WEBVTT - Pauline Hanson is being sued for hate speech

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Already and this this is the DAILYA.

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 2>This is the Daily OS.

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh, now it makes sense.

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Good morning and welcome to the Daily OS. It's Wednesday,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 3>the first of May.

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Zara, I'm sam.

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 3>This week, a hate speech trial against One Nation leader

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Pauline Hanson has begun in the Federal Court.

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 1>A defamation trial between Deputy Green's leader Marine Ferruki and

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has begun, with Australia's hate

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>speech laws expected to be put to the test.

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Well National leader Pauline Hanson has been accused of unleashing

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 2>a torrent of public racist abuse against Green senator Marine Ferruki,

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 2>including threats against her life. The case, brought by Green

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Senator Marine Ferruki, centers around an exchange on social media

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:54.279
<v Speaker 2>following the death of Queen Elizabeth.

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 3>It comes after Hansen was accused of racially discriminating against

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Green's deputy leader Marie Ferruki in a social media post

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 3>from twenty twenty two. Hanson and Faruki have both faced

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 3>questioning so far in the hearing, so on today's podcast,

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 3>we're going to explain a bit about the context of

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 3>the case and what could happen next before we get

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 3>there though, sam what's making headlines.

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Budget airline BONSA has entered voluntary administration. It comes after

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the Australian carrier announced the cancelation of all flights on

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday morning. Virgin and Quantas responded to the cancelations by

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>offering free flights to impacted passengers. Bonza became the first

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:41.119
<v Speaker 1>low cost independent airline to launch in Australia in fifteen years,

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>when its services began only in January of last year.

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>A notice filed to the Australian Securities and Investment Commission

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>or ASSEK on Tuesday shows Bonza has appointed an external

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>accounting firm to wind up its business operations.

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 3>A university in Melbourne has admitted to underpaying its casual

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 3>staff by two point eight five million dollars. Swimburn University

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 3>and its affiliate Swimburne College self reported the unintentional error

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 3>that impacted almost two thousand employees between twenty seventeen and

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three. It comes after the union representing university

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 3>staff raised concerns of underemployments in the sector in twenty

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 3>twenty two. The university has apologized and said it's working

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 3>on repaying affected staff.

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Solomon Island's Prime Minister, Manasse Sagovare has announced he won't

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>return as leader after recent elections. Polling in the South

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Pacific nation showed no clear winner. After last week's vote,

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Solomon Islands signed a security agreement with China in twenty

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty two that raised concerns from the Australian government about

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>increased tension in the Pacific region. Sagovari became Prime Minister

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen and it's not yet clear who will

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>take over as leader.

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 3>And today's good news, Australian researchers have made a breakthrough

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 3>towards developing a long term flu vaccine that would protect

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 3>recipients from multiple strains of the virus. The discovery from

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 3>the University of Melbourne brings scientists a step closer to

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 3>developing a replacement for the yearly flu JAB Flu vaccines

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 3>are usually updated yearly to keep up with mutations of

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 3>the virus. However, new research could see a universal vaccine

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 3>formulated so sam this week, a hate speech trial against

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 3>One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has begun in the Federal Court. Now.

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 3>It all centers around comments that Hansen made on social

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 3>media back in twenty twenty two, when she was accused

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 3>of racially discriminating against Green's deputy leader Marine Feruki. So

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 3>far we've seen both Hanson and Feruki face questioning this week.

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And what was the post that actually kicked all of

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>this off if we go right to the beginning of

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the case.

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 3>So in a social media post following the death of

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Queen Elizabeth this second, you'll remember that was in September

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 3>of twenty twenty two. You were on holidays. I was

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 3>slicsfully unaware.

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I was away what you werewa.

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 3>Was sleeping anyway at that time Marine Ferruki, who as

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 3>I said, is a Green senator. She wrote it was

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 3>then on Twitter now on x saying condolences to those

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 3>who mourn the queen. I cannot mourn the leader of

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 3>a racist empire built on stolen lives, land and wealth

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 3>of colonized peoples. She called for a treaty with First Nations,

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 3>justice and reparations for British colonies. In response, Pauline Hansen

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 3>told Feruiki to quote piss off back to Pakistan. And

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 3>it's that comment that Mariene Feruki is claiming was hate speech.

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>So Pauline Hanson fires off a tweets towards Marine Ferruki

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty two. What's happened from then to now?

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So, shortly after the tweets were posted, Marine Ferruki

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 3>moved to what's called censure Pauline Hanson in the Federal Senate.

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 3>And essentially what a center is is a formal statement

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 3>disapproval of a politician's actions or policies, doesn't have any

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 3>legal consequences and doesn't really hold much weight. We've seen

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 3>a number of politicians censured and never really translates outside

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 3>of Parliament House.

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of like being told off.

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so Fariki urged her fellow senators to condemn Hanson's

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 3>quote divisive, anti migrant and racist statement, which she had

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 3>said unleashed an avalanche of hate. Instead, Labor and Coalition

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 3>senators passed a general motion at the time condemning racism

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 3>and discrimination in all its.

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 1>Forms, so she didn't really get the response from the

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Parliament that she'd hoped for.

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 3>She didn't, and so from their Marine Ferruki moved to

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 3>lodge a complaint with the Australian Human Rights Commission. However,

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 3>when Pauline Hanson refused to participate in an investigation. There,

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 3>Marine Fruki ended up pursuing legal action instead, and that's

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 3>how we get to hear So Marine Feruki is arguing

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 3>in this legal action that Pauline Hansen engaged in unlawful

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 3>offensive behavior and that that is a breach of Australia's

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 3>racial discrimination laws. As part of this case, Ferruki has

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 3>also provided expert analysis of social media users responses to

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Pauline Hanson's post.

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so that's what Farruki is arguing in court. What

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>does Pauline Hanson say in response to all of this?

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Pauline Hanson is denying that the tweets were made based

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 3>on race. Her lawyers have made two main defenses. So

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 3>the first is that the post is protected by fair

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 3>comment on a matter of public interest, so arguing there

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 3>that Hanson therefore had a right to make a statement

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 3>defending the monarchy right. The second point that her lawyers

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 3>are arguing is that the post is protected by an

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 3>implied but not an expressly stated right of political communication,

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 3>meaning that both Pauline Hanson and Marine Ferruki have a

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 3>right to engage in political debate.

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Interesting, So Pauline Hanson. Ultimately, there isn't denying she

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>ever said it. I mean it's there in writing what

0:06:57.720 --> 0:06:58.039
<v Speaker 1>she's said.

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 3>I can't deny it. Yeah, millions of people.

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Right, So what she's saying is she was allowed to

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>say it because of those political and public interest defenses.

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>So both sides are bringing those arguments to court this week.

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>What have we heard in the court so far? So?

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Day one started with Marine Ferruki up as a witness,

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 3>and she was arguing, as expected, that Pauline Hanson's tweet

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 3>was racist. She said that she felt like she had

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 3>been silenced on colonization and made to feel like she

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 3>didn't belong here. She said that she started experiencing racism

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 3>in an overwhelming way once she entered into public life.

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 3>In response, Hanson's lawyer, Sue chrisent Thau argued, and I'll

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 3>quote it here, the racism that you've experienced is far,

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 3>far worse than the conduct that you complain about in

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 3>relation to my client. Christentthu went on to claim that

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 3>the barrage of abuse that Feriki said she had faced

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 3>was actually due to her own tweet, which was described

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 3>by the lawyer as provocative. Fariki rejected this premise, and

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 3>she said that Hanson was a well known, longstanding and

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 3>prolific sayer of racist things.

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So then Marine Feriki went off the stand in

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Pauline Hanson then took over. What did she have to say?

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So on day two, Pauline Hansen took to the

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 3>stand and over the course of the day she was

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 3>essentially just played a number of clips of comments that

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 3>she had made over a number of years, including in

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty seventeen when she said, and I quote here, Islam

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 3>was a disease that people need to vaccinate themselves from.

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:32.079
<v Speaker 3>So Faruki's lawyers were claiming that Hansen told her to

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 3>go back to where she came from because she is

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 3>a Muslim woman. Hanson rejected this premise and said that

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty two, when she published the tweet about

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.679
<v Speaker 3>Marine Ferruki, she didn't know that she was Muslim. So

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 3>is that kind of questioning and back and forth that occurred.

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 3>On the second day of the hearing, Hanson spoke of

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 3>feeling incensed and insulted by Ferruki's tweet.

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>So this is ongoing. We'll keep everybody updated as this

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>case progresses. But Fariki brought this case against Hanson in

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, what is she actually looking for here?

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 3>If she wins, she's asking for an apology from Pauline

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.239
<v Speaker 3>Hanson and one hundred and fifty thousand dollars in compensation

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 3>to be paid towards a charity. Whether or not she

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 3>gets that, we will have to wait and see.

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for taking us through that, Zara. We'll bring everybody

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the result, perhaps in a news story when that gets

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>passed down by the court, and who knows how long.

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Just a quick bit of news from the Daily Ods.

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>We have announced that on Monday next week we are

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>launching our first sports newsletter. It's going to be hitting

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>your inbox at five pm every weekday. It would mean

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the world if you signed up. I'll throw a link

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in today's bio. We'll be back again tomorrow. Until then,

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>have a great date. My name is Lily Maddon and

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm a proud Arunda Bunjelung Cargottin woman from Gadigol Country.

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>The Daily oz acknowledges that this podcast is recorded on

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the lands of the Gadighl people and pays respect to

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.719
<v Speaker 1>all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island and nations. We pay

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>our respecs to the first peoples of these countries, both

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>past and present.