WEBVTT - 📺HOW AUSTRALIAN TELEVISION CHANGED FOREVER?  📺

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to TV Reload. My name's Benjamin Norris, and

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast I'll be going behind the scenes with

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the biggest players in television today. On the show, I

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>have broadcasting and senior management consultant Tim Kluchus, who has

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>over forty years experience in the TV business. Some of

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>his career highlights include his role as executive producer of

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the nineties TV series Sex, where he challenged Australian audiences

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>with taboo topics that gave us the answers to questions

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>we felt too embarrassed to ask. Feeling confident about Sex

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>led to a show called Money, a hugely successful show

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>which gave millions of Australians control and confidence over their

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.919
<v Speaker 1>finances in a world where ignorance was preyed upon by

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the powerful and corrupt. It'd be hard not to talk

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>about what he did next, As he said about making

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>TV for a new century, Bringing Big Brother to Australia

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>was groundbreaking television which paved the way for unscripted drama

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that would change the face of TV forever. Dancing in

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>some pretty impressive circles, Tim allowed us to feel a

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>part of the programs you made, and reinvented ways in

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>which Australia could feel enriched by the topics he covered.

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to welcome to the show, television mastermind, Tim Klucas.

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 2>This is the best job in the world. I'm making

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 2>television today and welcome to money. You had most of

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 2>the nations sitting down in front of the television every night, Marlin,

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 2>are you going to speak? If you gave them good content,

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 2>they gave you ratings. When it comes to a better

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 2>sex life, wouldn't you rathers do it with a tend

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 2>We certainly could have given the audience credit for being

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 2>more intelligent, the.

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Heaviest contestant in Biggest Loser history.

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, the storm was coming, but there was no one

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 2>or two or three things we could have done. I

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 2>don't believe.

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 4>How are you mate? Are you good?

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm good. I'm good as good as a bloke can

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 2>be at.

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>This age, with forty years in the business and a

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>resume that proves that you have made such a monumental

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>impact when it comes to working with television network, What

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>does a career in television feel like for you at

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>this stage?

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 4>Kind of looking back.

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 2>I got to say that, looking back, I feel that

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 2>I had the best years of the television business. I

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 2>don't know that for a lot of younger people in

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 2>the mainstream television business, I don't believe that most of

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 2>them can look forward to at limitless horizon, to exciting

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 2>opportunities things like that. It may come, but it will

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 2>be in very different forms to the way that I

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 2>experienced the business. And so I've got to say, I

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 2>think people of my generation probably did have the best

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 2>of times. Television was that little special box in the corner.

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 2>There was no Internet, there was no streaming. You had

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 2>most of the nations sitting down in front of the

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 2>television every night, and so they were a willing, grateful audience.

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 2>If you gave them good content, they gave you ratings.

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 2>And that was a great time in television.

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Interesting did you say that because people have turned away

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>from freeedoware television, we're now celebrating shows that are making

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>six hundred thousand, no longer celebrating shows that go over

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a million. What would you say, looking back at some

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of those key moments that people did look for other

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>places to find story.

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the writing was on the wall for a

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 2>long time. All of us in television were saying Hey, look,

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 2>there's going to be streaming services. The internet is going

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 2>to be once you had decent broadband, people are going

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 2>to just be able to watch content from anywhere in

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 2>the world. They don't need to watch seven, nine, ten abcsps.

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 2>We were all talking about it, and it was sort

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 2>of like we had a head in the sand. We

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 2>all knew it was coming, but we just sort of

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 2>pretended it wasn't And instead of setting about reinforcing the business,

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 2>the networks are basically just tried to cannibalize the business,

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, fighting over viewers in a diminishing market. Maybe

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 2>that's what they have to do for their business, but

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 2>doesn't grow the market. It's not a common sense approach

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 2>to making your business successful into the future. You can

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 2>get your ratings this week by putting a cooking show

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 2>against a cooking show, or a renovation show against a

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 2>renovation show. Yeah, you might win this week's ratings, but

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:19.799
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the day, you're losing the audience

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 2>over a longer term.

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>You have been such an amazing contributor to storytelling. Are

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>there moments now when you're sitting back and looking at it,

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 1>we could have done something different.

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 2>I think hindsight is a wonderful things we all know,

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 2>not a characteristic that anyone in television is blessed with again,

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's that driver for the ratings. Eight

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 2>thirty tomorrow morning is much more important than five years

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 2>down the track, ten years down the track. And so

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't point to any one moment or two or

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 2>three moments in the business when we could have reversed

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 2>the bus and gone down another road. Because it was

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 2>death thousand cuts. Yes, the storm was coming, but there

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 2>was no one or two or three things we could

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:09.799
<v Speaker 2>have done. I don't believe we certainly could have given

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 2>the audience credit for being more intelligent. They don't appreciate

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 2>us saying the show finishes at eight thirty and then

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.280
<v Speaker 2>we keep it going to a quarter to nine. They

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 2>don't appreciate us scheduling programs that are like each other

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 2>against each other. They don't appreciate us doing obvious product

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 2>placement just to get money in the door. They resent

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 2>all that, and they don't see that happening on their

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 2>streaming services. They don't see the streaming services just playing

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 2>with start times to suit themselves or to suit their advertisers,

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 2>or to suit their competitive instincts against another network, and

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 2>so I think longer term, had we treated the audience

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 2>with more respect, I don't think they would have been

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 2>so happy to just abandon and pay each week every

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 2>night for a US streaming services when there are twenty

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 2>something free to wear channels that should offer everything possible,

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 2>but they don't, and so people are paying for television

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 2>when it used to be free.

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>Is it too ridiculous to think that competitive television networks

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>should have been programming things differently instead of doubling up

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>on content that's too similar. Do you think it's too

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>simplistic or it's too nice to think that they could

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>have programmed things differently.

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 2>It's probably naive to think that, because the end of

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 2>the day, they're competitive businesses, and if one network is

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 2>doing a really good job with a show that's rating

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 2>really well, well, another network will have to take that

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 2>slot on with either a similar show to try and

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 2>dilute the audience of the opposition, or an alternative show,

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 2>which then gives the audience that frustration. Well, now I

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 2>like them both, and I can't watch them both because

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 2>at the same time, and they're probably stripped shows, and

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 2>so I can't record one and watch the other because

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I'll never catch up, and so I have to not

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 2>watch that show, and that leaves that sort of resentment.

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely diluted the audience because you know, you're looking

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, We've got Holly Molly married at first sight,

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>an amazing race. All three shows reality shows stripped taking

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>up people's minds, you know.

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, we used to do a lot. I don't

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 2>know how much research does actually go into audiences now

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 2>because it's it seems to all be run by the

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 2>advertisers rather than the networks. But we used to find

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 2>you would put out your promos for a new series

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 2>and survey companies would survey likelihood of watching, and you'll

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 2>get amazing numbers. People will see a promo and they go, yeah, yeah,

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I'll watch that, and then they didn't. And when you

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 2>go back, they were saying, well, I was worried that

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 2>if I liked it, I'd get hooked on it and

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 2>then it would just take the next eight weeks of

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 2>my nights out of the picture. And I didn't want

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 2>to get hooked on it, so I didn't watch it.

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 2>That is a funny situation to be in because that's

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 2>good news for the network, meaning we got the show right.

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Bad news is they're not going to watch it, and

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 2>there's lots of examples of that, and I think again

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:24.679
<v Speaker 2>there are economic revenue reasons why the stripped reality shows,

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 2>which I was molding right at the start, why the

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 2>networks ran with those, but they also had a habit

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 2>of killing the audience.

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>What is interesting about television from being my age is

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that it always felt aspirational to me, being the viewer

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>at home. Do you think that the people sitting at

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>home these days are less likely to want to be

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>the people that they see on TV?

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Sure, sure, And there's no doubt about that. And

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 2>that's probably an evolution of our society too. I mean,

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.439
<v Speaker 2>in the days gone by, when the television was that

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 2>magic box, people would look at Graham Kennedy or Burt Newton,

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Don Lane and look up to them. But that doesn't

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 2>necessarily bring your eyes. These days, you are more likely

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 2>to get eyes, particularly within a younger audience, with road

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:17.959
<v Speaker 2>crash and so you're not going to successfully have married

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 2>at first sight unless you have people brawling on it

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 2>and look at it and look at you know, bachelor,

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Bachelorette you know those shows. They're all about the brawl,

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 2>not about finding love or whatever.

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I also think it's more accessible these days for people

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>as well, because you can actually be on these shows.

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>There's so many of them. So you sitting at home

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>before couldn't be Daryl Summers because that was impossible. But

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>then you could be Sarah Marie. You know, you could

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>be Guy Sebastian. The idea of making television that way

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>also probably diluted the audience's ability to go I'd love

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's out of reach.

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 2>Well yes and no. Yes, it makes it a platform

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 2>for many people rather than few. But the fact is

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 2>ninety nine point ninety nine nine percent of those people

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 2>aren't a Daryl Somers, you know, they aren't. To Graham Kennedy,

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 2>they are not performers. We always used to talk and

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 2>when we'd be casting Australian Idol or X Factor or whatever,

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 2>someone who get up on the stage and you could say, well,

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 2>they've done a lot of singing into their brush in

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 2>the bathroom. Whereas those old timers like the Daryl Summers

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 2>and the Graham Kennedy's, you know, they they were seasoned

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 2>performers and they it was their life it was running

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 2>in their blood. And that's different to watching something on

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 2>the internet and thinking I could do that, or filming

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 2>yourself in your living room and getting twenty followers and thinking,

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 2>oh gee, I'm a star. That's not doing it in

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 2>front of a thousand people live or anything like that.

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I think for some people, they think that they're interesting

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>when they're not, and that I've got friends who think

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that they're uninteresting and they're fascinating.

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 2>And like I say, that is the result of doing

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 2>something in your bedroom and putting it on TikTok or

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 2>whatever and people thinking you're really interesting, but you're not.

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's also really funny that TikTok has shown

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>us that a five second piece of content and content

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 1>creators making those shorter pieces are excelling. However, your stripped

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>shows are getting longer. You know, it was only probably

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>eight years ago that they extended your regular reality shows

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>from a sixty minute broadcast to now ninety minutes, and

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 1>that it seems like these shows go longer, and you think,

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>but the education and the knowledge that's out there is

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that people want to digest things in a shorter period

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of time.

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but that's simple economics. You know, you get a

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 2>situation where stripped reality show A series one and two,

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 2>the network twenty million dollars for fifty hours. They have

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 2>to sit down some bean counter somewhere we'll go, We'll

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 2>hang on. You know, twenty million dollars for fifty hours.

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Do the maths? What's that four hundred thousand an hour?

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I've probably got that completely wrong. On

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 2>the top of the head.

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm not a mathematic.

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Clearly I'm not either. But they're saying, well, that's we

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 2>need better revenue per hour than that. The secret is

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 2>go back to the production company. Okay, for series three,

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 2>we're still only paying twenty million, but we want sixty

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 2>hours next year. And so then they turn their sixty

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 2>minute shows into ninety minute shows. They do this, they'd

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 2>look for specials, they look for whatever they can do

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 2>to milk more content, and stuff that should have gone

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 2>to the cutting room floor ends up on television. And

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 2>that causes two problems. One, it's boring, and every editor

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 2>and producers instinct was that's not gonna make it. But

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 2>we've got to get it up to ninety minutes this week,

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 2>so that's in. And then the solution to this is

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 2>really boring. Okay, let's promo the crap out of it

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 2>and make it out to be how many times have

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 2>you listened to network promos going unbelievable, never before seen events,

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 2>You will not believe what happens on blah blah blah,

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 2>and the audience goes, oh, well, this is good, but

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 2>actually you've promoted the crap out of the dull bit

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 2>because you're trying to justify its existence in the show

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 2>the network. The audience watches that and goes, ah, that's

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:32.439
<v Speaker 2>not so interesting. What's on the other channel? Flick flick flick,

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 2>And the minute they're flicking, they're gone, and that's and it's.

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Hard to get them back.

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 2>The other factor, maybe maybe not so much something like

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 2>Holy Moly, but certainly the reality shows is that there's

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 2>no way they can be flexible and respond to the

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 2>audience from w wick like the original Big Brother could

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 2>because the audience was telling you every night what was happening,

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 2>and you could adjust your edits, your content, whatever. But

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 2>now the obsession with these reality shows is overproducing. They've

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 2>got to be graded so they look like they've been

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 2>shot by Bruce Beresford, and that doesn't happen overnight, So

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 2>those things sit in the edit room being worked and worked.

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 2>And then the other problem is if Billy Bloggs says,

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 2>I think Rachel's a pain in the ass, we need

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 2>now and go and find a shot of two other

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 2>people turning their heads sharply not to what he said.

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 2>It could have been a week ago, but we need

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 2>a reaction. So now we have got to overcut, an overcut,

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 2>an overcut, and everything is changed in the edit. So

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 2>these shows are shot six nine months in advance, and

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 2>they spend so long in the edit suite to meet

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 2>the network's expectations of the look, the grading, and it's

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 2>got to be everything's got to have reaction. Everything's going

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 2>to so there's no way you can reshoot something. Course

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 2>it finished six months ago, that everyone's gone home or

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 2>everyone's gone off to do other things. So it's all

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 2>in the in the edit suite, and that's taking away

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 2>the flexibility. So shows can't respond they live or die

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 2>or what they did, and so then they're going to

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 2>go over the top just in case.

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you know, and it's interesting that you

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>say that, because what would you pick? Would you pick

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>something that is absolutely cut and shot to be amazing

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>or a human moment.

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah. And it also adds to the problem that

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 2>the audience just starts to feel like we've seen this before.

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 2>It was another series, it might have been another subject

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 2>and another network, but it all seems familiar. So and

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 2>so does this, so and so does that, and then

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 2>the retrospective interview. The greatest crime against TV making in

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 2>the business, and we started it on you know, when

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 2>we took a one hour show out of America and

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 2>turned it into a strip called The Biggest Loser. And

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I've never forgotten the day we were in the edit

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 2>suite and Paul Franklin was the supervising executive producer of

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 2>the show. We were looking at the first cuts and

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 2>it was a way in and a person was talking

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 2>about it, and someone had recorded it in a sort

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 2>of present tense, and Paul had intercut that with the

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 2>way in, and it was like the people being weighed

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 2>in were almost narrating their own way in, Like there

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 2>were sports announcers calling their own way in. And instead

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 2>of saying I didn't know what to think when that happened,

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 2>it became walking up to the days and I don't

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 2>know what to think, what's going to happen Now this

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 2>is recorded afterwards, we know he knew that person knows

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 2>what happened. But and so that became a staple of

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 2>all of these shows. Instead of letting the events happen,

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 2>now they've got to intercap them all with retrospective interviews

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:10.959
<v Speaker 2>as o people. And not many people can do a

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 2>retrospective interview very well, let alone say it. So they

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 2>become quite fake. And now it's the dance. The audience

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.959
<v Speaker 2>has seen this dance for fifteen years. Let's move on.

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Bob and I decided it was your best to split

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 2>the group in two. Okay, Shannon, you take the guys,

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 2>I'll take the girls.

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 3>They listen out train I thought, oh well, I'm a

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 3>bit on easy.

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Stay that attitude tooll be the first one to go on.

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, let's maybe try telling a story differently. You know,

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe we don't open the reality show with two big

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 2>doors at the end of a kitchen or a lego studio.

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 2>What have two big doors opening and people running in excitedly.

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 2>So you know, we have these producers, because they're being

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 2>told not to mess with success, they make the same

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 2>show every time, might be a different name, might be

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 2>a different network, different subject matter, but it feels like

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm watching the same show all the time.

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>You Know what's really fascinating for me was I was

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>watching what documentaries are doing at the moment, and I

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.719
<v Speaker 1>watched this documentary Don't Fuck with Cats, which evolved so

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>quickly because and it was fascinating. Were they retelling something

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that had happened twenty years ago? Probably, but what they

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:24.360
<v Speaker 1>were doing was giving the audience what happens in real

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>time with real technology as we were the investigators. Yea,

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that is fascinating. You think about what you did in

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand to two thousand and three, particularly revolutionized reality television,

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 1>and yet I think people have now photocopied your ideas,

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>not just yours. I know you collaborated, but then they

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't taken it to the modern day to watch these

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 1>sows evolve in real time. And I think technology, you know,

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>they're still making Big Brother and they haven't given them phones.

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, they haven't given them technology or real life

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>situations that brings the audience and the contestants into a

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>modern day.

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 4>Is that a.

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Mistake, Well, yes, although I don't think that would help

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 2>that approach. I think the isolation, and that's true to

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.959
<v Speaker 2>the format. But the problem for Big Brother is that

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 2>what I was talking about earlier, that need to grade

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 2>the stuff so it looks beautiful on air, that need

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 2>to find every little reaction and inter cut It is

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 2>really hard. Out of twenty four hours. I don't care

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 2>how long it takes, find me a shot of him

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 2>looking sideways suddenly, because I want it to make it

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 2>look like he's reacted to what she just said. You

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 2>can't do that in an overnight turnaround show like Big Brother.

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 2>So what they've done, as you know, is they're just

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 2>making Survivor in a house. Now. It's shot in advance,

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 2>it's not live. It's cut to buggery. The audience doesn't

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 2>have a say. The network that producers are in complete control.

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 2>And the joy of Big Bra there was we weren't

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 2>in control. Big Brother wasn't in control. Those housemates were

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 2>in control, and that's what made the show work because

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 2>you didn't know what was going to happen. You just

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 2>knew it was going to happen, and that was why

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 2>it worked, and that's why the audience is like Big Brother,

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 2>I've seen this before. I think it was on an island. Yeah,

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 2>and they're in swimmers with coconuts. But I think I've

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 2>seen this before, and that's the problem. Making programs for

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 2>the network and for the producers instead of for the

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 2>audience is the slippery slope downhill.

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 4>I think you.

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Flipped the switch a couple of times in your career, though,

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 1>like I thought, Sex with Sophie Lee was really a

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>fascinating moment because it was groundbreaking television. It was content

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that we hadn't seen. It was stuff that people felt

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it kind of like, I need to watch that by myself.

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>But the topics that you were discussing in there, which

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>would have been HIV and things like that, or people's

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>sexuality and gender. You were doing that show in the nineties,

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's still possible, I think, And I wondered

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 1>whether you think to find those things that people truly

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>want to know and the answers to you know, do

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>those shows kind would they work now?

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Well? A lot has been said and written about this

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 2>because the magazine shows, particularly the Australian style magazine shows

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 2>of the late eighties early nineties, were incredibly unique. We

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 2>were doing them in primetime if the world was burying

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 2>them in off air afternoons or on the weekends. We

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 2>were leading the way in terms of ratings. I mean,

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 2>I've never forgotten that first year of Money because when

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 2>I finished two years of seasons of Sex, the next

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 2>show that I pitched was Money and it went to

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 2>where in ninety three from memory And in that first

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 2>year there was only I think we made twenty episodes

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 2>half hour episodes of Money and seven weeks out of

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:04.400
<v Speaker 2>the fifty two weeks of the year, it was the

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 2>most watched nonsport, non news show on Australian television. But

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the story you're about to see tonight has got to

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 2>be one of the most disturbing investment tales ever. You know,

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 2>two point four two point five million people watching every episode. Now,

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 2>that was a time when you didn't have the internet

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 2>to just easily. I mean, yes there was the Internet,

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 2>but it wasn't anywhere near as effective as it is

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 2>now in terms of researching stuff. But we did have

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 2>this this family disintegration where I don't have my mum

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 2>or my dad, or my granddad or anyone to ask,

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 2>so how do I know what to do and how

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 2>to do it? And I remember being asked by a

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 2>journalist when we were launching money. I was asked, you,

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 2>you've gone from doing sex now to doing money. They're

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 2>so different, really, I said, no, they're identical because they're

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 2>both subjects that people feel they should know lots about.

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 2>They don't know lots about, but they're embarrassed about revealing

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 2>their lack of knowledge. So people won't ask someone else about, Hey, look,

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 2>my husband wants me to do this in the bedroom.

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that's normal. They won't ask their friend that,

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 2>and they won't ask their bank manager for a better

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 2>interest rate.

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I fucking at my house loan.

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know. They won't demand stuff in the bedroom,

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 2>and they won't demand stuff in the bank manager's office.

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Or they use car salesfe because they don't feel they

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 2>have the knowledge or the right to do it. So

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 2>any show that came along and gave them a little

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.360
<v Speaker 2>bit of knowledge and our phrase was enough to bluff.

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 2>If you could bluff your way through a session in

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 2>the bedroom, you could bluff your way through a meeting

0:23:55.680 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 2>with the bank manager. Then it was valuable information and

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 2>the audience lapped it up because we were giving them

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 2>what they really really wanted and needed.

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 1>Interesting though that, you know, we talk about the Internet

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>being that space that we can go to now to

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>not feel so stupid, so we can gather that information.

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Are there programs that we should be still having on

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>television like that though? There are there cornerstones that we

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>can touch upon, or are there taboo subjects that can

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>be told in real time that you think would be

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>palatable on free to air? Yeah?

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Ironically, I was talking about this with a friend not

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 2>long ago, that the Internet and the availability information killed

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 2>the magazine shows and so they morphed into so called

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 2>factual based soap operas like The Block. You're not going

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 2>to learn a thing about renovating watching The Block. It's

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 2>all in the follow up on the go to the

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 2>website you can find that. But it's a soap opera

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 2>with renovation at its core, and that's how they get

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 2>an audience in. But those shows that sort of disappeared

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 2>in information based shows that disappeared because of the Internet

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 2>are probably just as important because now there is so

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 2>much crap on the Internet that you'll get twenty five

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 2>different opinions about what you should do with your bank,

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 2>and so a Paul Clithoro coming along and telling you

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 2>this is how you get a better deal in the

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 2>bank manager's office probably is relevant now no network would

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:23.719
<v Speaker 2>buy it. Then.

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting though that you say that, because I think

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>about anytime I have something wrong with me, I would

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>go to the internet. Maybe ten years ago I could

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 1>probably diagnose myself on doctor Google, but these days you're

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right.

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 4>It's a conundrum. You know, it's too much.

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Information and it's not the right information and you end

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>up going away from it and being like, oh, you know,

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 1>looking back though over your career, you know you've worked

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>with so many people who have been facilitators have changed

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 1>when it's come to making content. Who are some of

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the people that you've really collaborated with and it's clicked like,

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:57.679
<v Speaker 1>I know there's people like David Mott who you mentioned before,

0:25:57.760 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and Stephen Tank.

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 4>There's lots of people. Is there is there a.

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Person in your mind that you go, Wow, that was

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a synergy between two people and we made good TV.

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Well you mentioned David Mott, Yes, that time of Network

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 2>ten in the early two thousands. I came back from

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 2>working in Britain in two thousand and one and I

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 2>got a three month gig at ten to talk about

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 2>what was happening overseas in television and foreign programming trends,

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 2>and it just happened to be at a time when

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 2>they were looking at their business and saying what do

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 2>we need to do? They were number three sixteen thirty

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 2>nine and they were number three total people, and David

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Mott was excited, enthusiastic. He's unique when he was in

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 2>the programming business because he just loves the business and

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 2>it runs in his veins. You know, He's been in

0:26:57.400 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 2>the TV business since he left school, has never been

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 2>out out of it, and he the idea of being

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.719
<v Speaker 2>a program at him was just like this, this is

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 2>the best job in the world. I'm making television and

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 2>people were watching it. And so the coincidence of him

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:16.679
<v Speaker 2>being programmer there, John Mcallipine and the CEO of ten

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 2>decided to get aggressive and chase an audience. Wanted us

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 2>to identify what that audience it was and the emergence

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 2>of fascinating new programming approaches overseas, and so I got

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 2>to know David and eventually stayed there and became a

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 2>head of factual for him. And one of the first

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 2>things we talked about was Big Brother, and at the

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 2>time Big Brother was doing well in Britain and obviously

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:52.679
<v Speaker 2>had already done well in Europe, and nine and seven

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 2>the networks were chasing it hard. They were sending people

0:27:55.840 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 2>overseas and everything like that, and ten came to the

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 2>party quite late, but came with such enthusiasm. This we

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:11.400
<v Speaker 2>saw Big Brother as that pivotal show that could change

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 2>everything for ten, because seven and nine were talking to

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 2>End of Mill overseas about it being a show that

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 2>was going to run nine point thirty at night, maybe

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 2>a couple of times a week, and they were looking

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 2>at it almost with game show producers, whereas we went

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.159
<v Speaker 2>hard and I've never forgotten that the meeting with the

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 2>End of More people in Hilversum in their office in Hilveson,

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 2>this one guy comes in and he was a fairly

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 2>lowly ranked character and he said, I'm not sure why

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 2>you're here. Seven and nine have been talking to us

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 2>for six months and.

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 4>You're late.

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 2>You're late, you haven't shown any interest in the show.

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Why should we be talking to you. It's rude. The

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:06.479
<v Speaker 2>others are clearly ahead of you. And I said, look,

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 2>I know what they're pitching to you. We are the

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 2>complete opposite. We make one of the world's most popular

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 2>scripted soap operas. It's called Neighbors. We run it at

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 2>six thirty at night till seven. And he said, yes,

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 2>I know, Neighbors. I said, we want to run the

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 2>world's most popular non scripted soap opera straight after it

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 2>at seven o'clock at night, five nights a week, with

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 2>a Sunday night eviction, because we think Big Brother can

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 2>be a family show. We don't think it's a late

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 2>night slee show. We think it's compelling soap opera and

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 2>it will work with us because we have a young

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 2>audience that are ready for this show. Seven to nine,

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 2>and you have to be lie in these things. Seven

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 2>nine have old audiences. They won't get this show and

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 2>they'll just run it late at night. And he just

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 2>looked at me, and I've never forgotten. He said, you

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 2>stay here, and he went out, and about seven people

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 2>in suits came in. We had to move to another room.

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 2>And it turned out that they had been aching for

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 2>someone to see this as not a late night show,

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 2>that this was exactly what they're talking about. What I

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 2>was saying is what they envisaged, envisaged Big Brother being

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 2>a daily soap opera, and it was almost almost impossible

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 2>not to win the bid then, even though we'd come

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 2>in late, because we saw the show the way they

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 2>saw the show, and that's the show we made. Yeah,

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 2>it moved on after that first series, but it was

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 2>a daytime sud and that neighbor's audience stayed straight through

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 2>to Big Brother, and it brought other people, and so

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 2>there are lots of other things we did that made

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 2>it successful, but understanding the audience and what the audience

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 2>was craving was key to it. And that was a

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 2>new time in television, was that younger audience wanted something

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 2>that was theirs to a Big Brother became theirs to

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 2>one because it was on the right network at the

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 2>right time and in the right country and everything just

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 2>it all came perfect storm for that show, There's no

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 2>doubt about it.

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>And then, interestingly enough, it's now been on nine, it's

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>been on seven, and they've all had a turn, you know,

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like, you know, different takes of that format.

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately, I think it never will go back to

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the purest form of that show. And it can't go

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>back to the purest form of that show, and that's

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>because the show became quite controversial in certain ways. I

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>mean the turkey slap, that is one of the things

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that people talk about when they think about Channel ten's

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>big brother. But also I thought the Merlin eviction was

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>so interesting to watch as well, because that was another

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for people to see something happening in real time

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that no one had control over, and it felt so

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>real and you just think, how did that something like

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that happen? I mean, did Channel ten in any way

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>do you think know that Merlin was going to do that?

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh God no, no. In hindsight, we wouldn't have stopped

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 2>it if we'd known it, But we would have had

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 2>we known. And it was very it was brilliant. They

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 2>all had their suitcases had to be inspected and people

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 2>were looking for you know, drugs or alcohol or physical

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 2>signs or something that they might No one opened all

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 2>of their t shirts and folded them out to see

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 2>if anything was stuck in there. And he sat on

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:38.719
<v Speaker 2>that all that time, And I mean, again, that's the

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 2>joy of a show like that. You didn't know what

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 2>was coming, but something was coming, something was always coming,

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 2>and you put that environment and you put a host

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 2>like Gretel Colleen super intelligent quick on her feet, and

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 2>you just ran with it.

0:32:57.520 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 4>We had a slide hiccup.

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 1>And then Merlin came out of the house.

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 3>As he was walking down the ramp towards the eviction stage,

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 3>he took some black masking tape no War and put

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 3>it over his mouth and held up a sign that

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 3>said free the refugees, which is completely and ugly valid.

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>It's still one of my favorite moments to rewatch. I

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 1>go back and watch it on YouTube to watch it

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:24.719
<v Speaker 1>all happen. And Gretel is so on brand on this show,

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>like as in watching her think on her feet is amazing.

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you think in some ways though, that she got

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too close to big Brother? There seemed

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to have been a point where she either had enough

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>or the maybe producers had enough of working with her.

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>But essentially there was definitely a point where she walked away.

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Well because you pointed out that the show could never

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 2>be what it was in that first year, maybe the

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 2>second year, and it became more of a program where

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 2>to some extent, you were turning a sausage machine wheel.

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Every show does no matter what newsrooms, turn the sausage

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 2>machine wheel. If there's no big news happening, and what

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 2>excited Gretel about the show was the unpredictability, the intelligence

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 2>of the setup. What was possible watching these people unravel

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 2>and then rebuild themselves all live on television in front

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 2>of the nation in isolation. She I think it's sort

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.879
<v Speaker 2>of like got too boring. She wouldn't use the word,

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 2>but it certainly wasn't the amazing experience of those first

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 2>couple of years. And I would say that we were

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 2>lucky to have Gretel for so many years, for as

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 2>long as we did, because it didn't challenge her like

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 2>it did in those first few years. It didn't challenge

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 2>anyone to that same extent because you were making it

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:50.359
<v Speaker 2>up as you went.

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I think COVID would have been really an interesting thing

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to see reality shows done live, because I think we

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 1>would have been able to see on television people reacting

0:34:58.080 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>the way that we did. And then there was so

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>much shows being produced at the time that COVID hit Australia,

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and all of those reality shows were pre recorded, so

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we never got to see a real human moment, We

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>never got to interact with something that unfolded as it

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>unfolded for us, So that how we felt could be

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:17.280
<v Speaker 1>seen by other people on television discussing how they felt.

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's an element of television that's truly missing.

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh and that was one of the great advantages of

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Big Brother, that total isolation. Because if they'd gone in

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 2>there when no one knew about it and came out

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:33.840
<v Speaker 2>three months later with the world lockdown, no one allowed

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 2>out of their houses in parts of the world, that

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 2>would have been gold. That alone would have been worth

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:42.359
<v Speaker 2>doing the series again in the old way.

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about now that you've worked on

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 1>all of these shows that are getting rebooted essentially like

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you look at it now, like Celebrity Apprentices to being shot?

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that they have a place on TV?

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>And if they do have a place on TV, what

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 1>is it that you would do differently?

0:35:56.360 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm really torn by this. Instead of doing any

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 2>let's just rehash the old stuff that worked. It work.

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 2>They need to work now. And that's why you're looking

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 2>at audiences are five hundred thousand, not you know, one million?

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, And it is part of that fear that

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 2>networks feel of we're a diminishing business. How do we

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 2>keep the money coming in the doors at least till

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 2>we get to retirement and then someone else's problem. I

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:26.320
<v Speaker 2>think there are shows that are worth doing again.

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Is Celebrity Apprentice one of them?

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't think so. The audience I think is

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 2>over the celebrity thing because we've seen them eat worms

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 2>in South Africa, We've seen them run around the streets

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 2>in Celebrity Apprentice. We know that if you get the

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 2>right celebrities, there's nothing they won't do. And if you

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 2>get the celebrities the network wants you to get because

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 2>it makes a good promo, they won't do anything. You know,

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 2>they won't get their hands dirty. So I think the

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 2>audience is with.

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 1>That finishing the podcast. I always ask for, like a

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 1>funny story or something you dust off to tell your

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:08.840
<v Speaker 1>friends over dinner conversation. Is there something that would surprise

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>people from back in the day, maybe working on that

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:12.319
<v Speaker 1>show Sex with.

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Sophie Lee, incredibly intelligent individual, like so intelligent it's frightening.

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 2>I remember going to see her once in her dressing

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 2>room in Melbourne and I walked in and she was

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 2>sitting there in a dressing gown, waiting for makeup or something,

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 2>reading the Asian Wall Street Journal, and I said what

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 2>are you reading. I'm just reading what's going on in

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 2>business in pasi Ah. And you know that the ability

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 2>to work with someone like that's so smart, such a

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 2>good communicator, so aware of the medium and what it

0:37:56.680 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 2>could do, and then and also so passionate about the

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:02.439
<v Speaker 2>subject matter. It was great to work with someone like that.

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:09.319
<v Speaker 2>And I wonder where those sorts of hosts are A

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 2>host like that, like Sophie. Yes they're intelligent, and yes

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 2>they're going to question what you're asking them to do,

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:21.400
<v Speaker 2>and so they should. But that's hard. It'd be very

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 2>easy to get someone who'll just agree to do whatever

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 2>you tell them to do, but that's, you know, the

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 2>downhill path.

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's an absolutely a pleasure to have sat here

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and talked to you. I think you have still so

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 1>many stories to tell, and I think you've got a

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 1>lot to educate people, because I think you've got a

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 1>lot to teach people. So thank you for taking the

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.360
<v Speaker 1>time today with me. And I think that other people

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 1>out there that will be listening to this will have

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>appreciated as well.

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 2>Soasu're talking to you