WEBVTT - The Aussie who claims he invented Bitcoin

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:05.040
<v Speaker 1>My name is Lily Maddon and I'm a proud Arunda

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Bungelung Caalcutin woman from Gadighl country. The Daily oz acknowledges

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 1>that this podcast is recorded on the lands of the

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Gadighl people and pays respect to all Aboriginal and Torres

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Strait Island and nations. We pay our respects to the

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>first peoples of these countries, both past and present.

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Good morning and welcome to the Daily os. It's Friday,

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 2>the ninth of February.

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm Zara, I'm Saram.

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Bitcoin is absolutely everywhere right now. But who actually invented

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.480
<v Speaker 2>the coin? Where did it come from? Well, it turns

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 2>out that we actually don't have the answer to that,

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:47.919
<v Speaker 2>and there is an ongoing dispute as to who.

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Invented the coin.

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 2>It's a dispute that has made its way all the

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 2>way up to the UK's High Court. An Australian man

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 2>says he founded the popular cryptocurrency in two thousand and eight,

0:00:57.840 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 2>but on.

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 4>The flip side, a group of tech have launched legal action.

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Accusing him of forging his identity. We're going to explain

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 2>everything there is to know about the creation of bitcoin

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 2>in the deep.

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 4>Dive but first Sam that's making headlines.

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 3>Toyota drivers could be at risk of having their personal

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 3>information leaked, according to a new warning from consumer group Choice.

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 3>It said Toyota's Connected Services technology collects information such as

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 3>vehicle location, driving data, fuel levels, and even phone numbers

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 3>and email addresses. Choice founds that the service poses significant

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 3>risks to customers privacy and warns drivers data could be

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.119
<v Speaker 3>shared with third parties without their permission.

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 2>The Climate Council says Australians are experiencing what it calls

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 2>climate whiplash from current wild swings between weather extremes. Its

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 2>latest report found almost every state has broken extreme weather

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 2>records this summer after recent floods, bushfires, heavy rainfall, humidity

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 2>and heat waves across the kind. The Climate Council said

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 2>these extremes were signs of a fast warming planet, adding

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 2>that coal, oil and gas burning were key contributors to

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 2>climate wereplash.

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 3>Pakistan has suspended mobile phone service across the country during

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 3>its national election. It's part of efforts by Pakistani authorities

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 3>to ease security concerns after dozens of people were killed

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 3>in two blasts on Wednesday. Terrorist group Islamic State have

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 3>claims responsibility for the bombing attack, and it follows recent

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 3>political unrest and violent protests in the country. Pakistan's Interior

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 3>Ministry said the suspension of phone coverage was temporary.

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 2>And the good news Ozzie diver Alisha Kloy has won

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 2>gold at the World Aquatic Championships in Doha. Twenty two

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 2>year old placed first in the women's one meter springboard.

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Other OZSI metallists included Annamel Smith and Madison Keeney, who

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 2>won silver together in the women's three meter synchronized diving event. Sam,

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 2>do you know who invented bitcoin?

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 3>The two bitcoins to Lores? I know is that one

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 3>of the earliest transactions using bitcoin was buying a pizza.

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay, but that's not answering my question.

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, so. And the other one was that I think

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:09.639
<v Speaker 3>it was someone called Santoshi.

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 4>Okay, do you know anything more than that that?

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 3>We don't know who Santoshi is.

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 4>So it's a pseudonym. Yes, Okay, you're right.

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Cool.

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 4>Ten points for you.

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 2>I love that I was asking you that with the

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 2>full expectation that you wouldn't know the answer. I when

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 2>I was researching this story, was reflecting on this thing

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 2>that my friends and I do that sounds really lame

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 2>when I say it out loud, but it is actually

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 2>a really valuable exercise, which is that every few months,

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 2>and certainly last year, we got together to learn something new.

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.559
<v Speaker 4>We realized that we all have heaps.

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Of skills and understanding and knowledge in certain areas, and

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 2>that that's never transferred through like social groups. Anyway, I digress.

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 2>The reason I'm saying it was we did one on

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 2>crypto right, like a full deep dive on crypto, and

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 2>that was the first time that I heard the name

0:03:56.400 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Satoshi Nakamoto, which I thought was the real name of

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 2>the person that created bitcoin, but it turns out is

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 2>a pseudonym. And we're talking about that today specifically because

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 2>the idea of who actually created bitcoin is in the

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 2>news at this moment in time.

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 3>So why do you give me a really quick tail

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 3>dr from that night with your friends and quickly explain

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 3>what bitcoin is before we jump into this story in

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 3>this current court case.

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 2>So Bitcoin became the world's first cryptocurrency and exchange platform.

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.239
<v Speaker 2>It launched in two thousand and eight, and the central

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 2>idea behind bitcoin was the ability to make payments without

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 2>going through traditional banking channels. So the digital currency runs

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 2>via something called the blockchain, where all transactions are verified

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 2>and connected in sequence, and it goes to this whole

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 2>idea of decentralizing the way that we understand financing and

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 2>money and.

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 4>Power really in the world around us. You're right.

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 2>In twenty ten, a man in the US state of

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Florida made the first commercial purchase using bitcoin when he

0:04:57.760 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 2>brought two pizzas.

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 3>And so the discussion this week is about who invented it.

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 3>And you said before that the person who invented it,

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 3>what we do know is that they used a fake name.

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Right. So Bitcoin's first white paper, as it's called, which

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 2>is just a document describing how bitcoin would work, that

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 2>was drafted under the name I mentioned before, Satoshi Nakamoto,

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 2>And in twenty fifteen several tech publications named somebody called

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Craig Wright, who funnily enough, is an Australian scientif.

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Wow, there's a local angleton I know.

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 2>As the possible creator of bitcoin. Wright alleges that he

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 2>wrote the paper under this pseudonym Totoshi Nakamoto. A bit

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 2>about Craig Wright, who I truly had never heard of

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 2>until this week and had no idea that there was

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 2>any local connection to the story of bitcoin. Craig Wright

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 2>describes himself like this in his Twitter bio. He says,

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 2>the creator of bitcoin, eternal student and researcher in chain, consultant, lawyer, economist, pastor, investor,

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 2>mathematician and husband.

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 4>That's does he have more hours in the day?

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 3>What I mean that a normal person? What an incredible buyer?

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 2>I mean some of those make sense together, some of

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 2>them are a bit confusing anyway.

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 3>So he says he is the creative of bitcoin.

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 2>So in all the spare time he has from being

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 2>a loyer, economist, pastor, investor, and mathematician, son and husband,

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 2>why not create bitcoin?

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 4>He claims that.

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 2>But not everyone is on board with this idea that

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 2>he is actually the creator of bitcoin. Some online reports

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 2>have questioned the claims and have said that he forged

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:31.040
<v Speaker 2>some of his academic credentials. He's right, talking to Kipko

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 2>News in twenty twenty two.

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 5>In twenty fifteen, Wyatt and Gizmoto put a whole lot

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 5>of clap trap out outing me. I didn't want that

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 5>out and a number of other people in Core did

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 5>that to basically muddy the waters about what I was doing.

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 5>I mean, then they came out with a whole lot

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 5>of stuff about fake degrees, et cetera, which there's all

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 5>proven wrong, but I didn't really want to face sort

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.239
<v Speaker 5>of media or any of that at the time.

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Nakamoto's identity has never been verified. And now there is this,

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 2>as I said, ongoing lawsuit as to who actually is

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 2>the real founder. Is it this Australian professor or is

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 2>it someone else?

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 3>And so who's the lawsuit between? Like how does that

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 3>actually work in court?

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 2>So Craig Right, the Aussie scientist, he's launched multiple lawsuits

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 2>against people who have developed bitcoin technology without his consent.

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 2>He claims to hold the copyright to the cryptocurrency.

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 3>You know what's interesting about that claim is that the

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 3>whole idea.

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 2>There's no ownership, Yeah, yeah, is meant to decentralize ownership, right,

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 2>and he were talking about.

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 4>But like if I created something like bitcoin, you.

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Want to cut it.

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So he brought a defamation lawsuit against a blogger

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 2>and a podcaster who said that he wasn't the creator

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 2>of bitcoin. And then now the case that we're talking

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 2>about is a group of tech developers who are suing him.

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 2>They're saying that he falsified his identity and that his

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 2>copyright claim to bitcoin is delaying innovation to the cryptocurrency technology.

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 2>And the group that is suing Right is called the

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Cryptocurrency Open Patent Alliance. We're going to call them COPA.

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 2>It's a group of individuals and organizations linked to the

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 2>crypto industry. And I kept seeing headlines when I was

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 2>reading about this about Jack Dawsey.

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Who's a former CEO of Twitter.

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 4>Correct, he is financially backing COPA.

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so they're well funded.

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 4>Yes, So that's a.

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:29.679
<v Speaker 2>Group that is taking legal action against RIGHT, and they

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 2>claim that developers have been silenced by thread of legal

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 2>action from RIGHT, and they've suggested that the future of

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:35.719
<v Speaker 2>the crypto.

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 4>Industry is at stake.

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 2>The main aspect of the case is looking to prove

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 2>that Right is not Satoshi Nakamoto last month writes intermedia

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 2>release out saying that he had tried to settle the

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 2>case with COPA. The settlement offer included inviting the involved

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 2>parties to make a donation to a specific Australian church

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 2>which runs community support services. So that was one of

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 2>the elements of this settlement, which is fascinating another was

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 2>ending what he labeled as any media campaign against me

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 2>and committing to ensure that bitcoin isn't used to lauander

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 2>money or evade taxes. So those were the conditions that

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 2>he wanted to settle. Ultimately, COPA rejected that settlement offer,

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 2>and it's now gone to court in the UK.

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 3>So we've now got that core case playing out. What's

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 3>been happening in the courtroom.

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so, Copa's lawyers this week alleged that Wright had

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 2>committed forgery on an industrial scale.

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 4>It's a direct quote there.

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.559
<v Speaker 2>He stands by his claims obviously that he is the founder,

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 2>insisting that he never forged any of these documents. Part

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 2>of his defense rights defense will also rely on proving

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 2>that COPA can't actually provide an alternative for who this

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 2>pseudonym actually is.

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Right. I think it's so if you don't know any better,

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 3>it could be me, I do. I think I'm not

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 3>saying I invented bitclaim. It definitely wasn't me. When I

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 3>was fourteen, I was thinking about you know, footy.

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 2>No one has successfully proven that it was them, right,

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 2>and so in the absence of being able to identify

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 2>it right as saying, well, if you can't identify anyone else,

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 2>and I'm saying it's me, you know, go forth with

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 2>that knowledge, And that's the case that's playing out in

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 2>the court at the moment.

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 3>I think it's just absolutely fascinating to think about how

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 3>much this technology has changed the world and has the

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 3>potential to be even more embedded into our financial systems.

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, in the last twelve months, it's just been

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.599
<v Speaker 3>adopted by a country as a sovereign coin for the

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 3>first time, that's El Salvador. But yet despite that impact,

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 3>we don't know who the owner is, whether it's Craig

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Right from Australia or well.

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 2>I think that's why it's you know, we always talk

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 2>about this news versus noise. I think ordinarily, if I

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 2>was reading a piece about something like this, I would

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 2>think it's noise.

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:46.079
<v Speaker 4>But I think you're right.

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that the significant impact it has made in

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of all economic spheres means it actually is really

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 2>important where it came from, what its origin is, what

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 2>the use of it was originally, and what the intention

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 2>was because it's reshaped everything.

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 3>But interestingly, it wouldn't matter who invented it if Craig

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 3>Wright wasn't taking action to stop the development of it.

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 3>So in some ways he's trying to kind of stand

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 3>his authority on this coin. I mean, we don't know

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 3>who invented money. I'm sure somebody does, but if there

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 3>was a claim to patent money that would be very

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 3>interesting as well. Well, you've got the answer of wow,

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 3>those existential questions. Ends the week.

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us for another week on the Daily Odds.

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 2>If you have found us through the Daily Drive, welcome.

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 2>We're back next week for another big week in the news,

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 2>but until then, have a fabulous weekend

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Already and this is the Daily Oh now it makes sense.