WEBVTT - The Viral Henne Cardigan

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to Outspoken. It's your dose of the

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>hottest influencer and pop culture news twice a week. I'm

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Amy Torber and coming up on today's show, the blow

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:18.799
<v Speaker 1>up over the viral Henny Cardigan, Sky Wheatley's partner's business

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>goes into external administration, and m Davies touching baby news.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:27.159
<v Speaker 1>But first, Sophie, you're still reeling from Molly May and

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Tommy Fury's breakup news. As the official Outspoken correspondent, can

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you tell us the latest yet? Well, we haven't heard

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>any confirmation yet from Molly May. She has remained silent

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>on this topic, but that hasn't stopped the rumor meal

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 1>from going into absolute overdrive. We are swimming in a

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of rumors on the internet at the moment. The

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>one gaining the most traction is the rumor that Tommy

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>cheated on Molly during an alcohol field lad's holiday to

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>North Macedonia with a Danish girl. Well, this was actually

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>printed in the Sun. Yeah. According to the Sun, Tommy

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>was seen kissing a blonde woman in a nightclub during

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>what they described as a two am vodka binge. Now,

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>this was reportedly just days before Molly May announced their

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>split on Instagram. A source who claims to have witnessed

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the kiss told the son he was down in gray

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Goose vodka and didn't seem to care who saw him

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>with the girl he kissed her. This will be heartbreaking

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>for Molly May. There was also a quote that interested

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>me from Molly's so called friend, and the friend, of

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>course isn't named in this article, but I would not

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 1>be surprised if her manager, Fran was briefing the press.

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.479
<v Speaker 1>So the friend was quoted in the newspapers saying Molly

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>was told he had cheated on her with a Danish

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>woman he'd met while he was away in Macedonia. She

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to believe it was true. When she confronted

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>him and asked him if he had cheated on her,

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Tommy didn't deny it. It told Molly May all she

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>needed to know, and she ended it. He's moved out

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of the house and she's absolutely reeling from it all.

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Tommy's management team have also been working hard in the

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>background trying to shoot down some of them rumors. They

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>released a statement saying that he has been left horrified

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>by the false rumors and he's also consulting currently with

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>his lawyers because of these rumors that are being circulated

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>by the meeting. It's pretty bold of his team to

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 1>come out and label these allegations as false, because surely

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>there is a woman waiting in the wings, just getting

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>ready to tell her story. Yeah, but when they're talking

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 1>about false rumors, I think what they're referring to other

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>rumors that we touched on on Friday's episode, and that

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>was in relation to a TikTok rumor that Tommy had

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>impregnated a boxing coach's daughter. Oh yeah, Now that gained

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of momentum online and people were harassing the woman,

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>leaving comments saying, tell us that this isn't Tommy Fury's child,

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and her dad had to come out and say, I

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>couldn't believe what we woke up to. She has a

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>lovely partner. Here's a photo of them together. So I

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>think that his team is saying, look, this rumor is

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>not true. It's been proven to be und true. So

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be really careful about what you're going

0:02:57.840 --> 0:02:59.519
<v Speaker 1>to post in the future. Yeah, you need to get

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>your source is not from TikTok. Makes right, I met

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that could be a good start.

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 1>The paparazzi have been camped outside Molly's house for days now,

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>which would just be so incredibly tough when you're going

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>through a breakup. That being said, I was very interested

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to see who were her support people in that moment

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>because we do know that her sister is currently away

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>on her honeymoon. And it was so cute because her

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>dad rocked up with a bunch of flowers and he

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>has also unfollowed Tommy on Instagram, which sends a strong

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>message from her manager was also there as well as

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a handful of her other friends and everyone has been

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>waiting to catch the first glimpse of Molly since the breakup,

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>where everyone wants to see if she's doing okay. Yeah,

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't disappoint because the paparazzi snapped Molly and

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>her friends in the car at the McDonald's drive through.

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Can she be any more relatable? That's the first thing

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that anyone does when they're going through a breakup. They've

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>got to get in the car with their friends, put

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>on breakup music and get McDonald's like it is the

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>best therapy. I would have loved to know what was

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>on their playlist and what they were discussing. You want

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to know what they ordered? What about the person who's

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>serving Molly bay though? How awkward? Like tell me everything now.

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>The paparazzi also snapped photos of Tommy returning home Briefly.

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>He was only there for forty minutes on Friday, but

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it's believed it's the first time Tommy and Molly have

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>seen each other since they're split, and everyone is talking

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 1>about what is going to happen to their beautiful six

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>bedroom mansion. So interestingly, there are reports that, according to

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the land registry papers, this house, which was bought for

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>three point eight pounds in twenty twenty two, was solely

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>purchased in Molly's name, So this means that Tommy is

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>unlikely to have any financial stake in this property. I

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 1>am so happy to hear that because you can just

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>tell what a safe haven that home is for Molly.

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>It has her written all over, it is her interior design,

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>so I'm glad it looks like she'll get to keep

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that in the split. I'm wondering how that works, because

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're a de facto's in Australia, regardless of if

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>your name is on the paperwork, you still have some

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>claim to the property. I don't know if the rules

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>are different in the UK, but I'm hoping that Molly's

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>able to keep the house. Now for those who are

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>hoping that maybe Tommy and Molly might be able to

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>work through their issues, is looking more and more unlikely

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>because a large skip has been seen outside the mansion

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>with a suitcase poking out the top of it, and

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:24.359
<v Speaker 1>many think that this skip is slowly going to be

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>filled with Tommy's belongings and that suitcase is his. If

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a picture doesn't paint a thousand words, I think that

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>she wants the paparazzi to see him having to fish

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that suitcase out of the skip, because that would be

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>absolutely iconic. It just sends the strong message that he

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>has done something and we're all waiting to unpack what

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that is. He needs to be put in the bin,

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't he Yes, I.

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 2>Don't give a shit what fucking cardigan you wear?

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Author Kate Forster says she's been inundated with prank calls

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 1>and online abuse since creating a TikTok video calling out

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>the viral Henny Cardigan. The fifty three year old questioned,

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>young people all want to look the same by wearing

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the cult cardigan created by fashion influencer Nardier Bartel. So

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>this cardigan has been all over my for you page.

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>It is everywhere. Every time I go on TikTok, I'm

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing a fashion influencer either reviewing this cardigan or showing

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>how to style it. Now, the cardigan is called Selene,

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and what makes it stand out is the fact that

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>it's fluffy. So it's made from our packer blend and

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it comes in a range of different colors. It currently

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>retails for two hundred and twenty nine dollars, which is

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>quite expensive for a cardigan. I mean it is pricey.

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't own the viral Henny cardigan, and I want

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 1>to put it out there. Please no one come after me.

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>But I know that this is one item of clothing

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that my husband would pay me out for wearing. So

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it's more of like girls get this kind of fashion. Yeah, definitely,

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 1>this is something that I don't think guys would get.

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.679
<v Speaker 1>And for the purpose of this podcast, I ask my husband,

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>what is your take on this cardigan? And he said

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that he thinks I would look like a little kiwi

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>fruit wearing it, which isn't actually that bad, Like, that's

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of cute, a little kiwi fruit with fur on it.

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I actually think it's quite a cute way to describe it.

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>But I pushed him even further and he said that

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.119
<v Speaker 1>it kind of looked like the designer got a glue

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>stick rubbed it all over the cardigan and then someone

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>rolled around in hair. Are you trying to get Brandon canceled?

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Because people are very passionate about this cardigan. Well, after

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>he gave me his honest review, I told him that

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>women are coming after anyone who speaks badly about this cardigan,

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and he looked genuinely horrified, and he pleaded with me

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>not to mention his comments. So it looks like a

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>really cozy cargan. Yeah, it has been touted as this

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>perfect winter staple because it looks very warm, especially if

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you're living in Melbourne where it's extra cold. Now. This

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>cardigan is currently so hard to get your hands on

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>because it is so hyped up on TikTok.

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 3>I have been trying to get my hands on the

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 3>items in this package for quite literally months, so I'm

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 3>very excited to open them. We've all seen it, the

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 3>viral handy cardigans I got it in two colors, so let's.

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Try them up.

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I have noticed that TikTokers are always leaving their LTK

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>codes that their followers can go and shop their Henny

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>look and on the Henny website. This cardigan is currently

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>out of stock, but there's a little countdown to when

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it will be back, so I think it's almost a

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>way to build hype, like, oh my god, I've got

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to get my hands on this cardigan. Yeah, but despite

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>it being out of stock, the Henny marketing team is

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>continuing to drip feed gifted cardigans to micro influencers purely

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>so they'll post about it, creating more hype around this item.

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah. I recently saw one TikToker who has four

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand followers, saying that Henny had just dropped her the

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>out of stock cardigan, which then motivated her to create

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a try on video about it. Here's what she said,

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I must be in Henny's good books today.

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 4>Unannounced, the postman arrived with the delivery and inside was

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 4>the sold out Selene CARDI it's basically impossible to get

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 4>your hands on. Somehow, I got said one. I am

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 4>so obsessed.

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a really clever tactic because if

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Henny were to gift this out of stock cardigan to

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.079
<v Speaker 1>large influencers, I think that that would create a lot

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of animosity and jealousy. But because they're gifting it to

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>micro influencers who feel like our friends, it's subtly reminding us,

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>don't forget about this cardigan. It's coming out soon. And

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>also at the same time, we're hearing a micro influencer

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>who was so appreciative to get it. Yeah, and this

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>brand is one of those cool girl brands. It's very chic,

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>it's very Melbourne. It was founded by influencer Nadia Bartel

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen with her sister, and it has quickly

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>become a cult favorite.

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Now this is where author Kate Forster enters the chat.

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>So she is a best selling author who recently joined

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and in the space of a few weeks, she's

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>gained over twenty four thousand followers, and that's by sharing

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>advice and fashion reviews. And I have to put it

0:09:57.960 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>out there. I am a big fan of her content.

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>She is refreshingly honest and absolutely hilarious. Her content is

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>very satirical and she just says it how it is.

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>She's been popping up a lot for me, and I

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>find her content it's like, it's nothing serious, it's just funny. Yeah.

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I first came across her content when she created a

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of tiktoks about the Witchery rebrand. Here's a snippet

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of what she said, Why why.

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Do you give a fuck about a mid brand like

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 2>bloody Witchery? But Witchery is just not it. It was never it.

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 2>It was always low rent Mimco and I hate Mimco.

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 2>So stop worrying about it. Go and invest in better fashion,

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 2>better quality, better style, support young creators. I don't know,

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 2>just fucking get over Witchery.

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>As you can hear from this clip, she is hilarious,

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>but she's also very passionate about women supporting other brands,

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and not just the mainstream brands. Since that video, she's

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>reviewed Zimmerman, Country Road, Sports Girl, Cookie, Suzanne's Spell, and

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>also White Fox. White Fox was one of my favorites. Yeah,

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>go and check it out, like, oh my god, so

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>spot on. But it wasn't until she shared her thoughts

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>on Henny that her account really took off. Here's what

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>she said.

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:21.839
<v Speaker 2>So hear me out right I say all those girls

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 2>I saw an influencer yesterday to say that all the

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 2>women of Australia except for the fat ones, are wearing

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 2>the Henny Cardi. So I don't understand why girls who

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 2>say their influencers are then all wearing the same uniform.

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 2>It's this Henny Cardi that you know. I'm in my

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 2>late twenties early thirties version of a white Fox sweater.

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm just questioning because I do see it a lot,

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 2>and I'm just wondering, if you're going to be an

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 2>influencer and a fashionista, why are you not looking at

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 2>other brands for cardigans? For example? Like, it's a fucking cardigan.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:01.719
<v Speaker 2>How do you want to wear the same thing as

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 2>everyone else? Now?

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:07.079
<v Speaker 1>She is bang on describing the Henny cardigan as the

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>late twenties to thirties version of the white Fox jumper,

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>because it is exactly what it is. She has hit

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the nail on the head now. Kate then proceeded to

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.839
<v Speaker 1>show her followers a range of cardigans that other small

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>brands sold and questioned why you'd want to look like

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the same person walking down the street. She then finished

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>by saying this, Can.

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 2>I stop saying the same fashion influences, wearing the same friggin' things.

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 2>It's not a uniform. Start showing me what's good, not

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 2>what everyone else is wearing.

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>In a now deleted video, she also compared Henny wearers

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to bogans. Now that frustrated and upset a lot of people,

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 1>shots fired. They again, I had the feeling it was satirical.

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I think she really hit the nail on the head

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>about this concept of people wearing a uniform. Ever since TikTok,

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>there's been this real desire to replicate trends and follow

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>whatever the cool girl is currently wearing on there. It's

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.199
<v Speaker 1>not a platform that encourages people to be different and

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.719
<v Speaker 1>stand out, because you get rewarded if you copy other

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>people's fashion trends. It's all about making sure also that

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you fit this cool girl aesthetic that's being dictated to us.

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>And I think that with the cost of living crisis,

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>we're also being told to look at capsule wardrobes and

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>buy items that we can mix and match with others,

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and people are moving away from statement items. I'm always

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>hearing stylist talk on TikTok about this is how you

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>can create a uniform for work or a uniform for

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. Even no one has their own style, as

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you said, anymore, no one wants to stand out from

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the crowd. There's been so many times I've gone to

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a cafe and it's the white fox hoodies, like as

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Kate said, everyone wears. And I think, how embarrassing would

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that be if teenage? Yeah, all tenagers. It's kind of

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>like when we were at high school and you'd have

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:00.599
<v Speaker 1>casual day. But back when we were high Scott was

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>the billabong jacket and you'd be so embarrassed because you'd

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>rock up and two other people would be wearing the

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>same bang. It would be awful. As an adult, it's

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>really awkward wearing the same thing as someone as well.

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I went to a wedding recently where I wore this

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>bright blue dress. It was my sister in law's wedding

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and one of her friends wore the exact same dress,

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>but we just had to own it. We ended up

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>getting photos together and it was something we could bond over.

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>But I do see the irony of going out to brunch.

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>For some reason, I always envision in Melbourne and there's

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>just a swarm of thirty something women in this fluffy

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>jumper than Dewey is walking around little Kiwi fruits. Thank

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>god there are different colors though, that might at least

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>make you stand out a little bit.

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Kate's video went absolutely viral, with a large portion of

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>women actually agreeing wholeheardly with what she said, but it

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>was also met with a lot of criticism. So one

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>user told Kate that she is giving pick me vibes

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and finished by saying that the Cardi slap so you

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>can tell that it's a there these girls sounds so triggered,

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I know. Another person said, have you actually tried it on?

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>It's popular for a reason. Now, her video definitely seem

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to ruffle the feathers of fashion influencers who began sharing

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>their thoughts on her video, But the catch was that

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they were doing what she described was a dog whistle.

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>So what a dog whistle is is that you don't

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>actually name the person that you're speaking about, but you

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>act as if it's just a general thought about some

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>like a trend that's happening, even though it's clearly one

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>person that you're directing it out. Hate this this happens

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>all the time. We've had this where people will literally like,

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>they'll be talking about something our podcast has spoken about,

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>but they won't reference the podcast because they know that

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>people will go over to it and agree, Yeah, why

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>no context is what they're saying either because they're like, oh,

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it doesn't really matter. It was you know,

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it was some gossip thing. And then and it's like, no,

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>just name it. Own it. You gotta call something out,

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>name it. The funniest thing is I think that we

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>were actually just dog whistling ourselves then. But I think

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>people will be able to read into it. Will we

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>name and name and shame all the time. We may

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>go into that in a subs episode because we're getting

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>off track now. A fashion influencer called ari Yasman, who

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>has over twenty thousand followers on TikTok, created a video

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>not naming Kate, but saying she doesn't like the current

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>trend of people critiquing viral outfits in a passive aggressive way.

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 6>Here's what she said, quick one, When did we start

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 6>being mean to people about liking and wearing popular items

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 6>of clothing. There's a genre of video I really like

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 6>on here, which is kind of talking about trends, maybe

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 6>critiquing trends, maybe critiquing brands when they're not doing good enough,

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 6>like the Witchery rebrand. Then there's another trend that I

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 6>don't think I like so much, and that's kind of

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 6>critiquing individual creators or people for wearing what we don't

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 6>think are interesting enough outfits, or wearing something that's really

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 6>viral or really popular. Some of the stuff I've seen

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 6>recently kind of just seems to be being passive aggressive

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 6>to people who like wearing things that are popular in

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 6>Australia right now. But I feel like, are we not

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 6>just making women feel bad about themselves for something that's

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 6>not problematic and not hurting anyone.

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>She finished by asking everyone else's thoughts on the matter

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and says she's forming her opinion on it as she speaks. However,

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Kate Forster actually accused her of removing any comments that

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't agree with her opinion. So it's interesting to ask

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.439
<v Speaker 1>for comments but then not like it when someone shares

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a different opinion. Now, there was a very mixed response,

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>as I said in the comment section, and one of

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:44.199
<v Speaker 1>the notable responses was from Victoria Devine, who runs the

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>She's on the Money podcast, and she agreed with Ari's sentiment, writing,

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not even being passive aggressive, She's being a bully.

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe in twenty twenty four so many people

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>are supportive of her content. Now, a follower reply to

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 1>Victoria saying, I'm genuinely surprised to see you making this comment.

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I followed you for a while now which part is bulling?

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>And I shared the same sentiment as this commenter now,

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Victoria responded, if you don't see the content I'm referring

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to as blatant bulling, perhaps you shouldn't follow me. She continued,

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>saying her body shaming and name calling should be glaringly

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 1>obvious signs of bullying. No, I'm really surprised that Victoria

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>would weigh into this and have this opinion. I mean,

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>she is a friend of the podcast, we have heard

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>her on the show before. Though maybe she owns a

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Henny Cardigan and just saw red like I don't know.

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the word bulling by the general public, though,

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>has been weaponized in twenty twenty four. I think that

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 1>people are so quick to label any sort of critical

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking as bulling, and just because someone might critique something

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>or challenge your way of thinking, I don't think that

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>we can categorize that as bulling. I have never seen

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Kate body shame anyone. I've consumed a lot of her content,

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and if anything, she is the one who has been

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>copying a lot of derogatory remarks about her appearance. There's

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of young women seeming to take issue

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>with the way that she looks, calling her fat, saying

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>she looks like Hagrid, and she's had a laugh about that,

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>but I can tell that it has actually affected her.

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 1>It's just so nasty. The whole thing to me seems

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>quite ageist. It's like, how dare you a woman who's

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>in her fifties have an opinion on fashion? Yeah, that's

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>ultimately what I think it comes down to. You know,

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>in this day and age where everyone's so woke, maybe

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>this content might be surprising to some because it's quite

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>refreshing to see someone actually being satirical. She drops the

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 1>odd F bomb, she pokes fun. It's very lighthearted. But

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>do any of these Jen Edison have like a sense

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.959
<v Speaker 1>of humans? Yet? How can people not tell this is

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 1>a jog and it's not even as you said, it's not.

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 1>She hasn't body shamed anyone. It's simply a joke about fashion,

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's also the fact that she is actually very

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>passionate about fashion, and she's just calling out the fact

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that there's no individuality and she wants people to support

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>smaller brands because a lot of smaller fashion brands are

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>going under now. Kate hit back to the critique, saying this.

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Say, a lot of these fucking young women on here

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 2>who are afraid to actually say what they think. Do

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 2>you know what, that's the number one thing that will

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 2>get you through life is fucking sticking to your ideals

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 2>and your values and having a fucking inner moral compass. Right.

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't give a shit what fucking cardigan you wear.

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 2>I actually really don't care. It's all a fucking meme.

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 2>This app it's all a meme simply asking people to

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 2>look at other brands because the Australian industry, fashion industry

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 2>is in the fucking toilet. So if you're all wearing Hanny,

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 2>what about the other nitweb providers.

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Kate also raised a really interesting point about kickbacks which

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>influencers receive for pushing certain brands. So a common theme

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>through the viral Henny Cardigan videos is influencers offering up

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>their LTK links to shop the law. Yeah, and if

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you haven't seen LTK before, it is basically an app

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>where you can shop your favorite influencers content. So they

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 1>don't just put clothes up there. You can also shop

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>their furniture and their house, or their paintings or their homeware.

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>It's very clever marketing. It's basically an affiliate link, so

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 1>everything is for sale, that's right. So what happens with

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the Henny cardigan is an influencer will share their LTK

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>link and it will then direct you to the Henny website.

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>But what a lot of people don't know is that

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the influencer actually receives a commission for each purchase you make.

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>It can be very lucrative for fashion influencers because they

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>can make anywhere between ten to thirty percent off that

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>affiliate link. So when it comes to an item like

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 1>at the Henny cardigan, which is two hundred and twenty

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>nine dollars, they are making twenty two dollars ninety of

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>every cardigan you purchase from their link, So clearly they

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>have an incentive to be pushing that cardigan, to be

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>creating content around that Cardigan and Hennier also very clever

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to be on LTK because they get access to over

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.239
<v Speaker 1>two hundred thousand influencers who were signed up to it,

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and when you search Henny on LTK, you can see

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>just how many people are collaborating with them, just how

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 1>many people are building hype over this cardigan. Now, this

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:19.439
<v Speaker 1>discovery led Kate to question are the kickbacks the reason

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 1>so many influencers are pushing this cardigan? Here's what she

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>had to say.

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 5>So is the Henny Cardigan viral because it's a great cardigan,

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 5>because I've heard mixed reviews and I don't give a shit.

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 5>I'm never gonna wear it. Is it viral because everyone

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 5>loves it? Or is it viral because all the influencers

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 5>are getting a percentage of when they sell it, so

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 5>you have to be transparent as an influencer.

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Kate also questioned the transparency, saying if influencers have to

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>declare paid partnerships, why don't they have to say they're

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>getting a cut each time they push a cardigan? Which

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>is such a good point. It is such a valid

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>point because if I'm shopping in influencers, look, I want

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to know what they're making from it, because are they

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>telling me that this pair of jeans is great because

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 1>they genuinely like it, or is it because they're making

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a huge commission of it now. Things really escalated when

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Kate started receiving prank calls to her house, so she

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 1>posted a TikTok at one am on a Saturday night

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>saying she hadn't slept because of repeated calls from people

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>abusing her for calling out influences over a cardigan. Here's

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>what she said.

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 2>I have received repeated phone calls to my house to

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 2>my mobile phone, which I don't know where they got

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 2>my fucking number. I probably didn't hide it very well.

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 2>They have called me many times and made fun of

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 2>me over the phone about this. So if you think

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 2>you're standing for Henny, you're actually putting a massive skid

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 2>mark on it, because now on and my I don't know,

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 2>NOI sixteen thousand followers probably are going to look at

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 2>this brand and gone say, well, you kind of aren't

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 2>pretending to be something that you're not more power than

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:20.400
<v Speaker 2>you think by threatening me over the phone, by invading

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:26.479
<v Speaker 2>my personal space because I asked an influencer who always

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 2>talks about fashion to try other brands and then ask

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:35.719
<v Speaker 2>general Australian influencers to try other brands because Australian fashion

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 2>is in a crisis. You have actually done this brand

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 2>a disservice because you have made the brand look like

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 2>main girls. I don't know if they are or aren't.

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Kate finished by saying she was worried for her safety.

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 1>This is shocking that things have escalated this much over

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a cardigan. It would be really terrifying for her as well.

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean she's got ten age kids, she's hopped on

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.719
<v Speaker 1>TikTok really for the first time. I mean, she's no

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>stranger to the industry. She's had radio shows before, she's

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a very successful author. But it would be a very

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>strange feeling to be targeted in this way over something

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that you see as lighthearted. For TikTokers are just next level,

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>aren't they. Yeah? I mean I think strolling and the

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>commentary's disgusting. Absolute cesspool of people. Now I want to

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>point out what an absolute class act Nadia Bartel is

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>because following this revelation, she DMed Kate to apologize. She wrote, Hi, Kate,

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I am reaching out to you because of a few

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>of your tiktoks I've seen. I'm so sorry you have

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>been receiving threatening calls to your home. Neither Henny nor

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 1>I support bulling of any form. So Kate shared this

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>DM to her TikTok, saying she told Nadia the tea

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:56.199
<v Speaker 1>and they both agreed. Some people in privileged positions should

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>know better what an absolute burn she is sharing this

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to her TikTok to say that your queen, Nadia Bartell

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>is siding with me. It's just a big fuck you. Basically,

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I just think that this is a really fantastic pr

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>move by Nadia. She could have blocked Kate or got

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:15.399
<v Speaker 1>angry that she was commenting about her brand, but she

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>rose above her and befriended her. And I think we've

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>seen so many influences in the past take any sort

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of criticism or feedback badly. They blow up and they

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 1>don't even take the chance to actually look at what

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>people have said about them. Yeah, here's some free PR

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 1>advice for influencers. If you get called out, don't go

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>on the attack. Go in there with kindness. Because of anything,

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Kate has actually pumped up this cardigan even more. She

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>has shown how devoted these Henny fans are. I want

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it now exactly. I might have looked at Henny I

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh, I don't think the Kiwi cardigan is

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>for me. But she's got some k Selene, Selene, She's

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:57.199
<v Speaker 1>got some really amazing bomber jackets and jeans. Nadia just

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:00.959
<v Speaker 1>looks cool in anything. I stand that so hard. Did

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you bring out like a penny plastic bag for freakin

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>two hundred bucks and people would buy it? Or maybe

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>not plastic, maybe paper.

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 2>You guys are gonna be her best friend.

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Perth influencer m Davies has announced the birth of her

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:21.120
<v Speaker 1>first child, and surprisingly, this is an influencer baby name.

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:23.919
<v Speaker 1>I think that outspoken can get behind. Yeah, I really

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>like it. So Em and her partner Joel Gamban have

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:31.199
<v Speaker 1>named their daughter Eila Sue Gambon, and perhaps this is

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a sign of the times that we're going to see

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>more influencers going for traditional names. Well, Eiler was actually

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 1>crowned as the most popular girl's name in Queensland in

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three, and as you said, Amy, it is

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>quite unusual to see influencers go for a name that's

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>very mainstream.

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, Em previously told her followers not to expect a

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>weird baby name from her because she said she much

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.400
<v Speaker 1>prefers the traditional names, and she even gave her followers

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.360
<v Speaker 1>an insight into the style of baby names she liked

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>before give birth. So for the girls that included Delilah, Maye, Sadie, Stevie, Rommy,

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and Alaura, I'd say there are a few unusual names

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the way. Well, I think that they're pretty normal by

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 1>today's stand Yeah, it's not like kombucherous because my algorithm

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 1>is constantly feeding me kids' names and these ones are

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>very popular at the moment. And for boys' names, she

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>also liked Blue, Carter, and Kai. And it was really

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>beautiful because Em selected her baby's middle name as Sue,

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's named after her mum, who sadly passed away.

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Some followers were quite intrigued because em had said that

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>no matter what, she wanted, to call the baby's middle

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>name Sue. So people were thinking, well, if you were

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>going to call your boy blue, would it have been blue?

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Sue sounds like blues clues. Surely she wouldn't have given

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the name Sue for a boys, I know now. Her

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>mom did sadly pass away a couple of years ago,

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and em has spoken in great depth about feeling very

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>connected to her mum during her pregnancy, particularly being pregnant

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>with a baby girl, and she shared a really sweet

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>photo showing a little red birthmark near her daughter's eye

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and wrote angel kisses from Nanny in the sky, which

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>was really sweet. Well, m broke the news on Instagram,

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>sharing a carousel of photos of her newborn with the

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>caption thirteen eight twenty four six seven pm Isla Sue Gambon,

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I've never felt a love like this. We did it,

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and she tagged her partner Joel Gambon. The post received

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>over eighty eight thousand likes and the Blue Tick Brigade

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 1>were out in force in the comments section. So Sammy

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Robinson wrote congratulations, beautiful family. Tammy Hembro added crying She's

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>so perfect. Love you guys, while Skywheetly commented looks like

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>an actual doll. I'm crying. She is a very beautiful baby. Yeah,

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>she's a gorgeous little girl. And Chloe Zepp, Gracie Piscapo,

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Indy Clinton, so for dof jar Da Tunci, Tylia Skeaines

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and Lucy Jackson were also amongst the well known Aussie

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>influencers commenting, I'm assuming Lily Brown did as well, but

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>she's blow I couldn't see her comment well. I also

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>noticed that Nicky and Lucy took time away from their

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 1>amazing trip of Mikinos where they are celebrating Nicky's hands

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to face time with EM. I wonder if they'll be

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>competing with Lily Brown to be sort of like the

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>best to your well, A lot of the time, when

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.719
<v Speaker 1>someone has a baby and there's baby showers and then

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>birthday parties following it, you realize it's such a special

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:26.239
<v Speaker 1>time in someone's life that you sort of drop all

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of that shit. So maybe this will be an opportunity

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>for the gang to get back together bybee Now, EM

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>has been really active on TikTok and she's even added

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Eila's mamma to her name, and her birth video has

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up one million views on Instagram already. So this

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:46.479
<v Speaker 1>video shows all the highlights of the birthing experience. So

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>we see EM and Joel walking into the hospital, as

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>well as EM in the hospital bed strapped up to

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>all of the monitoring systems and EM opted for a

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>vaginal birth, and you can see a photo of EM's

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>mum propped up by her bed as she gives birth,

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>which was just such a sweet touch. The video also

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>shows snippets of Em crying as Joel comforts her and

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>shots of the delivery. Now, a lot of people were

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>commenting who actually filmed this content? I think maybe people

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>were thinking, was it the nurses, it like the midwife videography. Yeah,

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>but it was actually two of EM's friends who were

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>support people, like they were allowed in the birthing sweet

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and they did such a good job. It has only

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>been five days since Em gave birth, but she is

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>delivering on the newborn content. So she shared the hot

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>dad style TikTok video of Joel carrying baby Isler out

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of the hospital in her capsule. That is a very

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>viral video that I'm seeing a lot of creators making.

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>She also shared a hilarious video of her holding her

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>baby in the hospital bed surrounded by sushi, with the

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>caption It's good being zero weeks present. She has been

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>missing that a lot.

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 4>Are you doing those?

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 5>We're running?

0:31:55.400 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Snow, a shop fitting company run by Guy Wheatley's

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>partner Lockie War, has gone into external administration after reportedly

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>being unable to pay its debts now. Amy. This came

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>as a bit of a surprise because Lockie's business, which

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>is called shop fit Co, has recently been running a

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 1>large social media as campaign talking about how they're expanding

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 1>their operations. Yeah, this kept popping up on my Instagram

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>feed for some reason. And shop fit Co is a

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>very well known business on the Gold Coast. It has

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>completed fit outs for a number of high profile shops,

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>including Quicksilver, Muffin Break and also Sassin Byte. There has

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>been no official word yet from Locke or Sky about

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the company going into external administration, and even on Thursday,

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the company was still uploading posts on as social media account. Yeah,

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and shop fit Co is regularly featured in Sky's YouTube videos.

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>So they are renovating their Gold Coast mansion. They've been

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>renovating it for what feels like forever, It's been five years,

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and in recent videos we've seen Locke's staff popping up

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in their shop fit Ko shirt carrying out the renovations.

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if it's because there's not much work for

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>them to be doing on other projects, so like, better

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>get my money's worth and get them working on my

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>own house. Well, the image that they've been portraying, is

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a very successful business. Yeah, they definitely give

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>off this impression that they're very successful. That being said,

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>there have been some whispers about financial issues within the

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>business because there were reports that Locke's company had been

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:27.479
<v Speaker 1>locked in a very bitter court battle with a Sydney

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 1>man since twenty twenty three, and Shopfit Co says that

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the man still owes them close to sixty thousand dollars

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>for a fit out that they did for a Portuguese

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>burger bar. Now things got murkier because the business owner

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>is now countersuing Shopfit, alleging that the work was not

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>up to scratch and they're wanting damages for a breach

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of contract and also loss of opportunity. So it sounds

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 1>like a very stressful time. Yeah, And I think there's

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>also a bit of confusion over this term external administration

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and what it actually means. So for those who are unaware,

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>it basically means that someone from outside of Locke's business,

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>known as an external administrator, has been appointed to either

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>try and save this business, to sell it, or to

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 1>wind it down to try and repay its debts. And

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>according to the Gold Coast bulletin. Shop fit Co is

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 1>being administered under the Small Business Restructuring Program, So this

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>program gives companies with debts of less than one million

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>dollars a last ditch attempt to avoid liquidation. And interestingly,

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:30.280
<v Speaker 1>documents show that the majority of the money that shop

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 1>fit Co actually owes is to the ATO, and there

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>have been a lot of reports that the ATO is

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>undergoing a massive crackdown. So we're seeing a lot of businesses,

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:44.320
<v Speaker 1>especially construction businesses, currently being chased by the ATO for

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 1>unpaid taxes. And this is because there was a pandemic

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>induced hiatus on the ATO enforcing these tax payments. Now,

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 1>this story has been making a lot of headlines, particularly

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>on the Gold Coast, and it's good to see the sky.

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Wheatley has been very sensitive handling this situation with her

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 1>partner because she has been poking a lot of fun

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>at him about it. So over the weekend she shared

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>an Instagram story of Lockey washing her car and she wrote,

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>never seen him do this. I'm giving him pocket money

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 1>since he's broke now with three cry pass Well, surely

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>things aren't that die if she's paying him out all.

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's her sense of humor. A lot

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of fans have noticed that Locke has had much more

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of a presence on a social media account, because previously

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>he would protest to being in a TikTok videos and

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:35.760
<v Speaker 1>he'd begrudgingly appear. But now he seems sort of down

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to be in it, and I wonder if it's because

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>now that his business isn't doing so well, he thinks, fuck,

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:43.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe I've got to have a social media presence online.

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this is a secondary income for me. I think

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's made him appreciate Sky more and he's thought, well, fuck,

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>is Sky's actually going to be bringing in most of

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the income into this family? Maybe I need to support her. Well,

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that's all we've got time for today. Thank you so

0:35:57.239 --> 0:36:00.080
<v Speaker 1>much for listening to another episode. Please don't forget to

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>follow us on Instagram and TikTok. We're at Outspoken Underscore

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the Underscore podcast. Also, you can follow Kate, Sophie and

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I on Instagram. Will be sharing some fun behind the

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>scenes videos soon. A bit of a fun fact. This

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>is the second time we have recorded this episode and

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 1>that is why it is a day late because we

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 1>had a major technical difficulty. We have new recording equipment.

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 1>But we have very old microphones and old microphone cards,

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and one of them is faulty. So you went to

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>sit down on Monday night and edit a amy and

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>my whole microphone was crackling. I tried to edit it

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 1>around it, but it was just absolutely impossible. My husband

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>was so mad at me. I was literally sitting on

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the toilet when you're cold, and I just was like, yeah,

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 1>every time you get some kind of news, you're sitting

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:46.360
<v Speaker 1>on the toilet. Last week it was the Molly and

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Tommy News. Now it was the podcast is when you're

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 1>on your phone, you've got time to scroll anyway, leaving

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:54.720
<v Speaker 1>everyone with that beautiful image. But this episode was recorded

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:56.759
<v Speaker 1>on the traditional land of the Ghana people of the

0:36:56.800 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Adelaide Planes. We pay respect to elders past and present.

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 2>To the past found nas