1 00:00:00,520 --> 00:00:03,600 Speaker 1: Already and this is this is the daily This is 2 00:00:03,680 --> 00:00:15,320 Speaker 1: the Daily. Ohs oh, now it makes sense. Good morning, 3 00:00:15,400 --> 00:00:18,040 Speaker 1: and welcome to the Daily OS. It's Tuesday, the twenty 4 00:00:18,160 --> 00:00:20,360 Speaker 1: sixth of August. I'm Emma Gillespie. 5 00:00:20,400 --> 00:00:21,360 Speaker 2: I'm Lucy Tassel. 6 00:00:21,760 --> 00:00:25,440 Speaker 1: Over the weekend, both Eric and Lyle Menendez were denied 7 00:00:25,520 --> 00:00:29,120 Speaker 1: parole by a California review board. The brothers have spent 8 00:00:29,160 --> 00:00:32,559 Speaker 1: more than three decades in prison for murdering their parents 9 00:00:32,640 --> 00:00:35,960 Speaker 1: in nineteen eighty nine, but renewed interest in the case 10 00:00:36,159 --> 00:00:39,000 Speaker 1: has come to a head since the release of a 11 00:00:39,120 --> 00:00:42,320 Speaker 1: Netflix series that you might have heard of. The brothers 12 00:00:42,320 --> 00:00:45,440 Speaker 1: were re sentenced in May, marking what many saw as 13 00:00:45,479 --> 00:00:49,280 Speaker 1: their best chance at freedom in over thirty years, but 14 00:00:49,640 --> 00:00:53,639 Speaker 1: the parole hearings revealed previously unknown details about their conduct 15 00:00:53,680 --> 00:00:59,000 Speaker 1: behind bars, ultimately leading officials to reject their freedom bid. Today, 16 00:00:59,000 --> 00:01:01,400 Speaker 1: we're going to unpack came out in these hearings, the 17 00:01:01,440 --> 00:01:04,880 Speaker 1: violations that swayed the board's decision, and what avenues remain 18 00:01:05,040 --> 00:01:08,360 Speaker 1: for the brother's potential release. We'll get into that right 19 00:01:08,400 --> 00:01:09,880 Speaker 1: after a quick message from our. 20 00:01:09,800 --> 00:01:17,400 Speaker 2: Sponsor, Emma. This case has captivated the public for decades, 21 00:01:17,600 --> 00:01:19,920 Speaker 2: but it's had a real resurgence in the last year, 22 00:01:20,360 --> 00:01:23,319 Speaker 2: partly due to that Netflix series that you mentioned For 23 00:01:23,400 --> 00:01:25,520 Speaker 2: listeners who might need a refresh, Can you give us 24 00:01:25,560 --> 00:01:28,200 Speaker 2: kind of a rundown. Who are the Menandez brothers and 25 00:01:28,200 --> 00:01:29,160 Speaker 2: why are they in prison? 26 00:01:29,520 --> 00:01:33,120 Speaker 1: Yes? So, Lyle and Eric Menndez, when they were twenty 27 00:01:33,160 --> 00:01:36,160 Speaker 1: one years old and eighteen years old, were found guilty 28 00:01:36,240 --> 00:01:40,360 Speaker 1: of murdering their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez. Now they 29 00:01:40,440 --> 00:01:44,440 Speaker 1: died brutally in the family room of their Beverly Hills mansion. 30 00:01:44,480 --> 00:01:48,240 Speaker 1: This was in August nineteen eighty nine, and initially the 31 00:01:48,240 --> 00:01:51,440 Speaker 1: brothers told police that they had come home to find 32 00:01:51,480 --> 00:01:55,320 Speaker 1: their parents dead, but after months of investigations, the brothers 33 00:01:55,320 --> 00:01:59,760 Speaker 1: eventually confessed and that led to their arrest in March 34 00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:03,680 Speaker 1: nineteen ninety. What was also of particular interest to police 35 00:02:03,720 --> 00:02:06,160 Speaker 1: at the time was how the brothers behaved in the 36 00:02:06,200 --> 00:02:09,440 Speaker 1: immediate aftermath of their parents' deaths. So, their parents had 37 00:02:09,480 --> 00:02:12,760 Speaker 1: been brutally murdered, and Eric and Lyle essentially went on 38 00:02:13,080 --> 00:02:17,679 Speaker 1: a spending spree. They were living extremely lavishly, and that's 39 00:02:17,720 --> 00:02:23,239 Speaker 1: sort of what brought prosecutors into the investigation that ultimately 40 00:02:23,280 --> 00:02:25,920 Speaker 1: exposed that Lyle and Eric had killed their parents. 41 00:02:26,880 --> 00:02:29,040 Speaker 2: After that, they go to trial. In fact, there are 42 00:02:29,200 --> 00:02:32,040 Speaker 2: kind of two trials which I think really brought them 43 00:02:32,080 --> 00:02:34,560 Speaker 2: to the world attention. What do we need to know 44 00:02:34,639 --> 00:02:35,600 Speaker 2: about their trials? 45 00:02:35,840 --> 00:02:38,720 Speaker 1: So, as you mentioned, Lucy, there were two trials, the 46 00:02:38,760 --> 00:02:42,000 Speaker 1: first in nineteen ninety three. Now this was televised and 47 00:02:42,040 --> 00:02:45,000 Speaker 1: became a media sensation, so as you mentioned, that's when 48 00:02:45,040 --> 00:02:48,600 Speaker 1: global attention really started to pick up for this case. 49 00:02:48,840 --> 00:02:51,840 Speaker 1: Each brother had his own jury and both testified that 50 00:02:51,880 --> 00:02:55,200 Speaker 1: they'd killed their parents in self defense after years of 51 00:02:55,240 --> 00:02:58,680 Speaker 1: sexual abuse by their father. So the lawyers in both 52 00:02:58,720 --> 00:03:01,880 Speaker 1: those trials really sought to have the murder charges dropped 53 00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:06,560 Speaker 1: on the grounds of self defense following that abuse. Both juries, though, 54 00:03:06,720 --> 00:03:09,960 Speaker 1: could not come to a unanimous decision. They were deadlocked 55 00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:14,720 Speaker 1: and that resulted in mistrials. So the second trial happened 56 00:03:14,760 --> 00:03:18,120 Speaker 1: in nineteen ninety five. That wrapped up in nineteen ninety six, 57 00:03:18,160 --> 00:03:21,960 Speaker 1: and the judge in that trial limited testimony over the 58 00:03:21,960 --> 00:03:25,960 Speaker 1: alleged abuse, so the self defense argument was essentially ruled 59 00:03:26,000 --> 00:03:29,400 Speaker 1: out in that case, and both brothers were ultimately convicted 60 00:03:29,440 --> 00:03:32,440 Speaker 1: of first degree murder and sentenced to life in prison 61 00:03:32,480 --> 00:03:36,080 Speaker 1: without the possibility of parole. In nineteen ninety six and 62 00:03:36,080 --> 00:03:38,720 Speaker 1: they've been behind bars serving that sentence ever since. 63 00:03:39,200 --> 00:03:42,680 Speaker 2: So nineteen ninety six jumped to twenty twenty four when 64 00:03:42,680 --> 00:03:45,680 Speaker 2: there's that Netflix series that we've talked about, how did 65 00:03:45,720 --> 00:03:47,200 Speaker 2: that change things in this case? 66 00:03:47,600 --> 00:03:51,000 Speaker 1: So there has been this massive surge of renewed interest 67 00:03:51,160 --> 00:03:54,160 Speaker 1: thanks to that show Monsters the Lyle and Eric Menendez 68 00:03:54,200 --> 00:03:57,880 Speaker 1: Story that premiered in September twenty twenty four, so nearly 69 00:03:57,920 --> 00:04:01,640 Speaker 1: a year ago. That series was created by Ryan Murphy. 70 00:04:01,680 --> 00:04:03,800 Speaker 1: It was a dramatization, so we're not talking about a 71 00:04:03,800 --> 00:04:09,800 Speaker 1: documentary series. This was a narrative dramatization kind of guessing 72 00:04:10,000 --> 00:04:12,520 Speaker 1: at what happened. But it's not a definitive recount of 73 00:04:12,560 --> 00:04:16,960 Speaker 1: what happened. But it debuts number one on Netflix around 74 00:04:17,040 --> 00:04:20,120 Speaker 1: the world. It led to this huge social media movement. 75 00:04:20,240 --> 00:04:24,000 Speaker 1: We saw young people and even celebrities like Kim Kardashian 76 00:04:24,560 --> 00:04:28,039 Speaker 1: advocating for the brother's release, trying to kind of call 77 00:04:28,120 --> 00:04:31,400 Speaker 1: for a new trial or for them to be pardoned 78 00:04:31,480 --> 00:04:35,040 Speaker 1: or exonerated. And it also led to new evidence emerging. 79 00:04:35,279 --> 00:04:38,479 Speaker 1: So a musician who'd actually worked with Jose Menendez, the 80 00:04:38,480 --> 00:04:42,560 Speaker 1: brother's father, he alleged that Jose sexually abused him in 81 00:04:42,600 --> 00:04:46,719 Speaker 1: the nineteen eighties, which gave kind of new credibility to 82 00:04:46,760 --> 00:04:50,719 Speaker 1: the abuse allegations. And the brother's lawyers uncovered a letter 83 00:04:50,800 --> 00:04:53,919 Speaker 1: that Eric had written to a cousin months before the 84 00:04:54,000 --> 00:04:57,359 Speaker 1: murders describing the abuse. So this all plays into the 85 00:04:57,400 --> 00:05:01,640 Speaker 1: credibility of the self defense argument. Ultimately, that led to 86 00:05:01,640 --> 00:05:05,040 Speaker 1: the brothers getting resentenced just a few months ago. 87 00:05:05,480 --> 00:05:08,159 Speaker 2: So what is that? What changes for them then? For 88 00:05:08,279 --> 00:05:10,240 Speaker 2: Lyle and Eric if they're re sentenced. 89 00:05:10,520 --> 00:05:14,960 Speaker 1: So the resentencing changed their eligibility for parole. So you 90 00:05:15,040 --> 00:05:17,840 Speaker 1: might remember in nineteen ninety six they were sentenced to 91 00:05:18,000 --> 00:05:21,520 Speaker 1: life without parole, meaning they would never be eligible for release. 92 00:05:22,040 --> 00:05:24,279 Speaker 1: But in May this year, they were re sentenced to 93 00:05:24,440 --> 00:05:27,680 Speaker 1: fifty years to life. Now, normally this means that an 94 00:05:27,680 --> 00:05:30,360 Speaker 1: offender would have to serve fifty years in prison before 95 00:05:30,520 --> 00:05:35,400 Speaker 1: being eligible for parole, but under California's youth offender laws, 96 00:05:35,640 --> 00:05:39,280 Speaker 1: Eric and Lyle became immediately eligible for parole because they 97 00:05:39,279 --> 00:05:42,240 Speaker 1: were under twenty six when they committed the murders and 98 00:05:42,279 --> 00:05:45,720 Speaker 1: they'd already served more than the minimum required time under 99 00:05:45,720 --> 00:05:49,560 Speaker 1: this kind of legal youth offender law. And that brings 100 00:05:49,680 --> 00:05:51,400 Speaker 1: us to last week's parole hearings. 101 00:05:51,800 --> 00:05:54,920 Speaker 2: So then we have these parole hearings late last week 102 00:05:55,000 --> 00:05:58,479 Speaker 2: over the weekend. Both of them are denied, and for me, 103 00:05:58,600 --> 00:06:01,240 Speaker 2: I found that to be really interesting because if you 104 00:06:01,240 --> 00:06:03,240 Speaker 2: take them at their word that they were abused by 105 00:06:03,360 --> 00:06:06,120 Speaker 2: their parents, that's what they allege, then I guess my 106 00:06:06,240 --> 00:06:09,039 Speaker 2: thinking is like, at the risk of being crude, their 107 00:06:09,080 --> 00:06:11,240 Speaker 2: parents are dead, the people like, they can't kill their 108 00:06:11,240 --> 00:06:16,000 Speaker 2: parents again. So then I was interested to hear what 109 00:06:16,040 --> 00:06:19,320 Speaker 2: the parole Board's reasoning was for why they would be 110 00:06:19,440 --> 00:06:21,480 Speaker 2: asked to remain behind bars. 111 00:06:21,160 --> 00:06:24,120 Speaker 1: Because ultimately it's up to the parole board to determine 112 00:06:24,160 --> 00:06:26,920 Speaker 1: if these men are a threat to society, and if 113 00:06:26,960 --> 00:06:29,800 Speaker 1: they're no longer a danger to society, then the argument 114 00:06:29,960 --> 00:06:33,760 Speaker 1: is that they should be released. So it was a 115 00:06:33,839 --> 00:06:38,400 Speaker 1: complex process. Eric's parole hearing actually lasted nearly ten hours. 116 00:06:38,720 --> 00:06:41,040 Speaker 1: Normally these hearings go for about two or three hours, 117 00:06:41,080 --> 00:06:43,200 Speaker 1: so there was a lot to get through and the 118 00:06:43,480 --> 00:06:47,440 Speaker 1: commissioners spent a long time considering the options. So there 119 00:06:47,480 --> 00:06:50,440 Speaker 1: was a panel of commissioners for Eric's hearing that included 120 00:06:50,480 --> 00:06:54,600 Speaker 1: a man named Robert Barton, who focused heavily on Eric's 121 00:06:54,680 --> 00:06:59,000 Speaker 1: past prison violations. This is new information for the rest 122 00:06:59,000 --> 00:07:01,480 Speaker 1: of us. But one of the more shocking details that 123 00:07:01,560 --> 00:07:04,440 Speaker 1: came out from this hearing was the extent of Eric's 124 00:07:04,520 --> 00:07:08,240 Speaker 1: rule breaking behind bars over the past three decades. So 125 00:07:08,440 --> 00:07:13,360 Speaker 1: the board detailed inappropriate behavior with visitors, drug smuggling, misuse 126 00:07:13,480 --> 00:07:18,920 Speaker 1: of state computers, devices within prison, violent incidents, illegal mobile 127 00:07:19,040 --> 00:07:21,160 Speaker 1: phone use. It was a pretty long list. 128 00:07:21,320 --> 00:07:24,240 Speaker 2: Yeah wow, okay, So then what do we know about 129 00:07:24,240 --> 00:07:25,400 Speaker 2: some of these violations. 130 00:07:25,760 --> 00:07:29,840 Speaker 1: So Eric specifically was involved, we've learned with a prison 131 00:07:29,920 --> 00:07:33,200 Speaker 1: gang called the Two Fivers. Now this was around twenty thirteen, 132 00:07:33,680 --> 00:07:36,160 Speaker 1: and it was revealed that he helped that gang with 133 00:07:36,320 --> 00:07:40,280 Speaker 1: a tax fraud scheme. He also had multiple phone violations, 134 00:07:40,360 --> 00:07:42,680 Speaker 1: the most recent being in twenty twenty one, So he 135 00:07:42,840 --> 00:07:47,000 Speaker 1: was repeatedly caught with illegal devices contacting his family and 136 00:07:47,080 --> 00:07:49,680 Speaker 1: friends and wife in the outside world. And there were 137 00:07:49,680 --> 00:07:54,120 Speaker 1: also multiple drug violations, so that ranges from marijuana to 138 00:07:54,400 --> 00:07:58,120 Speaker 1: heroin violations. But Eric was also found with supplies in 139 00:07:58,160 --> 00:08:01,480 Speaker 1: his prison cell to make prison is what it's kind 140 00:08:01,520 --> 00:08:05,400 Speaker 1: of the vernacular term. He was caught inviting someone into 141 00:08:05,400 --> 00:08:08,800 Speaker 1: his cell to smoke marijuana as recently as twenty eighteen, 142 00:08:09,120 --> 00:08:12,880 Speaker 1: and there were multiple physical altercations over the kind of 143 00:08:13,000 --> 00:08:18,320 Speaker 1: first two decades of his sentencing, and inappropriate conduct with 144 00:08:18,680 --> 00:08:22,800 Speaker 1: visitors that included an intimate visit with his wife. Eric 145 00:08:22,920 --> 00:08:26,200 Speaker 1: was found in a prison chapel engaging in sexual activity 146 00:08:26,200 --> 00:08:29,200 Speaker 1: with his wife in front of his nine year old stepdaughter. 147 00:08:29,680 --> 00:08:33,400 Speaker 2: Right, okay, yeah, So then what does he say about 148 00:08:33,440 --> 00:08:34,560 Speaker 2: all these incidents. 149 00:08:34,840 --> 00:08:38,880 Speaker 1: So Eric acknowledged all of these incidents. He accepts that 150 00:08:38,960 --> 00:08:42,600 Speaker 1: they happened. But in the case of the prison gang affiliation, 151 00:08:43,040 --> 00:08:45,839 Speaker 1: because that was a significant concern to the parole board, 152 00:08:46,240 --> 00:08:48,280 Speaker 1: Eric said he only worked with this gang out of 153 00:08:48,440 --> 00:08:51,280 Speaker 1: tremendous fear for his life. Those were the words that 154 00:08:51,320 --> 00:08:53,560 Speaker 1: he used. He said that he saw it as a 155 00:08:53,600 --> 00:08:56,920 Speaker 1: means to survive what he described as an extremely violent 156 00:08:57,040 --> 00:08:59,960 Speaker 1: prison yard. He'd said that he'd seen this gang murder 157 00:09:00,240 --> 00:09:03,480 Speaker 1: personal friends of his inside the prison, so he worked 158 00:09:03,520 --> 00:09:06,880 Speaker 1: with them basically to look after his own safety. He 159 00:09:06,920 --> 00:09:10,760 Speaker 1: acknowledged the broader misconduct, some of those drug allegations that 160 00:09:10,800 --> 00:09:14,000 Speaker 1: I detailed, but said that he came to a turning 161 00:09:14,040 --> 00:09:17,800 Speaker 1: point in the year twenty thirteen. He found his faith, 162 00:09:17,960 --> 00:09:21,680 Speaker 1: his lawyer explained, he became sober, he started engaging in 163 00:09:21,720 --> 00:09:26,320 Speaker 1: rehabilitation programs. So his whole parole argument hinged on that 164 00:09:26,480 --> 00:09:29,840 Speaker 1: from twenty thirteen he turned a corner and started to 165 00:09:30,160 --> 00:09:34,320 Speaker 1: engage in rehab, and the commissioner ultimately was not convinced 166 00:09:34,320 --> 00:09:37,480 Speaker 1: by that. Commissioner Barton said that contrary to the beliefs 167 00:09:37,520 --> 00:09:41,000 Speaker 1: of the Menendez brothers, families and friends and supporters, Eric 168 00:09:41,160 --> 00:09:44,000 Speaker 1: quote had not been a model prisoner, and frankly, we 169 00:09:44,080 --> 00:09:47,760 Speaker 1: find that a little disturbing. Button added, the gravity of 170 00:09:47,800 --> 00:09:50,920 Speaker 1: your crime is not a primary reason for this denial. 171 00:09:51,320 --> 00:09:54,640 Speaker 1: It's still your behavior in prison, which I guess Lucy 172 00:09:54,679 --> 00:09:57,320 Speaker 1: speaks to the concerns around you know, are they a 173 00:09:57,320 --> 00:10:00,720 Speaker 1: threat to society if the people they murdered were abusive, 174 00:10:01,240 --> 00:10:03,080 Speaker 1: or you know, what is the remaining threat to the 175 00:10:03,080 --> 00:10:05,160 Speaker 1: community that there is still a concern there. 176 00:10:06,200 --> 00:10:08,640 Speaker 2: So then what do we know about Lyle's hearing? So? 177 00:10:08,880 --> 00:10:12,480 Speaker 1: Lyle's hearing was the next day in California, on Saturday, 178 00:10:12,559 --> 00:10:16,160 Speaker 1: so overnight on Saturday for us here in Australia. One 179 00:10:16,160 --> 00:10:20,560 Speaker 1: of the commissioners there, Julie Garland, commended Lyle for his 180 00:10:20,679 --> 00:10:24,520 Speaker 1: lack of violence over his sentence, for positive relationships that 181 00:10:24,600 --> 00:10:29,040 Speaker 1: he had formed with inmates. There were behavioral violations, although 182 00:10:29,320 --> 00:10:33,840 Speaker 1: they were fewer than Eric, so Lyle had some violations 183 00:10:33,880 --> 00:10:36,680 Speaker 1: over five of the thirty years that he's been behind bars, 184 00:10:37,160 --> 00:10:41,160 Speaker 1: including mobile phone possession as recently as last year, But 185 00:10:41,480 --> 00:10:46,840 Speaker 1: Garland still denied Lyle parole, saying despite his outward positives, 186 00:10:46,840 --> 00:10:50,760 Speaker 1: the panel still found that he demonstrated quote antisocial personality 187 00:10:50,760 --> 00:10:55,320 Speaker 1: traits like deception, minimization, and rule breaking. And some of 188 00:10:55,360 --> 00:10:59,520 Speaker 1: this has to do with Lyle's acceptance or perceived lack 189 00:10:59,559 --> 00:11:02,240 Speaker 1: of accept over his role in the murder of his parents, 190 00:11:02,800 --> 00:11:05,840 Speaker 1: the brutality of that crime, and his kind of wrongdoings. 191 00:11:06,000 --> 00:11:09,040 Speaker 2: Right, Okay, were there any kind of good points about 192 00:11:09,040 --> 00:11:11,360 Speaker 2: their time in prison that we learned about from these 193 00:11:11,360 --> 00:11:12,600 Speaker 2: parole hearings. Yeah. 194 00:11:12,640 --> 00:11:15,320 Speaker 1: I think what's been interesting since we got this Netflix 195 00:11:15,320 --> 00:11:18,760 Speaker 1: series is that the Menendez brothers lawyers have really sought 196 00:11:18,920 --> 00:11:21,959 Speaker 1: to do a bit of reputation rehab for lack of 197 00:11:22,000 --> 00:11:25,640 Speaker 1: a better term. They've been trying to advocate or platform 198 00:11:25,679 --> 00:11:28,440 Speaker 1: the good work that the brothers have done from behind bars. 199 00:11:28,840 --> 00:11:30,480 Speaker 1: And you know, it has to be said, they have 200 00:11:30,640 --> 00:11:34,120 Speaker 1: done genuinely good work, which was acknowledged by the parole 201 00:11:34,160 --> 00:11:37,920 Speaker 1: board in both hearings. So, Eric, for example, pioneered hospice 202 00:11:37,960 --> 00:11:41,920 Speaker 1: program that's become a statewide model in prisons. He's worked 203 00:11:41,920 --> 00:11:45,360 Speaker 1: with elderly and terminally ill patients and helped them in 204 00:11:45,400 --> 00:11:49,199 Speaker 1: that chapter of their lives in prison. Lyle founded a 205 00:11:49,360 --> 00:11:52,880 Speaker 1: project called the Green Space Project, which has essentially transformed 206 00:11:52,960 --> 00:11:55,400 Speaker 1: the prison yard that he's into a bit of a 207 00:11:55,440 --> 00:11:59,959 Speaker 1: Parkla like setting. There's murals and artworks, outdoor classrooms, outdoor programs. 208 00:12:00,600 --> 00:12:02,600 Speaker 1: So they have done a lot of work to improve 209 00:12:02,640 --> 00:12:06,240 Speaker 1: the lives of inmates in their immediate communities. But the 210 00:12:06,240 --> 00:12:09,400 Speaker 1: commissioners essentially said, you know, if you can't follow the 211 00:12:09,480 --> 00:12:12,080 Speaker 1: rules of a prison, how can we trust you to 212 00:12:12,160 --> 00:12:15,920 Speaker 1: follow the rules of society in the outside world. As 213 00:12:15,960 --> 00:12:18,480 Speaker 1: Commissioner Barton put it, these brothers might have had a 214 00:12:18,480 --> 00:12:21,440 Speaker 1: positive impact on their community, they might have won the 215 00:12:21,480 --> 00:12:25,320 Speaker 1: forgiveness of their family, but quote can still be found 216 00:12:25,480 --> 00:12:27,000 Speaker 1: unsuitable for parole. 217 00:12:27,200 --> 00:12:31,440 Speaker 2: Okay, what have we heard from legal authorities, like from 218 00:12:31,480 --> 00:12:32,920 Speaker 2: the state of California. 219 00:12:33,040 --> 00:12:37,480 Speaker 1: Yes, So interestingly, throughout the course of this resentencing and 220 00:12:37,520 --> 00:12:39,800 Speaker 1: this ground swell of a bit of a movement for 221 00:12:39,800 --> 00:12:44,240 Speaker 1: the Menendez brothers release, California or LA specifically, has had 222 00:12:44,280 --> 00:12:47,880 Speaker 1: a new district attorney appointed. So a man called George 223 00:12:47,960 --> 00:12:51,440 Speaker 1: Gaskin was the DA last year and he was a 224 00:12:51,480 --> 00:12:54,959 Speaker 1: supporter of the Menendez brothers being released. He pushed for 225 00:12:55,040 --> 00:12:58,600 Speaker 1: them to be resentenced so they could be eligible for parole. 226 00:12:59,240 --> 00:13:03,320 Speaker 1: But in December, LA got a new district attorney. Okay, 227 00:13:03,400 --> 00:13:06,440 Speaker 1: his name is Nathan Hodgman, and he is a fierce 228 00:13:06,559 --> 00:13:11,760 Speaker 1: opponent of Lyle and Eric being released. After the hearings 229 00:13:11,920 --> 00:13:14,800 Speaker 1: and the denials of parole, Hotchman said over the weekend 230 00:13:14,880 --> 00:13:17,920 Speaker 1: that the parole board quote correctly determined that the brother's 231 00:13:18,000 --> 00:13:21,960 Speaker 1: actions speak louder than words. He has consistently argued that 232 00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:26,160 Speaker 1: the brothers have quote never fully accepted responsibility and continue 233 00:13:26,200 --> 00:13:29,640 Speaker 1: to promote what he calls a false narrative of self defense. 234 00:13:30,559 --> 00:13:34,920 Speaker 2: Okay, so some strong words there from state authorities. Now 235 00:13:34,960 --> 00:13:37,360 Speaker 2: that both of them have been denied, what's the next 236 00:13:37,360 --> 00:13:38,880 Speaker 2: steps for Lyle and Eric? 237 00:13:39,240 --> 00:13:43,520 Speaker 1: So there are a few avenues remaining. First, both brothers 238 00:13:43,640 --> 00:13:47,319 Speaker 1: can request an administrative review within a year, so they 239 00:13:47,360 --> 00:13:50,760 Speaker 1: could potentially get another parole hearing in as little as 240 00:13:50,840 --> 00:13:51,600 Speaker 1: eighteen months. 241 00:13:51,720 --> 00:13:52,000 Speaker 2: Okay. 242 00:13:52,040 --> 00:13:54,240 Speaker 1: The Parole Board had ordered at the end of these 243 00:13:54,280 --> 00:13:56,920 Speaker 1: hearings that they'd have to wait three years before they 244 00:13:56,960 --> 00:14:00,600 Speaker 1: would next get a shot at parole. But there's also 245 00:14:00,679 --> 00:14:05,320 Speaker 1: an avenue of clemency. Now, this would involve the Californian Governor, 246 00:14:05,400 --> 00:14:09,640 Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom, granting the brother's release, so he has the 247 00:14:09,720 --> 00:14:13,120 Speaker 1: power to do that. The Parole Board's decision has to 248 00:14:13,240 --> 00:14:17,080 Speaker 1: undergo now an internal review, so that will last up 249 00:14:17,120 --> 00:14:19,840 Speaker 1: to one hundred and twenty days, and after that point, 250 00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:24,120 Speaker 1: Governor Newsom will have thirty days to either affirm or 251 00:14:24,240 --> 00:14:28,320 Speaker 1: reverse the Parole Board's decisions. So this means that the 252 00:14:28,360 --> 00:14:31,520 Speaker 1: Parole board decisions could be overturned, the brothers could be 253 00:14:31,560 --> 00:14:34,840 Speaker 1: granted immediate release, but we'll have to wait at least 254 00:14:34,880 --> 00:14:37,520 Speaker 1: five months for an answer, and all of that depends 255 00:14:37,560 --> 00:14:38,440 Speaker 1: on Gavin Newsom. 256 00:14:38,760 --> 00:14:41,280 Speaker 2: Has he given us any indication on where he might fall. 257 00:14:41,640 --> 00:14:45,400 Speaker 1: Interestingly, he's been notably careful. He's tried to kind of 258 00:14:45,440 --> 00:14:49,480 Speaker 1: remain neutral over the last year. Governor Newsom even appeared 259 00:14:49,480 --> 00:14:53,240 Speaker 1: on a podcast with Ryan Murphy, who created the Netflix series, 260 00:14:53,280 --> 00:14:58,040 Speaker 1: where he revealed that he's intentionally avoided watching the show, saying, quote, 261 00:14:58,040 --> 00:14:59,960 Speaker 1: I don't want to be persuaded by something that's not 262 00:15:00,120 --> 00:15:02,880 Speaker 1: in the files of the legal evidence that he would 263 00:15:02,880 --> 00:15:06,760 Speaker 1: be reviewing understandable, but Newsom has acknowledged this is really complicated. 264 00:15:06,800 --> 00:15:09,360 Speaker 1: He said, quote what good can come from sending a 265 00:15:09,360 --> 00:15:11,440 Speaker 1: message that you can kill both of your parents and 266 00:15:11,560 --> 00:15:14,480 Speaker 1: be released. But he also noted that quote other inmates 267 00:15:14,520 --> 00:15:17,800 Speaker 1: have been granted parole for similar or worse crimes. 268 00:15:17,960 --> 00:15:18,160 Speaker 2: Right. 269 00:15:18,480 --> 00:15:21,360 Speaker 1: I would say, though, given the prison violations we learned 270 00:15:21,360 --> 00:15:25,880 Speaker 1: about from these hearings and the DA's strong opposition, it 271 00:15:25,920 --> 00:15:29,560 Speaker 1: would be politically difficult for Gavin Newsom to go against 272 00:15:29,600 --> 00:15:33,280 Speaker 1: that advice. So a reversal seems kind of unlikely. Yeah, 273 00:15:33,320 --> 00:15:35,920 Speaker 1: that being said, though, Newsom has reversed one hundred and 274 00:15:36,000 --> 00:15:40,000 Speaker 1: sixty one paroles for murderers during his time as governor, 275 00:15:40,440 --> 00:15:43,480 Speaker 1: often citing a lack of accountability from offenders, So we 276 00:15:43,600 --> 00:15:46,680 Speaker 1: know accountability is important to Newsome. 277 00:15:47,080 --> 00:15:49,160 Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, and I mean accountability is going to be 278 00:15:49,200 --> 00:15:52,720 Speaker 2: important to him because it's been very strongly speculated that 279 00:15:52,800 --> 00:15:55,360 Speaker 2: he's mounting a run for president for twenty twenty eight 280 00:15:55,360 --> 00:15:57,320 Speaker 2: week exactly, this would be something he'd have to answer 281 00:15:57,440 --> 00:15:58,000 Speaker 2: questions about. 282 00:15:58,080 --> 00:16:01,240 Speaker 1: Yes, so he'll be carefully considering, you know, whichever way 283 00:16:01,320 --> 00:16:02,120 Speaker 1: he decides to go. 284 00:16:02,320 --> 00:16:04,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, not just the Menandez brothers, but also what it 285 00:16:04,880 --> 00:16:09,760 Speaker 2: means for his career. Absolutely. Is there any other pathway 286 00:16:10,080 --> 00:16:13,120 Speaker 2: for the brothers available other than going through the parole 287 00:16:13,160 --> 00:16:15,840 Speaker 2: system or the Gavin Newsom system. 288 00:16:15,960 --> 00:16:19,960 Speaker 1: Yes, So with the clemency and parole options looking a 289 00:16:20,000 --> 00:16:23,040 Speaker 1: little bit further out of reach, now, yeah, there is 290 00:16:23,080 --> 00:16:27,400 Speaker 1: a possibility of a new trial altogether. This could potentially 291 00:16:27,400 --> 00:16:30,560 Speaker 1: see the charges against the brothers dropped altogether. Wow, they 292 00:16:30,560 --> 00:16:34,240 Speaker 1: could be exonerated and released. They did file a petition 293 00:16:34,440 --> 00:16:37,200 Speaker 1: for a new trial based on new evidence, so that 294 00:16:37,200 --> 00:16:40,440 Speaker 1: includes the letter to the cousin and the musician who 295 00:16:40,440 --> 00:16:43,960 Speaker 1: worked with Jose Mendez who alleges abuse, but with the 296 00:16:44,000 --> 00:16:49,240 Speaker 1: district attorney so against their release, yeah, it seems unlikely. 297 00:16:49,560 --> 00:16:52,920 Speaker 1: He has argued that the evidence isn't credible, the new 298 00:16:52,960 --> 00:16:56,200 Speaker 1: evidence and doesn't meet the legal standards for a new trial, 299 00:16:56,760 --> 00:17:00,320 Speaker 1: and legal experts more broadly say that California is a 300 00:17:00,520 --> 00:17:06,399 Speaker 1: famously aunoriously tricky state for this kind of proceeding to 301 00:17:06,520 --> 00:17:09,920 Speaker 1: grant them freedom. So California grants parole to about twenty 302 00:17:09,960 --> 00:17:12,879 Speaker 1: two percent of prisoners deemed moderate risk, which is how 303 00:17:12,880 --> 00:17:16,080 Speaker 1: the brothers were classified. And it really seems like the 304 00:17:16,119 --> 00:17:20,280 Speaker 1: prison violations are kind of the most decisive factor here 305 00:17:20,920 --> 00:17:24,080 Speaker 1: rather than it being about the original crime itself. It 306 00:17:24,200 --> 00:17:27,960 Speaker 1: seems that legal authorities in California are a lot more 307 00:17:28,000 --> 00:17:31,280 Speaker 1: focused on the brother's shortcomings during their thirty years behind 308 00:17:31,320 --> 00:17:35,560 Speaker 1: bars and how that could impact their future behavior in 309 00:17:35,600 --> 00:17:36,280 Speaker 1: the community. 310 00:17:37,359 --> 00:17:40,240 Speaker 2: So to kind of wrap up, nothing's changing for them 311 00:17:40,480 --> 00:17:43,520 Speaker 2: right now, but there's many possibilities in the coming months 312 00:17:43,560 --> 00:17:46,439 Speaker 2: and coming year. Absolutely, so I guess this will not 313 00:17:46,480 --> 00:17:48,320 Speaker 2: be the last time that we talk about the Menandez 314 00:17:48,359 --> 00:17:49,320 Speaker 2: brothers on this podcast. 315 00:17:49,359 --> 00:17:51,240 Speaker 1: Yeah, I highly doubt it will be listening. 316 00:17:52,080 --> 00:17:54,800 Speaker 2: Thanks so much for explaining that, Emma, and thank you 317 00:17:54,880 --> 00:17:57,680 Speaker 2: so much for joining us today. We'll be back again 318 00:17:57,840 --> 00:18:01,000 Speaker 2: with another deep dive tomorrow and again in your feeds 319 00:18:01,040 --> 00:18:04,560 Speaker 2: this afternoon with the evening headlines. Until then, have a 320 00:18:04,560 --> 00:18:10,439 Speaker 2: great day. My name is Lily Maddon and I'm a 321 00:18:10,440 --> 00:18:15,200 Speaker 2: proud Arunda Bungelung Kalkudin woman from Gadighl country. The Daily 322 00:18:15,240 --> 00:18:18,320 Speaker 2: oz acknowledges that this podcast is recorded on the lands 323 00:18:18,320 --> 00:18:21,560 Speaker 2: of the Gadighl people and pays respect to all Aboriginal 324 00:18:21,640 --> 00:18:24,560 Speaker 2: and torrest Rate island and nations. We pay our respects 325 00:18:24,720 --> 00:18:27,760 Speaker 2: to the first peoples of these countries, both past and present,