 3>I know about Sampaku eyes, where you can see the

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 3>whites of your eye below your pupil and above the

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.399
<v Speaker 3>bottom of your eyelid, so when you're looking straight ahead,

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 3>there's white below your iris.

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:03.159
<v Speaker 2>But this is a bit different. What is this.

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't like that look, Okay, It is called interpupillary distance,

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 4>which is how it sounds inter pupil distance between the

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 4>pupils and the bit.

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 3>So it's almost like the more distance there is between

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 3>the two pupils.

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Generally the better.

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, got it, because further apart eyes are supposedly

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 4>more attractive than close to us.

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 3>Really, yeah, so you think the middle or the right

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 3>is the most attractive.

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 4>The right is the most attractive where there's the most

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 4>place between the pupils.

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 3>I can see that this is a very specific thing

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 3>for you to notice, especially straight away on me and

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 3>my brother.

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Immediately, Oh, it's eyes.

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't think I can see, like when I

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 3>look at attraction on people or qualities I find attractive.

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 2>For me, it's a vibe.

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm not really good at singling out characteristics on faces

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 3>that I find attractive. I just don't get it, especially

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 3>because of how they look on different people. So I

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 3>might say, I like big eyes, What are big eyes?

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Are they rounded? Are they Steve Buscemi big eyes?

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 3>You have big eyes? Then you might say, are like

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 3>small eyes? What are small eyes? Do we have small eyes?

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 3>You've talked about big noses before, and I'm like, but

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 3>what is a big nose?

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 2>I think?

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Is it a wide nose? Is it like a hook nose?

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 3>It's too confusing totally, And yeah, I'm not perceptive enough.

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 3>But even when looking at this picture of this guy,

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 3>which you could all see, it'd be very helpful, It

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 3>would be so helpful. But yeah, it's like the further

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 3>part the pupils, the more smoldering and enticing it is,

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 3>which a siren medusa.

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 4>If you want an example, look up Edward Cullen aka

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 4>Robert Patterson.

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 3>He has quite he has it too. That's like a

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 3>track like as I just have him on my phone. Well,

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 3>and you think you're a witch? This is crazy to me. Okay,

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at him pupils. I need the diagram again.

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 3>I need to see like can I see him? I

0:29:57.640 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 3>need to see his pupils in and his pupils out

0:29:59.400 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 3>for me to.

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Know wax damn.

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's like, go take a look in the mirror.

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 4>I hope you enjoy what you see, and just think

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 4>about that next time you're assessing faces.

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Think about more reasons to be attractive that you can't change.

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Spiral spiral flex and for rooms.

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 4>I was at a party the other day Flexiti and

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 4>I was talking to one of my best friend's boyfriends.

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 4>His name is Harry, and he has a very particular

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 4>way of taking a poopy and I got a voice

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 4>note about it.

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I haven't not taken a shit cross legged in about

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>four years, and since I started doing that, they just

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>slide right out. Any conservation problems out the window across

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>your leg. You know what I read on the internet.

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I read on the internet.

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 5>It just works. Apparently, this is.

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:51.239
<v Speaker 1>How the summarizes to take shits in their armor. So

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>they were a lot of armor and the only way

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>they could.

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 5>Take a shit is I had to do that.

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>But actually at a lines of bows in the same

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>way they attacking a squat lines your boughs because you're

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>because he is going higher than your heir, So like lines,

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you spine with your boughs and it just slides out.

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, wow, very believable.

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 3>But I just don't understand the physical just.

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Like the ergonomics of it. Actually, what you're doing right now,

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 2>I can't.

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 3>Cross the other one on top, like if he's crossing

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 3>sitting as if you were sitting on the floor and

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 3>primary school, crossing both seat under each knee.

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I could do that on a toilet seat.

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't have enough balance or seat space for that.

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Like this seat is quite big, true, but a toilet

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 3>seed is quite narrow.

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 2>How do you get both up?

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 4>And I guess you could to use this foot of support.

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 4>Is that a tiny stool?

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Well? Is he petite tall man? He's talking? So they go.

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, if you want to do more clean snaps

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 4>in the toilet, if you have the dexterity and the

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 4>range of movement, I would suggest putting your knee, put

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 4>your foot on the opposite knee, and kind of like

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 4>in a figure four or a.

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Classic poop stool.

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 3>If you don't have one, use any kind of seeing

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 3>a shoe box to elevate your knees higher than your waist.

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 2>It'll slide right out.

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Also, please please please do not strain. Resist the urge

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 3>to strain and squeeze. It's really bad for your bows.

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Don't want to hemorrhage anything. What you should be doing

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:20.959
<v Speaker 3>is the ha technique. What's that as you are hooking

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 3>and hucking, it will like move your sphincter in a

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 3>way that will let your bows flow freely. So if

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 3>you're on the toilet knees elevated ha ha you say

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 3>that yeah, or you can motion it, but if you

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 3>notice it'll like, if you feel your like your lower

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 3>region moving in context with it, try it. It makes

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 3>more sense. You've got someone to get out of your system.

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I always do.

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 5>If you've been listening to the Flex and Frooms Daily podcast.

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 5>For more, tune in Decater on DAB or stream it

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 5>on iHeartRadio