WEBVTT - Is Zuckerberg dumping the news?

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Life on Cut acknowledges the traditional custodians of country whose

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>lands were never seated. We pay our respects to their

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>elders past and present.

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:11.399
<v Speaker 2>Always was, always will be Aboriginal Land. This episode was

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 2>recorded on de rug Wallamata Land.

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Hi guys, and welcome back to another episode of Life

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 3>on Cut. I'm Laura and Brittany.

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 4>Things are like very chaotic here in the studio today,

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 4>hy Laura, because never before have both of us decided

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 4>to bring our animals.

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 3>And on the same day you copied me.

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I had to bring Delilah today because she has to

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 1>go to an appointment. So I was like, I need

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to bring it to go and then so Laura's like, well,

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>then I want to bring Buster.

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 3>And now there's two dogs here. One dog was fine,

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 3>but two dogs.

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>They're just looking at each other from across the room.

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Want him to like rumble.

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Buster wants to hump Delilah to be okay, to be fair.

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 4>Delilah's good looking, she's a pretty dog. You can't blame

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 4>the guy. No, he normally Buster. And I'm sorry to

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 4>say this, Honey. I know you can hear me right now,

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 4>and I don't want you to feel shamed. But Buster

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 4>is a humper, which is very very very funny to

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 4>see because he only got everything.

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 2>He's only got three legs. So he tries to mount

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 2>things and he slips off the side. But he doesn't

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 2>try and hump Delilah, So she should be offend. Maybe

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 2>he knows Delilah's out of his leave.

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 3>No, he did try. Remember they've gone to a fight once.

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>He tried it on a once and she snapped at

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>him and he was like, yep, I'll read the roof.

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 4>And he's like, all right, my advances are not wanted.

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:29.839
<v Speaker 4>He good, you should respect women more. He's literally passed

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 4>now I know he's so old. Now, okay, you were

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 4>bringing Delilah into the studio, and I didn't want Bust

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 4>to be at home knowing that he was the one

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 4>that just got left behind. Could you imagine what that

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 4>would do to his side? He doesn't know, he does

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't. No, he does not know that Delilah. Okay,

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 4>that's enough. Anyway, we're here now, we have dogs in

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 4>the studio. It's all happening today. I can I say no,

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 4>don't don't.

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Say it, don't keep it to yourself, don't be offendant. Girls,

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:54.919
<v Speaker 3>what happened Produca and Laura.

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I got so many messages saying the best part about

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the episode the other day was Delilah's mum chat so

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>just saying they were like, we're pro. They were like,

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>we're pro Delilah's momth you know how I was like

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the difference between us you guys were to rape.

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 3>I was looking at p of Dla's mom. Everyone's like,

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm your team. I would have been at home looking

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 3>at Dalilah's mouth. I love he would you say?

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 4>I got so many actually four five, maybe I didn't care.

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 3>I lost count after three I had after no, there

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 3>was so many.

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 4>I couldn't even make my way through all of the

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 4>messages around Delilah's albino mon chat.

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I had RSI and my thumb from scrolling the messages.

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:35.839
<v Speaker 2>Well, we did speak about this on Thursday, or maybe

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 2>it was Tuesday, I can't remember, but we spoke about

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 2>a woman who had texted an eyebrow beautician to say

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.239
<v Speaker 2>and to ask the eyebra beautician to go out of

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 2>her way to give her friend the worst eyebrows that

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 2>she could ever possibly imagine.

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>She literally texted the beautitian and was like, yo, this

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>is my girlfriend fuck her up.

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And the reason why she did that is because

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 2>she found out that her friend was sleeping with her boyfriend,

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 2>which you know, drama, drama, drama. The beautician didn't do it,

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 2>but the post is going viral across social media. So

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:03.959
<v Speaker 2>we gave you guys the call out because we wanted

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 2>to know what is the most heinous revenge plot twist

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 2>that you have ever enacted on an X?

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 4>What did you do to get back to them? And

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 4>at the start, oh, look, at the start, they.

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Were pretty pg.

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 4>They were pretty pretty safe, I would have said, But

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 4>then we did another call out and holy dick, you

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 4>came to the party.

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I would like to start this conversation by saying, we

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>no way encouraged this sort of behavior. About to laugh

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>at it, but we are not telling anybody to take

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>this and go and do anything with it.

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 3>We may want to know endorsing it.

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 4>But also some of this stuff is probably like borderline illegal,

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 4>So we are.

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Laura, are you broke into your ex's house and stole

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the past one and forty signature?

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 3>That's illegal? Not borderline illegal?

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 2>I agree, but it was ten years ago, and come.

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>And the statue of libertation says that ten years, you

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>can do whatever you want.

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all right, so I'm gonna kick it off.

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 2>I went into his apartment after I found out that

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 2>he had been cheating on me for six months. I

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 2>drenched his carpet and then I covered it in grass mix.

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 2>He was away on a work trip for three and

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 2>a half weeks, so I turned that central heating up

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 2>to thirty degrees.

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 3>And I let the bad boy flourish.

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Imagine seeding the lounge room carpet of an apartment.

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Wouldn't you get off on that.

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 4>I would come home and I'd.

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Like more room to propagate.

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 4>Chokes on you my indoor garden. Finally living out all

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 4>my best dreams. Okay, I've got one.

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>I went to the pet store and bought frozen rats

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 1>and put them in his car.

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 3>That was my favorite. There was more context to this.

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 4>He was away, discussed it away for a long time

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 4>as well.

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 3>This is what I'm learning from these.

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 2>If you're ever going to enact to revenge, you've got

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 2>to do it when they've gone away on a work trip,

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 2>and you can really let that sort of stuff just

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 2>simmer in the sun or the heat. Okay, I drove

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 2>his car to the edge of our property, and I

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 2>covered it in shit, like literal cow manure from top

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 2>to bottom.

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 3>You get your car.

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>That's not the worst for me. You get your cars

0:04:57.760 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>shit on my birds and stuff all the time.

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 4>She hovered it in like a thick layer of manure

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 4>that you would put in the garden.

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Do something that's not gonna gross you out too. You've

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>got to put your hands in manure and like massage

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you into someone's car.

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they live on a farm. Okay, this one is great.

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 2>This one I thought was brilliant, especially coming from the

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 2>plant person. So this woman, her boyfriend had a beautifully

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 2>manicured front garden, like he was really into his landscaping.

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 2>He'd only recently had the landscaping in the front of

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 2>the house finished. And she went to the pet store

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 2>and she bought you know when you go and you

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 2>get like the little pebbles for a fish tank. She

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 2>bought like brightly colored kilograms of the brightly colored little

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 2>tiny pebbles that you put at the bottom of a

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 2>fish tank, and she scattered it all throughout his car.

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 3>What the pink like pink and purple and green.

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 4>You would never ever ever be able to get that, like,

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 4>hand picked that out of your fucking garden. I came

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 4>finding it for years. I got this, I got this

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 4>garden one come in. My ex loved to garden. It

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 4>was his pride and joy.

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>So after we broke up because he cheated on me,

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I went to his house dug some of his great

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>plants out so that I could take them home myself

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and poison and the rest.

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 3>That's really me. I felt bad because they were beautiful,

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 3>but fuck you, it's really.

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 2>I unpicked at the buttons on his work shirt just

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 2>enough so that they would pop off while he was

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 2>wearing them. But she did it to every single one

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 2>of his button up shirts. Got holes in the crutch

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 2>of all his suits. My husband was so lazy.

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 3>I know there is no way he would have noticed

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 3>before putting them. On the day.

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 4>Of a Noveda wedder, I threw my ex's rolex in

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 4>the yarraw.

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 3>That's illegal, but also that's also brutal fair.

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 2>I put hair remover a cream in his shampoo and

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 2>then look, it goes a bit further than that. She

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 2>put hair remove a cream in his shampoo and then

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 2>she urinated in his mouth wash, which I am not condoning.

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 3>That's too far.

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>That's you're in a stair ale though. No mouthwash, yes,

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>so imagine if they're both together. You had to clean

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>his mouth in history. That's that is so illegal, covered

0:06:54.560 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>his car in glitter and lube.

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 3>A that's really funny.

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 4>I opened a can of tuna and I hit it

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 4>under his bed.

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Right, you know what I was thinking when I was

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>reading these because I'm not a revenger, right Like, we

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>know that my ex had a double life, and all

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I did was take his toilet.

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Pap, you need to be more spiteful.

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, I don't hope. I don't have to ever be

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 4>spiteful again. Friends an angel.

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>But what I was thinking I would do is, and

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I took this idea from all of you guys, instead

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of just putting something in the cur like fish in

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the curtains or tuna under the bed, I would take

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the sheets off the bed and then cut on the

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>underside of the mattress. Cut in a hole, put all

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of whatever you want in there, because no one is

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>ever going to look for a hole in the mattress.

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So all of the dead animals or the food goes

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>into the mattress.

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 3>If you wanted to.

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>You could sew that scene back up, put the sheets

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>back on, and there's no way in hell that they

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>are ever finding that.

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 3>That is the most revolting thing I have ever heard.

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 2>But really, no, you would realize pretty quickly that the

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 2>stench was coming from your match, but you'd be.

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Looking under it.

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 3>You wouldn't. It's son up. But it's like, I'm essentially six.

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 3>That is so fucking rank.

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 4>Imagine someone getting frozen rats and putting them inside your mattress. Okay,

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 4>there's so many guys, There was so, so, so many

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 4>of these. The most common one, which we're also not endorsing,

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 4>was that you went and had sex with someone who

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 4>they cared about, like their brother or their best friend,

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 4>or their cousin or someone in their immediate family who.

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 3>You thought this is really going to hurt them.

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Also, I poked a hole in his goggles so that

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 2>they would just leak a tiny little bit when he

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 2>was swimming, which he did daily.

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 3>That's an annoying one.

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Reported him to the government for tax fraud and added

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 2>him to a monthly Bible.

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Subscription, which he now received in the That's all right,

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Maybe he needed to find God.

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 4>He needed to repent for his sins. Motherful, Okay, this

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 4>one's actually dangerous. Poured olive oil on the windscreen. You

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 4>can't do anything that's going to kill someone.

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Is it dangerous?

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Though?

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Would he realize as soon as he got in the

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:54.839
<v Speaker 2>car that he couldn't if it's oily.

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's distorting your vision, Like, I'm getting really serious,

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>so you can't do that. The Bible thing's one thing,

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>all right? I mean we really ended on down, it,

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't you, broo.

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to talk about something today that is a

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 2>little bit different to your standard life un cut content,

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 2>which really does bounce around with a whole lot of

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 2>different stuff. You guys might have seen that there are

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of conversations happening online at the moment which

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.559
<v Speaker 2>is spearheaded by independent and by the major news groups

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 2>around Meta, which is if you are not familiar with Meta,

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure you are. It's Facebook and Instagram. The parent

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 2>company of Facebook and Instagram, Mark Zuckerberg basically is changing

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 2>the way in which Facebook is going to distribute news.

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 3>On their platforms.

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 2>You might remember back in twenty twenty one, there was

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 2>this like a couple of days when news was taken

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 2>off Instagram and off Facebook and everybody was up in arms.

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 2>It was like a news blackout, absolutely, and the reason

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 2>for that was because at the time Meta and the

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Government were at lockerheads around who should be paying for

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 2>news and how was news in Australia going to be

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 2>distributed on social media platforms. Now, the agreement that they

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 2>broke it in twenty twenty one expires in April this year,

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 2>and that agreement was called the Government News Media Bargaining Code,

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 2>which basically meant that news outlets, the big major news

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:18.599
<v Speaker 2>outlets I'm talking like Fairfax and seven, it allowed them

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 2>to negotiate with Meta to receive a payment for the

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 2>news and the content that they put onto Meta's networks.

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 2>So basically, if they were going to provide content and

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 2>they're going to post, and they're going to be driving

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 2>people towards news and sharing the news, what it meant

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 2>is that the responsibility of payment laid with Meta. And

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 2>so every year Meta pays an absolute fuck load to

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Australian news outlets. I think it accounts for up to

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 2>ten percent of their overall income that they're receiving.

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 3>This is not a new thing.

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Basically, what's happened is that Meta has turned around and said,

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 2>as of April.

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 3>We're binning the whole thing.

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 2>We are no longer going to be paying for news

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 2>to be supported on our sites. So ultimately what is

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 2>going to happen is that they're removing the news tab,

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 2>so you'll no longer be able to go on Facebook

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 2>and have a news tab there where you can see

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:08.959
<v Speaker 2>what's current in the world. And also they're going to

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 2>limit any of the news platforms. So I'm talking you know,

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 2>if you go on and you look at ABC News,

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 2>or you look at Sky News, or you look at

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 2>dot com some of the independent ones as well, like

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 2>the Daily Os, who have been very vocal in this space,

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 2>you will no longer be able to see the content.

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 3>And so currently this.

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Band already exists in the UK, it exists in Germany,

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 2>in France and in Canada. They rolled this out earlier

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 2>this year, and so if you go on to any

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 2>news site in those places, it currently says news in

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 2>this area cannot be accessed because it is banned on

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 2>this network. So if you try and this is interesting

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 2>because the Daily Oz did an episode on it, if

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:46.719
<v Speaker 2>you're in Canada at the moment and you try and

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Instagram search, the daily os. You cannot see the profile

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 2>page and you cannot see the content that it has.

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I think the interesting thing is here the

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>reason Facebook's giving for saying, Hey, we're going to withdraw

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>OWND news. This is the official quote that Meta put out.

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>They've decided that the cost of providing news in Australia

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>is too high. It's reason for the change is to

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>better align our investments to our products and services people

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>value the most. The interesting thing here is the statistic

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that Meta put out saying that in the last year,

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>news clicks in Australia have declined by eighty percent, which

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:22.559
<v Speaker 1>is a huge amount. They're saying there's something like only

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>three percent of engagement with news sites now. But how

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 1>are we supposed to know that that is even a

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>valid statistic? This is just purely coming from Meta Medican

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>tellus whatever the fuck they want.

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, I found this so deeply fascinating, And the reason

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 2>for that is because partly when I read all about this,

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 2>and I do not think that Facebook are the good guys.

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 2>Let me tell you that first, I do not think

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:47.839
<v Speaker 2>that Meta other good guys in this, but I also

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 2>understand why they're at a point now where they're like,

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 2>we no longer want the news on our platform. So

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 2>basically they've said that three percent of the content is

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 2>what constitutes news and what people are engaged with when

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 2>it comes to news on their platform. And I know

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 2>that there's no way for us to know the truth

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 2>behind that and as to whether that is fact or not.

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 2>But the reality is why would they have Facebook. Their

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 2>number one thing they want is for people to spend

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 2>more time on their platform. So if news was making

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 2>up a hugely critical volume of people's interests, they wouldn't

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 2>be removing it, they would be keeping it. So they

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 2>have obviously done a cost analysis of well how much

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 2>does it cost us to have the news? How much

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 2>are we outlaying in order to have this content and

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 2>for people to engage with it, and is it valuable

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 2>to us?

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 3>And do we need it?

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 2>And they've come to the decision as a business, well no,

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 2>we don't need it, and the news outlets need us

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 2>a fuckload more than we need them. And that's where

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 2>this kind of like dynamic has been created. And the

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.319
<v Speaker 2>thing that I think is the biggest flaw with the

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Australian Government's news media bargaining agreement that they came to

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty one is that it doesn't benefit all

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 2>news outlets. So independent news outlets like The Conversation, like

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.559
<v Speaker 2>The Daily because, for example, they don't actually get a

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 2>kickback from Meta and arguably they are some of the

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 2>very creative news outlets who are putting out the most

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 2>unbiased and factchecked news news that as well, I think

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:13.559
<v Speaker 2>is the most engaging on their platforms. The Daily Oz

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 2>has grown, it like, absolutely exploded in the last three

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 2>years since covid.

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, they have half a million followers on Instagram alone.

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and when we interviewed Sam a few years back,

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 2>there were only on like one hundred and fifty thousand.

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 2>So the thing with the Daily Oz is that they

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 2>created a platform where it took news to the place

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 2>where people engage with it.

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 3>That's on social media.

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 2>But the reason why I guess the whole thing is

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of like a bit of a problem and why

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of moved so far away from it being

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 2>a news aggregator is that on one hand, you have

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 2>news batlets who have profiles on Instagram, and in order

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 2>to get people to engage with their content further, what

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 2>they do and It's what we've all seen is instead

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 2>of having a news article sitting and living on Instagram,

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 2>they just have a really click baity headline, something that

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 2>as you're scrolling you see it and you're like, oh fuck,

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 2>what's that and then you have to click the link

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 2>in bio in order to go and read the article.

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 2>So what news outlets are actually doing is that they're

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 2>pushing people off the platform onto their own sites to

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 2>engage with their own content, and ultimately, Meta as a

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 2>business doesn't want users leaving their platform. We've discussed this

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 2>so many times. They want people with engaging with their

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 2>content as much as possible for as long as possible.

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>The daily is so if you don't know who they are,

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you'll know the faces of it.

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Zara and Sam they are the founders.

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a bunch of people that have gone into it,

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>but they're the face that's who you'll hear from the most.

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think Zara summarized it really well, So I

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>just want to read exactly what she wrote. She said,

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>without a strong news ecosystem on social media, young Australians

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>will have nowhere to access reliable, fact checked information. We

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>know young people won't actively seek out news elsewhere. All

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the research tells us that, so what will happen? Instead,

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll see a rise in influencer led commentary attracting young

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>people to death. With the editors, fact and journalists that

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>make up modern newsrooms, young people will have unchecked opinions

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in their place. Now, just to sit on that for

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a second, that is something that you don't immediately think about,

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>but that is so worrying. We see so many loud

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>people on social media that are stuffing their opinions that

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>are often incorrect down your throats and unforbiased, biased opinion, biased,

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>sometimes uneducated. Sometimes you know, there's a whole multitude of things,

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>but they're throwing these down your throat. And if you've

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>got nowhere else to access your news, it's very easy

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen it happen. It's very easy to listen

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to what some influencer has said, take that as gospel,

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and you go and spread that news.

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 2>And also what it means is like people are not

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 2>going to pay for subscription newspapers right like most people

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 2>And I would love to just do a poll of

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 2>you guys. The life is like who is paying for

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 2>a subscription based news outlet? Like, are you subscribed to

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 2>the Telegraph? Are you subscribed to I don't know, the

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 2>New York Times. I would love to know how many

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 2>of you actually are paying for news because we live

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 2>in a society where we so deeply just expect things

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 2>for free, and I think people are getting most of

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 2>their bite sized information, whether it is a good thing

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 2>or not, from social media. I guess the big question

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 2>though with in this, you can be angry at Meta

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 2>and you can like stomp and be so like, this

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 2>is an outrage. We should be able to have this,

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, free access to unfettered news, and now it

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 2>means that people are not going to have the ability

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 2>to fact check and it means that news is going

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 2>to be more limited blah blah blah blah blah. But

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 2>is Meta the ones who are responsible for that or

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 2>has the government created a situation where Meta is actually

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 2>funding news organizations within Australia and it's not their responsibility

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 2>to do so. And the reason I say this is

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 2>because there is no one the industry that gets paid

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 2>to put their content on a platform that is free

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 2>that we all use daily, that we all profit from

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 2>in different ways, and whether you profit from it, because

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 2>it allows you to connect to your friendship group, and

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 2>you connect with your friends for no cost or whether

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 2>it's because you And when I say no cost, I

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 2>mean no financial cost, because there is always a cost

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 2>of using Meta. We all pay with our data, we

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 2>all pay in some way. But I think about me

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 2>as a small business. I hugely financially profit from using

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 2>Instagram for Tony May, and in fact I have to

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 2>pay a shitload of money and ads in order to

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.360
<v Speaker 2>be able to get my product to my services out

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 2>there more freely. Now I know that I don't provide

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 2>something that is as critical as the news nowhere near,

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 2>but there are other organizations out there who do. There

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 2>are other people who pay to use Meta and Facebook

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 2>whose product is genuinely life changing and amazing, and yet

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 2>they still have to pay in order to be used

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:38.360
<v Speaker 2>and being on that platform.

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know what, I think it opens up.

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>It opens up another question, and this is a completely

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>different segue, but it opens up the question of of

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.880
<v Speaker 1>course we should be paying for things.

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 3>In all aspects of life.

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Every single person and every single industry is a business

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that needs to make money to survive, So like we

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be expecting people to give us things for free.

0:18:56.320 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>The problem in this situation lies in the fact of

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Meta's worth. Meta makes so much money. In twenty twenty three,

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.199
<v Speaker 1>they made an annual growth profit of one hundred and

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:08.880
<v Speaker 1>eight billion dollars.

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 3>So it's so much.

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, it comes back to the question of Okay, we

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>get it, We get that, like, you shouldn't be putting

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 1>things out for free, but you also make more than

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>any other company, Like you're making one hundred billion dollars

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a year.

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Is it that much to ask that we can have

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 3>news on our platform?

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>And then it comes back to this question of okay,

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>does this responsibility full on in all aspects of life?

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>If somebody makes more money, does that responsibility fall on

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>them to provide things for free? And I think it's

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a question and taking this away to simplify it for

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a second, it's a question that we've done on the

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>podcast before where friends have said one of my friends

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>earned so much more money than me, should they be

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 1>paying more for dinner? You know, it comes back to that,

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>like there are so many different levels.

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 2>I love that you just managed to make a linkage

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 2>between Facebook and better and going out for dinner.

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 3>But I agree, I.

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Agree, I'm just trying to put it on a level

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that we can understand in our in our own life

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>because no one listening to this, I'm a big call.

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>No one listening to this can relate to one hundred

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars, right, we can't. But does it always have

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to fall on the person that's making the most money,

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the most profit to then go and provide something extra

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>for free?

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 2>Because I don't know when you say it like that,

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 2>though part of me thinks if you're a monopoly and

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 2>you have that level of income, then you should be

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 2>contributing back to the creators who keep people engaged on

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:18.880
<v Speaker 2>your platforms. There is a part of me that says

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 2>yes totally. But I guess the reason why I kind

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 2>of think that it's such a unique case when it

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 2>comes to the news is because there are no other

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 2>creators who are given the same sort of benefits, I guess.

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 2>And at the end of the day, the impact that

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 2>we're going to see really is that news within Australia

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 2>is going to suffer because it already suffers. Back in

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 2>the day, people used to pay for newspapers, physical newspapers.

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 2>We used to buy them every week, and now we

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 2>don't invest in the news on a consumer level in

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 2>the way that we used to. So what's going to

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 2>happen is that these big organizations are still going to

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 2>need to make money, so subscriptions are going to increase.

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 2>News is going to become more limited because they need

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 2>to make money. They are also a business. Like that's

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 2>going to have a flow on effect. But also what

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 2>it means is news is going to get more sensationalized

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 2>because the headlines, if that's the thing that's going to

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 2>grab your attention to make you pay for the subscription,

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna get wilder. It's going to get crazier. That

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 2>is going to be like shock jock news. Headlines that

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 2>make you want to pay for the subscription or pay

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:19.479
<v Speaker 2>for that article, that's what's going to get you over

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 2>the line.

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Now, well, there's a possibility it's going to become far

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>more limited. And we say that because if everybody does

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>go to paid news, there are a lot of free

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 1>news outlets, right but you still then if you are saying, okay,

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I only want to get my news from a free site,

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>so you already cut your options in half, right, Like,

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>so those ones are all paid, not going to even

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 1>look at them. It puts a lot more responsibility back

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.399
<v Speaker 1>on the consumer, which we always encourage that anyway. We

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:46.119
<v Speaker 1>always encourage you as a consumer to have responsibility on

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>where you're getting your news. But it's going to put

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>that No, they don't, but this is what I'm saying.

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>This is going to make that tenfold because your options

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:54.679
<v Speaker 1>are far more limited, so you have to really put

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a bit of thought into where you're going to be

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>accessing the news and why.

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 2>But that's the thing, right, I mean, if we if

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 2>we look at consumer behavior, and I mean I'm guilty

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 2>of this as well, I would say that I'm someone

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 2>who probably above average seeks out the news, like I

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 2>pay for subscriptions myself, but I also ingest so much

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:16.199
<v Speaker 2>of it just because it's been served to me on

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 2>social media and then it's something that I was interested in,

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 2>so that I kind of went down a rabbit hole

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 2>and found more things. The thing is is like, you

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 2>don't know what you don't know, and so by limiting

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 2>people's exposure to what's happening in the world, it makes

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 2>everybody's life a little bit more narrow and everyone's focus

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 2>of interests a little bit more narrow, especially if you're

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 2>expecting them to pay for something that they didn't even

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 2>know that they were interested in in the first place.

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 4>I have a question that I've just thought about. If

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 4>you compare the programs that are something like a YouTube

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 4>and how YouTube pays their creators based off of views.

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 4>And I don't know the metrics completely, but you get

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 4>my point. YouTube actually pays people to create content that

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 4>they put on their platform. Yeah, why it doesn't matter.

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 4>Everyone knows that you can make money through Instagram. But

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 4>correct me if I'm wrong. That is only if you

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 4>are getting paid by a brand, right, Like, yes, if

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 4>you get a million views on a video, they're not

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 4>giving you money to compensate you for the fact that

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:17.679
<v Speaker 4>people have engaged with that content for that long. So

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 4>TikTok is different. YouTube is different. They do pay their

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 4>creators based off of views and time spent on there.

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know TikTok prays their creators.

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 4>It's not in Australia, but it exists in America. I'm

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 4>not sure where else it exists, but I know it

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:31.360
<v Speaker 4>doesn't exist here.

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 2>That is fascinating because the way in which YouTube pays

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 2>you is through they push ads. So if you're watching

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 2>a YouTube video, you would know that like every couple

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 2>of minutes or every whatever time stamp it is, there's

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 2>an ad that is pushed. And it's different to say

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 2>a podcast ad, for example, because we might do ads

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 2>with brands where we work directly with them, we help

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 2>to script, but this is like an ad that they

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 2>have no control over. It's just pushed out onto their platform.

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 2>So that's kind of where the money comes from. And

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 2>that's why YouTube an overall fee because those ads are.

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 3>Worth X amount of money.

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 2>The other thing that I think is important to mention

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 2>is most news outlets make a lot of money from

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 2>their advertising on site. So they make money through banner ads.

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Through like you know, when you're going to Daily Mail

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 2>and you get absolutely fucked in the ahs by ads.

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes you can't even read the article because the ads

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 2>are popping out all over it.

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 2>They're what's called like banner or retargeting ads, and those

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 2>ads are what generates a lot of money for that site.

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 2>So the more hits and users you get to your website, obviously,

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 2>the more money you can make through your website. That's

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 2>how most news organizations make their income. And I don't

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 2>know if it's the biggest percentage of income. I'm not

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 2>sure what the split is, but it is a very

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 2>considerable income for them. And so that's why I kind

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 2>of unpack this idea that well, when you see click

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 2>the link in bio to go to our website, you're

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 2>double profiting from the same thing as a news outlet.

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 2>You're already being paid to put the content on meta,

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 2>but then you're forcibly some of them, some of them,

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 2>the big.

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Users some of them.

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 2>But then you're forcibly pushing users to go to your

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 2>website where you earn more money because they're engaging with

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 2>content there where they're getting retargeting ads. So I think

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 2>that that's why there's this like at the moment, the

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:17.239
<v Speaker 2>dialogue that's happening around this big legislation change. It's going

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 2>to have an immense impact on us as people who

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 2>consume social media, but I also don't know where the

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 2>responsibility lies when you actually look at the complete picture.

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 2>This will affect all of us once this government law

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 2>that was passed in twenty twenty one finally comes to

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 2>an end.

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>It's the things that you don't think about too that

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 1>I found really interesting when I was doing a bit

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of a deep dive. David Anderson, who is the managing

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 1>director of ABC. He has come out and said, look,

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>we're obviously deeply disappointed because off the back of their

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>deal with Meta, they funded roles for sixty journalists. So

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>that's just one. That's just the ABC conglomerate. When you

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>think about every single network or every media outlet that

0:25:56.880 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>has gone and made these financial decisions based off deal

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that they thought was going to be with no end inside,

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I suppose how many people are going to be losing

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>their jobs.

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.239
<v Speaker 2>So many journalists are going to lose their jobs. But

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 2>and I genuinely come back to what we said earlier

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 2>about people like the Conversation, people like SBS even it

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 2>doesn't get a kickback from Meta, the Daily Oz, these

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 2>independent news sources who have been creating fantastic content, contributing

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 2>so deeply to the news cycle and to the news conversation,

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 2>but they haven't been getting a kickback from Meta.

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 3>But they're going to be penalized.

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 2>I think that they are really the ones that are

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 2>going to be the most disadvantaged from this because they've

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 2>built their entire network around creating fucking phenomenal content on

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 2>a platform that is all about engagement, But ultimately, I

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 2>think this raises a bigger question and it's something that

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 2>britt you and I and Kisha we've spoken about so

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:55.640
<v Speaker 2>many times. We're content creators and we create podcasts and

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 2>we are one of the only podcasts in the top

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 2>ten of Australia who doesn't charge subscribers for any additional content.

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Life on Cut is free and has always been free,

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 2>and it's something that we've contemplated. But maybe it comes

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 2>down to imposter syndrome a little bit, where we're.

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 3>Like, fuck, what will people paid for? Well, it's funny.

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Because we got asked to do paid content, like to

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>put up paywalls, to put do patreons, to subscribe month.

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 2>Apple podcasts additional subscription. We had deep meetings with Apple

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 2>around subscription based models.

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>We were asked multiple times and you know this is

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>back before it all kicked off. I'm talking years ago,

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>before anyone in Australia had really gone into the paid

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere because overseas it's normal.

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 2>And we had another meeting about it last year when

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 2>other big players in the Australian landscape were doing it.

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>You guys all know, you know shameless and you know

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Mama Mia. But even shows like I think they're the

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>top show in Australia still one or two case file,

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>which is the true crime.

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Even they do subscription based content.

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 2>But even tiny podcasts do subscription based total content.

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Now and when Mom and Mia, for example, I'm going

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to use them because you know, we're all women that

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>are doing podcasts that are talking about similar things totally.

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>The kickback that they got from their audiences who were

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>always supportive. They have beautiful, loving, caring audiences for years.

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:12.199
<v Speaker 1>And the second that they put a dollar value on

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>their content saying hey, guys, we can't keep doing this

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>for free. People were like, that's wrong, you shouldn't be charging.

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:20.159
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, there's a bunch

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 1>of people that are working really hard to bring you

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>guys things every single week, and they've done so for

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 1>X amount of years for free. Why is it the

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>expectation that it should be for free.

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 2>I think social media has bred a sense of entitlement

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 2>to content. I think we do genuinely think and expect

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 2>that we have free access to everything and.

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 3>That the bucks shouldn't stop with the consumer.

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 2>But I loved Mia Friedman's argument and debate to this

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 2>because they receive so much backlash. And she was like,

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 2>we're a female founded media company. We create incredible content,

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 2>and we should be paid for the content that we

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:56.479
<v Speaker 2>create and the work that we put into it, not

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 2>just from brands and suppliers, but also from the people

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 2>who are consuming it and benefiting from the many incredible

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 2>people who we pay to share their stories. And I

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 2>so deeply agree with this, and I really want to

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 2>make it clear. We are not saying that we don't

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 2>have a subscription model for you guys, for the Life

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 2>is because we think we're better than other podcasts. We

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 2>only do it because of that literal like imposter syndrome

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 2>where we think like, well, are we putting out content

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 2>that we feel as though we can charge people for.

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's an internal thing which I think a

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of women and a lot of creators and a

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of people worry about, you know, price point setting

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 2>and all that sort of stuff. But the world is

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 2>changing and I think for so long we've had free

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 2>access to whatever we've wanted when it comes to content,

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 2>and slowly and slowly we are re educating the consumer

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 2>that content needs to be paid for depending on what

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 2>it is, and I think the same thing is going

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 2>to happen within the news world.

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 2>We're going to become more comfortable with and more accepting

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 2>of the fact that we have to pay for news.

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:57.719
<v Speaker 2>Some people will and some people will have subscriptions, and

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 2>some people will choose to be ignorant because they don't

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 2>care about the news and they don't care about what's

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 2>happening in the world. And to be fair, those people

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 2>probably weren't engaging with news.

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 4>In a very healthy way anyway online. They probably were

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 4>the ones who were reading the headlines and then being sensationalized.

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>And we're also not saying we're about to go and

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>slap on a fee for life on cut like we're not.

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>This isn't us getting you ready for like hey in

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks. But it's a conversation that we

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>do constantly have and maybe one day in the future

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>it's something that we will look at in some capacity.

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 2>We don't know, but it's always an add on. I

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 2>don't I want to warn you guys, if we ever

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 2>did do a subscription model, it's not to access the

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 2>content full stop. Yeah, we're never ever going to take

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 2>away from you. We would only ever be giving you more.

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 3>But we do the model.

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>We've done nearly five years at five hundred and fifty

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>episodes and never charged.

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 3>A dollar for it.

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I think, I mean we charged brands, so the consumer,

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>we've never charged the consumer ever.

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Can I just do them out though?

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 4>And the main concern for me about this whole thing,

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't have a problem paying for my news.

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 3>I pay some news organizations.

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>We pay a dollar a month to the New York

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Times New York I have.

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 4>Scriptions to other podcasts and that kind of thing. I

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 4>don't have a problem with paying a small amount of

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 4>money per month. I think it's a really good thing

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 4>if you can to support the people that you enjoy

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 4>the content from. What I do think is quite concerning

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 4>is that if you look back twenty years ago, where

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 4>there was such a monopoly of information that was shared

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 4>to us media, I'm just gonna go to outright say it.

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 4>They impacted your television news, they impacted your newspaper news.

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 4>And it's only quite recently in the big scale that

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 4>we've seen a push towards a more independent source of information.

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 4>And I think that largely it's because of people like

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 4>cheek media like the Daily os so now taking them

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 4>out of the equation.

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, I'm.

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 4>Still happy to pay for some news sites, but is

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 4>this going to push us back to the fact that

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 4>we get news in a more traditional way. It's so biased,

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 4>it's so skewed to whatever the people who run those

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 4>organizations are willing to show you, and I think that's

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 4>really terrifying. I'm just annoyed about the fact that they

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 4>got funding for what six or seven companies in Australia,

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 4>and yet the more independent ones never got the money,

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 4>and now they're going to be disadvantaged because metter have

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 4>changed their mind and gone, well, we don't want to

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 4>get fined. So to me, it's quite scary because I

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 4>think this is the start of where you could end

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 4>up in an echo chamber, you know. Like, like I said,

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm happy to pay for some subscriptions, but I'm not

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 4>gonna pay for subscriptions to Sky News because I don't

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 4>like their content. But I still read it because I

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 4>go I want to hear the other side. But if

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 4>I had to pay for it, I think it makes

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 4>you end up in a bit of an echo chamber

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 4>if you don't ever see the other opinions, and you're

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 4>not gonna pay for something that you don't like or

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 4>don't agree.

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 2>But also not just like you don't want to pay

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 2>for it. We're in a cost of living crisis. People

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 2>can't pay for the luxuries. Some people can't even pay

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 2>for their own rent and food and taking care of

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 2>their pets, Like there has been a huge increase in

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 2>pets being like left at adoption facilities because people can't

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 2>pay for pet food. They're sure a shit not going

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 2>to be paying for the news. So it is a

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 2>privilege to be able to seek out new information. And

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 2>I kind of hate that we left this to the

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 2>very end to unpack. But the cost of living is

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 2>going to affect people's ability to subscribe because that's a luxury,

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 2>and that's something that I think is unfair.

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>It's time for accidentally unfiltered your most embarrassing story, and

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>we had an absolute banger come in. Now, this is

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>one of those stories that happens when you're a child,

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, those stories that it's not recent, but

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you've never quite moved on from it.

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Okay.

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Last Christmas, all my extended family got together to hang out.

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>We're all sharing our own accidentally unfiltered.

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 3>We love that you're taking this into your family. Yeah,

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 3>we love. We love embarrassing stories.

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>We're all sharing our own acciently unfilters with each other

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and remembering all the embarrassing stuff we've done in our childhood.

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 1>We'd all had a good laugh, and then my aunt

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>brought up a story that myself and my mind had

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously forgotten about for good reason. As the story goes,

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it was my first year at primary school and I

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>had a fresh, brand new Harry Potter lunchbox to take

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:09.880
<v Speaker 1>with me.

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 4>Cute.

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Apparently I was quite a shy kid, and for some

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 1>reason I didn't want to go to the toilet to

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>do a number two. In details that are obviously too

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 1>traumatic to be remembered by anyone, I came home that

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 1>day from school. Mom went to unpack my bag and

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:29.319
<v Speaker 1>smelt something awful. After investigating the sauce, she.

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Discovered that I shipped in my lunch box and brought

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 3>it home. What the fuck? Why?

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Why?

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Wait, that doesn't even make sense. It's still doing your

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.760
<v Speaker 3>shit at school? Yeah you still Where did you swhere?

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Did your ship? Where did you take the lunchbox?

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Did you go into this? I've got to go to

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 3>a storeroom to get a new glue stick.

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>And shit in your lunchbox? Like, where has that shit

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>taken place? Surely you didn't take it to the bathroom

0:34:58.000 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to do the shit.

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 4>More questions when you think, okay, it's embarrassing to do

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 4>in public, did you think that the embarrassing part was

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 4>doing it in the toilet?

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>He's obviously gone to like maybe he's gone to the

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>sports storeroom.

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 4>Remember when in the sports storeroom is worse than just going.

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:20.239
<v Speaker 1>To and then walking around school being ship boy because

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:23.799
<v Speaker 1>that stench, that stench is like coming out of your

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 1>lunch box.

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 3>I just nodded in my own.

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Hair, because like if you're walking through the playground with

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a ship in your bag, people gotta know my Okay.

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 4>I just think if that was me and Marley came

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 4>home with a ship in a lunch box. Oh, we've

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 4>been having to sit down chat. That's a that's a hay, honey,

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 4>and mummy needs to talk to you. Let's go to

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 4>all the toilet, let's go to the bedroom and have

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 4>a little chat around what's happened. I would think that

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:51.279
<v Speaker 4>like maybe she'd gotten bullied into do it. I would

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 4>never assume that.

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 3>She's got bully in your lunch box? What school did

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 3>you gotta get? War Ship Ship Ship.

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 4>I would never assume that she had voluntarily taken her

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 4>lunchbox into a toilet and shit on it.

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 3>I will think that my parenting had failed so deeply.

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>We also love the detail here, like I thought that

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>it was going to have something to do with the story,

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Like the fact that it was a Harry Potter lunchbox had.

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Nothing to do with the story. They just wrote that

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 3>in for some extra detail like the I'm talking of

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 3>brand new Harry bottle line. I appreciate the detail. Guys.

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:23.279
<v Speaker 2>If you have an accidentally unfiltered or something from your

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 2>past that you maybe you've forgotten it and your auntie

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:27.920
<v Speaker 2>has to remind you about it, please send it in

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 2>because we need it and we love it, and we

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 2>won't laugh at you.

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:33.800
<v Speaker 3>We will, but we will also love with you. We

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:36.400
<v Speaker 3>are with you, but no one knows who you are,

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:37.439
<v Speaker 3>so it doesn't matter.

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:41.439
<v Speaker 2>Fine, you're anonymously shitting in lunchboxes all around the country. Anyway, Guys,

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 2>it is time for suck and sweet, our highlight and

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 2>our low light of each and every week.

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 3>You go first okay, my son for this week because

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 3>I can never think. No, I know you can't.

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:53.800
<v Speaker 2>My fun of this week is that, so Matt and

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 2>the girls went away on a cruise. You guys know

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 2>they're home now, but they went away. Yeah, they are

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:01.280
<v Speaker 2>actually anyway for five days. Oh, you were so dramatic.

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:03.839
<v Speaker 4>I made Matt has led me for six months, I said,

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 4>I said, a wheezing the Atlantic.

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 2>I said a week, but it was like five days,

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 2>and five days is close enough to a week. I

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 2>think it started at ten days and then you said

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:12.319
<v Speaker 2>ten days and I was like a week.

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 4>Oh, so I'm the problem. Yeah, it's you anyway. Sorry,

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 4>sorry for misleading everyone with my fate news about how

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 4>long away my husband was.

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:22.239
<v Speaker 2>He was away for five days, But my suck is

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 2>it's not that bad, but it's a bit annoying. It

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:28.840
<v Speaker 2>would have been so nice to have those five days

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:31.759
<v Speaker 2>to actually like relax and maybe go to bed early.

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and start complaining. You went to a rave on

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 3>night when I did.

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 2>That was the only thing I did for myself in

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 2>that whole time that the kids were away. Work has

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 2>been so intense. We've had heaps going on with Tony May.

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 2>We've had so much going on with life on cart

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 2>like every day has been you know, like twelve hour

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:51.359
<v Speaker 2>work days and so getting to bed really late, waking

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 2>up super early in the morning. Which it's good that

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:56.239
<v Speaker 2>they're not here because I would have had immense mum

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 2>guilt if I was trying to do this kind of

0:37:58.280 --> 0:37:59.759
<v Speaker 2>like workload whilst the kids.

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:02.240
<v Speaker 3>But it just kind of hasn't really felt.

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 4>Like, I don't know, I was like, oh my god,

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:05.840
<v Speaker 4>Matt's going, Oh the kids aren't here, I'm gonna be

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 4>able to shave my legs for a change, but I

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:10.839
<v Speaker 4>haven't done that, so to be honest, yeah, that's kind

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 4>of my stuck for the week.

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 3>And then the kids are back.

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:14.719
<v Speaker 2>So Matt being home and having the kids back, that

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 2>is my absolute sweet because I have missed Lola and

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Mary getting into my bed at four in the morning,

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 2>which I know, yeah I have.

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 3>I've missed them. I've missed them so much. So I'm

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 3>so happy that home. That's very sweet. My suck.

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I always have trouble thinking of sucks, and I genuinely

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:33.359
<v Speaker 1>mean that because I just feel like I like my life,

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:35.360
<v Speaker 1>but my suck has to be.

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:37.399
<v Speaker 5>And I just tell you, I'm not growling, don't worry

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 5>when I told you guys I got laser last week.

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 5>I just forgot this part. I got it on all

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 5>my legs and my bikini line. I don't think I

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 5>told you that. So I got a whole Brazilian and

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 5>my legs. Anyway, So she's like, okay, roll over, now

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 5>on do you tummy and I'll lazy your legs. So

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 5>I was like the back of the legs and I

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 5>was like yeah, cool. So I was getting the back

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 5>of my legs laser. And then she goes, do you

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:00.440
<v Speaker 5>want your buttthole done? Is a finisher?

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 3>And I was like, yes, I do. That makes it

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 3>sound like it's a celebration.

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:05.320
<v Speaker 4>No, it kind of sounds like in a pair of

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 4>teeth after your meal. Do you want a little lemon

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:07.840
<v Speaker 4>chello on your butttholder?

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:09.320
<v Speaker 3>You want to finish that? You want a buttthole of

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:09.919
<v Speaker 3>your lemon chello?

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:10.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:12.720
<v Speaker 3>And so I was like a lemon cilla and a buttthole.

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 1>I was like, do what my butthole is it? And

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I was like, well, fuck, I'm already here and I'm

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>laying on my tummy.

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 4>And imagine I didn't get the butthole done and everything

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 4>else was there was not a hair inside, and then

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 4>you bend over did your doggy one day and just

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 4>your buttthole like just like a forest.

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't have I'm not a hair person, dude, I

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:32.879
<v Speaker 1>have no hair on me. I never look my arms.

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:34.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a hairy person. But I was like something

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:36.839
<v Speaker 1>with a hairy buttole would say, I was like, yeah, okay,

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>do it. So she goes all right, spread them and

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, I didn't really think how it's

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:43.560
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. Did you have to eat so humbling?

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you be laying naked on your tummy and everyone

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:49.399
<v Speaker 1>that has had laser nose and then pull your own

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>butt cheeks apart so that this poor woman can get

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in there.

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 3>And I was like, I am sorry, you have to

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:56.719
<v Speaker 3>do this. She's like, it's good. I do it all day,

0:39:57.800 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 3>got in there, zapped.

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 2>It, and I was like, this is mortifying. I have

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:03.239
<v Speaker 2>so many hemorrhoids from giving birth that I would not

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:08.440
<v Speaker 2>want to have off my hemorrhoids while you're there. Please

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:08.880
<v Speaker 2>thank you.

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 3>No, that's mortifying. So that was my suck.

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:12.800
<v Speaker 1>And the other part is like you have to do

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:14.799
<v Speaker 1>that multiple times. It's not a one off like it's

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like a six treatment thing. Anyway, to

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 1>do six buttthhole reveals my buttony is less all right? Well, anyway, guys,

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and I haven't got a suite yet. Oh shit, sorry,

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>my sweet is boring for everyone. But I caught up

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 1>with a friend that I haven't seen in a very

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 1>long time, and that was it.

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:33.879
<v Speaker 3>We went to lunch.

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 1>We had a really nice day because I feel like

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't make a lot of time for my friends,

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and I've really thought about that lately. I was like,

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it's shitty of me to be, you know, like you

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 1>just said, Laurie, You're like work work, work, work, work,

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:45.920
<v Speaker 1>It's so easy, Like, sorry, I don't have time this week.

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's do next week. Let's do next week. And all

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, it's been eight months.

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:52.279
<v Speaker 2>We actually have a very interesting conversation about this coming up,

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:54.839
<v Speaker 2>which around friendships. We did a poll or we did

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 2>call out sorry on Instagram, so you guys might have

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:58.240
<v Speaker 2>seen it, but that is in the works.

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, guys, that's it. That's it for and you know

0:41:00.960 --> 0:41:01.319
<v Speaker 3>the drill.

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:04.240
<v Speaker 2>If you have enjoyed the episode, please go leave a review,

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:06.800
<v Speaker 2>share it with your friends, tell your mum about it,

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 2>like all the stuff, and.

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget we have a YouTube channel on our so

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you can go and watch all of our content, well

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 1>most of it. We don't put every single thing up there,

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 1>but there's there's gonna be some extra behind the scenes stuff.

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 3>It's really different to be.

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Able to sit down and watch these interviews as opposed

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to just listening to them, especially when we have our

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 1>guests in the room.

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Also, speaking of guests, can we just take one second

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:29.319
<v Speaker 2>to appreciate how well behaved both little doggoes were.

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Goodest, goodest babies.

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 2>We have a really incredible episode for you tomorrow with

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:37.400
<v Speaker 2>one of our very own Nikia love O.

0:41:38.320 --> 0:41:39.080
<v Speaker 3>She is a lifer.

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 2>She has been so active in the Facebook community. You

0:41:42.400 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 2>may have seen her if you are part of the

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 2>discussion group Nikiya. She found out she had lukemia and

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 2>she was posting her journey in our Life Uncut discussion group.

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Now knowing that this is the month of the World's

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Greatest Shave and it's also around leukemia awareness, but Nikiya's

0:41:57.360 --> 0:42:02.719
<v Speaker 2>story and that interview was honestly for me. It was

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 2>one of my deep favorites and I don't know how

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 2>to describe this without how I can get this across

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:10.440
<v Speaker 2>to you any more than saying it was like a

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 2>life changing chat. And I think also because it's somebody

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 2>who feels so familiar to us. She's a friend of us,

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 2>She's someone who is so part of the life on

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:21.320
<v Speaker 2>CUT DNA and the life on CUT community. It reminded

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 2>me of the type of conversation we had with Chanelle Bryant.

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:27.320
<v Speaker 2>She spoke about her breast cancer and how much that

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 2>conversation stayed with me and meant to me and Nikki

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 2>loves she's currently in remission with her cancer journey, but

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:36.479
<v Speaker 2>she shares about fertility, she shares about her pregnancy loss

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:39.760
<v Speaker 2>and also about overcoming cancer. It is a fucking amazing

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:41.960
<v Speaker 2>conversation and that will be tomorrow's atte.

0:42:42.560 --> 0:42:45.399
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget to mum Te daante dontee friends and share

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the love because we love love.

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 3>The Ova cot As, the Gabaaa Bay, thea