1 00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:03,239 Speaker 1: Look, we know this situation and this Shar's scandal continues 2 00:00:03,279 --> 00:00:06,640 Speaker 1: to dominate headlines and parliament. It was once again the 3 00:00:06,680 --> 00:00:10,760 Speaker 1: focus in Parliament yesterday from the opposition. They were during 4 00:00:10,840 --> 00:00:14,280 Speaker 1: question time really calling for the government to release cabinet 5 00:00:14,280 --> 00:00:17,919 Speaker 1: minutes to prove that mister Pike raised the conflict with 6 00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:21,840 Speaker 1: his colleagues when alcohol policy was discussed. Now joining me 7 00:00:21,880 --> 00:00:23,880 Speaker 1: on the line to talk about this, but to talk 8 00:00:23,960 --> 00:00:24,959 Speaker 1: about a lot. 9 00:00:24,760 --> 00:00:25,880 Speaker 2: Of other things as well. 10 00:00:26,079 --> 00:00:29,280 Speaker 1: It is the now independent Member for Blaine, Mark Turner. 11 00:00:29,320 --> 00:00:33,120 Speaker 1: Good morning to you, Mark, Good morning Katie, Thanks so 12 00:00:33,200 --> 00:00:36,200 Speaker 1: much for your time this morning. Mark. Do you think 13 00:00:36,200 --> 00:00:39,760 Speaker 1: that these announcements need well, these minutes, I should say, 14 00:00:39,760 --> 00:00:41,320 Speaker 1: do you think they need to be released? 15 00:00:43,040 --> 00:00:44,839 Speaker 3: They don't need to be under the rule book, But 16 00:00:45,040 --> 00:00:49,800 Speaker 3: if you care about public perception and transparency then it's 17 00:00:49,800 --> 00:00:53,560 Speaker 3: a no brainer. But for your listeners, most people will 18 00:00:53,560 --> 00:00:58,800 Speaker 3: remember the turf club shenanigans and they refuse to release 19 00:00:58,840 --> 00:01:03,560 Speaker 3: cabinet documents to the Icon Commissioner then, so it's it's 20 00:01:03,600 --> 00:01:07,200 Speaker 3: frustrating because it's when when it suits them, the rule 21 00:01:07,200 --> 00:01:09,800 Speaker 3: book comes out. You know, I kept on hearing them 22 00:01:09,800 --> 00:01:15,880 Speaker 3: shouting about Westminster democracy across the chamber, but when it 23 00:01:15,920 --> 00:01:16,959 Speaker 3: suits us. 24 00:01:18,959 --> 00:01:20,840 Speaker 2: So, I mean, what needs to happen here? 25 00:01:20,920 --> 00:01:24,520 Speaker 1: Mark, because this you know, the opposition and some of 26 00:01:24,520 --> 00:01:28,399 Speaker 1: the independents calling for Chancey Pake to stand down. Chancey Pake, 27 00:01:28,480 --> 00:01:30,679 Speaker 1: you know you probably heard that interview I did with 28 00:01:30,760 --> 00:01:33,280 Speaker 1: him yesterday. He is digging his heels in and he's 29 00:01:33,280 --> 00:01:34,640 Speaker 1: saying he's done nothing wrong. 30 00:01:35,880 --> 00:01:39,280 Speaker 3: Of course he is. He's a career politician. I've learned 31 00:01:39,319 --> 00:01:44,640 Speaker 3: how this game works now. The if he if he resigns, 32 00:01:46,120 --> 00:01:49,480 Speaker 3: then he's going to be toaxed. So and it's what 33 00:01:49,520 --> 00:01:53,320 Speaker 3: do you do next? The other issue you've got to 34 00:01:53,320 --> 00:01:56,640 Speaker 3: player is the internal machinations of the Labor Party that 35 00:01:58,640 --> 00:02:02,040 Speaker 3: you saw the COLP throwing of them yesterday about three 36 00:02:02,120 --> 00:02:05,880 Speaker 3: chief ministers and three speakers exactly the stuff the Labor 37 00:02:05,880 --> 00:02:09,240 Speaker 3: Party threw at the COLP with the amount of cabinet 38 00:02:09,240 --> 00:02:12,520 Speaker 3: reshuffles that they had, so they know the lines that 39 00:02:12,560 --> 00:02:14,560 Speaker 3: are going to get used against them in election time. 40 00:02:14,960 --> 00:02:17,400 Speaker 3: And I'd imagine either is just doing a cost benefit 41 00:02:17,880 --> 00:02:21,160 Speaker 3: analysis on do we get rid of him this close 42 00:02:21,200 --> 00:02:24,639 Speaker 3: to an election or do we just try and weather 43 00:02:24,680 --> 00:02:25,000 Speaker 3: it out? 44 00:02:25,160 --> 00:02:26,960 Speaker 2: So do you reckon that's what's going on here? 45 00:02:27,000 --> 00:02:29,600 Speaker 1: Do you think realistically the Labor Party is going this 46 00:02:29,760 --> 00:02:34,239 Speaker 1: could be too damaging to get rid of another senior leader. 47 00:02:34,360 --> 00:02:38,240 Speaker 1: Realistically within the Labor Party, we're just going to need 48 00:02:38,240 --> 00:02:39,680 Speaker 1: to weather this until the election. 49 00:02:41,080 --> 00:02:45,880 Speaker 3: Yep. Well, look to give Natasha credit, she fell on 50 00:02:45,919 --> 00:02:49,840 Speaker 3: her sword. It took a while, but she read the 51 00:02:49,919 --> 00:02:54,600 Speaker 3: rule book and did the right thing. I don't think 52 00:02:54,680 --> 00:02:58,680 Speaker 3: chance he will and he'll be sitting there going well, 53 00:02:59,000 --> 00:03:01,680 Speaker 3: I have a large male in my electorate, a quada. 54 00:03:02,200 --> 00:03:06,680 Speaker 3: I'll just ride this out and free surface at some point. 55 00:03:07,639 --> 00:03:10,160 Speaker 1: Mark. Look, there's lots of questions being made or being 56 00:03:10,160 --> 00:03:13,440 Speaker 1: asked now, I guess as well, with different parliamentarians need 57 00:03:13,520 --> 00:03:15,760 Speaker 1: to divest their shares. We are going to catch up 58 00:03:15,760 --> 00:03:18,280 Speaker 1: with Keesiopuric after eleven o'clock and talk a little bit 59 00:03:18,320 --> 00:03:21,200 Speaker 1: more about shares. You know, I know it's an area 60 00:03:21,280 --> 00:03:24,480 Speaker 1: that she feels pretty passionate about. I mean, what do 61 00:03:24,520 --> 00:03:27,200 Speaker 1: you make of that? Should the COLP like, should they 62 00:03:27,240 --> 00:03:30,400 Speaker 1: be treating this as seriously as well in divesting these shares. 63 00:03:30,440 --> 00:03:33,519 Speaker 1: I heard both yesterday and the day before in parliament 64 00:03:34,080 --> 00:03:36,640 Speaker 1: evil all are sort of yelling out the different shares 65 00:03:36,680 --> 00:03:38,640 Speaker 1: that some different members currently hold. 66 00:03:40,160 --> 00:03:42,520 Speaker 3: It's a difficult one. Isn't it. Because you want competent 67 00:03:42,600 --> 00:03:47,520 Speaker 3: parliamentarians and it's difficult enough to attract people into a 68 00:03:47,600 --> 00:03:51,640 Speaker 3: job with the public profile and the risk attached to 69 00:03:51,680 --> 00:03:56,000 Speaker 3: that when you would earn more as a mid level 70 00:03:56,040 --> 00:04:00,280 Speaker 3: manager in the public service, So you don't want to 71 00:04:00,440 --> 00:04:03,800 Speaker 3: further dilute the people that you've got available to you. 72 00:04:04,840 --> 00:04:07,320 Speaker 3: The Center for Public Integrity came out with a reasonably 73 00:04:07,360 --> 00:04:10,320 Speaker 3: good suggestion that while you're in office, you put your 74 00:04:10,360 --> 00:04:14,200 Speaker 3: shares in an index tracker that can follow, for example, 75 00:04:14,240 --> 00:04:18,120 Speaker 3: the AX and then if the Australian economy is doing well, 76 00:04:18,120 --> 00:04:21,559 Speaker 3: which you're supposed to be trying to do, your shares 77 00:04:21,640 --> 00:04:24,680 Speaker 3: go up. But because it's just tracking the top two 78 00:04:24,800 --> 00:04:30,000 Speaker 3: hundred companies or whatever, you're not you can't be accused 79 00:04:30,080 --> 00:04:35,720 Speaker 3: of impropriety because you bought shares in a staff Troup 80 00:04:35,800 --> 00:04:38,120 Speaker 3: farm or mango farm in your electorate. 81 00:04:39,000 --> 00:04:40,440 Speaker 2: Well, because this is the thing, isn't it. 82 00:04:40,480 --> 00:04:42,599 Speaker 1: You know, like there are some people sort of going 83 00:04:42,720 --> 00:04:44,839 Speaker 1: it was four hundred bucks worth of sheesh, you know, 84 00:04:45,000 --> 00:04:47,359 Speaker 1: like is it really going to change the way that 85 00:04:47,400 --> 00:04:50,640 Speaker 1: you're making a decision at the cabinet table? But you know, 86 00:04:50,680 --> 00:04:54,279 Speaker 1: the question here is whether it does cloud your judgment 87 00:04:54,520 --> 00:04:58,840 Speaker 1: in any way, and I guess that's where we're currently sitting. 88 00:04:59,560 --> 00:05:02,040 Speaker 1: You know, why would you even invest in shares then, 89 00:05:02,080 --> 00:05:08,640 Speaker 1: you know, are supplying goods two communities, presumably in your electros. 90 00:05:09,320 --> 00:05:13,360 Speaker 3: Yep, that will be the analysis that most people will 91 00:05:13,360 --> 00:05:15,560 Speaker 3: make it the only shares I've got through my police 92 00:05:15,600 --> 00:05:18,599 Speaker 3: super But I think the other angle to this is 93 00:05:18,640 --> 00:05:23,359 Speaker 3: that it's the perception, yet again that it's one or 94 00:05:23,360 --> 00:05:25,440 Speaker 3: all for them, one for all for us. If you 95 00:05:25,440 --> 00:05:27,960 Speaker 3: look when they kicked me out over voting for the 96 00:05:28,000 --> 00:05:30,880 Speaker 3: select Committee into Police mental Health. I've got a very 97 00:05:30,880 --> 00:05:33,440 Speaker 3: stern letter about how important it is to follow the rules. 98 00:05:34,920 --> 00:05:38,920 Speaker 3: But when Chancey, you or Natasha have got shares, then 99 00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:41,520 Speaker 3: oh it's the rules. Is it really such a big thing? 100 00:05:43,640 --> 00:05:48,400 Speaker 3: So that's the problem. It's the born to rule arrogance 101 00:05:49,880 --> 00:05:52,520 Speaker 3: of people in certain high level positions that when it 102 00:05:52,560 --> 00:05:55,119 Speaker 3: suits them, we'll do it. When it doesn't, we won't. 103 00:05:55,200 --> 00:05:58,120 Speaker 3: And territory ands don't like that. Nobody likes it. That's 104 00:05:58,160 --> 00:06:00,000 Speaker 3: why people are so annoyed with politicians. 105 00:06:01,000 --> 00:06:03,039 Speaker 1: Mark. I do want to move along because there is 106 00:06:03,120 --> 00:06:05,360 Speaker 1: quite a bit to talk about this morning, and there 107 00:06:05,400 --> 00:06:08,839 Speaker 1: was legislation introduced in Parliament yesterday making changes to the 108 00:06:08,839 --> 00:06:12,279 Speaker 1: recruitment of the Children's Commissioner. Now we know that we 109 00:06:12,400 --> 00:06:15,080 Speaker 1: have obviously got a new Children's Commissioner in place, but 110 00:06:15,240 --> 00:06:18,280 Speaker 1: as I understand, this comes to the recruitment process if 111 00:06:18,320 --> 00:06:22,520 Speaker 1: that job becomes vacant again. Essentially, the legislation being introduced 112 00:06:22,560 --> 00:06:26,560 Speaker 1: recommends that the commissioner be an Indigenous person. As I understand, 113 00:06:26,640 --> 00:06:29,800 Speaker 1: this was a recommendation of the Royal Commission, and there 114 00:06:29,920 --> 00:06:33,279 Speaker 1: is a safeguard should there not be an Indigenous person 115 00:06:33,320 --> 00:06:38,440 Speaker 1: who's adequately qualified available. Is that your understanding of this legislation. 116 00:06:40,720 --> 00:06:45,240 Speaker 3: Yeah, so the administrator canna point, but it has to 117 00:06:45,240 --> 00:06:48,880 Speaker 3: be on the minister's recommendation, and the Minister's only allowed 118 00:06:48,880 --> 00:06:53,880 Speaker 3: to recommend a non Indigenous person if they can't find 119 00:06:53,880 --> 00:06:58,080 Speaker 3: a superly qualified one. To my point, I put it 120 00:06:58,080 --> 00:07:02,400 Speaker 3: out on my social media and our community groups as 121 00:07:02,400 --> 00:07:04,359 Speaker 3: soon as it came out yesterday because I looked at 122 00:07:04,400 --> 00:07:07,240 Speaker 3: it and went, wow, where do you pull the line 123 00:07:07,279 --> 00:07:09,640 Speaker 3: with this? Are we going to do it with the 124 00:07:09,640 --> 00:07:15,280 Speaker 3: Ikak Commissioner, the Police commissioner, the Health Complaints Commissioner. It 125 00:07:15,440 --> 00:07:17,400 Speaker 3: just doesn't seem to be good governance. 126 00:07:19,000 --> 00:07:21,920 Speaker 1: Well, presumably they've done it because it is or because 127 00:07:21,920 --> 00:07:24,760 Speaker 1: it was a recommendation of the Royal Commission. From what 128 00:07:24,880 --> 00:07:27,360 Speaker 1: I can gather, there has been discussion about the fact that, 129 00:07:27,400 --> 00:07:30,280 Speaker 1: you know, the reason they've done it is because a 130 00:07:30,360 --> 00:07:34,840 Speaker 1: large majority of children that are in care or in 131 00:07:34,920 --> 00:07:38,400 Speaker 1: custody are Indigenous. But you think, do you think it 132 00:07:38,440 --> 00:07:39,800 Speaker 1: goes a step too far here? 133 00:07:41,040 --> 00:07:43,400 Speaker 3: I don't. Yes, yes, I think it's a massive step 134 00:07:43,440 --> 00:07:48,000 Speaker 3: too far. I don't think we should legislate based on 135 00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:52,760 Speaker 3: division by the amount of melanin in our skin or 136 00:07:52,800 --> 00:07:55,680 Speaker 3: where we're born my things. An absolutely terrible idea. 137 00:07:55,840 --> 00:07:57,440 Speaker 2: So what do you reckon needs to happen here? 138 00:07:57,760 --> 00:07:59,240 Speaker 1: What do you think needs to happen Because we're just 139 00:07:59,440 --> 00:08:02,280 Speaker 1: that sort of introduction of the legislation stage, aren't we. 140 00:08:03,440 --> 00:08:05,200 Speaker 3: Labor are going to push it through on their numbers. 141 00:08:06,640 --> 00:08:09,240 Speaker 3: And this is I suppose why we had a difference 142 00:08:09,240 --> 00:08:14,400 Speaker 3: of opinion, because there's no ability to talk about things. 143 00:08:14,480 --> 00:08:16,560 Speaker 3: If that's the decision, and that's the decision he's made, 144 00:08:16,600 --> 00:08:21,080 Speaker 3: then that's what's going to happen. But I don't think 145 00:08:21,120 --> 00:08:24,840 Speaker 3: it's a good idea the and I just don't think 146 00:08:24,840 --> 00:08:27,880 Speaker 3: there's any need for it. You know, we've got a 147 00:08:28,000 --> 00:08:32,720 Speaker 3: lady who appears on everything either it to be eminently 148 00:08:32,800 --> 00:08:36,280 Speaker 3: qualified for the role and got the role without the 149 00:08:36,320 --> 00:08:41,240 Speaker 3: need for legislation. The segregates please a bad taste in 150 00:08:41,280 --> 00:08:46,800 Speaker 3: my mouth. You know, I cannot see why we would 151 00:08:46,840 --> 00:08:52,400 Speaker 3: do it. And as for Royal Commission recommendations, governments again 152 00:08:52,520 --> 00:08:55,800 Speaker 3: take them and leave them. We had the Royal Commission 153 00:08:55,880 --> 00:08:59,520 Speaker 3: recommendations about opening up the FOI laws and neither side 154 00:08:59,559 --> 00:09:01,080 Speaker 3: of politics wanted to talk about that. 155 00:09:01,520 --> 00:09:03,640 Speaker 1: So I reckon they pick and choose what to use 156 00:09:03,679 --> 00:09:06,480 Speaker 1: when it comes to, you know, to Royal Commission recommendations 157 00:09:06,600 --> 00:09:08,720 Speaker 1: or to recommendations made from any report. 158 00:09:09,760 --> 00:09:13,520 Speaker 3: Yeah, well, look at the You got a big Royal 159 00:09:13,520 --> 00:09:19,920 Speaker 3: Commission into domestic violence about co locating services and ensuring 160 00:09:19,960 --> 00:09:22,720 Speaker 3: that people weren't overloaded with work, and none of that's 161 00:09:22,760 --> 00:09:27,040 Speaker 3: come to fruition. You know, We've had so many inquiries 162 00:09:27,080 --> 00:09:32,400 Speaker 3: into police resourcing that always show the same thing. There 163 00:09:32,480 --> 00:09:36,040 Speaker 3: was a big Senate report on first respondmental health and 164 00:09:36,080 --> 00:09:38,280 Speaker 3: I think that was in twenty nineteen. Again, none of 165 00:09:38,320 --> 00:09:39,199 Speaker 3: that's been actioned. 166 00:09:39,880 --> 00:09:43,200 Speaker 1: So before I let you go, mate, because we are 167 00:09:43,200 --> 00:09:45,120 Speaker 1: going to have to get ready to wrap up. Yesterday 168 00:09:45,200 --> 00:09:48,720 Speaker 1: in question time in Parliament, you raised an issue, or 169 00:09:48,760 --> 00:09:52,680 Speaker 1: you asked a question about victims of crime, what was 170 00:09:52,720 --> 00:09:54,360 Speaker 1: the concern that you were raising? 171 00:09:56,200 --> 00:10:01,600 Speaker 3: So we've got them. Samara is very gracefully give me 172 00:10:01,640 --> 00:10:05,080 Speaker 3: permission to use her example. She's finding out what's happening 173 00:10:05,080 --> 00:10:08,920 Speaker 3: with her core case from the media. You guys are 174 00:10:09,040 --> 00:10:11,360 Speaker 3: putting it out there, and she's going, oh, I didn't 175 00:10:11,360 --> 00:10:13,040 Speaker 3: know that, and then trying to chase it up to 176 00:10:13,040 --> 00:10:19,360 Speaker 3: find out why, and her concern and mine are because 177 00:10:19,400 --> 00:10:22,880 Speaker 3: it'sn't media worthy. She's finding that out, but what is 178 00:10:22,920 --> 00:10:25,600 Speaker 3: happening to the people who don't find it meat you're worthy. 179 00:10:26,760 --> 00:10:29,319 Speaker 3: You've got I think maybe three members of staff in 180 00:10:29,360 --> 00:10:33,280 Speaker 3: the Witness Assistance Service who are carrying hundreds of case loads, 181 00:10:34,880 --> 00:10:39,120 Speaker 3: and they range from what you'd consider volume property crime 182 00:10:39,160 --> 00:10:45,559 Speaker 3: to murders and rapes. It's just completely inadequately resourced. When 183 00:10:45,600 --> 00:10:47,400 Speaker 3: I was a policeman, they didn't even have a car, 184 00:10:47,840 --> 00:10:50,199 Speaker 3: so we'd have to try and between our jobs pick 185 00:10:50,280 --> 00:10:51,840 Speaker 3: up witnesses and drop them off at DVP. 186 00:10:52,160 --> 00:10:52,360 Speaker 1: Yeah. 187 00:10:52,440 --> 00:11:00,720 Speaker 3: Right, No other jurisdiction underinvests in what's such an important role, 188 00:11:00,760 --> 00:11:06,520 Speaker 3: And it goes back to putting victims first. We've got 189 00:11:06,600 --> 00:11:10,120 Speaker 3: our criminal justice system completely back to front. 190 00:11:10,040 --> 00:11:13,960 Speaker 1: So an increase in resources or what needs to happen here? 191 00:11:15,080 --> 00:11:20,760 Speaker 3: Yep, massive increase in resources. We either have well, we 192 00:11:20,800 --> 00:11:26,160 Speaker 3: don't have enough working fit, healthy police to stay on 193 00:11:26,200 --> 00:11:29,200 Speaker 3: top of it all, which we used to do. So 194 00:11:29,320 --> 00:11:32,040 Speaker 3: you either fix the police force so that police can 195 00:11:32,920 --> 00:11:35,120 Speaker 3: stay in contact with their victims and witnesses and look 196 00:11:35,160 --> 00:11:39,720 Speaker 3: after them, or you're going to need to hire about 197 00:11:39,840 --> 00:11:43,679 Speaker 3: twenty more staff. You know, I've had a look at 198 00:11:43,880 --> 00:11:46,520 Speaker 3: what other places have got internationally and you've got case 199 00:11:46,559 --> 00:11:50,679 Speaker 3: workers with twenty or thirty max. Yet our people are 200 00:11:50,679 --> 00:11:51,960 Speaker 3: sitting with a couple of hundred. 201 00:11:53,240 --> 00:11:55,079 Speaker 1: Well, I tell you what, it does sound like there 202 00:11:55,120 --> 00:11:57,040 Speaker 1: needs to be some serious work here. And I think 203 00:11:57,080 --> 00:12:00,880 Speaker 1: that anybody that has been the victim of crime stands that, 204 00:12:00,920 --> 00:12:03,400 Speaker 1: you know, they understand that there isn't enough support there. 205 00:12:03,440 --> 00:12:06,800 Speaker 1: And the fact that Samara Lavity Declan's mummy's finding out 206 00:12:06,840 --> 00:12:10,719 Speaker 1: what's going on through the media is a real indication 207 00:12:10,840 --> 00:12:13,400 Speaker 1: of that. And it's not a criticism against those that 208 00:12:13,440 --> 00:12:15,680 Speaker 1: are working with those victims of crime, but like you've 209 00:12:15,679 --> 00:12:18,240 Speaker 1: touched on that, there's not enough and there's not enough 210 00:12:18,280 --> 00:12:20,679 Speaker 1: resources there. So I think it is a discussion that 211 00:12:20,800 --> 00:12:24,160 Speaker 1: does need to continue to be had, Mark Turner, we 212 00:12:24,200 --> 00:12:26,000 Speaker 1: are going to have to leave it there for this morning. 213 00:12:26,080 --> 00:12:29,760 Speaker 2: Really appreciate your time. Thanks so much for joining us, No. 214 00:12:29,800 --> 00:12:31,000 Speaker 3: Thanks having me on Katie. 215 00:12:31,120 --> 00:12:32,160 Speaker 2: Thank you, you two