1 00:00:02,320 --> 00:00:09,920 Speaker 1: The sure report the Jackson family. That Jackson family gathered 2 00:00:09,920 --> 00:00:12,360 Speaker 1: in Los Angeles the other day for a private screening 3 00:00:12,400 --> 00:00:15,560 Speaker 1: of the upcoming movie about Michael Jackson. Inside has thought 4 00:00:15,560 --> 00:00:18,200 Speaker 1: it'd be a fairly poignant kind of family moment, but 5 00:00:18,200 --> 00:00:24,079 Speaker 1: apparently it exploded into a family confrontation, exposing long simmering 6 00:00:24,160 --> 00:00:26,920 Speaker 1: tensions over the King of Pop's legacy. Oh, to have 7 00:00:27,000 --> 00:00:29,400 Speaker 1: been a fly on the wall now, I really want 8 00:00:29,440 --> 00:00:32,440 Speaker 1: to see about Popcorn. More than sixty members of the 9 00:00:32,479 --> 00:00:35,440 Speaker 1: Jackson clan packed into the showing of Michael. It started 10 00:00:35,479 --> 00:00:41,839 Speaker 1: well until Janet Jackson evidently began dissecting it and criticizing 11 00:00:41,840 --> 00:00:45,319 Speaker 1: everything from the performances to the makeup. Oh, she had 12 00:00:45,320 --> 00:00:49,760 Speaker 1: to be starting something. Insideer, say Mama, Say Mama, Sam 13 00:00:50,960 --> 00:00:54,720 Speaker 1: inside to say. Jermaine Jackson fought back, telling her she 14 00:00:54,960 --> 00:00:57,360 Speaker 1: was just jealous. Get on the wave, he said, Get 15 00:00:57,400 --> 00:01:00,600 Speaker 1: on the wave. Apparently we will get to see the 16 00:01:00,640 --> 00:01:04,120 Speaker 1: film without the family fireworks when it opens on the 17 00:01:04,120 --> 00:01:06,959 Speaker 1: twenty third of next month. For to it, what did 18 00:01:07,040 --> 00:01:12,399 Speaker 1: LaToya say? I don't know if Latoya's face moves enough 19 00:01:12,440 --> 00:01:14,440 Speaker 1: for her to speak at all. To be fair, I 20 00:01:14,480 --> 00:01:17,679 Speaker 1: don't think she's said anything since twenty sixteen. She's the 21 00:01:17,680 --> 00:01:23,200 Speaker 1: weird one. Yeah, so they say, Perth raised filmmaker James One. 22 00:01:23,319 --> 00:01:25,440 Speaker 1: You know James here and his mate Lee Wenell made 23 00:01:25,440 --> 00:01:27,840 Speaker 1: the Sore films. Then he created the Conjuring movies, and 24 00:01:27,880 --> 00:01:30,759 Speaker 1: he did one of The Fast and the Furious and Aquaman. 25 00:01:31,040 --> 00:01:34,319 Speaker 1: He done good, done good. And now he's just signed 26 00:01:34,319 --> 00:01:38,320 Speaker 1: on to direct and produce an English language reimagining of 27 00:01:38,360 --> 00:01:41,840 Speaker 1: the hit Korean movie The Gangster, The Cop, The Devil. 28 00:01:42,040 --> 00:01:44,199 Speaker 1: The guy who wrote a fair few of the John 29 00:01:44,240 --> 00:01:46,800 Speaker 1: Wick movies is writing the screenplay, so it sounds like 30 00:01:46,800 --> 00:01:50,200 Speaker 1: a pretty good pedigree. It looks like Billie Eilish is 31 00:01:50,240 --> 00:01:54,680 Speaker 1: set to make her cinematic big film acting debut. Is 32 00:01:54,720 --> 00:01:58,560 Speaker 1: she willing to sneak out again now after the incidents? 33 00:01:58,680 --> 00:02:02,040 Speaker 1: Yes at the Grammys. The twenty four year old Grammy 34 00:02:02,080 --> 00:02:04,600 Speaker 1: winner is in advanced talks to take the lead in 35 00:02:04,640 --> 00:02:09,400 Speaker 1: an adaptation of Sylvia Plath's nineteen sixty three novel The 36 00:02:09,480 --> 00:02:12,320 Speaker 1: bel Jar. She was fairly dark. Sylvia Plath should be 37 00:02:12,360 --> 00:02:13,880 Speaker 1: a good fit. And I don't mean that in a 38 00:02:14,000 --> 00:02:17,800 Speaker 1: bad way. By the way, there've been several others attached 39 00:02:17,840 --> 00:02:21,000 Speaker 1: to different versions of this book. Adaptation in past iterations. 40 00:02:21,080 --> 00:02:25,079 Speaker 1: Stars who've Nellie made it include Julia Stiles, Kirsten Dunst 41 00:02:25,200 --> 00:02:28,440 Speaker 1: and Dakota Fanning. It'd be a It's a semi ord 42 00:02:28,600 --> 00:02:33,160 Speaker 1: biographical story, and I would be keen to see that, 43 00:02:33,440 --> 00:02:35,919 Speaker 1: and I think Billie Eilish could be good, and I 44 00:02:35,960 --> 00:02:40,520 Speaker 1: am so pleased to see that. After a sixteen year 45 00:02:40,600 --> 00:02:45,640 Speaker 1: long legal dispute, sanity has finally prevailed and Katy Perry 46 00:02:45,760 --> 00:02:49,480 Speaker 1: has won her trademark fight with Katy Perry. Katie with 47 00:02:49,560 --> 00:02:53,640 Speaker 1: an Ie Perry is an Australian fashion designer. In two 48 00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:56,680 Speaker 1: thousand and seven, she tried to trademark her name for 49 00:02:56,720 --> 00:02:59,239 Speaker 1: her business. She'd never heard of the singer. It was 50 00:02:59,280 --> 00:03:02,160 Speaker 1: shortly after that the release of Perry's huge debut single 51 00:03:02,200 --> 00:03:05,840 Speaker 1: I Kissed a Girl. Then, when Katie with a Y Perry, 52 00:03:05,960 --> 00:03:08,960 Speaker 1: the singer toured Australia in two thousand and nine, she 53 00:03:09,120 --> 00:03:13,960 Speaker 1: created an online store selling official merchandise. Thus began the 54 00:03:14,080 --> 00:03:17,799 Speaker 1: lengthy legal battle when the singer Katie filed a notice 55 00:03:17,840 --> 00:03:21,880 Speaker 1: of opposition to the registration for the Katie Designer's trademark 56 00:03:22,080 --> 00:03:25,600 Speaker 1: and allegedly sent cease and desist letters to designer Katie. 57 00:03:25,639 --> 00:03:28,480 Speaker 1: I've confused myself. Now, this has gone back and forth 58 00:03:28,520 --> 00:03:31,360 Speaker 1: over the years, with both parties suing each other, but 59 00:03:31,600 --> 00:03:36,760 Speaker 1: finally yesterday, Designer Katie came out on top, with three 60 00:03:36,960 --> 00:03:41,600 Speaker 1: of five High Court judges siding with her. The ruling 61 00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:45,680 Speaker 1: means Designer Katie's trademark can remain in place, and she 62 00:03:45,800 --> 00:03:48,640 Speaker 1: wrote on her website that the decision was not just 63 00:03:48,720 --> 00:03:52,320 Speaker 1: about a name, but about protecting small business in Australia 64 00:03:52,560 --> 00:03:54,760 Speaker 1: and standing up for what is right. Who got the 65 00:03:54,760 --> 00:03:56,920 Speaker 1: eye of the tiger? Now Katie with the wy hey, 66 00:03:58,040 --> 00:03:58,600 Speaker 1: I'm confused.