WEBVTT - Ciaran Flannery & Dan Brown: CLAREMONT: A KILLER AMONG US - EP & CREATIVE DIRECTOR

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:01.720
<v Speaker 1>It's in the news today, but it was actually on

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>TV Reload the podcast last week Airline. Welcome back guys

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to TV Reload. My name is Benjamin Norris, and on

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:11.039
<v Speaker 1>this podcast I go behind the scenes with the biggest

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>players in television. Each episode you will get a front

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>row seat with content makers like executive producers, writers, editors,

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and casting agents, plus the talent that we see on

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>our screens. TV Reload reloads the shows that you're currently

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>watching and gives you a better insight into our television

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>industry and our streaming services. Today on the podcast, I

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>have two guests joining me to discuss their extraordinary work

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:37.879
<v Speaker 1>on the two part series Clamont A Killer amongst Us,

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>which debuted last night on Network ten and concludes this

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>evening at seven point thirty. The series will be available

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>on ten Play and if you want to catch up

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>on this brilliant documentary, I do suggest you do so.

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I was lucky enough to preview this series and straight

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>away I lined up this chat with ten publicity. Dan

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Brown joins me from Joined Up Films. He is the

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>executive producer creative to rector on the series and his

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>insights today and how we managed to produce this series

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 1>with empathy and integrity is fascinating. He is joined by

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>network Executive producer at Network ten, Kieran Flannery, who shared

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Dan's vision for the story and should be really proud

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of the finished product because it is first class storytelling

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>in the genre of true crime. The story of the

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>Clamont murders rocked Western Australia for decades with no resolution

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and with many people aware of a killer walking amongst

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>their community. It is one of Australia's most notorious cases,

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and while we have the men behind bars, there's a

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>lot to discuss as the series unpacks DNA technology, the

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>police's dedication, and it also includes stories from the victims

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of these horrendous crimes. We will talk about the popularity

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of true crime and why it's currently a phenomenon, what

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of integrity was needed to tell the story properly,

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the decisions in what makes the final cut,

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and how they manage to get so many people to

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>be included in this series. However, let's get started with

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>today's guest. I'd like to welcome Dan Brown from Joined

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Up Films and Karen Flannery from Network ten to TV Reload.

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 2>I have to tell that story was the tricky bet.

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 2>We didn't want to just do a straight retelling of

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 2>the event.

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Today mark's the end of a dark chapter in its history.

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 2>But many questions from they unanswered.

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 3>In any true prime documentary about serial killings or murders,

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 3>of course, the victims and the families are massive focus,

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 3>and so they should be.

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>It all started decades agot. Young innocent women taken away

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>from their families are.

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Going to shock. I think there has to be a

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 3>really strong reason in your storytelling behind that.

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 2>How can he go thirty our years committing the most

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 2>painous crime. We had psychologists on hand to talk to

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 2>them to make sure that we were doing the right

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:52.679
<v Speaker 2>thing by them. These girls got plucked from the quietest,

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 2>most trusting areas in Australia. The bar has been raised.

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 2>You have to do these things well. They have to

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 2>be smart, They have to multi layers.

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Hi, guys, thank you so much for coming on the

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast and talking about Clamont a killer amongst us. We

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>do have two English accents here, so I'm going to

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 1>have to try and help the audience differentiate who I'm

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>talking to. But you know, we'll try and work it out.

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Would you like me to do another accent.

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 1>If you can do the accent convincingly and it's not distracting, No, no, no,

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 1>be yourself. We have Dan Brown from Joined Up Films.

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining us to talk about the Clamont Murders,

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>The Killer among Us, which did debut last night, and

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 1>we have a conclusion this evening on Network ten.

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh look, it's such a I'm so delighted that you're interested.

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, you spend a lot of time coming up

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 2>with these ideas and a lot of time crafting them,

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 2>and then you put them out in the world and

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 2>you hope that they do well. And you know, the

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 2>response we've had so far has been fantastic, and the

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 2>fact that you're picking up on all of the nuances

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 2>that we've really spent a lot of time crafting is

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 2>really gratifying. So thanks for having us.

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, this must have been under your skin for quite

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>some time and now people are finally getting to watch it.

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Are you keen to hear what people have to say

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>after sinking their teeth into the next part this evening?

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 2>You always put these films out with a sense of trepidation.

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 2>You hope that you've done the best that you can

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 2>and you know that it's going to be received well.

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 2>But it's been a long time. I think we've sort

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 2>of worked out maybe December twenty twenty is when we

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 2>went into paid development on this, so we started the

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 2>journey with ten around then. It took about a year

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 2>to you know before almost a year before it got

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 2>fully commissioned because we wanted to make sure we were

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 2>telling the right story for the right reasons. And then

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 2>it's you know, it's been we were at least six

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 2>seven months in the edits week after we'd filmed everything,

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 2>just really sort of crafting it. So it's been a

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of hard work.

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>We also have Kiaren Flannery from Network ten and you're

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 1>here to talk about your involvement. Hey, Benjamin how I

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>this story spans decades and has had Australians you know,

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>glued to all the twists and turns. Do you think

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that for audiences out there, what do you think that

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>they're going to learn from this retelling of the story.

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot in it, you know, with two ninety

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 3>minute episodes, it covers a lot of ground. But I

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 3>think the thing that sort of resonates the most for

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 3>me is really the human story of the investigators and

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 3>what they went through as well as I mean, in

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 3>any true crime documentary about serial killings or murders, of

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 3>course the victims and the families are massive focus, and

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 3>so they should be, and they are in this as well.

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 3>But I think the access that we had to the

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 3>investigators through WA Police was something that sets this documentary apart.

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 3>And I think often you ignore the human toll it

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 3>takes on the people who are trying to find a killer,

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 3>especially when they can't find him or her, And for

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 3>me that is I think that, yeah, that human face

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 3>on the investigators is something that people will take away.

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Did you know the story before you watch the documentary?

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>And we all know it to a certain extent, but

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not with the detail, do you know what I mean?

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, if you mentioned the Clamont murders, I

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>would know certain parts of it, but I absolutely didn't

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 1>know it was him, and so that was a revelation.

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 3>The variability of how much people know about the case

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 3>is huge, Like there are people who I think in

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 3>way everyone knows all about it, right, it's sort of

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 3>part of the discourse and almost popular culture over there.

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 3>But once you sort of get to the Eastern States.

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of it's variable. Some people know it really well,

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 3>some don't. And I think the way that Dan's team

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 3>told the story is actually really clever because it's they

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 3>assume that you don't know anything, which is good.

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 1>It's the best way that you can make a documentary

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>like this, though, I think, is to assume that the

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>audience doesn't know everything and to take them on a journey.

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think also having the time to do it

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>over two episodes was important.

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 2>There really was a lot to tell, and there was

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot of nuance, and that's really what we wanted

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.239
<v Speaker 2>to do was get to the heart of the emotion

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 2>of what it was like to be there, what it

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 2>was like to live through this, what it was like

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 2>to be one of the victims or the victim's family,

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 2>but also what it was like to be the police

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 2>who were investigating this, because you know, that's a pretty

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 2>teneteous effort to be able to solve this crime after

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 2>so long and there was so much pressure on their shoulders.

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 2>So to tell that story from a human perspective but

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 2>from all all department that was really the key, and

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 2>we wanted to be able to make this show and

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 2>be able to look at the families in the eye

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 2>and know that we had done this with dignity and

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 2>with respect, with empathy. You know, we spent a lot

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 2>of time crafting it, a lot of time in the

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 2>edits week, like, we held it back from going to

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 2>the network. I know, maybe a month, maybe two months,

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 2>a long time more than you know I've done on

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 2>anything else I reckon, because we just couldn't get this wrong.

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 2>It needed it was so important.

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 3>And you know, often when when when a production company

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 3>holds back from showing me something, it's normally not a

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 3>good thing. But in this instance, it was a really

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 3>really good thing, and it was great you know when

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 3>when and that extra time they took was well worth it.

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>You could tell that there was a lot of respect

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>for these people who had to talk about something that's

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the hardest thing that's ever happened to them in their life.

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 3>It's respect as well. It's respect for the surviving victims. Obviously,

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 3>the way they are treated is very respectful, and there's

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 3>respect for the families because it's not about pouring over

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 3>you know what it's like to lose someone close to you.

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 3>It's not kind of that kind of gratuitous pouring over history.

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 3>But I think there's a lot of respect and empathy

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 3>for the police in the way that Dan and the

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 3>team tackled it. You know, the police don't shy away

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 3>from the fact that mistakes were made. With twenty twenty

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 3>vision in hindsight, you can always look back on a

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 3>case that long and find the places where they might

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 3>have done something different. But the documentary doesn't choose to

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 3>pick over that. It respects the fact that those police

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 3>officers cared deeply and they did their best, and I

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 3>think that really comes across and even where they can

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 3>look back and say we would have done it differently,

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 3>it's from a place of maximum effort. And I think yea,

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 3>the empathy really applies not just to the victims Batchel,

0:08:57.800 --> 0:08:59.719
<v Speaker 3>to the investigators as well, which I think is quite

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 3>unique in this kind of documentary.

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.439
<v Speaker 2>Our starting point was the first people that we spoke

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 2>to were Wendy and Liz, So the surviving victims, and

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 2>that's some of the people I've worked with. Jacque and

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Willinge and Lisa Dupenoa did a really good job of

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 2>developing relationships with those guys and really cared about them,

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.679
<v Speaker 2>and we had psychologists on hand to talk to them

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that we were doing the right thing

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 2>by them. This was going to be a cathartic and

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 2>useful experience for those guys, and I'm really sure that

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 2>it was, having spoken to them and seen them over

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 2>the journey. I remember we did a show reel, We

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 2>did a taste of Real to show Channel ten. You know,

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Wendy and Liz, and their interviews were brilliant, really strong,

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 2>angry interviews. And then the second time we interviewed them,

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 2>they were still super strong, but some of the anger

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 2>had dissipated because they were being heard. That was one

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 2>of their biggest problems, that no one had been listening

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 2>to them. And you know, we had to balance their

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 2>story because they survived with the grief and trauma that

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 2>the other families went through, you know, and get the

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 2>balance in the storytelling right between those things. But it

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 2>was really that level of sort of how these crimes

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 2>were treated at the time, or how fences against women

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 2>were treated at the time, and how victims were often

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 2>treated back in times gone by, and how that has

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 2>now changed and is changing constantly. That was a really

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 2>important part of the film. It was sort of their underneath.

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 2>It's not the main driver, but it was definitely a

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 2>big part of the story that we wanted to tell.

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 2>The courage of these women to come forward. They had to.

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Both of those women had to get suppression orders removed

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 2>to be able to talk.

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>What I thought was really impressive was creating a sense

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of the time. I don't necessarily know whether or not

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>this man would have gotten away with what he got

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>away with. You know, now that we have the technology

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 1>that we have today, if that was real world now.

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree. One of the things that you said

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 2>earlier about the time and placing people back in that

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 2>time is really important because actually trying to solve these

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 2>crimes without mobile phones, without CCTV, without the internet. You know,

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 2>DNA was in its infancy when this was starting. This

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 2>is you know, almost a history of how to solve

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 2>crime at the same time. And I suspect that, you know,

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 2>there must be a lot of kind of nervous perpetrators

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 2>of crimes that now this technology is available, you're seeing

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 2>them solved. You're seeing more and more crime solved. But

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 2>that was really interesting to me because when you start

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 2>to look at it, you think, well, how did it

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 2>take this long and then when you look back at

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 2>what was available to those people, they did some amazing

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 2>stuff like they DNA swabs every taxi driver, police officer,

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 2>ambulance worker in path. I mean, that was at the

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 2>time just unbelievable. So and just the fact that you know,

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 2>when you start to make this film and you realize

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 2>that all of these the three women were from were

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 2>visiting one pub one one. This is a tiny, tiny

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 2>little community that was so close you know that everybody

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 2>knew everybody. So that made it an incredible story.

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 3>That's part of what I think probably makes this particular

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 3>case really resonate with an audience as well, that it's

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.839
<v Speaker 3>that pub. There's a pub like that in nearly everyone's neighborhood.

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 3>There is that place that people gather. Whether you live

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 3>in the city or in the country somewhere, there's always

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 3>that place where you, as a youth, you'd go all

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 3>the time. That was the kind of the local as

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 3>it were, And I think Claremont as a place and

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 3>those pubs, they almost become a kind of a character

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 3>within within the documentary. And you know, the way that

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Dan and the team sort of created a sense of

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 3>the nineties and what Perth was like back then. It

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 3>sort of feeds into this kind of scary sense that

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 3>it could have happened to anyone and it could have

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 3>been anyone, which is sort of where we got the

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 3>title for the film from as well.

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, I mean I think that was what it was

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>for me was I think we all think that we're smart,

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, and we wouldn't let this happen to us.

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>But it did happened, and it happened again and again,

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and someone was getting away with it, so you know,

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it does sort of you know, permeate with people who

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>are watching the show. You know, Dan, how did this

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>project come up for you? Because I know you moved

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>from quit Are you sorry you moved from England to

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Western Australia. I don't know how did it come across

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 1>your desk?

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Well, I think at first sort of I knew

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 2>of the story, but didn't know that much about it.

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 2>And then when he was arrested after so long, that

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 2>just was a really remarkable ton of events and everybody

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 2>was interested in that story. But how to tell that

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 2>story was the tricky bit. You know. We didn't want

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 2>to just do a straight retelling of the events. All

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 2>of the work that we do generally has other sort

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 2>of societal layers to it. So it was finding the

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 2>way into that through, you know, in a different way.

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 2>So that's how it sort of and finding finding the

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 2>surviving victims and hearing their stories was a really that

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 2>then started us thinking about, okay, how we tell this

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 2>for it more intelligently, I think, But yeah, that was

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 2>we wanted to do something other than just the straight retelling.

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 2>We wouldn't have done it otherwise, we really wouldn't, and

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 2>we did even have you know, we thought long and

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 2>hard about doing it. Even when we were we could

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 2>do it, was you know, we had to do it

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 2>the right way. It was really weighed heavily actually on

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 2>our shoulders that every decision we scrutinized really carefully, even

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 2>down to yeah, we removed any sort of gratuitous words

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 2>from news reports. We cut out you know, naked body

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 2>or whatever it was. We just wanted to make sure

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 2>that we were we were just telling the essence of

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 2>the story and not backing over anybody's grief unnecessarily.

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Karen, what was it about the Clamont murders that made

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Network ten want to tell this story?

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 3>In many ways? I was the perfect test case for

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 3>the pitch, actually, because I had never heard of the

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Clermont serial killing. So I moved to Australia eleven years ago,

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 3>so it was that in that perfect window where the

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 3>case had gone cold. Really, So when when and pitched

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 3>it to us, and I think two and a half

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 3>years ago now that the pitch first came to us,

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 3>it was completely fresh to me, and I was just

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 3>stunned by this story really, and you know, when Dan

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 3>told us it, it it was just a remarkable story.

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 3>And I went back and actually was at the West Australian,

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 3>I think, did a podcast and there was a lot

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 3>of episodes of this podcast. So I went home that

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 3>day after the pitch and put the podcast on and

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how many hours of this I listened to,

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 3>but I listened to dozens of hours, and I was

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 3>just completely hooked on the story. And I think immediately

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 3>it was obvious that this is a story that had

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 3>to be told. The timing was just right, with the

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 3>case finally being being ended and you know, the perpetrator

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 3>going to prison, and I think Dan's angle of telling

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 3>the story in a different way and not just retelling

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 3>it as a blow by Blow really resonated with us.

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 3>I think Dan mentioned a moment ago societal layers at

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 3>that time and still to this day. Of course, there's

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 3>a big topic around the way victims, particularly female victims,

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 3>are treated by the media and to a degree by

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 3>the police and society generally, and I think the timing

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 3>felt right to tell this story as well.

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to know from both of you your thoughts

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>on the popularity of true crime, you know, and why

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>we have had a rise and popularity for this genre,

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, both in podcasts and in television, you know,

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>what makes us so invested? Dan, I'll start with you.

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 2>I think anything on the edges of society or the

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 2>extremes of society is generally pretty interesting, you know, and

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 2>you want to feel safe, so you want to be

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 2>able to look at people who commit these kind of

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 2>crimes and think, well, that's not me, or they're different

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 2>to me, or they're a monster. And I think what's

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 2>really interested in this case is that it wasn't well

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 2>they were a monster, but they were just able to

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 2>survive in society. And that's the bit that I think

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 2>is really intriguing to people and why they want to

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 2>learn about cases like this because it just feels like

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 2>it literally was someone next door who was creating these

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 2>terrible events, and you kind of I think true crime

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 2>you want to be able to look at the perpetrators

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 2>and say they're different, because that makes you feel safer.

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 2>That's what I think I mean. And I think that

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 2>there is obviously, you know, there has been such a

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 2>large amount of really good true crime that has been

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 2>produced internationally. Now the bar has been raised. You have

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 2>to do these things well, they have to be smart,

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 2>they have to have multi layers. So I think that's

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 2>probably probably a combination of those things. There's a there's

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 2>a fascination in the worst of society.

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:33.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and look, there's there's a fascination fascination in the

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 3>people who perpetrate these crimes. But there's different types of

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 3>true crime documentary as well. You know, there are documentaries

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 3>that focus on those perpetrators and what is ticking underneath

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 3>it to make them do these things, But there's also

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 3>good old fashioned who done it? And I think you know,

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 3>audiences are well versed in in you know, procedural crime dramas,

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 3>and I think if you can apply those you know

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 3>that there's sort of the rules of procedural crime drama

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 3>to a real life story through documentary, You've got yourself

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 3>something that's even more engaging. Really so, I mean an

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:07.719
<v Speaker 3>element of it is just people have a good old

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:08.719
<v Speaker 3>fashion who done it well.

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I think they feel like they can become invested. I

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>will share something with the two of you. And I

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>started listening to a series of true crime podcasts, and

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>after listening to them for a while, I realized that

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>all the ones that I was listening to at a beginning,

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in a middle, and an end, and I needed that

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>somehow conditioned myself into needing that payoff at the end.

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 3>True. It's true of podcasts a lot, because so often

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 3>podcasts are coming out that are tackling a crime that

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 3>has just been reported or just happened, and you know,

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 3>very often no one has been caught, or it's a

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 3>missing person and they haven't been found and maybe will

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 3>never be found. It's a fair point as well, because

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 3>I think this story probably wouldn't have come to us

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 3>if it hadn't come to a conclusion. I think that

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 3>is it is an important part. If you're going to

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 3>invest three hours of your week into a film, you

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 3>do want a satisfying ending.

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm quite interested in as well, looking at

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 1>documentary versus scripted drama. You know, when it comes to

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>exploring and investigating real life events, do you have a

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>massive leaning preference to documentary over a retelling of real

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>life events.

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I certainly do. I mean, I'm you know, I'm

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 2>the sort of guy that only reads autobiographies and you

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 2>know anything that there's enough interesting real stuff out there

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 2>for me not to get too distracted by drama. And

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 2>I just think you're not to knock any dramas. And

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 2>I would do a drama, but I think you've got

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 2>to be even more careful if you do in a

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 2>drama as to why, you know, as particularly with a

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 2>case of sensitive as this. And there is a drama

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 2>coming out on this that I'm really interested to see.

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 2>But personally, I just I need to make sure I've

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 2>got my reasoning right for telling these stories.

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 3>I think there is there are there are some great

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 3>drama retellings of famous crimes that are brilliant. You know,

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 3>I've watched the House of Gucci not that long ago,

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 3>and it's a remarkable film. But you know, even something

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 3>like that is there's there's always points that are contested

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 3>about the way it's told. If you're going to dramatize

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 3>a story that is fraught with danger, and you know,

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 3>particularly the story like the Claremont serial killings, it's it

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 3>is something that you have to tread very very careful

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 3>on because it wasn't that long ago. The families are

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 3>still around. You have as a great responsibility on the

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 3>producer if you're going to if you're going to fictionalize something.

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>Did you both watch the Jeffrey Darmer series, you know,

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>by Ryan Murphy? And I wanted to know how that's

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>sapped with you. I don't know if one of you

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:24.959
<v Speaker 1>wants to handle that question or you both do, but

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to know whether you watched it.

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 2>We delivered this a long time before that came out,

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 2>so it didn't have any influence, and I think it

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 2>would Miami Current would be around. It's a it's a

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.719
<v Speaker 2>great piece of work. The thing for me is, you know,

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 2>we were very careful about one stage in the edit,

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 2>we didn't even have a picture of the perpetrator of

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 2>these crimes, so giving them airtime and making them some

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 2>sort of pseudo hero would be really wrong for me.

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 2>So that's you know, I haven't seen all of the

0:20:57.520 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 2>DAMA stuff, but that's the that that would be my

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 2>take on it. Just to be careful of what you're doing.

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think you have. There's a lot of choices

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 3>you can make as as a producer of a drama.

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 3>It felt, if I'm being completely honest, it felt of

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 3>little gratuitous For me personally. I found it very hard.

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 3>I think everyone found it hard to watch. I found

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:19.239
<v Speaker 3>it it was it was gratuitously explicit in places, and

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 3>I think that you have to ask yourself what there

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 3>has to be a reason for that. I think, you know,

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.199
<v Speaker 3>is it furthering your understanding of the character, Is it

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 3>furthering your understanding the motives whatever that is? So you know,

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 3>to Dan's point, you have has to be a real

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 3>if you're going to shock, I think there has to

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 3>be a really strong reason in your storytelling behind that.

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, it was terrifying that this man got away with

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>his crime for so long. You know, is that a

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:42.679
<v Speaker 1>sign of the times and the world that you know,

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you guys had to create with this or do you

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>think do you think then he would have been able

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to do this in twenty twenty two.

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 2>I think it's highly unlikely. I think the mobile phone technology, CCTV,

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 2>the internet, you know, I think it would have been

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 2>solved a lot of DNA in particular. I think it

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 2>shows just how far, you know, the police investigative techniques

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 2>have come that I think it would be very hard.

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 2>It would have been solved much.

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Quicker you've got. You've had a few cases in London recently,

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 3>two over the last year of women who have gone missing,

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 3>one who thankfully was found alive. And you see immediately

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 3>as soon as these people go missing, the way the

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 3>police are able to release a blow by blow of

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 3>that person's movement just through CCTV, you know, dash cam cameras.

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 3>I think that if this had happened, you know, if

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 3>this had happened modern day, they would at the very

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 3>least have probably quite quickly found a vehicle. There would

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 3>there would be a lot more to go off. Whether

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:37.959
<v Speaker 3>they would have caught the guy straight away, I don't know,

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 3>but it would have they would have had more leads,

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 3>that that's for certain.

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 1>And for the contributors like that, you know, you managed

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 1>to find, you know, the real life people to be

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>a part of the story. You kind of mentioned earlier

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 1>about it being a bit of a cathartic experience for them.

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>How have you gone keeping in touch with them and

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.959
<v Speaker 1>are they nervous about the show going on television.

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 2>We've definitely kept in touch with all the people involved

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 2>and have a on call site available before or after

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 2>broadcast whenever they need some support. And I think I

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 2>don't really know wh they're nervous. I think that they

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 2>want to get this story. They want to be heard,

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:19.199
<v Speaker 2>and they've written books, they've done some other media, so

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 2>they want to get it out there and to have

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 2>their story told. So I think it's going to be

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be a really interesting week to see

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 2>how the film is received and what the responses are.

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:32.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking forward to it.

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>How hard was it to get these people involved? I mean,

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>was it hard for you to get them involved?

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that it spoke, you know, to the efforts

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 2>that some of the people who worked on this show

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 2>went to that they they spoke to them a lot,

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 2>they spent a lot of time with them. They made

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 2>sure not from our perspective, like it wasn't just like

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 2>we wanted to coerce these people into making the film,

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 2>because that would have been wrong. It is the time,

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 2>right for these people to tell their story, and are

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 2>they happy to tell their story. That's a very important distinction,

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 2>because you know, you've got to you have a responsibility

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 2>here and you need to do things right. In terms

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 2>of we took we had a number of conversations with

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 2>the police before they became involved, and that they had

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 2>played such an important role and so grateful that they

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 2>gave us their time, and particularly Paul Ferguson, who had

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 2>left the police force and you know, was reliving this

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 2>again and I feel he felt he had a duty

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 2>to tell this story, that he had been so close

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 2>to it, so close to the family, he needed this

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 2>to be told. And then the journalists who did a

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 2>brilliant job of doing that thing that you talked about,

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 2>the scene setting, the taking you back there, telling you

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 2>what it was like to live through this thing. And

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:48.199
<v Speaker 2>journalists are good at that because that's how they make

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 2>their living, describing what things events are as they're unfolding.

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 2>And they did a brilliant job, people like Rexhare and

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Alison Fan and Bret Christian and Torran, They did an

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 2>awesome job they painting the picture for us and really

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 2>taking you back to getting the call that some you

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 2>know a body had been found, what it was like

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 2>to be on that you know that that car journey there.

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 2>And there's a shot in the film that I think

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.199
<v Speaker 2>is one of my favorite films in the film and

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 2>it's Paul Ferguson and he's one of the officers and

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 2>he's walking away at crime scene and his shoulders are

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 2>slumped and you can see the weight of this case

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 2>on one human being who's tasked with solving it. I

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:34.719
<v Speaker 2>thought that and the way that the edit ting handled

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 2>the verdict, I think that's one of my favorite things

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 2>that I've seen in all my time making TV shows,

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 2>just the emotion that comes out in that the verdict

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 2>and the people's faces as they're listening or they appear

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 2>to be listening. Of course they're not listening, but you're

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 2>going back with them and reliving their journey as the

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 2>verdict is read out. As a brilliant piece of documentary

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.160
<v Speaker 2>making by the editing.

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 3>I think we have to give a lot of credit

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 3>to Dan and his team as well, because, I mean,

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 3>anyone can come up to you as a network and

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 3>say we want to make a documentary about the claimont

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 3>serial killings, or Lindy Chamberlain or any other crime. But

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 3>apart from that producer's ability to tell great stories, you

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 3>need to have access to the people to help you

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 3>tell that story. And that was a massive part of

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 3>this because obviously we were sold on the story and

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 3>we were sold on Dan and the team the way

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 3>they wanted to tell it. But you know, as Dan

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 3>alluded to earlier, we funded some development first off, because

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 3>a lot of work had to be done to make

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:37.919
<v Speaker 3>sure that that story could actually be told with the

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 3>tools they had. And a credit has to go to

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Dan and the team because you know, the access and

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 3>the relationship they built over a long period of time

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 3>with the wa police or remarkable fruit because you can

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 3>almost sense the trust and honesty between the producer and

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 3>the police in the film. They're very open in a

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 3>way that I don't know I've seen police be in

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 3>a document entry like this, And of course, had the

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 3>trust required with the surviving victims, you know, you don't

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 3>just you don't step forward and talk about this life

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 3>changing event to anyone. You have to talk to people

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 3>that you trust. So there's a huge part of it

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 3>that it's about connecting with other humans and Dan and

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 3>the guys did an amazing amazing job there. And just

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 3>to make a further point on the journalists that Dan

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 3>talked about, you watched the documentary and you realize that

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 3>this event, these these killing, they shaped these journalists' careers.

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 3>These were huge moments for them reporting as well, and

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, you can see how much it means to them.

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 3>So I think that the the the assorted cast, whether

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 3>it's the victims, that the journalists and the police, it's

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 3>it took time and work to get there, but clearly

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 3>it's it's it's it's helped Dan deliver on the on

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 3>the vision.

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's been some amazing technology and science used

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>into solving this crime in Western Australia. Do you think

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that what's happened in Claremont gives hope to maybe some

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 1>other people who were still waiting for crimes to be solved.

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean what comes to mind for me is mister

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>crawl in Victoria. That's a crime that hasn't been solved.

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that gives hope to other people that

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe that too could be solved one day?

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Absolutely. I think one of the things that I

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 2>hope comes across in the film is just how important

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 2>Dennis Glennar was to making this solving this case. We

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 2>didn't speak directly to Dennis, but from everything I told,

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 2>he drove this investigation, invested a lot of money to

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 2>help the police, and I think that's important that there

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 2>is always someone from the victim's side of the coin

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 2>that is driving this alongside the police, not letting people forget.

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 3>To your point as well, around the forensics, I think

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 3>if you actually look at the if you were to

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 3>pick up the best, you know, the most successful true

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 3>crime documentaries of the last four years, probably three quarters

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 3>of them have been made because of forensic breakthroughs, because

0:28:56.120 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 3>stories have come back up. There's some great stories and

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 3>crimes that no one thought would ever get solved. And

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 3>I think we'll see over the probably the next five

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 3>to ten years, many more of these being solved and

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 3>many many more films being made about them.

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Guys, before we wrap up, I always ask this on

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. It's an interesting one to ask when it

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>comes to a documentary of this kind of subject matter.

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>But do you have a thing of like a behind

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the scenes secret, something that you know was a big

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>aha moment or something unusual that happened through the makings

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of this documentary.

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Rex Whore, who was one of a journalist. A lot

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 2>of the archive he had kept himself. No one else

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 2>had it. Ten didn't have it. He'd kept that on VHS.

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 2>That was because he the story was meant so much

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 2>to him. That was like he had so much really

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 2>important material, but he gave to us to tell the

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 2>story and that was that was so important because he

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 2>not only was he a journalist for Channel ten during

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 2>the time, he then became a police media person, so

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 2>he just had this amazing personal archive.

0:29:57.400 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Guys, I just want to say thank you so much

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>for coming on the podcast and talking about Clammont murders

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a killer amongst us. It's a fantastic documentary series that

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you guys should be really proud of. It did debut

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>on Network ten on the twenty third of November, and

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll conclude on the twenty fourth. If you have missed

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the series and you want to catch up on ten play,

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>please do so. But to the two of you, what

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>an amazing job and thank you so much for coming

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>on and sharing your story.

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Great. Thanks a lot much.

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Cheers