WEBVTT - Why Most AI Rollouts Fail (And How to Make Sure Yours Doesn't)

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Most AI rollouts looks something like this, a big announcement,

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>lots of enthusiasm, and a few months later things have

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>gone one of two ways, either barely anyone's using the tools,

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>or everyone's using them to churn out AI slop. Sometimes

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>both and leadless to say, the huge investment in licenses

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't paying off. Now, for today's episode, we are releasing

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a recording from a live webinar Neo and I ran

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>recently on why AI rollouts fail and how to set

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 1>yours up for success. We get into why these problems

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>are happening, including the surprising research on how little time

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>AI is actually saving most people, the training goes that

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>does move the dial, and the question every leadership team

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>needs to answer before spending another dollar on licenses. Well,

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>let's jump in by starting with the biggest problem we

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>are seeing organizations making Welcome to how IAI with me

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Amantha Imba and Neo Applin, head of Inventium AI.

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>Each episode we share one practical way to use AI

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>better at.

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Work and in life.

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>No fluff, no tech jargon, just things you can use

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>straight away. We are of course talking to you today

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>about AI rollouts and why we've seen a lot of

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>them fail and how we can actually make them work.

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>So to start with, you might be like, oh my god,

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>who are these randoms? Or maybe like you followed us

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>for years and you're like you need no introduction. But anyway,

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to assume that, like we're two random people,

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'll introduce myself first. So my name is Amantha

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Imber and with my initials, well, it just qualifies me

0:01:57.680 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to be.

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Talking about AI, right, So what more do I need? Anyway?

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Aside from that, I'm the founder of Inventium and Inventium

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>dot AI, which is our sister company where all we

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>do is help people with AI skills, building and rollouts

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and all that sort of great stuff. I was awarded

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 1>AI Consultant of the Year last year, so there we go.

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm award winning, so hey, you should probably trust me.

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Neo, who are you?

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm neo and matrix jokes going in here. So I've

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 3>been in it my whole career. I've been building stuff

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 3>for big companies, small companies, startup, scale ups and that

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 3>kind of stuff. But AI has been the biggest change

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 3>I've seen over the time. So AI is all I

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 3>do these days. I'm the head of AI and invent him.

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 3>AI and I trained companies on how to get the

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 3>best out of this, and I usually start at leadership

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 3>teams and boards and things like that and then go

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 3>throughout the rest of the company to be able to

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 3>implement AI awesome.

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 2>So together Neo and I and the team at.

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Inventium, we have worked with a lot of different organizations.

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 2>These are just a smattering.

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Who we have helped build AI capability, help them with

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>roll outs, all that sort of great stuff. So today,

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>like we're talking from firsthand on the ground experience plus

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>all the research that AI has of course helped us

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>get across.

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 2>So let's start. Let's start with a really big problem.

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Great, So first problem is actually top down. A lot

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 3>of leadership teams are saying this AI thing, Yeah, we'll

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 3>just get someone else to take care of that. So

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 3>it is a problem that needs to be solved at

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 3>the leadership level, and it needs to be a problem

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 3>that needs to be solved as far as here's what

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 3>we need to have for our company, but also needs

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 3>to be embodied by the leads as well. So one

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 3>of the challenges we've seen is the company might have

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 3>an AI policy, say, but everyone meets the policy and goes, oh, no,

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 3>I think you can use it. No, I can't use

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 3>it for that, And people get confused on what you

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 3>can actually use it for because the policy is not

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 3>specific about the types of data or the types of

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 3>use cases you can use it for. So one department

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 3>feels great to be using it, another apartment doesn't use

0:03:57.640 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 3>it much at all. That's one of the challenges there.

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 3>So the AI strategy is the first challenge, but within

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 3>that strategy challenge, the CEO needs to know what these

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 3>AI tools are, where the warts are, where they wanted

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 3>to go, where they think it's going to actually change

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 3>your company. And we found a lot of leadership teams

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 3>will say, oh, that AI thing, will get that done

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 3>by it department, but the CEO themselves don't use it.

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 3>They don't get their leadership team to use it, so

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:27.359
<v Speaker 3>everyone else in the company is a bit scared to

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 3>use it as well. I even had one lead who

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 3>said every time anyone walked behind them, if they had

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 3>AI opened on their laptop, they'd all tab out of it,

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 3>which is an absolute wrong way to do it. You

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 3>should be saying this is how I've used AI, and

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 3>you should be able to use it in these kind

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 3>of ways too, So we're going to walk the talk

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 3>here with AI. Otherwise a whole bunch of your staff

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 3>are going to be too scared to use the damn thing.

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Now, let's move on to another problem near I know

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you are seeing this a lot as am I.

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 3>Yep, Absolutely, buy the licenses, go right ahead. But you've

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 3>got to be able to train your people on how

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 3>to use these things. Where is it twenty thirty bucks

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 3>a month per user? A few times that buy your workforce.

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 3>This is not a cheap investment, but you can get

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot of this back. We think we get a

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 3>hell of a lot more than that back return on

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 3>investment for us and the people we train. So thirty

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 3>bucks is actually pretty cheap for what you can get

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 3>out of AI and the people's time savings. But just

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 3>giving them AI and saying now go is actually going

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 3>to give you less productivity. What I mean by that

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 3>is you're going to get more people getting confused with it,

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 3>just writing big emails, creating AI slop. So you need

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 3>to be able to train people on how to use AI.

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Licenses alone is not going to solve the problem.

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the big promise with AI is that it's

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>meant to save us all time.

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 2>But when we look at the latest research.

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 1>Around is coming out of HBr, they found that the

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 1>average time saving is just like guess in your head

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>before I reveal this number, two point five percent, Like

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>that is nothing, And there are many reasons why this

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>time saving is not happening. But I mean, what we

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>are saying, particularly when you give people the licenses without training,

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is that you get this huge proliferation of volume of work,

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 1>and generally that work is slop. Like you will have people,

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, typing a prompt into AI, going write me

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a ten page report and here are my three bullet points,

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and then that report then gets distributed to people people

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>presumably have to read that report, or even worse, they're

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 1>putting that report into AI and going summarize this report

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 1>and they're getting back three completely different bullet points. And

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>then companies are like, ohy am, I not saving time.

0:06:55.279 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, next on our problem list. What we see

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>is a big problem in how companies are measuring the

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>ROI of their investment, which is obviously like you know,

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>really it's a decent sized investment. When you think about

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>licenses and training and doing this stuff properly.

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 2>And what we see a lot of companies doing, and.

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Particularly like I know, like on sales calls that I'll

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>be on, I'll be like, well, how's you know, how's

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>AIU is going?

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Like where are people at with adoption? And they'll go, oh, well,

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, we can see the x percentage of stuff

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 2>for logging in daily to their AI tool, and some

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 2>companies is a little bit more advanced, like they're measuring

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 2>token usage.

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>But the thing with this, this tells us nothing whether

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>people are logging on or not, Like they could be

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>logging on and creating slop and then logging off, Like

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that's not helping your company. So these vanity metrics are

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>not helping you. We need to think differently about the

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>metrics that you're using to go how much value is

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>AI actually giving us?

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, next to agents, Yeah.

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 3>That's another vantage metric we've seen as well. Some companies

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 3>are going great, we're getting more agents created, and we

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 3>want more agents created. So, just for those who don't know,

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 3>agents are effectively AI experts that do things for you

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 3>the same way every single time. So you might have

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 3>an agent that might create for you like a little

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 3>the way we create our briefing here, or it might

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 3>be an agent that does like a style guide checker,

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 3>or it might be an agent that helps you with

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 3>your email writing. Those kind of things. Everyone's building agents,

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 3>and that's great, really good to see. In fact, we

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 3>train people on how to build agents. But here's the thing.

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 3>If everyone in your company is building agents, you're going

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 3>to get one thing, which is a proliferation of agents.

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 3>And the other thing is my agent will work differently

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.319
<v Speaker 3>to your agent. And so what you're going to find

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 3>is that there'll be too many agents out there. They'll

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 3>all work a little bit different to each other. And

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people are building agents. Don't know how

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 3>to build these things, so they work the great way

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 3>every single time. And so it might work great for

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 3>me when I use it, when I give it to you,

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 3>you might use work different because you use different words

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.839
<v Speaker 3>when you created your agent. So those kind of problems.

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 3>The other problem is, because we've got so many agents

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 3>being created, no one's actually looking after the agent. Who

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 3>owns that agent? If it needs to be updated or changed?

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Who owns that? How do I find that within my organization?

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 3>And so what we've actually got is a whole bunch

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 3>of agents out there floating around that may or may

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 3>not be giving value to the company. The other thing

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 3>is we're going to have a whole bunch of legacy problems.

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Like if I'm got this old agent, if anyone hasn't

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 3>used it in two months, can I delete it? If

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 3>I do delete it, does that break someone's workflow? I

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 3>don't know, because all these agents are just been thrown around.

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 3>It's one of the big problems we've got. So agents

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 3>are great, but too many agents not done particularly well.

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 3>Isn't innovation. It actually is more confusing than anything else.

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>And interestingly, like on the topic of vanity metrics, I

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>certainly hear this a lot, particularly when I'm speaking with

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>leaders who are looking at AI rollouts, and they'd be like, yeah, yeah,

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I've got like heaps of people they're bill agents. And

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I always wonder, hmm, what do you mean by that,

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>because like, there's good agent building and there's crap agent building.

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>If you've spent maybe like five or ten minutes like

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.839
<v Speaker 1>putting a system prompt into like agents on Copilot or

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:20.599
<v Speaker 1>a GPT on GPT, and then you're like, Bam, agent created,

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>it's probably not the best agent because like Neo.

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 2>How long do you take to build an agent?

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Typically half a day a day. Yeah, and that's because

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm building it, I'm refining it, I'm testing it, I'm

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 3>trying to break it. I'm giving it different inputs, different

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 3>outputs need to be put in. I need to make

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 3>sure that this works reliably for me and everyone else

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 3>I give it to every single time. And the other

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 3>thing is I then need to manage and version control

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 3>my agents because I'm going to come back to these

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 3>ones when the engine changes, when it goes from chetpt

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 3>five point three to five point four sometimes day break.

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Same thing with Copilot and all the others. So yeah,

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 3>agents do take time to build correctly.

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, folks at your workplace, who's working in an

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>organization where like there's a bit of a vibe that like, oh,

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>is AI going.

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 2>To replace us?

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Like just give us like a thumbs up if that

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>is your organization.

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I can see LA lots of them's going up now.

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I question, like, why would anyone adopt a

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>tool that they think is there to replace them? This

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>is a culture problem that very much needs to be

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>managed from the top, because you know, if I'm working

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in an organization, I'm like, Oh, I think AI is

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>going to replace me? How excited am I going to

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 1>be to use the technology and really embrace it?

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Probably not much at all. Now. The final big.

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Problem that we're going to talk about before we get

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>into solutions and then we'll get into your questions is

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>brain fry. So I know that this has kind of

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>been headlines in AI news.

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 2>If you're like us.

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Inclined and like just you know, follow this stuff every

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>single day. Brain fry was something that I was really

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 1>awesome pair of research and published in HBr, led by

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>this amazing researcher Gabrielle Obrezen Kellerman, who I've actually had

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>on how I.

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Work a couple of times. But brain fry is what happens.

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm curious as to anyone that has experience to this.

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>When you have got multiple let's call them, like, you know,

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>multiple AI tabs tasks going on at the same time.

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you know, you asked chat GPT to do one

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>thing and then you've opened up another tab and you've

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>got it working on another task and then another. And

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>this is how a lot of people are working with AI,

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and people are getting to the end of the day,

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 1>and it's different from burnout. They are feeling like their

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>brain is fried, like they have intense cognitive fatigue and

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>not surprisingly, like when we are fatigued like that, it

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>causes us to make more errors. It causes us to

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously produce like lower quality work. It is not good

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>for the output we are delivering in our job. So

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>different to burn out, which is a little bit more

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:05.079
<v Speaker 1>emotional and some other aspects. But AI brain fright is

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a really big problem. I don't know, you know, if

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>people have started to experience that. I know, I when

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I read that research, I'm like, oh my gosh, I

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>am feeling that.

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.719
<v Speaker 2>I feel like the way I work with AI.

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I am context switching because, like god forbid, I

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>have to wait, you know, thirty or sixty seconds for

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the AI to you know, be in like proper thinking

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>votes and vasually takes some time to think about what

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm asking it to do.

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, you've probably experienced brain for as well.

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 3>The other part of it also is that that constant checking,

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 3>like is that thing that it's given me good? Is

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 3>it actually correct? And you're checking your changing your job

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 3>from being a creator of email or document whatever to

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 3>being effectively a boss and a checker and a policy

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 3>and a reviewer and all those kind of things. And

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 3>you're constantly vigilant as well as constantly between tabs and

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 3>tasks and things you got to do and things you

0:13:57.320 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 3>got to check. So it's a real thing.

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.319
<v Speaker 2>So's that's a few problems.

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>When Nao and I were preparing for this, were like,

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we listed about twenty problems that we're seeing all the time,

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and we just like got the top ones that you know,

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming that you can probably relate to at least

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>one of those.

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 2>So let's get into solution mode. And again, there's so

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 2>much that.

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>We could talk about here, but we've just you know,

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>picked out a few.

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Now I am curious, particularly.

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>For people that are sitting on a senior leadership team,

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>whether you can answer this question. So before you spend

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a dollar on AI. Finished this sentence, we are using AI.

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Two.

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, this is this is your why why you're doing AI.

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>And a reason is not because well everyone's doing AI,

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>like that's the thing that you do. It's not a reason.

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>It's so it's a reason. I guess it's not a

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>compelling one, no great one. So you need to be

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>clear on your why, because everything else when it comes

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to your AI strategy will follow.

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Right doing AI to you free up time.

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>To really innovate, to service your customers better to maybe

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>let your staff work god for be like a thirty

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>eight hour week.

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 2>So be really clear on your why. Now another solution near.

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 3>We'll have to mention this one earlier, which is we

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 3>often start with and I encourage you start with the

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 3>senior leadership team because that dovetails into the why, but

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 3>also dovetails into the leadership and what we can do

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 3>as an organization with AI, because the finance lead will

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 3>know how they could implement it in finance, the operations likewise,

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 3>et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. So if those leads

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 3>don't understand AI, then there's pretty much no chance that

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 3>they'll be able to lead their teams to be able

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 3>to use this effectively. So we often start there at

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 3>de Lasia teams. Sometimes we start a board, sometimes board

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 3>and leadership team, those kind of things, because what we're

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 3>finding is that the trailblazing leaders are spending up to

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 3>eight hours a week just continually working on AI and

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 3>working with their teams on AI to make sure that

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be implemented, so it's upskilling themselves, but

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 3>also working with their teams to actually see how it's

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 3>being used at the coal face as well. So the

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 3>leaders using it in their own routines does a couple

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 3>of things. One is keeps them up to date, rather

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 3>than being the Ivory Tower leader who doesn't really know

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 3>about the AI but thinks it's a great idea. Instead,

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 3>they're actually embodying that and they're showing their teams and

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 3>everyone below them. Here's how I'm using it. You should

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 3>be using it too.

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think neo because you're like you spent your

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>entire career in it and tech like you have seen

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>many organizations go through digital transformations, like ALI is really

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>different here, and I'm keen to know because like previously,

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a digital transformation, it's like you just delegate that and.

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 3>CEO of a medium sized company if you've got a

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 3>new CRM, like a customer relationship management software, so like

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Salesforce or something like that, where we've got our sales

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 3>and our deals and our products and all those kind

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 3>of things in there. Traditionally, it was get the it

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 3>to department to go and buy it the IT department

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 3>would then buy it, they'd implement it. They do a

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 3>little bit of training for everyone, and then the training

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 3>is done a couple of handholds with a couple of people,

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 3>a couple of manuals there, and then it's sorted. So

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 3>eighty percent of the work is about just putting the

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 3>software in. II is really different because most of the

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 3>work is actually with the training and embodying that within

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 3>your workday. But also this thing changes. This AI thing

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 3>is continually evolving, so it's not a one and done

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:35.199
<v Speaker 3>training problem. It's actually an ongoing training thing. And so

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 3>if the leads aren't keeping that ongoing themselves, they've got

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 3>no hope of being able to lead that for the

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 3>rest of the organization.

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Now on the topic of training, neo, what should we do?

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>And we're a comfort like you know, because we see

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bad training. We're often bought into fixed

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>training that was not particularly effective.

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, what tell it? Tell us about this?

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:55.959
<v Speaker 3>A lot of the training, this part of that delegation thing.

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 3>A lot of the leaders are delegating to one department.

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 3>They're saying it this is yours to manage and roll out,

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.719
<v Speaker 3>or they're saying HR it's a learning and development thing,

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 3>so Hi, you're going to roll this thing out. It's

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 3>not just one department to do. And what we find

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 3>is a lot of the training that happens and sometimes

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:15.120
<v Speaker 3>is with the bigger providers as well. They're very much

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 3>based on features. So here, click this button, you can

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 3>do this, you can do it. Here's deep research, you

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 3>can click that and do some things. But they're not

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 3>showing people why they use it to how they can

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 3>put it in their day job to be actually able

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 3>to change the way they work. So being taught a

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 3>whole bunch of features is great, but not knowing how

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 3>I can improve my day job, improve my outputs, my clients,

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 3>my customers, my internal stakeholders. That's where people get stuck.

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 3>And we find a lot of teams get already trained

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 3>on the features, and then there's not the kind of

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 3>traction that people are seeing who are wanting to see.

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 3>They'll see people are using emails. That's really common. You

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 3>don't need to be trained to use emails, and so

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 3>these get lots of emails and lots of big emails,

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 3>but they're not actually getting better work done. And so

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 3>what we recommend is people train to tasks, not to features.

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 3>So initially there's going to be some kind of acclimation

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.679
<v Speaker 3>here's what the buttons are and whatnot, But then quickly

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 3>it really shu you go into familiarity of the tool

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 3>and how that's going to help me a as a worker,

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 3>and so I really go to tasks that people do

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 3>and particularly if you can then get it to be

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 3>embedded with your workflows as well. So what we found

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 3>is there's actually a bit of a threshold with training

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 3>with different organizations, the researchers out there and saying that

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 3>there's a minimum viable training amounts. They call it the

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 3>minimum dose if you'd like, and it's actually five hours

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 3>of hands on training. So this is not read a manual.

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 3>It's not come to a lunch and learn and watch

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 3>someone do it. It's training where people are being taught

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 3>their features and how to use that, but also taught

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 3>how to put that within their day job and practicing

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 3>that minimum dose five hours. But those companies that are

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 3>actually getting benefits out of it, they're training up to

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 3>eighty hours a year. So that's not just here's what

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 3>the feature is. It's like, let's talk about your workflow.

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Let's see how we can build AI into those workflows.

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Let's practice these things and building an agent and then

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 3>sharing it and then tweaking it and changing it, and

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 3>let's use different scenarios here, those kind of things. Yeah,

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 3>they take some time to sit down with those those people.

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 3>You've got change champions, you might have external providers like us,

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 3>but that's where the benefit really comes in.

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 1>And if we look at that research that Nio just

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that eighty hours a week training is like a

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 1>great dose to aim for in the research that showed

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>people got back fourteen hours per week terms every week

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:34.919
<v Speaker 1>in terms of time saving.

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 2>So if you're like going, I am.

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to like do some a train and do

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>like a one hour lunch and learn and like.

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Hope for the best.

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Just like think about that research and any research that

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned, just like hit us up. We'll share links

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>with you. Okay, dooksys. So quite often.

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Again, when I'm in meetings.

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>With various leaders is they'll be like, oh, yeah, you know,

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 1>we're just we're just you know, rolling out the licenses

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:03.439
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, you know, give us a few months to

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>do that and then you know, we'll we'll get you

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>guys into do training and that that scares me. I mean,

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we've got we've got plenty of works, so that's totally fine.

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>But what scares me is if you've got people with

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>licenses like free or paid. Obviously paid is better ACTU

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you can do more stuff, and then there's a real

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>lag between when people have access to the tool and

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 1>when they're getting trained in the tool. To me, like

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>my organizational psychologist, habit change brain goes, oh man, that's

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time to set some really bad habits

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and also to produce a lot of AI slop that

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to reduce productivity, not increase productivity. And interestingly,

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 1>some other research that Neil and I have come across

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>has found that people with AI I think there's something

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>like over one hundred percent increase in the amount of

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>emails that they're sending. And that is because it's now

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 1>super easy to write an e like there's going to

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>be a crap email if there's been no like human

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:08.159
<v Speaker 1>judgment or involvement in that email other than write this

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>email with these three messages like that is slowing people down.

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>So make sure that do try to time the training

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:22.439
<v Speaker 1>very close to when people have the licenses to reduce

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>bad habits forming and a proliferation proliferation. I think I

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>said that right of aislot. Okay, neo, what's this one about?

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's on literacy first, so maybe there's a step

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 3>prior to that, but really it's about first focus on

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 3>here's what the talking do and he hey, can actually

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 3>get it to help you to challenge your thinking and

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 3>use it as a buddy or an expert rather than

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 3>just use your slave, which is a lot of people

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 3>like write me the email that kind of stuff. But yeah,

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 3>absolutely focus on that literacy first and get that good

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 3>baseline knowledge of how it can fit into mind day

0:22:56.720 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 3>and help me. Then the benefits really come into leverage,

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 3>which is one of my workflows. How can it help

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 3>fit into my workflow? How can it speed up that

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 3>thing that I do that annoys and the crap out

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 3>of me? How do I get AI to help me

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:13.120
<v Speaker 3>with that or that big report that I do. Rather

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 3>than doing one a month because it's so big, maybe

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 3>I can do five a month because we're using AI

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 3>so we can get better insights on our customers or

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 3>the ones that I love is how do we customize

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 3>some of these things so rather than every customer, every client,

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.360
<v Speaker 3>every department getting the same response. How do we get

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 3>AI to customize these things for people? So, but first

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.239
<v Speaker 3>it really depends on that literacy part. So I'll put

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 3>it a little diagram here. So here's where a lot

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 3>of people start, just at access. So that's where here

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 3>take co pilot. There's a common one of companies get

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 3>and go for it and people have got it and

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:51.360
<v Speaker 3>they think, yep, AI is now done. We've got our

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 3>it guy. He's pretty good at AI, I understand, and

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 3>our it guy is going to show people how to

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 3>do it while I have a luncheon len. That's great. Done,

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 3>that's not bad. It's not a bad start. But really

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 3>it's about then giving people the tools and showing them

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 3>with buttons to bress and things like that. You're not

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 3>going to get any business benefit there, but it's required, right.

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 3>You need to give people licenses, you need to give

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:15.719
<v Speaker 3>them their people access, and you need to tell them

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 3>what these things are. We can certainly help with that,

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 3>but you can do that as well. But the benefits

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 3>really start coming in at this next stage, and that's

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 3>the literacy thing. Now you'll notice here this isn't a box.

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 3>This is a box with an arrow. The reason for

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 3>that is this literacy thing is now an ongoing challenge.

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 3>Like the AI you're using now is the worst AI

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 3>you're going to use for the rest of your life.

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 3>It is going to continue to change, not just with feature.

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 3>It's going to get smarter, it's going to be able

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 3>to be plugged into more systems and all those kind

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 3>of things. So the literacy part will have to change

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 3>over time. This is an ongoing thing that people need

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 3>to be involved in. But certainly get people up to

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 3>speed with what the tools are, how they work, how

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 3>they think, how they hallucinate from time to time, how

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 3>to best work with them so you get fewer hallucinations,

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 3>how you can fit it anyr work day, all of

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 3>those kind of things, and so that literacy is there

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 3>as a baseline for everything that comes next. From there,

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 3>we really see those kind of two things, and the

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 3>first is I'm calling an individual leverage, which is how

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 3>do I get it to help me in my day job?

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Knowing what I do, and I've then got some great

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 3>literacy on how I can use AI to do that.

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 3>Then I can start building things like agents. I can

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 3>start building workflows and fitting how putting it into my

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 3>workday and getting some benefit out of that. And the

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 3>other key on this one is actually sharing it with

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 3>your team as well, so making sure that individuals know

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 3>how to get the best out of this tool and

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 3>know how to look after these things that they're built

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 3>as well, so we don't just get old agents that

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 3>kind of work, that kind of don't work, and processes

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 3>and things like that half broken. So that individual leverage

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 3>is the first next step. And then after that, what

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 3>we generally find and what we recommend and do help

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 3>companies with is that organizational leverage, which is we have

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 3>this workflow, how do we get AI to help that?

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 3>And the organization and individual leverage often starts with I'm

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 3>doing this thing, how do I get AI to help

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 3>me do this thing? In the same way just a

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 3>bit different. The companies that are really going ahead, they're

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 3>the ones who are saying, now I've got AI, how

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 3>do I re envisage this workflow? How do I really

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 3>re envisage the inputs the outputs that we're getting from

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 3>these How do I actually move the company's dial rather

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 3>than just shove AI into a step? How do I say,

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 3>now I've got this an amazing tool. How do I change

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 3>the way we're delivering so it's more effective, more productive,

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 3>those kind of things, and that's where the big benefits

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 3>come from.

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 2>And just on that. It's not just about.

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Finding people who are really really good at AI or

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 1>really heavy users. It's about training people or finding people

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>that think in terms of workflow, like like what is

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 1>the process? How do I unpack a process step by step?

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 2>How do I know what AI can do and what

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 2>it can't do?

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Because what Neo and I find and the rest of

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the team when we're working with organizations on this, there's

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people that think AI is magic, like

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it can create high quality data where no data exists,

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not that good. So it's really important that like

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>when we're looking at individual leverage for individual workflows and

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>organization or team or function workflows, is that these people

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:27.199
<v Speaker 1>not only no AI, but they also think like a

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>workflow designer to get the best stuff. And like, obviously

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you know whereby us we're do great training on this,

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>but you just need to make sure you've got that

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:35.920
<v Speaker 1>skill set in mind.

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 2>It's not just about knowing AI, and.

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Often we find that it's in different people. So you

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 3>might have the IT person of helping out, and you

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 3>might have someone who's like a business analyst kind of

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 3>processing kind of person helping out. And you might also

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 3>have someone who's like that into the SME expert who

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 3>knows their organizational lens and the three of those people

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 3>are often needed to pull in the needs and the

0:27:57.520 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 3>goods all those kind of things. But yeah, it's not

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.880
<v Speaker 3>they get one person to do it or a self serve,

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 3>particularly without training, because then you're going to get a

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 3>lot of broken processes and upset customers and things like that.

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, absolutely you need to be a whole organization

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 3>behind this. And you'll also see this diagram and really

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 3>provi should go on forever because this is now an

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 3>ongoing challenge, so it's not once again. It's not a

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 3>one and done. You might have improved this process, but

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 3>the tools will change over time and so we need

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 3>to continue revise and look at these to see if

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 3>we need to optimize them again.

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:33.679
<v Speaker 1>Okay, one more solution before we go into questions.

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 2>So AI will give people their time.

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Back, but guess what happens if you don't have a

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>plan for where that time goes.

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 2>They're going to fill it with more work.

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's probably going to lead to brain fry because

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>generally we're filling it with like deeper, more cognitively intense work,

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>particularly when we're reviewing AI's output, which is now a

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>large part of our day that requires vigilance and critical

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking and stuff that requires more brain power than the

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>task that we're outsourcing to AI, which typically require a

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit less brain power. So this is really important.

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>So leaders need to really give some thought to this

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and communicate it, like, do you want people with all

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>these time savings that you're getting or are going to

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 1>get or have been promised? Like, do you want them

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>putting that towards innovation where previously they had no time?

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you want them putting it towards the customer and

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>learning more about the customer, speaking more with customers, trainer

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>up your customer satisfaction scores and net promotor scores? Do

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you want them putting it back into learning and development?

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Because I'm yet to meet an L and D professional

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>who's like, oh, people have so much time for learning

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>at our organization. Or do you want them putting it

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>into god forbid, work life balance? So crazy idea, So

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 1>be really thoughtful around that, because if you are not

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>people will just cram it with more work. Thanks so

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>much for listening. If you are in the middle of

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>an AI rollout and want some help getting it right,

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you can find us at Inventium dot ai.

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 2>We would love to chat. See you next time.

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>How i AI was hosted by me, Amantha Imber and

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Neo Applan. A big thank you to Martin Imber who

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>does our sound editing, and Jem Rubio for production support,

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and thank you to John Kilby who composed the theme music.