WEBVTT - What do Trump's tariffs mean for Australia?

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Already and this is the daily This is the daily.

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Ohs oh, now it makes sense.

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Good morning and welcome to the Daily OS. It's Thursday,

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 3>the thirteenth of March.

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm emma, I'm billy.

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 3>Yesterday, most of us here in Australia woke up to

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 3>the news that US President Donald Trump is going ahead

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 3>with harsh tariffs on all countries who import their goods to.

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 1>The US, with no exceptions.

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:37.239
<v Speaker 3>It comes after months of uncertainty and efforts by the

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Australian government to negotiate an exemption on Ossie steel and aluminium. However,

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 3>the twenty five percent import tax officially came into effect

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 3>yesterday afternoon, and that came after what was already a

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 3>tumultuous week for the US economy and global markets, after

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump refused to rule out.

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>The possibility of a US recession.

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.639
<v Speaker 3>Today, today we are going to explain everything you need

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 3>to know about what's going on with the US economy

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 3>and these tariffs.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 2>This week, okay, and so as you've set up for us,

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 2>it has been a big week for the economy, especially

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 2>for the share market. There were big drops on Wall

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Street in the US and we also felt that here

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 2>in Australia. Do you want to just take us back

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 2>to the weekend when this kind of all started to unravel.

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 2>What happened?

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So it all started on Sunday night when Donald

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 3>Trump did an interview with Fox News, the US news outlet,

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:39.680
<v Speaker 3>and that kind of triggered this first wave of volatility

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 3>that we saw this week. He was asked directly by

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 3>a Fox reporter if he's expecting the US to enter

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 3>a recession this year, and here's what he said.

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I hate to predict things like that.

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 2>There is a period of transition because what we're doing

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 2>is very big. Okay, So he refused to rule out

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 2>the possibility of a recession, refuse to kind of speculate

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 2>whether or not there would be one. And obviously a

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of people were watching that hoping that he would

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 2>say with certainty that there wouldn't be one. He didn't

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 2>do that. Do I just give us a quick refresher though,

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 2>on what exactly is a recession?

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So when you hear the term recession, it's referring

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 3>to a period of economic decline, which is usually marked

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 3>by things like reduced consumer spending and job losses. So

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 3>us the customers spending less money, and more unemployed people.

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 3>Most economists do have a clear definition for recession, and

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 3>that includes there being two consecutive three month periods or

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 3>quarters of a country's gross domestic product going backwards. So

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 3>there are a number of key indicators that can tell

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 3>us a recession is around the corner, and those indicators

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 3>are things like market volatility, consumer attitudes, widespread unemployment, and

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 3>increased rates of people not being able to pay back

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 3>there credit card bills or their home loans. So when

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 3>all of those things are bubbling away, that's a pretty

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 3>good indication that we're headed for a recession.

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so obviously not great.

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Not what anyone wants is their cause for concern that

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 2>there could be a recession in the US.

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 3>So interestingly, most indicators on the US economy actually look

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:27.559
<v Speaker 3>pretty strong when we consider those kind of key recession indicators.

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 3>So hiring and job creation rates are looking good. Economists

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 3>aren't worried about those things. There are some indicators though,

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 3>that there could be an increase in kind of consumer pessimism.

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 3>So consumer confidence figures have dropped, stock markets have been fluctuating,

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 3>and that could all lead to less spending, and that's

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 3>something that could result in recession, but a number of

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 3>major financial institutions release probability ratings to give us an

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 3>indication on what they're experts and what their analysis says

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 3>about the likelihood of a recession. And we've seen some

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 3>reevaluated predictions out of the US. So, for example, JP

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Morgan now believes a recession is forty percent likely and

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Goldman Sachs puts it at a twenty percent chance for

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 3>the US.

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Right, And there's also all of this added uncertainty with

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 2>the tarifsts that we'll get into. Is that also kind

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 2>of why people are speculating, because with uncertainty comes speculation

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 2>that we don't know obviously what's going to happen.

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, whenever there is financial uncertainty insecurity about the future,

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 3>when people don't feel confident about the road ahead, that

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 3>can lead to these kind of big drops on stock markets.

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.599
<v Speaker 3>People panic, they might sell their shares. The fluctuations kind

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 3>of add to these conversations around oh dear or something

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 3>bigger around the corner.

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 2>And that's kind of what happened right after this interview

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 2>with Fox right exactly.

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 3>So stock markets pretty much immediately crashed, firstly in the US,

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 3>but then around the world. In including here in Australia.

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 3>So on Tuesday, the ASX plummeted by more than fifty

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars and that was directly linked to uncertainty over

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 3>the US economy, all from you know, a few words

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 3>said by the president of the world's largest economy. Tech

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 3>stocks saw the biggest drops, and that was in the

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 3>US as well as here on the ASX and Tesla

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 3>stocks interestingly slipped by fifteen percent on Monday, and shares

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 3>in the ev company, the Elon Musk owned company, have

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:35.479
<v Speaker 3>actually halved in value since December, so pretty consistent downturn

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 3>for a company like Tesla.

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:41.359
<v Speaker 2>And fun fact, after this terrible drop from Tesla on

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 2>the share market, Trump and Elon Masks stood in front

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 2>of the White House with their Tesla cars trying to

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of do this pr stunt to say, you know, look,

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 2>the President is still using Tesla's so so should.

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.239
<v Speaker 1>All of us. Apparently was still going strong.

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 2>They say, okay, So this fluctuation across stock markets is

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 2>one part of the story. But there's this other huge

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 2>policy from the Trump administration that we have flagged, and

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 2>it's one we have been talking about for quite a

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 2>while now. Since Trump became the president, and that is tariffs.

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to first remind us what that term means?

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>What are tariffs? Yes?

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 3>So, put really simply, tariffs are a type of import tax.

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 3>So when foreign made goods are brought into another country,

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 3>they are subject to fees or duties. Those fees or

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 3>duties are known as tariffs. So governments might use tariffs

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 3>as a means to protect local manufacturing. So this is

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 3>because these taxes make imported goods more expensive.

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>So rather than absorb the cost of.

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Input fees on foreign goods, consumers might think, oh, I'll

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 3>buy a locally made product because it's cheaper or it

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have those taxes on it. The flip side of

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 3>that is, generally speaking, customers might not always have the

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 3>option to purchase domestic goods. You know, depending on what

0:06:57.760 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 3>those goods are, they might not be a local market

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 3>and you know, that means that they will usually end

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 3>up being the hardest hit by tariffs. Customers usually end

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 3>up absorbing them. So specifically, these US tariffs could make

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 3>things more expensive for American consumers. They might not necessarily

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 3>impact Australian exports immediately unless demand for goods ends up

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 3>shifting that is more concerning, but we can get into

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 3>the specifics of that a little bit later.

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So my understanding is that the thinking behind Trump

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 2>introducing these tariffs is for more things to be made

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 2>in the US. He basically wants everything to be made

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 2>in the US and for customers to only be buying

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 2>things that were made in the US.

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Yes, he said in strong terms that he wants manufacturers

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 3>to bring their manufacturing businesses to US shores to make

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 3>those products there in America. Interestingly, as well, tariffs are

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 3>often used to sanction other countries as a sort of

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 3>political device in trade wars, and we have seen that

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 3>play out with the US and China and heavy tariffs

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 3>that it's imposed on them for different reasons than that

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 3>kind of local manufacturing angle.

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 2>And so what else you just mentioned China? I know

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 2>there were also ones on Canada and Mexico. What else

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 2>has happened in the lead up to this week before

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 2>we get into what actually has happened this week.

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So since Trump was elected in November, he was

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 3>inaugurated in January, and even before then, he has been

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 3>promising sweeping import tariffs aimed at, like we've said, bolstering

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 3>US manufacturing also aimed at strengthening the US border. This

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 3>was a policy area that he was really focused on

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 3>in his first term as president, so it's not a

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 3>particularly shocking policy area for Trump to be so heavily

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 3>invested in. But in the first few weeks off his

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 3>current term, Trump did announce a number of tariffs which

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 3>included goods imported from Mexico and Canada, and that had

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 3>to do with managing the US borders. We heard a

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of commentary at the time about illegal drug importations,

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 3>illegal immigration. But then Trump also announced tariffs against China.

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 3>The Mexico Canada tariffs, there was a lot of stop start,

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 3>back and forth. There were pauses, negotiations about you know

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 3>how they would end up working, but they did recently

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 3>come into effect. And then last month Trump announced that

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.119
<v Speaker 3>the US would impose twenty five percent tariffs on imported

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 3>steel and aluminium. That would be on all countries that

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 3>import those products to the US and that includes Australia.

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:38.239
<v Speaker 3>Now since then, Australia has been really focused on avoiding

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 3>that specific tariff.

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 2>And steel and aluminium in Australia is really important. It's

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 2>one of our biggest exports. Do you want to just

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 2>explain more kind of the importance of steel and aluminium

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:52.839
<v Speaker 2>to Australia, because it's not something that we learn about,

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 2>really yeah, no, and as you study it.

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 3>Unless you study it, unless you work in the field

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.040
<v Speaker 3>of steel and aluminium, or aluminum.

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>As America would call it.

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Australia does export hundreds of millions of dollars of steel

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 3>and aluminium.

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 1>To the US every year.

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 3>Steel is used in things like you know, car manufacturing,

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 3>heavy industries, construction, and aluminium is used also in car

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 3>manufacturing as well as in household items pots, pans, foil,

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 3>so they're kind of very versatile exports. According to government data,

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 3>the US was the world's second largest steel importer in

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three, and its aluminium imports have actually increased

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 3>by twenty five percent since twenty fifteen. Now, last year,

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 3>the US imported around four hundred million US dollars of

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Australian steel and around two hundred and seventy million dollars

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 3>of Australian aluminium. That might sound like a lot of money,

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 3>but actually in the broader context of the US, Australia

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 3>isn't a major exporter of aluminium to America Compared to

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 3>other trading partners. So, for example, in the year of February,

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 3>the US imported three million tons of aluminium from Canada

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 3>and three hundred and fifty thousand tons from the UAE.

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Australia exported ninety thousand tons during that time, So overall

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 3>about ten percent of our steel and aluminium goes to America.

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 3>So it's not nothing, but there are other markets and

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 3>other ways to kind of diversify our exports of those goods.

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So Trump announced these tariffs. Then Anthony Albanesi, Australia's

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:30.559
<v Speaker 2>Prime minister, has a call with Trump to try to

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 2>see if Australia specifically can get an exemption. Albanzi was

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 2>quite positive about that call. But what has happened since

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 2>that has meant that there will now be these tariffs

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 2>and there will be no exemption.

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So you might remember that phone call, and President

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Trump had spoken to US media said that he thought

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Albanzi was a very nice man, that the exemption for

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Australia was under consideration. Also at that time, Trump told

0:11:57.600 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 3>reporters in the White House that Australia was one of

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:03.439
<v Speaker 3>the only countries where the US has a trade surplus.

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:07.439
<v Speaker 3>Now what that means is Australia buys more American goods

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 3>than the US buys from Australia. Trump signed a series

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 3>of executive orders last month following that call. He did

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 3>say no countries would be exempt, but he was asked

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 3>directly about Australia and said he was giving it great consideration. However,

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:25.679
<v Speaker 3>as we know, that has since fallen through and at

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 3>the time a senior trade advisor to Trump his name

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 3>is Pete Navarro, he had accused Australia of quote killing

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 3>the American aluminium market. Navarro was actually a key figure

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 3>in Trump's similar tariffs in twenty eighteen, and those are

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 3>the ones that former PM Malcolm Turnbull actually successfully negotiated

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 3>to avoid. But in short, it appears this time that

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Australia's efforts to secure an exemption now have seemingly failed.

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 3>So the White House confirmed on Tuesday that the tariffs

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 3>would be going ahead without exception. We heard from White

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 3>House spokeswoman Caroline Leave. She told the ABC that Trump

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 3>considered the request and considered against it. To use her words,

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 3>Peter Navarro, who worked with Trump and Turnbull in twenty eighteen,

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 3>he said that every country that was exempt from the

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 3>tariffs last time abused those exemptions. So speaking to the ABC,

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.959
<v Speaker 3>Navarro said, the lesson from the first Trump tariffs has

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 3>been quote is that exemptions to anybody a counterproductive. They

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 3>don't work for the American people. When we were kind

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 3>enough as a country to make those gestures to our friends,

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 3>he said, they bit the hand that fed them, and

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 3>that's not going to happen again.

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, those are pretty definitive words. We do know though that,

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, when we look at Mexico and Canada and

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 2>the tariffs that were meant to be introduced there, they

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 2>were briefly stopped. Like you said, there was that stop start,

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 2>So we do know that there is a possibility that

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Trump could change his mind.

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>But let's just.

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Say that these tariffs are here to stay. How would

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 2>it meaningfully impact Australia and what would the economic fallout be?

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's important to note that the initial

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 3>impact on local manufacturing would be minor, So all the

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 3>experts are telling us that the effect straightaway is going

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 3>to be pretty negligible. But as we discussed at the

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 3>start of the episode, tariffs are more likely going to

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 3>impact consumers on the other end, Uncertainty then kind of

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 3>comes from how other markets will react. So there are

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 3>sweeping tariffs on so many countries as we've discussed, and

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 3>bigger exporters like China might resort to a trade tactic

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 3>known as dumping. Now, this is when a product gets

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 3>exported to a foreign market at a lower price than

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 3>it costs domestically. So, for example, if an Aussie steel

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 3>manufacturer sells their stell to the US for less than

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 3>they charge Australian customers, part of this dumping also means

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 3>decreased demand in a market. So if demand for steel

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 3>in the US drops, some foreign businesses might flood other

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 3>markets like Australia with excess stock. That can lead to

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 3>more competition and that can have negative effects on local businesses.

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 3>The federal government actually has an Anti Dumping Commission aimed

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 3>at protecting local manufacturers, so there are some regulatory measures

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 3>in place.

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>But the other.

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Significant concern here is the potential for a global trade war.

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 3>The University of Sydney School of Economics put this better

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 3>than I could.

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>They posted an interesting explainer.

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 3>On this whole issue, which said a trade war quote

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 3>could disrupt supply chains and weaken manufacturing activity across East

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 3>and Southeast Asia. Given that Japan, Korea and China are

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 3>key export destinations for Australia, such disruptions could have significant

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 3>economic consequences. We've also spoken previously to economist Greg Jericho

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 3>and he's explained to The Daily I was before that

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 3>if the Chinese economy is doing poorly, then the Australian

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 3>economy generally follows suits. So unfortunately, we're in this kind

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 3>of place global or in this unique kind of Asia

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Pacific region, in this position unfortunately where if other big

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 3>key players like China, Japan, etc. Are hit or impacted,

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 3>then you know, we tend to also experience negative fallouts

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 3>in our own economy.

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 2>It's a real example of the globalized world that we

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 2>live in and the impact of globalization on economy. Exactly,

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 2>something happens to one country, it literally impacts all countries.

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 2>How has the Australian federal government responded to this news?

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 3>So we heard from Prime Minister Anthony Albanezi yesterday. He

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 3>did a press conference and addressed this decision by Trump.

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 3>He had very clear disappointment over that decision and here

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 3>is a bit of what he said.

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 4>Such a decision by the Trump administration is entirely unjustified.

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 4>Australia will continue working hard for a different outcome and

0:16:55.760 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 4>discussions with the Trump administration. Ongoing grafts and escalating trade

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 4>tensions are a form of economic self harm. They are

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 4>paid by the consumers. This is why Australia will not

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 4>be imposing reciprocal tariffs on the United States. Such a

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 4>course of action would only push up prices for Australian

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 4>consumers and increase inflation.

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 3>So from Albanese's words yesterday, we're expecting the government to

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 3>continue to put forward that very strong case for an exemption.

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 3>As Albanezi said, he also noted, quote we will continue

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 3>to point out that the United States interests are not

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 3>served by today's decision, and in an interview with Sky,

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the tariffs were quote not

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 3>the way to treat a friend and partner. So the

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 3>word from the Australian government really leaning into the kind

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 3>of alliance and the decades long friendship between the two

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 3>nations and what about the coalition So Billy, of course,

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 3>there is an election coming up. We are heading to

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 3>the polls sooner or later, and we're probably going to

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 3>hear a lot more about this over the coming weeks

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 3>from the Coalition, the Opposition has criticized Albanzi quite strongly

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 3>for how he's handled this tariff debacle and these negotiations.

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 3>They've kind of suggested that he didn't do enough, didn't

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 3>work hard enough with Trump, that he should have actually

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 3>flown to the White House for an in person.

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Discussion or negotiation.

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:23.360
<v Speaker 3>The Coalition has also called into question Kevin Rudd. Now

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 3>he is Australia's ambassador to the US. You might remember

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 3>there was a bit of politicking around whether or not

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 3>he was the right person for the job after some

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 3>old comments that he made that were very critical of

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 3>Trump emerged. Trump had sort of hit back at that

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 3>before he was elected, said that Kevin Rudd was nasty,

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 3>and the Coalition now we're kind of asking, well, is

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Rudd the right person to be representing Australia in

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 3>these discussions? He's our man on the ground. Is he

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 3>equipped to deal with the Trump administration? But Anthony Alberizi

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 3>backed in Rudd yesterday. During that address, the PM described

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 3>him as a quote very effective ambassador.

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 2>Such a complex topic. I think we got through a

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 2>lot today, a very effective podcast.

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, thank you for listening, if you're still awake, I

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 3>really appreciate it. Of course.

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 2>No, there's nothing that excites us small than economics a mare,

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 2>and thank you so much for listening to this episode

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 2>of The Daily os. We'll be back again this afternoon

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 2>with your evening headlines. Until then, have a great day.

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 2>My name is Lily Madden and I'm a proud Arunda

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Bungelung Chalcuttin woman from Gadighl Country. The Daily oz acknowledges

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on the lands of the

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Gadighl people and pays respect to all Aboriginal and Torres

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Strait Island and nations.

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>We pay our respects to the first peoples of these countries,

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>both past and present.