WEBVTT - Stale Cookies and 'Cheating' Influencers 

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to Outspoken. It's your dose of the

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>hottest influencer and pop culture news twice a week. I'm

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Sophie Torba and coming up on today's show, a young

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>woman is claiming the husband of a well known Aussie

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>influencer has impregnated her. Anna macavoy calls Matt Sakowski out

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>for not inviting her to his joint Bucks party and

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the cookie pop up labeled a scam. But first, twin

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>sisters and influencers, Bridget and Dannielle for Long have shocked

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the Internet after revealing they share their underwear and only

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>have one brush between them.

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>So, the twenty seven year old influencers share over seven

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty five thousand followers on Instagram, and they

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>were interviewed on the Gows on the Go podcast when

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 1>they made the shot confession. Let's have a listen to

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>what they said.

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 3>We only have one bra.

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>We okay, stop, and we share underwear. So we share

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>underwear like a share drawer.

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and we only have one brad because it bras.

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 3>But whenever we need a bra, we're like, wait, we're

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 3>fighting over it, and well right.

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 4>Now I'm worried.

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 3>But ones need ones black, and and I just like

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 3>know what that is so niche, like the shares are

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 3>going to be like you guys are just.

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>As a triplet. I kind of get the sharing of underpants.

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's told me not to say this, but I

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of get it, because if you live together and

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you're doing the washing, sometimes you might get confused about

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>which pairs yours. But what has stumped me is the

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 1>fact that they share bras, Like that is a sure

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>fire way to have a huge argument, because what if

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>one day you're wearing a white top, or you're both

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>wearing white tops and you want the white bra, Like

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that's just pandemonium. Well, I actually think it's more revolting

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to share underpants than it is a bra. They get washed,

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>just like this stuff going on. Like I think when

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>we were kids, we probably incidentally shared underpants because whose

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>parent is really separating their undies? But when we moved

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in together, it was clear, these are my undies, these

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 1>are your unders. Some of them could have been mixed up,

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>but I'm off, I'm pretty chilled with this sort of

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that discuss me. Like, to be honest, I've

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of pairs of cats underpants at my

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>house that somehow got intertwined when we moved, and I

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>just wear them like, oh, I don't care. This is disgusting,

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and I just can sense some kind of daily mail article.

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 4>Hopefully who cares they get what?

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>It's funny because you just mentioned about the white and

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the black bra. Because after the girls made the confession

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast, one of the hosts said, well, who's

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>wearing the bra today? And they said, well, actually we

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>both have a bra on, so we have one black

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>bra and one white bra. But things do get heated

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>if they need that one colored bra. Yeah, well I can.

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>That's just stupid, like just go and buy a bra each.

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Obviously well off as well. They've got seven hundred and

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty five thousand followers. Maybe this was a ploy to

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>get some launderie brands to send them some on the surprise,

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as if they haven't had any already sending

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>them stuff. I also think it's because it's a new

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>cool girl young thing not to wear bras anymore. Like

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I've heard on the grapevine that small perky tits is

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>apparently in fashion. I mean, I don't know when it

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.679
<v Speaker 1>went out of fashion, having perky tits, but it happily

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>everyone wants small tits.

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 4>So we are in fashion amy.

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Yes, well I did notice this because a lot of

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the mannequins in the stores don't have bras on as well.

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 1>How old does that make me sound? But a lot

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of people have had a lot of opinions on this online.

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>So there were twins who were weighing into the comment

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>section of the now viral podcast clip. One twin said,

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>my twin and I don't even hug, let alone share underwear.

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>No straight to jail, and otherwise said my twin and

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I would first fight every day if we did this. Now,

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>there were some other sisters defending the girl's decision, and

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>they said, well, they have the same DNA. Well, another

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>twin said, she and her sister also do this. I

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's weird. I actually do not think it's

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>weird at all.

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, a twenty.

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Seven to share underpay.

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it's weird because they probably live together.

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>It's probably very difficult, they're.

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 4>The same size.

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>It's an I mean, it's quite a smart decision because

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you only have to do one load of washing, Like

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I share a towel with my partner. That's gross. I'm sorry,

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you're a grub and I'm concerned now that do you

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>have my underwear in your house?

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 4>No, you've got I wouldn't fucking take your underwear.

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>Well, okay, old bond shit. So if I've said to you, Sophie, oh,

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, like say you had to get changed,

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 1>I was like, here's a pair of my underpants. You

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:34.239
<v Speaker 1>can wear them. Would you wear them?

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 4>Depends what type they were.

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I would not if you said, I'd have the fucking

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>difference between socks.

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 4>There's something intimate about sharing someone's underpants.

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's weird.

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>What I love about these girls is they have been

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>having fun with this. So they recently shared a TikTok

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>joking that they were finally moving away from each other

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>after living together their whole lives, and in the video,

0:04:55.920 --> 0:05:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the girls are seen fighting over the nude bra. I

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>wonder if they were caught off guard about this, because

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's some like multiple like twin triplet things

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that you think are normal and then suddenly when you

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>repeat it to another person, you're like, oh, fuck, this

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>is actually quite weird. No, I think they were aware

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that they were going to shit over this. We're going

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to put something up on our Instagram and in our

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Facebook community. Any twins, triplets, sisters reach out?

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 4>Do you share the same underpants? And is it weird?

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 4>Chris paying seventeen dollars fifty for a stale fucking cookie?

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Not me.

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Australian fans of US cookie giant Crumble thought they were

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>in for a sweet treat when news broke on social

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>media that a pop up shop selling the popular cookies

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:40.239
<v Speaker 1>was coming to North Bondai.

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 4>However, fans have labeled.

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 1>The pop up store as a scam and accuse the

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>organizers of selling stale cookies.

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 4>Amy, I need to know more about this.

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, a lot of people on TikTok are currently

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 1>saying that this is their Roman Empire. So hundreds of

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>people lined up to get their hands on the popular

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>cookies after seeing promotions all over Instagram and Facebook from

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>an account called Crumble Sydney. Now, for those who haven't

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 1>heard of Crumble, it is a US owned store which

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 1>started in twenty seventeen and it has spread across the

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>US and Canada. There are currently no Crumble stores in Australia,

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>so this is why a lot of people got excited

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>when they heard about the pop up store, and what

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>has sparked a lot of anger. Firstly is the price

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 1>of the cookies. So a Crumble cookie in the US

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>will set you back around five US dollars, which is

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent of seven Australian dollars. However, when people arrived

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>at this pop up store, they were being charged seventeen

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars fifty per cookie. Like, firstly, who has seventeen dollars

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty in this cost of living crists to spend on

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a cookie? That is extortion. I'm sorry, that is absolutely

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>taking the piss and taking advantage of people. Well, you

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>could get a box of five cookies for forty five dollars,

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>still fucking crazy. And they were also selling Crumble cookie

0:06:56.200 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>cutters for a whopping seventy five dollars each one cookie.

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, oh fuck Wait what's the shape of the cookie cutter?

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>What a circle? Yeah? Nothing that remarkable. And a lot

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of the people in this line were actually TikTokers because

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>people were wanting to do a lot of the taste

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>test videos. So I saw one woman on TikTok who

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>had bought ten cookies costing one hundred and seventy five dollars. Now,

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the shit really hit the fan after the pop up

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>when dozens of disappointed customers hit out at the organizers

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>on social media and they started to complain that the

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:33.119
<v Speaker 1>cookies tasted stale, and it became evident that the event

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>was not a real Crumble pop up, and unhappy customers

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>started labeling the organizers as deceptive and dishonest. Now can

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you believe that it has actually come out that the

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>event was organized by some randoms who basically just flew

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to the US, bought a thousand Crumble cookies over there,

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and flew them back like that is a reality.

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 4>Wait now, then how did they fly them all back? Though?

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Like what they brought? So many suits? They cases or

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>sent them. I mean, no, one of these things was stale.

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>They'll probably tasted like rocks, I know. So everything basically

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>began unraveling online, and that's when the organizers shut down

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>their Instagram page and they started removing all of their

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>posts on TikTok and they tried to distance themselves from

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>this firestorm. So the backlash prompted the organizers to finally

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>release a statement which is linked on their TikTok account,

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's funny because they've since changed their bio so

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it now reads not endorsed by Crumble, just fans importing now.

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>The release they put out was incredibly detailed, and I

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>think this is because this is becoming a huge story.

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>It's making international headlines. And in the statement they confirmed

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>they were not officially Crumble, but claimed it was clearly

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>stated in their bio and comments. They wrote, our goal

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>was to bring the authentic Crumble cookies to Australia by

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>importing the cookies directly from the USA. They also confirmed

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that the cookies were genuine Crumble cookies because there are

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people on TikTok saying well did they

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>just bring in the boxes and make their own cookies,

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>So they confirmed that they traveled to the US to

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>purchase them and they imported them with their original packaging.

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 1>They even included receipts to show exactly how much they

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>paid for the cookies. The statement also addressed the trademark

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>concern saying at no point did they use their trademark

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>in their videos on TikTok. But if you look at

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>all of the videos on TikTok of the pop up

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>store that other people are sharing, you can clearly see

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that the Crumble logo is on a lot of the

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:35.439
<v Speaker 1>marketing material now in regards to food stanits because there

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of concern by TikTok users saying, well,

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:40.719
<v Speaker 1>what would have happened if someone got seriously ill from

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>one of these cookies?

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 4>And how old are they?

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so a lot of people were actually saying I

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>actually felt quite sick after consuming one. So the organizers

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>claim that the Crumble cookies should be kept at room

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>temperature in an air tight container for up to three

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>days or refrigerated for ups a day for a cookie

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to last, particularly when you consider the fact that they're

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>full of sugar, which makes them last longer. Yeah, they

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>would have been awful. So the organizer said, we kept

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>them to these requirements. Some were warm to enhance their texture,

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>which is what Crumble does as well. I mean, what

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of proof do they have though, because they were

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>importing a huge amount of cookies into the country, Like,

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I highly doubt that these were refrigerated. Now, things got

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>really juicy when they released information on their apparent profits

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and costs. So the organizers claimed it was never about

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>making money from this pop up. They said it was

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>all about bringing the cookies to crumble fans. So is

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that why they charged extortionate prices and seventy five dollars

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>for a fucking cookie cutter? Like, come on, I think

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>they know they're in the wrong because they've even itemized

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>their costs. So they've said they spent four thousand dollars

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>on flights and luggage to get the cookies back. I mean,

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they probably went over and had a bit

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of a holiday in the US. Yeah, go over to

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 1>get cookies. Oh, it was all very professional. Why am

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I getting in my head newman from Seinfeld when he

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>was brought in with all of the bad of muffins,

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Like for some reason, I just imagine this, you know,

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 1>just all these cookies in different suitcases makes me feel sick.

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>They also said that they spent six thousand dollars on

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the cookies and packaging, two thousand dollars on duties and

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>taxes because they did claim the cookies when they brought

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>them into Australia, and they said they spent over one

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars on staff fees. So this equals thirteen thousand

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars in costs. Now, if you do the sums they

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>had around one thousand cookies which they were selling for

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>seventeen dollars fifty so I'm not taking into account the

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>cookie cutters, but they would have made around seventeen and

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a half grand. So they're trying to imply that they

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>only made a profit of four and a half grand.

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, would you really go to all of this

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>effort for four and a half grand? Well, I feel

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>like they would have made a fuck time if anyone

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>was buying those cookie cutters as well. But it's clear

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that they did this for a profit. They didn't just

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>do it out of the goodness of their hearts, because

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>they're so keen to bring these cookies to Australia and

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.359
<v Speaker 1>it's such a dumb move because they've opened themselves up

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to one what if people got really sick from the cookies?

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Two the legalities around taking a brand's name and pretending

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that you're part of that brand. They were on the

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>legal front. They also went on to claim in this

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>statement that what they did wasn't illegal, so they said

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>it is called parallel importing. So parallel importing is defined

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>as a business who buys genuine products from overseas and

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>imports and sells them in Australia without authorization from the manufacturer.

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 1>So it's also known as gray importing. So a business

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>who is supplying parallel imports must one make sure the

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>products comply with Australian Product safety and labeling requirements. And

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>this is where I think they might be in a

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>bit of hot water, because I don't know if they

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:47.839
<v Speaker 1>can actually say that it complied with Australian Food and

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Safety lord. Where was it written that the cookies had

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to be refrigerated after three days or whatever they're saying.

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Where I think they might get in hot water is

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>under the consumer rights section of parail importing. It states

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that people engaging in parallel importing cannot identify a relationship

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>or any association between the seller and the manufacturer. And

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>they have come out on Instagram and TikTok calling themselves

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Crumble Sydney. If you are Joe Blow and you see that,

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you just assume they are part of the Crumble business.

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>This story is everywhere and the Today Show interviewed Sydney

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>lawyer Johann Kalanta who weighed in on the debacle. So

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>he said it was clearly a case of them scamming

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>people and he even went as far as suggesting that

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the real Crumble should pursue legal action. He said, the

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>reality is they passed themselves off as Crumble, and once

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>they were called out online, all of a sudden, they

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 1>were claiming they're just cookie enthusiasts. They said they were

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 1>just here to provide an experience or a taste, but

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 1>as a trademark infringement. Now it's unclear whether the company

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 1>will actually take legal action against his pop up stores.

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>So far, we have only heard from one of Crumble's

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>co founders, Sawyer Hemsley. So he actually commented on an

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Australian tiktoker's video and she had obtained ten of the

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Crumble cookies from Sydney and he wrote, you need to

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>try them fresh in the USPS. This pop up is

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>not affiliated with Crumble Cookie, so it's quite clear the

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>big wigs are aware of what is happening. Now, Sophie,

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>do you think this is actually good or bad pr

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>for Crumble? I've never heard of Crumble before, which I

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>mean people are probably like, what the hell, But I haven't.

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I've never traveled to America, so I don't understand the

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>total craze over this cookie. So For me, it's maybe

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>more curious to think about wonder what it tastes like,

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>wonder what the different flavors are.

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 4>And clearly the.

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Fact that there were thousands of people or hundreds of

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>people lining the street and willing to pay seventeen fifty

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.479
<v Speaker 1>for a cookie, it shows that they must be delicious,

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and it shows that it's a brand that there's a

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of interest and intrigue around. Well, this pop up

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>star has almost done a lot of hardin lifting for

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Crumble because they've already tested the market for them. They

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>know people want it desperately. But I think there are

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>aspects that's quite bad for Crumble because a lot of

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>people might not have been able to differentiate between the

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>real Crumble store and this pop up and they might

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>assume that this is what their cookies taste like, old

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and stale. Well, so it's probably good for Crumble that

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>there has been so much publicity around it, though we'll

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>have to wait and see what actually happens to the organizers.

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I think this will not be the last we hear

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of this story.

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 5>You were fucking about to blow this man's lifer.

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Popular author Kate Forster has dropped a bomb on TikTok

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>revealing that the husband of a well known Aussie influencer

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>has allegedly impregnated a young woman he was having an

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>affair with. Now, before we get into the weeds, as

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a refresher, who is Kate Forster. Well, her name will

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>sound familiar because back in August we discussed how she'd

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>gone viral for calling out the Henny Cardigan that was

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>actually one of my favorites in a long time, And

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>since then she has exploded in popularity on TikTok. She

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>has over sixty thousand followers, and she offers advice and

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>she does funny reviews.

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 4>I absolutely love her content.

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I think she is a legend and she's really taken

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>on this new role of an agony art, which is

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>why I think so many people feel comfortable sending her

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>in gossip.

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.239
<v Speaker 4>Because she said that her dms are full.

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Of information about influencers or people in the public eye,

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and she doesn't know what people want her to do

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>with the information. Now, usually Kate sits on information like this, However,

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>she decided to reveal a few details, so on TikTok

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>she shared a video entitled Secrets in the Dms and

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>added the tea is brewing now. In this video, Kate

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>revealed that a woman in her early twenties is allegedly

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>having an affair with the husband of a quite well

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>known Aussie influencer. Now, the young woman claims she is

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>now pregnant and wants to keep the baby, but the

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>husband is adamant he doesn't want to keep it and

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>has not told his wife about the affair. Now, the

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>reason that Kate chose to divulge this rumor is because

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>she believes the information is true. Here's what she said.

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 5>It's just the wife is selling this lifestyle and it's

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 5>not like that because the husband is fucking groping for

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 5>trout in a peculiar river, as Shakespeare once said. So

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 5>as far as I could tell, and she sent me

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 5>some Instagram receipts, I think it is true. And I

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 5>said to her, you are fucking about to blow this

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 5>man's life up if you go public with his because

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 5>she wants to go public. And I said, and you're

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 5>going to blow the wife's life up because she clearly

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 5>doesn't know, or it looks like she doesn't know. I

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 5>don't know. You can't tell anything about social media.

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel really sorry for this particular influencer if this

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>is true, because it would be awful having all of

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>these people know this information about you but you don't

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>know anything about it yet. Yeah, I feel a lot

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of sympathy for her as well. Kate was careful not

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:05.479
<v Speaker 1>to outline too many distinguishing details about the couple to

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 1>the point where I'm struggling to figure out who it

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>is myself, and I think it would be irresponsible for

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 1>us to even guess guess who it is because we

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>have no idea. We don't even know if this story

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 1>is true. This is just a rumor now. The only

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>real clues are that the wife is an Aussie influencer

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>who is trying to build a TikTok following, so that

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.719
<v Speaker 1>could be so many people, and that the couple are

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.479
<v Speaker 1>selling this lifestyle that doesn't appear to be true. So

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing they post about having the perfect family and

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:37.919
<v Speaker 1>the perfect relationship and our in defense of this Oussie influencer.

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 1>If she doesn't know about the cheating, maybe she thinks

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 1>that her and her husband do have a perfect relationship

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and she's been blindsided by the whole thing, so what

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>she is sharing online feels real to her.

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 4>If that makes sense.

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, look, we've spoken about it before. A

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of what you see on Instagram and TikTok, we

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>all know it's fake.

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well this just makes me feel so because can.

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 1>You imagine if your husband was having an affair and

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>instead of him or this woman coming to you privately

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and telling you what happened, you find out by literally

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a TikTok video like someone going public about it online,

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>presumably for Clout as well. He was gonna say, I mean,

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 1>what are her motivations for going public? I mean, if

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 1>she really wants the wife to know, why doesn't she

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>just contact her in her DMS and said why does

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I have to be so public? And also why is

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:27.199
<v Speaker 1>she contacting Kate Forster?

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand why you would DM a total stranger

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>about this private information. The only reason I can think

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of is that this woman is incredibly young, and she's

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.199
<v Speaker 1>pregnant at the moment, so she probably feels out of

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>control and really vulnerable. And maybe she's going to Kate

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.120
<v Speaker 1>because she's seen her videos online. Maybe she views her

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>as a bit of a motherly figure and she can't

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>speak to her friends and family in her life. Maybe

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't know that this affair has been going on,

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and she doesn't feel like she can trust anyone else,

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>or maybe she feels like they're going to her.

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 4>But it is quite a weird thing to do.

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>It is really weird. I have noticed this trend on

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>TikTok though, where a lot of former influencers or just

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>general people are calling out influencers but not naming them

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 1>and saying they've had this run in or this happened

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to an event, and it's kind of I mean, we're

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously talking about it now, we're not naming any names,

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>but one as a viewer, it's incredibly frustrating because you

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>want to know who they're talking about. And I also

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>really enjoy it because it's almost that fun game of

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 1>working out who it is, which can be damaging as well. Yeah,

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the only people who would not be having fun with

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>this trend is the influencers themselves, so the tagged in

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the comments section. Yeah. Well, I also think there's probably

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a part of this young woman who wants the information

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to go public, and that's why she's telling Kate. Maybe

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>she thinks that by Kate putting this video out there,

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it'll act as a bit of a warning to the

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>husband that she means business and maybe it'll force him

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to tell the wife. Let's hope he's following Kate Forster

0:20:57.960 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>so you can see the video.

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 4>I was interested here Kate's advice to the woman.

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So she told her that she is always going to

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>be the mistress and that she is basically going to

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>fuck up her life by going public with this news.

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>She also told her that the husband is probably having

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 1>numerous affairs and she's not special, and that if she

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 1>goes ahead with her pregnancy, her future child is going

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to grow up with this shit. Dad wow. And also

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 1>if the wife does find out, that kid will probably

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 1>never be included in any family things. I mean, advice

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 1>is pretty spot on. Well, she has got a point there,

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>because if you think about any traditional media stories that

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>come out on mistresses or affairs, it is always the

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>woman's fault somehow. Well, it's quite interesting because I don't

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>know if Kate has been monitoring her comments section, because

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly there haven't been many guesses as to who the

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>couple is. I think that she's kept it so vague

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that people aren't really sure, which is a good thing

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>but also a bad thing because I wonder how many

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>married Ossie influences are now suspicious of their husbands over

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>this past week, like shaking their phone. She's probably had

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to keep it vague for legal reasons as well, because

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you can't be making it too niche. There aren't that

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>many OZSI influencers out there. It's pretty funny because in

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Kate's comment section, people are calling her the real life

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>gossip girl and said that her advice was spot on,

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and another follower said, what a loser husband sticking his

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>unprotected dick wherever he wants and has a wife at home.

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I hope he gets what he deserved. The response was

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>quite mixed in our Facebook group though, because many people

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>were saying that they love Kate and she's the best

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>thing to happen to TikTok, whilst others felt like she'd

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>lost them on this one. They thought it wasn't really funny,

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly when children are involved. Well, I'm just surprised it

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.959
<v Speaker 1>hasn't popped up on OZSI influencer updates or something like that.

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I have a bit of a bones pick with you.

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Former Love islander Anna McAvoy has been left off the

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 1>invite list of Tammy Hembro and matt's Kowski's joint Hucks party.

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:05.439
<v Speaker 1>The festivities are kicking off this weekend on the Gold Coast,

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:08.959
<v Speaker 1>with Anna making it clear she's hurt not to be included.

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 1>So Anna brought it up on her and Matt's joint podcast.

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's have a listen to what she said.

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.360
<v Speaker 2>So, Matt Zukowski, sitting in front of me right here,

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 2>invited my brother before I even copped and invite. I

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 2>actually had to ask for an invite from you, which

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 2>is actually rude crash my hens party.

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>But you didn't. You were like, do you have anything

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to ask me? You answered the phone call like that.

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 2>It's just about the fact that we are long term friends.

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Didn't want to be business partners. Do you want to

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>waste anyone's time? It would be nice to help an invite. Well,

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>did I not say you're more than welcome to come?

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't want to be more than welcome

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to come. I want to be invited.

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 4>More than welcome to come. Feels like a pity party.

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 1>What an absolute cop out to say.

0:23:57.960 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Oh, you're more than welcome to come.

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.919
<v Speaker 1>I would not feel comfortable one to book flights to

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the Gold Coast to attend a party where I didn't

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>get a proper invite because you would literally feel like

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you were a second thought and as if you were

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>intruding on this. So the bad PR train for Matzakowski

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 1>is continuing. It's not a good look for him. I mean,

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Anna sounded genuinely hurt, like you could tell her in

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:23.680
<v Speaker 1>her voice.

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 4>And there's gonna be so much.

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Hype around this Hucks party as well, there's gonna be

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be all over social media. He would feel

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>so excluded. It's like a high school when you don't

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>get invited to the big party and you know what's

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>happening that weekend. And I always think that exclusion is

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a form of bullying, like at school. I wonder if

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>it's because it's only Matt's male friends that are coming

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>as his half of this Hucks party, or he said

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 1>that he didn't invite her because she doesn't quote unquote

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>like the culture that his mates bring when he hangs

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>out with them. The douchebag, Well that's what I was

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>gonna say. So does that mean he acts like an

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>immature jerk around his friends or maybe his friends are

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>not trustworthy when they're on the piss like again, that.

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 4>Did not paint a good picture.

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Can I just add in before we get anybody commenting

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>in our reviews that we've stuffed up the word Bucks party,

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>We're actually referring to a Hucks party. Now that is

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a term for a joint Hens and Bucks party. Well,

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of who he's inviting, he has eight male friends,

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.959
<v Speaker 1>so a handful of them are his groomsmen. So I

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>get why it could maybe feel weird if Anna was

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>joining them doing all the blokey activities. But I think

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>at the heart of this, she could have been invited

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 1>to Tammy's section of it because they're all planning on

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>meeting up at the end of the night at this

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>airbnb to keep the party going, so she could have

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a bit separate. Yeah, so it's separate, so she but

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 1>but Anna could have hung out with the girls. And

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I get that Tammy maybe having a smaller group of

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>close friends, but you think he would try and include

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Anna because she is Matt's close friend and business part Okay,

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>now I get it a little bit more. Because I

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>initially thought that this Hucks party was one joint party.

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize they were having separate things. I think

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is a case of that Tammy doesn't really

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 1>want her there, and she probably is friendly with Anna,

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>but if she's only having super close friends, then having

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Matt's podcast host come there it probably, I don't know,

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it might open the door up for other people who

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>now will be offended, but they were invited. I just

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>think it plays into these consistent rumors that there's beef

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>between the two of them, and that started when Tammy

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 1>was promoting Bondi San's and not Anna's tanning company. And

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>then Anna put out this cryptic video which seemed like

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it was about Tammy, which I actually think is all crap.

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>But the sad thing is it just sort of buys

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>into this theory that they're not close, even though, as

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you say, if you were just having a super tight

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and intimate HENS party, you don't really want hangers on.

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>But in this case, it's clear that Anna is upset

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>about it, and I think it's also extra rude of

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.199
<v Speaker 1>Matt because Matt attended her Hens party. Yeah, so she

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>had a three day event and he dropped past to

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 1>be involved in the game. She said that he crashed

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the party, and it did seem like Tammy wasn't actually invited.

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 1>To Anna's Hen's party as well. But if you think

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 1>about it, that was back in April, so Tammy and

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt had only been together for five months, and Anna

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and Tammy don't live in the same state, so it's

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 1>not as though they've exactly had all of this time

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to get close and hang out with each other. But

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:30.360
<v Speaker 1>now that they are going to be friends for life,

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>I do think Anna could have been included. I just

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's a case of Matt not explaining things properly

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:39.159
<v Speaker 1>to Anna and not having that sensitive conversation where he's like,

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I really want you there, but I don't know, would

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you feel comfortable being around my friends?

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 4>But if she joined up when everyone got together at the.

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>End, yeah, but are you really flying all the way

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to the Gold Coast to meet up at like twelve

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>o'clock at night.

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's such a weird idea because Matt

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>said that it was his idea to do the joint party,

0:27:56.720 --> 0:28:00.719
<v Speaker 1>and his reason was that he wanted his friends and

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Tammy's friends to get to know each other and build

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a rapport before the wedding. But is it really good

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to meet up when everyone's shit faced at the end

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of the night, Like, isn't that when you don't want

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to meet people because they're at their most obnoxious, Especially

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.400
<v Speaker 1>after hearing Tammy's sisters interviewed on Matt and Anna's podcast,

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I want to be a fly on

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the wall of this Hucks party. It's going to go off.

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if the whole Hucks party thing was down

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to a breakdown of trust, because you know, wild shit

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>goes on at Bucks parties, and maybe he knew that

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 1>Tammy would feel more comfortable knowing that they were sharing

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:36.199
<v Speaker 1>a bed at the end of the night instead of

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>it being sort of up in the air. Well, Matt

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>revealed it's actually his best man that is planning the party,

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and so far he knows that his best mates are

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:46.959
<v Speaker 1>all flying in from Melbourne, So all the boys are

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>heading to an activity, then going to dinner for steak

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and whiskeys, and then they're joining up with Tammy and

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the girls at a joint rental. I can kind of

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>see even more why Anna wasn't invited, Like, really, she

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to go to a fucking steak restaurant with

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>these guys, But I think the complete opposite. She should

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>have been invited to Tammy's shindy, Like, yeah, Tammy probably

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to there as we've just a stab. But again,

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been on the receiving end of this where I

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>wasn't invited to a former partner's best friends hen's party,

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't feel good because you're like, well, they

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>especially if they have.

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 4>A large group of people going, You're like, well do

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 4>they not like me?

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Like?

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 4>Why didn't I make the cart?

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Very awkward, particularly when this is going to be all

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>over social media, like you would just feel like you

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>were missing out. Now, Matt has one big job to

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 1>take care of ahead of his wedding, and that is

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the removal of his ex girlfriend's name, which is tattooed

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>across his ass. So he has Jen written on his

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 1>right bum cheek with a huge love heart around it.

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>It's something that I personally would want my partner to

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>get rid of before we officially tied the knob. I

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's going to be able to get rid

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of it before November, because I'm pretty sure you have

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:58.959
<v Speaker 1>to have about a four week break between each lazer session.

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 4>This wasn't his f laser session.

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>He had been putting it off because he found the

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>other session so painful. Why is he advertising this though, Well,

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>he's advertising it because he had a paid partnership, so

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 1>he realized he could monetize this process and he lined

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 1>up a deal with a numbing cream brand, so he

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>is taking his followers along for the journey and said

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>he was able to return to get it removed because

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>he had the numbing cream, which made it less wowful.

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll remember Tammy had Matt's name tattooed on her. I

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>think he was at a White Fox abouts and he.

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 4>Ended up having Tammy on him as well.

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, so he hasn't learned his lesson. He's got

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a list of girls on tattooed on him. Now, we've

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>had so much to cover in today's episode that we're

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>going to keep our highs and lows of the week

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>for our Subs episode, which comes out on Friday. But

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us for this episode.

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>It was a lot of fun. Don't forget to follow

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>us on Instagram and on TikTok at Outspoken Underscore the

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Underscore podcast.

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 4>This podcast was recorded on the traditional.

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Land of the Ghana people of the Adelaide Planes. We

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>pay respect to elders past, impresent,