1
00:00:00,560 --> 00:00:03,800
Speaker 1: Already and this is the daily This is.

2
00:00:03,720 --> 00:00:06,880
Speaker 2: The Daily ohs oh, now it makes sense.

3
00:00:14,800 --> 00:00:17,480
Speaker 1: Good morning and welcome to the Daily OS. It's Wednesday,

4
00:00:17,520 --> 00:00:21,520
Speaker 1: the fourteenth of August. I'm zara, i'm emma wa. Senator

5
00:00:21,600 --> 00:00:25,079
Speaker 1: Linda Reynolds is suing former Liberal staff for Britney Higgins

6
00:00:25,160 --> 00:00:28,960
Speaker 1: for defamation. Now. It's the latest in a very long

7
00:00:29,000 --> 00:00:32,400
Speaker 1: string of lawsuits that have been unfolding since Higgins first

8
00:00:32,440 --> 00:00:36,320
Speaker 1: came out publicly with allegations against her former colleague Bruce Lherman.

9
00:00:37,080 --> 00:00:39,519
Speaker 1: In today's deep Dive, we're going to explain why a

10
00:00:39,600 --> 00:00:42,720
Speaker 1: senator is suing her former staffa the case has heard

11
00:00:42,800 --> 00:00:45,800
Speaker 1: so far, and what could happen next. But first, m

12
00:00:45,920 --> 00:00:47,000
Speaker 1: what's making headlines.

13
00:00:51,760 --> 00:00:55,720
Speaker 2: Wage growth has outpaced inflation rising prices for the third

14
00:00:55,880 --> 00:00:59,880
Speaker 2: consecutive quarter, according to new national data. The latest Wage

15
00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:03,480
Speaker 2: Price Index from the Australian Bureau of Statistics shows annual

16
00:01:03,520 --> 00:01:06,280
Speaker 2: wages grew by four point one percent over the year

17
00:01:06,319 --> 00:01:09,240
Speaker 2: to June, ahead of the current rate of inflation, which

18
00:01:09,280 --> 00:01:13,080
Speaker 2: is three point eight percent. This suggests more Australians are

19
00:01:13,120 --> 00:01:16,000
Speaker 2: seeing an increase in their real wage, which is how

20
00:01:16,080 --> 00:01:19,920
Speaker 2: much their pay has increased compared to rising prices, but

21
00:01:20,160 --> 00:01:22,880
Speaker 2: wage growth is predicted to slow over the next year

22
00:01:22,920 --> 00:01:26,800
Speaker 2: as the government and Reserve Bank continue efforts to lower inflation.

23
00:01:27,360 --> 00:01:30,120
Speaker 2: Wages for workers in the private sector row zero point

24
00:01:30,240 --> 00:01:33,360
Speaker 2: seven percent in the three months to June, the equal

25
00:01:33,480 --> 00:01:40,040
Speaker 2: lowest quarterly rise for the sector since December twenty twenty one.

26
00:01:40,160 --> 00:01:44,320
Speaker 1: The federal government will introduce legislation aimed at strengthening Robodet

27
00:01:44,360 --> 00:01:48,880
Speaker 1: investigations and holding current and former public service leaders to account.

28
00:01:49,520 --> 00:01:53,120
Speaker 1: Robodet was an unlawful automated debt collection system that was

29
00:01:53,160 --> 00:01:57,080
Speaker 1: designed to recover funds from welfare recipients. Under a government

30
00:01:57,120 --> 00:02:00,840
Speaker 1: proposal announced this week, the Australian Public Service Commissioner would

31
00:02:00,880 --> 00:02:05,400
Speaker 1: be given additional powers to investigate senior officials involved in robodet.

32
00:02:05,920 --> 00:02:08,760
Speaker 1: Public Service Minister Katie Gallahas said the bill will give

33
00:02:08,840 --> 00:02:12,919
Speaker 1: the Commissioner unambiguous power to investigate former agency heads.

34
00:02:15,880 --> 00:02:19,400
Speaker 2: The Court of Arbitration for Sport won't consider new evidence

35
00:02:19,440 --> 00:02:23,520
Speaker 2: relating to an Olympic bronze medal dispute. USA Gymnastics has

36
00:02:23,600 --> 00:02:27,920
Speaker 2: announced US gymnast Jordan Chiles originally placed fifth in the

37
00:02:27,960 --> 00:02:30,560
Speaker 2: women's floor final, but her score was revised up to

38
00:02:30,760 --> 00:02:34,079
Speaker 2: third after her coach appealed it. The Court of Arbitration

39
00:02:34,240 --> 00:02:37,480
Speaker 2: and Independent Global body ruled in favor of a complaint

40
00:02:37,480 --> 00:02:41,760
Speaker 2: from two Romanian gymnasts, who argued the appeal was submitted

41
00:02:41,840 --> 00:02:46,639
Speaker 2: outside the required time frame. USA Gymnastics submitted video evidence

42
00:02:46,760 --> 00:02:50,280
Speaker 2: urging the court to reconsider, but the CIS has refused

43
00:02:50,400 --> 00:02:53,520
Speaker 2: to do so. US officials said they would pursue every

44
00:02:53,600 --> 00:02:57,200
Speaker 2: possible avenue and appeal process to let Chiles keep her medal.

45
00:02:57,560 --> 00:03:01,040
Speaker 2: This could include appealing to the Swiss Federal Tribunal, where

46
00:03:01,080 --> 00:03:02,640
Speaker 2: the cas IS based.

47
00:03:05,639 --> 00:03:08,840
Speaker 1: And today's good news. In a first of its kind discovery,

48
00:03:09,000 --> 00:03:12,760
Speaker 1: scientists have found water on the surface of Mars, bringing

49
00:03:12,800 --> 00:03:15,920
Speaker 1: them a step closer to understanding the planet's past. A

50
00:03:15,960 --> 00:03:19,280
Speaker 1: pocket of liquid with large volumes of water was found

51
00:03:19,360 --> 00:03:22,200
Speaker 1: up to twenty kilometers deep in the rocky outer crust

52
00:03:22,240 --> 00:03:24,360
Speaker 1: of the planet, where it's believed to have been for

53
00:03:24,400 --> 00:03:28,560
Speaker 1: more than three billion years. Scientists have found water on

54
00:03:28,600 --> 00:03:31,440
Speaker 1: Mars before, but it was previously in a frozen or

55
00:03:31,520 --> 00:03:37,120
Speaker 1: vapor state. Just a quick heads up that this deep

56
00:03:37,160 --> 00:03:40,760
Speaker 1: dive does deal with matters including sexual violence, so if

57
00:03:40,760 --> 00:03:42,520
Speaker 1: you're not in the right head frame to listen to

58
00:03:42,560 --> 00:03:46,400
Speaker 1: this today, feel free to jump back on tomorrow now.

59
00:03:46,400 --> 00:03:49,640
Speaker 1: And we have spoken many times about Britney Higgins on

60
00:03:49,680 --> 00:03:54,240
Speaker 1: this podcast before. Those episodes were mostly around at first

61
00:03:54,280 --> 00:03:57,520
Speaker 1: the criminal case against Bruce Lherman that was later dropped,

62
00:03:57,840 --> 00:04:02,160
Speaker 1: and then Lehman's defamation case against Network ten that he lost.

63
00:04:02,800 --> 00:04:05,440
Speaker 1: But today we're talking about a different case, and that

64
00:04:05,640 --> 00:04:08,320
Speaker 1: is because a new case has been brought by WA

65
00:04:08,400 --> 00:04:12,480
Speaker 1: Senator Linda Reynolds. Linda Reynolds is suing her former staff

66
00:04:12,480 --> 00:04:14,040
Speaker 1: for Britney Higgins for defamation.

67
00:04:14,640 --> 00:04:18,119
Speaker 2: All right, so lots to unpack there, and I think

68
00:04:18,240 --> 00:04:21,599
Speaker 2: off the bat Worth acknowledging that this is a really

69
00:04:21,640 --> 00:04:24,919
Speaker 2: complicated one. So before we talk about this latest case,

70
00:04:25,240 --> 00:04:27,080
Speaker 2: for the sake of all of us who might be

71
00:04:27,120 --> 00:04:29,599
Speaker 2: feeling a little bit lost, can you run us through

72
00:04:29,839 --> 00:04:32,320
Speaker 2: some of the background and how we got here.

73
00:04:32,680 --> 00:04:36,600
Speaker 1: Yes. So, in twenty twenty one, Britney Higgins publicly alleged

74
00:04:36,680 --> 00:04:39,120
Speaker 1: that she had been raped by at that point an

75
00:04:39,200 --> 00:04:43,400
Speaker 1: unnamed co worker in Parliament House. That coworker turned out

76
00:04:43,440 --> 00:04:46,960
Speaker 1: to be Bruce Lherman, and Lhman's criminal trial later failed

77
00:04:47,040 --> 00:04:51,440
Speaker 1: due to dura misconduct. A retrial was eventually abandoned due

78
00:04:51,480 --> 00:04:54,719
Speaker 1: to concerns about Higgins's mental health. So that was the

79
00:04:54,839 --> 00:04:57,880
Speaker 1: criminal elements of the case that was kind of put

80
00:04:57,920 --> 00:05:01,240
Speaker 1: on hold, never really to be revisited. But then you

81
00:05:01,320 --> 00:05:04,880
Speaker 1: might remember more recently that Lehman launched a defamation case

82
00:05:04,920 --> 00:05:07,360
Speaker 1: in the federal court. So this was a civil case.

83
00:05:07,839 --> 00:05:10,520
Speaker 1: He was claiming that he was identifiable in the initial

84
00:05:10,520 --> 00:05:14,240
Speaker 1: coverage of Higgins's allegation, so he was suggesting that he

85
00:05:14,320 --> 00:05:15,960
Speaker 1: had been defamed.

86
00:05:15,720 --> 00:05:19,040
Speaker 2: And that was in a series of interviews with Higgins

87
00:05:19,120 --> 00:05:20,720
Speaker 2: relating to the allegations.

88
00:05:20,920 --> 00:05:23,600
Speaker 1: It was and that was a really long case. There

89
00:05:23,600 --> 00:05:26,200
Speaker 1: were many twists and turns. I think we did two

90
00:05:26,279 --> 00:05:29,360
Speaker 1: or three episodes on it. Ultimately, the judge in that

91
00:05:29,440 --> 00:05:32,120
Speaker 1: civil case found that it was more likely than not

92
00:05:32,360 --> 00:05:34,880
Speaker 1: and that's the threshold that had to be met that

93
00:05:35,000 --> 00:05:39,720
Speaker 1: Lehman raped Higgins, and therefore Lehman lost that case. You

94
00:05:39,800 --> 00:05:42,279
Speaker 1: might remember Justice Lee, who was presiding over the case.

95
00:05:42,400 --> 00:05:45,320
Speaker 1: He told Lerman that having escaped the lions Den, he

96
00:05:45,400 --> 00:05:47,680
Speaker 1: made the mistake of going back for his hat. That's

97
00:05:47,720 --> 00:05:51,000
Speaker 1: the case. Just to jog people's memory. Lehman, who maintains

98
00:05:51,040 --> 00:05:54,680
Speaker 1: his innocence, has since lodged an appeal. So criminal case

99
00:05:54,720 --> 00:05:57,680
Speaker 1: they weren't continuing civil case. There was an outcome, but

100
00:05:57,720 --> 00:06:01,239
Speaker 1: Bruce Lherman is now appealing. Now we have another case.

101
00:06:01,680 --> 00:06:06,800
Speaker 2: Okay, So that civil defamation case wrapped in April, or

102
00:06:07,080 --> 00:06:10,479
Speaker 2: for now wrapped in April, and I think many of

103
00:06:10,560 --> 00:06:12,680
Speaker 2: us might have presumed that that was going to be

104
00:06:12,880 --> 00:06:15,320
Speaker 2: the last time this story would be in the headlines.

105
00:06:15,360 --> 00:06:19,640
Speaker 2: As you mentioned, the criminal proceedings were abandoned, the defamation

106
00:06:19,880 --> 00:06:23,200
Speaker 2: case seemed to have been wrapped up. But now this

107
00:06:23,279 --> 00:06:27,080
Speaker 2: story has taken another turn. We have a third player

108
00:06:27,360 --> 00:06:29,880
Speaker 2: entering the story. At this point, YE talk to me

109
00:06:30,040 --> 00:06:32,559
Speaker 2: about Linda Reynolds and this case.

110
00:06:33,120 --> 00:06:35,560
Speaker 1: Yeah, So, as I said at the top, Linda Reynolds

111
00:06:35,600 --> 00:06:39,160
Speaker 1: is suing Britney Higgins for defamation and that's over some

112
00:06:39,200 --> 00:06:41,800
Speaker 1: of Higgins's social media posts, and we'll go into what

113
00:06:41,839 --> 00:06:44,400
Speaker 1: those posts are a little later, but before we do,

114
00:06:44,480 --> 00:06:47,159
Speaker 1: I think that it's just a very important context to

115
00:06:47,279 --> 00:06:51,080
Speaker 1: explain the relationship between the two women, because I had

116
00:06:51,120 --> 00:06:55,320
Speaker 1: almost forgotten Linda Reynolds was the boss of Britney Higgins

117
00:06:55,360 --> 00:06:58,920
Speaker 1: when Higgins alleges that she was raped. Importantly, it was

118
00:06:58,960 --> 00:07:03,120
Speaker 1: also in Linda Reynolds's office that Britney Higgins alleges that

119
00:07:03,240 --> 00:07:04,359
Speaker 1: the rape occurred.

120
00:07:04,839 --> 00:07:08,360
Speaker 2: After Britney Higgins went public with those allegations, I remember

121
00:07:08,400 --> 00:07:12,760
Speaker 2: there being criticism about Reynold's handling of the alleged incident

122
00:07:12,880 --> 00:07:17,520
Speaker 2: at the time, particularly Higgins criticizing Reynolds in a few

123
00:07:17,560 --> 00:07:21,440
Speaker 2: social media posts. Ye does that tie into these proceedings?

124
00:07:21,520 --> 00:07:24,680
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. So those are the social media posts that

125
00:07:24,760 --> 00:07:28,400
Speaker 1: Reynolds is basing this defamation case on. So there are

126
00:07:28,440 --> 00:07:30,520
Speaker 1: a number of posts, and I'm not going to kind

127
00:07:30,520 --> 00:07:32,760
Speaker 1: of read them word for word, but essentially at a

128
00:07:32,800 --> 00:07:35,560
Speaker 1: high level. In one of those posts, Higgins alleged that

129
00:07:35,600 --> 00:07:39,680
Speaker 1: Reynolds continues to harass her through the media. In another one,

130
00:07:39,840 --> 00:07:43,080
Speaker 1: which was an Instagram story, Higgins shared an article that

131
00:07:43,120 --> 00:07:46,080
Speaker 1: had been written about Reynolds and added text on top

132
00:07:46,120 --> 00:07:48,960
Speaker 1: of it on the Instagram story that said, instead of

133
00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:51,200
Speaker 1: solving the problem, there are people who would prefer to

134
00:07:51,280 --> 00:07:52,760
Speaker 1: just silence victims.

135
00:07:53,280 --> 00:07:57,200
Speaker 2: Okay, So with that in mind, Linda Reynolds is then

136
00:07:57,320 --> 00:08:01,280
Speaker 2: arguing that these social media posts have tarnished her reputation.

137
00:08:01,440 --> 00:08:02,160
Speaker 2: Is that the crux of.

138
00:08:02,160 --> 00:08:05,280
Speaker 1: It exactly, That's the essence of what a defamation case is.

139
00:08:05,360 --> 00:08:08,000
Speaker 1: And so this trial has now begun it's before the

140
00:08:08,080 --> 00:08:11,320
Speaker 1: WA Supreme Court at the moment. I will just add

141
00:08:11,360 --> 00:08:13,640
Speaker 1: that there were attempts to settle it out of court,

142
00:08:13,680 --> 00:08:15,760
Speaker 1: but all of those attempts failed, so it's made its

143
00:08:15,760 --> 00:08:19,960
Speaker 1: way into court. After Luhman's failed defamation case in April,

144
00:08:20,040 --> 00:08:23,520
Speaker 1: Higgins did issue a statement apologizing to Reynolds. It said,

145
00:08:23,840 --> 00:08:26,000
Speaker 1: I hope we can resolve our differences with a better

146
00:08:26,120 --> 00:08:30,680
Speaker 1: understanding of each other's experience. However, Reynolds didn't back down.

147
00:08:30,920 --> 00:08:32,920
Speaker 1: She said at the time that she was continuing with

148
00:08:32,960 --> 00:08:34,960
Speaker 1: a legal challenge to clear her name.

149
00:08:35,480 --> 00:08:38,800
Speaker 2: Also, probably worth flagging here that Linda Reynolds is a

150
00:08:38,840 --> 00:08:42,280
Speaker 2: federal senator, so in her capacity as Britney Higgins boss

151
00:08:42,280 --> 00:08:44,960
Speaker 2: when Higgins was a Liberal staffer, we're talking about Linda

152
00:08:45,000 --> 00:08:47,800
Speaker 2: Reynolds being a senator. Reynolds has indicated she will not

153
00:08:47,880 --> 00:08:50,560
Speaker 2: seek re election yet next year, so she will be

154
00:08:50,559 --> 00:08:53,000
Speaker 2: stepping away from politics in the near future.

155
00:08:53,240 --> 00:08:53,680
Speaker 1: Correct.

156
00:08:53,960 --> 00:08:56,600
Speaker 2: This case has been going on for a little while

157
00:08:56,679 --> 00:09:00,200
Speaker 2: now in the WA Supreme Court. As you mentioned, what

158
00:09:00,280 --> 00:09:03,280
Speaker 2: have we heard from Linda Reynolds and her lawyers? What

159
00:09:03,440 --> 00:09:04,440
Speaker 2: have they been arguing?

160
00:09:04,840 --> 00:09:07,240
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, there's been a lot to be frank and

161
00:09:07,600 --> 00:09:11,320
Speaker 1: I think that sometimes in the reporting of not just

162
00:09:11,440 --> 00:09:14,040
Speaker 1: this defamation case, but the two other cases that have

163
00:09:14,120 --> 00:09:17,000
Speaker 1: come before it, there has been a tendency to cover

164
00:09:17,160 --> 00:09:19,920
Speaker 1: every single detail, and I think that that says actually

165
00:09:19,920 --> 00:09:22,000
Speaker 1: to confuse a bit, So I do just want to

166
00:09:22,120 --> 00:09:25,720
Speaker 1: keep it really high level here. Essentially, Reynolds's case is

167
00:09:25,800 --> 00:09:28,800
Speaker 1: predicated on this idea that she believes the Britney Higgins

168
00:09:28,880 --> 00:09:31,960
Speaker 1: and her now husband David Scharraz had a plan to

169
00:09:32,000 --> 00:09:35,760
Speaker 1: publicly bring down Linda Reynolds and the government that she

170
00:09:36,080 --> 00:09:38,560
Speaker 1: was a part of, and she's saying that these social

171
00:09:38,559 --> 00:09:42,520
Speaker 1: media posts really just built that narrative. Reynolds has expressed

172
00:09:42,559 --> 00:09:44,600
Speaker 1: to the court that she, and I'm going to quote here,

173
00:09:44,960 --> 00:09:47,559
Speaker 1: felt like one of those punching clowns at the fairground.

174
00:09:47,679 --> 00:09:50,040
Speaker 1: You get punched down and punched down again, and you

175
00:09:50,120 --> 00:09:53,200
Speaker 1: have to get up smiling. The court heard that Reynolds's

176
00:09:53,200 --> 00:09:57,840
Speaker 1: health deteriorated quite dramatically after Britney Higgins's allegations were first

177
00:09:58,040 --> 00:10:00,959
Speaker 1: made public. She said that she was in pain from

178
00:10:00,960 --> 00:10:03,760
Speaker 1: a heart condition, she wasn't sleeping, and that at one

179
00:10:03,800 --> 00:10:05,920
Speaker 1: point she had to leave the Senate chamber she was

180
00:10:05,960 --> 00:10:10,319
Speaker 1: having a breakdown and sobbing uncontrollably. She was then hospitalized

181
00:10:10,480 --> 00:10:13,319
Speaker 1: and this was reported at the time. She then proceeded

182
00:10:13,320 --> 00:10:16,800
Speaker 1: to take three weeks away from her job. She said

183
00:10:16,800 --> 00:10:19,319
Speaker 1: that she has put her house on the line, everything

184
00:10:19,400 --> 00:10:22,280
Speaker 1: she's worked for forty years, putting everything on the line

185
00:10:22,320 --> 00:10:24,920
Speaker 1: to be able to be here and tell the truth.

186
00:10:25,000 --> 00:10:28,680
Speaker 1: So she is really here, suggesting that the effect of

187
00:10:28,920 --> 00:10:32,640
Speaker 1: Britney Higgins's allegations about the way that she handled the

188
00:10:32,720 --> 00:10:36,760
Speaker 1: situation had really seeped into all parts of her life,

189
00:10:36,800 --> 00:10:40,000
Speaker 1: not just her professional life. We had also heard from

190
00:10:40,120 --> 00:10:42,840
Speaker 1: Reynolds's partner who testified in the case. He said, the

191
00:10:42,840 --> 00:10:46,320
Speaker 1: whole saga has had an immeasurable impact on Linda, on myself,

192
00:10:46,400 --> 00:10:48,440
Speaker 1: It's affected every part of our life.

193
00:10:48,840 --> 00:10:53,600
Speaker 2: And so central to Reynolds's case then is this idea

194
00:10:53,720 --> 00:10:57,800
Speaker 2: that the saga has impacted her physically, mentally, in every

195
00:10:57,840 --> 00:11:01,680
Speaker 2: aspect of her life. And also this es that Higgins

196
00:11:01,800 --> 00:11:05,600
Speaker 2: and Schiraz had a calculated plan to bring her down

197
00:11:05,920 --> 00:11:10,560
Speaker 2: to damage her reputation exactly. And I saw headlines yesterday

198
00:11:10,600 --> 00:11:14,480
Speaker 2: about former Prime Minister Scott Morrison and this case. What

199
00:11:14,640 --> 00:11:15,240
Speaker 2: was that about?

200
00:11:15,559 --> 00:11:19,560
Speaker 1: Yeah, So yesterday former PM Scott Morrison was asked to

201
00:11:19,600 --> 00:11:22,680
Speaker 1: give evidence in this case. So he testified, and he

202
00:11:22,720 --> 00:11:26,000
Speaker 1: appeared via videolink, and he told the court that he

203
00:11:26,080 --> 00:11:29,120
Speaker 1: believed that he had witnessed the quote weaponizing of the

204
00:11:29,160 --> 00:11:33,440
Speaker 1: issue for political purposes to discredit Senator Reynolds, the government

205
00:11:33,480 --> 00:11:37,360
Speaker 1: and by extension myself. Very strong language there from the

206
00:11:37,440 --> 00:11:38,880
Speaker 1: former Prime Minister.

207
00:11:38,760 --> 00:11:42,320
Speaker 2: Who was of course leader at the time of the alleged.

208
00:11:42,000 --> 00:11:45,160
Speaker 1: Rape exactly, and this was something that really ended up

209
00:11:45,200 --> 00:11:48,880
Speaker 1: defining his prime ministership and in some ways really determining

210
00:11:49,000 --> 00:11:52,360
Speaker 1: the election. And so when he was asked about when

211
00:11:52,400 --> 00:11:55,679
Speaker 1: he found out about Higgins's allegations, which again was this

212
00:11:55,840 --> 00:11:59,319
Speaker 1: really big point in the process, he said to the court,

213
00:11:59,360 --> 00:12:03,120
Speaker 1: and I'm quoting here, as events transpired, Senator Reynolds chose

214
00:12:03,160 --> 00:12:05,520
Speaker 1: not to tell me out of respect for the confidence

215
00:12:05,559 --> 00:12:08,720
Speaker 1: that she had entered with miss Higgins. He also told

216
00:12:08,720 --> 00:12:11,920
Speaker 1: the court that Reynolds couldn't continue in her defense portfolio

217
00:12:12,080 --> 00:12:14,959
Speaker 1: because of health concerns, and that those health concerns were

218
00:12:14,960 --> 00:12:19,120
Speaker 1: related to the allegations and the fallout that followed. He said,

219
00:12:19,120 --> 00:12:22,040
Speaker 1: in reference to her cardiac condition. For a period there,

220
00:12:22,080 --> 00:12:24,360
Speaker 1: we were very concerned that this could be a fatal

221
00:12:24,400 --> 00:12:27,680
Speaker 1: outcome for her there he's referring to Senator Reynolds.

222
00:12:28,000 --> 00:12:33,000
Speaker 2: So some quite strong evidence from Scott Morrison. So we've

223
00:12:33,000 --> 00:12:35,760
Speaker 2: spoken about Linda Reynolds and why she has brought this

224
00:12:35,880 --> 00:12:40,240
Speaker 2: case against Britney Higgins, but what about higgins defense, How

225
00:12:40,280 --> 00:12:43,280
Speaker 2: has she responded and what have her legal team said.

226
00:12:43,559 --> 00:12:47,120
Speaker 1: Yes, so Britney Higgins as lawyers are partly relying on

227
00:12:47,160 --> 00:12:50,720
Speaker 1: the truth defense, and the truth defense is essentially that

228
00:12:50,840 --> 00:12:53,480
Speaker 1: you can't defame someone if the content of what you're

229
00:12:53,520 --> 00:12:57,400
Speaker 1: saying is true. So essentially, in this case, it will

230
00:12:57,440 --> 00:13:02,719
Speaker 1: require lawyers to prove higgins comments were substantially true, including

231
00:13:02,880 --> 00:13:06,920
Speaker 1: that Linda Reynolds failed to provide adequate support or harassed her.

232
00:13:07,679 --> 00:13:10,240
Speaker 2: And so we've seen an example of this kind of

233
00:13:10,320 --> 00:13:14,199
Speaker 2: defense play out with the Lerman defamation case exactly, so

234
00:13:14,280 --> 00:13:17,200
Speaker 2: that he claimed he had been defamed, but that Network

235
00:13:17,240 --> 00:13:21,080
Speaker 2: ten argued he hadn't been defamed because the comments in

236
00:13:21,200 --> 00:13:24,280
Speaker 2: question were true. That they argued that he had raped

237
00:13:24,280 --> 00:13:27,880
Speaker 2: Britney Higgins and therefore aligning him with that offense was

238
00:13:27,920 --> 00:13:28,760
Speaker 2: not defamatory.

239
00:13:29,160 --> 00:13:32,440
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, And so that's what Higgins as lawyers are

240
00:13:32,480 --> 00:13:35,200
Speaker 1: in part trying to do here, suggesting that Linda Reynolds

241
00:13:35,280 --> 00:13:38,439
Speaker 1: was not supportive had continued to engage in a certain

242
00:13:38,440 --> 00:13:41,840
Speaker 1: way with Higgins and her partner. But Britney Higgins hasn't

243
00:13:41,880 --> 00:13:45,080
Speaker 1: had the opportunity yet to give evidence that is coming

244
00:13:45,200 --> 00:13:47,560
Speaker 1: later this month, so we haven't heard directly from her

245
00:13:47,880 --> 00:13:50,400
Speaker 1: in this case. One of her lawyers did say to

246
00:13:50,440 --> 00:13:54,199
Speaker 1: the court though, that the defamation proceedings are retraumatizing her

247
00:13:54,720 --> 00:13:58,960
Speaker 1: and there has been some conversation about whether a case

248
00:13:59,120 --> 00:14:03,600
Speaker 1: like this should be pursued by a senator against her

249
00:14:03,679 --> 00:14:06,960
Speaker 1: former staffer. And you know, both women have come under

250
00:14:07,160 --> 00:14:10,720
Speaker 1: significant financial stress as a result of this.

251
00:14:10,840 --> 00:14:16,760
Speaker 2: And we also know significant emotional distress based on Reynold's hospitalization, Higgins'

252
00:14:16,800 --> 00:14:20,720
Speaker 2: own hospitalization and her personal struggles that she has detailed.

253
00:14:21,200 --> 00:14:24,080
Speaker 2: So it certainly doesn't feel like there are really any

254
00:14:24,120 --> 00:14:27,240
Speaker 2: winners in this one, But we know that Britney Higgins

255
00:14:27,320 --> 00:14:30,600
Speaker 2: is expected to give evidence later this month. Proceedings are

256
00:14:30,640 --> 00:14:35,120
Speaker 2: expected to continue to September, and then who knows how

257
00:14:35,160 --> 00:14:37,840
Speaker 2: long a judgment could take before we get a final

258
00:14:37,880 --> 00:14:40,960
Speaker 2: decision on this. Regardless, we will stay across it and

259
00:14:41,000 --> 00:14:43,640
Speaker 2: keep you updated on the daily ODS. Thank you so

260
00:14:43,760 --> 00:14:46,440
Speaker 2: much for listening to today's episode of The Daily Ods.

261
00:14:46,560 --> 00:14:48,920
Speaker 2: If this one brought up any issues for you, you

262
00:14:48,960 --> 00:14:52,440
Speaker 2: can contact one eight hundred. Respect will pop some links

263
00:14:52,600 --> 00:14:56,040
Speaker 2: to further resources in our show notes. We'll be back

264
00:14:56,080 --> 00:15:00,120
Speaker 2: with another episode tomorrow. Until then, have a great day.

265
00:15:01,720 --> 00:15:04,040
Speaker 1: My name is Lily Maddon and I'm a proud Arunda

266
00:15:04,280 --> 00:15:09,080
Speaker 1: Bugelung Calcoton woman from Gadighl Country. The Daily oz acknowledges

267
00:15:09,120 --> 00:15:11,320
Speaker 1: that this podcast is recorded on the lands of the

268
00:15:11,320 --> 00:15:14,960
Speaker 1: Gadighl people and pays respect to all Aboriginal and torrest

269
00:15:15,000 --> 00:15:17,800
Speaker 1: Rate island and nations. We pay our respects to the

270
00:15:17,840 --> 00:15:20,600
Speaker 1: first peoples of these countries, both past and present.