WEBVTT - "We Want Privacy"

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to Outspoken. It's your dose of the

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>hottest influencer and pop culture news twice a week. I'm

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Sophie Torba and coming up on today's show, Josh Miller's

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>bizarre ads campaign with Sun Harvey sparks backlash, Influencer Integrity

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>is in the spotlight, as Sarah's Day parts ways with

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a long standing sponsor, and Our Friday Debrief. But first,

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Sophie Kasha has surprised her followers by announcing the arrival

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of her baby girl. She first broke the news on

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>her Instagram story, sharing a polaroid of her kids, Bobby

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and Flossy meeting the baby for the first time. Underneath it,

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>she simply wrote the date, which was the twenty eighth

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of January. She followed it up by sharing a very

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>cute video of her breaking the news to her sisters

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>via FaceTime. And she was supposed to be at her

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>sister's birthday celebrations, but she went into labor, so she

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>said it was an early birthday present for the Aunties.

0:00:55.760 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's throw to the clip. Oh my god, what I

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>look at that? Immy? As well? Is mum really not

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing my Mum's actually saying you could tell that they

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>knew something was up. Now. A day later, Sophie revealed

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the name and also released a carousel of black and

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.479
<v Speaker 1>white images from the hospital, and some of the photos

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>appeared to be taken during Sophie's labor, which showed Sophie

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and her new girlfriend, Mattie kissing, and also Maddie hugging

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Flossy following the baby's arrival. I think that speaks volumes.

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>It shows how much involvement Mattie is hoping to have

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in this child's life, and I think it cements how

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>strong their relationship is. I mean, last week we spoke

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>about that Q and A that Sophie and Maddie put out.

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>M Yeah, the photos are really beautiful, and I think

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it shows the connection that Maddie already has with Sophie's kids.

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I've been really curious to see what name Sophie would choose,

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and that is because she created headlines when she gave

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>birth to her daughter, Florence a number of years ago,

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>because Florence was originally called Betty Margaret, and two weeks later,

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Sophie admitted that she wasn't sure about the name, so

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>she changed it to Florence Betty instead. A lot of

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.399
<v Speaker 1>celebrities do this, remember Kylie Jennef. Do you think it's

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>because influences and celebrities feel this pressure to announce it

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to their audience straight away. So some parents will actually

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>take a couple of weeks until they officially announce a name.

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:34.519
<v Speaker 1>But because they have currency and there's prominence in announcing

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the birth quickly, they might jump to a decision. They're

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>not entirely happy. You do have to make a decision

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>quite quickly because you need to put it on the

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>birth certificate. I just think it's a case where this

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>happens more than you realize. I think a lot of

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>people often have a name in mind for their child,

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>but then when the child comes out, they're like, wait

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a second, this kid does not look like a Betty.

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Like it just doesn't work. I fear that that will

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>be me. I always change my mind in the side.

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>You're the sort of person you always buy something from

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the shops and we be the best thing ever, and

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>then two weeks later you're like, I'm not wearing it.

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Car't despise So I'd never get a tattoo because I

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.359
<v Speaker 1>would change my mind. Now we have been holding off

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 1>on this name. The name is esmey Sophie Sure. All

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 1>I can think of was the brand as May. When

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I saw this announcement, someone did put this in our

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>group and a lot of people jumped to Sophie's defense,

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>saying this is a beautiful French name and it's not

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>fair too. I mean, I think this listener made a

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:31.399
<v Speaker 1>joke saying, oh, she clearly wants a sponsorship with ESME.

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that's the least of what she's thinking now.

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh but I mean it's It's always a bonus, isn't it. Yeah,

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>just for an influencer again, esme sponsorship. Yeah, well, she

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>wrote on Instagram, Esme Sophie Sure joined our world on

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the twenty eighth of Jan at five point fifty eight,

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>watched on by her amazing big brother and sister. My

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>dream experience to have them there and now diving deep

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>into my love bubble. And I really like that she's

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>given her second daughter her name as the middle name

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Pille because she has decided to do this on her own.

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a really special decision. Do you think

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>she's going to be going back to her maiden name

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of Shaw. I feel like. Legally she probably is known

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>as Sophie Shaw, but Sophie Kaisha is almost like her

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>stage name, particularly because her pajama name is called Kasha Pajamas.

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 1>It'd be very confusing if she changed her Instagram handle over.

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if Sarah's day is spewing, because I know

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 1>often we joke about the fact that Sarah might have

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a fourth baby. She said she's only wants three, but

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>we know that she does want a daughter, and she

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 1>does have a thing for naming her kids after brands,

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and she has a long running alignment with esme Maybe

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 1>that was her baby girl's name. Well, she's definitely not

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 1>going to call her future daughter Esmee now because she

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>likes to be unique, and this name has now been taken.

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>What is it? I wor we got for Brecky. Look

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>at that babe, Everything we need for a poor some breakfast.

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>A paid ads campaign created by staf Claire Smith's husband

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Josh Miller for Uber Eats is generating attention online, but

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>for all the wrong reasons. While the TikTok video promoting

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Uber Eats's new Kid's breakfast box garnered over one point

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>four million views, comments had to be disabled as followers

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 1>were distracted by the couple's comical attempts to conceal their

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>son's face throughout the ad, leading many into question if

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 1>privacy is paramount, why include their three year old in

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>brand deals at all? Now? So, can you bring us

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>up to speed about the couple's backflip on privacy. Yeah, Well,

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>late last year, Steph and her husband Josh spoke in

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 1>depth about their decision to no longer show their son

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:42.799
<v Speaker 1>Harvey's face online. And this decision came after he started

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.799
<v Speaker 1>to be recognized in public even when he wasn't out

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>with his famous parents, so he was approached by fans

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 1>whilst he was on a childcare excursion and also when

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.919
<v Speaker 1>he was out with different family members. That would be

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>really scary as both a parent and also for Harvey

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to have complete strangers come out up talking to you.

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's obviously a safety concern. Well, in this case,

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 1>luckily it was just fans of Steph who approached Harvey

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to say hello, But it did open Josh and Steph's

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>eyes to the fact that people with not so good

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>intentions could also approach Harvey, and their decision to start

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>concealing Harvey's face was really big for the couple because

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Harvey regularly featured on both of his parents' social media accounts,

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I think it was really jarring when

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Steph and Josh started sharing these videos of Harvey where

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>he had a big emoji over his face or it

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>was pixelated, especially considering old content of Harvey still remained

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>on Steph's social media account. I think a lot of

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 1>people were confused because they thought, oh, step and Josh

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>are just going to stop sharing Harvey altogether, but they

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>their idea was, no, we're still going to share him,

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>but we're just going to pixelate his image, and they

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>also still share about him as if he's a main character.

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I know recently Steph has been sharing sort of chronicles

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of his sleeping patterns and how she keeps getting woken

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>up in the middle of the night, and it is

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>something that a lot of parents relate to. But it's

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>an interesting move when you are wanting to have a

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>level of privacy for your son, but then you're still

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>sharing intimate details about their tantrums or what different milestones

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>they're in now. Steph did explain at the time that

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>she wouldn't be removing old content of Harvey, but going forward,

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>they would no longer share his face because his facial

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>features were becoming more recognizable. Well, I can totally understand

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>why Steph and joshuad want to stop sharing Harvey's face,

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people applauded their decision to do so.

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is why a lot of followers were surprised

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>this week to see Josh accept a sponsorship deal with

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Uber Eats, which featured Harvey heavily in the video. Now,

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the ad was promoting Uber Eats's new kids breakfast boxes

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and it showed Josh and Harvey unboxing all of the

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>ingredients and cooking up the omelet together. And I have

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to say this video was very creatively shot, because I'll

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>give it to the couple. They stuck to their guns

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't include Harvey's face in the video. So

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>many of the shots of Josh and Harvey cooking were

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>filmed from overhead, from behind. They even used the Uber

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Eats box and a vase of flowers to conceal his face,

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>which I have to admit I burst out laughing when

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that's scene popped up. Look, I get what they're trying

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to do, but it's getting to the point, as you said,

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>where it's just comical. You will almost looked like he

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>was part of some witness protection program because it showed

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Harvey also playing with a toy that came in the

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>breakfast box, and every time he spun around, it would

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>cut to a new different shot of him to conceal

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>his face. Again, I understand what they're doing. I commend

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>them for doing it, but it just doesn't make sense

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>if you want to keep your son's life private, why

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you would include him in sponsorship deals. And this video

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>elicited a huge response, so it quickly gained over one

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>point four million views, probably because all the comments were like,

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>what the fuck is going on in this video? The

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>last I was gonna say, you might think, oh, uber

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Eats would be stoked with it, but it quickly became

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>apparent that a lot of followers were amused and distracted

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>by the level that the couple went to to hide

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>his face, and many also questioned why Josh and Steph

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>don't just keep their son off social media if they

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>want to maintain his privacy. Well, I would have liked

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to have seen the reaction from the brand manager at

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>uber EA's getting this ad because if it was me,

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I would have said, guys like, very creative, but this

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>is so distracting. It completely takes away from the messaging,

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>like the marketing messaging of uber e. But going into

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that campaign, the manager would have full well known that

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 1>they didn't feel comfortable to show their son's face, so

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 1>they probably agreed on this. I mean, there are some

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>brand managers who were only keen on the stats, so

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>for them they would have been like, wow, this was

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a win. We had one point four million views, we

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>had one hundred and eighty three cent. But they did

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>have to turn the comments on because it got out

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of hand with people being like, what the fuck is

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>going on here? This is ridiculous. I mean that speaks

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>volumes the fact that the comments were turned off. It

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of when Queensland influencer Courtney Mangnan and she's

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a business owner of course as well friend of the

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>podcast Yes, when she spoke about a video which went

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>viral on TikTok of her So she had mentioned toblarone

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the chocolate, but she had called it toblarone, which is

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>how my mother in law pronounced. I've heard a few

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>people say toblerone, but most people will say toblerone, and

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the whole comment section was just field of people being like, oh,

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>it's toblerone. But she said that, Yes, this video got

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 1>over a million views, but it didn't actually translate to

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>anybody going over really to follow her page, and it

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't really reach the people that would be interested in

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>her content. So I would argue that this has happened

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 1>with this video of Josh and his son. Yeah, it's

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>got one point four million views, but are these parents

0:10:57.400 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 1>who are wanting to buy this uber eats box or

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>are these people just poking fun at them? Yeah, you

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>would think that the success of an ad like this

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>would be pinned on actually seeing the excitement on the

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>child's face that you know, their reaction to the box.

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm surprised that uber eats would have agreed to

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>these terms. I want to share a few comments from

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>our Facebook community in response to this video. So One

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>listener wrote, I understand them not wanting to show the child,

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>but continuing to post the child daily and covering his

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>face is just silly to me. Just keep him off

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>social media entirely. Another said, so keen on their kids

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>privacy that is, until the right brand deal comes along,

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>whilst another said, imagine showing the child this ad down

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the road and trying to explain to him Mum and

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Dad needed the cash, but we didn't show your face

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>this time. At least if I was him at that point,

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd be asking for the money. Do you think they

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>put it aside for him? Well, on the topic of money,

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the first thing that sprung to mind was does Josh

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>really need the funds from this ad? Because it's pretty

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>well known how successful the couple is. I mean, Steph

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>was on the afr's Rich List. Yeah, it said that

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 1>her net worth was forty two million dollars, which it's

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>incredibly inspirational. The fact that she has been able to

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>grow her business, keep it cleaner, it's remarkable what she's done. Yeah,

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>So it just makes you think, I mean, I don't

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>know how much uber EAT's paid for this ad, but

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's worth it, especially because of

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the backlash as well, with so many people commenting it's

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:29.199
<v Speaker 1>very contradictory. You don't want to show your child off

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>on social media, but then it looks as if you're

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>prepared to actually use him in adverts. To make money. Yeah,

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing that people can't get their head around

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>is why Harvey is still a permanent fixture on their

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>social media accounts. And the reason I think this is

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>for Steph is because she still wants to maintain a

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>certain positioning in the family space. For her, sharing about

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 1>being a mum comes naturally to her because she's had

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>her Instagram account for what like fifteen years, shares about

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>every facet of her life, and I think for her

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it would feel suddenly unnatural to stop talking about one

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest areas of your life. And I think

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>for her being a mum adds a certain level of

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>relatability with her audience. Unfortunately, they need to make a decision.

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to continue to conceal his face or

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>are we sharing about him? You can't have you caked

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>either wall. We think it'll be interesting to see the

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 1>approach that they take when Steph gives birth to their

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>second child this year. It's interesting to look at Josh

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and why he may be the one pushing to do

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>these advertisements with Harvey, Because for Josh, over the past

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, he has built quite a name for

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>himself as a daddy influencer. So Josh is Harvey's primary

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:40.959
<v Speaker 1>care and he has been staying at home with him

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>for most of Harvey's life. And on TikTok he markets

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>himself as a dadfluencer, so in his bio it says

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>just a dad doing his best. And in all of

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>his videos he uses hashtags like dads of TikTok, Kids

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 1>of TikTok, and toddlers of TikTok. And he has three

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>videos currently in to the top of his page and

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>his most viewed video has eighteen million views, and it

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>shows Harvey his face front and center, playing pictionary. Now,

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the other pin videos show Josh making coffee with Harvey

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>again his face is visible and teaching Harvey matters. On

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>his TikTok, all of the videos with Harvey, his face

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>is front and center. Well, that's really how Josh's TikTok

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>grew because he used to share such cute content of

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>him making Harvey baby chee. They're very wholesome content. I

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>can see why it's gone on. And Harvey has appeared

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in countless paid ads for Josh. The majority of Josh's

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>videos are paid partnerships and he's done very well with them,

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>like I was shocked to see how many of these

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>videos had millions of views, and I think it's because

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>we are crying out for daddy influences. And it's quite

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting because when you look at some of the partners

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that Josh and Harvey have worked with, they're pretty prominent

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>partners like just Jean's, Omo, Sunglasses, Heart and Cadbury, and

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>these videos have wrapped up massive views. So it's clear

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that this was lucrative for Josh in a way, for

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>him to contribute financially to the family because he is

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the soul at home care. And as you touched on, Amy,

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of discussion and a lot of

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>judgment on how much money does this couple need, and

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it is a very valid question, particularly when

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you are taking a stance on your son's privacy. But

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that being said, maybe it is important for Josh to

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like he's contributing financially and this is his creative

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>outlet and the way that he's doing so, and maybe

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>he feels like it's okay because he is hiding Harvey's face.

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I just think they're going to have to make a

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>decision one way or another moving forward, because I don't

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>think brands are going to be coming forward seeing this

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>type of example video and going, yeah, we want to

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>pay you for a video where your son's head is

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>behind a bunch of flowers. Well, that's the thing I saw.

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>He recently did an ad for the Australian Open and

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it only got a couple of hundred views. It seems

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>like the ads that perform really well are the father

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>son ads. So I think that they just need to

0:15:57.480 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>think about what their stance is on their son's privacy.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, are these videos really worth it? Are we

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>going to cop unnecessarily attention or flak over this. If

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you've been following my vlogs and my inst stories, you'll

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>be familiar with my pink drink. I have it every

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>single morning before breakfast, before I ingest anything, and everyone

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>has been asking what it is. I've been like putting

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>sneaky clues out there. A debate about influencer integrity has

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>broken out in our Facebook community after one list of

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>pointed out that fitness influencer Sarah's Day no longer uses

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>her daily body bloom powder since parting ways with long

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>standing partner Trapeka a year ago. The revelation came about

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>when a follower asked, Sarah, do you still take your

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>body Bloom every morning? Sarah replied, I'm currently just taking

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>my probiotics. Tripeka and I went our separate ways over

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a year ago. Unfortunately, I can't say more than that,

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and she put two crying face emojis. That led another

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>follower to chime in, writing, how has your digestion been

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>since stopping body Bloom? I remember you swore by it

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>for your morning movements, Sarah. Sarah replied saying all good,

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>because now I'm on two different probotics for Harlow's reflux,

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>So my whole protocol now is really about him and

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with me, mum life at its core.

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>That's really a way of her answering the question but

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 1>not really addressing the issue, because I take from that, well, actually,

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you could have just been taking a few probotics rather

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>than my very expensive body Bloom for the last couple

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of years. Yeah. Now, this split from Trepeka has been

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big deal for Sarah because she has been

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>working with them for over eight years, and I think

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>for Sarah, at the core of her success as and

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>influencer has really been the fact that she doesn't just

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>work with anyone and everyone. She's really known for aligning

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.360
<v Speaker 1>herself with key sponsors who actually make sense to her

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>brand and who she can have a long standing relationship with.

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't just flog any old shit. Yeah, she's not

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>just doing the teeth whitening ads. Yeah. And it's products

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that you, as a consumer, you totally believe that she

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>actually uses. And when she was pregnant with her first child, Fox,

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>six years ago, that's when she actually launched body Bloom

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>through Trapeka, And at the time, she was very hands

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>on and she helped create the pink powder, which supposedly

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>provides support for healthy skin, nails, and hair and apparently

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>keeps you very regular with your movements. And I have

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to say she really integrated this powder into her morning routine.

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>It would feature a lot in her Instagram stories and

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>her vlogs. You truly believed that she was invested in

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>this product. Well, you forget that it was an ad

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>because as you said, she would do it every morning,

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>So it genuinely seems like this is a product she uses,

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>this is part of her routine. You kind of forgot

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that it even had her name on it. Because she

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of just go on about the health benefits. Sarah

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>also has a habit of not really disclosing her paid partnerships,

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and in the beginning, that's what all influencers did because

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have the same rules and restrictions in place.

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.199
<v Speaker 1>And that's why it's led a lot of consumers to

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like she genuinely cares about these products. Because when

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>she was at the height of her fame, probably about

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight years ago, she was synonymous with Tripeka

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>and also Loving Earth, and I remember going out and

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>buying Tripeka and Loving Earth, and a lot of people

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 1>have actually had the same experience where they've said I

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>actually tried it and I was like, this is revolting.

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Like I remember, Sarah kept saying that one of the

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>powders tasted like caramel. It didn't taste like caramel. It

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>was a lot earthier than that. And some people might

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>really love the flavor, but when you're being sold that

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>this is like some kind of caramel smoothie. I used

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Trapeka for quite a number of years, always thought it

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>tasted okay, but when you're being sold it's better than chocolate.

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.360
<v Speaker 1>She made that brand, Yeah, she did, and they did

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>part ways in kind of mysterious circumstances. It was over

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a year ago. Nothing was said, and you can see

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that Sarah isn't actually allowed to speak about the departure.

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is Tripeka has continued to sell body Bloom.

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>They just don't don't have Sarah's Day's name slapped on

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the packaging anymore. And it does lead you to question

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>just how much she had to do with the creation

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 1>of this powder. Well, they wouldn't be stupid. They would

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>own the formula to this and they would have said, look,

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>regardless of how much involvement you've apparently had in the

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>creation of it, we own this product. We're using your

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>name for marketing pace. That's the thing. I think that

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>she still could have been part of the creation process

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and maybe was involved in a couple of meetings where

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>she said, it's really important for me for this powder

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to have X, Y and Z. But I don't think

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>she had as much involvement as she initially sold that

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 1>she did. Well, we've seen her creating a new perfume

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and she might go in and say, I really like

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>this smell. But it's not that she's in the lab

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and she's designing every signature cent Really, it's probably the

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>same with this. She know. What's quite interesting is that

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of weeks she has been subtly

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>dropping hints about a new pre workout drink. So there's

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 1>been no paid partnerships, no hashtag ads, but she's just

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of videos of her stirring up another

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>powder in some of her water bottles before she works out.

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>So you're telling me now that we don't just suddenly

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>need a couple of probiotics, No, we now need a

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>pre workout drink. Where do you sound on this though?

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>How do you feel about Sarah no longer using body

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Blue now that she's not being paid for it? I mean,

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I obviously understand why she's not spooking it anymore because

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 1>she's not getting some kind of kickback from Trapeka to

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>do it. But it doesn't really make Sarah look good

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>because she has used this every day for six years

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and then suddenly because her name's not on it, it's

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>not worthy of her using it because she has pushed

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the benefits so much. It does make it look quite disingenuous. Yeah,

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can see why you would be reluctant

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:46.199
<v Speaker 1>to continue spooking a brand that maybe you finished on

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a sour note with, even if you really like the product,

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>because let's be real, this isn't some sort of magical powder.

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>There's clearly a lot of other products on the market

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that do the exact same thing. And if it was

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.199
<v Speaker 1>me and I had this long standing partner she with

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a brand and maybe though potentially were a jerk to

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>me or I was a jerk to them, I wouldn't

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>want to be promoting it. And we've got to remember

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>her social media is her business at the end of

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the day. We're not going to be naive and think

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that the reason she took all of this time to

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>capture body Bloom as part of her morning routine wasn't

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>because she was making money off it, like that's why

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>she was doing a lot of people genuinely thought in

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the early days that she was a huge fan of Tripeka.

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it started like that, maybe she started genuinely using

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it and then they reached out for to I think

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>she genuinely did believe in the product and it was

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 1>a win win for her because here's this product that

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>contained certain ingredients that give her health benefits that she's

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>happy to use. But she's also making money off. If

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 1>you go back and look at her old videos, the

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 1>amount of times they were featured, like every vlog she

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>was making herself some kind of green powdery thing. She

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 1>was being paid, of course she was, but I spec

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 1>had off to her because she's fucking good at what

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>she does. She makes you buy in. I mean, she

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>did a marketing degree, I think for a term or

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>something when she left school, and I think that she

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>actually learned a lot during this course. She is a

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>fucking marketing whiz. People buy into whatever she's selling because

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 1>she actually sells it well. And I think that that

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>is a real talent in order to get people to

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>buy into your world, buy into what you're selling. It's

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>really interesting because this isn't the first time a product

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>has continued to be produced just without Sarah's name and branding.

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Around five years ago, she brought out those natural deodorants

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 1>with Lebang. I used to buy those, and so you

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>bought it. You've brought into all of this, Yeah, but

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>oh I did, and I bought into the whole natural deodoran.

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>I still think that that's a good concept. Fuck I

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:45.360
<v Speaker 1>stunk using it. My husband boyfriend at the time, had

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to tell me to stop wearing it because he's like,

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, but this just does not work. No. I know,

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>with natural deodorance, you do have to use them for

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks until they start being affected. And

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because le bang Body ended up splitting ways

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>with Sarah's Day, but they continue to sell this natural

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>deodor and I'd love to know the figures how much

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>money they're still making without Sarah's Day's name attached to her. Well,

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it must be pretty successful because they're still

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>selling it. And at the time, unlike Drepeka, they actually

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>made it very public that they were parting ways with her,

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and they ended up thanking her for taking a chance

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>on them. It was kind of awkward though, because they

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>did this gushy post about Sarah and she ended up

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>not liking it, not commenting on it, and making no

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>statement about le Bain going forward. So it wasn't the

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>whole marketing pitch about this is our end of like

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>collaboration with Sarah. Yeah, it was, it's like, let's get

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>rid of this shit and we're just going to put

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>our new logo on it. A couple of years ago,

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Sarah did speak on her podcast about blacklisting brands that

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>she worked with in the past, and she blacklisted them

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>when things had turned sour, and he Housepan Kurt joked

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>that they should name and shame the brands then, and

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>they're on the podcast, but Sarah said she didn't want

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 1>to get sued. And she went on to say that

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>one brand in question and treated her like a punching bag,

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 1>and she was encouraged by friends to take legal action

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>for money that they owed her. It's pretty out there

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>for her to actually say these kinds of comments because,

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>as we touched on, she doesn't work with that many sponsors,

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>so you could whittle it down to a number of

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the brands that she's worked with over the years. I

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>found this line quite interesting. She also said that she

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 1>ends up trying to seek revenge on brands that she

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 1>parts ways with by dominating the competition. So maybe I

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of like that. I do like that too. Maybe

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:34.199
<v Speaker 1>that's why she's releasing this new pre workout drink. She's like,

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe it's her own project that she's going to

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>do solely her. I'd love to know how Georgie Stevenson

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>feels about that because she of course has Naked Harvest,

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>which is doing exceptionally well. Well, it's the perfect time

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:47.719
<v Speaker 1>for her to release it, because she's finally about to

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>release her pregnancy ebook as well. Well, you'd hope if

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Sarah brings out a pre workout drink she focuses a

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>lot on the taste of it, because Naked Harvests are

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>one brand that I have used and they actually do

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>days really yummy. Well, Sophie, let's get into our Friday debrief,

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and I want to kick things off with it's more

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of a Friday frustration. So, as a lot of listeners

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.199
<v Speaker 1>will know, I got married last year in January, and

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm yet to change my last name. You haven't either.

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>It's more out of laziness than anything else. It just

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>seems like a big job to do and one that

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't be bothered to do right now. Well, I

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>only got my ass into gear because I'm having a

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>baby in April and I really want to have the

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 1>same name as my child, and I want that last

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>name to simply be Humphreys. So Dale's last name is

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Spurway Humphreys. However, I've just discovered that now I've got

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>to jump through hoops because I can't just obtain a

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>marriage certificate. Apparently I've got to go through the full

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>legal name change because you can't just take one of

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 1>your partner's names. That seems absurd to me. I think

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>if they have a double barrel name, you should just

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to take one of those names. The stupid

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>thing is I could extend the last name quite easily

0:26:57.400 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>and go Spaway Humphreys Toll, but that's allowed. But I

0:26:59.880 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>can't just take one of the days. That's just fucking stupid.

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry for anyone if they have a three barrel name,

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>but I mean Dale can barely fit his name on

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a passport. Imagine trying to fit Taba on there as well.

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 1>On his driver's license, they actually have to shrink his

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>full name down because he's also got two middle names.

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 1>And I just see why. I just want my child

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to have the last name Humphreys. And if your child

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is going to have a double barreled name, you would

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>like it to be your maiden name and only one

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of your husband's. Last night, I was smoking with Dale

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 1>because I'm like, if my last name is now officially

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Humphreys and the baby's last name is Humphreys. It almost

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 1>looks as if he's then taken on my last name.

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I've got another share for you, Sophie, because Kate's away.

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.199
<v Speaker 1>So this morning I went into my midwife appointment, and

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>anyone who has been knows that you have to give

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:54.719
<v Speaker 1>a few identifying details when you check in to your

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>midwife appointments. So normally they say, oh, tell me your address,

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 1>what's your date of birth, et cetera. Today I was

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>asked a number of questions, and one of them included,

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>are you married? I nearly fell out of my chair

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>because when I enrolled into this hospital, they actually asked

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>me that already over the phone. Oh are you married?

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 1>What's the name of your husband? And I just thought

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>this is so irrelevant. But also is that because your

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>husband actually couldn't make that appointment? So you were there

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 1>on your own? Yeah? Yeah, I was there on my own?

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:27.360
<v Speaker 1>But is that why they asked? I don't know. No,

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I've never I have never been asked, even if I've

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>been by myself other times. Do you have a husband?

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 1>I was asked the first midwife appointment I went to

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>if I was married? And my husband was standing right

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>next to me, and I'm like yeah to him. But again,

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>as you say, why does it matter? It just I

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know. It came across as really judgmental, I think

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>because the woman was also a bit older. And what

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>though it's probably just a guideline, I have to ask,

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>because I don't what has that got to do with anything? Well,

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I just get youshed to show you fucking id and

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>but I call this is the person? Why is it?

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>All these random questions. It just made me feel comfortable

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>because I thought if I came in there and I

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>was feeling self conscious, or maybe I was doing this

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>on my own, or my husband had passed away, or

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it's quite a triggering question to be like,

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and are you married while you're standing there heavily pregnant.

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I just thought it was a bit off. If there's

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>anyone working in the health system that knows the answer

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to this question hit us up in our DMS, well,

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I had a bit of a win this week. I

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 1>have spent most of my nights searching for prints online

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>because I am doing up my laundrym at the moment

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and I really am going for this Mediterranean feel. I'm

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>such a basic bitch. I think I literally have the

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>same print that most people have. It's of Chinkwitira. I

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>ordered this print Amy, I didn't realize you actually had

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a very similar one in your whole way. Be fair.

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Most people who have European prints, they go for the

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Amalfi Coast. I went with Chanquitera because I went there

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>on holiday. Well, I went with it because I like

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the colors. Because you were like, I feel like you're

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>fraud because I've not actually been well, well, that was

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>my husband's argument. He said he didn't want the European

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Prince because he only wants to have prints up of

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>where we've been. And I said, but we've only been

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to Malaysia and Bali and Singapore. Port Hughes Poor Douglas

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>now and I'm like, I don't really want that in

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 1>my house. And our theme for a house is Mediterranean.

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I have been reading too many things on interior design

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and they say that you have to have three key

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 1>colors if you want your house to look really cool. Well,

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>we heard the other week now Kate's been scoffing about this.

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>How you said that you wanted your house to be

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 1>more like Yeah, she paid me out last week about that.

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>But my three key colors are pink, orange, and potentially yellow,

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>which is my favorite color, and I process to all

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>have those colors in them and be bright because everything

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>else is white. I was going to say, does that

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>mean you're like a lot of people who are now

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>ditching that beige aesthetic and they're going for pops of

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>color that seems to be the trend. Now, well, I'm

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>keeping everything white, as in the walls and most of

0:30:57.440 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the furniture is white and the rugs. But yeah, I'm

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>having these hoops of color. Anyway. I have been so

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>excited for this print to arrive, and I have copied

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you and bought some beautiful frames from Freedom and I

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>was so excited to put it in the frame see

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>what it looked like. And I realized that I ordered

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>an A one print but I had the border around it,

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and I was like fuck. I was like, is this

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>my fault? I think it was my fault, but I

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>contacted print place say was it my fault? I've actually

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>started to create a list of things, like silly things

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that you've blamed me for during I like today lists,

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>don't you. Yeah. So one of them has been that

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you wrung me up and blamed me because I told

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you to get it printed a one. I was like,

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>how on earth has this print called? I was concerned

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that you led me up the garden path with the frames. Anyway,

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the place I got them printed at was really amazing.

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>It's his store in Melbourne and it was clearly my fault.

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>They were so apologetic. They instantly said we will print

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you a new one without the border straight away. I

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 1>literally had it the next day. I was so impressed.

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>But now I'm on the hunt to find two more.

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>You pin Mediterranean spired princes. Wait, wait, did you get

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>it from what's it called? Etsy? No? It was from

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 1>an actual art house, so yeah, that they printed it.

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I chose the design from the art house. Yes, it's

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>from inca art house. They have all the different designs.

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I've told you. You go on Etsy, you pay for

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:21.959
<v Speaker 1>the I liked the colors in this one. They were

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>so much bright, exactly, it's brighter than yours. Have you

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>seen how bright the colors are? Anyway, So if anyone

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>has any cool basic bitch European prints that I should

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>be getting because I just can't decide what goes together,

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and I'm stretching out paid for the print. It was

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>forty percent off, so I paid seventy two dollars for

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>it to be printed. And the design Oh okay, well

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not too bad. Yeah, I'm just I wish they

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>had more of them. But I just want something with

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the pop of color. If anyone can help me out,

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 1>who's cooler? The man knows what looks good in houses? Well,

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I could always send you the prints that I already

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>have up in the house. No, it's something a bit different.

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been to Venice. I don't have the emotional

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 1>connection with that. I'm thinking more about Fia. Well, I

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's all we've got time for today. Thank you

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>for listening to another episode of Outspoken, And if you

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>haven't already, we would really appreciate if you could leave

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>us a five star review because that really is the

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>only way that the podcast grows, and we really appreciate

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>those people who have left us really nice reviews. Yeah,

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and I want to put some positive thoughts out for Kate.

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>She isn't in today's show because she is dealing with

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a snake situation in which we did speak about on

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>our Subs episode. There was a snake that turned up

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>at her house. I think over the weekend, and they've

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>got been very hot, and Kate lives up in the hills.

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>So unfortunately, yes, a brown snap, well a suspected brown

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>snake was in her yard hiding in some of the

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>rocks out there. So they got a snake catcher in

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and basically he has set up this large net and

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>they have been waiting for days for this thing to

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>come out, and Kate has two large golden retrievers. It's

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>all been a bit of a nightmare, having a baby

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and dealing with it all. To be honest, I think

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that that snake is long gone. I think it has

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>borrowed its way out somewhere else. I love how because

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it was Kate's husban re that spotted the snake, but

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 1>because it hasn't emerged, I think he started second guessing

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>himself because he now said, oh, maybe it was just

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 1>like a really large lizard with a long tail. So

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>she will be back next week, Yes she will. Before

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 1>we go, I also want to point out that we

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 1>are across the evolving story that is happening at the

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>moment between Mikayla Tester and Anna Paul. We decided that

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>We wanted to give the story a bit of space

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>so that Anna has a ride of reply. We will

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:30.359
<v Speaker 1>be covering the story in depth though on Tuesday's episode.

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>This episode was recorded on the traditional land of the

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Ghana people of the Adelaide Planes. We pay respect to

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Elder's past and present