WEBVTT - Molly-Mae's '24 Hour' Backlash, The 'Sneaky Arsehole' Leak & The Insta Hack

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:01.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Outspoken.

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 2>The podcast is not afraid to say exactly what you're thinking.

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Our names are Amy Kate and Sophie Torber.

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 2>We're identical triplets, but we often don't have identical opinions,

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 2>so sometimes things can get heated. Outspoken covers all things

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 2>reality TV, influencers, entertainment, and issues facing women. That is

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 2>so fetch Thank you, Welcome back to another episode of Outspoken.

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>We wanted to kick off today's.

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Podcast by discussing tear my situations with your parents, because

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 2>we all consider our mum our best friend. But I

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:39.520
<v Speaker 2>feel like there are just some things that you don't

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 2>discuss with your mum, and there are also some things

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 2>that you just don't want to know about as well.

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>So I feel like that's even the case with the

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:47.480
<v Speaker 1>three of us.

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Like some people might think that we share intimate details

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 2>with one another, or that we get change in front

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 2>of one another, but we do have some.

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, guidelines, abound boundary.

0:00:58.120 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 2>We'll go to the toilet in front of each other,

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 2>but I wouldn't like have a shower in front of you.

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there's a bit of a line.

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 2>But the stupid thing is we probably look exactly the same, Like,

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 2>I just find it quite funny. I don't think it'd

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 2>be as embarrassed about that. I think that was more

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 2>through puberty that you don't want to be seen, I suppose.

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we're all over that now.

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we didn't even when we were little, discuss

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 2>our periods with each other, Like we all kept it quiet,

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 2>But now we always discuss it. So maybe it's a

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 2>thing about getting older. I feel like that was only

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 2>as much. I thought that was only when we were twelve. Anyway,

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 2>I think this conversation is getting two TMI well. That

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 2>being said, I also don't think that most people share

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 2>intimate parts about their personal relationships with their mum the

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 2>way that influencer Saffron Barker has. Yeah, so so I

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 2>when I were cacking ourselves this week watching twenty one

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 2>year old YouTuber Saffron Barker and her latest video entitled

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 2>asking My Mum Questions.

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>You're too afraid to ask yours? Now, this isn't a

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>new trend.

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 2>There have been other videos released, but I feel like

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 2>this was probably the most honest one of these videos

0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 2>I've seen. So some of the questions Saffron asked her

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 2>mum included has she ever heard Saffron having sex in

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 2>her bedroom? Do her mum and dad still have sex?

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 2>And does Saffron's mum go snooping in her room?

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Now her mum?

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Wendy, she was an absolute trooper during this video and she.

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Answered some of the questions.

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes I feel like too honestly. Let's have a listen

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 2>to what Wendy said.

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you still have sex with dad?

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 1>God, I didn't want to ask.

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 4>I think I am not hundred Sometimes when I have to, oh,

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 4>are you forty six? Forty six? Forty six? I think

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 4>you answer is probably still yes. I think people probably

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 4>have sex a lot longer than that. To be fairly clean,

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 4>you out thinking about it, out thinking about myself so

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 4>at that age, or anything, but to be honest, to

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 4>quench me, I think, abou anyone having sex and I'll

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 4>try not to right.

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Probably a good idea. So well, this question is is

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 2>sex still is good after doing it with self?

0:02:57.480 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, because I like to change it up

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 4>a bit. When I can shut up, I think I'm

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 4>not asking for I don't want to hear this. From

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 4>a point of view is as a person, I feel

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 4>like the more you have sex for the same person

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 4>the more we get to know each other, like, so

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 4>I would imagine that that probably is better. There's some

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.679
<v Speaker 4>random dude that you just met that like probably just

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 4>wants it all for himself. Oh god, I'm maybe getting

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 4>paid for this. I wanted to go to Costo and

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 4>get a coffee and not even getting that. I'll get

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 4>you that thank you think you're glad. You might need

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 4>a box there.

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 2>I feel like Wendy should get some of the ad

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 2>revenue off this video because she was absolutely amazing. I

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 2>did love the tension in the car because you could

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 2>tell that this wasn't rehearsed. They actually genuinely felt awkward.

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it was the same sort of mood

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 2>when there's a sex scene on and you're sitting with

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 2>your parents and everyone's trying to look away at the screen.

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that was the vibe going on in

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that car.

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it was also a bit contentious because

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Saffron has recently just broken up with her ex boyfriend,

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 2>so I feel like the mum was kind of going

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 2>there with some of the comments about the because she

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 2>also said that she can't stand Saffron's baby voice, that

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 2>she did with him. Yeah, that was one of my

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 2>favorite bits because I remember when they were together there

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 2>was a few potshots made about the baby voice, but.

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>You could tell the mum went in hard. Then once

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>they've broken up.

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 2>I do love Wendy. She almost reminds me a bit

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 2>of the mum out of mean girls. It's like kind

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:23.919
<v Speaker 2>of the cool mum that's willing to sort of have

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 2>these conversations with her daughter. It's funny because this YouTube

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 2>is all about questions you're too afraid to ask your parents.

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 2>But these are just questions that I would never ever

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 2>ever want to know the answer.

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 3>You can't just be happy with where you are, like,

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 3>there's always more to.

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 4>Be a cheat.

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 2>UK influencer Molly May Haig has been labeled tone deaf

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 2>and privileged after commenting on a podcast that we all

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 2>have the same twenty four hours in the day. The

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 2>backlashes spark discussions about the shifting ways we view work,

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 2>as well as how we respond to successful women. So, Kate,

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 2>can you tell us exactly what happened?

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:57.559
<v Speaker 5>Well?

0:04:57.600 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Molly May has.

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Come under fire for comments she may on popular podcast

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Diary of a CEO and to be totally transparent, we

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 2>did do a segment on Molly May's interview with Stephen

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 2>Bartlett when the episode dropped back on the thirteenth of December. However,

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 2>we did not cover the twenty four hour statement at

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 2>the time, nor did the mainstream media, who instead chose

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 2>to create headlines about Molly having no friends and choosing

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 2>to make money over making time with friends. Now, the

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 2>comment at the time didn't stick out to us because,

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 2>to put it into perspective, the episode in question was

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 2>over an hour and forty two minutes long and it really.

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Did cover a lot.

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 2>So the backlash only just hit over the weekend after

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 2>a condensed version of the clip was shared on Twitter

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.799
<v Speaker 2>and TikTok. Now, Sophy, can you tell us more about

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 2>the comment the comments in question that have come under

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 2>fires around privilege and background And before we do get

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 2>into the quotes, I really wanted to provide some context

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 2>that I don't feel was given in the press coverage

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:54.359
<v Speaker 2>or in the social media clips.

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>So going into the.

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Podcast, as the name suggests, Diary of a CEO is

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 2>a podcast which explores the unfiltered journey of some of

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 2>the world's most influential people and experts, and it is

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.239
<v Speaker 2>targeted as a motivational podcast that sheds light on people's

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 2>remarkable rises to success and also gives insights into how

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 2>they got there now.

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>The host, Stephen.

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Bartlett, is a twenty nine year old British businessman who

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 2>was born in Botswana and moved to the UK at

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 2>the age of two, and he describes himself as a

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 2>university dropout who once stole food from a corner shop

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 2>and forage for loose change to keep his hunger at bay.

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Now Stephen dropped out of UNI and founded two social

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 2>media marketing companies called Social Chain and Media Chain, which

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 2>are now worth over three hundred million pounds, and he

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 2>became a self made millionaire at just twenty three and

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 2>more recently, Stephen has appeared as the youngest investor on

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 2>the BBC show The Dragon's Den Now. When he joined

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 2>the show, he said he hopes young people from less

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 2>privileged backgrounds like his, especially minorities who don't always see

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 2>themselves reflected in certain programs or industries, will.

0:06:57.720 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Feel enabled now.

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 2>During the interview, Stephen discussed Molly's childhood and the fact

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 2>that she had grown up with police officer parents in

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 2>the small town of hitchin Stephen said, your mom and dad,

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 2>as police officers, live very solid lives and careers. I

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 2>always wonder at a young age how much of it

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 2>is an innate desire to get more and be different

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 2>and not live the standard life, or how much is

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 2>it following the heart and seeing where it goes. Now,

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Molly responded saying she was petrified of living a very

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 2>ordinary life. And this is the first instance. When she

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 2>touched on the twenty four hour comment, this is what

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 2>she said.

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 3>I think for me, watching my parents have a very

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 3>ordinary life, it sort of petrified me at there. It

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 3>was like a bit terrifying, the thought of I don't

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 3>want to grow up in this house and when I'm

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 3>old in my rocking chat, I tell my grandkids, you know,

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 3>like I had this really ordinary life and I had

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 3>an ordinary job, I had an ordinary income like that.

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>It petrified me.

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 3>From I think around, I recognized started fitting that way

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 3>from about fifteen. I realized that the world is literally ourystan.

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 3>We can do whatever we want with the twenty four

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 3>hours in the day that we're given. So why had

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 3>am I not going to go out and meet the

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 3>most of them and do crazy things.

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Molly then went on to say that as a teenager,

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 2>she was desperate to leave her small town to move

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 2>to Manchester to kick start her influencing career. Now, her

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 2>following had started to gain traction at the time, and

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 2>she had found a management team in Manchester. So at

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 2>the age of eighteen, she dropped the news to her

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 2>parents that she found herself a flat and within a

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 2>week left their home. She said that at the time

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 2>she could barely afford her rent and was making one

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars a month of her influencing jobs, and her

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 2>rent was nine hundred pounds, so she was living paycheck

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 2>to paycheck now. This conversation then led to Stephen comparing

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 2>his experience of growing up in a small town to

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 2>her experience. Stephen said, as you look back at that

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 2>young girl in Hitchin, I'm from a small town myself

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 2>with not a lot of global dreaming going on. What

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 2>have you learned about the nature of confidence and how

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 2>it builds and how capable and powerful your potential really

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 2>is as you've climbed up. Now this is where Molly

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 2>again reference the contentious twenty four hour comment.

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 3>Here's what she said, Beyonce has the same twenty four

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 3>hours in a day that we do. And I just

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 3>think like, it's literally you're given one life and it's

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 3>down to you what you do with it, Like you

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 3>can literally go in any direction. And when I've spoken

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 3>about that before in the past, I have been slammed

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 3>a little bit with people saying, you know, like it's

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 3>easy for you to say that, you know, you've grown

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 3>up and you've not grown up in poverty, You've not

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 3>grown up, you know, with major money struggles. So if

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 3>you to sit there and say that we will have

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 3>the same twenty four hours in a day, it's not correct.

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 3>And I'm like, technically what I'm saying is correct.

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 2>We do.

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 3>So I understand that obviously we will have different backgrounds

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 3>and we're all raise in different ways, and we do

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 3>have different financial situations. But I think if you want

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 3>something enough, you can achieve it, and it just depends

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 3>to what lengths you want to go to get where

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 3>you want to be in the future. And I'll go

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 3>to any lengths, Like I've worked my absolute ass off

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 3>to get where I am now. A lot of people

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 3>don't think that and believe that, but it's true. I've

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 3>worked so so hard.

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 2>So there has been an outpouring of anger over the comments,

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.719
<v Speaker 2>with many dubbing Molly May's comments privilege for comparing her

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 2>life to that of people working comparatively more stressful, lower

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 2>paid jobs. One Twitter user road worked her ass off.

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 2>I go to do my twelve hour shift to put

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 2>a roof over mine and my son's head. I should

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 2>have thought of this, but don't think Love Island would

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 2>accept forty eight year old size fourteen single mums. Another

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 2>said she literally just went on a TV dating show

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 2>and got brand deals. I'm not sure she worked her

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 2>ass off. Meanwhile, some fans showed support for the Love

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Island star. Of course this is a stupid comment, but

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I do feel like she's been hung out to dry

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 2>a bit here. The podcast was called The Diary of

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 2>a CEO, where I think she felt the need to

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 2>say inspiring things like follow your dreams and you can

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 2>do anything. It's tone deaf, not malicious. Another person tweeted

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Savo Sullivan wrote a fantastic piece for a refinery about

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 2>this topic, and she pointed out that it's not the

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 2>first time Molly May has been subject to a Twitter uproar,

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 2>but this time it's not about her dog or the

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 2>nature of her giveaway or the fact that people cared

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 2>deeply about when her boyfriend Tommy Fury is going to

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 2>propose instead. It speaks to the fundamental flaws at the

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 2>heart of the influencer economy and the shifting ways is

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 2>we conceive work. What I loved about this article is

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 2>it pointed out that the twenty four hour comment really

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 2>spoke to the girl Boss era of twenty fourteen, and

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 2>that was when our Instagram feeds would be full of

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 2>quotes saying things like you have the same twenty four

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 2>hours as Beyonce and The article also pointed out that

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 2>there is a distinct difference between the quantifiable period of

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 2>time and how you can spend it. So, for example,

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 2>people who can afford to pay for support like childcare,

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 2>cleaners and assistants are paying not only for the support,

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 2>but for the freedom to use their time how they

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 2>say fit. So it's really difficult to compare a regular

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty two year old who may be working several jobs

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 2>to cover their rent and is cooking their own food, cleaning,

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe socializing. It's very difficult to say that they have

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 2>the same amount of time and free time to invest

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 2>in their future as an influencer who is currently on

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 2>a seven figure contract with a huge Fast Fast.

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what's crazy?

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 5>Though?

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.319
<v Speaker 2>When I heard these comments on the podcast, I did

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 2>immediately think that it's strange to me that Molly would

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 2>comment on her twenty four hours because when you watch

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 2>her YouTube, so you get the impression that she actually

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 2>doesn't do that much. So I did wonder if that

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 2>had anything to do with the upbrough people like, are

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 2>you serious. I think it definitely has added to it.

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 2>And I think what's even more awkward is the fact

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 2>that she is the creative director of a fast fashioned

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 2>brand like Pretty Little Thing, who obviously employs workers that

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 2>are living below the poverty line to create their clothes.

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.439
<v Speaker 2>So I think there are a lot of points here

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 2>that have angered a lot of people. And as one

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 2>of those Twitter commenters said, it might not have been

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 2>with malice, but it was a very tone deaf thing

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 2>for Molly to say. And I think she's in the

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.719
<v Speaker 2>position where she was elevated onto this podcast where a

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of important people go on and talk about their success,

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's a little bit of tool poppy

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 2>syndrome in the fact that she's in a position to

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 2>drag her down, and she's obviously said something that is

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 2>offensive as well.

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:02.719
<v Speaker 2>I went back and listened to the Pretty Little Thing

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 2>podcast and there was an episode which featured Molly and

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 2>it was crazy because this was probably early last year,

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 2>and she said the same quote about having twenty four

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 2>hours in a day.

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I actually think the fact.

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 2>That someone's picked it up and put it on TikTok

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 2>is the reason that there is so much anger over this,

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 2>because I don't know, it seems like TikTok can expose

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 2>these kind of quotes, but it also doesn't give a

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of the context of the interview. I don't think

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 2>there's any denying that the comment was tone deaf. However,

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 2>as you said, Amy, I think it's made to look

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot worse when it is cut up without any

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 2>of that context that Molly had made throughout the whole interview.

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And then when you.

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 2>See that isolated, you're like, what the hell, Like this

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 2>is bullshit, And especially on a platform like TikTok where

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot of woke people are on a lot of

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 2>young people that are angry about things, and I think

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:51.439
<v Speaker 2>it just snowballs from there. Well, the thing that does

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 2>annoy me a little bit is as Sophy said, this

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 2>podcast is called the Diary of a CEO, and there

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 2>are a lot of other podcasts out there that are

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 2>inspirational business podcasts. And I've listened to Gary V's podcast

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 2>numerous times and he says lots of similar things about

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, utilizing your time and you know you can

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 2>do it, and you have the opportunity just like everybody

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 2>else does. The thing is the whole twenty four hours

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 2>in a day common It really drives home the message

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 2>that if we all have the same amount of time

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 2>in the day, the only thing holding us back from

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 2>our goals is not working hard enough, which really perpetuates

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 2>the whole hustle culture philosophy, and it gives the impression

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 2>that the power to change our circumstances is in our

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 2>hands and the only thing stopping us is ourselves, which

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 2>of course isn't true for people who find themselves in

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 2>less fortunate situations. And the philosophy really is, as Refinery said,

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 2>at the heart of influencer culture, and Refinery so cleverly

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 2>pointed out that the performance of working hard is so

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 2>key to an influencer's relatability. So the article said that

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 2>influencers like Molly may try to reinforce the idea that

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 2>the graft is primarily what got them there. Yeah, because

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 2>if luck and advantages were the primary reason and no

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 2>hard work or real work was put in, then it

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 2>would be harder for us to buy into that idea

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 2>that influencers are aspirational and most importantly relatable. I think

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 2>that's so true, And I feel like in that part

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 2>of the interview, Molly had been asked about appearing on

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Love Island and sort of was questioned about what set

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 2>herself apart from the other contestants, and I feel like

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 2>she was really amped up to talk about how hard

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 2>she had worked in comparison to the Love Island contestants

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 2>and how you know they all had had the same

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 2>opportunity as her. The thing is, as you say, Kate,

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 2>she was comparing herself to the other contestants, but not

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 2>looking at the deeper issue of the fact that she

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 2>was very lucky and in a privileged position to find

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 2>herself on the show. Because you look at the people

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 2>who were cast on the show, and you can't say

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 2>that beauty standards don't play a role in who gets selected.

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, host of the CEO diary.

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Stephen Bartlet took to Twitter to defend Molly may He said,

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 2>the standard the publics whole Molly may Too is absolutely outrageous.

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Hero.

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 2>I've become very aware of the double standard successful women face.

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 2>If I interview a man, he can brag about money,

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 2>take full credit for his success, and talk about his cars.

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 2>I've had male guests say what she said and no

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 2>one cared gender issues aside. The standard we hold Molly

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 2>may Too as a twenty two year old who is

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 2>figuring out the world is absolutely outrageous. I do agree

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot with what Stephen has said here because I

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 2>do think gender does come into play, and I think

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 2>there is a lot of internalized misogyny in the way

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 2>that we view women earning a lot of money, and

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 2>we sometimes get our back up about it. And I think,

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 2>in particular with influencers, I think it's difficult because whilst

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't doubt that Molly may has worked incredibly hard

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 2>by her own standard to get where she is, I

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 2>think what constitutes hard work in the life of an

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 2>influencer seems to be very different to outsiders who work

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 2>a nine till five grind, or someone working grueling shift work.

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 2>We tend to view influencer work as easy and simple

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 2>because there are a lot of benefits and glamorous sides

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 2>to it. Well. I think that's also how they portray

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 2>it on YouTube, because often when I'm watching Molly May's YouTube,

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 2>she has in the past spoken about how she's gone

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 2>to bed really late because she's been watching movies and

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 2>getting taken away and then gotten up really late again

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 2>and not done much. And I think it's sort of also,

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 2>as you were saying before, how they portray themselves online

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 2>to remain relatable, because I have watched a lot of

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 2>YouTubers say that they normally film on their days off,

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 2>which I think is detrimental to themselves because this is

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 2>what you think everyday life is like for them, when

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 2>it may be not like that at all. They might

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 2>actually be working hard. I also think people lack sympathy

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 2>when someone is being paid incredibly well for their job.

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Now there have been reports that Molly May is being

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 2>paid a seven figure sum for her role as creative

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 2>director of Pretty Little Thing, and even in the interview

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 2>when Steven questioned Molly about what her role actually encompassed,

0:17:57.240 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 2>there was a bit of a question, even in my

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:02.199
<v Speaker 2>mind going on of war, what she actually does in

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 2>that role. I mean, let's just be honest. The comment

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 2>that she made was incredibly careless. I do wonder how

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 2>much weight all of the media coverage surrounding el Darby's

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 2>racist comments had because I noticed that a lot of

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 2>articles about Molly May then linked back to the el

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Derby controversy. And I feel like at the moment, with

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 2>it being the start of the year, it's like people

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 2>are on holidays and they're kind of looking to be

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 2>outraged by something. So well, I feel like media organizations

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 2>also know there's currency in covering these backlashes and influencer

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 2>apologies because even one of the articles I read in

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:38.400
<v Speaker 2>the Sun they said the groveling apology from Molly May,

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 2>and I noticed that that was the exact way they

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 2>led about l Darby's apology. Well, talking about that apology,

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 2>shall we get into Molly's because she said I wanted

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 2>to come back online today as normal, but I feel

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 2>like before I do, I just wanted to say this.

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 2>When I say or post anything online, it is never

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 2>with malice or ill intent. I completely appreciate that things

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.159
<v Speaker 2>can affect different people in different ways. However, I just

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 2>want to stress that I would never intend to hurt

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 2>or upset anyone by anything I say or do. I

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 2>apologize to the people that have been affected negatively or

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 2>misunderstood the meaning of what I said in the podcast.

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 2>The intention of the podcast will only ever to tell

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 2>my story and inspire from my experience. Loved You will

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 2>always I really feel like it's a.

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Bit of a nothing apology. Yeah, I tend to agree.

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it had a bit of a tone of

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry that you misunderstood and took what I said

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 2>in the wrong way. And even if that's how she feels,

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 2>and I mean, we've just been discussing that, we do

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 2>think there are elements where people have blown this tone

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 2>deaf comment out of proportion. I do think when you

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 2>are making an apology on.

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Such a big stage.

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 2>Like she is, that she did need to hold up

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 2>her hands and say my comment was tone death, I'm

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 2>going to learn from it, this is how I'm going

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 2>to move forward. Like it didn't really hit all the

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 2>right notes for me that an influence apology should. Then again,

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I think maybe she wasn't sorry because she was probably

0:19:55.600 --> 0:20:00.719
<v Speaker 2>copying so much vile hate from people online. Even Bartlett

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 2>said in his Twitter post that you know, we must

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 2>remember to be kind and reference Caroline Flax. So I

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 2>can only imagine the comments that Molly may must have

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 2>been receiving, and the fact that so many men on

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 2>this Diary of a CEO podcast said the exact same

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 2>thing and received no backlash. Maybe she didn't really feel

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 2>like apologizing. Yeah, but that's the thing I mean, I'm

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 2>saying that I totally think her comment was tone deaf,

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 2>but I don't think the reaction has matched what she

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 2>actually said.

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 6>So we have come to Victoria Park and we've just

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 6>on a little lap around the park and I actually

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 6>am feeling really good. It actually gave me a bit

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 6>of momentum.

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 3>So Princess.

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 6>Okay, Princess Victoria Park, Well, I can tell people exactly

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 6>where I was. I thought that would be dumb. They'll

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 6>come at you for that, but like I just didn't

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 6>who gives the exact location of where they.

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 5>Are we're sitting Anyways, I was.

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 6>About to say something important.

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 2>Bella Valares has denied accidentally uploading a screenshot of her

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 2>bank account to her instant story. The former A Bachelorette

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 2>contestant claims her Instagram was hacked and the account details

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 2>are not hers. Kate, can you tell us what happened? Well,

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 2>just a quick recap. On Monday show, we discussed how

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 2>a screenshot had briefly appeared on Bella's insta story showing

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 2>a bank account with more than ninety eight thousand dollars

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 2>in savings Now. The screenshot was swiftly deleted, which led

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 2>many people to believe she had accidentally uploaded the details. However,

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 2>since our episode went live on Monday, we received a

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:30.199
<v Speaker 2>message from Bella saying the following. She wrote, Hi, guys,

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 2>I've just got sent a blurb from a podcast you

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 2>put out about me and my savings account. My Instagram

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 2>was hacked and that wasn't a screenshot of my bank account.

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 2>This is why I got taken down as soon as

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 2>I regained access to my account. Your podcast has made

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 2>it out like it's something I did on purpose, and

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 2>you seem like genuinely nice people, so I'm not sure

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:50.400
<v Speaker 2>why you would go out of your way to fabricate

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 2>a whole scenario without first checking with the person.

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>There has now been.

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Articles made, and it's immensely distressing that they are making

0:21:57.520 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 2>it out like this is something I have done on purpose.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Who in their right mind would share a photo of

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 2>their savings. I'd appreciate if you rectified the situation now.

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>We responded straight.

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Away, saying we were unaware her account had been hacked

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 2>and we were sorry if we had contributed to any

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 2>distress that she was experiencing. We also went on to

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 2>explain that we used the story as a hook to

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.919
<v Speaker 2>discuss the hot topic of influencers pay, and that we

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 2>were happy to update our listeners on Friday with the

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 2>details she provided. However, Bella viewed our reply and is

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 2>yet to respond. She did, however, do an interview with Pedestrian,

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 2>where she again reiterated her Instagram was hacked and it

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 2>wasn't a screenshot of her bank account. She said, that

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 2>is why it got taken down as soon as I

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 2>regained access to my account. She went on to say

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 2>that the incident had been immensely distressing again for her,

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 2>and she's been receiving hate messages on Instagram. Bella said,

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 2>I had no control of the situation, and it's been

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 2>made out like it was done on purpose. It's just

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 2>unfortunate that people jump to conclusions and judge when they

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 2>see a media article, they don't think to take into

0:22:56.400 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 2>consideration that its third degree information that's being used, along

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 2>with biased opinions from the people talking about it or

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 2>writing about it. I understand it comes with the territory,

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:08.959
<v Speaker 2>but the hate messages shouldn't be. Didn't anyone think to themselves,

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 2>she's obviously been hacked. Who would actually willingly share their

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 2>bank details? And what kind of people would then share

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 2>that to a Facebook page without knowing the full story.

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 2>It's ridiculous and pathetic. Now what did you guys make

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 2>of all of this? I do feel for Bella, because

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 2>no one should ever be copying hate messages. However, I'm

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 2>surprised by her thought process because to me, it isn't

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.199
<v Speaker 2>my first thought, Oh, this person must have been hacked.

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 2>My first thought is wow, this person must have accidentally

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 2>uploaded their private details, especially because she didn't then write

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 2>a message saying hey guys, I've been hacked. And also,

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 2>how does she gain access to her account so quickly

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 2>to remove the side instantly? Yeah, well, that's what I

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 2>want to know, because I feel like there's different levels

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 2>of hacking, and she has been pretty vague with the

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 2>details about this hacking. So, for example, I think a

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of people have experienced being hacked by their sibling

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 2>or their friend when someone steals their phone and posts

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 2>something as a joke, which I think that this could

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 2>fall into this category. But then I feel like she's

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:13.199
<v Speaker 2>referencing that she was hacked by a third party. But

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it doesn't really match up to the

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 2>story because it would take a long time, you would

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.400
<v Speaker 2>think to regain access to your account. I mean, Sophie,

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 2>you took about a week to get back into your

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Facebook account and that wasn't even hacked. That was just

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 2>because you forgot your password. But why would you hack

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 2>some Why would you hack someone's Instagram to put up

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 2>a screenshot of a bank account? Like, is she claiming

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 2>that it's not her bank account and she claiming that

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 2>it is and someone else put it up there. No,

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 2>she's saying that this isn't her bank account. The thing

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 2>that also blows my mind is she's acting like she

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have any right of reply. But if she was hacked,

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 2>why didn't she go on and address it straight away

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 2>and say sorry, guys, my Instagram got hacked. Why does

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 2>she then have to give out interviews to pedestrian, and

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, to clear up the story, just jump on

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 2>your story and say what happened? Yeah, but why would

0:24:58.080 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 2>anyone hack someone's account?

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Upload?

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Is it meant to be embarrassing that she's only got

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 2>like ninety eight K and savings? I don't understand it

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 2>all doesn't make it seem the funny thing is it

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 2>seems like she is embarrassed, like, no, that's not my account.

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I've got way more money.

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 5>Entire Channel four news team, I'm Veronica Corningstone.

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 4>And I'm Ron Burgundy.

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 6>Go fuck yourself, san Diego.

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Leaked vision of seven News readers Rebecca Madden and Mike

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Aymore calling tennis player Novak Djokovic and asshole has gone viral.

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 2>The incident has sparked an investigation by the Seven network

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 2>to find the culprit responsible for the leak, while many

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 2>are now speculating the whole debarcle could have been an

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 2>elaborate publicity stunt amy, can you tell us more well?

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 2>The leaked vision shows Rebecca Madden and Mike Amore sitting

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 2>at the news desk getting ready to present the nightly

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 2>news bulletin. And having worked in TV news, it's very

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 2>common for newsreaders to discuss the headlines before the news

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 2>actually begins. So on Wednesday morning, the vision surfaced online

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 2>and quickly made headlines around the country. I think we

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 2>should have a list into what was said.

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 5>That talk of each is a lying, sneaky asshole, Like

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:12.360
<v Speaker 5>whatever way you look at it, it's unfortunate that everybody

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 5>else stuffed up around. That's it like to go out

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 5>when you know you COVID positive. Well I don't think

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:21.199
<v Speaker 5>he wasn't even COVID positive.

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 6>That bullshit.

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 4>Fell over his lies, which is what happens, right, Yeah,

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 4>that's what's happening.

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.959
<v Speaker 5>And then him now then ticking he didn't go to Spain.

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 4>It's just like, but I think I think he's going

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 4>to get away with it.

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 5>He is going to get away with it.

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 2>I think most fairminded people would say, look, Blakes an asshole.

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 6>Did we did they do the right thing by him?

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, don't.

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 2>That So first it was everyone's reaction to the comments.

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't surprised because, as you said, Amy, we've all

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 2>worked newsrooms before, and it's pretty common, as you said,

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 2>for the newsreaders to have a pretty open chat. I

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 2>mean I was sometimes surprised how open some of them

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 2>would be when they were miked up, particularly because vision like.

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>This can leak. But I wasn't surprised to.

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 2>All, and I really agreed with their commentary. To be honest,

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 2>I kind of liked seeing the real and raw side

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:22.120
<v Speaker 2>to them.

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:23.360
<v Speaker 1>It made me like them.

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:25.439
<v Speaker 2>I think they just said what a lot of Australians

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:27.679
<v Speaker 2>were thinking. And it was quite funny because a lot

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 2>of people seemed outraged by the swearing. But as someone

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 2>who has worked in a newsroom that's pretty regular, that's

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 2>where normal. Yeah, that's where I picked up a lot

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 2>of my bad swearing from.

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I do think a lot.

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Of people were surprised how off the cuff the comments were, because,

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 2>as we said, the general public aren't used to seeing

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 2>new newsreaders in that light because they're normally so prim

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 2>and proper on air. However, I feel like when these

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 2>reports first came out, I initially thought, oh gosh, this

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:58.679
<v Speaker 2>is going to really damage Rebecca and Mike's image, but

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 2>it really seems to have done the opposite if you

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 2>look online. So Twitter was ablaze with praise for the pair.

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 2>So author and broadcaster Justin Smith wrote yesterday, I thought

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Mike Amore and Rebecca Madden were professionals with integrity. Today,

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:13.719
<v Speaker 2>I feel exactly the same, except I like them just

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 2>that little bit more. Writer Jess Maguire tweeted that seven

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 2>News footage where the host called Novak Djokovic a lying,

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 2>sneaking asshole is a delight and honestly, I'd love nightly

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 2>news shows where hosts spoke so frankly, so Amy, What

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:29.360
<v Speaker 2>did you make of the initial reporting of the leaked division? Well,

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 2>to be honest, I was a little bit annoyed by

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 2>the initial coverage because a lot of the headlines only

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 2>named Rebecca Madden, and they were headlines like Rebecca and

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Madden calls Novak Djokovic a sneaky little asshole, and I thought,

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 2>oh my gosh, she's gonna get absolutely crucified at work

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 2>and also by.

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>The general public.

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 2>And it did really annoy me that it seemed to be, again,

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the media, we're picking on the woman in this instance,

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 2>just playing devil's advocate. Do you think that that's because

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 2>she does have a higher profile nationally than Mike Amoor.

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Because she was on the footy show. I don't think so.

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 2>I think Mike Aimore is a very well respected journalist

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 2>as well, and I think it would have been just

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 2>as shocking for them to include him in the headline.

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 2>According to media reports, Seven are furious about this league

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 2>and have said that the vision was illegally obtained. Amy,

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 2>what are they putting that down to Well. Seven's director

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 2>of News and Public Affairs, Craig McPherson described the league

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 2>as cowardly and said it was in breach of the

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Victorian listening devices legislation. He also said the perpetrator would

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 2>be accordingly dealt with when found. I find this all

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 2>very interesting because it seems to be a complete backflip

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.719
<v Speaker 2>to the way Seven handled the issue with their reporter

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Georgia love So, the former bachelorette was embroiled in a

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 2>racist Instagram story scandal and at the time there were

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 2>emails leaked between her and her co worker Nathan Templeton.

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 2>And it's not like Seven came out and said that

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 2>this is disgusting or anything. They stayed quiet on the matter.

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 2>So I wonder what the change of heart is all about. Okay,

0:29:57.840 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 2>as you mentioned, it's not the first leak at the

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 2>seven Melbourne newsroom. It seems to be happening to Seven

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Melbourne time and time again, because in February twenty nineteen,

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 2>there were several emails from the newsroom that were leaked,

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 2>which many media networks said revealed that the seven News

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 2>office had a mean girl's culture. So I don't know

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 2>if you guys remember this, but one of the emails

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 2>in question was from executive news producer Lynn Scrivens, and

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 2>it said twenty eighteen was, without doubt.

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Been the year of the women.

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Around the world, women are standing up for themselves, being

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 2>taken seriously, getting more opportunities. Yet here in the seven

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 2>newsroom it seems we are still a bit behind the times.

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 2>The bitching and backstabbing. I'm so done with it, all

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 2>of us. I'm sure have been guilty of having a

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 2>bitch about a colleague. Enough already, Let's start supporting each

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 2>other as women in an industry dominated by men. People

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 2>who spend spare time at work looking for stories, not

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 2>gossiping or online shopping will do well in twenty nineteen.

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>And what I find interesting.

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Is it is clear that these email leaks came from

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 2>somebody within the Seven network where it's come out now,

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 2>the leak of this vision actually came from an outsider,

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 2>So maybe that's why Seven are now pushing to expose

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 2>who did it, so it takes the heat off the network.

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like.

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 2>They're internally dealing with the other email leagues, but as

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 2>you said, this is a third party, so they're putting

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 2>them out to dry basically, well, I think they want

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 2>to make it clear that it wasn't somebody at the

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 2>seven network who actually leaked it. So initially there were

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 2>multiple reports saying that this must have been a disgruntled

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 2>seven employee. However, it's come out now that the blame

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 2>has been put on a captioning service which is believed

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 2>to be responsible for the leak. So the company has

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 2>access to the nightly news feed and then they add

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 2>the captions for people to read. So The Australian has

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 2>reported that the captioning company is AI Media, who have

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 2>launched their own investigation into the leak, and it's understood

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 2>they're currently interviewing staff and conducting extensive IT networking traces

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:52.959
<v Speaker 2>and it's thought that once the cultport has identified, the

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 2>incident will then be reported to police.

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>So what's really fascinating is it was actually the.

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Time stamp in the right hand corner which cleared seven staff.

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 2>So this time stamp doesn't appear on internal seven video outputs.

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 2>So that's why I'm assuming Seven have come out in

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 2>such a strong way to say, you know, we're gonna

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 2>find this person because it was clear it's not a

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 2>seven staffer. Well, the controversy actually ended up being a

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 2>ratings win for Seven on Wednesday night, forty thousand extra viewers.

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Then the previous night tuned in to watch the bulletin

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 2>affronted by Rebecca and Mike, and this has led many

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 2>to speculate whether the leak was actually a publicity stunt.

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 2>What do you guys think? I don't think there's any

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 2>way that Seven would actually allow this to be put out.

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 2>I think they've been involved in so many scandals recently

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 2>that it's just not a good look for the network.

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 2>I think it's ended out being a good move personally

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 2>for the reporters. However, it doesn't reflect well on the

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 2>network as a whole. Well, the thing is, I think

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 2>the reason why so many people think that it could

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 2>be a publicity stunt is the fact that Rebecca Madden

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 2>has only just returned to the seven network from nine,

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 2>so she was at nine for five and a half years,

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 2>and she only returned in early January, so now everybody

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 2>knows she's back at seven after this vision is leaked,

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 2>and because the reception from the public has been so positive,

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 2>that's obviously led people to speculating. But I agree with you, Kay,

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 2>I think there is no way the seven network would

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 2>air something like this because they could never have predicted

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 2>that the public response would be this way. Well, that

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 2>being said, I don't think that would have been so

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 2>difficult to predict.

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>At the moment.

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Online there's been so much backlash towards Novak Djokovic, and

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 2>the general consensus is that he is a complete asshole.

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 2>So I feel like putting out that sort of content

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 2>where the anchors are speaking the way that we all speak,

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 2>They're having a great chat, they're sounding like everyday people

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 2>you can get along with. I can see why people

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 2>would think this is leak.

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I can see it.

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 2>But the whole thing with news is that journalists are

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 2>meant to be unbiased and they're not meant to push

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 2>their own opinion in the story. And I think a

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of people were like, oh, well, why would I

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 2>listen to you because you're obviously coming from your own agenda,

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 2>and I don't think that's good from a.

0:33:57.800 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 1>News perspective at all.

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think I think that's all we've got time

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 2>for today. Thank you so much for joining us for

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 2>another episode of Outspoken. If you did like the show,

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 2>please go and rate us five stars and also remember

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 2>to follow us on Instagram at Outspoken the Podcast. We're

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 2>also on TikTok at Outspoken Underscore the underscore podcasting. Go

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:18.839
<v Speaker 2>and join in the conversations at our Facebook community, which

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:22.240
<v Speaker 2>is Outspoken the Podcast Community.