WEBVTT - Tammy Hembrow's Baby Fever

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to Outspoken. It's your dose of the

0:00:04.720 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>hottest influencer and pop culture news twice a week. I'm

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Sophie Torbah and coming up on today's show, So for

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Dophah labels Australian Fashion Week a shit show and Sammy

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Guggenheimer is called out for mistreating a Stan. But first,

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Tammy Hembro declared over the weekend that she has baby fever.

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>The mum of three went as far as asking her

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>followers if she should have another baby, before adding kidding

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>but not kidding Kate, a rather surprising revelation. Yeah, it

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't what I was expecting from Tammy, considering the marriage

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>breakdown rumors that are swirling. So Matt and Tammy still

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>appear to be living in separate states, and Tammy has

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>made it very clear that Matt isn't at home, so

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>she's constantly posting with her kids watching movies in bed together.

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>She also appeared Australian Fashion Week by herself. Matt's been

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>making it pretty obvious that he is back living in

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Melbourne too. He's been going on a lot of solo

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>movie trips. He also slept the MCG for charity and

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a couple of photos actually popped up of him chatting

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to some girls, which Tammy would not be happy about.

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>And he's also been posting a lot of happy snaps

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>with family. It almost gives the vibe that his family

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>are rowling behind him.

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 2>At this time.

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, he shared a photo dump of pictures of

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>him and his family standing next to this brick wall

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and wrote the caption brick by brick, So it seems

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>like he's rebuilding himself.

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 2>That's very deep from him.

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 1>And he also shared a photo of him walking in

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a forest with his mum from twenty twenty one and

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>then again in twenty twenty five.

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 2>It shows how close he is to his family in Melbourne.

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about these posts that Tammy uploaded

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday morning because they were very strange. So, she

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>had been watching the Twilight series with her kids and

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>she was saying how excited she was that they.

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Were getting into it.

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>And in one of the movies, I mean, I'm not

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a Twilight stand so I'm not across this franchise, but

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>there was a baby featured in it which looked like

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>an AI baby.

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 2>It's not actually a real baby, and she's creepy, wasn't that? Yeah.

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>She took a photo of the television screen with the

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>baby on it and wrote me baby feether with a

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>shaking hands emoji and said, guy, should I have another one?

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Low now?

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>That was quickly followed up with a picture of wolf

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 1>on the bed and said kidding but not kidding now.

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>This is all very strange because this comes off the

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>back of her husband, Matt, speaking very openly about his

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>struggles with fertility recently on the Inherited podcast. He doesn't

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>like to call himself infertile, but he has said that

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>there is a high likelihood that he will really struggle

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to have children yet because he can't naturally conceive because

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have any sperm. He did say that there

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>is a procedure that he can have that would increase

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the likelihood of him being able to have children. That's

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>why I was so surprised that Tammy would share something

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.119
<v Speaker 1>like this, because it did seem quite insensitive to Matt

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and what he's been going through. The timing of her

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>post was also quite curious because it was the same

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>day that her ex fiance, Matt Paul, announced the arrival

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of his son with his fiance Anna Lee. So they

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>called the baby Parker William Paul and he'll be the

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>brother of Tammy Hembro's daughter, Posey. So they really like

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the double pea names Posey Paul and Parker Paul. That's

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>quite a mouthful, and I'm going to be too critical

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of the names because I'll be putting my baby name

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>out there soon. But I am surprised that you'd go

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>with a double pe Well, Amy went with a double H.

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I think because p makes such a specific noise, like

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult to pronounce two peas two peas in the

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>pot two piece. The birth announcement was really beautiful because

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>they had a professional photographer. They're taking photos and one

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that stood out to me is that Matt just

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>looked so thrilled and happy in the vision. And then

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I was comparing it to his appearance in Tammy's birth flog,

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and it was so clear that they must have broken

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>up because his vibe was completely different.

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>It was really around the time of Posey's birth that

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>followers started picking up on the fact that something wasn't

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>quite right in their relationship. Matt Paul was beginning to

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>be quite absent from Tammy's content similar to what we're

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing now with Matt's kowski. It does seem like Tammy's

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>surrounded by babies at the moment, because prior to posting

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that she had baby fever, she had been hanging out

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>with her best friend Isabel Laws and her new baby daughter,

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and there'd been a couple of photos uploaded of Tammy

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>holding the baby, so this would be adding to it. Interestingly,

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>Isabel Laws also recently unfollowed Matt Zakowski on Instagram, which.

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Created a few headlines.

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Matt really is not helping this situation. So on his

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast this week with Anna macavoy, they spoke about the candle, firework,

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and mirror theory, which is this social media relationship theory

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>describing different types of relationships. When Anna was getting into

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>these relationship theories, I felt like she had to stifle

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a giggle a couple of times because it was so

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>clear that the firework theory, which we will throw to

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 1>in a second, is literally Tammy and Matt. Oh, it

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>was so awkward, Yet it was kind of like this

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>laugh that she knew the audience would know that.

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 2>This was about them.

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's kind of like that she knows she's not

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>allowed to say anything, but for the sake of their

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast and getting ratings up there, they'll start in fairing stuff.

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's throw it a little bit.

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Of that segment.

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 4>So first, let's start with the firework, the most crazy one,

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 4>as the name suggests, being a firework. So this love

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 4>is the intoxicating love, the one that burns bright but

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 4>fades quickly. So we've all had that relationship, I think,

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 4>especially when I was younger, I think the firework theory

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 4>happened a lot. Like you meet someone, it's explosions and

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 4>then next minute like it's over.

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 2>It all happens so quick.

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 5>Super and literally. Is that what they called the burn

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 5>bright eye on?

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So it's exciting, it's dramatic, it's explosive, basically like

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 4>an actual firework, it fizzles out quickly and often leaves

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 4>behind a smoky aftermath of drama and emotional wreckage. Matt,

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 4>can I relate, Yeah.

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 5>I think in a couple of firework relationships, definitely. I

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 5>feel like these ones, though everyone has to go through them.

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I say everyone, that's a bit of a

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 5>broad statement, but I feel like you learn from them,

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 5>and I feel like you better yourself from those relationships

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 5>and understand a bit more about yourself and a bit

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 5>more about dating. We've always said on this podcast dating

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 5>is about learning, and to learn you need to get

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 5>out there and explore different scenarios in different relationships. I

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.919
<v Speaker 5>think it's a very not useful, but it's something that

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 5>might seem tramatic at the time, but you learn from it.

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think the firework love rarely works out.

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>The vibe I got from that is that Matt is saying, oh,

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:39.840
<v Speaker 1>he's learned so much from this firework relationship with Tammy

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's grown as a person and he's matured.

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Now that it's over. Is that kind of what you

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 2>picked up on.

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't think it's definitely over. I think that

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>they're on a break to improve themselves. So I think

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Matt is trying to say, like that brick by brick

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>post that he did, that he's working on himself and

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>he's going to return to Tammy a better man. How

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>are you, I'm working on your relationship when you're not

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>even in the same state well and not even liking

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.359
<v Speaker 1>each other's Instagram photos. I know that sounds petty, but

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I've noticed that they haven't liked any for weeks now.

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>And the awkward thing is he's on this relationship podcast

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and he didn't mention his wife's name once, whereas Anna

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>macavoy kept referencing her husband throughout all it. Oh yeah,

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>they were talking about how it's fun as a couple

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to do painting classes, and earlier in the year, I

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>think it was around New Years, Matt and Tammy painted

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>each other and he referenced that, but he didn't use

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>her name at all or even reference who he did

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the painting class with. Yeah, Like, he didn't say my wife.

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>He just said, oh, yeah, I did this with a

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>partner once, I know, And despite not talking about Tammy,

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Matt referenced a friends with benefit situation which turned into

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a relationship. I'm sure Tammy would have been absolutely thrilled

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>with this. So it got brought up when Anna was

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>saying that most relationships start with some type of firework,

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and Matt said this.

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 5>As with one when I was like cooking up with

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 5>the girl for like a couple of years before I

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 5>realized that she was cool shit can started dating her

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 5>for over two years.

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 4>That's that must be a rare scenario. Yeah, so what

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 4>you guys were like friends with benefits. Yeah, and then

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 4>it moved into it just it just.

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 5>Got more and more, like you know, from every fortnight

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 5>to like once a week, twice a week it like

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 5>go home after going out with her or go like

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 5>and then eventually just got more and more like you know,

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 5>in the more you talk, and it was like dates

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 5>more dates, and it just gradually became a relationship. Didn't

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 5>work out obviously, Yeah, but you know you're young.

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, to be fair, he's obviously been told by Tammy

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that he's not to mention her at all and anything.

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 2>To do with this situation.

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>So if he does have this Dating and Relationships podcast,

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>he really can only refer to past relationships. Yeah, but

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>hearing that story made him sound like such a player

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and made it seem even stranger that he raced into

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>this relationship with Tammy. I didn't pick up on that

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>at all. I just thought he was talking about a

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>relationship he had when he was quite young. I actually

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>thought it might have been with that Genevieve that keeps

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>calling him out. I mean, I love that he says

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>it took him a couple of years of having sex

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>with this woman to realize that she was a cool chick,

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how awful is that?

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 6>Let's talk about Australian Fashion Week. This is my third

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 6>year attending Australian Fashion Week and I just wanted to

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.959
<v Speaker 6>do a little debrief on how this year has been.

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 6>So it's definitely been an experienced.

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>TikTok girl Sophia Beg is at the center of an

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Australian Fashion Week scandal. The twenty one year old influencer,

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>better known by her handle Sofa Dofa, labeled the event

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a shit show and called out media in attendance. Now,

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>before we get into the drama, so can you get

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>listeners up to speed with who Sofa Dofa is?

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 7>Well?

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>She is a big deal in the Australian fashion scene.

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>She's a GenZ style icon with her own fashion label

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that often sells out now. When she was seventeen, her

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>influencer career really took off off the back of her

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>wearing a blue corset from Glassons.

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:50.439
<v Speaker 2>On her TikTok.

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>That item immediately sold out everywhere and she attracted a

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>mass audience which now sits at almost.

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 2>Three million followers.

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>She also made a name for aus when she called

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>out fashion label White Fox Boutique and We spoke about

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Sofa on the podcast recently, as her name got dragged

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>into the Anna Paul saga. So Mikayla Tester alleged that

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Anna Paul made derogatory comments about her appearance.

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 2>In her Close Set Eyes apparently, and since then.

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people have had a soft spot for her,

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 1>which is why when she uploaded a TikTok talking about

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>her mistreatment at Australian Fashion Week, the people tuned in.

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>The video went viral and has over a million views now.

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>The video went for almost eight minutes and there are

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>several parts that I want to discuss. The first is

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>about the media in attendance. So Sofa called out the

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>journalists doing vox pops outside the event. She labeled their

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>questions as diabolical and inappropriate. Now, for those unfamiliar with

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the term vox pop, it's a short interview with a

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>member of the public, normally in a public place like

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>on the street or at an event, and the purpose

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is to gather a range of opinions or reactions. However,

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>in this new age of media, the motive of vox

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>pops has really changed, so they're now being used at

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.959
<v Speaker 1>events like these to try and create a viral moment

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that will gain a lot of engagement online. Things have

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>really changed since the TikTok Awards because there are a

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of influencers who were caught off guard on the

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>red carpet and fucked up and said stupid shit.

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 2>That went viral.

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 1>For instance, there was a general question which was being

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>thrown at influences around whether they thought the job of

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 1>an influence was hard, and most of them were smart

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>enough to play it off and say, oh, you know,

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we're very lucky to have this position, whereas one influencer

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>went into how difficult her role was and that the

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>public would just be unaware of the amount of work

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that she put into it, which was not a popular response.

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>There was also that clip of Anna Paul that went

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 1>viral where she was asked if she could be another

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>content creator for twenty four hours, who.

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 2>Would it be?

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>And she said someone that was super super rich that

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>traveled a lot. And everyone's like, but that's you, Like,

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>how unaware are you?

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>And you can see that this is a tactic that

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>they've been trying to implement an Australian Fashion Week, because

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you would expect that there'd be a lot of questions

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 1>about fashion and what the influencers are wearing. But instead

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>reporters have been asking invasive questions to try and catch

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>influencers out. Yeah, and it's always at the influencer's expense,

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't it now. Sofa was visibly taken aback when she

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>was asked on camera how much she earns and to

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>also divulge the biggest brand deal she's ever turned down.

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>They also wanted her to name and shame that brand.

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>This is what she said about it on a TikTok.

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 6>I feel like the interviewer's sole purpose this year especially

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 6>is just to catch people out with tricky questions that

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 6>they know they're going to get like juicy answers from. Like,

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 6>I feel like a lot of the questions they're trying

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 6>to get Tea, they're trying to get juicy answers, and

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.079
<v Speaker 6>a lot of the questions you can see are visibly

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 6>making the creators feel uncomfortable.

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 1>I just think that this tactic is very unfair, particularly

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>when you consider how young some of these influencers are

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and that they really haven't had any immedia training. That

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>would be a very.

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Difficult question to answer diplomatically.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it kind of shocks me when you realize that

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Sofa Dofa is only twenty one years old, and it's

0:12:57.440 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>not the first time that she's been rattled by an

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>interview you before. So She was trolled after her exchange

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>with Tony Armstrong at the twenty twenty three TikTok Awards,

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and during that interaction, Armstrong asked her how she was feeling,

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:11.959
<v Speaker 1>saying you look ecstatic and I'm pumped for you, and

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Sofa DPA replied, thank you, will stop flirting with me.

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>It was really awkward. We did talk about it on

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:20.599
<v Speaker 1>the podcast when it happened. Just Tony hit back and

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:22.839
<v Speaker 1>said that he had a girlfriend and everyone was like, oh,

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>good on him for turning her down. It was clear

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that in that moment she thought that he was giving

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>her some type of compliment, and she explained later on

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that other people had been complaining that interviewees weren't giving

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>them anything and she wanted to be fun.

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 2>It was just really a joke.

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that moment clearly lives rent free in Sofa's

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>mind because she spoke about how she was freaking out

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:44.959
<v Speaker 1>during the Australian Fashion Week interviews and so as You

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>touched on she's one of the influencers that hasn't had

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>media training, and she said that she was stressing having

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to answer these questions alone without her manager or her mum.

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I think because these viral videos disappear so quickly from

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>our fore pages that you forget how difficult it would

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>actually be for people to put up with the brutal

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>commentary that's going on in the comments section, because those

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>influencers get tagged all the time, and if you're someone

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that looks at your tags and reads the comments, I mean,

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it'd be very hard not to read what people were saying.

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I know, people go, oh, well, just don't look at it,

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, well, her job and other influencers a

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>job is to create content, and they have to use

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>those apps in order to put their content out there

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and get paid, so of course they're going to look

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>at their notification. And also, influencers get criticized if they

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>don't respond to followers requests about where they got their

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>outfere from, or if you look generally rude for not

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>replying to a really lovely comment.

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>During this TikTok video, Sofa said that she's often asked

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>how she's so confident.

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Let's take a listen to what she said.

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 6>Other creators or like just people in general. My dms

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 6>were asking me like, how are you so confident? I'm like,

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 6>I'm the least confident person ever, Like I have raging body,

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 6>the small fear and on antidepressants.

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I found that really difficult to listen to. And it

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>just shows what smoke and mirrors social media is because

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Sofa looks like such a confident person online.

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 2>It also shows how.

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Detrimental the Anna Paul comments would have been for her

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>mental health and also her confidence. Yeah, and unfortunately, it

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>seems like the media ended up getting what they wanted,

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>so a clip of an influencer calling out Sofa went viral.

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>In in our deleted video, a journalist ask content creators

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>attending the event to name a micro trend final boss.

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 2>What does that mean?

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I had no idea what this man. I had

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to do some digging. So it's a popular term on TikTok,

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's used in a derogatory way to describe someone

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>who chases fashion trends and doesn't have personal style. So

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>micro trends are really unpopular on TikTok at the moment.

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>So to name someone who embodies.

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 2>That is a very low blow. What do you mean

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 2>they're in popular?

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel like for years now, all we've been seeing

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a micro trends. Is it sort of out of fashion

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to follow those? Is the way you're saying, Yeah, it's

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>very unfashionable now to be seen to just be copying

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>micro trends. You're seeing as someone that actually isn't very

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>fashionable at all now. Most of the content creator's interview

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>looked uncomfortable and avoided answering the question. However, controversial influencer

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Jamie as a party named Sofa. They said, I love

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>watching Sofa dofa, but I felt like sometimes she doesn't

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>do fashion the way I do fashion. So, for those

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>not familiar with Jamie, they are a celebrity stylist who

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is non binary, so uses they then pronouns, and Jamie

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't a stranger to drama. Last year at the festival,

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>they made headlines when they made this grand entrance into

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a show, flanked by helpers holding their dress. Yeah, and

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the backlash towards Jamie was pretty swift. They were instantly

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>labeled a hypocrite online because they wore a sheene dress

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to the event. Which is a cardinal sin.

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 2>And when we're talking about micro trends, Sheen is one

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest contributors of these.

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it was a very strange move, particularly after they

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>wore Sheen. Now, on the topic of Sheen, I have

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to say the journalists ended up getting me because they're

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously trying to rage, bade everyone and create all this

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>engagement because they were asking influencers what would you change

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>about fashion in Australia, and a lot of influencers said

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>fast Fashion. And I was just scoffing because I'm like,

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>so many of you have promoted Fast Fashion, you're doing

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>collaborations with Fast Fashion. I understand that it's something that

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>we want to end, but if you're so passionate about it,

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>don't promote it. I am just shocked that anyone would

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>want to be seen wearing Sheen to Australian Fashion Week. Well,

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>I think Jamie likes being talked about, so it was

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>probably something that they thought would get a lot of attention,

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for the wrong reasons. Now, Sofa addressed the

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 1>controversy in her TikTok video, saying this.

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 6>I feel like the Australian influencer scene is already so

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 6>toxic and we have such big like tall poppy syndrome,

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 6>like we don't need other creators bringing people down. Also,

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 6>I got named as one of them by someone that

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 6>will shan to Australian Fashion Week.

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Well she has a good point, Yes she does now.

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Jamie responded in a lengthy statement on their Instagram story.

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>In it they backtracked and claimed they didn't understand the

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>question they were asked. They wanted to say that they

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>had been unfairly edited, but was ultimately disappointed by how

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>SOFA addressed it. They said, I think what you've said

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:12.679
<v Speaker 1>is questionable at best. It's a tough one because again

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Jamie has been set up by the journals. It's difficult

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in that situation when you put on the spot and

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you feel like you have to give a name. There

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>may have been a lot of pressure in going on

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>for them to give some sort of response, particularly after

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the other influences gave them nothing. Yeah,

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>but Jamie is known for creating controversies, so I think

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>it works to some influencer's favor because Jamie is the

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>type of influencer who likes controversy. They want to get

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>that attention so you know, the journalists and influencers can

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>work together. We've seen it with Anna Paul and Mikayla Tester.

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that is spurring a lot of this on

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>because I think a lot of mainstream media went wow,

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that went off. Let's pit other content creators against each

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>other and try and enjoy some of those cliques and views.

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>As a journalist, I can completely see why they're following

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.199
<v Speaker 1>this direction. It's very clever. It's a great way to

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>create engagement and also create brand news stories. Well, at

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, traditional media is dying and

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>media companies need to jump on these new forms of media.

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean everyone always complains about clickbait journalism. This is

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 1>just the new form of it. It's keeping up with TikTok.

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.959
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to get eyeballs and interurn dollars. Yeah, but

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 1>I think that this style of questioning actually adds a

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of excitement and extra interest around their red car.

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think it'd be boring if it was just like, oh,

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>what are.

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 2>You wearing today? And why?

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Why do the journals have to play it safe with them?

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>These people are earning a fluck ton of money. They

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>all have managers maybe they should have a bit of

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>media training in order to answer some of these questions. Yeah.

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>The thing that makes me feel a little bit uncomfortable though,

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is the media exploiting these content creators and sort of

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>engagement farming, getting all these comments on their videos and

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that obviously increases their views, But then they're not moderating

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>any of the comments because of course not going to

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:02.959
<v Speaker 1>because that, you know, decreases the engagement.

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's obviously a separate issue in itself.

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I definitely think that the media has to have more

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>responsibility over moderating comments sections and turning comment sections off.

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 2>But in saying that, I.

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Do feel like if you have a public profile, you

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>should be in a position where you can answer questions tactfully,

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>like that sort of just comes with the job. I mean,

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to see more and more influencers

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>getting media training and then these type of vox pops

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>will probably disappear because the journalists won't get what they want. Now,

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>if things couldn't get any worse for Australian Fashion Week,

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Sofa Dofa had one last thing to say, so she

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>labeled the event a shit show and said that the

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>lack of diversity on the runway was fucking insane. Here's

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>more of what she said.

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 6>Part of my French. But like, I went to a

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 6>show yesterday and the like diverse wasn't even in their vocabulary,

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 6>like they didn't even know what that word was, and

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 6>it was just so shit. Like I was just sitting

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 6>there like this is so shit, Like right, Australian Fashion Week,

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 6>where is the diversity? Where is the inclusivity? I just

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 6>thought in twenty twenty five we would have been a

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 6>lot better at that by now.

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Now not a glowing review by one of Australia's biggest influencers.

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I can just imagine the organizers seeing this all going down,

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>particularly because this year the event was up in the

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>air after sponsor IMG pulled out after running the event

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>for twenty years. So the Australian Fashion Council saved the event,

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>but they will not be liking this feedback. And I

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>think that this is a big reason why people love SOFA,

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 1>because she's not afraid to call injustices or things that

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't think are right out. I wonder if she'll

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>be on the invite list next year, Like.

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Someone will be asking, oh, like so, what's happening with this,

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 3>like when's this happening?

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 8>Or like what is this?

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 3>And that The influencers response is like, I don't understand

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 3>why the fuck you would even comment this.

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>The way influencers treat their fans in the spotlight after

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>podcaster Sammy Guggenheimer scolded a longtime listener for daring to

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>ask when her show was returning, The Influences, a lead

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 1>podcast just for girls, has been on a temporary hiatus

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>with no communication from either host about the state of

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the show's future. Yeah, and since late last year, there's

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>been rumors of a friendship breakdown between the hosts, Sammy

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Guggenheimer and also Easy Armitage and what that means for

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>their podcast going forward. So The Influencers launched their podcast

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>back in March twenty twenty three, and the show follows

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the similar structure that we've seen a lot of influencer

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>led podcasts follow. So basically, the women share updates about

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>their lives and they and their audience figure out their

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>early twenties together.

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 2>It's nothing new, Yeah, I feel like that is the blurb.

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>For so many influence podcasts now. Back in March, rumors

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of a rift between the hosts really ramped up when

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>both Sammy and Izzy removed the just for Girls link

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 1>from the Instagram bios, and there was this huge radio

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>silence about what was actually going on, which often causes

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>rumors to get out of hand and start taking a

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>life of their own. So one rumor that gained a

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of traction was that the girls had a falling

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>out over an ex. So many were convinced that Sammy

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>was upset at Easy for sleeping with her ex. So

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Sammy got even by sleeping with Izzy's X. Now, I

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>think we have to point out that those are unsubstantiated allegations.

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:17.880
<v Speaker 2>We have no idea whether that is true.

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>But that is just the rumor that is going around

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok, which it's a pretty terrible rumor. Yeah, and

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.199
<v Speaker 1>the girls ended up taking the piece out of that

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>rumor sharing this satirical video. So she fucked both my

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>ex boyfriends, and I went, oh, I'm gonna now fuck yours,

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and now we're going.

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh, let's just be friends again.

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 4>So that's the situation.

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So we hated each other, so glad you were

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 6>wife your mom now and like we you were beefing.

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>So the boy were all also fucked your first boyfriend

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that you dated when you were sixteen.

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you didn't tell you that more ideas?

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Sorry?

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 3>Oops?

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 2>Where Yeah?

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's one way to address a rumor. I

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>do enjoy it when people just do it with a

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>bit of humor.

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Now, despite attempting to put the rumors to bed, listeners

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 1>became suspicious again last month when the women stopped recording completely.

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So for the past four weeks they've just been uploading

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>reruns with no explanation of what's going on or what

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>their future plans are for the show. I hate when

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>podcasts do this. We actually had a thread in our

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.959
<v Speaker 1>Facebook community about this, how a lot of influencers will

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 1>start up a podcast and they don't realize how much

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>work it is to actually have a consistent podcast coming

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>out every week, and then they just go a wall

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and never return to it. I am still waiting for

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the Sam and Billy show to come back. That has

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 1>been gone for a year. They've never updated on their

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>social media accounts to say what's going on with it.

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 1>It's like so unprofessional. I think a lot of influencers

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>forget that if you start a podcast, you become part

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of people's weekly routines, and they build this parasocial relationship

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>with you because I think I think on podcasts people

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>speak in obviously conversation away, but they open up more

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>like you feel like you really know someone when you

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>listen to their podcast, and you feel like you're being

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>shut out by a friend when suddenly the podcast just

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>stops and there's no explanation as to what's going on. Yeah,

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.400
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely a strong parasocial relationship I think with podcasters

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and their listeners. And this is where podcast listener Nikita

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Kathleen comes into the story. So, Nikita has been a

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 1>long time fan of the Just for Girls podcast, revealing

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>she traveled for hours to attend the girl's live show

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.639
<v Speaker 1>and she's been to all of their events lined up

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 1>to meet them. And she's also a paid subscriber to

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the podcast and spent over seven hundred dollars on Sammy's

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 1>recent collection Drop.

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 2>So she is a.

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Stand of Sammy Gugenheimer. Yeah, she's very dedicated to the girls.

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>She's obviously invested a lot of time and money to

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>support them. Yeah. Now, back in April, Nikita created a

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>video asking whether YouTubers or podcasters owe their audience and

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>explanation or an update when they take an unexpected hiatus

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>or go mia. While the video was general in nature,

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Nikita did reference the Just for Girls podcast in passing,

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>which in hindsight, she says she shouldn't have done. Now,

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 1>the video started gaining traction and led to Sammy and

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Izzy weighing in in the comment section. It is unclear

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>what the girls commented, because Nikita has since deleted the

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:23.239
<v Speaker 1>video out of respect for them, but she said it

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.919
<v Speaker 1>was clear that they were frustrated by the video, and

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>she actually ended up messaging them privately and apologizing.

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 2>She said.

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Izzy didn't respond to her message, but sam ended up replying,

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:39.160
<v Speaker 1>saying that she felt personally attacked by Nikita's video, especially

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>because Nikita had been a longtime fan. Sam also said

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to her that the public doesn't know everything that's going

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>on behind the scenes, and it's not fair for them

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it now. Fast forward a couple of

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>weeks and Nakita, along with a number of other disappointed listeners,

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>started asking the girls in their TikTok comment section about

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>what was going on with the podcast, and Nikita explained

0:26:59.920 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that she was curious so she loves the show and

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>wrote is the podcast coming back or is it just

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:08.959
<v Speaker 1>going to be reruns. Sammy ended up replying directly to Nakita, writing,

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>we have spoken about this. I don't know why you

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 1>feel the need to speak publicly once you have messaged

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 1>me apologizing now. Nakita responded saying we only spoke on

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>my video that I deleted and not the podcast. I

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>was just asking because it's not in either of your

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>bios anymore and people miss it. I'm not attacking you,

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.120
<v Speaker 1>but asking a question. I'm just wondering. As a fan

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of the pod.

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Nikita was really worried that people.

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Would come for her in the comment section, seeing as

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 1>Sammy waded in and seemed to be annoyed at her,

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>But in reality, a lot of the listeners were disappointed

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>by Sammy's tone to her, and many noticed that Sammy

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>liked one of the few negative comments that was directed

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>at Nakita. So the negative comment said hopefully we can

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:52.360
<v Speaker 1>have an end to your trolling and speculation.

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 2>We can only hope now.

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Nakita ended up creating a five minute response video explaining

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>how she felt about Sammy's response. Let's ever listen to

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 1>some of what she said.

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 7>I just want to say. This was never supposed to

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 7>be hate. This was never supposed to be me attacking them.

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 7>I was really just curious as a fan as to

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 7>what's going on, and a lot of other people were

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 7>asking questions as well, And yeah, it kind of hurt.

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 7>Her response kind of hurt because it's like it was

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 7>only to me. She hasn't responded to anyone else. She

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 7>hasn't addressed to anyone else. Everyone that's been asking, she

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 7>hasn't said anything, and she could have just said like

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 7>update coming soon or something, but like, yeah, like and

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.679
<v Speaker 7>because I've met her, like, yeah, kind of hurt. So

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 7>I've since I'm followed. Unfortunately, it did hurt a little

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 7>bit as a fan. It was a bit disappointing because

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 7>I've put so much support and energy into them. I've

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 7>traveled hours and hours to see them, Like you know,

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 7>I've put in a lot of effort, I guess, and

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 7>to not get the same public respect, I guess you

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 7>could say back like I've always defended them and stuff.

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I felt really sorry for Nikita hearing this. It is

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>clear that she has invested a lot of time and

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>money into supporting these two women, and it feels like

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>they were more than aware of this. They know exactly

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 1>who she is, and I feel like Nikita's biggest crime

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>is literally being upset that her favorite podcast isn't returning.

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it'd be worse if Sammy and Izzy when

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>on this hiatus and literally none of the listeners cared

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>or noticed. But you've literally got someone who's devoted to

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you being like, oh my god, I missed this show

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>so much. Please let me know when it's coming back.

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know how difficult it would be to say, hey, Nikita,

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. It was so excited that you

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>love the show. We don't have any information right now,

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>but we will update you as soon as we know.

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>This really isn't an isolated incident. I mean, we've actually

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>got to thread in our Facebook community about people who

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>have been blocked by influencers, And often these people are

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>fans of the influencer and they're merely just suggesting something

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>in the comments, they're not trying to be rude, and

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>then they end up getting blocked. And a lot of

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the time when this happens, there's this parasocial relationship that's

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>going on, and you honestly feel so rejected. Like I've

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>had heaps of influencers blocked me because of this podcast,

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and I feel a bit hurt because I'm like, I

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>love watching your content and a lot of the time

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>people then turn into not trolls, but they go on

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>tatle life and they have a bit of a bitch

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>about the influence. Yeah, it's kind of because you feel

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>like the influence as a friend, and particularly if you've

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>been supporting them for a long time. A lot of

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>influencers forget about this parasocial relationship that people have with them,

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and they don't realize that these people have been following

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>them for such a long time, and because they really

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 1>love them and respect what they do. If there's something

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:35.719
<v Speaker 1>that they feel like they could be doing better, or

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>they have a question about when something's coming back, they'll

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>ask it. But they're not doing it with malice. They're

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>just wanting to know something.

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 2>It is hard.

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Because on the other side of it, we obviously have

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>this podcast and we have a lot of listeners message us,

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes you have to go, oh, hang on, they're

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>not having a go they're just sharing an opinion.

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 2>But it's difficult to reatone over messages as well.

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>You can sometimes feel like you are being attacked and

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you're like, hang on, I've tried really hard putting this

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>content out, so I can kind of see a little

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>bit where Sammy's coming from. I don't think she's executed

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it very well, because you need to go hang on.

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>This is someone who is paying for my podcast subscription,

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>is a fan of the show. They just want the

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>podcast back. I think a lot of podcasters and influencers

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>need to remember that this is a business at the

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>end of the day. And if you were in any

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>other sort of professional role and a client or a

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>customer came to you with something they were dissatisfied about

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>or just a general question, a lot of these times

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>they're just questions.

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 2>You could never respond so rudely to them. Yeah, exactly.

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, think about how many times you were working

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>in a retail job and you'd love to tell someone

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to go get fucked, but you don't.

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Like you just got to be professional. And that's the thing.

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Even though listeners, unless you've got a sub channel, don't

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>necessarily pay for your content, they are still supporting you

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>by downloading your episode. They're helping you grow, They're helping

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you go higher in the charts, which leads to sponsorships.

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think that you need to have a certain

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 1>level of respect for your listeners. Yeah, well, as you said,

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>podcasters and influencers are nothing without the audience they have,

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>so they need to treat them well. Now, Nikita's video

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>has been doing the rounds on gossip sites, and most

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>people are absolutely shocked by the way Sammy replied to her.

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>One user wrote her reply was so unnecessarily rude to

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a simple question. Another said that all just popular, mean girls.

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Who you'd be scared of in high school.

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>They don't care about the people that support them. They

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>care about popularity and looking better than everyone else. Now,

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>this isn't the first time that Sammy has been called

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>out for being condescending to her fans. Back in February,

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>she hit back at claims that she gate keeps her products.

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 2>From her followers.

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I remember we spoke about it, because she speaks

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>in this tone that is very condescending, and I think

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:49.719
<v Speaker 1>because she is such an attractive person that you do

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>get a bit of a mean girl vibe from it.

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Or in this video, she was rolling her eyes and

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>she pulled a lot of facial expressions where you got

0:32:57.280 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the vibe that as you say, Cay. She felt like

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>she was superior to those she was talking to, and

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>in the video she told her followers that they should

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>try being an influencer and that she doesn't read her

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>comments section to protect her peace, so that's why she

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't reply about where her products are from. She also

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>finished the video by essentially mocking her followers requests, saying, yeah,

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>this pimple here's from chocolate.

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 2>I bought it at Woolly's. And this video did not

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 2>go down as.

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>You can imagine, she ended up having to delete it

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 1>because there was so much backlash. Now, this incident with

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Sammy and the listener led to this reaction video from

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>TikToker Eva Dixon.

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Guys, I swear to fucking god, there's this niche of

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Australian influencers who literally act like their supporters are trying

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 3>to kick their dogs. If I see another fucking instance

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 3>where like someone will be asking, oh, like so what's

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 3>happening with this, like when's this happening, or like what

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 3>is this And the influencer's response is like, I don't

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 3>understand why the fuck you would even comment this.

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 8>Oh my fucking god, they're trying to support you I'm

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 8>so sorry. It shows like it really shows that you're entitled,

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 8>but it literally just comes off as so fucking entitled,

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 8>like oh my god, God forbid someone to fucking support you,

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 8>and you have to comment back and be like, oh,

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 8>like it's happening, then your life is so hard, good grace.

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's really spot on.

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:20.359
<v Speaker 1>There are influencers who give off this vibe that their

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>fans are just these annoying inconvenience that they have to

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>deal with and can't they just go and get free

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.839
<v Speaker 1>clothes and go to nice events without having to deal

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>with his crescence. It's like they're dirt on the sole

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of their shoe and they're like, fucking get away, don't

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>talk to me. And that video did resonate with a

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of people. It has almost generated half a million

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>views and thirty eight thousand likes.

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 2>What makes this story.

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Even weirder is that following this altercation with Nakita, Sammy

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and Izzy announced that Just for Girls is actually coming back,

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 1>so following the debacle, they shared a photo of themselves

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 1>at Coachella to their podcast page and wrote, We're back.

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:02.320
<v Speaker 1>After our amazing time at Coachella, we are back behind

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the mics next week recording year Epps can't wait for.

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 2>You to hear it.

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, but couldn't they just fucking said that to

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 1>begin with, instead of denigrading and insulting one of their

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 1>longtime fans. Yes, like, why wouldn't you write, oh, news

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 1>coming soon or something like that, And I'm like, how

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>fucking dare you ask me one more time? Tone was

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:23.760
<v Speaker 1>just so patronizing. I am interested to see if Nikita

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>will be tuning in maybe some hate listening now.

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, actually, she said that she has.

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Unfollowed both of the girls on Instagram, but if it

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:33.319
<v Speaker 1>were me, I probably would tune in just to hear

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>what has been going on and whether they would reference you.

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 2>She's definitely tuning in. Yeah, I think so.

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Well. I think that is all we have time for today.

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us for this episode.

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 2>If you have enjoyed it, could you please make sure.

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 1>You are subscribed on Apple podcast and also Spotify. This

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast was recorded on the traditional land of the Ghana

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>people of the Adelaide Planes. We pay respect to elders

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 1>past and present.

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 8>I say