WEBVTT - 'Charity' Back Flip, The 'Ugly' Table & Getting Older

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Outspoken. The podcast is not afraid to say

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you're thinking. Our names are Amy Kate and

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Sophie Torva. We're identical triplets, but we often don't have

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>identical opinions, so sometimes things can get hated. Outspoken covers

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>all things reality TV, influencers, entertainment, and issues facing women.

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>That is so fat Thank you. I had a moment

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>on the weekend where I realized I was a proper adult. Now.

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I know we're thirty two, but I do think you

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 1>can be in your thirties and still not officially an adult.

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that a bit like Sophie not being a real

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>adult Because I have come to her house so many

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>times and I'll go to the downstairs bathroom and There'll

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>be no toilet lot that happens every time I'm here.

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, well, no, it's more the upstairs bathroom. And

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>so I was like, oh, we didn't bring it upstairs. Look,

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm practically a gens eta here. I date someone five

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>years younger than me. I'm trying to keep it pretty cool,

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>so I try and you know, pretend that I've gotten

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>these things. I do like that you've actually admitted that

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it is a five year age difference because in our

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Facebook community you were trying to push it at four

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and I had to correct you, Well, it's technically four

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>point five whatever, So okay, can you tell us what

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>it is? It actually made you an adult? Okay? So

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I realized that. So we've got two bathrooms, but we

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>also have soap in our laundry and our kitchen, so

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>basically four soap like pump dispenses and that three is it? No,

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>we've got two bathrooms? Oh okay. So I decided that

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>we needed more soap, and I made the adult decision

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to buy a one liter bottle of the liquid soap

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>because it was cheaper and it was better for the environment.

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And I was walking around the house and I had

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 1>such joy filling up my soap dispenses. I just felt like,

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>really accomplished from it. I hope my boyfriend he does that.

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>So you say that we're not adults, but he literally

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>buys soap like it's going out of fashion. But that's

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>more because he's a German. No, but does he buy

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the Lida bottle?

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 3>He does?

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, brand is the adult in your relationship? Do you

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>know what makes me feel like an adult? Is when

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I actually bring my reusable bags to the shop. That's

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>something I always forget and day will be like, have

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you got your bags? And the other day I actually

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>remembered them and I felt like such a legend. Oh well,

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean resent and I get paid out for doing

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>our big shop, which I think is pretty normal. And

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I've got to say, we always bring our disposal bags.

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:20.839
<v Speaker 1>And do you know what is the saddest thing I'm

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>outing myself. We have a competition to see who can

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>get closest to how much the groceries going off that

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel like my life has hit an ultimate low

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>when that is happening on the weekend. Because we always

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>joke that when we hear you doing your big shop,

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>but that's like you're outing for the day. Oh that's

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 1>a bit me a reward if you get it right. No,

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just the pride of guessing it correct. We'll talking

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>about the soup mark. I feel like this is another one,

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>another moment where you kind of realize you're either an

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>adult or old. It's when you're walking along the aisles

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and you hear a song and you're like, wow, I

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 1>love this song. This was an absolute banger back in

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the day. That's funny you say that because Reese's mum

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>actually apparently only shops at Cole's because they play good music. Really, Yeah,

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>do you know what another one is?

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 3>I was thinking about this the other day.

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I actually saw this on TikTok, and it was saying

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that when you're in your twenties, you just, you know,

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you use a makeup wipe and you just chuck it

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>in the bin. But when you're in your thirties, you

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>use that makeup white to then wipe down your sink

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 1>and your bench. And I find myself doing that all

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the time. I couldn't relate to that one at all

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>because my sink is literally covered in orange powder. Yeah,

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>yours is gross. I don't use the makeup wipe because

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it's got makeup on it, but I

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>do do that with a tissue. I've got to say, well, maybe, Kate,

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you need to start actually doing it. And so, especially

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>if your sink's a orange, which they shouldn't be orange

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>in the first place, you need to use a makeup

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>whe if my landlord is listening listening white every time.

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I actually had a moment this week at work where

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I felt really old So this twenty year old girl

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>came in and she's like doing the social media for

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a fashion brand in Adelaide, and she wanted to pick

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>my brain about Facebook advertising. And I was scrolling through

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.119
<v Speaker 1>having a look at posts that the page had made,

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, oh, is that Lauren Gibbs. So she

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>is about I think thirty, and she dates Bryce Gibbs,

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>who's a Crows player, and I was like, Oh, bad,

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>should we be naming her? It's very inchly. Well, no,

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:15.839
<v Speaker 1>I think she's absolutely gorgeous. And I was like, oh, wow,

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>so she's modeling for your page, and then the girl goes, yeah,

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>she actually attracts a bit of an older audience, like

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I think she's like thirty five forty, And I knew

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>she was younger than me, and I was like like,

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>as in, Lauren Gibbs is younger than me. And I

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>was like, Oh my god, how old does she think

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I am. It's funny you say that because we had

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>another incident where it was about age. So when Kate

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and I were at kok car but this is going

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to pump out tops. I'm pumping up my own tires here.

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>So we were at Kokhr and we chatted to the

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>girl last weekend that we were there, shows them many

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>times with it, and she knew that it was our birthday.

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>So when she saw her, she's like, how is your birthday?

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Are you heading out this weekend? And I said, I'm

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>heading to Kate's house just to go out for to

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>have dinner at her house. I'm like, what about you? Yeah,

0:04:58.440 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>head and to RCC.

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Just going over to Kekes to fill up some soap dispensers.

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, we had tacos. So she's like, yeah, just

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>heading to the Royal Croquet Club tonight and I was like, oh,

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been there at all this year, probably haven't

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>been there for about five years. You know. The phrase

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you kept using was back in the day. And I

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>knew this girl did not think we were thirty two

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>because she dropped that she was twenty one, and she

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>was kind of talking as if we were on the

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>same level, which I really appreciated. Yeah, so the conversation

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>got so awkward. We had to say I'm sorry, but

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>we're a lot older than you. And then she was

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>shocked and we said that we were thirty two. She

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>thought we were about twenty three, So, like I was

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>feeling on top of the world for the rest of

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the week. And then I also reflected we were wearing

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>active wear with our hair pulled back. I was like,

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>should I start dressing like a bit more I don't know, older,

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>like I was a bit more sophistical. Sure, yeah, I

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>was gonna ask, were you guys wearing your new jeans

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and no middle part? I actually, well, I actually do

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>have a middle part, so maybe that's sort of why.

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>But no, I wasn't wearing my big wide fat leggage jeans.

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't have them. And I'm actually beginning to be

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>really uncomfortable whenever I go out because I just don't

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>even know what to wear, Like I hate everything at own.

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:09.840
<v Speaker 1>It was wearing most Guinea jeans the other day, and

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Brandon's like, oh, so you've opted for your old lady

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>jeans today.

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 2>See. The thing I think is just got to make

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 2>charity sexy. And I did that really, I mean, it's

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 2>how I started. I was one of the first who thought, well,

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, charity is pre or it just ends up

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 2>like this, you know, just sounds.

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Up like a sort of sad shop like this.

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 2>The only people who come into the shop are the

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 2>ones that need the charity anyway, So what's the point.

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>On Monday's episode, we discussed how micro influencer Caitlin Rodriguez

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>branded her influencer garage sale as a charity event, despite

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>not naming who the charity is and how much is

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>being donated. Now we have a bit of an update.

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Since the episode aired, Wasteless has subsequently deleted its previous

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>post about the event, including the poster, which included comments

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>questioning where the money is going and the commentary surrounding

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the ah triablec laws regarding the event. Now, a new

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>event poster has instead been put up and the words

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>charity event have been taken down. It instead says that

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent of ticket sales and fifty percent of revenue

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>from all stall higher is going to the charity. It

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>has been confirmed by Wasteless in the comment section that

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>no money from the sale of the actual clothing is

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>going to the charity. It's actually so embarrassing for Wasteless

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>because they pride themselves on donating a minimum of ten

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>percent of every sale that they make through the website. However,

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>for the charity event or so called charity event that

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>goes out the window. So that doesn't make any sense

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to me. Something on Now, you're giving fifty percent of

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>stall higher, but what does that actually mean? Because does

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Wasteless only hire one stall or does each influencer that's

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>donating clothes have their own store? And surely that's not

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>an expensive thing to do. And I'm sorry, how embarrassing

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that they're charging the influencers who are in all of

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>their marketing collateral to pay for a stall higher, Like

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any sense. Wouldn't it be the money from

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 1>their clothes that they're selling. And plus her boyfriend and

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>is an owner. Well ex boyfriend owns the market that's

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>been selling, so surely they're getting mates rates for those

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>stall well, just to reiterate your original point, Kate, a

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>follower asked Caitlin on the Wasteless Instagram whether the money

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>from the sale of the clothes actually goes to the charity.

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Caitlin confirmed this is from our online store. A minimum

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of ten percent of every sale goes directly to PLAN

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>when purchased from our online store. The in real life

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>market is a one off activation and is separate to

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>our online store. However, we still wanted to give back

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to Plan, so fifty percent of the proceeds from the

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 1>event in brackets stall, higher and entry go directly to plan.

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>So I'm a little bit confused here. Why when you

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>do this automatically for a charity, do you then tell

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the event a huge charity event and you're not doing

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 1>the original offering. What blows my mind even further is

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>now they're offering a bring a friend along if you've

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>already purchased a ticket, So obviously ticket sales aren't going well. However,

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:58.079
<v Speaker 1>they're cutting into the apparent donation revenue. Can I just

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>point out it's obvious that Wasteless listen to our podcast

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>because our podcast page has since been blocked from being

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>able to view their Instagram and only since the episode

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>aired have they actually answered questions about where the money

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to. Also, in regards to the fact that

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>they're allowing people to bring in a friend for free,

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>does that not show what their true motivations are. Their

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:21.839
<v Speaker 1>motivations isn't to get as many people there to raise

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>as much money for the charity. Their motivation is to

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.959
<v Speaker 1>get people there to buy clothes, which then goes into

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the influencer's pocket and Wasteless as pocket. Do you know

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 1>what I find embarrassing is the whole thing. Yeah, I

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>find it awful for the influencers who've been dragged into

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>it in terms of there are some big Sydney Sydney

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>influencers who are coming along to this event. There's Sammy Robinson,

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>there's Amelia from Love Island and Josh from Love Island

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and by all accounts, these influencers have no idea that

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>this is not truly what it has been touted as

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 1>originally as a charity. Do you think that? Do you

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>not think that they should be doing their due diligence

0:09:57.640 --> 0:09:59.559
<v Speaker 1>and look into it themselves. And we don't know what

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>they've actually been told. We don't know if they were told, hey,

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going to toeut this is a charity event, except

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you're making bank on all of the clothes that you

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>got for free, did you guys? See a comment also

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>from Kaitlyn saying that they hadn't actually named the charity

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>because they hadn't got final sign off. Why are you

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>promoting it then? Exactly right? And it sounds odd that

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>they didn't get final sign off despite already aligning with

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that brand for their apparent ten percent off on their

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>every purchase. Would you know what was quite I found

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>quite humorous. Another user wrote under the photo on Waces'

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Instagram saying, I really doubt that you guys are paying

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>for the market still fee. Hope no one attends the event.

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Support local and small businesses with a great course. And

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Caitlyn replied, and this comment has subsequently been deleted. She said, Hey,

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you for your concern with full transparency, we are

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>in fact paying Bronte Surf Life Saving Club a venue

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>higher fee. We are running ads, paying other marketing expenses

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 1>in brackets, signage, purchasing tables, clothing racks, and staff fees.

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Resistant on the assistant on the day, it's like, well,

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.839
<v Speaker 1>how much really goes into creating a crappy poster which

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you've had to redo? It looks checking a bit behind

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Facebook advertised. It looks like it's been created on canvas,

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>which you can get for free. And also event bright

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>which where how they're flogging the tickets off is a

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>free service too. And I'm sure that the Bondi Bizarre

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Market have a few tables that are easily accessible. Isn't

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that what you're paying for when you're hiring the store?

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>What do you guys, how do you guys think Wasteless

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>are making money because is it the influencers that are

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>receiving the full amount that people, you know, when people

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>go to buy their clothes, or are they receiving the

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent of ticket sales? No, I believe that the

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>influencers receive a percentage for the close the same way

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:39.839
<v Speaker 1>when they share them through the website. So do you

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>know what though? That is interesting because yeah, normally if

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>it's sold through the website, they claim that you know,

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Plan gets a ten percent. However, Caitlin then gets the

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>money also because she's taking the photos and organizing the sale,

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>whereas if these influencers are actually having to attend the

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:58.959
<v Speaker 1>event and sell their own clothes and pay you to

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>have a stare, I don't know how Wasteless and Caitlin

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>are making any money off. That's maybe why they took

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the ten percent. Maybe ten percent's going to her rather

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>than Plan. You mean fifty percent? Well, I wonder if

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 1>that's why they suddenly have ticket sales and only because

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>this podcast called them out, have they gone, oh shit,

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>we better say that fifty percent is donated to charity

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and they must be taking the other fifty percent. Do

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I found quite amusing. Today. The influencers

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>started sharing the new poster on their social channels, but

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Jade Tunci's sister clearly didn't get the memo because she's

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>not even calling her baron know who she is, Jardi

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>Twincy's sister. She shared the old poster which had that

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 1>it was a charity event and wasteless still reshared it.

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 1>If you've got, you know, all this spend on marketing,

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>would you, as the person who's doing the marketing not

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 1>say take that down immediately and put up the correct

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 1>marketing collateral. Well, I haven't actually seen any Instagram or

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:53.559
<v Speaker 1>Facebook ads it. That's not to say they don't exist.

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>But do you think this marketing spend she's referring to

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.839
<v Speaker 1>is actually paying the influencers to promote the event? Well,

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>she claimed it was for signing. They must have a

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>big sign outside of the Bronti Surf Club. If someone

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:07.959
<v Speaker 1>in our Facebook community floated the idea of attending the

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.719
<v Speaker 1>event just to tell us what was going on, I mean,

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 1>what a legend in the first place. But if you

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>do happen this weekend to go let us know what

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it's like. And I mean at least the money some

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of the money. Don't buy any of the clothes because

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:21.679
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to charity, but support it through the

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>ticket sale. Or maybe just go down to your Vinnie's

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>and buy some clothes. I was gonna say maybe the

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Vinnie's a Beck Judd frequents. I'd like to go to

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 1>that one. And just to wrap it up, we actually

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>had our listener send us a really great podcast recommendation

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.719
<v Speaker 1>on this topic. So the Culture Club have done a

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>really great podcast regarding greenwashing and fast fashion and I'd

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:43.839
<v Speaker 1>highly recommend checking that out. We'll leave the details in

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>our show notes.

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 4>How much Willter Johnny do you think has gone in

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 4>to grow in the cotton necessary to make this jacket?

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 4>Throwing the cotton to make that jacket will have taken

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 4>ten thousand, three hundreds As Sir Elita's water.

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into the influencer rab and. On Saturday afternoon,

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Abby Chatfield went on a four minute rant on an

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Instagram story about her outdoor table. Now, Abby was sent

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the wrong table by a furniture company and she was

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>not happy about it. I've got to say it really

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>reminded me of Sophie. The last couple of weeks going

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>off about her mobile phone. Oh my gosh, let's not

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Can we not have him repeat what the issue was

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>with him? I know Sophie has had some issues with

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>their phone. It's been sent back. We're not sure if

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>said issues have been fixed. But she was a bit

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>red ross. I would say, oh my god, Age Ragefield.

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh it's taking all of my energy not to name

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>my phone provider because they have been absolutely hopeless. Now,

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>let's not get you started, Sophie. But it was quite

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>reminiscent you're ranting. It was reminiscent of Abby's rant on Instagram. Yeah,

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>but the difference is Sophie didn't put on Instagram. No,

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean I could have. Yeah, she was close to

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>putting on Instagram. I do actually get the frustration of

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>being sent something that's completely wrong, and I do I

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>have a different opinion on this story than you do,

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>K because I think it was she was trying to

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>be funny with this read. Yeah, No, I definitely think

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>it started off funny. So Abby explained that she'd spent

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a month choosing an outdoor table. She'd actually paid someone

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to put it together, and the company, as I said,

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>sent the wrong table. So She actually went to a

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>story and said that the table was so ugly that

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it made her feel physically uncomfortable having it in her house.

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>So I'll just throw to a little bit of a

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>snippet of her rant. It isn't even that bad.

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 5>It just it's just, oh my god, I'm not even kidding.

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 5>I know if it's like my anxiety or it's I'm

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 5>actually getting angry looking at it because it doesn't go

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 5>with my apartment. So like, look at my beautiful like

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 5>something like eyes. Everything goes, everything makes sense, Everything has

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 5>been like curated. It takes me so long to choose

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 5>anything and then look, really, oh my god, it's so

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 5>it's so just like it looks.

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Like, oh.

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 5>Makes me feel physically ill. The man who made it

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 5>was really nice.

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>And really helpful.

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 5>I'm not being drammic. It's given me genuine anxiety looking

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 5>at it. I can't look at it.

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll give it to Abby. She didn't actually name the brand.

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>She did threaten that if they didn't rectify the situation,

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>she may name them. However, it was very dramatic. Do

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what I found really interesting? She was mentioning

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there was silver little nuts and bolts,

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I suppose on the table and she says, nails whatever.

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>There was some silver element on the table and it

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't go with the rest of the aesthetics of her house,

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>which she's a very gold bronze show, but she said

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>she didn't. I just love Sobey's take on this. She

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>just said that she doesn't have any silver in her house,

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>any silver jewels. It just reminded me because I remember

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>when I was working with a group of girls, all

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of them was so funny about you can't wear gold

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>jewelry and then have a silver buckle on your belt,

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and I, literally, I'm not the most observant person that

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is never struck me as something that seemed to look

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 1>I think she was joking. I know that she was joking,

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>but it just reminded me of how so many people

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>think that that's so important that you can't have clashing jewelry,

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and I get that look. I found her rant kind

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of funny. I found it a little bit over dramatic

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:17.879
<v Speaker 1>considering what's actually going on in New South Wales with

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the flooding at the time. However, I got to the

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>point it was like, you know, as I said, the

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>video went for four minutes, and it started to annoy

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>me when she was going on that she hasn't had

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>a break for six to twelve months and that she

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>actually hires a lot of people to do stuff because

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>she just doesn't have the time. Now, it seemed a

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>bit contradictory considering she had enough time to rant about

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the table, and then she started getting really passive aggressive

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>with her followers. It seems to be a bit of

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.479
<v Speaker 1>a trend at the moment. Now. I understand people can

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>be annoying in DMS, Like I'm not talking about like

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 1>not that I've ever experienced it, but when I see

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 1>influencers sharing some of the feedback they get like, obviously

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the negative stuff's horrible, but even just sort of like, oh,

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>like really obvious things. And if you're getting that huh

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of times, I can see how that would be annoying.

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>But also, you know how to bite the hand that

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>feeds you. But do you It's not think that she's

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>just creating content by having a rant about the table.

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I think she's talking about it because it's something that

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>is relatable. I think what Kate's saying, though, is a

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of followers were annoyed because they felt like she

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>was ranting at them when they were trying to help her.

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>And also, so if I've got to say, I don't

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>think she was being relatable because for most people, purchasing

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a outdoor table, it's actually really expensive, and then getting

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>someone to make the table and then having a rant

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>about how ugly this table was when it really was

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty basic table. I kind of liked the table, Yeah,

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really like. I like the one she chose.

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>She actually chose like a lot. However, it's not like

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it was some hideous thing like, of course, you know,

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 1>return the table. It's not what she ordered. The whole

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>thing is exactly No, that's fine. I completely understand the rant.

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I get it. I think sometimes Abby she's coming across

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.199
<v Speaker 1>as joking and that maybe some people don't pick up

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that it is a joke. And that's

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>what she probably finds frustrating, because we've got to remember,

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>she's receiving these dms constantly from people who were reading

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>so much into everything she says. It would be frustrating,

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>but she probably should have just put down her phone

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and not said anything more about it. Well, it was

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>quite clear that her rant pissed off a lot of

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>her followers because she was getting a lot of messages

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 1>calling her privileged, and I did find that disappointing because

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I did feel like she was coming across as privileged

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and I felt like she's almost in that transition where

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>she's changed a little bit, that she's been an influencer

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>for quite a while now, and simple tasks she's sending

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>off to air time. I disagree, though, because I saw

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 1>it popping up a lot on a lot of different

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>podcast groups that I follow and people were saying that

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>they were disappointed by the way that she reacted. But

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's any differently than she's reacted in

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>previous insert stories. I mean, she's just I find her

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>insert stories really funny. I think she was just trying

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to be funny. I think it was all a bit

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of a joke and then people took it too literally. Yeah,

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I get the joke part. But I think the thing

0:19:56.880 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that's changing is that she used to lash out at

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>people weren't following her, like these are people in the

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>media or other people that had made negative commentary towards her,

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and of course lash out at them. But now she

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>seems to be lashing out at her own fan base,

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's quite dangerous for an influencer to do.

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>As I said, it's biting the hand that feeds you.

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 1>You if you're getting people to unfollow you because you're

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, they've sent you something that they think is

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>helpful and you've actually then she was calling people out

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in a DM screenshotting things and you know, leaving people's names,

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>which was not content that was like bullying. It was

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>actually helpful advice. I do get that, and I don't.

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think if someone's sharing helpful advice, you should

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>always be thankful for it.

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 3>However it is.

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>It would be hard to continually be called privileged all

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the time, and I think that Abby does a lot

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>for women's rights, and I think that it's hard because

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the time people online will label other

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>people as privileged anytime they complain about anything. I mean, okay,

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 1>even you referenced, oh with what's going on with the floods,

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, yes, it is awful what's going on,

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>but there can be issues in your life that you

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>were still annoyed about by something bigger happening in the world.

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And I was the tone, it was the tone. It

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>was like, do you think I've got time to do this?

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I hire people to do this. Like it really rubbed

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>me up the wrong way, and I was a joke though, No,

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't like. I think we'll play some of the

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>clip to put into that I do.

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 5>I think she was.

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 3>Joking about that.

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I think she thought that she was explaining explaining why

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>she couldn't do it, and maybe it came across the

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>wrong way. I'm going to put the clip here and

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>people can make their own assumption about it.

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 5>Sorry, but I actually didn't ask if I should sand

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:29.400
<v Speaker 5>down the table and try out some arts and crabs

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 5>and send and change the corners and change the legs.

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 5>First of all, I haven't had a day off in

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 5>probably at least six months, probably more towards a year.

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 5>I haven't had to do some sort of urgent work,

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 5>so barely have time to call mom. Don't have time

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 5>to be doing sanding of tables. Sorry, m B, it's

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 5>not what I ordered, So we'll just get replaced. Send

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 5>the email. It's all good. Some you know, when you

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 5>ask someone or you've been to someone about something and

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 5>you'd asked for a solution, should they give you a

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 5>solution anyway, and you're like, it's not what I want

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 5>to want a bent that's what like one hundred of

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 5>you do my dams right now, guys, I have such

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 5>little time and energy that I get Air Tasker to

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 5>do everything, Like next week, I'm then to hang up

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 5>all the paintings I want.

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>You know why, because I don't.

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 5>I don't have the time or the energy, all the

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 5>craftsmanship to do it. I paid someone on Air Tasker

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 5>to do this. If I'm not going to put the

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 5>table myself, am I gonna sand it down to make

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 5>it more like the table that I bought, despite the

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 5>fact that it was the issue of the supplier, not

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 5>of the purchaser.

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Me.

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 5>No, So don't need your solutions. About one hundred of

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 5>you my dms literally being passive aggressive, some of you,

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 5>some of you being like babe obviously just sang it.

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Down and restain it.

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, I don't want to.

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 5>I don't want to, so I'm.

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Not going to. Moving on and Laura Burne has caused

0:22:56.720 --> 0:23:01.919
<v Speaker 1>some controversy after she unknowingly labeled a inclusivity doll terrifying

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and also scary as fuck on her Instagram story. Now,

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Laura was out and about with her toddler, Marley May,

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and she was in the Kmart toy section and Marley

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>was playing with a doll and she said, I think

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:14.959
<v Speaker 1>we have enough crying babies at home. We don't need

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 1>another one. She's then zoomed up on one of the

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>dolls in the island said this baby here is truly terrifying.

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>This is a scary af doll. At that point, she

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>zoomed up on the doll and you could see that

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the doll was labeled as baby Amelia with Down syndrome. Now,

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the second I saw this story, I knew that there

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>was no malice intended and it had been a complete mistake,

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>And I actually felt sick for her because she's just

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>given birth to her second daughter, Lola, a couple of

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>months ago, a couple of weeks ago, really not long.

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's been six weeks, and she was obviously

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>racing around trying to do everything, and it's just been

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a complete disaster, especially with well Down Syndrome day celebrated

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.640
<v Speaker 1>on the day after on the Sunday. Yeah, I saw

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>this too, and my stomach drop because you just knew

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that there was As you said, Kate, there was no

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>malice at all behind this, and I just knew that

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>this was going to be huge on social media. I

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>was just thinking about the daily mail headlines. I think

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the thing that was really promising, though, was people saw

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it for what it was a mistake and not something

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that she intended, and I think that was really helped

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>by the heartfelt apology she put out there. So let's

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>play a clip of it.

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 6>I just want to quickly jump on here, and I'm

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 6>probably drawing more attention to something that I fuck me.

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 6>I just can't even begin to describe how sorry I am.

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 6>I have just received a whole heap of messages from

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 6>people I put up a story make were running through

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 6>Kmart and I was like, this doll looks scary. Af

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 6>is exactly what I said. And there was a dole

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 6>in Camart that I thought, genuinely just thought looked tired.

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 6>And so many of you guys have messaged me to

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 6>let me know that it was actually an insity doll

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 6>and I feel sick.

0:24:55.800 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 1>To my stomach, but a mistake that I made, so

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea and I'm really really sorry for

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it was totally unintentional. This is an excellent example of

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>how to make a public apology. She was extremely sincere,

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and she took full responsibility. I mean she even cried

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in it. You can't put that on I do think though,

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a really helpful reminder for those who have big

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 1>followings to be so careful with what you post. I mean,

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe film and then once you're sitting down and you're

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, looking at the story properly post. I mean,

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>this poor woman, she's got a newborn baby and also

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a toddler. She's probably had no sleep and has taken

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>her daughter to the shop. So I do feel really

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>sorry for her, and I also feel for anyone who

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>may it may have caused any upset for any families.

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think she's addressed it really well and hopefully

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:49.479
<v Speaker 1>we can all just move on from it. And as

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you said, Kate, a great example of maybe how other

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>influential people should apologize if they've been caught out doing

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the wrong thing. Are you ready to hear POD's verdict?

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>If I messed, Yeah, you have computes. You are a fantastic,

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>totally plastic queen of the umpo lumpers. Are you gonna

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 1>do to me? Card? I'm going to turn you into

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a natural beauty. Okay, let's get into snog Mary and avoid,

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and we've actually decided to rate triplets. Well they're not

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>really triplets, but they bloody all look the same. They're

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>influencers Tylia Scanes, Alie Alton, and m Davies. Because I

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>thought it was quite interesting because, as I said, they

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>all look the same, but they've got a different personality.

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:30.400
<v Speaker 1>So they're all blonde, about a size six. You're kind

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of typical looking influence, big boobes, big boobs, yep, lip

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>fill of that type of thing. I feel like this

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>is going to be really difficult to choose. Look now,

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>it's quite easy for me. I would marry Tarlia Scanes.

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>I actually think she's got a great personality. She's smart,

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>she's a lawyer, she's got a biller and Barley. Yeah,

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna pick Tarlia. I think I'm gonna have to

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>choose to avoid. Alie Outon after her terrible brand launch

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the other day, has at She also been known for

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>injecting ten or something. Yes, it did come out on

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a YouTube video. So she put up a clip of

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>her to do list and it said in jec tan

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and that was swiftly taken down. Yes, I don't think

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 1>that really aligns with my value, so I will pash

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>M Davies. She'd be a bit wild on the party scene,

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe, so party pash with M Davies. I have

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to agree with. I have to agree with the Tylia

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Scaines one because I actually genuinely do like her. She

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.120
<v Speaker 1>comes across as a really likable person on her Instagram,

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a bit more down to earth than the other two.

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>She even gets macis let's be fun, and she seems

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 1>to cook for Mitch, which I like, and she is smart.

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I reckon I'd have a bit to talk to her about.

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>But with the others, can I choose to avoid both

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of them? Because I just would have zero interest in

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 1>speaking to you. You have to be one to kiss. Oh,

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I reckon Allie's maybe Alie. I don't like how M

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Davies has that chair that looks like it belongs in

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the hospital. Oh my gosh, she just told what I

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>was going to say. I was literally going to say

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that I could not live with M Davies so I

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>couldn't marry her because of her taste in furniture. That

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>shocker chairs A Pasha still surely Yeah, Pasha on the chair.

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh anyway, I think.

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 1>I would have to choose to Pash m Davies just

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>for the Cloud, because I think she's a bit more

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>she's more famous.

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 3>I suppose you realize that we're actually joking.

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't. No one thinks I'm being serious. Anyway, I've

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>got an I think they seriously think we want to

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>pass it. But I met through the cloud. Oh yeah,

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean obviously Tulliuscaines. She seems really lovely, really switched on,

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>really intelligent. She's got absolutely bang a body as well.

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I've got to say that, yeah, yeah.

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 3>And then i'd avoid Allie.

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I think. Well, I think that's all we've got time

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>for today. We do have a really exciting episode coming

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>on Monday. I'm salivating over it already. I'm really excited.

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be joined by a huge media lawyer

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>in Sydney, a very well known one. It's actually your

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>personal lawyer, isn't it, Amy. He's fine.

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 3>How fancy do I have sound having my own personal work.

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, he's my he was. That's my lawyer when I

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>was going through certain legal issues with a big network.

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>He's well known in the business, and he's going to

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>be talking to us about the legalities around celeb spulture.

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Can I just specify that he's not your lawyer to

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>defend this podcast. He's been your lawyer to defend you

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>in a previous life. But he's around if anybody does

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, if any influence comes out of the woodwork

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>tries to sue us, is this like, are you trying

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to threaten them that you know? Yeah, we know lawyers.

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to threaten anyone. We're just going to

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>have a great chat with him on Monday. We really

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>want to get to the bottom of whether influencers like

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>this is defamation if it actually is. Yeah, So you

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>can't wait for you to join us. And as we said,

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>if you do have time, this is a passion project

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of ours and if you do enjoy the podcast, we

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>would love if you could leave us a review, preferably

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a five star one. Please drown out some of the

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>negative reviews that the influencers, I mean, other people have

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>been leaving alms.

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 3>If you love our toilet Talk, maybe that's a reason

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:52.959
<v Speaker 3>to give us five stars.

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>And could you also share it with a friend because

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I suppose that's the only way it's going to grow

0:29:56.760 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. Or share it on your Instant story and

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>tag us at outspoke an Underscore the Underscore Podcast, and

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>have a lovely weekend