WEBVTT - Ask Uncut - Not your Darl!

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Life on Cut acknowledges the traditional custodians of country whose

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>lands were never seated. We pay our respects to their

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>elders past and present.

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:11.399
<v Speaker 2>Always was, always will be Aboriginal Land. This episode was

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 2>recorded on Drug Wallamuta Land. Hi guys, and welcome back

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 2>to another episode of Life on Cut.

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm Laura, I'm Brittany. Do you just have a testy pop?

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I think you did? You like Laura? Well, that's

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 3>how I feel. Do you know I've been up since that.

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>You feel like a previous and voyage of testy pots.

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 3>We got to really dig deep into that one. I

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 3>feel like a fourteen year old male male man. Fuck, like,

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 3>shut up, it's gonna be a long while. But I

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 3>mean I was since five thirty this morning. Guess what

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 3>I was doing? Everyone? Did you worry out? Dancing? Dancing,

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 3>doing the drive? Who wants to dance at five thirty

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 3>in the morning.

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 2>No one, not even my dance teacher who didn't arrive

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 2>on time because he slept in. I got to the

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 2>studio and I was like, hey, don't know where you're

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 2>at And he was like, uh, asleep.

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 3>And then and I waited forty five minutes until he

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 3>got there.

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>So isn't that the worst thing? When I did it

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>not long ago? Actually, I did it to you. The

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>worst thing when you wake up to a message that's

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>like a where are you message and you're in bed

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, holy mold. I love that you say

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I did it to you recently, because there's not been

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a time recently where you replied with I'm still in bed.

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 3>So I'd love to know when you were just running

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:28.119
<v Speaker 3>late to.

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>No there was member was supposed to be on a

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>meeting and I was in bed and I woke up

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and the meeting was done, and I was like, so,

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like, so.

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Fam I missed the boat on that one.

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:38.199
<v Speaker 1>I slept through my alarm and you guys have finished

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the meeting and I am in bed. No.

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Do you know what my absolute pet hate is? Like

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 2>that I can handle because that's at least like a

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 2>reflection of a mistake. My pet hate is when someone says, oh,

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 2>the traffic was really bad, but they know and you

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 2>know that there was no bad traffic because you both

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:54.279
<v Speaker 2>drove the same route.

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Now, that is my The other day, flute fury.

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>The other day, I was like, they're not going to

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>believe this. I was like, guy, sorry, the traffic's really bad.

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>There was a hectic accident, and I was like, they're

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>not gonna believe it. A whole tree fell across A

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>whole tree fell across the road on to crush the car.

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not funny. You crush the car and you couldn't

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>get up the road. And I was like, I took

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a picture. I still I'm showing you. But I was like,

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I have to take a picture because they're not gonna

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>believe me when.

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 3>I say the traffic was bad.

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 4>When you text us that, I looked at Laura and

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 4>I was like, oh, she's doubling down.

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:25.519
<v Speaker 3>She's really She's like, oh, there's a tree on the road.

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 3>That's why I had to take the picture. You scooed

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 3>it over that.

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 1>How's the dancing, Ah, not good. I don't believe it's

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>going it's dancing. It's unmoving my body in the direction

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of a dance.

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 3>How many dances do you know? Three?

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:38.959
<v Speaker 4>Four?

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 3>That's pretty good.

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>I a four four and I'm in the midst of

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>learning my last one. Okay, yes, I know four, but

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>none of them very well. But we're getting there anyway.

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>When I can update you guys properly.

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 2>I absolutely will, and I'm sure you're all dying and

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 2>on the edge of your seats. But anyway, asking cart

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 2>this is where we answer you your dark and you're

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 2>burning questions. But before we do, we had a couple

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 2>of things we wanted to talk about first. Now, the

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 2>first thing I wanted to say is that there has

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 2>been the cutest thing going down in the Life Uncut

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 2>discussion group. We feel so grateful for the incredible little

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 2>community that we have and for how amazing as community

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 2>members you guys are to each other. And there was

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 2>just the sweetest thing that happened recently that I wanted

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 2>to kind of touch on.

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Melissa Swansbra she is one of our community members. She

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 2>posted in the group that her daughter, like her baby,

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 2>had lost her beloved NONI.

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 3>Now, I don't know if you're a mum, you might

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 3>get what this is.

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 2>But like most children get, like really attached to a

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 2>singular teddy becomes their comforter and it's the thing that

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>they'll you know, take with them to when they go

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 2>to bear, they take with them to daycare or whatever.

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 3>So a comfort blanket blank a lot of kids called

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 3>a blankie.

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 2>A blanky, a comforter, a teddy, whatever it is. So

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Melissa's little girl lost her comforter, which she calls her NONI.

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 2>There was photos she basically posted in the group and

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 2>she posted a photo of her little girl with her

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 2>blankie and was like, does anybody in the group have

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 2>one of these something similar? So that she doesn't have

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 2>to be without her very precious little items.

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>And to reiterate, she's put photos in of her daughter

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and since she's a newborn for three years, with pictures

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of her with this blanket, like it has been stuck

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to this little.

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:13.839
<v Speaker 3>Girl for three now.

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Deborah Carroll, who's another Life on Car community member, she

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 2>wrote back and wrote, oh my god, you wouldn't believe it,

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 2>but yes I do. I got three of them from

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 2>my baby shower a few years ago and I still

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 2>have two of them brand new.

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 2>The reason why this is so bloody cute is because

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Deborah went and she sent her these little comforters completely off.

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 3>Her own back.

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Didn't want anything for it, didn't want even want money

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 2>for the postage, just wanted to do something that was

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 2>so nice for someone else. And the thing that we

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 2>love more than anything is how incredible, no matter how big,

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 2>how small, how incredible it is that you guys all

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 2>band together to help each other out. This was just

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 2>such a little and sweet, active kindness that we wanted

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 2>to say, you know, we see it when it goes

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 2>down in the Facebook group, and we are so so grateful.

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, especially when Debra sent it and Melissa had said,

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, let me pay for the postage at least, like,

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>let me help you out, and she just literally said,

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:02.919
<v Speaker 1>don't worry about the money, take it as a gift

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>from a stranger. Buy yourself a coffee instead, enjoy your day.

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just the low key message, just not for attention,

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not for anything else.

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 3>It's just because you're good humans.

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Over the years, it's been so many small acts of

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 2>kindness that have gone down in the discussion group, big

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 2>and small, and so much of it happens without us

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 2>having to do anything. It's just between you guys, and

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 2>so we want to say that, even though we know

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 2>that it takes on a life of its own, we

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 2>see everything that happens and we love how much you

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 2>all support each other. Now, going from the absolute sweetest

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 2>of sweets too something a lot less sweet, you know,

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 2>or you might know if you've been following along on

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 2>the Gram.

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 3>It is fashion week at the moment. It is fashion week,

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 3>and I don't know if a lot of people care

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 3>or not.

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the vibe is in Australia anymore,

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:47.919
<v Speaker 1>but regardless, it's fashion weeks.

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Are you going? Are you partaking? How do you feel

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 2>about Fashion Week?

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I usually just do one show every Fashion Week. Actually

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't even think I went to last year, but

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the year before I only did one. Actually just pick

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite designers and I go. And this

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>year I'm actually going tonight just to one show with

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Kim who is one of my stylist's best friends. And

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to marrying Siddiq because I love her, I

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>wear her, and I want to support her as somebody

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that I know. She's an amazing Australian designer. So I'm

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>just going to my one show.

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think overall the interest in Fashion Week has

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 2>truly declined across Australia. I remember, like five or six

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 2>years ago the media coverage that it would receive the

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 2>amount of money that was poured into it as an event,

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 2>the calibra of like as in every single designer would

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 2>have a show at fashion Week, and now I think

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 2>over time it has become less and less and that's

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 2>because like brands have multiple ways now to show and

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 2>to get their collections out, and also because more brands

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 2>now are not just doing a summer and winter range,

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.600
<v Speaker 2>like a lot of collections are seasonal. They're based on

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 2>like six week or eight weekly drops. So I feel

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 2>like the fashion industry has evolved quite a bit now.

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 2>There's something that happened recently and I had a few

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 2>feelings about it. Brittain I were talking about it last

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 2>night and it was all around some leaked DMS between

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 2>an influencer and a fashion designer. I feel like if

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 2>you have been following fashion week over the last couple

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 2>of years, you probably have noticed that more and more

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 2>the people who are attending Australian Fashion Week are predominantly influencers.

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 2>And also there is been this huge shift over the

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 2>last couple of years where it is predominantly reality TV

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 2>stars as well. And I think that in the industry

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 2>there's a little bit of push and pull between die

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 2>hard fashion experts and that's what they live and breathe,

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 2>and then the reality TV people who come in attendance

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 2>each year.

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 3>So the article that.

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Came out last night was Carolina. You might remember her

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 2>from Maths. She's quite a controversial reality TV star and

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 2>I would say overall she hasn't been the most liked

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 2>reality TV star.

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't watch it, but I've read a lot

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>about her, and everything I've heard is that it was

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>very controversial, she had the affair.

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 3>People don't seem to love her.

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't make a personal comment because I don't know

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>her and I didn't watch it, but the general feedback

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been great around Paul Carolina.

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 2>And look, I mean, on one hand, we can say

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 2>was it the edit. On the other hand, we can

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:06.679
<v Speaker 2>say is it her as a person who knows because

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 2>none of us actually know.

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Who she is as a person.

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 2>But basically what happened was she had sent a DM

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 2>to Australian fashion label called Michael Losordo, now a very respected,

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 2>well to do, very successful fashion label who was putting

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 2>on a show at Australian Fashion Week. Anyway, the message

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 2>was this, Hi, team, I would love to watch your

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 2>show at the AAFW in Sydney on the fifteenth. Is

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 2>there any possibility I could get an invitation.

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Thank you. Now.

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 2>This is the response to the lead DMS. Hi Carolina,

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 2>thank you for your message. It would be, in my

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 2>view respectful to be supporting and following the brand's page

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 2>before asking for a free ticket or an inclusion to

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 2>the anniversary show. Now Carolina went on to write a

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 2>very big response to this. She wrote back saying, I'm

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 2>so sorry. I'm more than happy to follow. I truly

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 2>do love the brand. I actually come to check out

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 2>your new posts regularly. Please don't be offended. I only

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 2>follow three hundred or so people and they're my family

0:08:59.240 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 2>and friends.

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 3>And then she is.

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 2>It's a very long explanation, but basically, she said, the

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 2>reason why she only follows such a small amount of

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 2>people is because otherwise she misses those that are close

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 2>to her, and also because social media for her became

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 2>a place that wasn't good for her mental health, and

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 2>so therefore she wanted to keep her following small. The

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 2>reason why I know in depth the exchange between a

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 2>fashion brand and an influencer is because these dms, which

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 2>I would assume would be private dms, were released to

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Daily Mail and this was the headline. The headline was

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.959
<v Speaker 2>leaked emails reveal popular designers takedown of a reality TV

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 2>star begging for an invite to Australian Fashion Week show

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 2>before she's brutally turned down.

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 3>I think this is so shitty actually, of who of

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 3>the designer? I think that Okay, let's wind back a

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 3>little bit. What is happened here?

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>To summarize, Carolina wanted to go to Michael's show because

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>he's an amazing fashion designer. She obviously didn't have an invite,

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>so she slid into the DMS and said I'd love

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to attend. He's called her out because he's like, yeah,

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>don't even follow me, so it's a no. But that

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't enough. He then screenshot it and leaked it. The

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>way fashion week works is, I mean a lot of

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>influences are a lot of people in the public eye

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>or a lot of the fashionists.

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 3>They get direct invites from the brand.

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.199
<v Speaker 1>The brand will put a direct invite out saying I

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>know I want you there, so like please come.

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 3>But for everybody else that wants to.

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Attend, because people forget, there are a lot of just

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>people that everyday people that love to attend fashion week

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>because they love fashion. What happens is you register to go.

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>So you register, you fell out a form, you put

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>your occupation, you put what shows you want to go to,

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and then the brand will then say, yes, you can come.

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 3>You can get an invite. So that's generally how it works.

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.839
<v Speaker 1>So I think a Michael the designer is obviously a

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit pissed that. He's like, you haven't even gone

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>through the normal route, like you've DMed me directly. He's

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>probably pissed about that, which isn't something in my eyes

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to be pissed at at all. It's like, take it

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>as flattering.

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Why do you think because there's que a rising trend

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 2>of like influencers being entitled, like brand singing influences are entitled,

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 2>and therefore they shouldn't be asking for things like it's

0:10:58.280 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 2>entitled for them to ask.

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 3>So why do you think it's an.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 2>A big deal that she has kind of gone out

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 2>of her way to say, hey, give me a ticket.

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a big deal because I also

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's a big deal that he said no. So,

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>like you know, I live by a bit of a

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>motto of like in life, don't ask, don't get right.

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>You can ask, and it can be a no, but

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you could ask and it could be a yes. But

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>what I don't like here is she asked and it

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>was a no.

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 3>That's fine.

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>He has every right to say no. And at the

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, I think he should have said

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 1>no because she should have been following the brand. There's

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a simple rule. If you're gonna ask for something, you

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>show you support. If you loved them so much, you

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>show your support. And I say that because I know

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>that's happened to you and I Laura like, we get

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:35.959
<v Speaker 1>that a lot. Even with Life on Cut, we get

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people right to us saying absolutely love you,

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, love you both love the podcast, would love

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a guest on there, would love to send

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you a product, maybe you can talk about it. And

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you go on to their page and they don't follow

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Life on Cut, they don't follow you, they don't follow me,

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, do you even know who we are

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>or are you just going to every like publicity to

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>try And so there's a part of it that I

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>understand why he was like, come on, bro, like at

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 1>least following me. So that was dumb on her behalf.

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>She should have at least followed him. But I don't

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>see why this has gone any further. I don't see

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>why this exchange had to even leave the DMS. All

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>she has said is like fucking kissed his ass. All

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>she has said is I love you, I'd love to attend.

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>All he had to say was I don't want you there. No,

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know you probably should have followed me, which

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>is fine. That exchange is fine. Why then did you

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>have to go and I'm assuming sell it, or even

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>if you didn't sell the story, you've leaked it. Why

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>would you go and leak the article for any There's

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>no reason then to publicly humiliate someone.

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 3>I have so many feelings about this.

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 2>When I read it, I was like, oh, I think

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 2>it says a lot more about the brand than it

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 2>does about the influencer, and like, look, this is not

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 2>us being like, oh, let's support the influencers. Someone protect them.

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 2>I just think, like, it's very easy to hate on

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 2>an influencer. And I know, obviously because Carolina Santos. Maybe

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 2>she is not the most liked influencer after her time

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 2>on Mass, but she does have one hundred and thirty

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 2>five thousand followers. Brands use influencers to promote their products.

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 3>All brands do it.

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 2>It is an incredible effective and very very cut through

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 2>way of marketing and advertising. So I think it's a

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 2>bit rich to pick and choose in terms of course,

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 2>you can pick and choose who you want at your shows,

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 2>but I think it's a bit rich to pick and

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 2>choose who you will hang out to dry versus who

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 2>you're okay with collaborating with on your products. And I

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 2>think that the issue for me here is that because

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 2>she's not liked as a person, it's almost like it's

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 2>been Green Carter that it's okay to humiliate her, Like,

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 2>how dare she asks for something? Yes, I agree with you, Rich,

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 2>she should have been following the Instagram page. But there's

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 2>loads of brands that I wear and that I like,

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 2>and I'm not following their Instagram page, Like I'm not

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 2>supporting it on Instagram, but I support it with my

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 2>money totally.

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Don't You don't also write to them and ask for

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 3>something free?

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>And I'm assuming if you ever did that, which you wouldn't,

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you'd follow them totally totally.

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 2>In flip side to that, I speak about this from,

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, the aspect of someone who has worked in

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:53.839
<v Speaker 2>the world of influencing, brands ask for free things all

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 2>the time, from metaluces brands constantly, and I'm talking like

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 2>all brands from big to small, email and ask influencers

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 2>to promote products or do things for free and don't

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 2>respect that they have a huge platform an audience that

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 2>is actually their business that they can monetize on. So

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 2>I think it kind of goes both ways. And for me,

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 2>I think if you're a high fashion brand, if you're

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 2>someone who is trying to cement yourself as being premium

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 2>a luxurious product, why on earth would you want to

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 2>get down in the down and dirty of trying to

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 2>humiliate some influencer. It just makes you look like a bully.

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it makes the brand look premium. I

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 2>think it makes the brand look tacky that you've screenshot

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 2>these photos and then published them through Daily Mail. I

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 2>just I think it to me, the whole thing screens

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 2>of tackiness from the brand.

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's like what I said earlier in the episode

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>when I said if these sort of things hit different

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in Australia compared to the rest of the world. And

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>one thing I want to add to that is the

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>word influencer in Australia is a dirty word. We don't

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>see it as something that should garner any respect. We

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of almost say it like it's such a negative thing. Oh,

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>they're an influencer. They're just an influencer, where in other

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>countries around the world it is quite respected and influences

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>are the people that would be invited to the front

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>row of fashion events because the brands realize that these

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>are the people that are actually buying these products, and.

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 3>That is the thing.

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>These are the people that will wear these outfits that

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the fashion designers are promoting. So I don't understand why

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>there's all this hate towards them, But I thought this

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>was really interesting and I really really liked that she

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>came out and said it. So the ex Vogue editor,

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>her name is Christy Clements.

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Big deal. Obviously Vogue is big in fashion.

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>She has just come out in response to this year's

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Fashion Week and she said, I reckon they deserve to

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>be there as well, they being influencers. Quote, everyone has

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the right to participate and enjoy fashion Week. That's not

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>me being woke. That is the reality. Yes, fashion Week

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>is not quite as elite as it used to be.

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know what fashion is entertainment. The audience is

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>just as important as what is on the catwalk, and

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I personally love to see all different kinds of people

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>in the front row. Fashion can't afford to be like

0:15:57.600 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that anymore. It's a numbers game and it should be

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>so something that is enjoyed by everyone, regardless of what

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>their background is. I think that that is a brilliant

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>statement from someone that is in a respected fashion industry.

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I think the big thing that's different about

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 2>this is that we have people of different calibers. I

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 2>think because she comes one because not only is it

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 2>from reality TV, but because she was the reality TV villain,

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 2>it makes it easier to humiliate and hate on. But ultimately,

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 2>I think that social media has massively changed the dynamic

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 2>of fashion week because we do see the very front

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 2>row is now majority influencers, and a lot of them

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 2>have come from reality TV because they're almost instantaneous. Massive

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 2>audiences that they gain and the audiences that you gain

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 2>when you've done a reality TV show are hugely engaged audiences.

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Actually math and now the thing that I think where

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 2>this whole fashion industry is coming to a bit of

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 2>a tipping point in terms of like fashion week shows,

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 2>is that ten years ago, five years ago, it was elite.

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 2>We used to look in and you couldn't see behind

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 2>the wall. It was like untouchable. It was the Lara Bingals.

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 2>It was all the people who you looked in at

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 2>and you felt their world is so unattainable to my world.

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 2>But now it's full of people who you literally know

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 2>what they had for fucking breakfast because they posted on Instagram.

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 2>So the accessibility to it has changed. But I think

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 2>in this instance, whether you like Carolina or not, this

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 2>trend of trying to humiliate influencers for asking for something

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 2>that pertains to the industry that they're in, I think

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 2>is kind of low.

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 3>And we saw it last.

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Year with the young girl who asked a restaurant if

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 2>she could have a free meal in exchange for advertising.

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a bit rich if you have an

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 3>issue with.

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 2>An influencer asking, but there's no issue with a brand

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 2>asking an influencer for it. I think if we're going

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 2>to have an issue with it one way, then influencers

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 2>should also be able to say to brands, why are

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 2>you asking for stuff for free?

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, because you don't see influencers taking screenshots of

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>every brand insane and doc stop asking for free stuff.

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 4>Just stopping in because I actually just found this very

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 4>very interesting. I only looked this up as you guys.

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Were talking the website Social Blade.

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 4>It is this kind of algorithm program that analyzes the

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 4>percentage of engagement of influencers, and a lot of the

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:04.360
<v Speaker 4>time brands that will choose to work with influencers will

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 4>check the engagement rate of that particular influencer to see

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 4>whether their brand being advertised with them is worth it.

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 4>What would you say would be like a normal engagement

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 4>percentage for an influencer?

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh, no, you're asking the wrong person.

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean around about a three to four percent for

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 4>an influencer would be worth it in the brand's money wise.

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 3>It deemed as high. Yes, it sounds low, but it's

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 3>actually high.

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 4>Carolinas is only zero point six seven percent. So yeah,

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 4>she's got one hundred and thirty five thousand followers, But

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 4>when your engagement is zero point six seven percent, What

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean by this is that I think the reason

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 4>that this brand has decided to release this DM is

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 4>because I think that they're trying to create the allure

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 4>that they have integrity that to be a part of

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 4>that brand, you have to have integrity.

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, but the percentage has nothing to do with integrity.

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, I actually think it does, because it's kind of

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 4>her saying, you know, the exchange in that situation is

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 4>can I have some free tickets your fashion show?

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 3>I'll promote it on my Instagram.

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Like that's kind of the assumed exchange, right, If your

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 4>engagement is really low, that makes it less worthwhile for

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 4>a brand to say yes to that. They're trying to

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 4>out her, and I do think that they have absolutely

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 4>tried to humiliate her, But I do think that there

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 4>is a point to what they're saying. They're kind of saying, like,

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 4>you're not even following the brand, the engagement that we

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 4>would get, and also your reputation, these are.

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 3>All negative things to our brand.

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 2>But what I don't think is dance integrity is working

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 2>alongside Daily Mail and releasing dms. I think that that

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 2>so fundamentally lacks integrity that it does the opposite of

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 2>what they're trying to achieve, which is to say, how

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 2>dare this influencer think that they're so good that we

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 2>would give them a free ticket? It's like, but you

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 2>are so you are so petty. It's definitely not that

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 2>you released it to Daily Mail. I think it kind

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 2>of like underes exactly what they're trying to achieve by

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 2>being that petty. Ultimately, anyway, before we get into answering

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 2>all your deeper dark and your burning questions, it is

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 2>time for Vibe and Unsubscribed, and Keisha has a very

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 2>good one today.

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 4>Also, I just wanted to quickly say, we get a

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 4>lot of posts, and we get a lot of messages

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 4>to the Instagram sorry, posting the Facebook group asking like

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 4>what was that thing that Laura recommended or what was

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 4>that thing Britt was talking about. I do try to

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 4>link them in the show notes, so you should be

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 4>able to tap on the show notes in the episode

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 4>and actually go straight to whatever the vibe or unsubscribed.

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, maybe we need to start putting them in the

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 3>discussion group as well. Oh not a bad idea. Hey,

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 3>you'll get onto that.

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 4>My Vibe for the Week is actually an episode of

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 4>the podcast The Briefing, and this is with jan Friend,

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 4>who you might have known if you came to the

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 4>live show.

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 3>She was one of our wonderful guests.

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 4>Jen did an episode of the Briefing with a British

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 4>historian named Cindy McCreary. And do you guys know the

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:42.679
<v Speaker 4>show on Netflix at the moment, Queen Charlotte. It's the

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 4>Bridgeton spinoff.

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Sure do, Yeah, it's like.

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 4>The number one show, right, So it's all about Queen

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 4>Charlotte and how she fell in love with King George

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 4>of England. Now they are real people in history, right,

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 4>so eighteenth century history. This whole episode, it's titled, was

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 4>Queen Charlotte, the UK's first Black Queen, and that is

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 4>because the queen in the Netflix depiction is black. And

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 4>when Bridgeton initially came out with this color blind casting,

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 4>everyone was like, this is great, we need more diversity,

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 4>blah blah blah. But this podcast episode actually kind of

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 4>unpacks a little bit more of like the nuance of

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 4>is it problematic to have a color blind casting when

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:24.439
<v Speaker 4>it is so not representative of what actually happened, you know,

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 4>the black experience at the time. It also ignores all

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 4>of the slavery, and she kind of goes into how

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 4>she thinks these things are really great because they're very entertaining,

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 4>and it kind of touches on some of the cultural

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 4>things at the time, But is it problematic to ignore

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 4>the hardships that people then face.

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 3>It's really ignoring the.

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 4>Fact that like black people at the time did not

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 4>have status, they didn't have opulent wealth, you know, that

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of thing.

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 2>And it also could potentially run the risk of reshaping

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 2>people's frame of mind around history, especially people who are

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 2>viewing it or watching anything about Who's watching Bridgitton though,

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 2>and then thinking this is it's true?

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 4>And I think people know it's labeled as fiction based

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 4>on fact, and that's where I think it's interesting that

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 4>they've used the real character names of people who actually

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 4>existed in history. That's where I think it gets a

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 4>bit muddy. Anyway, this whole episode goes into the real

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 4>history of Charlotte, whether she did have African heritage or not.

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 4>It's just super interesting. It's not like too opinionated. It's

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 4>not like you should or shouldn't enjoy these TV series.

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 4>It's just like you should probably just be aware that

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.479
<v Speaker 4>you know these things can shape your perception of history.

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 4>So I really like it. I'll link it in the

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 4>show notes. Jan Friend of briefing it was excellent.

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, mine is way less progressive. My vibe this week

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>is called Jury Duty. Now I know you've seen it, Keisha.

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>It is also something that is absolutely trending.

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:45.199
<v Speaker 3>I actually haven't seen it.

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 4>My housemate has been watching it, so I've seen bits

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 4>and pieces as I've walked past the lounge room.

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 3>He's obsessed. He cannot stop watching it.

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>It's on Prime, so Amazon Prime, and if you haven't

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>heard of it, it is. It's with James Marsden as

0:22:59.320 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>the lead. Now.

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.640
<v Speaker 3>I have crushed on James mars my whole life. He's beautiful.

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I got to interview over someone and he's just as

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>beautiful in real life. But what it is is it's

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the inner workings of the judicial system. So it shows

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you all the jurors. It has bailiffs and judges and

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the person that's on trial, and James Marsden plays himself.

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>It's supposed to be a real trial. Turns out this

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>whole cast is an actor. There's only one person in

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the whole show that's not an actor, and that is

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the jurors. He thinks he's been summoned from

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the public. He's just an American guy. He thinks he's

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:35.199
<v Speaker 1>been summoned and he has no idea that the whole

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>thing is fake. Every single person is an actor and

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the shit that they that they put this poor guy

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>through the stories and that everything gets so crazy and

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>the whole idea is just to watch his reaction.

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 3>It's unlike anything you've seen.

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:52.439
<v Speaker 2>But how it feels like the Truman Show. How on

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 2>earth could it is? But how can that be legal?

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 2>In terms of filming someone without them consenting to being

0:23:57.760 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 2>filmed in a reality TV?

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:01.640
<v Speaker 4>I actually can answer this. So you have to sign

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.199
<v Speaker 4>consent after the fact. It's the same with radio. You

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 4>can record someone without them knowing, but you can't air it.

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 3>He knows he's being filmed.

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.400
<v Speaker 1>He thinks he's part of a real situation and they're

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>filming it because they are going to show the world

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 1>what it's like. They bring all these jurism, They're like, hey, guys,

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna all be filmed. We're going to show what

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>it's like going through this process. But he just doesn't

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>know that everyone's an actor and he's the only person.

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 3>That's not in on it.

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 4>So they're like setting him up, so he thinks it's

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 4>a documentary. But so they kind of throw questions at

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 4>him and correct me if I'm wrong, because I haven't

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 4>seen all of it. But like people on the show

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 4>will be like, hey, bro, I need you to do

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 4>this favor for me, like I need money or like

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 4>they basically it's like a human experiment. They're testing how

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 4>far they can push this guy and just waiting to

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 4>see whether he'll crack or whether he'll be a good

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 4>person or not.

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 2>I just wonder, like, what have you got to the

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:48.439
<v Speaker 2>end of it, and he was like, no, fuck you,

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to be the lead role in some

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 2>TV show.

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know it was being filmed. Imagine if that

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 3>was the outcome back. I just throwing a couple extra dollars.

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure that's what.

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's all this stuff on TikTok at the moment

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 4>though about whether he knew, like whether he is also

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 4>an actor or not.

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 3>There's all conspiracies he's in on it.

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people are starting to say, nah, he's

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>an actor that has to pretend he didn't know. But

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'm I'm, you know, the optimist in

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:11.360
<v Speaker 1>mine forever, the optimist.

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 3>I want to think that it's true.

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 4>Apparently he comes off as just being like the best

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 4>guy ever he is.

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:16.120
<v Speaker 3>He's amazing.

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>He's amazing, and everyone asked him to do stupid shit

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and his responses is always so good, and he's always

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 1>so loving and helpful, and he's just like, I haven't

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>seen the end yet, but watch it if you're wanting

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>something different and a bit of a laugh. That's Jury

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Duty on Amazon Prime, not sponsored.

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Just love it. Question number one.

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting married in November and some people are assuming

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>they're invited to my wedding. I'm talking the borderline friends

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that you know you kind of only see once or

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>twice a year. They're saying things like, I can't wait

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>for your wedding. Have you finished the guest list yet?

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.719
<v Speaker 1>It makes me super uncomfortable because they're not invited, But

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how to respond, so I just awkwardly laugh.

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>It was recently my birthday and someone said, I just

0:25:57.320 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 1>can't wait to see you walk down the aisle.

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 3>But she's not on my list on your Instagram?

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Do I need to wait for people's disappointment when they

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>don't get an invite? Or do I tell them now

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have enough space? Do I tell them

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>not on my listsl.

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 2>How many friends do you have that think they're better

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 2>friends with you than you are with them.

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Apparently a lot. It makes me wildly uncomfortable. IHI, okay,

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>if this was me, actually this was me, this is me.

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 3>I did this. I did this in November last year.

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Guys, I think you just tell people you're having a

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 2>smaller wedding, Like, you have to be honest if you're

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 2>not inviting people in the.

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Two hundred people on the Instagram and you're like, but

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 3>by smaller men, just like small enough that you couldn't

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 3>be invited. I'm in a small army.

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 3>I think you have to be honest.

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:42.160
<v Speaker 2>You can't just not invite them and then wait until

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 2>it's closer to the wedding and then they've figured it out.

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Because I did that. And then I had a friend

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 2>who was like, Hey, when am I gonna get my invite?

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 2>And I was like, oh, yeah, the invite, So what

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 2>did you do.

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 3>Invited her? See, this is exactly what not to do.

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 3>Don't follow me Lawa's footsteps. You don't.

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>You don't leave it so long there so awkward that

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>you have to sympathy invite them.

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 2>To be fair, though, it was like literally a week

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 2>out from the wedding and she was like, hey, was

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.439
<v Speaker 2>that me? No, oh my god, you got your invite. No,

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't even a week. It was like just before.

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 3>And I was like, we haven't. Why do you think happened?

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 3>It's next week.

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 2>But also like it wasn't someone who I'd sent a

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 2>save the date to. It was like a really rogue

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.679
<v Speaker 2>out of nowhere, Like I understand if you've gotten to

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 2>save the date then didn't get the invitation in the mail.

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 2>I was like, I get that, but this was like

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 2>someone who I had not seen in years, not spoken

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 2>to in years, and they were from kind of a

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 2>past life, and they messaged and were like, hey, like

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 2>can't wait to see you.

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 3>When's the wedding?

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>And you haven't gotten wow a save the date, a message,

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.959
<v Speaker 1>a call, a conversation. If you haven't got a carrier pigeon,

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you haven't had a Morse code smoke signals delivered to

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>your house, don't bring it up. Okay Wait I had

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to even write back, sorry, who is this because I

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:00.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't have their number saved. That's how random that one was. Okay, anyway,

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>this is not helping.

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 3>De ceased, I feel, so I need to know.

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Wait you invited them, well kind of, but then they

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't come, so it all got awkward.

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 3>It got so awkward anyway, I'm a conflict avoidant. You

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 3>know this. Have you spoken to them since? No? I

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 3>love we'll get into your detrauma. Now let's answer this

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 3>poor girl's question.

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think okay, I feel really uncomfortable listening to

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>this because I also don't like conflict. First of all,

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to start from those people that are listening.

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even going to answer this girl's question straight away.

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>We'll come back to that the people listening, because this

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 1>goes to everybody. If your friend or someone you know

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>in your stratosphere is getting married, my advice is to

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>never go to them and say I can't wait for

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the wedding. Don't ever assume anything because you don't know

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>someone's circumstances. I think the best thing to say is like,

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>are you so excited? Have you picked your dress yet?

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>What are you thinking?

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Like be engaged if.

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>You're a friend, But don't put somebody on the spot

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and be like, so do I pick my bridesmaid's dress.

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Or you for me? Like, don't don't assume anything.

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>That's where I want to start, like make it easier

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>for the couple getting married.

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 2>I think you can assume if you're a best friend,

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 2>that you're going to be invited to their wed unless

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 2>they're not having a wedding and they're eloping.

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 3>I think you can assume.

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 2>But if you're someone who is like on the periphery

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 2>of the friendship, like it's an acquaintance that someone you

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 2>see like once every six months, if your numbers not saved, yeah,

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 2>if your numbers not saved in their phone, if you're

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 2>not friends on Instagram, I think that you can't just assume.

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 2>But also that doesn't help because obviously these people have assumed,

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 2>which just means that people feel like they're closer to

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 2>you than you do to them.

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 3>You have to be honest.

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 2>I think you have to say, oh, look, we're having

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a smaller wedding, get ahead of it.

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 2>I think say, you know, maybe we're going to do

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 2>a dinner beforehand. We'd love you to come to this

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 2>or something. But you do have to be honest because.

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Essentially, if they are expecting that they're coming, if they

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 1>have already brought it up with you and you've laughed

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it off or whatever, that almost solidifies to them that

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>they are coming, the fact that you didn't say anything

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. Send it, don't save the date,

0:29:57.400 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>send them a card that's like, don't worry about saving this.

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 3>You'll be free do whatever you like.

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>A laugh off is an acceptance. Basically you've accepted their RSVP.

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>When you laugh, you accepted their RVP. So now you

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>need to unlaugh and probably tell them and just explain.

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to be honest, like you're not close

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>enough to me, but you can say, we're really tired

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>with numbers. I would love if you want them to

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>would love you to come to like the pre party,

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>whether that's the hens or maybe you're just going to

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe you throw a little get together before for people

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that can't make it. But I think you just really

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>need to be honest because economically, there's a lot of reasons,

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>but economically we don't live in a time anymore where

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you can just say, oh, I just add these people

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>onto the wedding because I feel uncomfortable because it's weddings

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>are so expensive, and when you're paying for people per head,

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to make sure that you're filled with people

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that you genuinely really want to be there and it

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is your day, and you do hopefully only have one

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of them, so you need to be pretty true to yourself.

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 1>But the longer you leave it, the more chance you'll have.

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Of any number. Like Laura, I.

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Want to say something from my own experience, because I

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 2>am so deeply conflict avoidant that by avoiding conflicts or

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 2>things that I perceive as being conflicts, I only make

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 2>the situation worse.

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Like I'm avoiding an email at the.

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Moment that I should have sent three months ago and

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 2>it would have been completely fine at the time, but

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 2>now when I send it, it's going to be a problem.

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 3>And I know that, and so I'm continuing to avoid it.

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 3>You did that with your wedding as well. I remember

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 3>we had this convo on regarding your wedding dress. Oh yeah,

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 3>about my wedding dress.

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Ye.

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't like disappointing people, and so therefore I delay

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 2>that conversation so much. But there comes this tipping point.

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 2>The tipping point is when you delay something to a

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 2>point where it becomes so much more of a big deal.

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 2>And I think the thing is is once you've sent

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 2>out your invitations and then someone kind of assumes they're coming,

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 2>but then they don't know they didn't get an invitation.

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Now they feel like you haven't spoken to them. It

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 2>just creates a bigger situation than necessary. And I think

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 2>the easiest way to get on the front foot with

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 2>this is just to put on your big girl panties

0:31:57.400 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 2>and say to your friend or whoever it is you

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 2>loose acquaintance. You know, I would love for you to

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:03.719
<v Speaker 2>be able to calm, but unfortunately we have to keep

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 2>numbers small.

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 3>And I hope that that you know, I hope it

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 3>doesn't upset you.

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 2>But you know, if we could have you there, we

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 2>would love to have you there, little white light, even

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 2>though you don't.

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Want them all to send you a picture. Yeah, And

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 3>I think that that's the easiest way of going about it.

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 2>But I think don't ignore things so much that then

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 2>they become bigger than they need to total.

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 3>And I speak from experience. It's bad idea.

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, I feel like that that is kind of the

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>best advice we can give on this question.

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Number two, hit me, what would you do in this situation?

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Our next door neighbor is a sex worker, and we

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 2>have a four month old newborn baby. Read we are

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 2>sleep deprived exhausted, overwhelmed all the things. We are on

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 2>a first name basis, but we don't know her that well.

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 2>She hasn't explicitly told us that she's a sex worker,

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 2>just that there has been a ramp up in the

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 2>number of people coming over to her place and there

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 2>is sex noises at all hours of the day and night.

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 2>So we went looking on Instagram and found her professional page.

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 2>We aren't prudes and don't have an issue with sex work.

0:32:56.240 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>It's just really, really really loud, a lot of banking,

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of whipping, and mostly a lot of loud moaning.

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Our units share an adjoining wall with our bedroom where

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the baby sleeps in with us, and the garage where

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>we figured out some of the action takes place, is

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>basically less than ten meters from our bedroom window. This

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>is a problem because on the rare occasions we get

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to sleep, we are now kept awake by the noise.

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm conscious it's her job, though, so what can we

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>do vice versa. I'm sure a crying baby probably isn't

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the best for her business.

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 3>Help what is this alution? I think definitely like this

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 3>works both ways. A crying baby's killing her vibe as well.

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure that the sexy noises are killing your

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 1>vibe when you're trying to sleep and with your baby.

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the sex part probably has nothing to do

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>with it. The sex work apart. I think it's the

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>fact that there is someone working from home that's obnoxiously loud.

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Like if your next door neighbor is in a band

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and they're practicing on the drums all day, or you know,

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>or DJ deck that's trying it's the same thing.

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 3>They're working from home, but it's interrupting you.

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Or if you're just like your neighbor's just gone into

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a new relationship, is bang until the cows come home?

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Being allowed about it same thing.

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the only thing you can do here, apart

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 1>from moving, which you probably don't want to do, I

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:10.239
<v Speaker 1>think the only thing you can do is what you

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>do in this situation, like literally take away that the

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's sex work. You can write a note

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:17.839
<v Speaker 1>or go over and speak to them and maybe talk

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 1>about a way that you can both work around it.

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Are there different hours that.

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>You could both do, or is there a way that

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe you can explain that it's keeping your baby up?

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Can you keep it down between ten and eleven because

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the only time that they have a nap. Like,

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:34.879
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely ways. Again, I really think the sex part

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:36.359
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with it. I think it's just

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>your next door neighbors really loud. You can have that

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 1>conversation because we have people the time writing saying that

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 1>they slip notes under their neighbor's door.

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Because they have sex too loud. Like there are always

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 3>these kind of things.

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:48.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I think it's a bit different when like

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 2>you can't say, hey, can you work around and not

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 2>work these hours because I guess like she's probably on

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:56.879
<v Speaker 2>call or they're probably on call for the time that's needed,

0:34:56.920 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean, like they're not gonna be like, nah,

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:00.839
<v Speaker 2>do no work between ten and you.

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Know, maybe she could line up the orgasm part for

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>like the nap time, so like climax at the peak naptime.

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Maybe make her aware that the acoustics in the apartment

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 2>aren't great so she could get some more soft furnishings.

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Maybe, like that could be a good solution.

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 1>You can't put soundproofing in probably wouldn't look great.

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Like you're fucking in a studio.

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like you have soundproofing in here right now? Like

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just foam. You could add a little bit of

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>extra soundproofing. I reckon this could go a long way

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 1>for lots of different reasons. Make it feel like a

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:30.320
<v Speaker 1>bit of a sex dungeon.

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Look, I think you hit the nail on the head

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 2>though in respect, like because on one hand, yes, she's

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:37.879
<v Speaker 2>keeping you awake, but I'm sure if you can hear

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 2>her having sex, she can hear your screaming baby, and

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 2>that is probably just as frustrating, if not more frustrating

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 2>at times as well. But I think that you probably

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 2>can't do a hell of a lot. I looked into

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 2>this because I was like, can you run sex work

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 2>from your own house? Like, is there some sort of

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 2>legalities around this? But it turns out as a sex worker,

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 2>you can run your business, You can work from home

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 2>as a sex worker. He just can't do it if

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 2>there's multiple people, So multiple sex workers working from the

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 2>same home, because then that kind of blurs the lines

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 2>as to what constitutes a brothel.

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 3>So you can still do an orgy.

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:12.359
<v Speaker 1>If there's only one paid sex workers, all right, because

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>there's multiple people there, but there's only the one worker.

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 3>I did not look into it, but that's a high

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 3>level detail.

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 1>What I do.

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 2>What I mean is is like, for example, if we

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 2>both were sex workers, we couldn't live together and both

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 2>work out of the same apartment. Like you can't live

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 2>with a friend and both do the same thing, because

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 2>it's so weird.

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Why is that?

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Because then it turns into potentially a brothel, like the

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 2>rules around it are kind of shifted. Anyway, Look, this

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 2>is very top line guys, I'm giving you right now.

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:38.799
<v Speaker 2>This is not the high level information, but the reason

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 2>why I wanted to look into that because my very

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:42.279
<v Speaker 2>first thought was, oh my god, are they allowed to

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:43.800
<v Speaker 2>do that, Like you're in the middle of suburbia?

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 3>Is that legally okay? But it seems like it is.

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 2>I think the best thing that you can do is

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:51.759
<v Speaker 2>go and get yourself like a white noise machine or

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 2>something that's going to interrupt the noise from within your bedroom.

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Can't control what they're doing in their house and they

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 2>have to make an income that you can control what's

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 2>going on in your apartment. So maybe you need to

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 2>figure out if you can get better soundproofing in your apartment,

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:08.320
<v Speaker 2>or maybe you need to get a white noise machine.

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:10.879
<v Speaker 2>So at least if you know they're going the whole

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:12.319
<v Speaker 2>hog you can't hear it.

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I agree, but I still think you can have a

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>conversation with your neighbor. I think you can still say, hey,

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 1>is there any way we can work around or like,

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about the noise.

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if you know it's good for you,

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 3>but it's really loud. But what are they going to

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 3>say because they can't really say to their clients, hey,

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 3>could you just keep it down a bit? I know

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 3>you're having good time and you're almost there, but ca me.

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Just I mean, what if there's a small chance, small

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:34.320
<v Speaker 1>there could be a small chance that they don't actually

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 1>know how far the sound is traveling next door because

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>some buildings have great insulation and some don't, so there

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:41.879
<v Speaker 1>is a small chance that they have no idea. Maybe

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>if you tell them, they're like, oh my god, I'm

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>so sorry. I didn't know that you could hear every

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>single thing.

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:46.359
<v Speaker 3>You don't know.

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:48.840
<v Speaker 1>So I always think it's best to have a conversation

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>at the start. I'm not saying this is an easy conversation,

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 1>but it is so all good. High Sorry, I just

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>want to let you know I can hear you spanking yeah.

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Time ten o'clock that you whip. You got going great guns,

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:01.439
<v Speaker 3>but it's fair. Yeah, what do you got to lose?

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Try and think of what I'd prefer like as my neighbor.

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 1>If I would prefer a baby next or crying all

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the time, or sex all the sex?

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:08.839
<v Speaker 3>I prefer sex.

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:12.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'd rather way where I listen to that as

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>like my bedtime lullaby than a screaming baby. WHI Yeah,

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I would have no issue with listening to other people

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 1>have sex, but listening to someone else's baby scream through

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the night gives me wild anxiety.

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 3>And also because.

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm now attuned to crying baby, so it wakes me

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:29.720
<v Speaker 2>up instantly.

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 3>If someone was having sex, I'd be like, what's that noise?

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 3>What is that for? Bad? That's an unrecognizable sound? Have

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 3>I made the gates of head? Is there a rhinoceros

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 3>in the backyard? What's going on babe? Anyway? Okay? Next question,

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 3>what kind of sex do you have? Okay? Third question?

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 2>Are terms of endearment in the workplace ever appropriate? I

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 2>work closely with the team of five people in an organization.

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 2>My colleague often calls me duhl and it makes me

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 2>feel very uncomfortable. But she never calls anyone else from

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:02.359
<v Speaker 2>my team. This only me and it started approximately three

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 2>weeks after I started the job, when we had a

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:09.280
<v Speaker 2>disagreement about something. Am I being ridiculous? Is this actually normal?

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 2>Are my feelings valid? I don't know how to address this.

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 2>She's currently going through a very tough time in her

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 2>personal life, and I feel like if I was to

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:19.760
<v Speaker 2>broach this with my manager, it would not be received well.

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it's also important to note that she is young,

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 2>so it's not a generational habit.

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 3>I call everyone terms of endearment. Is this feels very appointed?

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 3>I call everyone like, No.

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 1>There's different terms of endearment that hit differently. I'm a

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 1>big love, Hey Love, Hi Love, I do.

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 3>It all the time. Do you think love is on

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 3>equal par with Dahl? Though? Hey don't.

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Love and Dahl they both seem to condescending. But

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Dahl and sweetheart, I say, Han.

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 3>You're a big Han. I've started.

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I've started saying Han because of you, and I don't

0:39:50.800 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 1>like it. Hey Han, I say to Keisha now, But

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Keisha's the only person I say it too, because she's

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 1>our only employee's my friends, I think because you say

0:39:58.320 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>it so much it's started to come out of my mouth.

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:01.800
<v Speaker 3>And I did yesterday and I was like, I don't

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 3>like that.

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:04.840
<v Speaker 4>I think it's fine verbally, but when I see it

0:40:04.880 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 4>in message, because I know you guys, I know it's

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 4>not patronizing. But if someone I didn't know that well

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 4>called me han, I'd be like, fuck off.

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 2>I say lovely, though in message I change it, I

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 2>say Hanna or lovely.

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Hi lovely.

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:21.440
<v Speaker 4>I think if the person's younger than me, it's super weird.

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:23.800
<v Speaker 1>The thing is, it is very patronizing. And I was

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>always brought up that way that you respect your elders,

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and calling your elders Dahl is patronizing.

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 3>That's the way it was brought up, and it does.

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>If somebody younger came up to me and said, hey, Dahl,

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it's fine, but I'd be like, I don't know about that.

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 3>I don't know the situation. I don't think it would

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:41.320
<v Speaker 3>be intentional.

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think she started saying it after a disagreement,

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>is in like I'm gonna show you Dahl.

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:48.839
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's like I'm gonna get you back, dull.

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Do you know what it could be the absolute opposite.

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 2>You may have had a disagreement, and she may be

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 2>trying to compensate and make you feel that. She doesn't

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 2>want you to misinterpret her. It doesn't want you to

0:40:58.000 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 2>think that she doesn't like you, and so therefore she's

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 2>almost going a little.

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Bit too far.

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 2>And now you feel like it's been done because it's

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:06.719
<v Speaker 2>a very I mean calling someone dal or calling someone hunt.

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 3>That's not the first point of call.

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 2>If you hate someone, you I mean like, you're actually

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 2>not going to do that if you dislike someone. If anything,

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 2>if you dislike someone, you're probably more inclined to not

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 2>give them any term of endeement at all. So I

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:20.239
<v Speaker 2>feel like she may be doing it out of a

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 2>way to try and like overcompensate for a disagreement that

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 2>you've had, and you've interpreted it as though it's patronizing. Potentially,

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:29.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm potentially looking at this as Devil's advocate.

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:31.719
<v Speaker 1>What this is about is you don't like it. It's

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 1>making you very uncomfortable. You've literally said very uncomfortable. So

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:37.279
<v Speaker 1>that's what you have to address here, is you don't

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 1>want to be addressed like that. Outside of telling her that,

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what you can do besides sitting down

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:46.279
<v Speaker 1>and saying my name, Sharon, like, call me by my name.

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:47.879
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what else you're gonna do, Like, can

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 3>I okay?

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of experience, I am someone who is guilty of

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:53.839
<v Speaker 2>calling people not by their name.

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:56.040
<v Speaker 3>I always call people hun or lovely.

0:41:56.680 --> 0:41:58.719
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I use dial but I always use

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:01.880
<v Speaker 2>terms of endeement in a patronizing way, or if it

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:04.799
<v Speaker 2>comes across as patronizing to someone that's been interpreted as that.

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 2>The intention behind it was never to be patronizing. If anything,

0:42:09.120 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 2>it's almost to like fast track a friendship. That's I

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:13.879
<v Speaker 2>guess for me the reason why I would do it.

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 2>But I think for ninety percent of people it fast

0:42:17.160 --> 0:42:19.239
<v Speaker 2>tracks the friendship. And maybe for ten percent of people

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:21.719
<v Speaker 2>who don't know me, who maybe have interpreted me not

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 2>the way that I intended it, maybe they think I'm

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 2>being patronizing. And I also think it depends on the

0:42:26.600 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 2>position of power that you hold in the role. This

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 2>happened to me in radio and you were there, Britt

0:42:30.960 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 2>one of our co workers. I called him buddy, and

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:38.280
<v Speaker 2>that in no way Kesha's like laughing. I was like, hey, buddy,

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 2>thanks said like that, and he sham, thanks muscles. Oh, see,

0:42:42.520 --> 0:42:44.319
<v Speaker 2>I would never call someone champ and I would never

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 2>call someone muscles. But like buddy to me is that

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 2>didn't even register that that was bad because like I,

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:51.320
<v Speaker 2>for example, wouldn't like being called legend.

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 3>I find that much. I called the same guy you

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 3>called him buddy.

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:56.319
<v Speaker 2>I called him legend and he liked legend, but he

0:42:56.320 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 2>didn't like buddy, and I find legend patronized, so I

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 2>think it's very very subject. His response was, hey, don't

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 2>call me buddy, and I was like, cool, never will again.

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:08.920
<v Speaker 3>And we had a laugh about it, but he loved Ledge.

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:10.799
<v Speaker 2>We had a laugh about it, and that was it,

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, And now you know, we became Instagram friends

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 2>and I was like, hey, Buddy, how you doing. But

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 2>isn't it very interesting though that one person was fine

0:43:16.760 --> 0:43:19.279
<v Speaker 2>with Ledge but they weren't fine with totally. It's all

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 2>very personal, and I think ultimately, if you dislike a

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 2>term of endearment that someone's saying, regardless of the intention

0:43:26.280 --> 0:43:29.000
<v Speaker 2>behind it, it's okay to say, hey, can you not

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 2>call me dahl?

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:31.239
<v Speaker 3>I don't really like it. It makes me feel a

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:32.320
<v Speaker 3>little bit weird.

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 2>It's so fine to say that, And I don't think

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:38.000
<v Speaker 2>that that needs to be confrontational. I didn't find it confrontational.

0:43:38.040 --> 0:43:40.400
<v Speaker 2>When in my workplace someone said that they didn't like

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:42.239
<v Speaker 2>being called buddy, I just went, yeah, no worries, and

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:44.840
<v Speaker 2>I've never called them buddy since. If something makes you uncomfortable,

0:43:44.880 --> 0:43:47.440
<v Speaker 2>it's okay to verbalize it. I don't think you need

0:43:47.480 --> 0:43:50.480
<v Speaker 2>to go to their manager or to HR because by

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 2>doing that you're escalating a situation and making it seem

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:54.840
<v Speaker 2>like it's ten times worse than what it really is.

0:43:54.920 --> 0:43:56.360
<v Speaker 2>I think the first point of call is just the

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 2>next time she says it, just turn around and say,

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 2>it makes me feel so weird you call me dahal.

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Can you just call me Sarah. It's all you have

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 2>to say.

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Just say, hey, my grand calls me dall. It's weird

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:06.759
<v Speaker 3>when you do it.

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:09.880
<v Speaker 2>If it is something that makes people uncomfortable, just say

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 2>ninety percent of people are fine and ten percent of

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:13.640
<v Speaker 2>people are uncomfortable. By terms of you know, names of

0:44:13.680 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 2>endearment in the workplace, Do you think it should just

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:18.880
<v Speaker 2>be a blanket rule that we don't use it, because

0:44:18.880 --> 0:44:21.319
<v Speaker 2>I think we're trying to now assess does this person

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:21.600
<v Speaker 2>like this?

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Does this person not like this?

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Do we think it's just a bit inappropriate and maybe

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:27.960
<v Speaker 2>we have become too casual with our work colleagues.

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:29.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's the sort of thing that you

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:31.400
<v Speaker 1>can put into every work contract ever, that it's like,

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:33.399
<v Speaker 1>don't ever use a term of endearment. I don't think

0:44:33.440 --> 0:44:34.799
<v Speaker 1>that's it. I think it's just going to have to

0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:36.720
<v Speaker 1>be a tone is going to have to be set

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:40.239
<v Speaker 1>by the management at whatever job you partake in, and

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:42.799
<v Speaker 1>they'll set the interactions at work by the way that

0:44:42.800 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>they behave the way the way they speak to you,

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:47.279
<v Speaker 1>by the way they address you in emails, by are

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you going out and having this really close intimate.

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Relationship outside of work.

0:44:51.040 --> 0:44:52.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it can be a blanket statement where

0:44:53.040 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 1>no one in Australia, in any workforce can use a

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:57.560
<v Speaker 1>term of endement because workforces are so different, Like, look

0:44:57.600 --> 0:44:59.880
<v Speaker 1>at the way we work together. It's different to when

0:44:59.920 --> 0:45:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I worked in a hospital, for example, Like you wouldn't

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:03.840
<v Speaker 1>speak like that in the hospital. You would never go

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:06.879
<v Speaker 1>and have a conversation with a surgeon and the operating theater.

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't walk in and say, hey.

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Han were ready to cut and open and get this

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:14.800
<v Speaker 3>gall bladder out? Or what like you would conversation.

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:17.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's it's hard to say it's a

0:45:17.360 --> 0:45:19.600
<v Speaker 1>blanket rule, and it's got to be something that you feel.

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I definitely don't speak to elders in that way because

0:45:23.080 --> 0:45:25.399
<v Speaker 1>I was brought up and I feel like it's patronizing,

0:45:25.440 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 1>so I would never do it.

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 3>I completely agree.

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:30.560
<v Speaker 4>I think it's the level of professionalism of the workplace

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 4>almost entirely. So like if you work in law, if

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:36.839
<v Speaker 4>you work in like a more professional environment, I.

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Think that in terms of endearment would be a no no.

0:45:40.120 --> 0:45:41.839
<v Speaker 3>But I mean we will talk about our sex lives

0:45:41.880 --> 0:45:42.879
<v Speaker 3>for a job, so like of.

0:45:42.840 --> 0:45:45.799
<v Speaker 4>Course it's a little bit more accepted for us to

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 4>just be more casual with our language.

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I've just pictured like there's been a court of law

0:45:49.560 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, han, I disagree, Like they're putting their

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 1>hammer down.

0:45:53.640 --> 0:45:54.960
<v Speaker 3>It's not even a hammer, whatever it's called.

0:45:54.960 --> 0:45:57.000
<v Speaker 4>But I also think it depends on the person who's

0:45:57.000 --> 0:45:59.560
<v Speaker 4>saying it, Like let's picture it was a Let's say,

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:02.440
<v Speaker 4>was one of our male radio bosses, who's you know,

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:06.160
<v Speaker 4>in fifties or sixties here coming and calling me hey

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:08.279
<v Speaker 4>han blah blah blah. I'd be like I don't really

0:46:08.320 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 4>know you that well, Like I feel like it's a

0:46:09.920 --> 0:46:11.880
<v Speaker 4>little bit weird that you're calling me that, whereas with

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 4>you guys who are my immediate bosses.

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 3>You would call me that and I would like it.

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it depends on who it is. I

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 3>also think it's like anything, it's the way you deliver it.

0:46:19.600 --> 0:46:22.279
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, in Australia we always use this as

0:46:22.320 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>an example, but mate, the word mate can mean ten

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:27.320
<v Speaker 1>different things.

0:46:27.560 --> 0:46:28.279
<v Speaker 3>By the way you say.

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:32.680
<v Speaker 1>You can be like mate, mate, don't fuck with me,

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:34.880
<v Speaker 1>or like mate, like you know what I mean. It's

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the way you deliver it. And I think Han and

0:46:37.239 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Duhl is the same thing. It's the way you deliver

0:46:39.239 --> 0:46:40.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're like, hey, Han, just wondering are you going

0:46:41.040 --> 0:46:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to be coming to dinner tonight, or like Han, I

0:46:44.440 --> 0:46:46.480
<v Speaker 1>told you to get those documents to me at three o'clock.

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Where are they? So it's definitely it's a multitude of things.

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, I don't think

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:53.719
<v Speaker 1>that's something that we can police. I think it's something

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that comes down to the individual and you feel uncomfortable

0:46:55.880 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in your environment by this particular person, so just tell them.

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:00.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it has to be as big a

0:47:00.480 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 3>deal as you think it is.

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:03.080
<v Speaker 2>But then it comes back to the same thing that

0:47:03.120 --> 0:47:06.000
<v Speaker 2>we talked about with the wedding invitations. We're so conflict

0:47:06.040 --> 0:47:08.759
<v Speaker 2>avoid it, and we're so worried about saying something that's

0:47:08.760 --> 0:47:11.120
<v Speaker 2>going to upset someone, So we just write in.

0:47:11.280 --> 0:47:13.319
<v Speaker 3>Questions to Ask and Cut. They keep doing it because

0:47:13.320 --> 0:47:15.360
<v Speaker 3>we need the more. Send it in your questions to

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:15.919
<v Speaker 3>Ask and Cut.

0:47:15.960 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 2>You can slide into the DMS and Instagram, which is

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Life on Cut podcast.

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 3>You can also follow us on TikTok, or.

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:24.359
<v Speaker 2>If you want to join the Beautiful Life on Cut

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:26.839
<v Speaker 2>discussion group on Facebook, go and do that also, because

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:28.600
<v Speaker 2>we would love before it, don't

0:47:28.600 --> 0:47:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Forget tea, mum tea, dad teo, dog tea, friends and

0:47:31.000 --> 0:47:33.360
<v Speaker 1>share the love because we love love