WEBVTT - Influencer Break Ups, When Private Facebook Groups Turn Public & Suddenly 30

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Outspoken. The podcast is not afraid to say

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:06.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you're thinking. Our names are Amy Kate and

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Sophie Torba. We're identical triplets, but we often don't have

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>identical opinions, so sometimes things can get heated. Outspoken covers

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>all things reality TV, influencers, entertainment, and issues facing women.

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 2>That is so fat.

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Outspoken Fridays Now. A post by a Stan

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of Anna Paul has got us thinking today because this

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 1>fan shared a tattoo she had of Anna Poul in

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:41.279
<v Speaker 1>bikinis on her arm. I really wanted to know if

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>you guys had to get a tattoo of someone in

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>pop culture, an influencer, a celebrity, and so if you

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.480
<v Speaker 1>can't say your dog Archie, who would it be? Well,

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I do remember seeing there was a fan of Money

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Heist who got a big tattoo of Tokyo, one of

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the characters on his leg, and he met her at

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the Red carpet and she just was like, it's such shock.

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I love Money highst. I can't actually imagine getting a

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Money Highest tattoo, though, Well, you got to come up

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>with something. Who would you get? Actually also reminds me

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of the time that Saffron Barker tricked her mum that

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>she got her mum's face tattooed on a leg. Can

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>we for our parents on LG No, at at all.

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>It has to be pop culture related. I might even

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>make it more specific. If you guys had to get

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>an Australian influencer on your arm, who would it be? Oh?

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>My god, can I say Bindi Shinny Grumman's dog. Oh,

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 1>she's pretty iconic.

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't think of anybody. I mean, I just I'm

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.479
<v Speaker 1>not a tattoo person. So the thought of having an

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>influencer's face on my arm, I just I can't even

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>imagine it. Can you imagine in twenty years time coming

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to your kids and they're like, who's that on your arm? Mum?

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And you're like, oh, just an influencer I used to follow. Well,

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you know what, this girl had some pretty cool body art,

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>so it wasn't just I mean, if you Sophie just

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>got one random tattoo at a peril days he slapped

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>my arm, Kate, what about you? Is anyone you'd ever

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>consider getting tattooed on your arm in the pop culture space? Well, look, no,

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I would never do it, but if I had to

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>pick someone, I'd probably say Taylor Swift. Feel he's not

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.119
<v Speaker 1>an influencer, but she's in the set in the pop

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>culture space. Okay, we're gonna put a thread in our

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Facebook community. We'd love to know which influencer or person

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in pop culture you would get tattooed on your arm.

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Entire Channel four News team. I'm Veronica Corningstone.

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Ron Burgundy.

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Goof yourself, san Diego.

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>When Lilah Vocalin turned to a closed women's Facebook group

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to ask for advice, she never imagined her private messages

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>would end up in the mainstream media. Lila asked group

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>members of the Tea Time Facebook community what she should

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>do after she realized her psychologist had liked and messaged

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>her on dating app Hinge. Now, Amy, can you explain

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>more so, Lilah shared screenshots of messages on Hinge from

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a man who she says is her psychologist. The first

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>message from the man read hey with love heart eye emojis.

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>He wrote, I feel like we've matched before. Leela responded,

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>aren't you my psych to which he replied, oh that's

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>why you look familiar. Sorry, I deal with lots of

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>clients and it's hard to keep up. How have you

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.959
<v Speaker 1>been so as you can see, Instead of shutting down

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 1>the conversation, it appeared her psychologists tried to keep initiating

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>conversation between the pair on the dating app. Now, according

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to APPRA, which is the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency,

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>practitioners are expected to act in their patient's best interests

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and not use their position of power and trust to

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>exploit patients physically, sexually, emotionally or psychologically. Now, not only

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>does Lila say that her post in the private Facebook

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>group was leaked to the psychologist, who has since threatened

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to sue her for defamation, which is just disgusting in itself,

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>she also woke up to find that numerous online articles

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>were written by mainstream media publications about her post. Now,

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>according to the Facebook group's rules, this is a privacy breach.

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Wila also says she was never contacted for comment. Now,

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Wila is kindly joining us. Thank you so much for

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>coming on the show. Firstly, we're just so sorry to

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>hear about how all of this has blown up. How

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:15.839
<v Speaker 1>are you feeling very overwhelmed?

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Anxious?

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 3>Kind of like everything's out of my control, but there's

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 3>not really anything I can do, So I'm kind of

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 3>just sitting back and seeing what happens.

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>And how did you feel when you first realized that

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you had matched with your psychologist on hinge?

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 2>It raised a lot of red flags for me.

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:39.359
<v Speaker 3>I didn't I don't really think that I kind of

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:43.239
<v Speaker 3>gathered what was happening initially. I just knew it was wrong,

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 3>and I kind of quick Google, like is this okay?

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Like I know, you know, like teacher student relationships, Like

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:50.840
<v Speaker 3>that's not all right.

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>And after you found out that you had matched with

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>him on hinge, you then decided to post about your

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>experience on a Facebook group called Tea Time. Can you

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>tell us what you wrote and also why you felt

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>compelled to share that experience on Tea Time.

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.799
<v Speaker 3>I don't like saying that I matched with him because

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 3>I think that he was the one that kind of

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 3>first instigated the compact. Like with the way that hinge

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 3>works is that you can see who liked you first.

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 3>And because it was under a fake name, there were

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 3>two people in the photo. I didn't really realize at

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 3>the time until he sent that message through. Yeah, so

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 3>I posted in tea time. I was talking to my

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 3>housemate about it and kind of said, like, this is

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 3>just what's happened, Like what do you think?

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 2>And she was like, nah, like that's not.

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but like can she She actually was the one

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 3>who told me about tea time, and she said that

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 3>there's a really good girls group. It's very supportive, like

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 3>very feminist, like they're quick to call things out. Why

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 3>don't you like post in there, have a like, have

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 3>a look at what those girls have to say, and

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 3>then yeah, make a decision from there. So yeah, I

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of I was just seeking out women's support and

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 3>advice really.

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's why everyone our kind of age does, isn't it.

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>These groups have sort of become a safe place for

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>women to be able to share this sort of information,

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's also good to get other people's opinions maybe

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>on what to do and how best to tackle the situation.

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 1>So I definitely think if I was in a similar situation,

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd want to reach out to, you know, like minded

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>people online and get that sort of support too.

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Yep, And you raised a really good point. You said

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that you didn't actually match with your psychologists. Are you

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>able to explain because there's been a bit of misinformation

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>going on. I think a lot of people just think

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of Tinder when they think of dating apps, but Hinge

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is obviously a little bit different.

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 3>So the way that Hinge works is that there's a

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 3>little icon there that you click on and you can

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 3>see everybody who has like like like you, and you

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 3>can actually send messages without the other person matching with you. Basically. Yeah,

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 3>so I just went into that little icon. I was

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 3>just mindlessly scrolling in a bit of a zombie mode,

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 3>and I pressed the tick and like, because his name

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 3>was a fake name, there were two people in his photo,

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 3>and yes, I.

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Clicked on him.

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 3>This was I think on Tuesday, February fifteenth, and I

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 3>don't even think I saw the message until three or

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 3>four days later when he did send me that message

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 3>like with the hey, with the love hard eyes, haven't

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 3>we matched before? Kind of insinuating that I looked familiar,

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 3>which makes me think that he definitely did know who

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 3>I was when he sent that.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>And you immediately tried to shut this conversation down. You

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>were like, aren't you my psychologist?

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Exactly? Yep.

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>It's just such a gross breach of power. I just

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>can't believe that these sort of things going on, and

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I just can't imagine. Also, how you must have felt

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>when you woke up in the morning and saw your

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>story plastered all over mainstream media.

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that was a real shock to the system, just

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 3>because I had posted in a closed, private women's Facebook

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 3>group just asking for advice. Turns out that journalist Matilda

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Rudd was in that group. She stole my story, and yeah,

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 3>now it's everywhere. It was on Daily Mail, it was

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 3>on these random US news sites, Channel seven news dot com.

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Now it's very overwhelming, but.

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it must be, especially because in the group it

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>clearly states there are rules that there is privacy for

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>members and that journalists are not able to take information

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and share it. Were you ever actually contacted by the

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>journalists who wrote the story?

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 3>So there's been three journalists who have written stories now,

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 3>so Matilda Rudd was the first one that was for

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Daily Mail. She never contacted me. I actually made an

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 3>attempt to contact her when I first saw that the

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 3>news article had been published.

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 2>I first contacted Daily Mail.

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 3>To issue a complaint asking them to take it down,

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 3>but I never heard back, and then I contacted Matilda

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 3>through her Instagram DMS. I sent her a very polite

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 3>message just saying that I wasn't ready for this to

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 3>be publicized, because you please take it down.

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 2>I never heard back from her either. Part of me

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 2>does want to.

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Have this publicized, because I do want to speak out,

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 3>but I think that I also want to wait until

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 3>just to see what happens with Opera and the hate

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Treple C and to see if I can actually publicize

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 3>his name, because right now I can't say his name

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 3>at all, which I think he deserves to have his

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 3>name out there.

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, definitely, I suppose that's been the issue with

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 1>the reporting. I mean that Sofa and I have witnessed

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>so far is that it's all sort of been on you,

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like, because you are young and you're attractive,

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>they've chosen a lot of photos of you, taken stuff

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you've said out of context, and that's obviously led to

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of commentary online as well that hasn't been

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>so nice. How have you felt reading some of these

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>comments from people who were almost blaming you. I mean,

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.439
<v Speaker 1>we personally think there's a lot of victim blaming going on.

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh one hundred percent.

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 3>I've been reading the comments on The comments on the

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 3>news dot com.

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Article on Facebook particularly bad. A lot of old men.

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 3>I think I read one saying, well, she's a basket case.

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 3>She sees a psychologist. He knew what he was getting

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 3>into her, getting in with her, dodged a bullet. There

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot of things like that, things like well she's

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 3>wearing a swimsuit, like, what does she expect?

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 2>That was one of them.

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, just really really nasty, misogynistic victim blaming comments.

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Now, you did make a really great point on Instagram

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>how when women speak out about male's predatory behavior, they're

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 1>often slap with legal action. What has the fallout been

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>from the psychologist.

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 3>I haven't heard from him since he threatened me, so

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 3>basically oft he must have seen the tea time post,

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 3>like the initial one that I posted.

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 2>It got leaked to him somehow, and he sent me.

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 3>A message saying that I should expect to be hearing

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 3>from his lawyer over the next week or so. In

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 3>regards to defamation, that didn't really scare me much because

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 3>I know there's no grounds for defamation there. But I

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 3>think that it's all too common that when a man

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 3>is in a position of power, not even necessarily in

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 3>a position of power, just men. They just want to

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 3>intimidate women, and like they throw around, throw around these

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 3>words like legal action just to try and scare you

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 3>pretty much and try and get you to back down

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 3>and try and.

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Get you off their case. But like in this case,

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 2>it's not going to work.

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I love that, and that is so true, and it's

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>quite interesting because I feel like your story has raised

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions about just how private these facebooks

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>actually are, especially groups like Tea Time, which have so

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>many thousands of followers. What would be your advice to

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.439
<v Speaker 1>people who do post on these groups in the future.

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 3>I think with social media, you're always taking a risk

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 3>with what you put out there.

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 2>I had to look at the Tea.

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Time members and it is something like eighty thousand, so

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 3>I didn't realize it was that big, but I guess, yeah,

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 3>I was taking a risk. But it was also a

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 3>closed women's Facebook group, and you know, in our day

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 3>and age, there's so much like going around, like especially

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 3>on social media, about like women's empowerment, women supporting one another,

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 3>and yeah, to have a woman do this to.

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Me is it's a really gross violation.

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 3>So I know, of Tea Time, you can post anonymously

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 3>if you If you private message the admins, they'll post

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 3>for you.

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:09.559
<v Speaker 2>So I'd say yeah.

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 3>In the future, if there's any girls who think that

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.079
<v Speaker 3>what they what they want to post could be a

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 3>bit risky, did I just posted anonymously?

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, thank you so much for joining us, and congratulations

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>on taking a stance against this type of behavior. Because

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>your statement that you put up on Instagram was amazing

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and we'll have to link it in our show notes

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone can have a read. And also the fact that

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you are twenty one. It blows my mind. You have

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>just spoken so articulately and also so bravely, as Amy said,

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>especially when this person is obviously sought out to try

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and silence you. So congratulations for the amazing way that

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you have responded to it.

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>This week, Brittany Hockley confirmed she has split with tennis

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>player boyfriend Jordan Thompson. She made the tiery announcement on

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>her Life Uncut podcast after months of rumors. The former

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Bachelor star explained our constant speculation had strained her relationship

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>as the pair tried to make a decision about the future,

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and it was really hard not to feel extremely sorry

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.079
<v Speaker 1>for Britt. As she shared the update, she spoke about

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>how she couldn't get out of bed and couldn't stop crying,

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>all while dealing with the media and fans demanding an update.

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>So BRIT's situation got me thinking about how much privacy

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>influences and public figures should be afforded when it comes

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to breakups. Do we have the right to know exactly

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>when it happens? Shall we get to know the ins

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and outs and the reason for the breakup? And why

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>do we think we deserve to know? What do you

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>guys think? Well, I've previously discussed on the podcast how

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I do think influencers who monetize their relationships on the

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>platform are somewhat indebted to sharing relationship updates. However, BRIT's

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>reaction has really made me see another side to it,

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and it kind of makes me reflect on my own

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>breakup experiences and I can't imagine how difficult it would be,

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly when a lot of the time when you do

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>break up with someone, there is that period where you

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>get back together. I feel like when an influencer is

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>going through that phase of on and off again relationship,

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to then inform everyone's what's happening, because

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>most of the time you don't really know what's going

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>on in your relationship yourself, particularly in their situation where

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like it was pretty amicable and the only

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>reason they really were breaking up was because of the

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>long distance nature of their relationship. And I feel like

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>brit was quite quick to point out that they're breaking

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>up for now, but you never know what is going

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to happen in the future. And personally, I would find

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that really difficult to then jump on a mic and

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>dissect that relationship, because, as she said, it would almost

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>be easier if you hated that person. I know, when

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I was going through a breakup, I had that little

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>glimmer of hope that maybe we were going to get

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>back together. And on a lesser scale, it's kind of

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>like when you have a bitch to your friends about

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>your ex boyfriend and what a dickhead they've been, and

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly you think it's back on again, and you've

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of got to, you know, come crawling back to

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>everyone saying how wonderful they are trying to win people over. Gosh.

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I have been there so many times in my first relationship,

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>because my first relationship was very toxic. It was very

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>off and on, and I remember feeling so embarrassed when

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I have to tell you guys or Mum or any

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of my friends that, hey, actually I've accepted that behavior

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and taken him back. And I'm not saying that is

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>at all what's going on with Britt and Jordan. But

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you reflect back on your relationships and

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the terminals that you've gone through, it's hard not to

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>feel sorry for someone in the public eye that then

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>has to communicate outwardly to followers and media about their

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>relationship and what's happened in those everyday situations. It's really

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>awkward for the friend as well who has had the

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>person bitch to them, because half the time you end

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>up putting your foot in it, agreeing with your friend

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>who's been dumbed, And then when that person comes back

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>in the picture, it's always very awkward, yeah, because you

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>almost need to hold your tongue the first time someone

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>says they've broken up with somebody because you say what

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you honestly thought of them, and then next week they're

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>back together, but just circling back to Brits so her

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>announcing the split to all of the life uncut followers.

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:06.719
<v Speaker 1>That is the final nail in the coffin of this relationship.

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>And as you said, she might have held hope that

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe she and Jordan would get back together. Well, it

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>seems like that two weeks over Samma was very much

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>them seeing what it would be like and maybe having

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>those difficult conversations about where is this going. And it

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:23.400
<v Speaker 1>would be really difficult to have those conversations when there

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of speculation going on about it online.

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 1>In terms of followers feeling like they deserve to know

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the ins and outs of influencers breakups, I really feel

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.679
<v Speaker 1>like it comes down to parasocial relationships that we build

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>with influencers online, And for those who don't know, a

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>parasocial relationship is essentially a one way relationship with an influencer, celebrity,

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>or brand that feels like a two way relationship. So

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>social media has really increased these parasocial relationships we have

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>because it provides an intimate and personal look into someone's

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>life and it gives us a feeling that we know

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>them when we really don't. So I think that we

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>believe we're in titled to know what's going on with

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>these influencer relationships because we feel like we've gone through

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the experience with the influencer. And I think another aspect

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>comes down to Instagram's algorithm, because the platform really rewards

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>users for going big with their posts and sometimes monetizing them. So,

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, you'll notice that announcements around big life events

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>like engagements and pregnancies often garner the most likes for influencers,

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's also the case for normal people as well.

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>And this then results in influencers curating their feed only

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to show the highlights, and they end up presenting the

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>best possible view without the whole story. And this all

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>has a trickle down effect to normal Instagram users as well,

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like due to this highlight sharing, Instagram

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.719
<v Speaker 1>has become a place where people go and see content

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that makes them sometimes feel inadequate or jealous about their

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>own lives. And inadequacy is often felt about people's own

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>relationships when they compare them to everyday life to the

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>highlight reel of influencers. So when influencers do break up

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>with their partners, it kind of feels like a car

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>crash scenario where you know you should look away, but

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you just can't because you're so curious about what's happened

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and how this perfect relationship failed. I think the other

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>thing is just human nature. When you do start dating

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 1>someone and it's the honeymoon stage, you do post more

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>about that person because you're really excited to let everyone

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>know that you're in a new relationship. And I think

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that's obviously the case for everyday people and influencers, and

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately for influencers, because we are so interested in their

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>lives and comparing how they are to theirs. I think

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of followers pick up when things start to

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>slow down. So suddenly, when we don't see that relationship

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 1>online anymore, a bit like with Britt and Jordan, we

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 1>begin to speculate why, and it just kind of builds

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 1>that anticipation and that appetite to know what happened, and

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, we also think that there must be way

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 1>more to it than they're so invested. You're so invested

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>sometimes in these people you don't know'se relationships than in

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>your friends relationships. It's so it's true, so strange, and

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I do feel like some people actually use influencers pitfalls

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>as a way to keep their behavior in check as well.

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>So if the influencer does something in their relationship that

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't align with your values. When they do break up,

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you kind of see that as a win to yourself, like, oh, well,

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't have done that, so that means I'm correct

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in my behavior and how I navigate relationships. I also

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 1>think it must be quite difficult for people in the

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>public eye to openly speak about relationship breakdowns when they

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 1>feel like their partner might not have a right of reply.

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>And in the situation with Britt and Jordan, of course

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>he is a public facing person being a tennis player,

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>but he's not someone who openly talks about their relationship

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>on his Instagram account. And I think that she's also

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>taken that very much into consideration. And I think there

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 1>is a slight difference if you are a YouTube or

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Instagram couple and you've built your following around your relationship

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>in that situation, you do then owe your audience an

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>explanation of what happened and what went down, because a

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of these Instagram couples do glamorize their relationship and

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>monetize it as well. Yeah, well, that's why I think

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>there is such an appetite to find out about breakdowns

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of relationships because influencers in the past have shared so

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>much about their relationships. So as you said on YouTube,

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and we have seen so many influencers who have come

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>out and done full breakdown debriefs on their channel, and

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>then it sets the precedence that everyone wants to know

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>more and more and more about different influencers relationships.

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Not a Gelly, you've got in your hair smells quite

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 2>strongly too. Why are you telling this to me now?

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm just mentioning it. I can see you've got a

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 2>lot in That's all I don't. I mean, I can't

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 2>wash it now, can I've not got time. God, I

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 2>don't know why you are like this.

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes, as we approach our joint thirty third birthday next month,

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>we've been chatting with some of our friends about the

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>immense pressure women face to not only beat the biological clock,

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>but also keep a grasp on your social currency. So

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>if I know you've been a little bit stressed about

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 1>our birthday coming up, I wouldn't say I've been stressed

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>about it. I just feel for women who are entering

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>their thirties because I feel like there's so much pressure

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 1>from society on your shoulders, and you suddenly realize when

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you are in your thirties that there's all these boxes

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that you're supposed to have ticked by the time you're

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 1>in that age demographic. And I feel like I've fed

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>such a different story in your twenties because you're always told, oh,

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty of time, you can make mistakes, just have

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>fun dating people, don't settle for anyone, and you're really

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>on this journey of finding out who you are and

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>what you want to be. And I found in my

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>twenties I was constantly being told I was too young

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>or too inexperience for certain jobs. But then suddenly, out

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of nowhere, when your thirtieth birthday rolls around, You're supposed

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 1>to have this incredible job. You're supposed to have a

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>solid income, own a home, you're supposed to be settling down.

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>There's all these things, having kids, and I just think

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:56.679
<v Speaker 1>it's this ridiculous expectation, particularly on women, and I just

0:22:56.720 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>feel like there's this ticking time bomb that we've got going.

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>And I've also found from personal experience as someone who

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>was forced to look for a new job when I

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>was in my thirties, that I thought once I got

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>into my thirties that I would be taken more seriously.

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>But I've found it's quite a hindrance because people assume

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to be getting married and having children,

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and they don't necessarily want to employ someone that's going

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to go on a maternity contract, even if that's not

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>in your plan. I've just noticed that my Facebook and

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Instagram feed has literally just turned into baby pictures as well,

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:32.199
<v Speaker 1>and just everyone's getting married, everyone's having babies, and you

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of feel a bit left behind if you're not

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>doing that, or you feel even weird that you might

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>not even want to think about kids at the moment. Yeah,

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>there's like this fucked up expectation that makes many of

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>us feel inadequate or unsuccessful if you haven't done those

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>things at the perceived right time, when they may not

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>even be things that you even want to be doing then.

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And as thirty approaches, I feel like people suddenly find

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>it appropriate to point out to women of that age

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 1>that their biological clock is ticking and that if we

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>don't hurry up, will lose the opportunity to have a

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>family one day, and one many women don't necessarily want

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to have children or many women may not be able

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:13.159
<v Speaker 1>to have children. You never know what's going on in

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>someone's life, and I feel like it's really unfair for

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>people to put these questions and assumptions towards women of

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a certain age. And even just having a podcast that's

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in the influencer space, I've noticed so much agism going

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>on on social media. People who are in their thirties.

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>They're often spoken about by young influencers as if we're

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>almost dead. It's actually quite depressing because I don't feel

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>any different to how I felt in by twenties at all,

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and I've just noticed so much shit talk about people

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>in their thirties going on, Yeah, that's the thing. Suddenly,

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 1>when you find yourself outside of the twenties demographic that

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you never thought you'd leave, you made to feel as

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>though your social currency is waning. And I feel like

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>so many of us go through a bit of an

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>identity crisis. I know when we were turning thirty, I

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>suddenly started to second guess the clothes that I was wearing.

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>So usually in summer I just wear denim shorts and

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>chuck on a white top, and I even was thinking,

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>is this appropriate for a thirty year old to be wearing. God,

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 1>of course it is. And I think that's why we

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>saw such a meltdown with skinny jeans and the side part,

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>because we've always been the young generation. We've always been

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>setting the trends, and suddenly this younger generation was telling

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>us that we're the epitome of uncle m. And that's

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the thing. I'm so torn on this because quite often

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 1>I feel myself saying this to other women, because a

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of the time, when you say your age, automatically

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>women or men will go, don't worry, you don't look

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that old. And I think it's actually quite a harmful

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>thing to say to people, because being older shouldn't necessarily

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.120
<v Speaker 1>be a negative thing. I feel like it's this constant

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>pursuit to be young, which is actually really damaging and

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>really harmful to women. And I personally have to stop

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 1>at myself as I get older. I really do feel

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>for women who are also older than ourselves, because I've

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:00.880
<v Speaker 1>always heard this whisper going around that, you know, people

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>in their forties start to feel invisible, and in my thirties,

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I can already see that happening. As we've established, Yeah,

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I think many women do start to feel invisible, and

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 1>it's really because society places an overwhelming amount of importance

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>on women's appearance and I hate the term, but on

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>women's fuck ability. So many of us have grown up

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>internalizing this notion that there is only currency in our

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>appearance and staying youthful. And I feel like for so

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>long in TV shows and movies there's really been an

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>absence of women of a certain age, even on television

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>news in Australia, and I think that the older women become,

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 1>the less they see themselves, particularly in pop culture, and

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>it can become very polarizing if you don't see anyone

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 1>like you out there, and the only women who are

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>getting granted these positions are women who look a hell

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of a lot younger than they are and don't actually

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:56.199
<v Speaker 1>reflect what the average forty fifty, sixty seventy year old

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>woman looks like. And at the moment people are seeing

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Jesca Park has appear pearance as being some sort

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of beacon because she actually looks her age and we

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>aren't used to seeing women on TV without filly in

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>their face. But I have loved watching just like that.

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>And I did hear Mia Friedman talking about how much.

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people don't think that fifty year old

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>lives are actually like that, and it's like young people

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>just stick to their own lane and they don't realize

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>that you're still the same person, and as you get older,

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>you're still gonna have dramas in your life, and things

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 1>still happen after you turn thirty exactly. I mean, I

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like the criticism of Sarah Jessica Parker's appearance has

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>been so unfair. I actually thought she looked incredible, and

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the fact that she hadn't had any work

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>actually made her appear much more youthful. That's the thing

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 1>I feel like now, especially because we are living in

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a social media era, I feel like as soon as

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:49.199
<v Speaker 1>you turn thirty, you also start thinking about whether you

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>in fact need certain cosmetic procedures done, or whether you

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>should start investing in some really expensive skin care. And

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I vividly remember when I was twenty nine going to

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 1>a mark A stall and this woman was selling a

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of skincare products and she asked me how old

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I was, and I told her, and she said, and

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>this isn't a humble brag, She said, Wow, I thought

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you were a lot younger I thought you were in

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 1>your early twenties, and she said, wow, we really should

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>start you on some botox then, and I just thought,

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>hold on a second. You've just told me how apparently

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 1>young I look, and now you're telling me in the

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 1>next breath that I need to start cosmetic procedures. And

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, it's definitely up to

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the individual what they want to do, because I think

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it is something that makes women feel a lot more

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>confident in their skin. And if that's what you want

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to do, that's your decision. But I don't think women

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>should be told by other people that they it's something

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that they need to do, and I don't think we

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>should be scared of getting wrinkles and looking older. Also,

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that woman's talking about it as if it's just a

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>obvious step when you hit your thirties that you have

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to then freeze any sort of signs of life on

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>your face. And as you said, Sophia, if that's what

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>someone wants to do, but people should be okay with

0:28:56.720 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>not choosing that as well, because that is an individual's choice.

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I really hope moving forward that society stops categorizing women

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>by their age, because it's not really something that we

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>do to men, and I feel like by doing it,

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it just puts an expiration date on women's success or

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>what women are and aren't allowed to do. So I

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's all we've got time for today. Thank you

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us for another episode, and if

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to join in on the conversation, head over

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to our Facebook community, which is outspoken of the podcast community. Also,

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>we'd love it if you could leave us a five

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>star review