WEBVTT - Insta-Alcohol Campaigns, America's First Black Bachelor & The Golf Swing

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Outspoken. The podcast is not afraid to say

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you're thinking. Our names are Amy Kate and

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Sophie Torbor.

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 2>We're identical triplets, but we often.

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Don't have identical opinions, so sometimes things can get heated.

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Outspoken covers all things reality TV, influences, entertainment, and issues

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>facing women.

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 3>That is so fetch Thank you.

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to Outspoken. Thank you for joining us again.

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Now it is a momentous week for us because Sophie

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is becoming a mother, well a fur mother, and we

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 1>have been counting down the days as it has been

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>eight weeks now. SOPHI, yeah, it's been eight very very

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>long weeks. I have had like a countdown going since

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>week six. I keep sending my boyfriend Brandon updates of

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>how many more sleeps it is. It is currently four

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>more sleeps till mister Archie comes into my life. And

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>there is a bit of contentious issues around the name

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>because I think you should be calling the dog Manuka

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>because it is a goalded.

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 2>This is great.

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Off the back of our puppy farming topic yesterday, It's

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely not from a puppy farm, is it. Sophie's from

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:11.839
<v Speaker 1>a very prestigious breeder and Adelaide it is the only

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>one that breeds golden coccusstig. Well, yeah, well it's a

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 1>golden It's a golden Cocker Spaniel. And what's funny about

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that is that Sophie's boyfriend's last name is Hancock.

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 2>But don't you.

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>Think that it would be really cute to be called

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Manuka because it's a honey flavor.

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 2>Manuka Honey, it's a that's a girl's.

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Name, though, No, I think it's unisex. Well, I think

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Archie because we've got Meghan and Harry who have Archie,

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Master Archie. We can call him archiball if he's being naughty.

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 2>But do you know what Archie?

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>The name Archie for a dog is like a diamond,

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't if I you know, if you want this dog

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to go off on Instagram, which I think you do

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>because you've already made an Instagram account for the dog

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>by actually having it, I think you should call it

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Manuka if anyone would like to go and follow him.

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>It's Archie and it's got a golden Cocker Spaniel potentially

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>changed to Minuka.

0:01:58.040 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, I feel like spaniel.

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Well, I feel like when you're at the dog park,

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna really feel that there are a lot of

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>archies out there. When you call him back and there's

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>like ten dogs come running at you, I think you're

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna regret not calling a mahanookah. The thing that I'm

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>most worried about is I've done so much research into

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Cocker spaniels and apparently they we every thirty minutes, which

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>is similar to me. I've got a very very small bladder,

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>So we'll be getting along just fine. Well, in regards

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to the name, we will put a poll up and

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to see if you agree with Kate and I that

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Sophie should call her puppy manookah or if she should

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>just call it Archie. What about Winston, I know that

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 1>was a name that we allso his name.

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Is already on his official.

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Breeders letters can be changed.

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Manookah.

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Look, I think that Amy and I, even though were aunties,

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>we probably have no writing naming. Well. I think if

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm paying two and a half grand for this dog,

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I should be able to name it. Well. Anyway, let's

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>move along, and I'm sure Sophie will be inundating The

0:02:53.919 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>outspoken Instagram feed with pictures of Archie. Have you been

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>wondering why there's an influx of influencers promoting alcohol on

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>your news feed? Like many businesses, the alcohol industry has

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>been forced to pivot their marketing to reflect social distancing

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and self isolation. And with influencers normal brand deals falling

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 1>through thanks to the pandemic, many have lined up payments

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>through alcohol brands. Sob, can you explain to us just

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>how prevalent alcohol advertising is in the influencer sphere? Well,

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>even before lockdown, alcohol advertising with influencers has been incredibly prevalent.

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean you look at a recent study by vic

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Health and it shows that three quarters of Australia's top

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy influencers feature alcohol in their posts, and worryingly, only

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a quarter of those actually reveal that these posts are

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>sponsored and have been paid for. And vic Health has

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>described the alcohol's industry's use of social media as completely

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>underhanded and says that it is used to influence young children. Well,

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>one bit of info I found really interesting was the

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a that influencers are actually allowed to promote alcohol. I

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize that you had to be over the age

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of twenty five to actually be advertising alcohol. Yeah, that

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>really surprised me because it made me reflect there are

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of big influencers out there who have been

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty quiet in the alcohol space. While they'll show themselves drinking,

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen them officially advertising alcohol.

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 2>That was an interesting revelation.

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, a few years back there was actually a campaign

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>from a vodka cruser company, and they received a lot

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of complaints because the model that they used in their

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>ad looked a lot younger than eighteen. She was over eighteen,

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>but people said she looked as if she was a teenager,

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and so there were a lot of complaints. She even

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the ad showed her using glitter to cover

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>up dark circles around her eyes, which are obviously caused

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 1>from heavy drinking as well, which a lot of people

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>thought was a bit unnecessary. I do find this whole

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>over twenty five thing pretty interesting because for someone who

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>has always been idd up until my late twenties, I

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 1>always got annoyed because apparently the and selling the alcohol

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>must think that you look over twenty five. So it's

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>quite interesting that even an influencer who can legally drink

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>isn't actually allowed to advertise an alcoholic product. But how

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:14.239
<v Speaker 1>many influencers who are over twenty five, how many would

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 1>you confuse for being in the early twenties as well.

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean it opens up a camera. I think it's

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 1>quite the opposite. Chloe Zepp, I literally thought she was

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in her late twenties and I found out she's only

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty one. So it's quite interesting that she can't advertise

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>alcohol even though she has been. We'll get into that

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later. The other thing that I didn't

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 1>know was that if you are promoting alcohol, twenty five

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>percent of your audience can't be under the age of eighteen,

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>which is a rule that I didn't know was in place,

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and it is a good rule to have. That is good,

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 1>but on social media you can be so deceptive with

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>your age. I remember making accounts back in the day

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>for our little cousins on Facebook, and I think you

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 1>had to be over thirteen, and we of course just

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>put that they were over thirteen when there were eight

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and ten.

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 2>That is such a.

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>Good point, And the thing that a lot of people

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>don't realize is in Australia, the alcohol industry self regulates

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it's advertising, which means that there's no government body to

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>intervene and to keep people accountable. Yeah, and that means

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that an alcohol company can put out an ad on

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>social media and it doesn't have to be approved by

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the government. It just has to meet these certain code

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of ethics. However, as Soav said, that's a self regulated

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>code of ethics, and while people can make complaints to

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the Advertising Standards Bureau, it's just a system where they

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>then look into it and the ad is taken down.

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>So what I found really interesting is that when an

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 1>influencer works with an alcohol brand, if it is deemed

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that the ad doesn't meet this code of ethics, then

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 1>the add has just pulled. The influencer has to delete

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>their post, but there's no onus on the influencer to

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>ensure that that post meets the standards, which I found

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. In light of Kendall Jenner getting sued for

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>her involvement in advertising the Fire Festival, it seems like

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the Australian law is a lot more lenient on influencers

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 1>than it is in say the UK and America, where

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>we have seen an influx of influence advertising alcohol during

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen Kate, how has alcohol marketing changed since the pandemic. Well,

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>just like a lot of other industries, the alcohol industry

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>has had to pivot their marketing to reflect social distancing

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and self isolation. So many have taken this opportunity to

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>capitalize on people staying at home by promoting their contact

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>less home deliveries, which is raising a lot of issues

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>because that means that people don't have to show ID.

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>So you can be a kid and you can go

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in order from BWUS alcohol and then the alcohol has

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>just dropped at your door. The delivery person doesn't have

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to see who's getting the alcohol.

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 2>So it's a bit of a worry what you don't

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 2>even have to put in your ID.

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, you could literally take your parents' ID, put the

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>details in at the checkout and then it's just dropped

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>off at the door. I think the other thing that

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>is worrying is a lot of brand seem to be

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>promoting stockpiling and heavy consumption of alcohol during this time

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>as well. I mean, you look at Thirsty Camel and

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>they were made to remove a Facebook post because it

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>joked about customers stockpiling their goods as opposed to toilet paper,

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and they were made to remove this post. But it

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>does come into question whether brands can actually use humor

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>or memes to convey a particular message during this time. Yeah. Well,

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I think with the Thirsty Camel example, they had a

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>complaint made and their response was, well, it was in

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>humor and it was in good fun, but it actually

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>had to be taken down because it did breach the

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>code of ethics. And I think it's interesting to note

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that obviously during the pandemic a lot of bars and

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>clubs have been closed, and that has meant that alcohol

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>consumption in bottle shops in the last week of March

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>actually rose eighty six percent compared to the year before. Well,

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I've had heaps of friends who say that they can't

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>believe how often they've now been to b ws's or

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you drive through alcohol places since the pandemic. Well, it's

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>fairly obvious because I've seen a lot of my own

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>friends and people I know that are drinking more. And

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's because when you're working at home, there's

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.959
<v Speaker 1>no differentiation between the weekend and a week night.

0:08:58.080 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 2>It just seems like a lot.

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 1>Of people are awarding themselves with alcohol, which is their choice.

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>But I suppose it does trickle down into people that

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>are at home with kids and that becoming a normalized

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>thing to do.

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I have seen a lot of posts that are sort

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.199
<v Speaker 1>of promoting alcohol as a relaxant. So, whether it's just

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>mums who are saying, oh, I'm having a wine tonight

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>because basically the kids are home from school when they're

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>driving me mental, but there are apparently laws around promoting

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>alcohol as a relaxant.

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>One of the codes says that that you must not

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>suggest the consumption of alcohol may create or contribute to

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a significant change in mood or environment, or suggests that

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>it offers any therapeutic benefits. And I think that what

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>has landed a lot of alcohol brands in hot water

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, because that seems to be their key

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>marketing strategy. A lot have also started offering care packages

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. I think in terms of promoting alcohol as

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a relaxant, I think BWS as Good wines Chat has

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>really done that. So they've got comedian Celeste Barber as

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the face of their campaign, and obviously everyone loves Celest

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and she's Hilens and she is in isolation and the

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>first part of the campaign is she's got like a

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>towel on her head, she's got a robe on, and

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>she's got you know, like the little eyemasks that you

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>see everyone in isolation wearing, and she is rewarding herself

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:14.599
<v Speaker 1>with a glass of champagne.

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god.

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I was actually shocked when I saw one of her

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>recent videos because it showed her it sort of implied

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that she just got out of bed and then the

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>BWS had dropped off some drinks to her doorstep, and

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>then she pops open the champagne and I think it

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>was a wine, sorry, and she starts drinking it in

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the morning, and I would assume that that's almost promoting

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 1>binge drinking in a way. I just felt kind of

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable about how it.

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Was all right.

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think looking closer at bws's campaign, I think

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.319
<v Speaker 1>they have been quite ethical in the influences they have used,

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of them are a bit of a

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>slightly older demographic. You know, you've got Georgia Love who's

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>in her thirties, Olivia Rodgers who's late twenties, and also

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Celeste Barbara, as you said, who's in her forties. And

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>they've also required all of the influencers to write hashtag

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>ad which legally isn't required of them, but is an

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>ethical step in making sure that young people don't think

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that this is just what they do it. They're actually

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>getting paid for this. The thing is, while they're being

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>ethical around it, do you guys actually feel a little

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>bit uncomfortable when you do see alcohol being advertised on

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>say podcasts or in your Instagram fee Because I'm finding

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit sort of I don't.

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 2>Know if I like it.

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's really ramped up, and that is due to

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic because while a lot of brands marketing budgets

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>have dropped off, obviously, the alcohol industry is booming because

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>people are ordering more alcohol online and at the bottle shop,

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>so they have marketing budget to push onto influencers. So

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe an influencer who maybe didn't want to advertise alcohol

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>before is actually thinking, well, I might actually have to

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>because all my other brand deals have dropped off. Well,

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a crazy stat that shows that social media

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>brands advertising alcohol have risen by three hundred and fifty

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>percent during the coronavirus pandemic. And there was a little

0:11:57.440 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>study done on a Friday night and it showed that

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>every thirty five seconds there was a new alcohol brand

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 1>advertising something which is pretty scary. Well, I think it's

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>also interesting because a lot of alcohol brands invest a

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of money into festivals that are obviously not happening

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, so that means they've got, as we

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>were saying before, a bigger budget to spend on influencers. Well,

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>on the topic of alcohol promotion and festivals, I didn't

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>realize that so many alcohol companies actually paid for influencers

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to go to events like Coachella, And also when there

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>are festivals that are sponsored by alcohol companies, I didn't

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>realize as well that they will send photographers down to

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>get sort of sneaky picks of the festival, but they

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>will purposely choose people to pose with cups promoting whatever

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>brand it is, or bottles or whatever.

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 2>I suppose it's a.

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Bit like when Canadian Clubs sponsored the Australian Open and

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>they had the Canadian Club Bar and they invited a

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of influencers to attend.

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 2>I think with festivals as well, I think we're used.

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>To seeing clothing brands sending influencers and you don't really

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>look into the deals then that they have with alcohol

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>brand because you just generally think that influencers are going

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to be drinking at these events. That is true, I mean,

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>playing Devil's Advocate, we kind of seem as if we're

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 1>demonizing any influencer that does promote alcohol, which I don't

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>necessarily think is a bad thing. I think what I

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.679
<v Speaker 1>find a bit iffy though, is the fact that some

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of the influencers who are being targeted do have a

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>very young and impressionable audience. Well that's based on our

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.679
<v Speaker 1>own impression, though, because if we don't have access to

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>their analytics, so we really don't know. Like you might

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>think that someone has a young audience, but when you

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>look into it, they may not. But what I would

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.439
<v Speaker 1>find interesting is how is the audience looked at. So

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>someone like Michael Finch or Shiny Grimman, who you may

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 1>think has a young audience, their young audience might all

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>be on YouTube, but their older audience might be on Instagram.

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering if whatever platform that they choose to advertise on,

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>is it just that audience that they look at, Because

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>there are people that are huge on YouTube and Instagram

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook and TikTok. Well TikTok's a big one because

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously TikTok have a massively young audience, so it's just

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see. Is it just that one.

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Platform that they look at now.

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>We touched on before that you actually have to be

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>over twenty five in order to promote alcohol on Instagram,

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:15.719
<v Speaker 1>But I actually didn't realize that if you have publicized

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that you have an issue with alcohol, you're actually not

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>meant to be able to promote alcohol either, which kind

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of opens another can of worms because we have seen

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell Orvil recently talk about his issues with alcohol, but

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>he's also then when he's talked about his issues with

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>alcohol in different podcasts or different interviews, he's then spooked

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>his own alcohol business. Yeah. Well, for those who don't

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>know Mitchell Orval, he has admitted to being an alcoholic

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and has spoken very openly about his struggles with that

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and also his struggles with drug addiction. And as you say,

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it is kind of an awkward situation because he is

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a recovering alcoholic who runs an alcohol brand, and recently

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>they have got quite inventive and creative with the ways

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>they're promoting their brand. They're doing a lot of competitions

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>in order to give away their their product, and that

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>does get them into a little bit of trouble because

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>there are rules around promotions of competitions which encourage heavy

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>consumption of alcohol. Yeah, so one of their competitions is

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit similar to the Charlie and the Chocolate

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Factory finding the Golden Ticket, except you I think it's

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>using your smartphone. You scan the bottle of wine and

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>if there's a some sort of gremlin or Genie or

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>something I'd like a Pokemon.

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, some sort of character.

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Comes out, you win. I also think in terms of

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the competition, another interesting side of this whole thing with

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell is the fact that he's actually only twenty three,

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and when I was looking through the Instagram page that

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>promotes his alcohol business, his girlfriend Chloe Zepp was obviously

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>front of the promotion and she's only twenty one. So

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it is interesting because obviously, as we said, it's a

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>self regulated system and it's based on people making complaints,

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think the everyday person would know that

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that's what the ruling is. So in that scenario, while

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>they're sharing photos of Chloe Zepp, my understanding is both

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell and Chloe own the company. So in terms of

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>people actually getting in trouble. They would probably get in

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>trouble if they are breaching those guidelines because they're the owners,

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>they're not just appearing as influencers. Well that's a really

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>tough one though, because if you are a young influencer,

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>lots of people make up their own brands. It is

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>weird that you can be over eighteen be allowed to

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>own the brand, but yet can't appear in the marketing. Well.

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Another very problematic campaign that has come up during COVID

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen is a US beer company called Bush Beer. I

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>hope I'm pronouncing that right, because I have not drunk

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a beer in my life for to pronounce Bush beer.

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>It's b usc h, so I assume that's Bush anyway.

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>So they've had a campaign where in order to win

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>three months worth of beer, you have to foster or

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>adopt a dog from a rescue center. Now, how many

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>problematic issues does that bring up? I mean, are we

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>going to have these dogs then having to find a

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>new home once this campaign is over?

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, what's the issue?

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>So you can have some competitions, but you can't have others.

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was that you you.

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Can't promote a competition where you're sculling alcohol. I'm more

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>saying that this campaign is an issue because people are

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>going to go out and buy a dog and then

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>they are going to probably abandon the dog when they

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.959
<v Speaker 1>haven't won the competition. Specially if it's an alcoholic that

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>really wants to win our year supply of beer, is

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it best that we get them to foster a dog. Yeah,

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Well, the rule there is amy that

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>marketers must not encourage the excessive or rapid consumption of alcohol.

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 1>So where there are competitions, for instance, like Mitchell Orvil's

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>where they're promoting you to find a golden ticket, that

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 1>is encouraging you to buy more and more and more beer,

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>so you couldn't do like a neck nomination as an

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Instagram competition. No, probably not anymore. It is interesting because

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the whole issue of influencers promoting alcohol is it is

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>really glamorizing alcohol consumption. And I suppose in some way

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>binge drinking and daily drinking. And if you look at

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>laws surrounding the advertisement of gambling, you're actually not allowed

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to glamorize gambling. So it'll be interesting to see if

0:17:57.440 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>there are laws in the future which stop the glamor

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>rization of alcohol. I definitely think there needs to be

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>those rules in place. Well, I think the interesting thing

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:07.239
<v Speaker 1>is that we always seem to be a little bit

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>behind with the influencer industry. As we touched upon earlier,

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the Australian laws are very different to the UK and

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>American laws and it's sort of reflected in one of

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the campaigns that has been launched by the Alcohol and

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Drug Foundation. So recently, off the back of the pandemic,

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>they launched a campaign saying you haven't been drinking alone

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that was based on kids seeing their parents drinking in lockdown.

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>The ads centered around kids on stage zoom calls and

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>they were repeating commonly used adult phrases in regards to drinking.

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's quite interesting that there's this big focus on

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.640
<v Speaker 1>drinking in the home, but not so much on how

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>kids are viewing drinking by influential people on the internet

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that are readibly coming into their home as well. Well,

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it's obviously working for alcohol companies because they keep doing it,

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>so they're obviously seeing a return on their investment. Well,

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it's also a lot cheaper than paying for a big

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>shoot with five models you can't really track that return

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>on investment, but you get five influencers in we then

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>create their own content.

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 2>So if you look at.

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:06.959
<v Speaker 1>The BWS, Olivia Rodgers has gone and take in her

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>own photo of her and her dog on the couch.

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Love has filmed her own little video about it.

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's like they don't have to pay for the

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>production of the video. They're getting that influencers audience, so

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it's probably a lot cheaper than creating a big new

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 1>campaign that they film themselves. You know what's scary though,

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 1>all the ads seem to be targeted at women, and

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>there have been stats recently that showed consumption of alcohol

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>has risen by at least forty percent for young women,

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing more and more young women who are

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 1>going out and are binge drinking. I mean, I'm not

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>saying it's not okay for people to enjoy a drink

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>on the weekend, but it is a little bit scary

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 1>when you can see the alcohol companies specifically targeting young women,

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>not a normalizing I think the thing that is most

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>concerning is that the alcohol is of course a depressant,

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>so in these times, we we're already feeling anxious and

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>stress that's just going to emphasize these feelings further. And

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>these effects are creating new habits, as you guys were

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>suggesting before, So once we do return to normal, we're

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>going to see more people binge drinking during the week

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:06.360
<v Speaker 1>because it's a new habit that they've developed.

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it's this issue of normalizing it, which was

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>very apparent in choosing someone like Celeste Barber who everyone

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>relates to, and then having her drinking through the day.

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>It's almost an excuse that, well, she's doing it, so.

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 2>I can do it as well.

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Well. I just think that instead of being bombarded with

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.400
<v Speaker 1>all of these ads encouraging us to drink, there should

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>be some more education around what alcohol can actually do

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 1>to us and the negative effects it's having. But do

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you guys think the onus is on the influencer to

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>actually reject these campaigns? Because I know it is a

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>hard time for influencers, as we were saying, a lot

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of their income has dropped off because brands can't be

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>paying for the advertisement they previously had. But do you

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of influencers should actually just be.

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Saying, no, I'm not going to do these ads.

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's interesting you say that, because I did notice

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>on the weekend Sarah Davidson, who's an influencer, put out

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a video and she had partnered up with Jacob Creek Wines.

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 1>And in the video, it showed her in a husband

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>putting together a boozy lunch for her family. But in

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the caption of the video, she said that she doesn't

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>really regularly partake in drinking. And I found that odd

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>because for someone who also doesn't drink regularly, I would

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>find it weird to be approached by an alcohol company

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and then be putting out an ad saying, oh yeah,

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>buy this alcohol when I don't actually drink it.

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 2>It kind of took the validity away from the ad. Well,

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 2>she did it in a clever way though, because she

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 2>obviously doesn't drink.

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>That's why she put on the lunch for her family,

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 1>So it was clever of her to actually promote it

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in that way rather than her just pretending she was

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>drinking it.

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I think it was one of the better ads.

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Well. The thing that didn't really sit well with me

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>was seeing a number of influencers who are mental health

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 1>advocates promoting alcohol is this kind of self care product,

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and as I touched on because it is a depressant. Yeah,

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it just didn't align well with me. It just didn't

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>sit well with me. I get what you're saying, but

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a bit unfair because I think even

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>if you are a mental health advocate, you can responsibly

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>enjoy a drink. So I don't know, but I think

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>if your audience has made up for people following you

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>because you are that advocate, it is a bit troubling.

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Do you know what though?

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I look at some of those ads and

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I see straight through, I'm like, that's an ad.

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, it would have been.

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Nice if people had used the hashtag drink responsibly, which

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't used in any of the ads. I suppose, moving

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 1>forward into more normality, it will be really interesting to

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>see how the alcohol companies again pivot and with more

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of a budget now for influencers, how that's going to

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 1>move on and look like in the future.

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 2>Actually, so sunny.

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's move on to the pit and peak of the

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:33.919
<v Speaker 1>social media week, and the peak for me had to

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 1>be when Kim Kardashian shared a worksheet her son Saint

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>had made for her for Mother's Day.

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 2>Did you guys see this yes, it was bloody hilarious.

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>So in the sheet, he had to fill out some

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>questions about his mum and included her age, which he

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>put as eleven years old. It also said what she

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 1>likes to do, the best thing, She cooks her favorite food.

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>It was quite interesting that he noted she likes to

0:22:57.680 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>leave me alone.

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Now, I'm not quite sure if that was insinuating that

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 2>he's always with his nanny.

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, I've read a couple of articles about mum shaming

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>during the coronavirus pandemic, and Kim Kardashian has been one

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>who has being shamed a lot. I mean, she got

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in trouble because she asked her audience what are some

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>fun activities that we can do with kids during this time?

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>And people thought, oh, because you're a mum, you should

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>be able to come up in your own activity. So

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>I think she has been unfairly criticized during this time. Well,

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>one other thing, I mean, I'm not trying to shame her,

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>but it was funny he put, as you can see,

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>my mum is special because and he wrote, she snuggles

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>me and she buys things for me. Now, I found

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that quite hilarious considering her wealth and the amount that

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.439
<v Speaker 1>they I'm assuming they would be spoiled. I thinks that

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>being said, I think it's all in fun. I mean,

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>she probably wouldn't have shared it if he was being genuine.

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you think the teachers sit there and the kids

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:48.640
<v Speaker 1>are like, oh, shah, right this and they're like, yeah,

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>go on, well, moving on to the pit of the week.

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>And I am getting so frustrated because I am literally

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing the I Am Beautiful filter everywhere and it's really

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>annoying me. So for those who aren't familiar with the filter,

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it is one way you kind of end up looking

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>like an alien, so your nose is really thinned out,

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>then you've got really big lips, and I think it

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>also enlarges your eyes. Now, bet Judd has been guilty

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 1>of using this filter quite a lot, and I usually

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>watch her stories and I'm kind of thinking why she

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>looks so different, and then there's that light bulb moment

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>where I'm like, oh, she's using that filter. The thing

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 1>that sounds a bit contradictory is calling it I AM

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.919
<v Speaker 1>Beautiful footer, because to me, that sounds like a caption

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 1>about embracing your own natural beauty, not putting on a

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>filter to make your nose look incredibly thin and your

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>lips look big.

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 2>I just feel like.

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 1>It's weird for influencers to do it because we obviously

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>know what they look like, and then it's just normalizing

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>them looking a certain way, so then that they then

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>begin face tuning their photos so they look like the

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>filter they're using on their story. I think Instagram is

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>going to run into a lot of trouble with these

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>new filters because, as you say, there needs to be

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 1>some regulations because it's promoting plastic surgery for children, because

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>they're getting a look at what they could look like

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>with these enhanced features, and it's not giving them any

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>realistic impression of what other women look like in real life.

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Was really contradictory, because I feel like the Instagram stories

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>were brought in to provide a more authentic look into

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>people's lives, and since the introduction of the filters, it's

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>now beginning to have that esthetic across to the Instagram

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>story that we kind of rebelled against on the feed.

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Mad Mardeling, Bad.

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Mardeling.

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Now let's get into the reality wrap and after eighteen

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>years and forty seasons, the American Bachelor finally has a

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.120
<v Speaker 1>black leading man. Now, Kay, can you tell us about

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Matt James. So, mattters a twenty eight year old real

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>estate broker, and the most interesting thing about his selection

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.199
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that he hasn't actually yet appeared on

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>The Bachelorette. So he was actually friends of a contestant

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>from Hannah B's season, so people have seen him when

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>she went on the hometown visit because he was a

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.239
<v Speaker 1>friend of one of the contestants. And he actually was

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:02.120
<v Speaker 1>picked to appear in Claire Crawley's season of The Bachelorette,

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>which is yet to be filmed because it's been pushed

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 1>back because of the pandemic. So he was announced in

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 1>her cast, but suddenly he's now been taken off her

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>cast and is the Bachelor. And this is all because

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Bachelor Diversity campaign that was launched a couple

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of days ago, and in a couple of days it

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>received over ninety thousand signatures. Wow, that's incredible. I mean,

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>it is amazing that we are going to have our

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>first black bachelor in America. But the thing that is

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>troubling is it does seem like a knee jerk reaction

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and kind of almost not very genuine by the Bachelor team. Well,

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the interesting thing is the diversity campaign has actually called

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>for thirteen steps for the ABC and Warner Brothers who

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>produced The American Bachelor, to combat racism. So the first

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>step was to actually cast at their first black Bachelor.

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>On your view of it being a knee jerk reaction,

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that's actually what Rachel lindsay, who was the first black

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>female bachelort, That's exactly what she said.

0:26:58.600 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 2>She congratulated Matt.

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>She said, I'm happy to see that a black man

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 1>was cast after eighteen years and fourteen seasons. I believe

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:07.400
<v Speaker 1>it is a step in the right direction. I would

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>be remiss to not point out that, based on the

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 1>current climate, it feels like a knee jerk reaction and

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a result of societal pressure. This announcement, without any further

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>commitments regarding diversity, sweepingly brushes deeper issues under the rug

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>until we see action to address the systematic racism within

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 1>the franchise. The casting use today is equivalent to the

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>trend of posting a black box on your social media

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>account without other steps taken to dismantle the systems if injustice.

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 1>What do you guys think of her comments. Well, it's

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>actually not the first time she's condemned the Bachelor series.

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>So she's got her own podcast talking about The Bachelor,

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and she has come out and said it's embarrassing that

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>they haven't had a black Bachelor, and two years ago

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 1>she actually said that that the Bachelor production team didn't

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>look after her and one of the after the Rose

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>ceremonies and that she was getting baited and harassed on air.

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>She's also been critical of the casting of The Bachelor before,

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 1>so she was saying that social media influencers are ruining

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bachelor because they're just picking them as contestants and

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 1>they're not actually there to find love. So it's quite

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting that she has made so many comments about the

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Bachelor and Bachelorette which are true. I think it's great

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think we would have seen a black

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Bachelor in the twenty fifth season of The Bachelor if

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it hadn't been for Rachel pushing it. Well, it's interesting

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to look a bit closer to home. And of course

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.399
<v Speaker 1>in Australia, Blake Garvey was our second Bachelor and he

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>is of course a black man. But what is troubling

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:30.360
<v Speaker 1>is despite the fact that he was our second Bachelor.

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Black people have not been well represented as contestants in

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the Australian franchise and that's something they too have been

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>heavily criticized for well, and that's exactly what this diversity

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>campaign petitioner is calling for. So not only did they

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>want a black man cast as the lead, but they

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>also said that black and indigenous people of color should

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>make up thirty five percent of the cast. Now. Bachelor

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>creator Mike Fleece has actually previously blamed the show's lack

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of diversity on the claim that, for whatever reason, people

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of color don't come forward to actually be on the show.

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like you can't say that, Like it's.

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 2>A bit of a how do you prove that? I'm sorry?

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>When you look at shows like The Bachelor or any

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>other reality show, they do have casting call and people

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>do apply, but most of the time they ignore those

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>calls and they find them.

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 2>They find them on Instagram.

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's ridiculous, exactly right, So why are we not

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at Instagram of people of color and inviting them

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to be on the show.

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 2>It's a bit of a cop out.

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, despite it being a knee jerk reaction, it is

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a good reaction and it is a positive step forward.

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>And this guy, he looks incredible. I'm really looking forward

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to seeing how this all plays out. Yeah. Well, Matt

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>himself has actually been asked about what he thinks of

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the decision, and he said he thinks it's a step

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in the right direction. And he was actually asked about

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>what type of woman he's looking for, and he said,

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not a black and white thing. So I'm hoping

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that when the limo pulls up, there's a lot of

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 1>diversity and I see every type of woman coming out

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of that limo. So we'll be interesting to see how

0:29:57.160 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>The Bachelor follows through with that casting process. Well, it's

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of ironic because I watched the show Unreal, which

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>is sort of a fictitious take on The Bachelor. Well,

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it's actually been produced by a former Bachelor producer, so

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people think it's kind of behind the

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>scenes of what really happens on the show. Yeah, and

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>even in a few of the episodes, they've brought up

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the issue that there aren't a lot of people of

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 1>color on those shows, and there was a reoccurring sort

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of storyline that they needed to have this particular man

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>who was a person of color make a certain week

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>like apparently a person of color had never made it

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>past week three or something crazy like that. Was not

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>surprising because you do see that they have a couple

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of black guys on there, but they never seem to actually,

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>as you say, make it through a certain level, and

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>they're never very big.

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Parts of the show.

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, Lindsey, I think she was probably only one woman

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of color that actually made it to the top four.

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think it has a lot more to do

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>with the percentage of people of color put in as contestants.

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>If they suddenly put in thirty five percent contestants who

0:30:58.000 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>are of color, we will see a lot more people

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of make it further into the show. Yeah. Well, The

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Bachelor did release a statement on the issue, and they said,

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>we know we have a responsibility to make sure the

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>love stories we're seeing on screen are representative of the

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>world we live in, and we are proudly in service

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to our audience. This is just the beginning, and we

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:17.959
<v Speaker 1>will continue to take action with regard to diversity issues

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>on this franchise. So fingers crossed that this is the

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>start of a really big change and we will see

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bachelor, ticking off those thirteen points that the Bachelor

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Diversity campaign has asked for.

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 3>If you said to me, Sky, what's two times? What's

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 3>eight times? Twoe like, I would not even know. I

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 3>cannot tell you.

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Now let's get into our favorite topic of the week,

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and it is, of course awkward turtle. Now, we thought

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>we'd kick off this discussion by talking about the awkward

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and kind of eye rolling things that your partner does.

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>That then you're somewhat implicated in Now, Kate, you have

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a story to share about your ex. Yeah, so my

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>ex boyfriend used to ask me to take photos of

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>him just shirtless to see if he was progressing at

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the gym or if he looked quote fat. Now, I

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>think it was more awkward for me because I used

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to walk in on these little photo shoots. They'd happened

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>downstairs and I just walk into a shirtless They weren't

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>really photo shoots. He literally just stood there and I

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>snapped the photo on his phone. I didn't have any

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of these photos. And another awkward thing was he was

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 1>fanatical about practicing his golf swing, which was so annoying.

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>You'd be at the shops and he'd be practicing that

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>stupid like squat pose and the swing back, and sometimes

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd have to film that and it was just so awkward.

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>It just I didn't want to be involved. It made

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>me feel uncomfortable. This has actually made me think of

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>another awkward thing that my ex used to do. But

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't actually implicated in it, but I would be

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>embarrassed because after every meal he would get his napkin and.

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Blow his nose. And this would happen obviously at.

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Family dinner and one time he blew his nose into

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a material napkin as well.

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 2>That is so disgusting.

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not a bloody hanky actually, but you kind of

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>are implicated because you're with him, do you know what

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean? It comes across badly on you. What about

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>when my ex boyfriend, I think it was when we

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>used to go to Cottonon to buy stuff and what do.

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 2>You mean used to Cottonon's great?

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know it's great, but I had somehow got

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>him into cotton and he used to buy like expensive

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff and then he really loved cotton On. And I

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>remember being in the Chaine rooms because they were muni

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 1>sex and he would like parade out of them, and

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I'd be in there just like you know, I hate

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>those people that parade around in their outfits in front

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of the mirror.

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 2>It would just be so awkward.

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>That's very unusual for a boy though, because usually they

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>don't like to try anything, or they'd just be like, yep, that's.

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Large as mine. That kind of reminds me.

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember when you were younger and used to

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>go shopping with your mum and then Mum would always

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>make you try on the clothes and like do a

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>little fashion parade for dad. And when you're at home, Yeah,

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Dad wouldn't give a shit what was going on now,

0:33:57.560 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 1>But Dad now does that. So Dad's really got into

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>online shopping, so at family dinner he'll come down and

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>show his purchases.

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 2>It's so cute.

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, if your partner does anything awkward and you're somewhat involved, implicating,

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 4>implicated in that awkwardness, we'd love it if you could

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:15.879
<v Speaker 4>share it in our podcast community, so you can find

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 4>us that outspoken podcast community on Facebook.

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it would be really nice to hear that other

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 1>poor people have been implicated in these embarrassing tasks. And

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that's not just me now, I think that's all we

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 1>have time for. Thank you so much for joining us

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>for today's episode. If you have enjoyed, it would be

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:33.919
<v Speaker 1>great if you could share a screenshot of where you're

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>listening from on your Instagram story and tag us out Outspoken, Underscore,

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the Underscore Podcast. It would also be great if you

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>could leave us a review. It really helps us get

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 1>into the charts and more people listening. And make sure

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 1>that you are subscribed because that way you know when

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>our latest episodes will drop.