WEBVTT - 'Finfluencers' At War

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.519
<v Speaker 1>This is Outspoken. The podcast is not afraid to say

0:00:03.720 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you're thinking. Our names are Amy Kate and

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Sophie Torba. We're identical triplets, but we often don't have

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>identical opinions, so sometimes things can get heated. Outspoken covers

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>all things reality TV, influencers, entertainment and issues facing women.

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 2>That is so fetch Thank you.

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to another episode of Outspoken. It's a very

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>happy Monday here as it's a public holiday in South Australia.

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry for those states that are missing out. We're

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously pre recording this episode because when you're listening to this,

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>Sophie will be on holiday in Marion Bay with their

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>in laws.

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>We're spending a week there, which I mean I'm feeling

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a bit a bit funny about because i haven't had

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a week off in so long.

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:51.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I will be bringing my laptop with me, Amy mind you, Yeah,

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I know, because I'm going to be holding down the

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>fort Hula Media by myself.

0:00:57.880 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Does that mean gone? Does that mean it's just going

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 2>to be your me doing the podcast.

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to bring a microphone with me, so I

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>mean it gives me something to do because apparently there

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>is a sweet fa to do with Marion Bay. I

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>was going to say, because I mean, I've lived in

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>South Australia my whole life except the year in Melbourne,

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and I've never even heard of Marion Bay or anything

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 1>to do with.

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 2>What you do there. It's nearly your peninsula.

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Apparently there's a big beautiful national park there. Apparently Brandon

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is going to teach me how to use my camera

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that you got me for Christmas. So we're also going

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:30.559
<v Speaker 1>to have a Christmas in.

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 2>June night so that should be fun. Wow. Okay, well

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 2>what are you going to do without me? Amy?

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And Oh I'm just going to get shit. I'm just

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>going to get a lot of work done. I'm actually

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of looking forward to it a little bit because

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>oh thanks, Well, no, like I'll miss you. Maybe we

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>can have some quality time to maybe just think you

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>guys need it. Yeah, well, Amy, you have a colleague

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that's gone viral on tiktop. Yeah so a former colleague.

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's not Sophie. No, no, it's quite hilarious. One

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of my friends messaged me a TikTok video and it's

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>over Channel seven reporter doing a report down in the snow,

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>so he was doing a bit of a weather report.

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 2>And it's so humorous.

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Because I met him when I was on my cadet

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>ship and he didn't get the cadet ship. He actually

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>got beaten out, but he did producing work at seven

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>And I was really surprised by this because he is

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a nice looking guy. I do remember that there will

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>quite chatter about him because you know, he was pretty

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>good looking. Yeah, so he does post some modeling type

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 1>photos on his Instagram.

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 2>And the interesting thing is he is such a hard worker.

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>He's been slogging his guts out working at Sunrise, doing

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff and trying to get his foot in

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the door for a full time reporting job. And what's

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>happened is a young girl has been watching the news

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 1>randomly and she's discovered him reporting on the weather and

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>she has gone to her TikTok and posted a video

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of him zooming up with this dreamy music and said

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone needs to start watching the news.

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 2>This clip has been viewed nearly half a million times.

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I can just imagine this happening with us back in

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the day, because Dad used to watch the news like

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>literally NonStop. It would be ten news than seven today tonight.

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I could imagine seeing some hot person on there and

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you're enjoying the eye canny back in the day.

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I shouldn't say.

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>It's oh, Matt dor Matt Doran. He was a reason

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to watch the news as well. If TikTok was around

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>then I feel like he would have featured heavily on there.

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I do remember we were so disappointed because we all

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>started working at Channel ten rolling the auto Q and

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>doing a bit of the weather script and I think

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>he was either there for like five minutes whilst we

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>were there and then left to Melbourne. I remember we

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>were all devastated. Well, this guy, he has been featured

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Daily Mail. His Instagram following last time I looked,

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it's gone up by about seven thousand, and I've heard

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that he might be now getting a full time job

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>because of this.

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Is that not the power of TikTok?

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Though? This guy's been slogging his guts out for like

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>six years in the background and now he's featured once

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok and that's it.

0:03:57.600 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Good on him? I know.

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually really happy for looking at it from the

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>other perspective. Can you imagine if some guy started like

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of perving on some weather presenter and it just

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>went off and then they got it.

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh, why do you think some weather presenters. I was

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 2>just thinking about Beg Judd.

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>No, not Beg Judd, but like there is somebody she

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 1>she she got exposure from wearing her red dress. So

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I suppose it's kind of a similar situation where she's

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>been spotted by looking gorgeous. So the television industry is

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>usually run by old men who usually pick out young

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>women that they have the hotspot or that are attractive.

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, I'm calling it. I think I should

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>become a news director because I spotted this guy's potential

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>five years ago.

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 2>I said he would make a.

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Great reporter on the news. I was shocked he didn't

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>get the Sydney gig, and here he is now starring

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>all across the Daily Mail.

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 3>Regina George is flawless.

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>She has too Fendi press and it's not as.

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 3>I hear her hare's insured for ten thousand dollars.

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>A new breed of influencer is dominating the social media world.

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>Finance influencers, known as influencers, are becoming a hot commodity

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>for fine financial brands wanting exposure. However, concerns have been

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>raised over the unlicensed advice being provided by unqualified influencers.

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>This week, a row between license and unlicensed Australian finance

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 1>influences reached fever pitch when two upcoming unlicensed influencers accuse

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>financial advisor Victoria Divine of a lack of disclosure that

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>She's on the Money. Founder was criticized on Instagram and

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>then in The Australian Financial Review for a partnership with

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>investing app six Park despite not breaking any rules Sophie.

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 1>For those who don't know who is Victoria Divine well,

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.919
<v Speaker 1>Victoria is a licensed financial advisor and also director of

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Melbourne finance firm Zella.

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 2>She is also the.

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Very popular host of Australia's number one money podcast, She's

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>on the Money. So the podcast is really aimed at

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>helping millennial women find financial freedom and she is very

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>passionate about helping women take control of their own finances

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and makes smart money.

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Decisions for the future.

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>She's on the Money has hit one point one million

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>monthly life listeners and she has a large Facebook community

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of over one hundred and seventy thousand members. Victoria was

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>also named in Forbes thirty Under thirty list of young entrepreneurs,

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>so her career has absolutely taken off. She is an

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>incredibly hard worker and someone I have to say that

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I do really admire in the industry. Yeah, and just

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to be transparent, we do know Victoria. We've never actually

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>had the pleasure of meeting her in person, but just

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>being in the podcast space, we have come across each

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>other online and she has been on our podcast before,

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 1>so we just wanted to disclose we do know her. Yeah,

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. So I suppose this sparked a little bit

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 1>of interest when Victoria's name came up, because I was

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>really excited when I saw on the twenty fourth of

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>May that she had announced she was partnering with six

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Parts to launch as she's on the Money investing platform.

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So this has been in the works for quite some time.

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>So the collaboration is aimed at providing an affordable solution

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>for people looking to invest beyond a microinvesting platform. So

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 1>from the get go, Victoria has been very transparent to

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>say that she's on the money Investing platform is a

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>white label version of six Parks app, So for those

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:08.919
<v Speaker 1>who don't know what the term white labeling is it

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>is essentially when a company rebrands another product or service

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>produced by one company to make it appear as if

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>they have made it. So, Victoria actually released a podcast

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>explaining all the ins and outs of this app. It

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>was explained on her Instagram post that this is how

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the app was working and she was collaborating with six Park,

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think what is very clear about the app

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is although it is a white label platform, she has

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>clearly made the platform her own. So basically, this app

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>has been created to ensure that women are still empowered

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to make financial decisions. So the language is very similar

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to the language used in the She's on the Money community.

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>The branding is also directed at women and targeted at women.

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>And also Victoria is part of the process, so she

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>is actually very hands on with the people who sign

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>up to this platform. Yeah, and I think that's what's

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>so appealing about this app to the She's on the

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Money community is the fact that Victoria is overseeing her

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>client's portfolio.

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.239
<v Speaker 2>So that really is the difference.

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>So if you do go through six Park, you have

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>their team overseeing the portfolio. However, if you go on

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>She's on the Money, she is the one looking.

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Over the portfolio.

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>So it is a way of getting access to Victoria

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Divine without actually having to become her client and pay

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>her this exorbitant amount for that have her financial.

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Advice exactly right.

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>And I suppose the way that she manages to do

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>this is that that six Park is actually an investment

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>platform referred to as a robo advisor. So basically what

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>this means is it's a type of financial advisor that

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>provides financial advice or investment management online with moderate to

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>minimal human intervention. So basically, they provide digital financial advice

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>based on mathematical rules or algorithms.

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 2>So how Victoria.

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Explained it on her podcast was that you put in

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>some information about your financial situation and they sort of

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>come up with a risk portfolio for you based on

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of algorithms.

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 2>However, once it's.

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>All set up in the system, the financial advisors like

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Victoria do look over the portfolio to make sure it's

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>running properly.

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people have actually been comparing Victoria's app

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 1>to Raise, and it is a completely different type of app.

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>So Raise is a micro investing app, and this app

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that Victoria has created with six Park is the next

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>step up. So and that's what a lot of people

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>don't seem to understand, because you actually have to have

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>five thousand dollars you want to invest, so it's not

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>like with rays where you just chuck a couple of

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars from your purchase, Like this is the next step up.

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 2>So on the day.

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Victoria launched She's on the Money app and her collaboration

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>with six Park, the Australian Financial Review actually did a

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>really great article on it.

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Now this has.

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Spurred on micro influencer Maddie Walton to post on Instagram

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a review into Australian investing platforms. Well,

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Maddi goes by the Instagram handle Money with Maddie and

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>she is a twenty three year old retail worker from

0:09:55.960 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the Gold Coast. Now she has no qualifications in in finance,

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>she is not licensed at all, but she gives her

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>advice on this platform. So Maddie shared a carousel of

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>infographics where she outlined the features of the main Australian

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>investment platforms and of course she reviewed that she is

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Money new six part investment platform. So on

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the graphic Maddie made several claims which Victoria has refuted.

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.439
<v Speaker 1>So Maddi claimed that the app is not Chess sponsored,

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>meaning that the ASX can't keep a list of who

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>owns what shares. She also falsely accused Victoria of receiving

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>referrals from people who.

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Sign up to the app.

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>The post further claim that uses are locked into further

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 1>advice and become a pain client of Victoria's financial advisory Zella.

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Maddie also made a further claim that six part don't

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.839
<v Speaker 1>have a competitive rate for the robot advice space. Now

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Victoria has responded to Mattie's post. She wrote, I do

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>not get referrals from anyone that signs up. That is

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>factually incorrect. The fee is the same if you go

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>through She's on the Money directly or with six Park.

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Further to this, I have.

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Never and will never accept referral payments for any of

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>our podcast sponsors or show partners. We strictly only charge

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>an advertising fee, so we are never seen to be

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 1>financially motivated to get people to sign up with particular platforms.

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>We have refused many referral opportunities as they are not

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in line with the best interests of our community. Victoria

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>also further hit back at Maddie's claim saying her financial

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>advisory business seller is not involved in six Park. Victoria

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 1>also went on to say that the platform is in

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 1>fact Chess sponsored, so it is clear to me that

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these claims made by Maddie are very unsubstantiated. Well,

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and also if Mattie's claims come off the back of

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Victoria's Australian Financial Review article, so the Australian Financial Review

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>accidentally printed that Victoria was receiving a referral fee, which

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>they have now gone and corrected that she is not

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>receiving one.

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 2>And what's really interesting is it is actually not.

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Illegal for financial advisors at the moment to receive a

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>referral fee. However, it's one of those things that's frowned upon.

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a bit of a gray area. But Victoria has

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 1>said time and time again that she doesn't believe in

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>accepting referral fees at all. I suppose the confusion is

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>around the fact that referral payments are expected to be

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a band form of renumeration for licensed financial advisors under

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the government's contentious.

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Code of Ethics.

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>However, this still has not been passed, so even if

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Victoria was taking referral payments, it's actually not illegal.

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, the thing that.

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I find really interesting is a lot of these influencers

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>who have been having a go at Victoria and her

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>app actually accept referral fees. So one of those is

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Tash Invests, and she's been very vocal on her Instagram

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and also her TikTok about Victoria and the six Park app.

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And she has actually one finfluencer that is quite open

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that she does receive referral fees. So

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>if you look on her link tree, there are at

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>least four companies that she has referral fees for. What's

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting is Tash Invests hit out Victoria and said that

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>she's on the money also has referral fees, and this

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>is actually true, but the difference is that when she's

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>on the money has a referral fee. For example, for Upbank,

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>they actually give their listeners ten dollars, whereas Tash Invests

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>gives them five dollars. So I suppose what they do

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:20.959
<v Speaker 1>is that she's on the money, they could be getting

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that five dollars. However, they give it back to their

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>listener because they don't ethically believe in taking.

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 2>That refera exactly right now.

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>What is crazy that this shit storm has happened on

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>social media and gone back and forth and the Australian

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Financial Review has decided to jump in and create an

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>article pitching these influences against each other and slamming Victoria.

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>It's particularly interesting that the Australian Financial Review took this

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>approach because the whole argument was based on misinformation that

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:53.719
<v Speaker 1>they printed, which Victoria asked them to correct. Yeah. Well,

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>from a journalistic perspective, it is a really odd move

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>from the Australian Financial Review because the Australian Financial Review,

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.959
<v Speaker 1>if you compare them to other publications like, for example,

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the Daily Mail. We know the Daily Mail will run

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 1>with influencer gossip, but the Australian Financial Review is held

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>very highly between finance experts and also in the journalism world,

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and it seems really odd that they have written an

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>article based off almost idle gossip from some finance influences.

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>And if you read the article, it's very quote heavy

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>at the start and it puts across the influencer's view

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and then down the bottom it's where Victoria actually responds

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and everybody knows most people don't get to the end

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of an article, so it would be framed very much

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>on the side of these influencers. I found it also

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>really odd the fact that they Australian Financial Review wrote

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>this glowing article about how great this, how great Victoria's

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>partnership was with six part because if they're meant to

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>be so educated in the financial world, and that if

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>there was a problem with Victoria backing this app then

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>why did they do the review? So it doesn't make

0:14:57.680 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>any sense at all. If anything, it makes them look bad.

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>The thing that I just can't wrap my head around

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that there is such a better story here.

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Instead of going after someone who hasn't even done anything wrong,

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>why don't they.

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Go after the fact.

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>That there are unlicensed and unqualified people providing financial advice

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to people that has the ability to cripple them financially. Well.

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Earlier today, we spoke with Glenn James from my Millennial

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Money because we really wanted to pick the brains of

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>an expert and someone who is in that social media space,

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and we put a number of questions to him about

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>financial advisors and the laws surrounding what they can actually

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about and also this incident at hand. Let's go

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to our interview with Glenn. Firstly, Glenn, what is considered

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>financial advice?

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm glad you asked, because I think it's important

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 3>to just understand the framework of what financial advice is

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 3>and what it isn't. And I'm actually reading the Corporation's Act,

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 3>section seven sixty six B, and it says financial product

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 3>advice means a recommendation or a statement of opinion or

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 3>a report of either of those things. That and this

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 3>is the absolute kicker, is intended to influence a person

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 3>or persons in making a decision in relation to a

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 3>particular financial product or class, or financial products, or an

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 3>interest in a particular financial product or class. Then it

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 3>says point B it could reasonably be regarded as intended

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 3>to have such an influence. So if we back it up,

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 3>if I if I open an Instagram account today and

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 3>it says Glenn will get invested with Glenn, because I

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 3>just started a TikTok account for fun, and it's called

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 3>get get invested with Glenn. The minute I say, hey, guys,

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 3>if you want to set up a banking structure, should

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 3>use four bank accounts and if you want to find

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 3>a super fund, you should look at these three fees.

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 3>I've walked over the line of a class because I've

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 3>talked about superannuation of a class and I've also talked

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 3>about banking. So it's a very very easy line to cross.

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 3>And then the question is I've crossed the line. So

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm automatically in advice territory because I've mentioned the class

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 3>of product. The question is do I need to be

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 3>licensed for that advice? So the Corporations Act is not

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 3>digging around excuse my French or whatever when they're talking

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 3>about financial advice and financial product advice.

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>So does that make it really hard in this world

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we live in where we've got a lot of financial podcasts,

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 1>we've got influencers who are spooking financial advice. Is it

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>really hard when we get into the category of sponsorship,

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>because obviously you deal with that a lot. Is it

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:02.239
<v Speaker 1>hard to know what you're allowed to promote and what

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't promote and what you can't say.

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I think it is hard if you are

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 3>a licensed financial advisor, and we can get to that,

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 3>But just back to this whole You know, I'm a dude,

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 3>I work I make coffee during the day and I've

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 3>got a TikTok or an Instagram account in the night,

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 3>and I talk about money and it's you know, get

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 3>invested with Glenn and all that stuff. The question isn't

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 3>did Glenn give advice? That's not the question because all

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.439
<v Speaker 3>day long, I've opened my trap and I've said super,

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:39.640
<v Speaker 3>I've opened my trap and said bank accounts. I've opened

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:42.959
<v Speaker 3>my trap and said investing in shares. So I'm in

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 3>the territory of that financial product advice. The question now becomes, well,

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 3>do I need to be licensed? Because there's no different

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 3>than you know, we might go and get coffee tomorrow

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 3>and I say, oh, Sophie, name me, so go and

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 3>set up a spaceship or raise account. It'll be good.

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 3>Like that's financial advice all day long, by the definition

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 3>of the Corpse Act. And I don't want to try

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 3>and confuse things here, but the question is do you

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 3>need to be licensed? Now, both of you when you

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 3>just give financial advice like that, you don't need to

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 3>have a general advice license because the corpse that goes

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 3>on to say that because your main business isn't basically

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 3>financial advice and dealing with financial products and all that stuff.

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 3>So all day long at a barbecue, you can give

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 3>financial advice because it's not your thing and it's just

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 3>your opinion, you don't need to be licensed. And if

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 3>someone goes and buys a block of gold or a

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 3>snuggie or something off TV because you said so and

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.880
<v Speaker 3>it sucks, well, that's just on them. It goes back

0:19:56.920 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 3>to what's the core reason. Now, if I had a

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 3>get invested with Glenn TikTok, which I do, and I

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 3>make money from that, and I'm over the line of

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 3>talking about financial products and a class of products and

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 3>whatnot all day long, I think it's clear that in

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 3>that instance of being that financial influence or of influencer

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 3>all day long, I think it's pretty clear that you

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 3>might need to be licensed. Now, full disclosure, my Millennial Money,

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:35.679
<v Speaker 3>my podcast and all the stuff we do online, all

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 3>my blogs, I actually pay for a general advice license.

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>So, Glenn, because you are a retired financial advisor, can

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you talk us through what guidelines you have to adbide

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>by when you're giving financial advice and also when you

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>take sponsors on board for your podcast.

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So when I started my podcast, I was actually

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:59.479
<v Speaker 3>a financial advisor. I had my bricks and mortar financial

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 3>planning business, and you know, ordinarily, if I'm just doing

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 3>my thing, and you know, I'm a financial advisor and

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 3>someone comes into my office and they want financial advice, well,

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 3>we sit down and I get their goals, I get

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 3>their needs. I really understand their personal circumstances. Then I

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 3>put together a recommendation which is in the form of

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 3>a statement of advice, which is formal financial advice, and

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 3>that actually says, high, clients, you've told me you wanted

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 3>these goals met, Well, I believe these products will help

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 3>you achieve those goals, whether it's cash flow and banking structures,

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 3>whether it's getting out of debt, whether it's superannuation or insurance,

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 3>and I give them formal financial advice. It's a document.

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 3>It's pretty big document because you know, I have to

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 3>hang my hat on that advice, and it's compliant the law.

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 3>So it's really good because the clients have paid to

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 3>get advice based on their own personal situation. Now there

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 3>are strict rules involved if you are a licensed financial advisor.

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 3>So for example, in the eighties and nineties, if you're

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 3>a financial advisor, you could you might you know, put

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 3>a whole he bit of investments over in that company

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 3>over there, and they would say, oh, Glenn, you've done

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 3>really well. Let's take you over to Hawaii on a

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 3>junket and we'll pay for it all. So there would

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 3>be more incentive for the advisor to maybe use that

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 3>product because they're getting the trip to Hawaii. So fast forward.

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Now all that's been cleaned up out of the industry,

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 3>like you actually can't do it, and I'd just like

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 3>to have a jab there that I know. There are

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 3>still people in the medical profession who get flown around

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 3>the world on jackets from drug companies, but we won't

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 3>go there right now. So it has cleaned up a lot,

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 3>and there is now a code of ethics that advisor

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:11.719
<v Speaker 3>has to go by. So, for example, if you are

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 3>a licensed financial advisor and you had a podcast, well

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 3>you really couldn't take money to sign people up to

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 3>an investment because it's just against the law.

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 2>So how does that do for them?

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Because we're seeing so many finance influencers dubbed fin influencers,

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>how are the rules different for them?

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, they're not licensed, so it's the wild West. And

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 3>particularly with the podcasting and Instagram world. So for example,

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 3>on our podcast, I could pretty much say, hey everyone,

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 3>it's Glennye, welcome to my millennial money. I want everyone

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 3>to go and buy you this over here. Even if

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:03.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, everyone go buy Nike shoes. It's all good.

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.359
<v Speaker 3>Just they're the best shoes ever. I could be getting

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 3>a million dollars out the back door from Nike, and

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 3>it's legal because it's the wild West where it's different

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 3>than radio. You can't do that on radio. So I

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 3>think what we're finding is that, you know, twenty first

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 3>century tech and online stuff, you know, the old laws

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 3>haven't caught up with it yet. And I'm really predicting

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 3>that in the future there will be laws in place

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 3>for podcasters, there will be laws in place for influencers,

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 3>because it is actually the wild West. And I'm very

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 3>sure when I do a podcast, if there is a

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 3>paid thing, we will disclose it in the show notes

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 3>and it will be apparent that isn't it isn't ad

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 3>like I'm still going to slip in oh and I

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 3>wear night shoes like. So, I think there has to

0:24:56.000 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 3>be a level of integrity for the individual influencer when

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 3>they are dealing with this stuff because it is the

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.360
<v Speaker 3>wild West and there's actually no rules.

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 1>So does that mean say I started another podcast and

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I started talking about investments and crypto with all types

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of topics related to finance, Does that mean I could

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:18.719
<v Speaker 1>just go on and spook super annuation companies and anything.

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Because I absolutely, yeah.

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 3>Totally, you can do that tomorrow. You're a qualified for influencer.

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 3>And to me, it goes back to the wording in

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 3>the Corporations Act that says that it's a statement of

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 3>opinion that could influence someone. So by definition, if you

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 3>went out and created that podcast and you were like,

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 3>all right, everyone use this super company over here, or

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:51.959
<v Speaker 3>if you created an Instagram account and say I use

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 3>this super account because it's the cheapest, you're giving an

0:25:56.240 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 3>opinion about a financial product the corporation and Zach says

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 3>that that's financial product advice. So I think it's a

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 3>very gray area. And that's why for me personally, I

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.640
<v Speaker 3>pay close to forty thousand dollars a year to have

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 3>a license, a general advice license. Are we giving general

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 3>advice all day long? The Corpse Act says we're giving advice.

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 3>The question is do you need to be licensed? It's gray?

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 3>It hasn't been tested in court, and I believe I

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 3>would rather not work in the gray and just be

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 3>above reproach in that area.

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's so confusing though, for the listener

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>or consumer of this information, because it just seems so

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 1>odd to me that someone who has qualifications in finance

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>they are bound by all of these rules that they

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 1>have to abide by. Yet someone who then calls themselves

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a finfluencer and has no qualifications, no background experience in it,

0:26:57.560 --> 0:26:59.479
<v Speaker 1>they can just do whatever they like. I think that

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>their needs to be some sort of boundaries in place

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>for them as well. Do you think it is a

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit unfair that they are able to play by

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>their own rules.

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and I would actually, I guess for the benefit

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 3>of the consumer I think, and the regulator. You know,

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 3>if you have any influencer listeners or whatever that listen

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 3>to your podcast, I would actually be very very cautious

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 3>because ask have said they're like looking into this unlicensed

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 3>financial advice stuff. And by definition, if you're calling yourself

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 3>a finfluencer, you are influencing people about money and finance

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 3>and that often includes products. And I honestly think my

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, and I've thought about this for a whole

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 3>ten minutes, but I'm kind of thinking maybe there should

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 3>be some type of regulation that if you've got influence

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:01.199
<v Speaker 3>over say five thousand people or ten whatever the threshold is,

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 3>or you generate an income of over this amount and

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 3>you are talking about money, you need to be licensed.

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>What is so crazy is that finance brands and banks

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>they're going to opt to go with someone who doesn't

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>who isn't restricted by guidelines. So this is just pumping

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 1>up these unqualified influencers more, filling their pockets with more money.

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 1>And that it's even more harmful because it's really confusing

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>for consumers to know who is qualified and who isn't

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>qualified and who they should be taking advice for.

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Do you think it is quite.

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Concerning that these consumers are unknowingly receiving unlicensed information?

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Absolutely? And I mean I follow a few influencers

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 3>on Instagram because you know, I'm out there, I've got

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 3>a money podcast. I want to keep my finger on

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 3>the pulse what all the cool people are doing and

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 3>all that stuff. And I say that jokingly because I'm old, right,

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm not twenty three with a banging Instagram account or

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 3>TikTok follows or anything like that. But I think it's

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 3>I like to keep my finger the poles. I don't

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 3>know where I was going with this, but I think

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 3>it's actually the same as like if we forget the

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 3>word of influencers and we actually go and talk about

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 3>health and wellness and what about ice. You know, Glenn

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 3>James starts an investment, Sorry, Glenn James starts an instagram

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 3>like health with Glenn, you know, follow me for all

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 3>your health tips, And I could get really big and

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 3>I could be actually saying the biggest load of crap

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 3>and people are actually taking i don't know, lemon scented

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 3>water drinks or something weird to cure cancer. Because I said,

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 3>it works like it's actually no different to the health

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 3>stuff and it's equally concerning the health side of it.

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, that's such a good point because I

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>feel like people are sort of waking up to those

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>health and wellness influences and a lot of people are

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>now calling out their practices. But I think that a

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of consumers we just don't know. We don't know

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the rules regarding influencers. So it's really great to actually

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>have you on clearing up a lot of this because

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like a lot of our listeners will actually

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>take something away from this. But it's also confusing because

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>recently the government has come out and said that taking

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>advice from an unqualified financial influencer is like getting advice

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 1>from your mate down at the pub. I just think

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of confusing because I thought they'd be wanting

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to set strict guidelines in place. What do you make

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of the government's recent comments about it?

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I think, like anything, Jane Hume, who is

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 3>the senator who looks after all the financial services stuff,

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 3>I honestly think maybe she just got caught up in

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 3>a throwaway line. You know. I just don't know, And

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 3>all I know is one she's been on my podcast before.

0:30:57.040 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to get her to try and come back

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 3>on my podcast and talk about this. I have feeling

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 3>sull decline, but I'm still going to ask. But I

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 3>just just got to look at the regulator, and we

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 3>know that ACIK are looking at this stuff, and I

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 3>for one am not dicking around with ACIK like as

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 3>simple as that, because this stuff hasn't been tested in

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 3>court and I don't want to be the first one

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 3>that gets wheeled into court because a lot of the

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 3>times the regulator if it's gray, right, There's been cases

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 3>like in the late nineties, I forget the case off

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 3>the top of my head, but there was a case

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 3>that ACIK wanted to try. They didn't know the outcome

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 3>of and they paid the person they were suing legal fees.

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 3>So it was pretty much like, all right, here's a

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 3>couple of million dollars, go get the best legal device

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 3>you can get. We're going to sue you to see

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 3>if this stands up in court. And because all this

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 3>stuff's gray, I don't want to be the first one

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 3>that's you know, heading into the court to be tested.

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Because if you're found guilty of being out there providing

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 3>unlicensed financial advice, there can be prison time and over

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 3>one hundred thousand dollars worth of fines. And this is

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 3>why we just can't mess around with this stuff. And

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:22.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm not against people making a living online totally. I

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 3>want everyone to have a banging Instagram, but I just

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 3>am worried that it's just the wild West out there.

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it is going to take one influencer to kind

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of be made an example of.

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 2>I think in this situation.

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>And what I find really interesting is I wonder if

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the brand, the finance brand that they're promoting will also

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>be held.

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Won't be a great response, It.

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Won't be great pr for anybody involved.

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 3>No, And this is why, you know, you just have

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 3>to be aware of the playing field. And I just

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 3>caution everybody. You go back to that young lady who

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 3>was doing the health stuff, I think it was Bell

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 3>or something and she was then yeah, like, it's actually

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 3>no different than that, and it can be life or

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 3>death consequences in terms of financial death. And sure, given

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 3>a lot of these people you're influencing, like they're not

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 3>high income earners, Like if you had five hundred thousand

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.959
<v Speaker 3>dollars to invest, I'm pretty much confident I'm not going

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 3>to do what someone says on Instagram. But you just

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 3>don't know because these people do have influence. And yeah,

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 3>I just can't operate in that area. And that's why

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 3>I've got a license for general advice. You guys like

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 3>talk about a lot of like gossipy stuff. Are we

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 3>going to get to the gossip soon? Yeah?

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Like Glen wants Glen wants the tea he wants, Yeah,

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that's right.

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I listened to your vodcast on Guys.

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 3>I wait here for.

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Right, it is my next question.

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Actually, oh so let's just kind of step back a

0:33:55.040 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 3>bit just to really give another practical example. That Day

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:04.479
<v Speaker 3>show Sunrise. You know they've got a money segment. You know,

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 3>I was on Today Extra the other day, first time

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 3>on Today Extra. So that Today Show might have a

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 3>money segment, and they might talk about super So we

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 3>know that they've talked about a class of products. So

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 3>they're already in that financial product advice territory because they've

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 3>talked about the class of product. Now the reason they

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 3>don't need a general advice license is because money isn't

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 3>their core business. Their core businesses or Today's show, we've

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 3>got Karl here, you know, talking with people getting fired

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 3>and then getting rehired because it actually makes us money. Like, oh,

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 3>I also held a logo the other day. I've picked

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 3>it up in the studio. It was heavy anyway, you.

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Just pretended for a moment that that was yours exactly.

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's so it's just clear to know

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 3>because the Today Show and Sunrise don't have a business

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 3>in the background influencing people as they call business with

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 3>money and making recommendations. That's why they don't need the

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 3>general advice license.

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:08.439
<v Speaker 2>So that makes where we go back.

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:13.280
<v Speaker 3>We go back to get invested with Glenn's TikTok. Well,

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 3>my whole thing for my account is money. Yeah, people

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 3>send me DM saying what should I invest in? And

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if it's going to cut it by saying, hey,

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm not an advisor, get your own advice, but have

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 3>a look at this investment here.

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Hmm.

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 2>That's such a good point.

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 3>But also I'm not a lawyer. This stuff hasn't been

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 3>tested in court, and it's still the wild West. We

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 3>all know with new stuff, the law catches up, society

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 3>catches up.

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Now, Glenn, you touched on a bit of controversy before,

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 1>so we're going to get into it. So last week,

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>micro influencer Maddie Waltons, who works in retail but runs

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:01.720
<v Speaker 1>her account money with Maddie Now, she called financial advisor

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Victoria Divine out for her collaboration with six Park, saying

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that Victoria didn't completely disclose her financial benefits. Now, it

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>appears the Financial Review incorrectly referred to the partnership as

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a form of referral, which has subsequently been clarified as

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a revenue share agreement. Firstly, I'd love to know what

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>your reaction is to the story, and also maybe can

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you go into the rules around referrals.

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, my reaction was like, everyone, Oh, grab some popcorn,

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 3>let's have a read here. But no, firstly, I want

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 3>to say, full disclosure, I'm friends with Victoria. Full disclosure.

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 3>I've met Maddie. I think Tash was involved with that.

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 3>I've met all of them. I don't have a dog

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 3>in this fight, but I will say a couple of things.

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Sure Victoria, I think, and she since clarified. I think

0:36:57.239 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 3>she did a podcast and clarified it. I think she

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:04.839
<v Speaker 3>did another one or amended that clarification. And sure, she

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 3>obviously wasn't taking a referral fee. So if she was

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:12.880
<v Speaker 3>taking a referral fee, there would be more incentive for

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 3>her to sign up as many individual people as possible.

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 3>But we know that, you know, I make money, you

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:22.799
<v Speaker 3>make money. Everyone makes money. We get that she may

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:26.480
<v Speaker 3>have got lost in the semantics of the words, but

0:37:26.520 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 3>that's all being clarified and put to bed. So I

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 3>think one other confusing thing that was out there that

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 3>I saw that I'm not against six Park. I'm not

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 3>against Victoria, I'm not against anyone. Actually don't actually wish

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 3>ill upon anyone. But there was misunderstanding about what six

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Park was and the benefits because it's actually formal advice.

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 3>You get that statement of advice. And I don't want

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 3>to bore everyone to tears, but if you want to

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 3>actually understand a bit under the hood in a technical

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 3>way about six Park and how all that works with

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 3>robo advice, there's an episode over on My Millennial Money

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 3>and we go deep on the technicality side of that.

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 3>So all to say that the clab with six Park

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 3>that was legit. Six parks legit. I know six Park

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 3>when they reached out, I think someone asked, six Park

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 3>do you have advisors working there? And I think their

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 3>chatbot or email things said no, we do not have

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 3>advisors here. Where it's like, well, no, your computer produces

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 3>formal financial advice. So there was actually a few things

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:41.879
<v Speaker 3>that was in this teacup swirling around. There was some

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 3>semantics with wording. There was not understanding that six Park

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 3>actually provided formal financial advice. And the whole thing is like,

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 3>and this is the struggle we all have as podcasters right.

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 3>We have listeners from the whole spectrum, right, and we

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 3>have to do this show and try and please everyone.

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 3>And someone could say, well, why are you doing six Park?

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 3>You need at least five thousand dollars before you get invested. Well,

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:16.919
<v Speaker 3>believe it or not. If you don't have five thousand dollars,

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 3>that's okay, it's not for you. There can be other

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:22.959
<v Speaker 3>people that have thirty or forty thousand dollars laying around

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 3>they don't know what to do with it. So I've

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 3>had to like really try and understand myself. If I

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:32.359
<v Speaker 3>see stuff online and I get outraged, like how can

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 3>they do that? Well, okay, well it's obviously not for me,

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 3>and that's okay. So I think there's just it was

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 3>a big teacup with a lot of things moving. And

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 3>good on the girls for, you know, asking for some clarity.

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:50.799
<v Speaker 3>Totally get that, And good on Victoria for also being

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:53.840
<v Speaker 3>open with a bloody AFR. Because if there's someone I

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 3>don't want to dick with, it's the ASSIC and the AFR.

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 3>They're the two acronyms, whereas like and they're probably the

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 3>ato in there. There's three acronyms that I don't want

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 3>to mess around with.

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Right, it seems like there is this sort of war

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 1>against financial advisors and the finfluencers. Do you think there

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>is some kind of motivation for some finance influencers to

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 1>try and push these type of stories to tear the

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 1>financial advisors down, because obviously they're all competing for the

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 1>same sponsorship revenue. What do you think some of the

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 1>motivation for these type of stories are.

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 3>I think there's the biggest fight out there online is

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:37.919
<v Speaker 3>for attention, and if you can make some noise right

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 3>or wrong, you'll get attention. So yeah, I just think

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 3>it's it's wild and yeah, it's good times. But I

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 3>honestly think there will be change coming from the regulators.

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I was going to ask you that, Glenn, what do

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you think needs to change about the rules?

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think, going back to what I said before,

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:04.800
<v Speaker 3>like if I'm running my millennial money and I'm generating

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 3>an income and I've got over X amount of followers

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:12.240
<v Speaker 3>or over X amount of income, I think you should

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:14.719
<v Speaker 3>just have to have a general advice license, as simple

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:18.799
<v Speaker 3>as that. So I honestly think in terms of the

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 3>money scene, the regulators probably need to step out and say, yeah,

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 3>if you influence over X amount of people, or you

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:33.280
<v Speaker 3>generate over X amount per year on that money account.

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 3>That is a core business. You are influencing people about

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:40.760
<v Speaker 3>money and all that stuff, because I've watched influences online

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 3>say stuff about money and it's been categorically incorrect.

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely, Well, thank you so much, Glinton. Yea, that

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 2>was great, Thank you.

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it is going to be so interesting to

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:56.319
<v Speaker 1>see this time next year what new guidelines are in place,

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 1>because I do think major changes need to be made.

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 1>The fact that these unqualified finance influencers aren't bound by

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the same guidelines as financial advisors is just so wrong

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to me, because they can push the boundaries when promoting

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:15.840
<v Speaker 1>financial products. I think it's also quite disturbing because because

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 1>they aren't bound by these guidelines, they are more appealing

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to big brands who want to use more persuasive language

0:42:21.800 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and have calls to action during these adverts. The financial

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 1>advisors legally and ethically don't give well. Just on the

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:33.240
<v Speaker 1>issue of brands, I do wonder if some big brands

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:35.920
<v Speaker 1>are going to reassess whether they do want to use

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:40.280
<v Speaker 1>unlicensed influencers in the future to promote their products, because

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 1>they do lack a lot of credibility, and we are

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 1>going to see in the future. I believe some influencers

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 1>who are unlicensed held to account. And if you're a

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:51.879
<v Speaker 1>big brand, you might be saying far our. I don't

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 1>know if I want to be made an example and

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 1>attached to those kinds of people. Yeah, and also it

0:42:56.719 --> 0:42:59.799
<v Speaker 1>does make me really think about the influencers involved in

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:04.240
<v Speaker 1>this Victoria Divine story. So for me learning the fact

0:43:04.320 --> 0:43:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that these unlicensed influencers can actually gain this referral money

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 1>and also you know, do whatever they want basically with sponsors,

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it does make me think, well, is there a reason

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 1>why these two women have decided to drag Victoria down?

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Because I do think that. I mean, they're working with

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:25.400
<v Speaker 1>sponsors that she also works with. So if they are

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 1>pointing out that this is ethically and also claiming that

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it is legally not right, and then getting this information

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Australian Financial Review, for people and brands that

0:43:35.719 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 1>don't actually understand that, hey, Victoria actually didn't do anything

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:43.000
<v Speaker 1>wrong here, they might not want to actually sponsor her. Well, yeah,

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>they've got a lot to gain, don't they by dragging

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:49.239
<v Speaker 1>someone like Victoria Divine down because she is arguably the

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 1>biggest finance influencer in the country, and if she's not

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:55.720
<v Speaker 1>in the picture anymore, that's going to give other people

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity. I don't know whether that is their motivation,

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 1>it might not be at all, but it does seem

0:44:00.600 --> 0:44:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit iffy that this sort of stuff is going on. Well,

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:05.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm really worried that there is a vendetta going on

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:07.279
<v Speaker 1>because as someone who is part of the She's on

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the Money community, these two girls were actually removed a

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago for distributing factually incorrect information and also

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:19.759
<v Speaker 1>breaching community standards of self promotion. So these two girls

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 1>were actually trying to promote their own pages in the group,

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and clearly for Victoria, who is a financial advisor, she

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:30.279
<v Speaker 1>would be very against unqualified people putting out that sort

0:44:30.280 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of information.

0:44:31.360 --> 0:44:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you know what's crazy?

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Because you think about in twenty twenty one, we all

0:44:35.080 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 1>seem to be so savvy about wellness influencers and everybody

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:41.720
<v Speaker 1>seems to be calling out health and fitness and wellness

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:45.880
<v Speaker 1>influencers for spreading misinformation. But it seems like we're only

0:44:46.080 --> 0:44:48.359
<v Speaker 1>now becoming clued on to the fact that a lot

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of these finance influencers have no credibility, they have no qualifications.

0:44:54.239 --> 0:44:56.320
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't seem like we're that concerned by me. It

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:59.320
<v Speaker 1>seems like we will still consume the government aren't concerned

0:44:59.360 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 1>about it. I think people are unaware because I did

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 1>come across tash invest page before and I wasn't aware

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that she was a disability worker. I just assumed she

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:12.560
<v Speaker 1>was a financial advisor because I didn't really look much

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:15.160
<v Speaker 1>into it. And that's the thing, though, there's nothing wrong

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:20.440
<v Speaker 1>with someone taking interest in being financially literate, but it

0:45:20.520 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 1>does get into a gray area when you are telling

0:45:23.200 --> 0:45:25.600
<v Speaker 1>other people what to do with their finances. And as

0:45:25.640 --> 0:45:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Glenn said, this gray area because if they are giving

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 1>financial advice, they should be under the same laws that

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a qualified financial advisor is under, because it's, as Glenn said,

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 1>it's the wild West.

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Otherwise, you did.

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Touch on this before, aiming I think there is a

0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:44.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of tall poppy syndrome going around at the moment,

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:47.479
<v Speaker 1>particularly with Victoria divine and sadly, I think the fact

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that she is a young, successful woman has a lot

0:45:51.160 --> 0:45:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to do with it.

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:54.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you look at Glenn.

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Who is also a very successful host of a money podcast,

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:02.319
<v Speaker 1>he does not receive the scrutiny that Victoria receipts. You

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:04.680
<v Speaker 1>just have to look at Victoria's reviews to see that

0:46:04.760 --> 0:46:08.080
<v Speaker 1>she is being unfairly targeted for some reason, and it

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is very clear that I don't know, for some reason,

0:46:10.960 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't like to see a woman doing really well.

0:46:13.080 --> 0:46:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is.

0:46:13.760 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 1>It is so true because I think a lot of

0:46:15.680 --> 0:46:18.399
<v Speaker 1>the same audience that would listen to Glenn also listen

0:46:18.480 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to Victoria. And as as you said, the reviews are

0:46:20.920 --> 0:46:23.240
<v Speaker 1>really different. I mean, there's one thing if you're reviewing

0:46:23.239 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 1>someone and you're actually legitimately giving them something to work on.

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's the structure of their podcast.

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:30.520
<v Speaker 1>But there are a lot of reviews which do tear

0:46:30.600 --> 0:46:33.840
<v Speaker 1>her down her personality. Yeah, I do find it interesting

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's two young women that are trying to sort

0:46:37.120 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of drag her down. Yeah, it is really awkward because

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:41.680
<v Speaker 1>when I was researching this topic, I did have a

0:46:41.719 --> 0:46:44.640
<v Speaker 1>look at tash invest TikTok page and one of her

0:46:44.640 --> 0:46:47.960
<v Speaker 1>popular videos was her actually talking about how she received

0:46:47.960 --> 0:46:50.879
<v Speaker 1>a comment from Victoria define and how she was fanned.

0:46:50.560 --> 0:46:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Going over it. So it is crazy.

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:54.760
<v Speaker 1>In just a few months it has blown up into

0:46:54.840 --> 0:46:57.399
<v Speaker 1>this kind of feud between the pair. I am really

0:46:57.400 --> 0:46:59.640
<v Speaker 1>interested to see what does happen in the future because

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:02.440
<v Speaker 1>they have I've been calls by senior finance lecturers at

0:47:02.560 --> 0:47:06.319
<v Speaker 1>r MIT for social media to introduce wealth warnings on

0:47:06.400 --> 0:47:08.880
<v Speaker 1>social media content, and I think this is a great

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:12.520
<v Speaker 1>idea because at the moment there are unlicensed influencers who

0:47:12.600 --> 0:47:15.840
<v Speaker 1>are able to say anything they want without any repercussions.

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Well that's all we've got time for today. Thank you

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 1>so much for listening to another episode about Spoken. If

0:47:21.120 --> 0:47:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you did like the episode, we would love if you

0:47:22.880 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 1>could leave us a review as it really helps us out.

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:28.799
<v Speaker 1>And don't forget to subscribe on Spotify and also on

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts and also on Spotify. If you can leave

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 1>us a love heart, it really does help out the show.

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Who I like the idea of

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:37.879
<v Speaker 1>The love heart And just a reminder if you are

0:47:38.000 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 1>interested in discussing the topics we've spoken about on the podcast,

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:43.880
<v Speaker 1>go and join our Facebook community which has outspoken the

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:44.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast community.