WEBVTT - Steph Claire Smith's Wedding Extravaganza And The Truth About Juddchella

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Hi, and welcome to Outspoken. Coming up on the episode

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the aptastic wedding dress that has spark debate, the most

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:12.639
<v Speaker 1>extra housewarming party to grace Instagram, and one school sexist

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>move that's causing outrage. But first, how was your week?

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Amy? My week was pretty good. Thanks.

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>We had so many meetings again, but one meeting just

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>stood out in particular. Sophie and I got taken to

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the most fancy restaurant by one of our potential new clients,

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and it was so fancy we didn't even know how

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to open the door. Its lid open for us. I'd

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>actually call it posti.

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 2>It was posti. It was very posti.

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Now, for those who don't know what posti is, this

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is a word our uncles and mum created back in

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the day, and basically it means very snobby or rich

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>or ostentatious. Is that how you guys would describe I

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>would say it's that there can be a person that

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>is a post pack. So that is someone that is

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent pretentious. They might go to a private

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>school and their daddy might be a lawyer, and that

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. I think there were a lot of

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>people's daddies who were lawyers at this lunch on Friday.

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Oh definitely, it was the most I felt so uncomfortable.

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>It was so funny though, because they brought over the

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>first course and it was literally chips with fancy dip.

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I know, it was crazy. What about you, Kate, how's

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>your week been? Yeah, my week's been really good. I

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>did have a funny phone call from Sophie on Wednesday afternoon.

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 2>She was very excited.

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 1>We both have now purchased Kick merchandise official merchandise, which

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>is very exciting. Yeah. Well, we have been doing Kick

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>for over a year now, so I thought it was

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>quite fitting that we get some of the new merchandise.

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, you guys are so sad. Anyone who

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>has a product to spreak bloody spreak it to Kate

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and so if they believe everything. You guys were like

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the same when says he's day brought out her merchandise.

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I did get her new Blackout limited edition jumper, which

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm so excited for. Well, what I was excited was

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>about was when I looked at the Kick website, I

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>noticed that Laura had the gray jumper and Sta I've

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>had the black and you know your blonde Dame Brunette.

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>It worked out really well, piect, so we should probably

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>move on to our first topic. It's been described as

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Australia's answer to a royal wedding. This Saturday, millennial women

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>around the country were glued to their Instagram feeds, hoping

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to catch the first glimpse of models Steph Claire Smith

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>tie the knot to her childhood's sweetheart Josh Miller, Sophie

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and Kate, you were so excited about this wedding. What

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>is it do you think that captivated millennials around the country.

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>All I have to say, I don't think I've been

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>as excited for something like this. I feel like it's

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the female equivalent of the AFL Grand Final. Well, I

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>actually saw that someone tweeted that they tweeted happy Steph

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Claire Smith's wedding day. Well, even days before, I was

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>just so excited, Like on the Friday it felt like

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Christmas Eve. I just kept boring Brandon with all the details.

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>That's not sad Christmas Eve, but I was just so

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 1>excited to see the dress and I kept messaging Kate

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>really early that morning being like, have you seen.

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Anything that is the epitome of sad.

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a been of the text messages

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and I was equally excited. And I think the main

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>reason why this has captured so much attention is because

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it seems like it really is a true love story.

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Steph and Josh both met when they were twelve up

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.839
<v Speaker 1>at the river in their properties, and since then they

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>have had a fairytale romance and it's just really nice

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to see two people that seem to really genuinely care

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>about each other. I think it is very rare in

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the entertainment industry because most people seem to meet, you know,

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>other famous people. The fact that their childhood sweethearts, as

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you say, and first met when they were twelve, it's

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty special. So another big thing that people were really

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>interested about was obviously the dress. Steph's kept it pretty private,

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>but on Saturday we saw glimpses of it across Instagram. Well,

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>like many others, I was scaring Instagram all day just

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to try and get a little sneak peek, and the

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>first image I saw was a friend snapchat which showed

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>her hugging someone, and for the first time it was

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>revealed that she was wearing a two piece dress, and

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I had never seen a dress like this before. It's

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>from One Day Bridle and it was actually a crop top.

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>It was a very kind of fitness inspired look.

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 2>So it was a crop top.

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>With this full kind of skirt, full length skirt and

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a full length veil. And the thing that was most

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting was that she had her incredible abs on display.

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sorry, but why not if you're Steph Klesmith Amy,

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:19.679
<v Speaker 1>what's your opinion of the first dress?

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's not.

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Something i'd personally choose to wear, but as he said,

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you've got abs like that, I don't

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>blame her, but I don't know. I didn't love it.

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I actually thought it looked quite simple, and it seems

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of models or sort of celebrities, they

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 1>always look a bit plain at their weddings because you're

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>so used to them being done up. I feel like,

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>because she had quite a lot of skin on display,

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I liked the fact that she kept it a bit

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>more simple with natural makeup and a loose spun in

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 1>her hair, and then she had that kind of elegant veil,

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>So I felt like that was quite good, and I

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>like the fact that it did have that fitness vibe,

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>so I thought it did suit her style. We're also

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>going to remember she is the face of Bondi Sands

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 1>and her tan was absolutely popping in that dress. She

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>looked amazing. She definitely had her best assets on display.

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>But for me, I was sort of it was a

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit his. I always think her style is a

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 1>little bit hit and miss or. I was really interested

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to see what it looked like, and it wasn't what

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I was expecting at all. It kind of was what

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 1>I was expecting in a strange way, because as you say,

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't seem to have a defiant style, so the

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that it was kind of a bit out there,

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I felt like she wouldn't have something traditional. What were

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>their groomsmen wearing. I didn't even really notice they were

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>all in black. But I did love the bridesmaid dresses.

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>They were actually from showing a Joy and they were

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>this beautiful kind of blush colored pink. They did look

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>stunning all the bridesmaids, so she was clearly a nice bride,

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>no Bridezilla there dressing her bridesmaids terribly well. Laura Henshaw

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>has actually released a kick podcast about pre wedding and

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>According to Laura, her best friend and Kick founder, Steph

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>was not a bridezilla at all. In fact, it seemed

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>like she kind of had everything planned out perfectly and

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't really need any help. The only thing the bridesmaids

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>got to organize was the Las Vegas Hens party. Well,

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 1>moving onto the second dress, and this is what has

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>captivated a lot of people because it was very reminiscent

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>of Hailey Bieber's dress. Now, I don't know if you

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>guys remember this, but it was this kind of slinky

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.359
<v Speaker 1>slip dress, which is what Steph also had, and she

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>paired it with sneakers, which seems to be the biggest

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>bridal slash.

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Millennial trend at the moment.

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what. I don't blame her considering it

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>was the second dress. I actually saw the photos and

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>thought she'd worn the san Cho's to the ceremony, But

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that kind of makes sense to wear it

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to the reception if you're dancing. There's nothing worse than

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 1>having sore feet at a wedding.

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, it might seem.

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>Like she's actually late to the trend, because in twenty eighteen,

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Serena Williams actually wore Sancho's to her wedding she married, Yeah,

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>she mighty the snapchat.

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:43.799
<v Speaker 2>Oh I just thought they had a baby together.

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so she wore san Cho's and also back in

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen, The New York Times wrote an article about

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>how sneakers are the newest millennial wedding trend because women

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>are on their feet for twelve or fifteen hours out

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of their wedding day. So I feel like millennial women,

0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>it just like can't.

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Be stuffed with that. We've got to be comfortable and

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 2>actually enjoy the day. Were they a particular brand?

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I was just going to say, she is the new

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Editors ambassador as well, so that might have had something

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to do with it. Well, I didn't spy a brand

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>on there, but you know we might see I reckon.

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>They do look like added us. That's pretty cool kind

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of I don't know, isn't that something you think I'd do?

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>So wear sand choes at my own Probably?

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Probably.

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I just know Amy's going to rock up about four

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>hours late to her own wedding. I got to leave

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the groom waiting for a little bit. Well, as we

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>touched on, there was a very fitness kind of vibe

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to her wedding dresses and she has, and before her

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>wedding day, she did go into the fact that she

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't going to get caught up in this whole shred

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>for your wedding bullshit.

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 2>What did she say online?

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Kate? There was a rather interesting Instagram post. Yeah, so

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>her Instagram post said, let's talk web shred. So many

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of you have messaged me asking me what I'm doing

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in the lead up to the wedding, and my answer

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>is nothing outside of the usual. I love working out,

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I love eating well, but I also love pizza, cheese, wine,

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and chocolate. And I haven't deprived myself of any of

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>those things leading up into the wedding. Why because when

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm too strict on myself, I'm not happy, and I'd

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>rather be happy in the lead up to my wedding. Sure,

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to feel my best on my wedding day,

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>but my best isn't my skinniest. And who the heck

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>made up the idea we have to look our best

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>on our wedding date. Anyway, I cannot wait to walk

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>down the aisle towards the love of my life that

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>loves me for me, because whenever I'm around here, and

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:25.239
<v Speaker 1>I honestly feel my best anyway. I love that because

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>there are so many photos you see of brides looking

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:32.439
<v Speaker 1>positively skeleton like and they just I mean, it's quite

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>hard to live up to, isn't it. If you're a

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>skeleton in your photos and your kids see them and

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>then you just look sort of normal every day.

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, it's not realistic.

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>What I like is the fact that she didn't actually

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.199
<v Speaker 1>try and monetize shredding for the wedding. She could have

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>easily added a new fitness program on and made money

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>out of it, but she actually still sticks with her

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>message that kick pushes a really body positive message, and

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that was great. I think it was such

0:08:57.760 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful message that she put across. And it isn't

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>annoying that she has copped some criticism for her dress,

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>But that being said, they were quite polarizing outfits. Pedestrian

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>called her dress abtastic, which was quite nice. That was

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>good a good reaction. News dot Com said they were

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>unusual dresses, and Harper's Bizarre called them unconventional. We did

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>put up photos of the dresses on our Facebook page

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and it did receive a bit of a mixed reception.

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Some people absolutely loved the fact that she was wearing sandshoes,

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and so many women actually said that they'd already done

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that even twenty years ago for their wedding, but others

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>hated the second dress in particular. So these were a

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>few of the comments. One woman wrote, well, if you're

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>going to wear clothes that looked like someone just ripped

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>up a tablecloth from a fancy restaurant and wrapped it

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:47.199
<v Speaker 1>around you as best a blind person can, then having

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>comfortable shoes is a must. And someone else wrote, is

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that a wedding dress looks like she got it for

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty bucks on Asos clearance or something? I was gonna say.

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Because the dresses have sparked such controversy, do you think

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>they'll start popping up on websites that have made copies

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>because that always happens with the raw wedding. Well, it's

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>happened with the Kardashians too, to the point where they've

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>actually sued them. The interesting thing is the dress has

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>actually already popped up pre the wedding on the one

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Day Brider website. I think a lot of boyfriends will

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 1>be very happy this weekend is over because there were

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>many who copped an earbashitting my boyfriend being one of

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>those people. It got to a point where he just

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>glazed over and just stopped listening to what I was saying.

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about their beautiful love story. Oh do

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you like the crop top? Do you like the cutouts?

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I actually come of it because I couldn't give a

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>shit about their wedding. I mean, I sort of enjoyed

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>seeing some of the photos. It looked like a great day.

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know if anyone else out there doesn't

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>give a shit either. But you don't get it when

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you do the kick program, you feel like they're your friends.

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it was a friend's wedding, but you

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't even be that excited about a friend's wedding. You

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>guys have been absolutely gaga.

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 2>What is that?

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 1>That's some sort of psychological so Steph Claire Smith appeal.

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like, as Gefly says, I've got a crush on

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.079
<v Speaker 1>step Smith. I feel so sorry for your boyfriend's having

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to listen to this garbage. I want that I have

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a crush on Steph Smith. Steph Clere Smith t shirt. Well,

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>she has actually changed her name partly on Instagram, So

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>now her one point five million follows will see that

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.319
<v Speaker 1>her name is Steph Miller on there, but her handle

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.319
<v Speaker 1>still is Steph clair Smith obviously, so people can find her.

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I think she should still keep Steph clear Smith. It

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>just goes together. Football Royalty Beck and Chris Judd sent

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Instagram into meltdown on Saturday after sharing photos of their

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>extravagant Coachella themed housewarming party. The event, dubbed Judd Cheller,

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>was held to celebrate the family moving into their newly

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>renovated seven point three million dollar Melbourne mansion. No expense

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>was spared and the attention to detail was next level,

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 1>prompting the question, was the party for the guests all Instagram? Okay,

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>can you tell us about this party? Of course, Beck

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>was inspired by the real Coachella and she enforced at

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 1>TACKI Coachella dress code. So we saw lots of wags

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>there wearing ridiculous outfits, lots of glitter, lots of glam.

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty over the top look to be honest,

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I saw the photos on Instagram and they all looked

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 1>like a bunch of old try hard.

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 2>That's what came. I know they're not.

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Actually old come on now, now, now, I will not

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>have you bag out Beck jud or Nadia Bytel.

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Come on mate, they looked incredible.

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it's because you know, when you see

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>shots of Coach Tailor, it's always eighteen year olds that

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>are dressed up in all the glitter and cutoffs. I

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>just think they looked like a bunch of poses. I mean,

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's what they were going for. To be fair,

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the emphasis was on taki and it was a costume party. Well,

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Beck actually did have a glitter stand and the stick

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>on jewelry stands so people could come in their outfits

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and then add tackiness to it, which I.

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Thought was really cool.

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I find that funny though, because I was watching all

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of Nadia Bartel's Insta story amid my Steph Claire Smith

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>wedding span and She's Weekend for you it was it

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>was and she had a makeup artist do all of

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>her glitter and special makeup. So how much of that

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>glitter store was actually maybe it was for the peasants

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>who couldn't afford makeup arty. To be honest, if you're

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>going to that kind of party, you know those photos

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>are going to be put all over at the very

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>least the Daily Mail talking well, I did actually see

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>some peasants that were from Yummy Mummy at the party

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and they were wearing a lot of glitters. I think

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>they hit up. Well, so you said peasants, I'm think

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>all rich on. Oh no, know, actually they're not all

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>rich as the Adelaide mom. Well, I did read an

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting piece on Refinery twenty nine and it was talking

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>about how we are the first generation to deal with

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>this kind of unique situation where our parties exist in

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 1>two realms, so obviously in real life and then the

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>online world. So we're basically having to balance an event

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>where we think, okay, what is actually going to look

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>good in photos and what's going to be realistic in

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>real life. Well, I think Beck certainly was thinking like

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that because she had so many activations set up that

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>was so instagram worthy. As I said, she had the glitter,

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>she also had a margarita bar, she had music acts

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>on stage, she had a taro reader, she had a

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>TP balloons cakes. It was ridiculous, and there was even

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>straw like stirs in that you put in your cocktails

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that said Judge Chella on it. How instagram worthy is that? Well,

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, if your house is worth seven million,

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you can't just put like on a cheeseboard, can you?

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>But this has taken it to the next level.

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 2>May there were lots of cheeseboards.

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, you think if you'd spent seven point three million

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars a home, you might not have enough to scrape

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>together a huge event like that. But I mean we're

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>naive to think that they paid for that event. That

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>event would have been covered by all those sponsors. I

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>was going to say that, but where do you think

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>their wealth comes from? Do you think a lot of

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it has come from Chris Jad or is it the

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Jagged brand? I think that Beck would be making I

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>think that Beck would be bringing home a lot of

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the money. She's on radio, she has Jagged, she has

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>her presenting roles on Channel nine Postca owns Jugged Jacket.

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, she is a leading partner in Jagged as well.

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>We've got to remember Chris jud would have probably put

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of his money into property, so they probably,

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, spin one make more money on her. So

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>this is now the house they moved into is actually

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>there forever home. So I think they've been spinning a

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of properties in the I'd love.

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 2>A seven million dollar forever home. That'd be great.

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, back onto the brand endorsements. This party definitely

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>was paid for by brands. Actually put a post up,

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, saying how great the party was, and she

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>ended up tagging thirty one products and services in the post.

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>And it was ridiculous.

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 2>It was from popsicles to.

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Wine to balloon. It was just unbelievable how many companies

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>had been tagged. I kind of felt sorry for them

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>because they've seemed to be lost in the big massive

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>tags within the one post. It is an interesting pickle

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that you're in, though, because I feel like it's quite

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>rude at parties to constantly be on your phone. But

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>then again, in this situation, if you're invited to this

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>type of event, people want you on your phone gramming

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>about it. I can assure you every person would have

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>been on their phone. This would be a party that

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>nobody really talked about. You know, when you kind of

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>go to an event that's really cool, or you have

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>such a great time with friends and you don't instagram anything,

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like maybe it's reflective sometimes how many instagrams

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>they are about an event to what it's like, but

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>then again, the event did look fucking crazy.

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's hard because I feel like.

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>There's moments where you go to events like weddings or

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>those special moments where you should actually just be in the.

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Moment and enjoy it.

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Because most of the time when I've been to a

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>really great event, I haven't actually put anything up or

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>even thought to take a photo because I'm having so

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>much fun. It would have been the best people watching,

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel if you were someone at this event. The

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>outfits themselves were amazing. What did you guys think of

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>what Beg Judd was wearing? Just to remind you, she

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>had like pink kind of underpants on. It was very

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>victorious secret esque, and she had a stomach out as well,

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>which was very toned.

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 2>She looks like an anime character. I felt like she.

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Also had rainbow colors in her hair, lots of glitter.

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 2>She kind of like.

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>When I saw her, she sort of looked like Billy,

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>her daughter. I could see her in her face. I

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know why she seemed to be a childlike. I mean,

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's all a bit of fun. I think

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that Amy thought they looked like old fools, But you know, look,

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>don't get me wrong, they're only like thirty six. But

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it just seemed like there's a bit

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of desperation in some of the posing in those photos. Well,

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 1>I love Nadia by Tell and she definitely killed it.

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:13.479
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there was a lot aimed at Jimmy,

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>but she had a black bikini on with lots of sparkles.

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 2>She looked amazing. Beck and Nadia.

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I would like to know what they eat and who

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>trains them, because it's just ridiculous they look that good

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>after having all those kids. I me, we're talking about kids.

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Where the hell were all their kids? Where they like.

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Add another little smaller Coachella?

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Oh sorry toad Cella in the backyard, or there was

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>no kid in Si Yeah kid Cello, Well, our baby

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Cella were like at the babysitter. Our cousin actually went

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to Cochella, And from all accounts, that party was a

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>very glamorized version of what the event is actually like

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>when you're camping, when you're getting dust blown in your eyes,

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 1>when you're standing in line to.

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Have a shower or go to the toilet.

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you think the timing of the event had anything

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 1>to do with trying to take the show off Steph

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Claire Smith's wedding. Well, it's stranger. There were two big

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>events like that in Melbourne. I don't think it had

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with Steph Claire Smith's wedding. I think

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it probably just landed on the same day. It was

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>almost like the young influencers were all at Steph Cless

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Smith's wedding and then the yummy mummies were kind of

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>at bes.

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Which would have you rather been at?

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that's tough, I would say Steph Cleft Smith's wedding. Yeah,

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>i'd say step Sorry, that's funny. I'm sorry, but I

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>personally couldn't think of anything worse than being a judge teller.

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>It looked so uncomfortable wearing all those outfits. I mean,

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.679
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather be sort of like in the house with

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>one of those mirrors that you can see out and

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>they can't see in and just sitting in my track pants.

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:38.959
<v Speaker 2>Watching That's pretty much Instagram, isn't it.

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>That is well. I was looking up the hashtag earlier

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's funny because I had all the glamozon wags

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>They're looking amazing, and then they had some like normal

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 1>older people that just looked a bit tragic. Well, when

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I saw it online, I actually had no idea it

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>was for their house warming, and I was like, what

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 1>the fuck is this self indulgent party about.

0:18:58.400 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 2>I did wonder what it was.

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean if I are going to hold another

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>one though, like if they want to put an event

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>in the main, Kate and I would like to go,

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think amy. So they said, I'm keen

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>just to watch from a fire in my track. Fan.

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 1>It's given me some incredible ideas for our White party though,

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to make some incredible white party straws. Our

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>white party is our Christmas party, by the way, for

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>those who are not friends, that are an iconic small

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 1>gathering of certain people wearing white.

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 2>It's always a great time.

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Many a controversy has gone down at those parties, So

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>if you would like to hear about ours this year,

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll have to hold off for a special Christmas podcast.

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:36.479
<v Speaker 1>And I think we should probably move on to our

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 1>top headlines of the week. A Melbourne school reportedly bans

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>girls from wearing leggings because they're distracting, and that's from

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>seven News in Melbourne. So basically a senior teacher has

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>gone on to the school portal and told girls they're

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to wear leggings anymore to school because it

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>sexualizes them. And the comment was actually quite hilariously deleted

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>just two hours later, but apparently the band remains.

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 2>What do you make of it?

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Also, Well, the thing that's confused me the most about

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>this is do children actually wear legans to school? Well,

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming it's in for pe when you just put

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>on whatever.

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Kit you want. Well, I don't.

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I know at our high school we had to wear

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a particular uniform. But that aside, I do think it's

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 1>utterly ridiculous. What is going on in this world? I'm sorry,

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>but wouldn't a skimpy schoolgirl dress be somewhat more arousing

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>than a pair of black long legings. Well, I don't know.

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 1>I suppose leggings don't leave that much to the imagination.

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.479
<v Speaker 1>But it's kind of just a bit bizarre because we're

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>living in twenty nineteen. Why are we banning the girls

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>from wearing what they want to wear. Why aren't we

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>educating the boys, maybe, you know, not to sexualize the

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>girls who were just wearing their leggings to play sport.

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a bit ridiculous. What of it happens when they

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 1>go outside of school and they say women in legans?

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Are they just going to go off? It's just ridiculous

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.679
<v Speaker 1>because legans an active where are the most kind of

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>in fashion items of clothing. At the moment, I think

0:20:57.680 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>if I had a daughter, I'd much prefer her to

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 1>be wearing wearing legans and some skimpy outfit. I don't

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>really think there's much wrong with legans at all. Well,

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>our next headline reads married at first Sits newcast is revealed.

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Two female bodybuilders, YouTube stars and a surprise lesbian couple

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>feature in the most outrageous lineup ever, and that one

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>was from the Daily Mail. Now what interests me in

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>this was the fact that Elizabeth, who was in last

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>year series, has been named as the intruder. That's interesting

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:28.239
<v Speaker 1>because Martha said she was pretty sure she wasn't going

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to be on there. Well, I was pretty convinced after

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>hearing the little gossip here and there. But it's quite

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>hilarious because she's been paired with a former s ANFL

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>footballer from Adelaide's sib Seb Guilhouse and I think everyone

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>around Adelaide basically knows him. What a proud local moment

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 1>for a good Adelaide boy out there, well, those who

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>aren't from Adelaide. He actually is sort of. He's known

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>as a topless waiter and an s ANFL footballer and hilariously,

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>when I was working at Today tonight, he was part

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 1>of a story where he was filmed getting fake tans

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of thing. So I'm not sure if

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be the perfect match for Elizabeth, but

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens. So the next headline reads, Kim

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Kardashian and Sharon Stress like you star in Uber eats

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>commercial Sophy. What did you make of it? Because I

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>personally loved it.

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:16.239
<v Speaker 2>I didn't like it.

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>It made me feel uncomfortable. I watched it last night

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and I was kind of my jaw hit the ground.

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I was like, how the hell has Kim Kardashian put

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>her name to this. I do think it's cool that

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>she's part of Kathin Kim's such an iconic Australian show.

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 2>All I could think.

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>About was the bags and bags and bags of money

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>she must be receiving for putting on that Sharon Stress

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>like he Weigan outfit. Well, I feel like it was

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 1>probably worth it for Uber Eats branding because they were

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>on the front of many newspapers. I saw them on

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>the front of The Herald's son great publicity. What I

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>loved most was there was an extended interview and Kim

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>revealed that she just loves Tim TAM's and she said

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 1>she was going to have a Tim Tam Slam. So

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:55.479
<v Speaker 1>there's another product benefiting from the Kim Kardashian factor. I

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>just want to know when it was filmed, like, did

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Sharon go over there?

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Sharon looked very old, didn't she She did.

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>She really did, though, and I didn't find her funny

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>at all. It was like, oh the footy frames, I

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 1>was just old.

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 2>It was a bit old. I would have liked to

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 2>see missus d with her.

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why she didn't dress up as Kim.

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Her name's Kim. It would have been hilarious.

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>And her being rude to Sharon, Yeah, maybe she wasn't

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>into it. And the last headline is from The Guardian.

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>It reads American Music Awards twenty nineteen, Taylor Swift takes

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Artist of the Decade in record breaking hall and this

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>is an incredible story. Taylor Swift gave the most powerful

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>performance at the American Music Awards, where she was honored

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>with Artists of the Decade. And there is a huge

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>backstory to this well. She announced on Tumblr last week

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that she was planning or performing a medley of her hits.

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Throughout the decades.

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>At the show, however, Scooter Braun said she's not allowed

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to perform her songs on TV because he claims that

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 1>she would be re recording her music before she's allowed

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to next year. What a dickhead. Rather long story to it,

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>but what I love was Taylor Swift came out on

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>stage and saying the Man, which, as you know if

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you've been listening to our podcast for a while, is

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>our favorite song. It talks about her frustrations with a

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:15.400
<v Speaker 1>sexist double with sexist double standards, and it was.

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Like she was singing it to Scooter Braun.

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 1>But what was probably the most newsworthy part of that

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>story was the fact she came out with a white

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>top that had all the names of the albums that

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>she wasn't allowed to sing and then she ripped it

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>off to reveal I think a sparkly dress. So it

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>was a big fuck you basically also well, she also

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 1>had her album names engraved into the piano she played

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the performance as well.

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 2>So good.

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think that's all we've got time for today.

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us.

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Just a fun fat fuel.

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 1>This is actually the second time we've recorded this podcast.

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately it deleted itself, so apologies if this one we

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 1>think the other one might have been better, but you know,

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll never know, will we. We spoke about Steph Claar

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Smith a lot more so if anyone wants any more

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 1>conversation around it, just let sof and I know we'll

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>film a potty nugget of that. I think we've heard

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 1>enough about Steph Kasmith if you would like to join

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in the conversation though, you can follow us on Instagram

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>at Outspoken Underscore the Underscore Podcast. We're also on Facebook

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 1>by the same name, and if you could it would

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 1>we'd love it so much if you could leave us

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a five star rating on iTunes because it really does

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>help us out.