WEBVTT - The Influencer Cash Ban, The Mesica Twin's Comment Section & Kayla Itsines' Ex Steps Down

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Outspoken. The podcast is not afraid to say

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:06.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you're thinking. Our names are Amy kay and

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Sophie Torba. We're identical triplets, but we often don't have

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>identical opinions, so sometimes things can get heated. Outspoken covers

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>all things reality TV, influencers, entertainment, and issues facing women.

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 2>That is so fatch.

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Hello, and welcome to Outspoken, your dose of

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the hottest influencer and pop culture news twice a week.

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>On today's show, we discussed by You'll be seeing considerably

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>fewer sponsored health products on your Instagram feed, Plus Kayla

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Astinas's x steps down from their fitness empire, and the

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>telltale scigence influencers are paying for their YouTube engagement. But first,

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a post by fast fashion brand White Fox Boutique has

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>us questioning whether some fashion trends have gone past the

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>point of ridiculous. Now. Over the weekend, the Aussie Bass

0:00:57.440 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>brand posted a reel of a model going on what

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>they described as a hot Girl walk and apparently the

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>outfit in question was hot Girl approved by the brand. Now,

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.199
<v Speaker 1>there is definitely a lot to unpack with that caption alone,

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>but shockingly, it was the outfit in question, which caught

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>our attention. So the model was wearing high waisted tights

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and a crop top, which sounds like a pretty normal outfit. However,

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>it was topped off with a matching T shirt that

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>was only pulled down halfway so to paint the picture.

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 1>The T shirt had made its way over the model's head,

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>but was only pulled down halfway over her body, so

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the majority of her crop top and breasts was still exposed.

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>And many women in our community have joked that this

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is what they look like when they're breastfeeding. Well, it

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>actually reminded me on me and girls when they go

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and cut the boobs out of Regina George's singlet and

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>then everyone starts sporting the look to show off their bras,

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and I just didn't get it. I was like, have

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>they actually tucked the T shirt up like that? Or

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>are they selling T shirts with I mean, I will

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>not be buying one of them. Well, it seems that

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>white Fox's followers were also perplexed by this outfit. One wrote,

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>tell me this is not how we're wearing T shirts now.

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Another said sometimes when I eat too much, I also

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>get tired and just write it out Winnar the booster,

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>whilst another said, I think you forgot to pull your

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>shirt down. Surely it's more effort to keep it up

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>like that than it is to wear it normally. I

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>thought it was bad enough that crop tops. You know,

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I've seen all those memes with women of a certain

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>age asking where the rest of their T shirt is,

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and I, for one will be agreeing with this. I mean, okay,

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting crop tops now. I will wear them, and

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>especially with high waisted jeans. However, I will not be

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>showing from my bra right down to my pant line off.

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I I just don't want to do it. The thing

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that I'm just so confused about with this look is

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that it's not even functional as someone as one of

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the commenters said, it's more effort to have this T

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>shirt up by your boobs. It doesn't look particularly comfortable either.

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:56.799
<v Speaker 1>It's also not very sun smart, and I definitely don't

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>think that I will be rocking this outfit. Get is

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>why not just wear the sports bra by itself? Like,

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>what is the purpose of the other material? It doesn't

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>even go past I do wonder what men think about

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>this trend. The thing is, I feel like if you're

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>very fashioned forward. You're actually dressing for other women, not

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>men's approval. So I don't really think men are going

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>to get this trend at all. But I don't think

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that that's why women are wearing this outfit. You can't

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 1>say that this isn't for men. It really plays into

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the male gaze. I mean, the woman hasn't got a

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>T shirt pulled over her bra. Before we move on,

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I just want to go back to the caption because

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I found that whole hot girl approved comment really gross.

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>And I know that when I go on a walk,

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I definitely don't look hot girl approved. I'm usually in

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>really grotty active wear with messy hair, and I don't

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>generally don't give a shit about what I look like.

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, I definitely don't think that I'm the

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>demographic they're going for. But what do you guys think

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>about the whole hot girl approved comment. I'm not a

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>fan of it at all. We've spoken about it on

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the podcast before. And you have to fit into a

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>very niche category in order to be consider a part

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of this hot girl trend, and generally it's someone who

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>is white and thin, and I just think that is

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>totally not inclusive at all and not really a good

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>thing to be pushing.

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh my fucking god. No, I just cut an email

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 2>from Scanlon and Theatore. Oh my god, with Hajamebes fans

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 2>you well. After reading a cv in researching your Instagram,

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 2>teest talk and podcast. We're impressed with your unique sens

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 2>is style, confidence of charisma and your knowledge of fashion.

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 2>We believe you'll be a strong asset to a retail

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 2>team here in the Double Bay store and would love

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 2>to offer you a full time position. If you're interested,

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 2>let's set up a call to discuss your salary. What

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 2>the actual freakin' fuck.

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>The Therapeutic Goods Administrator's new advertising code is set to

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>rock the influencer world. Under the new guidelines, influences can

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>no longer be paid to provide their testimonials when advertising

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>health products. Influencers and brands have until the thirtieth of

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>June to ensure they understand and adhere to the new

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 1>rules now. The Australian first shared this news on the weekend,

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>which has caused a lot of discussion and questions, So

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>we thought we'd do a bit of an explainer before

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>we get into what we think about the rules now. Firstly, Kate,

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>there seems to be some confusion around exactly what this

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:19.359
<v Speaker 1>rule means for influencers. Yeah, so initially it seemed like

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>influencers weren't allowed to advertise certain health products at all,

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but that is not the case. So the new rules

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 1>won't stop influencers from working with health product brands, but

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>they will only be able to speak about the product's

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>approved use and claims, and when they do so, they

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 1>must also clearly label it as advertising. So essentially, these

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>sorts of ads will be very obvious and there's not

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be any issues around influencers making misleading claims

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 1>about the product. Now. What the rule does do, though,

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>is it stops influencers from being paid to provide their

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>personal experience and testimonials on products, and it's important to

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>note that payment includes money, gifts, or other freebies. Now,

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>influencers will be welcome to share their time testimonials, but

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>can only do so if they buy the product themselves

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and gain nothing in return. That is absolutely huge for

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the influencer space because despite the fact that they can

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>still engage with ads if they stick to very much

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a vanilla explainer of what the products are, that's not

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>what consumers want. Consumers look for influencers to provide a

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>review and what they deem to be a genuine testimonial

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of the brand. Obviously, it's not necessarily going to be

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>genuine because there is money exchanging hands, but those sort

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of reviews are at the heart of influencer culture and

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 1>what influencers do. That's what they create their content around.

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>See I personally think that this would have been bigger

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>news back in twenty fourteen when influencers were at the

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>top of their game. People really loved influences, They really

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>took on board what they said, and there was more

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 1>authenticity around these reviews. However, these days, I think people

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>can tell the difference between something that is genuine and

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>something that is paid for, particularly when influencers now have

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to say whether it is or is not an AD

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>when they are talking about products. So while I do

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 1>think yes, this is big news, I do think that

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>there are loopholes where influencers will still be able to

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>sprute products. They just have to very much stay within

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the guide. I feel like people are going to tune

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.559
<v Speaker 1>out even more from that type of advertising though, because

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it just reminds me of the ads you see on

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>TV when you sort of walk out of the room

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>so you don't have to watch them. I feel like

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we're going to tune out even more and it is

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>going to give influences less power. But I do think

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>it is helpful, particularly in the space where it's really

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>important to have the correct messaging going out about health

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and wellness products. I think it is a really positive

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>move because there's so much misinformation in that space and

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it's so dangerous. Yeah. Well, the TGA said that the

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>changes were made because therapeutic goods should be chosen on

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the basis of clinical need and not through the persuasion

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of influencers, and the new code has made it very

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>clear to advertisers of therapeutic goods that they must not

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>engage influence is to provide testimonials. So it's going to

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>be really interesting to see how things go on June thirtieth,

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.239
<v Speaker 1>when this is not allowed again. I think it's important

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to have a look at the products that are covered

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>by the rules, so influencers will not be able to

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>give their testimonials on vitamins, supplements, protein powders, and skin

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>products that make therapeutic claims. So these include acne related

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>products or anti aging products. They also can't give their

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>personal testimonials on skin lightning products, sunscreens, and general health

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>products and medicines. Now, I think it's this whole sunscreen

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>aspect that has got a lot of people upset because I,

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>for one, think that the rules are great, but I

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think that they should apply to suncream. That's so true, Kate,

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>because in the past couple of years, I feel like

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>we've seen this dramatic switch and people have been talking

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>more about sunscreen. We've seen our favorite influencers talking about

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the need to wear sunscreen and making it cool, and

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really sad that we're going to lose

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that because that's one positive thing that influences can provide

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a huge influence over well. Cotney Mangen, who is a

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>sunsafe advocate and has fought melanoma four times, said, I'm

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>extremely disappointed to see that sunscreen was included in the

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>list of products. However, products like tanning accelerators and tanning

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>oils were not. I believe any discussion, paid or unpaid

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>around sunscreen will help save lives, and that's the bottom

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.199
<v Speaker 1>line for me. I do not think that there are

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>any negatives to talking about wearing sunscreen and that it's

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>only positive. There are already so many strict rules around

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>when a company can even make a product that's a sunscreen,

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and then there are already so many guidelines around what

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you can and can't say when you are promoting a

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>sunscreen already, so to make it even more difficult I

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>think will be harmful because people won't be talking about

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>wearing sunscreen as much as they should and we should

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>all be screaming it from the bloody rooftops. She went

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>on to say, if it takes influences getting paid to

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about sunscreen, then I don't care what it takes,

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 1>as long as people are talking about it. And if

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>this therefore means that sunscreen w doon't be promoted and

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>discussed as much, that just breaks my heart because there

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>will be real life consequences for that discussion not happening.

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Courtney has absolutely hit the nail on the head here

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>because the TGA strictly regulates the manufacturing of sunscreen in

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Australia and those rules are amongst the strictest in the world. Okay,

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>some people are saying influencers should promote sunscreen for free.

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 1>But realistically, going forward, you think that this is something

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>they're going to do. While I think there is a

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>moral obligation, I think realistically influencers aren't going to be

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>promoting sunscreen for free. And the thing is, do we

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>expect other big marketing systems like broadcasts to just promote

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>sunscreen brands for free? No, we don't expect that from them,

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>So why are we expecting it from predominantly young women

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>who are trying to make money off the platform. Yeah?

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I disagree there, Kate, because I think at the end

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 1>of the day, influencers, in order for them to be successful,

0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>they also have to sell us a particular type of

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>live style and put out a lot of genuine content

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 1>and share about their lives. So I think that it

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>would be a good branding move for many of them

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to continue promoting sunscreen because as a viewer and a consumer,

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.079
<v Speaker 1>if we know that they're not getting paid to do that,

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>we then buy into a lot more of their messaging.

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't think that's going to realistically happen, though,

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that on influencers are going to be promoting

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>things that they're paid for, and particularly now, that there's

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be some confusion around what exactly they can

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>say about things, And I mean the fact that it's

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be a lot of self reporting, so the

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>general public are going to be dobbing influencers in and

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>then the TGA will review that claim. And I feel

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>like influencers aren't going to want to be aligning their

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>names with sunscreen brands in the case that they may

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:47.719
<v Speaker 1>have been sent one from Free a year ago and

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>someone's going to try and catch them out. I just think,

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>why not make it as easy as possible for influencers

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to promote something so good as sun safety and sunscreen.

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's already so regulated. It sounds like many

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>people within the sunsafe community will be speaking to members

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.359
<v Speaker 1>of the TGA about this move and trying to overrule

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it because it just makes absolutely no sense. Yeah. Well,

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it's quite interesting because another influencer has weighed into the topic,

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and that is Ruby Tuesday Matthews. Now, she said, whilst

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree for the need for more regulations, structure

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and accountability by brands and influencers within these industries, it

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>makes me sad to think how many great small businesses

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and startups This will affect. She went on to say,

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>it also blows my mind that we are targeting health

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and wellness brands encouraging a healthy lifestyle, but not alcohol

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>or junk food. Now, I think it's important to add

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that while Ruby's focus is on small businesses and startups,

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>she does earn money from promoting these type of products.

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>So recently she promoted a functional beauty snack with apparent

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>anti aging properties, as well as superfood brands and cosmaceutical

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>skincare brands. So it does seem to be that she

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is pushing her own agenda slightly here. I mean, while

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I do think she is pushing her own agenda, I

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>do think that there is a concern for many small

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>businesses who do rely on influencer marketing because I don't

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>think that they're going to be selling many products through

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>these revised rules. They are going to be having to

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>pivot and look at other ways to promote their products,

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>potentially through Facebook advertising, Instagram advertising, or public relations. And

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I do really feel for those who have started businesses

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>with influencer marketing very much at the forefront. I mean,

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>there's so many brands that spring to mind that use

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>influencer promotions at the heart of what they do. I mean,

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>think about JS health. I have seen so many influencers

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>sprooking their products. What are they going to do now?

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Are they going to be pushing everyday testimonials? Because they

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>do have a good batch of those, but I do

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>think they need to be propelled further by influencers, Like

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>how do you get those everyday testimonials out to people?

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 1>I suppose it will be a case of Facebook marketing

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and retargeting, but I wonder that's going to have the

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>same effect. Well, what about the influencers, Because many people

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>are questioning what long term effects this ruling will have

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>on influencers careers. What do you think, Kate? Look To

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:13.679
<v Speaker 1>be honest, I think that there is enough wriggle room

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 1>in the rules at the moment that if they stick

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 1>to a script, they are still going to be able

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to earn money for promoting a product. And I don't

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>understand where these brands are going to go elsewhere because

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>they still need to hit these influential people to get

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>their brand out there. Okay, it's not going to be

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>as genuine, but it's still going to be something. And

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I think people already know the influencers promote products. I mean,

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe this could be the start of the influencer industry dying.

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Who knows, But there needs to be something that actually

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>replaces it, and I don't know what that could be

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. There's also been a lot of questions

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>about influencers who run their own business in the health space.

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>So someone like Georgie Stevenson, who runs protein and supplement

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>brand Naked Harvest, is she going to be allowed to

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>promote her own products talk about her own experiences with

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>those products seeing as she has created the brand. Well no,

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>because she's an influencer, like she is going to have

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to stick to the guidelines like everyone else, and there

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>are going to be a lot of people in her boat.

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are so many health and fitness influencers

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that literally all they do is promote supplements and protein powders.

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Sarah's Day comes to mind, and I do

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>wonder if these influencers are going to have to pivot.

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they're going to start wearing a lot more makeup

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>than they used to and do reviews on their makeup

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that they're using. Maybe some of them are going to say, hm,

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I've got to get out of the health of fitness space.

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm going to become a mummy blogger. Like I

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>think that we're going to see a lot of influencers

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>pivoting from what they normally do. What nothing. We haven't

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>done anything if we saw it. No, we haven't been

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>anywhere near your Facebook page. Oh, for fuck's sake, Well

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you've done.

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh you've changed my profile picked to a fat naked

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 2>man and you've changed my status to win is fingering

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 2>his cat.

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>The Mescia Twins' latest YouTube video is attracting a lot

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of attention, not because of its content, but due to

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the comments section. Before we get into it, amy, who

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>are the Mescier Twins. So. The popular social media duo

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is made up of twenty one year olds Olivia and Ashley.

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>The identical twins began garnering a huge following in twenty

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>sixteen when they started sharing their daily lives, beauty, fashion

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and lifestyle advice across Instagram and YouTube. On Instagram, they've

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>amasked a following of six hundred and sixty eight thousand followers.

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>They also have two million followers on TikTok and four

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty six subscribers on YouTube. They also started

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>their own fitness program called Meskier Twin Fit. So so

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it was the comments under their most recent YouTube video

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>which has garnered all the attention. Yeah that's right. Underneath

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the girl's recent video about their adventures in Hawaii, there

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>were comments which really stood out and led to many

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>people questioning whether the girls purchased YouTube comments. So seven

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of the comments underneath the video said ah, that was

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>so esthetically pleasing to watch. I don't even know why.

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I love you guys so much. Hope you have fun now.

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>All seven of those posts also had the same grammar

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 1>because there were no full stop, so they were the

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:13.120
<v Speaker 1>seven identical comments. There were also three comments that all

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:17.360
<v Speaker 1>said ash, your energy is radiating in this video. Love

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>this video, and so grateful we get to follow this

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 1>journey with you. There were also a further seven comments

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that said literally, love you guys so much. Such inspirations now.

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Those with all from different people, so different accounts of

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 1>posting these yes now. The names of those commenting also

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>raised eyebrows because some of the accounts were called Janice

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>fuck me, check my profile, Megan tap me to sex

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>with me, Madeline, I am addicted to sex Madison, fuck

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>me check my profile and the profile pictures accompanying these

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>accounts were also of a pornographic nature, so they look

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>like bot account What do you mean? These could be

0:17:54.680 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 1>genuine messier twin fans about now? I feel like most

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of us are aware that some influencers, particularly micro influencers

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>or those looking to get noticed by brands, will purchase

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>followers and even likes to try and build a name

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>for themselves, but some people will be surprised to find

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>out that this also happens for comments, particularly those on YouTube.

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:20.479
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why people by YouTube comments is to

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>increase their growth, status and engagement levels, while others do

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it to influence the perception of the business or brand.

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>And it is really interesting because YouTube has a number

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of different metrics that it uses to rank videos, and

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 1>engagement is of course one of them. So if many

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>people are finding the content interesting enough on a video,

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 1>they will comment on it, so YouTube sensors that this

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>comment should be seen by more viewers and consequently puts

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it out to more people. Therefore, if a video is

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>receiving a lot of bought comments, that video will be

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 1>favored by YouTube's algorithm. And put out to more people.

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 1>If I was a Mescier Twins, I'd be one a

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>refund because they clearly haven't paid too much money to

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>get these comments with those sort of names attached to

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the profiles. Do you think they selected the comments that

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>they wrote because it sounded like something that I have

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>seen stands writing on other YouTuber's walls. I mean, not

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>seven times, but just the once. Well that's the thing.

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>After doing a little bit of research on the topic,

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I found out that there is actually a difference between

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>purchasing real comments and bot comments. So purchase comments, which

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 1>are apparently real are usually from freelancers, so they are

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>made from humans and are less likely to be identified

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>by YouTube's algorithm, whereas fake comments come from bots and

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>they are usually a bunch of words jumble together which

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>don't really mean much, or just generic things like follow

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>us for this. Yes, but there are many companies online

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>who do sell YouTube comments, so these YouTube comments in question,

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>they were probably not put out obviously by a genuine

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>company that has a high quality service. The other theory

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is that potentially the girls are involved in an engagement pod,

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:05.479
<v Speaker 1>and we have spoken about them on the podcast before.

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>But if you haven't listened. Basically, they are a group

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>of users that come together to like and comment on

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>each other's posts with the purpose of gaining greater reach.

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>So what happens is someone will share a link in

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 1>the group and urge the people in the group to

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>go and like the photo and also comment, and sometimes

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>people will give examples of the sort of comments they'd

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>like users to share. Surely they're not doing that because

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 1>they are so big on social media. Surely someone would screenshop,

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>but also with the account names as well, Like I

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>think it would be more, you know, if it was

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>all of because engagement pods are usually all the people

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 1>are in there for the same reason, they want to

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>become influencers, and they're all sort of the similar demographic.

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>This seems a little bit odd, yea. But the thing

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 1>that is odd is the fact that the comments really

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>relate to the girls. The girls being inspirational includes their name.

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 1>So perhaps they have employed a social media manager or

0:20:56.160 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 1>someone to increase their engagement online, and either the manager

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>has gone and bought very cheap comments, or the manager

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 1>is engaged in one of these weird engagement posit or

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really make sense. I've always thought, what is there

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to stop another arrival? Influencers say, purchasing fake comments for

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:16.239
<v Speaker 1>another one, because all you have to have is the

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>person's username. So someone could go, oh, I want to

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>make the Mesciar Twins look bad, I'm I'm going to

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>purchase some really bad bot comments on their account. Well,

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>another reason that some influencers do purchase comments is not

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to increase engagement, but it's to flood out negative comments.

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>So if someone if an influencer has had a controversy lately,

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and the whole comments section is filled with negative hate

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>field comments, they might not want their advertisers or sponsors

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to see it, so they will pay for a whole

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>load of people to leave glowing reports of how much

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>they love the person and how much their influence by them.

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>So potentially this could have happened here as well. Or

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe they've just got seven Burner accounts and they didn't

0:21:57.520 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 1>tell each other that they were going to be leaving

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the same comment. Well, I felt like if you had

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a Burner account, you probably wouldn't name it fuck me

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and all this sort of probably not She's the least

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>exciting to look at. Toby Pierce has announced he's stepping

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>down from his role as chief executive officer at Sweat,

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the fitness empire he founded alongside ex fiance Kayla Itsinus

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>now Amy. Many people are speculating the move could have

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>something to do with both Toby and Kayla recently finding

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>love with new partners. Yeah, that's right. So so Toby

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 1>went Instagram official with his new girlfriend, fitness influencer Rachel

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Dylan one month ago, and just a few weeks later,

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Kayla announced she was in a relationship with her former

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>best friend Jay Woodroff Now. Toby's decision to step down

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 1>comes less than a year after he and former fiance

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Kayla Estinas sold the business to US software giant i

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Fit Health and Fitness. So in July last year, The

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 1>Australian reported that Toby and Kayla received a fifty to

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty split of proceeds from the sale of Sweat, which

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>was sold for a reported four hundred million dollars. And

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 1>many people remember Sweat was of course known as a

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>bikini body training company previously, which started in twenty thirteen,

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 1>and this is when Kayla and Toby began selling ebooks.

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>So prior to Toby stepping down, there was a lot

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of discussion around whether Toby's relationship with Rachel Dillon could

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>be a conflict of interest, and this is because Rachel

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>also has her own fitness app called Move with Us.

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 1>So Rachel's story is very similar to Kayla's in that

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>she worked as a personal trainer and then launched an ebook.

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Rachel then created her own app and now has over

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 1>forty staff working for her. I'd be embarrassed to say

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>it because I was very oblivious to who Rachel Dylon was,

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>but she actually is worth a reported fifty eight million dollars,

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>so extremely successful in her own right, and it seems

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 1>like she doesn't need Toby's help as she is already

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>such a big success, And from what I've heard around

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the traps in Adelaide, Toby is very much focused on

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>new business ventures because he has already found so much

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>success with sweats, so he may just be stepping down

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to pursue other business opportunities. And I think Rachel would

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 1>be quite protective of her own business, but it just

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 1>isn't the best look at the moment because they do

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>have competing fears app So there is obviously going to

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of speculation, especially in a small town

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>like Adelaide. Yeah, what's a complete conflict of interest? Really? Well,

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 1>I personally think that Toby's announcement has nothing to do

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>with his new relationship, because it's quite clear that these

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 1>relationships have been going on for a lot longer in private.

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Well don't you think as a pr move though, that

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you would then want to announce it well into the future,

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, not like shortly after these relationships have been

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>made public. Well, the thing is, Toby indicated to the

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 1>advertiser that him stepping down was part of the transition

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 1>process to iFIT who have bought out the company, So

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it makes a lot of sense. And he told the

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 1>newspaper that he had agreed to continue to do certain

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>things that set the business up for future success, and

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>he had already achieved those things, which is why he

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 1>was stepping down. So he's going to be replaced as

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 1>chief executive by Adam Kosh, who has been Sweat's chief

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>operating officer for the last three years. But Toby has

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>confirmed he will be staying on as an advisor for

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the company. But do you think that this is all

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:13.959
<v Speaker 1>quite convenient that I fit have stepped in and you know,

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 1>like it's quite it would be very awkward to be

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>working closely with your ex fiance. I mean, they do

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>share a child together, and from all reports they seem

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:25.959
<v Speaker 1>very amicable. But let's not forget that it does create

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>a different dimension when you do add other partners in,

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:33.639
<v Speaker 1>particularly one that has a competing fitness app. I really

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 1>feel like this has a lot to do with Toby's

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>decision to move on from Sweat.

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more so that they decided to try

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and sell the business when they split up. The whole

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>thing is Kayla is the face of Sweat. She can't

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>move on Without her, there is no Sweat, and while

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>they have implemented new trainers, I think that it would

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>be very detrimental if she was to move on as

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.719
<v Speaker 1>the face of that brand. However, Toby is of course

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>in the background, so he can move on. And I

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 1>do recall when they came out with this decision to

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>sell part of the business to I Fit, that it

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>was very clear on the statement that they would be

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 1>staying on in their roles. So I do think it's

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>quite convenient that they're using it as an excuse that

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>iFIT has now bought some of the business. I really

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 1>think that Toby and Rachel must be the real deal though,

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>because the fact that he is willing to leave such

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:27.239
<v Speaker 1>a profitable and lucrative business it says a lot, and

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>they have been doing it long distance for a while.

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Toby is still staying in Adelaide as well, so I

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 1>do wonder if Rachel's going to do a move over

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to Adelaide. The thing is, he's already made his two

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 1>hundred million or so from the business. He was only

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>in that role to help it transition to the new owners.

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>And as you touched on Sophie, he has confirmed that

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>he is staying in Adelaide because there were rumors swirling

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that maybe he was thinking of moving because his Beaumont

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 1>house is up for sale. It goes to auction this week.

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 1>But of course he has just bought a five million

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>dollar penthouse apartment in Adelaide, so it looks like he's

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>staying put now. On the topic of Kayla has seenus,

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I found this very funny because for a long time

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>she has cultivated this social media following without giving too

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>many details about her life. But she is becoming more

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and more transparent with who she is and what she does,

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think a very important part of this was

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>sharing her McDonald's order, because I remember, being someone that

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 1>lives in Adelaide, there are always rumors going around about

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Kayla had seenus, and I remember people being like, oh

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>my god, I saw her eating a boost bar at

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the supermarket and people acting like she's not allowed to

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.199
<v Speaker 1>have any takeaway. So she's confirmed that she does in

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>fact order McDonald's, which I think is fairly obvious, and

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>her go to order is a large McChicken meal with fries,

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a coke, a small caramel Sunday and an apple pie. Refreshing?

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Is this after hearing Sarah's day's McDonald's order of a

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>naked egg McMuffin. Yes, it was rather refreshing. I've got

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to note what are your go to McDonald's orders. We

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>all have the same one. It has to be a

0:27:55.600 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>steamed bun preferably a big macmeal with no meat in

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the burger, and a coke zero. And I've trained Brandon

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 1>to order this for me at the drive through. So

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's all we've got time for today. Thank

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us for another episode, and

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>if you want to join in on the conversation, head

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>over to our Facebook community which has outspoken of the

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 1>podcast community. Also, we'd love it if you could leave

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>us a five star review.