1 00:00:00,640 --> 00:00:03,480 Speaker 1: Now, as we know, national security is at the four 2 00:00:03,600 --> 00:00:06,680 Speaker 1: in Australia right now. I think we're right around the world. 3 00:00:06,720 --> 00:00:08,840 Speaker 1: It's something that we're all talking about. But we spoke 4 00:00:08,840 --> 00:00:11,600 Speaker 1: to the Prime Minister Scott Morrison on the show on 5 00:00:11,800 --> 00:00:15,640 Speaker 1: Friday about his rhetoric around China. Then over the weekend 6 00:00:15,760 --> 00:00:19,240 Speaker 1: it was reported that the Chinese Navy had used military 7 00:00:19,280 --> 00:00:23,280 Speaker 1: grade laser to attack a Royal Australian Air Force plane. 8 00:00:23,400 --> 00:00:26,160 Speaker 1: Now joining me on the line is doctor John Coyne. 9 00:00:26,239 --> 00:00:30,400 Speaker 1: He's the head of the Northern Australia Strategic Policy Institute. 10 00:00:30,600 --> 00:00:31,440 Speaker 1: Good morning to you. 11 00:00:31,440 --> 00:00:33,640 Speaker 2: John, Good morning Katie. 12 00:00:33,960 --> 00:00:36,159 Speaker 1: Lovely to have you on the show. Now, John, I 13 00:00:36,200 --> 00:00:40,640 Speaker 1: know that that angry Australian Department of Defense officials have 14 00:00:40,760 --> 00:00:44,040 Speaker 1: seen to please explain. Note it's been reported to counterparts 15 00:00:44,040 --> 00:00:47,640 Speaker 1: in Beijing after the Chinese Navy used allegedly this military 16 00:00:47,680 --> 00:00:51,600 Speaker 1: grade laser to attack a Royal Australian Air Force plane. 17 00:00:51,920 --> 00:00:55,000 Speaker 1: The incident's become a real political flashpoint, I think. But 18 00:00:55,080 --> 00:00:58,160 Speaker 1: what does it mean for everyday Assie's listening to us 19 00:00:58,160 --> 00:00:58,680 Speaker 1: this morning? 20 00:01:00,200 --> 00:01:03,200 Speaker 2: Okay, Look, first off, I think that there's some the 21 00:01:03,320 --> 00:01:06,040 Speaker 2: terminology needs a little bit of explanation, So a lot 22 00:01:06,080 --> 00:01:07,800 Speaker 2: of people are going, you know, are we talking about 23 00:01:07,840 --> 00:01:11,520 Speaker 2: a laser pointer? Are we talking about you know, someone 24 00:01:11,560 --> 00:01:13,760 Speaker 2: shining a torch? And I've seen some of these things 25 00:01:13,760 --> 00:01:17,200 Speaker 2: come out on Twitter. What we're talking about here is 26 00:01:17,240 --> 00:01:23,240 Speaker 2: a laser that's used for weapon systems to identify a target. 27 00:01:23,319 --> 00:01:26,160 Speaker 2: So that could either be for a missile or alternatively 28 00:01:27,800 --> 00:01:29,959 Speaker 2: like a thirty milk cannon, so like a big cannon 29 00:01:30,040 --> 00:01:34,880 Speaker 2: to shoot down incoming aircraft. So that's a really aggressive act. 30 00:01:34,920 --> 00:01:37,400 Speaker 2: Australia has never done that in any of the times 31 00:01:37,400 --> 00:01:41,000 Speaker 2: that it's done. It's sailed through the South China Sea. 32 00:01:41,760 --> 00:01:48,480 Speaker 2: The Chinese People's Liberation Navy actually called the PLA Navy. 33 00:01:48,640 --> 00:01:50,840 Speaker 2: It's done this before in the South China Sea. So 34 00:01:51,240 --> 00:01:53,920 Speaker 2: we're talking about very very significant. Now there's lots of 35 00:01:53,960 --> 00:01:57,560 Speaker 2: people saying, well, the picture shows our aircraft targeting. The 36 00:01:58,120 --> 00:02:02,160 Speaker 2: picture shows a picture that taken somewhere between four kilometers 37 00:02:02,200 --> 00:02:06,080 Speaker 2: and seven kilometers away from that warship, so you know 38 00:02:06,360 --> 00:02:08,680 Speaker 2: they were well away. They were doing what they normally do, 39 00:02:08,760 --> 00:02:11,640 Speaker 2: the Australian Air Force, which is trying to identify as 40 00:02:11,680 --> 00:02:15,040 Speaker 2: ship and taking photos and images of it. This is 41 00:02:15,080 --> 00:02:18,440 Speaker 2: an extraordinary turn of events. 42 00:02:19,200 --> 00:02:21,480 Speaker 1: Wow, I mean, that's quite frightening, I guess for some 43 00:02:21,520 --> 00:02:23,720 Speaker 1: of us to hear, because when you actually look at this, 44 00:02:24,000 --> 00:02:26,239 Speaker 1: it's not that far away from the Northern Territory. 45 00:02:27,800 --> 00:02:31,280 Speaker 2: Well, that's exactly right. Now. You know, one of the 46 00:02:31,280 --> 00:02:35,600 Speaker 2: things I love about territories is increasing they understand how 47 00:02:35,639 --> 00:02:40,079 Speaker 2: strategically important they are in world politics. Came in terms 48 00:02:40,120 --> 00:02:42,960 Speaker 2: of geography. So you know, people say down here in camera, 49 00:02:43,040 --> 00:02:47,040 Speaker 2: they're always talking about strategic geography. People in the territory 50 00:02:47,120 --> 00:02:50,040 Speaker 2: live in strategic geography and know they're part of the region, 51 00:02:50,919 --> 00:02:52,800 Speaker 2: not a world away from it. So I think this 52 00:02:52,960 --> 00:02:55,440 Speaker 2: is the first part of it. So what we're seeing 53 00:02:55,480 --> 00:02:58,720 Speaker 2: here is probably the first of what will be many, many, 54 00:02:58,760 --> 00:03:04,400 Speaker 2: many more incidents. An empowered Chinese Communist Party will increasingly 55 00:03:04,480 --> 00:03:06,640 Speaker 2: sell warships close to Australian waters. 56 00:03:07,320 --> 00:03:10,480 Speaker 1: Yeah, and John, for us, you know, selling those Chinese 57 00:03:10,560 --> 00:03:14,799 Speaker 1: warships closer to Australian waters ultimately means a bit closer 58 00:03:14,960 --> 00:03:16,560 Speaker 1: to the territory, doesn't it. 59 00:03:17,840 --> 00:03:20,520 Speaker 2: Well, that's exactly right, and I think you know, the 60 00:03:20,560 --> 00:03:24,960 Speaker 2: waters around the territory important the Chinese were sending. So 61 00:03:24,960 --> 00:03:28,640 Speaker 2: you know, part of this discussion is the Chinese Communist 62 00:03:28,720 --> 00:03:31,519 Speaker 2: Party were sending a supply ship to Tonga. Yes they were, 63 00:03:31,560 --> 00:03:36,520 Speaker 2: but they had accompanied with if a warship, so it 64 00:03:36,560 --> 00:03:38,880 Speaker 2: wasn't just a heavy landing craft. There was a warship 65 00:03:39,440 --> 00:03:42,200 Speaker 2: and they were Yes, they were in international waters, but 66 00:03:42,240 --> 00:03:46,480 Speaker 2: they were very very close to our easy so you know, yes, 67 00:03:46,640 --> 00:03:50,640 Speaker 2: they were right up there. And so once again, just 68 00:03:50,760 --> 00:03:54,680 Speaker 2: like during the Cold War, you know those waters around 69 00:03:54,800 --> 00:03:59,160 Speaker 2: Northern Australia are going to be increasingly important. They're important 70 00:03:59,200 --> 00:04:01,840 Speaker 2: for the US, they're important to the Japanese, and they're 71 00:04:01,880 --> 00:04:03,200 Speaker 2: important for the Chinese. 72 00:04:03,720 --> 00:04:06,040 Speaker 1: And John, I guess that's not lost on us. Like 73 00:04:06,080 --> 00:04:07,880 Speaker 1: you'd said just a couple of moments ago, we in 74 00:04:07,920 --> 00:04:12,480 Speaker 1: the Northern Territory know that we're strategically and geographically important. 75 00:04:12,560 --> 00:04:14,640 Speaker 1: I guess the other part of it is that we 76 00:04:14,720 --> 00:04:17,520 Speaker 1: also know we're quite vulnerable. You know, on the weekend 77 00:04:18,040 --> 00:04:21,760 Speaker 1: we commemorated the eightieth anniversary of the bombing of Darwin, 78 00:04:22,400 --> 00:04:24,760 Speaker 1: So we know that we are a vulnerable place in 79 00:04:24,800 --> 00:04:28,160 Speaker 1: that sense. But we also know that the federal government 80 00:04:28,240 --> 00:04:32,680 Speaker 1: continues to announce the ball string of defense infrastructure and 81 00:04:32,760 --> 00:04:34,080 Speaker 1: that kind of thing in the territory. 82 00:04:34,320 --> 00:04:38,000 Speaker 2: So what does it all mean for us? Look, you know, 83 00:04:38,080 --> 00:04:39,720 Speaker 2: what I want to put it this one. I think 84 00:04:39,720 --> 00:04:43,040 Speaker 2: I've said this to you before, which is so I 85 00:04:43,200 --> 00:04:46,120 Speaker 2: was in high school in the eighties, yeap, giving away 86 00:04:46,200 --> 00:04:50,440 Speaker 2: my age here, But at that time, we feared thermonuclear war, 87 00:04:50,520 --> 00:04:53,839 Speaker 2: which is what you call an existential threat to humanity. 88 00:04:53,880 --> 00:04:55,479 Speaker 2: You know, what we could have had is a big 89 00:04:55,600 --> 00:04:59,280 Speaker 2: thermonuclear war, and it could have ended humanity. So as 90 00:04:59,320 --> 00:05:01,960 Speaker 2: a young I was really concerned about this. There were 91 00:05:02,120 --> 00:05:06,080 Speaker 2: movies and all sorts of things. Well fast forward. Back then, 92 00:05:06,080 --> 00:05:07,840 Speaker 2: we had lots of rules of the road to prevent that. 93 00:05:08,440 --> 00:05:11,159 Speaker 2: I don't think we're facing today a thermo nuclear war, 94 00:05:11,600 --> 00:05:16,440 Speaker 2: but we're facing a degree of strategic uncertainty that we 95 00:05:16,520 --> 00:05:20,160 Speaker 2: haven't faced for several decades, and that is playing out 96 00:05:20,200 --> 00:05:22,559 Speaker 2: all over the world, and there's very few rule books 97 00:05:22,600 --> 00:05:25,440 Speaker 2: for so you know, who would have known. So if 98 00:05:25,480 --> 00:05:27,280 Speaker 2: we were in nineteen ninety five or even the year 99 00:05:27,360 --> 00:05:30,360 Speaker 2: two thousand, that we'd been looking at a possible Russian 100 00:05:30,440 --> 00:05:34,520 Speaker 2: invasion of Ukraine, you know that we'd see seeing Chinese 101 00:05:35,680 --> 00:05:40,960 Speaker 2: called economic punishment to Australian exports, that we'd see this 102 00:05:41,120 --> 00:05:45,279 Speaker 2: sort of you know, aircraft being lasered by Chinese warships. 103 00:05:45,320 --> 00:05:47,960 Speaker 2: So you know, we're in a really uncertain period of 104 00:05:48,040 --> 00:05:51,560 Speaker 2: time where there's less warning and less rule books, so 105 00:05:51,680 --> 00:05:52,839 Speaker 2: we need to be more prepared. 106 00:05:53,360 --> 00:05:55,240 Speaker 1: And I suppose the other part of it as well, 107 00:05:55,320 --> 00:05:57,400 Speaker 1: John is you know, I noticed I interviewed the Prime 108 00:05:57,440 --> 00:06:01,240 Speaker 1: Minister on Friday and we spoke about about the relationship 109 00:06:01,279 --> 00:06:02,960 Speaker 1: with China and he was very keen to sort of 110 00:06:03,000 --> 00:06:07,200 Speaker 1: put that wedge between the coalition government and a possible 111 00:06:07,279 --> 00:06:10,920 Speaker 1: labor government. But I would imagine that no matter what 112 00:06:11,080 --> 00:06:12,960 Speaker 1: side of politics you sit on, you want to make 113 00:06:13,040 --> 00:06:16,280 Speaker 1: sure that that first and foremost you are trying to 114 00:06:16,520 --> 00:06:19,080 Speaker 1: you know, trying to protect and look after Australians. 115 00:06:20,360 --> 00:06:23,840 Speaker 2: Well, you know what I guess. First off, I'll leave 116 00:06:23,839 --> 00:06:26,000 Speaker 2: the politics to the politician, but I will say this 117 00:06:26,240 --> 00:06:29,200 Speaker 2: is that in a general sense, we are very fortunate 118 00:06:29,279 --> 00:06:33,800 Speaker 2: in Australia that we have bipartisan support of defense and 119 00:06:33,920 --> 00:06:38,400 Speaker 2: national security. Now, sometimes the delivery of that is divergent 120 00:06:38,480 --> 00:06:41,440 Speaker 2: between the party, So the delivering on you know, the 121 00:06:42,880 --> 00:06:45,920 Speaker 2: declared policy, the difference between that and what actually happens 122 00:06:46,000 --> 00:06:50,680 Speaker 2: is somewhat different. But certainly we are seeing a level 123 00:06:50,720 --> 00:06:54,120 Speaker 2: of bipartisanship and we're seeing there's concerns on both sides 124 00:06:54,160 --> 00:06:56,560 Speaker 2: the politics of what we're facing. And so you know, 125 00:06:57,000 --> 00:06:59,200 Speaker 2: if the question that you're asking me is, you know, 126 00:06:59,320 --> 00:07:02,040 Speaker 2: are we likely if there's a change of government, a 127 00:07:02,160 --> 00:07:06,680 Speaker 2: big change in defense posture or strategic certainty? I don't 128 00:07:06,720 --> 00:07:09,600 Speaker 2: think so. I think that, you know, pessimistically, and I'm 129 00:07:09,600 --> 00:07:12,600 Speaker 2: an old intelligence person, so you know, my whole life's 130 00:07:12,600 --> 00:07:15,040 Speaker 2: about being cynical and pessimistic. I think we say at 131 00:07:15,120 --> 00:07:19,080 Speaker 2: least at least a decade of uncertainty to come. Wow. 132 00:07:19,360 --> 00:07:21,640 Speaker 1: And then you touched on this just a moment ago, 133 00:07:21,680 --> 00:07:23,520 Speaker 1: and I mean, we won't go too deep into it, 134 00:07:23,680 --> 00:07:26,960 Speaker 1: but we know that the situation with Russia and the 135 00:07:27,120 --> 00:07:30,040 Speaker 1: Ukraine at the moment, you know this morning, even it's 136 00:07:30,480 --> 00:07:33,600 Speaker 1: it's looking even more uncertain than it was I suppose yesterday. 137 00:07:33,800 --> 00:07:35,840 Speaker 1: What does that all mean for the rest of us? 138 00:07:37,880 --> 00:07:40,800 Speaker 2: Look what it means is in you know, it's starting 139 00:07:40,840 --> 00:07:44,720 Speaker 2: with the Obama regime with the Americans. The Americans under 140 00:07:44,760 --> 00:07:47,320 Speaker 2: Obama put lots of what they call red lines out 141 00:07:47,360 --> 00:07:49,000 Speaker 2: there and they said, if you cross this red line. 142 00:07:49,040 --> 00:07:50,640 Speaker 2: So one was given the Seria back in the day, 143 00:07:50,640 --> 00:07:54,960 Speaker 2: and it's like, if you use chemical weapons, that's the 144 00:07:55,040 --> 00:07:57,520 Speaker 2: red line, and we'll take action. Against you, and what 145 00:07:57,680 --> 00:08:01,560 Speaker 2: happened on numerous occasions is that the US stepped back 146 00:08:01,600 --> 00:08:04,679 Speaker 2: from those red lines, never responded. So what we're seeing 147 00:08:04,720 --> 00:08:10,920 Speaker 2: here is very much a Russia empowered by Putent trying 148 00:08:11,000 --> 00:08:13,040 Speaker 2: to push up and seeing what he can get away with. Now. 149 00:08:13,080 --> 00:08:16,880 Speaker 2: Whether or not he invade Ukraine remains to be seen, 150 00:08:17,680 --> 00:08:20,640 Speaker 2: but he is certainly pushing all of those redlines right now. 151 00:08:21,520 --> 00:08:24,920 Speaker 1: Well, doctor John Coyne, it is always interesting to catch 152 00:08:25,000 --> 00:08:27,640 Speaker 1: up with you. I find our discussions fascinating and really 153 00:08:27,680 --> 00:08:28,640 Speaker 1: appreciate your time. 154 00:08:29,840 --> 00:08:30,800 Speaker 2: Thank Katie, talk to you soon. 155 00:08:30,880 --> 00:08:31,160 Speaker 1: Thank you,