WEBVTT - WHY REALITY TV STARS GET FUSSY ABOUT THEIR EDIT?

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to TV Reload. My name's Benjamin Norris and

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast I'll be going behind the scenes with

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the biggest players in television. On today's episode, I have

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Wiggins, who is a television editor at the top

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of his game, specializing in reality TV. He has worked

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 1>across some of the biggest shows we've ever seen on

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Australian screens. His job is to collaborate with executive producers

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and story producers to make us as the audience, fall

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in love with the heroes, secretly love the villains, but

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>overall to be entertained. I'm so excited to talk about

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>reality TV editing because it is such a complicated job

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:41.840
<v Speaker 1>which often is thankless or underappreciated. But also the editor

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>often falls victim of being blamed by former reality TV

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:48.279
<v Speaker 1>stars when they're not happy with the way they've been portrayed,

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>which we're going to get to the bottom of. Jamie

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>has worked with some of the greats across most production studios,

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>but he's currently full time at Eureka Productions, which has

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>just produced Holy Moly for Channel seven, Amazing Race for

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Channel ten, but also we will soon see a Sydney

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>version of Selling sunsets for Amazon. This guy's a bit

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>of a legend amongst the current creators of television, and

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>i'd like to welcome you to today's guest. It's Jamie Wiggins.

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:17.199
<v Speaker 2>No one really talks about the editor because we are

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 2>just a little man in the shadows.

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>This show, in particular was by far the hardest I

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>have ever ever encountered.

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 2>I've worked on shows before where we do have to

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 2>portray someone as a villain who has a better chance

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 2>at finding a girlfriend. Can edit has an EBB and aflow.

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Holy Moly has arrived and it's got to be a

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of plot.

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 2>I think you just develop your style through nuances housemates.

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>This week, all of you can be nominated for a viction.

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I think if you can watch it and see the editing,

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 2>the editor hasn't done their job very well.

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Good amte How are Yeah?

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm great? How are you? This is good.

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>It's so strange because you never really see the editor.

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know it's strange for us too.

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>So editing is a word which has been come synonymous

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:04.559
<v Speaker 1>with reality television, but we rarely hear from the editor.

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think that is.

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 2>I think it's because we don't really necessarily have a

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 2>very loud voice in television. I mean where editors are

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 2>considered the last scriptwriters in that I show maybe filmed

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 2>one way, we get it into posts, it's edits it

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 2>a different way, so how it was originally shot. So

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 2>I guess like it's hard to put this into words,

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 2>but we are very much part of the production, but

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 2>we're also very much in the shadows. Yeah, we're not

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 2>out with you guys. On the shoots. We get given

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 2>the footage, we edit away vpa away in our little

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 2>edit suites and put out what you see on television.

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I've got this really funny story with a friend of

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 1>mine who was on a different show to me, and

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>she went out one night. She met these group of people,

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>They had a few drinks, they hung out all night.

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>We got to two o'clock in the morning, and she

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>ended up outside I think like the cw to get

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in the cabs. And the guy that she was talking

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to said, oh, by the way, I'm the main editor

0:02:59.160 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 1>on the show that you did.

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and gave.

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>This look of like, oh you're in trouble now. Do

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you think that it's a strange experience when you do

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>get to meet these people face to face one hundred percent.

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 2>It's the weirdest experience because editing these guys, we could

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 2>be editing them for months and months and months, and

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 2>you get to know them so well, if you fall

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 2>in love with them or you dislike them, and you

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 2>feel like you know them so then when they come out,

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 2>it's like seeing an old friend or seeing someone that

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 2>you're really close to and they're just like, have no

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 2>idea who you are. It's bizarre. It's got like a

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 2>strange kind of I don't want to use the word stalker,

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 2>but it's got that kind of feel. Yeah, anyone that's

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 2>not an editor, I'd be like, if you're on someone's

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Instagram page or Facebook page every day and you're looking

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 2>at all their photos and following their story, but they

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 2>have no idea who you are. It's not what editing

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 2>is like. But that's the best example I can give

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 2>of for someone that doesn't know what it's like to

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 2>be an editor.

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Have you been in that situation before where you've met

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>someone after the show and you've been like, what do

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you do? Do you tell them?

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 2>If I saw someone on a promisee that I worked on,

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't tell them, because I think it would raise

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot of questions, like how do I look for

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 2>me personally? If I was on a TV show and

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 2>someone came up to me and said, I edited you,

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 2>my first question would be, how do I look? Am I? Okay?

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 2>And I don't want to get into that kind of

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 2>discussion with somebody.

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to reality television contestants. Let's say I

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>got the bad edit. What's your immediate thought when you

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>hear that.

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a fifty to fifty sort of thing,

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 2>to be honest, because I've worked on shows before where

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:31.039
<v Speaker 2>we do have to portray someone as a villain, but

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 2>it's never going to happen that we have to portray

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 2>someone as a villain that's a very lovely person, But

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 2>you can't make the most beautiful, kind, loving person a villain.

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 2>And when ex reality contestants do say they got a

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 2>bad edit, we're never misconsuing anything that they say. It's

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 2>more nuances of music and nuances of looks and sound effects.

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 2>And okay, I'll give you an example of a cooking

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.359
<v Speaker 2>show I did. I won't name the show, but we

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 2>had contestants that were cast as the villains and they

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 2>ate a meal. They gave so many positive comments about

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 2>the meal, but they gave one negative comment that the

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 2>sauce was too tangy. So what we do in the

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 2>editing if their casts the villain is we leave in

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 2>the source comment take everything else away. So I can

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of understand people may feel that they got a

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 2>bad edit, but I think it's fifty to fifty.

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>You know what. I think it's really funny. I meet

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>people who've been on reality shows and they say I

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>got the bad edit, and I go okay, And while

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>they're defending themselves, I can see in real time them

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>displaying all of the character traits that they say they

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>don't have. Do you think that people these days have

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a really strong disconnect from who they think they are

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>versus how other people see them?

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 2>One hundred percent? I often find myself wondering how I

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.679
<v Speaker 2>would be perceived if I was on one of these shows.

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.239
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm a nice person. I don't think anyone

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 2>thinks they're a horrible person. So when they sit down

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 2>to watch the show that they've been on and they

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 2>come across in a horrible way, I don't blame them

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 2>for thinking that they are ripped off by the edit.

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 2>But we can only cheat reality so much.

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you know if there's a point through the process

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of casting where they all of a sudden go Okay,

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that person's definitely going to be the villain, and then

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>do they hand those notes over to you.

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, every show I've done, whenever I start a new production,

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the productions I've been on lately don't have villains,

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 2>which to me is good because although it's great to

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 2>have villains in a movie or a TV show, like,

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the day, with reality TV, these

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 2>are real people. They're not playing a character, so they

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 2>have to come out and face the music once they

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 2>come out of the house or the jungle or the villa. So,

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 2>going back to your original question, yes, we do. Usually

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 2>on day one of a new show, get told okay,

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 2>this character here they're the villain. But to my understanding,

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 2>those people are usually quite keen on that idea. I

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 2>think it's a weird thing where villains are almost celebrated.

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 2>I call it kind of the like Connor McGregor factor.

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 2>There's likable villains now, the PG villain, yeah, the Disney villain, yeah, exactly.

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 2>There's villains that you kind of are like on side

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 2>with I think the best example of that I can

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 2>give is like an Abby from The Bachelor. To some people,

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 2>she's a villain, but she's a very likable villain. You

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 2>can see that she's got a good heart. Even you,

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 2>to a lesser extent on Big Brother, like you came

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 2>in I think you were almost voted out in the

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 2>first week or something. Yeah, and you were. I think

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 2>you came in and said something like I'm the bitchiest

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 2>person you'll ever meet. But then as the show develops

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 2>and we get to know you, we see that underneath

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 2>that vibrado, there's like a really good, genuine person who

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 2>still has these villainous traits. So to me, like character

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 2>development is really important in TV.

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>It was before goggle Box, but I was goggle boxing

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>people who were in the show thinking what would the

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>viewers think? Yeah, so I was just saying what people

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>were thinking, and sometimes that's villainous.

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think what you said on the first night

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 2>to Michael is normally like that, or you're just apogean.

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>If you keep pigeon all me as Ben Gay, can

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I pigeonhole you as being like a bogan because you've

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>got a weird.

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Hair again, like Australia fell in love with you because yes,

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 2>you had the villainous traits, but you had a good heart.

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 2>And I think if we can portray people in reality

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 2>TV that do have villainous, bitchy, kind of funny traits,

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 2>but genuinely good people, I think that's the best case

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 2>scenario for everyone involved.

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>How does the executive producer involve himself when it comes

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to the editing process. So obviously they're there, you know,

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>creating obstacles for people to jump over, creating storylines with

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 1>a story producer, but how do they involve themselves with you?

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Like are you on set with them? And then do

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you go into the editing room knowing their notes or

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:42.719
<v Speaker 1>are they handing them over to you?

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So the way it works, I'll speak from the

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 2>way it works from shows I've done, but the way

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 2>it works on day one, will get given an episode

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 2>and we work directly with the post producer. So someone

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 2>that goes side by side with us, finds the story

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 2>in the show, edits it down and as we might

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 2>get upwards of fifty hours at footage for a forty

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 2>five minute episode, So you can imagine the process involved

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 2>with that so over a two week period, usually we

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 2>edit that fifty hours let's just say fifty hours for

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 2>argument's sake, down to maybe an hour fifteen, and then

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 2>we have what we call a structural screening, where the

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 2>show won't have all the bells and whistles that you

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 2>see on air, it won't have music, it won't have

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 2>sound effects, but it will just be a story at it.

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 2>So then that's seen by a supervisor who will either

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 2>say yes, do this, no, do that, don't like this story,

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 2>follow this story more. So, then we take those notes

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 2>and go away. And then that's when we start applying

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 2>the bells and whistles and everything like that to sell

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 2>the magic the show. And then two weeks later we

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:50.719
<v Speaker 2>have a screening with an executive producer, which I mean,

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 2>I've been editing for eleven years now, and every screening

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 2>with an executive producer I still get the same. It's like,

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 2>imagine if you did an artwork and a whole bunch

0:09:59.960 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 2>of people came in and disjudged your artwork, and then

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 2>people are saying, No, I don't like red, can you

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 2>change that to blue?

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't like those leads? Can you make them lower?

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 2>Like that's the process. So an executive producer will come

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 2>in give his notes, and then we've got about a

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 2>week to action those notes, and then it usually goes

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 2>off to a network or a streaming service who then

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 2>give their notes. So there's a lot of hoops to

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 2>jump through before the fifty hours I'm given gets to

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 2>a television screen.

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you get really funny about people handing those notes over?

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you get annoyed over time that the same notes

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>come back for you?

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Yes, yes I do. Because the thing with television

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 2>is it's subjective. So like what a supervising producer may

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 2>want may be different to what an executive producer may want,

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 2>which may be different to what the client may want,

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:45.839
<v Speaker 2>and they could be giving you different notes. So you're like,

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 2>but hang on, you told me to take it left

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 2>and right, but now you want me to take it

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 2>up and down. It's a very subjective process. So I

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 2>get frustrated when I find myself going back and forth

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 2>with notes, Like if someone takes me on a bum

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 2>steer in one direction and says, no, why did you

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 2>do that? Go back in this direction. It's basically like

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 2>repainting a picture over and over and over again.

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>You've worked with some of the same executive producers again

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and again, so obviously rehire you. Is there a flavor

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>or a style that they know they're going.

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 2>To get with you. Yeah, I think with ITV, for example,

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 2>with Alex or Ben Olm, I get given more of

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 2>the kind of opening scenes, like the flashier kind of

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm an editor that likes using a lot of sexy

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 2>shots and sexy effects and cool looking drone shots. So

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 2>with me, I think big epic scenes is what I like.

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 2>So like whether that's the start of a new reality

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 2>series or the teas at the front.

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Which is my favorite. By the way. I love the openings.

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I love especially under Celebrity always opens the year. Cannot

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>wait for it because I love the sweeping shots. The

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>drama then creative.

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 2>I love that, and I also love comedy. What you

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 2>touched on there with working with different executives, that's really

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 2>good because I've learned so much from working with people

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 2>like Ben Old and Almavadyakus and Ricky Priust. You know,

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 2>they all have such a wealth of knowledge in television,

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 2>and you learn little bits from all of them, and

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 2>then you just take the bits that apply to you,

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 2>and then I kind of feel like I've been molded

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 2>by these people into what I am.

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>But then think about it. You've been working for eleven

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:19.199
<v Speaker 1>years doing this job, and you know it's in the

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>industry that can be really difficult to maintain employment, but

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you've still kept getting hired on the biggest shows, you know,

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the most amazing shows. Do you have a

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.079
<v Speaker 1>show that you can't say no to that when that

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>comes around again, they go can you come for this?

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 1>You're like, I want to do it.

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I have two that I can't say no to

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 2>that now I do have to say no to because

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 2>I've had a child, one being I'm a celebrity to

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 2>get me out of here. I think you would find

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 2>it very hard to find anybody who works on that

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 2>show that didn't have a blast. The other one is

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Love Island. I think for an editor, those two shows

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 2>are really refreshing to work on because we're very much

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 2>a part of the team in those kind of twenty

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 2>four hour turnaround shows. We're not off in Sydney while

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 2>the show was filmed in Africa where they're with production,

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 2>so it feels like where all one big unit, which

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 2>is refreshing. It's also a refreshing show to edit in

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 2>terms of the way it's almost more real because you

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 2>don't have the time to manipulate stuff as much, so

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 2>we kind of just have to edit it as we

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 2>see it, which is also really exciting. On any other show,

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, you could spend months on the same scene,

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 2>whereas this is one day that's it might not be perfect,

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 2>get it out.

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Are there contestants that are particularly good that stayed in

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>your mind?

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I always like the likable villains, like the like

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 2>a Nash Pollard from MKR, the villains that have good

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 2>hearts but also kind of own their villainness. I also

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 2>really liked on I'm Celebrity. I think it was season eight,

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.079
<v Speaker 2>Angie and Evie. I found them really fun to edit.

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 2>That's got a really good dynamic. And Richard Reid too

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 2>really funds to edit. Yeah, I mean those definitely stick

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 2>in my mind.

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>We often talk about producers wanting to manipulate the cast

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to make a good content for the viewer. But then

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>also I know a lot of these producers they quite

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>often protect the contestants. So what do you hear more

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>often do you hear turn it up or turn it down?

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 2>It depends like if it was a real, genuine moment,

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 2>we definitely lean into it. I think you hear the

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 2>word frank and grabbing a lot where we, you know,

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 2>put words into contestants mouse and I have never, in

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 2>my eleven years of editing, made up something that somebody said.

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I might say, you've never frank and grab.

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 2>I've have frank and grabs one hundred percent. I've frank

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 2>and grabs, but I've frank and grabs in the way

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 2>that I've cleaned up what somebody said, not mis betrayed

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 2>what they said. I'll give you an example. So if

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 2>a contestant said I hate oranges but I love apples,

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 2>we could frank and grab that to say I love apples,

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 2>but I hate oranges. But that would be mis betraying. Yeah,

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 2>fair message. So we don't do that. I know there

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 2>are shows which I won't mention, that do do that.

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 2>But when I frank and grab, I'm more clean up

0:14:57.720 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 2>what somebody said. I'll give you an example. So if

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 2>I said I love Couldie Beach it's my favorite place

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 2>to surf, I could break and grab that to say

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 2>I love surfing at Couldie Beech. Yeah, it just makes

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 2>a cleaner more concise sentence for television. I think everything

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 2>these days is everyone wants everything very snappy, and so

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 2>that's the way we're editing.

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Now. Do you turn away shows because you know that

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>they're more frank and grabby types shows?

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah I do. There are two shows, very popular

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 2>shows which I won't work on just because I know

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 2>that they misbetray people and I just just doesn't sit

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 2>right with me. So, you know, I've got to go

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 2>home and sleep at night. And these people, like I

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 2>said earlier, on these people, they're not characters in a movie.

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 2>They're real people. They have to come out and live

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 2>their lives and face the music after this. So I

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 2>think if you've got people that are happy to be

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 2>the villain, people that are leaning into their villainess, but

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 2>also have the right intention and the good heart, I

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 2>think that's the best outcome.

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>It's so funny though, I from my experience of reality

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>television and from them talking to my other housemates, so

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>many of them said I was portrayed really differently to

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>who I was, and I was like, what. Whan I

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>watched it back, I thought they were portrayed exactly like

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe it was a heightened reality which meant that, you know,

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>certain character traits that they had every day, but the

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>reality was my walk away and my take home was

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that they were pain in the neck and then they

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>go but I wasn't like that, And I'm like, no,

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you weren't like that all the time, but you were

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>like that. So I think what a lot of producers

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>are doing is just encapsulating or heightening the version of

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>who you are.

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly right. You use the right word. They're heightening,

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 2>and that's what we do because that's what we do

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 2>as editors, where storytellers that are trying to, you know,

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 2>tell a clear, concise, but also entertaining story. So if

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 2>someone in the Big brother House was nice for nineteen

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 2>hours of the day but had a really bad moment

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 2>for half an hour, but that half an hour would

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 2>make really good television in a two minute, by what

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 2>part are we going to use? And we heighten things,

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, like I can kind of empathize with reality

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 2>show contestants that say they got a bad edit because

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 2>we heightened, We exaggerate, So someone might have said a

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 2>horrible thing, it doesn't sound that horrible, but when you

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 2>put nasty, menacing music under it, it sounds like they're

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 2>the worst person on planet Earth.

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 1>You would talk about the screenings before, like as in

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 1>the screenings all get together, who attends those screenings, Like

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>who's always present for that?

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So the company I'm at nowt Eureka, we have

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Paul Franklin, we have Ricky Proofs. They're the two kind

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 2>of main EPs that we work with at Eureka. So

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 2>they attend the screenings and they give us approval to

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 2>send off to the client. And usually network television, you

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 2>do have a screening with the client in the room.

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 2>When I say the client, I mean Channel seven, ten, nine,

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Tannel ten, Netflix, Amazon, stand they're the client. Usually what

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 2>happens is we have a screening with the executives of

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 2>that particular company, so Eureka, they give us the approval

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 2>to show their product to the network. Basically what they're

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 2>selling to the network, so they need to have confidence

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 2>in it, if that makes sense, So they're going to

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 2>give their notes, their feedback. They want to make sure

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 2>that they're representing the company in a good way before

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 2>we then show the network.

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>What happens if the show is finished editing, like is

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>now we're pre recording stuff or we're editing a whole series,

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>or whether they're waiting until the audience can give an

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>idea as to what's working. Does shows ever which are

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 1>doing as well have a reformat to.

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Them very very rarely, because a show takes about six

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 2>weeks from start to finish, to edit and then before

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 2>it gets approved to go to air. Usually, once a

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 2>show is on air, that time is gone because a

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 2>show's rarely on for longer than six weeks. So no,

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't say if a show's rating badly, would they

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 2>pull us all editors back to re edit every episode. Also,

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 2>by that stage, the audience has kind of made up

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 2>their mind too, Like if a show's tanking, it's very

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 2>hard for that show to come back from that. Like

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 2>once you know, once you go from a million to

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 2>seven hundred thousand to four hundred thousand to three hundred thousand,

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 2>it's very hard to get back up to a million.

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 2>I think it's I don't think it's ever happened in

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 2>my career. I'd say what they do do is maybe

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 2>change the way the show's promoted. So if it's a

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.199
<v Speaker 2>show that you know, the network really backed and has

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of babe in, they might promote it a

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 2>different way or promoted more heavily, you know, with sponsored

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 2>ads on Facebook, on Instagram, and they might change their

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 2>advertisements on TV. I'm not saying it's never happened, but

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 2>in my eleven years as an editor, I've never been

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.160
<v Speaker 2>pulled to remake a show because it's not doing well.

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>It's funny that you hear those stories, though, because you're like,

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>oh my god. It's if they would imagine editing that

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>whole series and.

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Being like, you know, holy Moly, Holy Molly.

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 1>For instance, you know Holy Molly was like that, you

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't go you finished Holy Molly, it's locked away. Imagine

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 1>if they came back and they said, it'll be like

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>re scrambling a jigsaw puzzible.

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 2>It's yeah, and it's not. It's never going to be

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 2>worth it too, because there's a lot of money involved

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 2>in that and it doesn't guarantee you a result. I

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 2>feel like, if an audience has made up their mind

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 2>that they're not watching a show, you can change it

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 2>and make it the best show ever made and they're

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 2>not going to watch it.

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>You worked on the Voice, which I think is is

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>such a great brand here in Australia. You know, we're

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 1>I've seeing so many seasons of that now. You know,

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to watching the music artist, I mean

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>these artists get up. There is there ways in which

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 1>you can emote the performance to make sure that the

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>audience doesn't fall too deeply in love with a contestant

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that the coaches won't turn around for No.

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 2>I think with the Voice, we want you to barrack

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 2>for every person that walks onto that stage, because that

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 2>takes a lot of guts. I mean I definitely couldn't.

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 2>I can't see them, but if I could sing, I

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't do it. So I think you'll find with the

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Voice it's a very feel good, warming show. So before

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 2>any contestant or artist walks onto that stage, we have

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 2>a backstory, and they're never a backstory on Love Island

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 2>or on Big Brother. We're going to portray someone as

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 2>something they're always it's a barrack for that person they

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 2>always have, you know, we get the oh, not another

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 2>sad story. But you want to feel for these people.

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 2>So when they do hit that amazing note, or they

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 2>do turn the chairs or they don't turn the chairs,

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 2>you really feel something for them and that's what makes

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 2>good television. I think my name's Jack James.

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>When I was fourteen ends up winning show. There's got talent.

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>I went from being just some kid to fame and

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 1>money and everything. Somewhere along the line, I.

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Just fell out of love. It's mission as clicked completely.

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 2>I just felt alone and at rock bottom. I think

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 2>if you can barrack for somebody, or you can feel

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 2>for someone, or you're with them on the journey, that's

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 2>what makes good television.

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 1>How do you turn around those sixty seconds getting to

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>know you clips? The how do those get made?

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Usually there's a really long interview that we watch through thoroughly. Basically,

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 2>we try to print that person in the most concise

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 2>short way possible.

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>When you're watching a stream of audio or a stream

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of visual audio, can you mark it straight away and go,

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what it is. That's what it is.

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So we have this is boring editor talk, but

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 2>we have a thing called located. It's on our edit

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 2>suites where anytime a contestant has said something that we

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 2>want to use, we just mark it down like a

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 2>red dot or a blue dot, and we come back

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 2>to those and that's how we do our cutdown. So

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 2>say one of the contestants is a farmer from the outback.

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, has an amazing voice, but he's been through

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 2>years of drought. They are all the headlines that we want.

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 2>We want that he's been through the drought, he's struggled,

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 2>and now he's here to like improve his life. I

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 2>think all farmers have a lot of hope. Your hope

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 2>is going to rain again.

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>You hope you'll fall in love and that you live

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>happily ever after.

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 2>What's the point of life if you can't have some love.

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 2>So that's the story that we will tell in that

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 2>sixty seconds. And how long does it take to get

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.479
<v Speaker 2>that it It depends on the person. If they've got

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 2>a very clear, easy story, it can take a day.

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 2>But if they've got a story where you know, there

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 2>are hip hop artists that skateboards, that's man died that

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:28.640
<v Speaker 2>likes walking dogs, it's like, okay, which one of these

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 2>do we follow? You want to be able to print

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 2>someone really quickly because in a backstory you can't tell everything.

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 2>You can tell the headlines and then you let the

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 2>audience at home get to know these people in a

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 2>more authentic way.

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I love them let's still go back and watch different

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>seasons of it. A lot of the reality shows just

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to watch the buyer videos of people, because once you've

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>known them and once you've watched the series, it's so

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to go back as you go, Yeah, that's sixty

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 1>seconds really did tell a story that continued for another

0:23:58.920 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>three months.

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 2>YE was going to ask you, when you go back

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 2>and watch those bio packages, are they accurate?

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Always?

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I've ever seen by a video that

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.360
<v Speaker 1>is completely out ofwapp Yeah. I think that they're so accurate,

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think that they're so telling, and I think

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>it's fascinating to one pack. You know, getting the humor

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 1>right on Holy Moly that has been a really interesting

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>journey because you know, Australians could be quite funny with

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>our humor and what we find funny, and that show

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 1>has been wildly successful in America, and then you're bringing

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>this kind of best in show style of humor to

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Holy Moly. Is it an easier or a harder show

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to try and insert humor in something like that.

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we really changed. I don't think we

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 2>really changed the way we've made Holy Moly from America

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 2>to Australia. I think we tried it with exactly the

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 2>same comedy timing from Rob, so our brief wasn't different.

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:01.120
<v Speaker 2>It's just feel like Rob's humor doesn't necessarily land as

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 2>well in Australia as it does in America. And I

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 2>can't put my finger on why. I think maybe it's

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 2>because he's American and Australians want to see fellow Australians

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:12.640
<v Speaker 2>on TV. I can't put my finger on it. I mean,

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm a massive fan of the show. I love working

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 2>on Holy Moly, I think it's hilarious. So when I

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 2>read things online that, oh, this is so unfunny, this

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 2>is crude, this is all this, this is horrible, it

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 2>genuinely surprises me because I think it's fantastic.

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I think what's really funny is these shows that people

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.679
<v Speaker 1>write online about. People write about I'm a celebrity, Oh

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 1>they're not famous. Julia Morris is not funny, Doctor Chris

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Brown's a bit weird. All of these things that most

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>people are commenting online don't necessarily reflect the viewers, the

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>people that truly love those shows. Yeah, so it's really

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>fascinating and it's really hard to turn yourself off. Do

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you turn yourself away from reading comments about the programs

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>you work on?

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Ah? I should, because I find it definitely does bum

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 2>me out. Like when Holly Moly the first episode aired,

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.400
<v Speaker 2>I was on Twitter all night reading the comments, and

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 2>with every negative comment, I've just felt my soul being

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:06.120
<v Speaker 2>destroyed because I was so excited when I first worked

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 2>on Holy Moly USA and I couldn't wait to show

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 2>my Australian friends and family. And then when it's come

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 2>here and you know it's done okay, but it hasn't

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 2>been received as well as I would have hoped. So yeah,

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.479
<v Speaker 2>reading negative comments about something that you've spent huge amounts

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 2>of hours crafting, putting your sweat and blood and love

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 2>into it is pretty soul destroying. So yes, I think

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 2>my wife was angry at me for being on my

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 2>phone all night on Holy Moly launch night, But I

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 2>should turn away. And I think it's probably the same

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 2>with reality show contestants when they come out and they

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 2>start reading horrible things people have to say about them.

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Don't read the comments section.

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah to people, Yeah exactly.

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>You know what's funny? I had my phone take really

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to sort of digest the way in which we

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>are taking upon people's feedback being our critics, and I

0:26:55.359 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>would say, whose opinion seems to cut deeper for you? Really?

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Is it people you know, like your mate saying I

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>don't like Holly Molly? Or is it faceless people online?

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>That's a great question because we know who should matter.

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but it's not the truth. I think I've been

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.120
<v Speaker 2>lucky with the people I surround myself with that I've

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 2>never really had anyone tell me I don't like this.

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 2>I've certainly worked on shows that you know my mum,

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 2>and I wouldn't expect my mum or my family to

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 2>watch I think, weirdly enough, the comments online are what

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 2>affects me the most because they're not in any way biased.

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 2>That's who we're making the show for, the people that

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 2>we never see.

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>What about your wife, folk, I mean, does she Do

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you think she's being honest with you about the shows

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that you work on, or do you think she senses herself?

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 2>I'd say she senses herself. She's a very beautiful, kind

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 2>hearted person. And if I do something that she may

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 2>not like, she's certainly never told me something I do.

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 2>It's terrible If she said she didn't like some I

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 2>don't know like I would if it's somebody I can

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 2>have a dialogue with and ask, okay, why I think

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:05.919
<v Speaker 2>that's I think that's probably sorry, That's probably what it is.

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 2>It's probably that I with the people online. There's so

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 2>many times where I've typed something back and then erase

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 2>the race to race, to race, the race. And if

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Rachel and my beautiful wife said I don't like this show,

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 2>I would be able to say, oh, okay, why, how

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 2>could it be different? I'd be able to have that feedback.

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 2>I'd be able to understand what the issue is. A

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 2>lot of the negative comments about Holy Moley online is

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 2>that it's not funny. I don't have that opportunity to

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 2>say people to say to the people making those comments, Okay,

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 2>how would you like? What would be funny to you?

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 2>How would you do it differently? It's not that you

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:39.719
<v Speaker 2>can please everybody, but it would just be nice to

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 2>know why. I mean, if I could be critical about

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 2>one thing for Australian Holy Moley versus USA Holy Miley,

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 2>would be duration. But I know that's a discussion way

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 2>above me, way above my pay creap. That comes down

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 2>to money. And what's financially viable for the network. But

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 2>I think the USA one is a much snappier forty

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 2>two minute You get your gags in show, whereas I

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 2>think a ninety minute may just be a bit too

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 2>long and everything stripped now because we were talking about

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 2>that with David Mott last last week and he was saying,

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, we stripped the content. You know, we're stripping

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 2>things out longer. I think Holy Molly would be a

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 2>once a week thing. I one hundred percent agree, I think,

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 2>And that's how it is in America. In America, it's

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 2>a summer show once a week for forty two minutes.

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 2>So ideally, with that, you get people at the end

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 2>of the episode going, oh, I want more, because that's

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 2>what we want. We want people. If you think about

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 2>any Netflix show or stand show that you've watched that

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 2>you binge, it's because you're left wanting more. And if

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 2>we could leave people wanting more and putting in their

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 2>calendar on next Wednesday, Holy Molly's on, I think that's

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 2>the way I would do it.

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of the things I ask people every

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>single time to finish TV reload is what's a funny

0:29:57.400 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>story that you tell when you're sitting around with you

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.959
<v Speaker 1>and family, like the dinner room conversation. Yep, what's your

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>go to story from being an editor working in.

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Round Yeah, Okay, there's lots of little micro stories that

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I tell, so, like you know, being an editor for

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 2>eleven years, I've worked in a jungle where I come

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 2>into my edit sweet ones to find a curled up

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 2>snake on my mousepad. I've had bad burns robbed me

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 2>in Africa. So I've got lots of little micro stories.

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 2>But I think the one that sticks in my mind

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 2>the most was when I was very young in my

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 2>career as an editor. We worked very tight deadlines as

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 2>an editor, and I was desperate to prove myself being

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 2>young in the industry because it's quite cutthroat. You know,

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 2>you constantly need to prove your work. And anyway, there

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 2>was one night where I had a screening with the

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 2>executive the next morning, and so I worked really really late.

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 2>At this time, I was driving from the Central Coast

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 2>to Sydney to work, so about an hour and a

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 2>half each way. Anyway, I had a screening the next

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 2>morning and I got a whole bunch of notes from

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 2>my supervisor that afternoon to action before the screening, because

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 2>I was like to be here all night doing these notes.

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 2>So what ended up doing was I did all the notes.

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 2>I finished them at about two o'clock in the morning.

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 2>I was way too tired to drive back to the

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Central Coast and then drive back, which would have been

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 2>three hours of driving in about a six hour period.

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 2>So what I did was I slept at work on

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 2>the floor and I thought I'll be okay because the

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 2>cleaner's come in at seven o'clock in the morning and

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 2>they'll wake me up and then I'll freshen up and

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 2>be ready for the screening. Of course, that day, the

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 2>cleaners didn't come in, so I was woken up by

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 2>the executive and the team coming in for my screening.

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 2>While I didn't have pants on, so I had my

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 2>box of shorts on. I had to get myself. It

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 2>could have been. I think they were very kind to me.

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I think they know that I worked really hard, But

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 2>for a fleeting moment that was the most embarrassing moment

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 2>of my life with a senior team coming into a

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 2>junior editors edit suite where he'd been sleeping and in

0:31:56.120 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 2>your shamboled in my undies. So that's my.

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Story then, is that when you decided to move and

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>live closer to the studio.

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I think it'd been coming. Like I

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 2>think I knew I needed to move closer. I thought, Yeah,

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 2>that's definitely the straw that broke the camel's back with

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 2>that one.

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, I just want to say congratulations. I think you

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>have done so amazingly well to craft this career, but

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>also you know, to keep getting highed, to keep coming

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>back to being able to do what you truly feel

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>passionate about, and that is telling stories. And I think

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people out there that it'd be

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to hear what you've been able to share today.

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>So thank you so

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Much, thank you, and thanks for having me on