WEBVTT - Meta has removed fact checking. Why?

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Already, and this is the daily This is the Daily OS. Oh,

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>now it makes sense. Good morning, and welcome to the

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Daily OS. It's Thursday, the ninth of January. I'm Zara,

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Sam. Yesterday, Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg announced major changes

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to the company's social media moderation policies. In a video

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>posted to socials, Zuckerberg said Meta would no longer use

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>independent fact checkers in a move to restore what he

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>called free expression for its users, and also to reduce

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the number of mistakes he believed had been made. It's

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>a significant departure for the social media behemoth and has

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>drawn praise from ex owner Elon Musk and incoming US

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>President Donald Trump.

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 2>It's crazy to think that there was a time without Meta.

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean yeah, it's pretty much one of the companies

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 2>that shapes the twenty first century.

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Evasive in every part of my life.

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 2>And it's continuing to change.

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>My partner on Meta, and my business exists on Meta.

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:09.119
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent hit rate for Meta.

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 2>It's in every part of our lives. And that's why

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 2>these changes are so important to talk about. Before we

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 2>get to the changes themselves, what was the state of

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 2>play before this announcement.

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So since twenty sixteen, Meta has used what it

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>called third party moderators to essentially identify false claims, misinformation, disinformation,

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and hoaxes on all of its platforms, so across Facebook, Instagram,

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 1>and WhatsApp. In his video, Zuckerberg said that after Donald

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump won the election back in twenty sixteen, so not

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 1>this most recent time, but back then, he said that

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>legacy media wrote NonStop about how misinformation was a threat

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:50.279
<v Speaker 1>to democracy, and Zuckerberg said that Meta, as a result

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of all of that discourse and as a result of

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess that concern, he said that Meta tried in

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>good faith to address those concerns. And that's why these

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>fact checkers were in introduced in the first place as

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>an almost response to the election of Donald Trump, which

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting point that we'll get to a bit later.

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>And so the way that it has worked up until

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>now is that these moderation teams, and there's about ninety

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>organizations across dozens of countries who work as part of

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>these teams. What they do is look very closely at

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>content that either they or other users have identified as

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>being false or misleading. So you, as a user can

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>identify something, can click and say this is hate speech

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>or this is misinformation or whatever it is. That's then

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:38.239
<v Speaker 1>reviewed by these people. The moderators then rate the accuracy

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of the post based on their factual review, and med

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>can then add a warning label and the fact check

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>is rating to the posts and then reduce its distribution,

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>so affect how that post can be seen across the algorithm.

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 2>And that's where you also see those kind of lighter

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 2>boxes underneath the post that says this might not be true.

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Here's a link to a government website. Remember, particularly in

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 2>the pandemic, there was a lot of those underneath posts

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 2>about vaccines or about the spread of the virus. So

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 2>that's the way it's worked until now. Talk me through

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 2>what Mark Zuckerberg announced via a short video yesterday and

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 2>what his thinking was behind this one eighty.

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, to the thinking point. It is fairly rare

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that Mark Zuckerberg takes us through his thinking on something.

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of high profile people who work

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.639
<v Speaker 1>at metas so when it comes to Instagram, Adamisari is

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the head of Instagram and he's announced a lot of

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the changes. But this came clearly from the top, and

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense. It's a huge change. So essentially, the

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>biggest change among them is that those fact checkers that

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I was just talking about, the ones who are reviewing

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the content.

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 2>The ninety organization, Yes, they're no.

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Longer gone done goodbye. And to add some color as

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to why overnight we have seen the exit of all

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>fact checking on these platforms, Zuckerberg described the system as complex,

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and he said that it was creating too many mistakes. Said,

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>even if they accidentally censor just one percent of posts,

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that is millions of people. Now I'm going to applay

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you a short clip that explains a bit more about

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the thinking behind the decision.

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 3>There's been widespread debate about potential harms from online content.

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Governments and legacy media have pushed to censor more and more.

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 3>So we built a lot of complex systems to moderate content.

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 3>But the problem with complex systems is they make mistakes.

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 3>The fact checkers have just been too politically biased and

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 3>have destroyed more trust than they've created, especially in the US.

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 3>So over the next couple of months, we're going to

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 3>phase in a more comprehensive community notes system.

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 2>So let's play this out right. We're talking about a

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 2>post being reported as missiles disinformation, this third party fact

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 2>checking service looking at it and deciding it was in fact,

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 2>it's then limiting the reach of that And in Mark

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Zackberg's mind, that is then limiting the reach of that post,

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 2>where if the fact checker's got that wrong, it actually

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't have been limited in the first place. And I

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 2>guess it's why that concern is around sense, right.

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I mean, yeah, censorship is really at the

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>heart of the reasoning behind removing these fact checkers. And

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess the way that Mark Zuckerberg sees it is

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>that the people, the fact checkers, who are deciding whether

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>or not something is miss or disinformation, he is claiming

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that they are becoming the arbiters of truth, and that

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Meta itself never wanted to be the arbiter of truth.

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 1>It wanted to be a social media platform, or Facebook

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>at least wanted to be a social media platform where

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>lots of different ideas and social connections could be fostered.

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>And what he's saying is that it has now gone

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>too far and it's now impeding on freedom of speech

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and the principles that underpin that. And to that end,

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Meta has also said it's getting rid of a number

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>of restrictions on topics, so things like immigration, gender identity,

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and gender that have been the subject of frequent political discourse.

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>A statement from Meta said, it's not right that things

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>can be said on TV or on the floor of

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Congress but not on Beta.

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 2>So essentially, Zara, does that mean that people can now

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 2>post anything they want on metal platforms.

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly going to be easier to post what you

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>like and what you think, but it's not going to

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>be a free for all. Instead, the onus is going

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:18.679
<v Speaker 1>to shift from fact checkers to the users themselves. Now,

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>this idea is modeled on the way that X so

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Twitter that's owned by Elon Musk, the way that that

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>platform has treated miss and disinformation, and that's been through

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:32.679
<v Speaker 1>the introduction of something called community notes. Essentially community notes.

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>If you've been on x recently, it's that little thing

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that comes up at the end of a tweet and

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>it says community note so and so xyz is wrong.

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>And the way that this is done is that X

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>users basically fact check each other. Essentially, if two users

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 1>so me and you, okay, if me and you, let's

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>use you you and I, so you and I have

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>previously disagreed on whether the sky is blue.

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 2>I say it's green, you say it's blue.

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And then there's another fact that's posted about whether

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>or not Anthony Albanezi is the Prime Minister, and you

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and I agree on that. That is then going to

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>be published as a community note because previously we've disagreed,

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Now we agree on the same thing. And that is

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the way at least that X. I know it's super confusing,

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>but that's the way that X has said that. It's

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>like prioritizing diverse voices and diverse perspectives. Is that if

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you and I agree on every single thing and we

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>have the same political positions and therefore critique something else

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>as miss or disinformation, you're ending up in the same situation.

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's the way X does it. I hope that

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. I'm not on the back end of X,

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>so look, I can't actually tell you the technology that

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>goes behind it, but essentially what they're trying to say

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>is that that same idea is going to be brought

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in on meta platforms.

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so basically via a lot of complex algorithms. It's

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 2>on users. Now, you're not on these third part the

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 2>TLDs checking services to identify whether something on meta platforms

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 2>is factually wrong correct.

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's the way it's been done on X. And

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you know X has changed, It's completely transformed from the

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>app at once was, so I think that we can

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>expect to see the meta platforms also change quite significantly

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>under this announcement.

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 2>And Zara, we can't ignore the wider context that's happening

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 2>around us, which is the election of Donald Trump for

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 2>a second term. He's being sworn in on the twentieth.

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Meta isn't the only company in the world readying itself

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 2>for a Trump presidency. Can you talk to me about

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 2>how Donald Trump fits into all of this.

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Look, it's an absolutely fascinating one because Mark Zuckerberg

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>explicitly said in his video that he was going to

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>work with President Trump to push back on governments around

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the world pushing to censor more So, there was a

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>very clear nod to the incoming president elect Donald Trump there,

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that you know he is looking to

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>work with him and be on the same side when

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it comes to censorship, I guess as Trump. But what's

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting is that the two absolutely have not always seen

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>eida eye you know, Trump previously threatened to jals Zuckerberg

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>if he did anything quote illegal during the twenty twenty

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>four election, and at a press conference after the announcement,

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump said that this threat was probably responsible for Meta's decision.

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>We can't test the validity of that. We are not inside,

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Meta decision making rooms. But I do

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>think that it's important to, I guess, highlight some of

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the interesting changes that have happened at Meta recently that,

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>as you say, do demonstrate the fact that it is

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>readying itself for a Trump presidency. So two things that

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>were of note. The first is that Dana White, who

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>was the creator of UFC, he was this week appointed

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to Meta's board.

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 2>And he's very close to the Trump camp, right.

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah. He is a full Trump loyalist to the

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>extent that when Donald Trump won the presidency back in November,

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>he was on stage on the night of the election,

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>so very close to the president elect, and that means something.

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>He wrote this kind of explanation of being appointed to

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the board and he said, I don't do boards, but

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to do this board. So a really interesting

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 1>thing there. The second is that the head of Global Affairs,

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>so global affairs is essentially the way that a company

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>connects and engages with government. That person at META was

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:29.959
<v Speaker 1>replaced this week and the new head, his name is

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>George Kaplan, has close ties to Trump and is also

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>understood to have played a significant role in the announcement yesterday.

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:39.839
<v Speaker 2>It's really interesting how Meta is getting ready for this

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Trump presidency. They're not the only company that's doing so,

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 2>as I said, and these decisions are going to impact

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 2>millions of people, not just in America but all the

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 2>way around the world. What has the response been to

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 2>this announcement.

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, I thought I'd focus on the response from the

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>fact checking groups. You know, I said that they were

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in ninety Yeah, there were ninety organizations who were involved

0:10:59.920 --> 0:11:03.199
<v Speaker 1>in fact checking who overnight must have lost huge contracts

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and also, you know, believe truly in their role and

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the value that they can bring. So one of the groups,

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the Pointer Institute, said in a statement that facts are

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>not censorship. They said it's time to quit invoking inflammatory

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and false language in describing the role of journalists and

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>fact checking, not mincing words there. FactCheck dot Org, which

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>has also been used by Meta, said that community notes

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>model will mean that you'll have to do more work

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>on your own when you see questionable posts. I think

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that that's an interesting note to end on, which is,

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, how much critical analysis, how much literacy are

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>we bringing to the online world and to our experience

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>on the online world, because the meta and the Twitter

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of twenty fourteen is very different today, and you know,

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>here in Australia we're heading into an election campaign where

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>we know young voters are going to be met online

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and especially on socials and meta platforms. So understanding how

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 1>this might affect us down the road is definitely to

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on.

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, the onus is kind of now more on us

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 2>than that before. Yep, Zara, thank you. That's a very

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 2>interesting and slightly complex discussion on how fact checking works

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 2>and is evolving into the future. We'll be back again

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 2>with the headlines this afternoon, but until then, have a

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 2>fantastic day, which out to you later. My name is

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Lily Maddon and I'm a proud Arunda Bunjelung Kalkutin woman

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 2>from Gadighl Country. The Daily oz acknowledges that this podcast

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 2>is recorded on the lands of the Gadighl people and

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 2>pays respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island and nations.

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 2>We pay our respects to the first peoples of these countries,

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 2>both past and present.