WEBVTT - The census backlash and backflip

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Already and this is the DAILYA, this is the Dailias.

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh now it makes sense. Hello, and welcome to the Dahlias.

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm emma, i'm zara.

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 3>The federal government has backflipped on its decision not to

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 3>include questions about sexual orientation in the next census.

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 2>It follows mounting pressure from.

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 3>LGBTQ plus advocates and several government MPs.

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 4>In today's deep dive, we're going to take you through

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 4>the census controversy, the backlash, and most recently the backflip.

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 4>But first, m what's making headlines today.

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 3>The bodies of six Israeli hostages taken by Hamas on

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 3>October seven have been recovered in Gaza. According to Israeli officials,

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 3>defense forces were led to the bodies of three men

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 3>and three women following an operation lasting several hours on

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Saturday afternoon. One of the hostages, kidnapped Baijamas from the

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Nova Music festival in southern Israel last year, was a

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 3>US citizen whose parents recently spoke at the Democratic National

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:15.119
<v Speaker 3>Convention in Chicago. It's not yet clear when and how

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 3>the hostages were killed. It comes amid continued efforts to

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.559
<v Speaker 3>negotiate a hostage release and cease fire deal.

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 4>Senior European Union officials have refused to recognize the legitimacy

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 4>of Nicholas Maduro as Venezuela's leader. Protests and political tensions

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 4>have continued in Venezuela since claims of election interference After

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:40.479
<v Speaker 4>its recent vote. The Venezuelan government has insisted Maduro won

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 4>the election. However, opposing candidate Edmundo Gonzalez declared victory after

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 4>an independent vote count. The Supreme Court has been accused

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 4>of corruption after it ruled in favour of Meduro's victory.

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 4>During a meeting of EU officials, the union's vice president said,

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 4>quote clearly Madua cannot be recognized as a legitimate winner

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 4>of this presidentidential election, that the situation in Venezuela was

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 4>quote critical.

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 3>X has been banned in Brazil after a Supreme Court

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 3>decision to suspend the platform. The country's top court ordered

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 3>Telco's to block access to the popular platform formerly known

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 3>as Twitter, over concern around right wing content and misinformation.

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 3>It comes after Elon Musk's refusal to comply with local laws.

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Several months of negotiations ended in the mass outage when

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Musk failed to meet a deadline to put forward a

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 3>new legal representative for x in the region. Brazil has

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 3>the fifth largest digital population in the world. Musk has

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 3>condemned the suspension order as quote illegal political censorship by

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 3>what he called an evil dictator cosplaying as a judge.

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 4>In today's good news, the FBI has returned stolen artifacts,

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 4>including sacred human skulls, back to Vanuatu. The sacred artifacts

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 4>were returned through the US Embassy in Canberra. An FBI

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 4>representative in the pacifics said, quote, there's no better feeling

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 4>than returning these artifacts to their rightful owners. We are

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 4>still a couple of years away from the next census,

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 4>and I forgive you if you don't know when that is,

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 4>because I can't say that. I think about when the

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 4>next census is very often, but it's in twenty twenty six.

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 4>And last week it really dominated the headlines. Emma, why

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 4>was that the case?

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 2>That is right?

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 3>The headlines have related to whether or not the twenty

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty six census would include questions about sexual orientation, gender identity,

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 3>and variations in sex characteristics.

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 2>It felt like there were new updates.

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 3>And twists and turns rolling in by the day on

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 3>this one culminating in a backflip from the government.

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 2>But we're going to make sense of all of it

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 2>for you today.

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, I think that a good starting point is

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 4>to just explain what we're talking about when we were

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 4>referred to the censors.

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.119
<v Speaker 1>So let's start there. What's the census.

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 2>So every five.

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Years, the Australian Bureau of Statistics that's the ABS conducts

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 3>a national survey known as the Census. It captures details

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 3>and trends about Australia's population, so things like health, age, housing,

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 3>cultural background and religion. Now, the ABS says that governments

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 3>use that data from the Census to make important decisions,

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 3>but it goes even further than that. Census data really

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 3>provides a snapshot of life in Australia at a certain

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.239
<v Speaker 3>moment in time, and those findings are used to inform

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 3>all sorts of decision making, so they're used across community groups,

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 3>not for profit organizations, businesses, and the data is also

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 3>interpreted by researchers and academics to support various studies into

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 3>different research fields.

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 2>So census data.

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Provides information to inform all of that, but it also

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 3>provides a really important comparison tool. So you know what

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 3>changes between each census, What do we learn about how

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:01.039
<v Speaker 3>Australia is, changes.

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 4>From demographics, changes all of those sorts of things.

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 3>But and this is really at the heart of what

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about today, the census has never included questions

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 3>or has never captured data on sexual orientation or gender identity.

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 4>When this story started to dominate headlines, I was a

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 4>bit confused because I remember the last census was in

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty one. It was in the throes of a

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 4>very dark lockdowne and I remember there being this similar

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:31.239
<v Speaker 4>concern at the time about a lack of LGBTQ plus

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 4>representation in that sensus. What happened from all of those

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 4>conversations happening back in twenty twenty one to it now

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 4>being in the headlines again.

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Exactly so, like previous surveys, the twenty twenty one Census

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 3>didn't include questions about sexual orientation, gender identity, or variations

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 3>in sex characteristics so for example, intersex people. And in

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 3>August twenty twenty three, two years later, the ABS issued

0:05:57.520 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 3>a statement of regret.

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 4>What's that presumably quite literally, just means they regret something.

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Well, as you kind of touched on there were

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 3>numerous complaints about the lack of LGBTQ plus representation in

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 3>the questions of the twenty twenty one survey. So following

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 3>those complaints, the ABS said, it recognizes that some members

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 3>of the lgbtiq plus community experienced hurt, stress, anguish, and

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 3>other negative reactions to some census questions.

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so that was in twenty twenty three, that statement

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 4>of regret by the ABS. What happened after that, Like,

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 4>was there any process to I guess remedy If you

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 4>regret something or issue a statement of regret, one would

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 4>presume you then intend to remedy it moving forward. What

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:43.359
<v Speaker 4>did that process look like?

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, that process certainly looked as though a kind of

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 3>remedy was underway. Towards addressing those concerns, the ABS launched

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 3>an lgbtiq plus Expert Advisory Committee for the twenty twenty

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 3>six Census to quote provide guidance an input into the

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 3>census topic, review and framing of census questions and the

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 3>way that census data is processed and disseminated. By the

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 3>end of twenty twenty three, the ABS ended up consulting

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 3>with more than one thousand people and organizations on future

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 3>census questions from that. The ABS also said it was

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 3>considering a question about sexual orientation due to a quote

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 3>lack of a reliable evidence base. It also said it

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 3>was considering adding sex recorded at birth as a question

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 3>to the twenty twenty six census and updating response categories

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 3>to quote improve data quality.

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 4>You mentioned there this question of sex recorded at birth.

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 4>Can you just elaborate a bit on why that was

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 4>an important thing to have captured, or at least why

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 4>the advice was that might be important to capture.

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so separate questions about sex assigned at birth and

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 3>gender would give us a specific data set relating to

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:57.679
<v Speaker 3>transgender people and the number of transgender people in Australia.

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 3>So the twenty twenty one census did include dude one

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 3>question about sex that had three gender options male, female,

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 3>or non binary sex, and that was the first time

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 3>a non binary option was included in the census. The

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 3>ABS said that that was to allow respondents to participate

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 3>in the census when the male and female sex categories

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 3>might not accurately describe their sex, but that new category

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 3>was not intended or designed to collect data on gender,

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 3>so therefore the number of people who reported a sex

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 3>of non binary on the twenty twenty one census. Quote

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 3>could not be used as a measure of gender diversity,

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 3>non binary, gender, or transgender communities.

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 3>According to the ABS, sex is defined as being based

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 3>upon a person's sex characteristics, such as their chromosomes, hormones,

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 3>and reproductive organs. A person's gender is about social and

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 3>cultural differences in identity, expression, and experience as a man, woman,

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 3>or non binary person. As gender is not currently listed

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 3>as a topic on the Sense and Statistics Regulation, the

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 3>ABS said it did not ask this question on the

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty one census.

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so let's just recap where we're at.

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because I feel like.

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 4>You know, every single one of these is a huge

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 4>point to dive into. But essentially what happened was the

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 4>last time that there was a census was in twenty

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.679
<v Speaker 4>twenty one. In that census, there were a number of

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 4>things that different groups felt were not included and therefore

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 4>they did not feel represented members of the LGBTQ plus community.

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 4>Following that survey, the ABS did issue a statement of

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.959
<v Speaker 4>regret and said that they were embarking on a journey

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 4>in which I guess address these concerns, and one of

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 4>them was about the fact that the true number of

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 4>transgender people in this country was not being adequately or

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 4>accurately represented in the census. Okay, so the ABS said

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 4>it was considering adding a sex recorded, a birth question,

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 4>a sexual orientation question. Was there anything else that you

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 4>know leading up to the next census we heard from

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 4>the ABS they were really looking.

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 3>At There was a third proposal, and this will become

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 3>important when we talk about the government's latest position on

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 3>the twenty twenty six sensus. The ABS noted a significant

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 3>data gap on those with variations of sex characteristics, like

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 3>intersex people. It said understanding the number of people with

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 3>differences to their innate, genetic, hormonal, or physical sex characteristics

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 3>can help plan resources to support individuals and their families.

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 3>The ABS said in a statement, the small size of

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 3>this population group means that sample surveys are unable to

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 3>produce both national and lower level estimates.

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 4>And I mean, I think this really goes to the

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 4>heart of why so many members of the LGBTQ plus

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 4>community have felt so strongly about this story. You know,

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 4>so often these sorts of conversations get dragged into kind

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 4>of culture war territory. But all this is meant to

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 4>be doing is capturing the reality of what this country

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 4>looks like and where you know, resourcing should go, and

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of just getting a true representation of the demographic

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 4>so that when those conversations happen, there is actually an

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 4>evidence bace that you know, people can point to and say,

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 4>these are the numbers we're talking about.

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's surprising to me this kind of bias that

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 3>has been attached to the idea of collecting data. I

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 3>think the argument about why the questions would be included

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 3>is about providing a picture of modern Australia.

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>A snapshot exactly where we're at.

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 4>Okay, And so we've spoken a lot about the ABS

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 4>and the work that they've been doing. Why has this

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 4>conversation now come up in the news recently?

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 3>So after the ABS conducted that analysis and consultation that

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 3>we've gone through. The Labor Party said last year that

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 3>it was committed to making sure quote the twenty twenty

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 3>sixth Census gathers relevant data on LGBTIQ plus Australians. So

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 3>we've got that on the record from the government last year.

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 3>But then on Monday a week ago, it's said it

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 3>would not be including those abs updates that were recommended

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 3>on sexual or orientation and gender in the next survey.

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 3>Assistant Employment Minister Andrew Lee told TDA it is the

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 3>decision of the government that there will quote be no

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 3>change to the topics in the next census which will

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:14.359
<v Speaker 3>be held in twenty twenty six.

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 4>Okay, and that triggered just immediate and quite visceral backlash

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 4>from the Australian community. Can you walk us through the

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 4>response that followed from the government coming out with this position.

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, as you say, the fallout was pretty widespread and immediate.

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 3>National advocacy group Equality Australia said the government had quote

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 3>betrayed lgbtiq plus people around.

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Australia. CEO and A Brown said the.

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Community was again going to be quote rendered invisible in

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six because the census wasn't going to ask

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 3>appropriate questions about their lives, and the CEO of lgbtiq

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 3>plus Health Australia, Niki Bath, said that there would still

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 3>be significant data gaps needed to address the pervasive health

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 3>and well being disparities in the community.

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 4>So very strong response there from the community, but there

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 4>was also a very strong response from inside the government,

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 4>and I mean, I think it should be said that

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 4>it's fairly rare.

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>For members of the government.

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 4>We know that the Labor Party has rules about crossing

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 4>the floor and all of these sorts of things, and

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 4>this wasn't a piece of legislation, but still it was

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 4>quite remarkable to see a number of members come out

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 4>and say we disagree with the government's position. Can you

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 4>talk me through some of the political fallout.

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So we saw a group of six Labor MPs

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 3>come forward in the end criticizing their party over the decision.

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 3>As you say, not a piece of legislation, but still

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 3>rare to see so many people within Labor criticizing a

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Labor decision. That movement was led by Labor MP Josh Burns.

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 3>He told TDA that the community deserves to be counted.

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 3>He said the data collected in the census helps with

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 3>government decision making and the delivery of services, and therefore

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 3>I think we should reconsider the questions we put forward

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 3>in the twenty twenty sixth sense. Some Coalition MPs also

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 3>supported adding the questions, but Opposition leader Peter Dutton said

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 3>that he felt pretty happy with the existing survey. And

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 3>he questioned what he called a woke agenda. The Greens

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 3>accused the government of failing to do the bare minimum

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 3>in data collection when it comes to the census. Green's

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 3>lgbtiq plus spokesperson Stephen Bates said the lack of data

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 3>on lgbtiq plus Australians was stalling necessary reforms to healthcare

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 3>and education. By Friday morning, Australia's Sex Discrimination Commissioner had

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 3>also weighed in. So Doctor Anna Cody, who is the Commissioner,

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 3>wrote a letter to the Assistant Minister for Employment Andrew Lee,

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 3>talking about the sort of implications of the decision for

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 3>the health, wellbeing and general equality of the community of

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 3>LGBTQ plus Australians as well as their families. She pointed

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 3>to the kind of significant health disparities faced by the

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 3>lgbtiq plus community compared to hetero and cisgender Australians and

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 3>emphasized the message that we'd heard from a lot of

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 3>other groups just about the importance of accurate population data

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 3>to inform decisions on you know, health and mental health services.

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 3>She said it was a matter of practical, effective policy.

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 4>So you've painted a picture of just significant pressure mounting

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 4>on the government kind of from every angle, both within

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 4>their own party, you know, opposition, Greens, people outside the system.

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 4>How did the government respond?

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 2>So? Anthony Albanezi, the Prime Minister, did.

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 3>An interview with ABC Radio on Friday morning where he

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 3>said there will be a question about sexual preference in

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 3>the next census, depending on the findings of ABS testing.

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 3>So to unpack that, he said the government had been

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 3>in discussions with the ABS and that they were going

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 3>to test for a new question. He said that would

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 3>be quote one question about sexuality, sexual preference. Albanezy said

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 3>that the ABS will be testing making sure quote that

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 3>people will have the option of not answering it or

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 3>if they prefer not to answer, And he said that

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 3>as long as the testing quote goes okay and a

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 3>question can be developed in a way that's sensitive and

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 3>that gets the information that is required, the ABS will

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 3>be testing that with a draft question. Now, I do

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 3>want to point out that Albaneze's comments only related to

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 3>a question about sexual orientation. He did not imply that

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 3>there will be any kind of testing on questions to

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 3>do with gender identity or variations in sex characteristics, which

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 3>were the proposals suggested by the ABS after that statement

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 3>of regret in twenty twenty three.

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so the government essentially backflipped. They came out with

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 4>a position, it was deeply unpopular and they've now kind

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 4>of walked it back. Was there any explanation given?

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Albaneze pretty much downplayed it. He said that the government

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 3>thinks the census has been pretty effective in the past.

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 3>He noted what he thought about the censors being the

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 3>incorrect vehicle to engage with the community across various issues,

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 3>and he downplayed the census, saying that it's not the

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 3>be all and end all. He also noted other data

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 3>collection strategies that are available to us now, including on

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 3>our phones and through social media, so that arguably felt

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 3>like a little bit of a distraction. He did defend

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Labour's track record on anti discrimination legislation, though he noted

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 3>the survey isn't for two years, and I think a

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 3>good point that was made is that there is an

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 3>election to get through next year. The survey comes the

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 3>year after that, so a lot could change in the

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 3>makeup of the government between now and then. But I

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 3>do want to note there was some discussion around the

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 3>government not including questions representing LGBTQ plus Australia in the

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 3>next census to avoid discrimination and harmful conversations. But kind

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 3>of ironically you could say that is where the conversation

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 3>ended up going. The sexist Crimination Commissioner pointed out that

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:06.199
<v Speaker 3>failing to address those concerns identified by the ABS and

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 3>BUY advocacy groups after the twenty twenty one survey risked

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 3>doing exactly that. Commissioner Cody said she was concerned in

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 3>the face of rising negative retrick that it could strengthen

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 3>the voices of discrimination and division. That quote seek to

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 3>disrupt the nation's social cohesion. I thought this was a

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 3>really strong quote from the Commissioner to finish on. While

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 3>we must seek to minimize harm, the answer cannot be

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 3>to do nothing. LGBTIQA plus Australians and their rights must

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 3>be protected and supported, as must the rights of all Australians.

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 4>M a really interesting deep dive, and I know that

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people would have seen these headlines but

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 4>perhaps not understood.

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 1>All of that context.

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 4>So thank you for explaining that and thank you for

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 4>joining us for another day on the Daily ODS.

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>If you learned something from this.

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 4>Episode, feel free to leave a covent on Spotify or

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 4>wherever you're listening. If you're watching us on YouTube, we

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 4>love to know what you're thinking and feeling about the

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 4>topics that we cover here at TDA. We'll be back

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 4>again tomorrow, but until then, have a fantastic Monday. My

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 4>name is Lily Maddon and I'm a proud Arunda Bungelung

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 4>Calcuttin woman from Gadighl Country. The Daily oz acknowledges that

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 4>this podcast is recorded on the lands of the Gadighl

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 4>people and pays respect to all Aboriginal and Torres s

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 4>right island and nations. We pay our respects to the

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 4>first peoples of these countries, both past and present,