1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:03,280 Speaker 1: Now Russia reportedly wants to establish a base for its 2 00:00:03,320 --> 00:00:07,360 Speaker 1: air force in Papua, which is indeed thirteen hundred kilometers 3 00:00:07,360 --> 00:00:11,920 Speaker 1: from Darwin. Australian officials investigating that situation now we know 4 00:00:12,080 --> 00:00:16,240 Speaker 1: that it was indeed reported on Tuesday or military website 5 00:00:16,360 --> 00:00:20,640 Speaker 1: Jane's reporting that Russian officials had approached Jakarta and requested 6 00:00:20,680 --> 00:00:24,479 Speaker 1: its aerospace forces be given access to the base less 7 00:00:24,480 --> 00:00:27,960 Speaker 1: than two hours flying time from US here in Darwin. 8 00:00:28,360 --> 00:00:31,440 Speaker 1: The Prime Minister Anthony Albanesi and the Foreign Minister Penny 9 00:00:31,480 --> 00:00:35,760 Speaker 1: Wong yesterday refusing to confirm whether Jakarta received a request 10 00:00:35,800 --> 00:00:40,640 Speaker 1: by Moscow to use Indonesia as a base for Russian warplanes. 11 00:00:41,040 --> 00:00:44,240 Speaker 1: We also know that the Chief Minister Leofanocchiaro spoke about 12 00:00:44,240 --> 00:00:48,360 Speaker 1: this yesterday at a press conference where she was indeed asked. 13 00:00:48,560 --> 00:00:51,639 Speaker 1: She said it highlighted the need for a stronger defense 14 00:00:51,840 --> 00:00:56,080 Speaker 1: presence in the top end, telling journalists this does highlight 15 00:00:56,120 --> 00:00:59,400 Speaker 1: the strategic importance of the northern territory and the defense 16 00:00:59,440 --> 00:01:04,280 Speaker 1: security of this nation. It is something that successive federal governments, 17 00:01:04,480 --> 00:01:08,479 Speaker 1: she says, have completely dropped the ball on. Now joining 18 00:01:08,560 --> 00:01:13,280 Speaker 1: us for some insight is the Australian Strategic Policy Institute's 19 00:01:13,360 --> 00:01:17,840 Speaker 1: senior analyst, Doctor Malcolm Davers. Good morning to you, Dr Davis. 20 00:01:18,200 --> 00:01:20,039 Speaker 2: Good morning, lovely to have you. 21 00:01:20,000 --> 00:01:22,440 Speaker 1: On the show. Now tell me what was your reaction 22 00:01:22,560 --> 00:01:25,520 Speaker 1: when this report first came to light a little earlier 23 00:01:25,560 --> 00:01:26,040 Speaker 1: in the week. 24 00:01:26,880 --> 00:01:29,440 Speaker 2: Look, I was quite shocked. I was actually at a 25 00:01:29,440 --> 00:01:32,600 Speaker 2: conference organized by James and spoke to the author of 26 00:01:32,640 --> 00:01:35,720 Speaker 2: the report and he basically said that the Russians had 27 00:01:35,760 --> 00:01:39,280 Speaker 2: made this approach to the Indonesian government. He indicated that 28 00:01:39,480 --> 00:01:43,160 Speaker 2: the approach by the Russians was under consideration at the time, 29 00:01:44,400 --> 00:01:46,920 Speaker 2: and so I was quite concerned because if the Russian 30 00:01:47,080 --> 00:01:50,520 Speaker 2: did in fact establish a permanent access to the site 31 00:01:50,600 --> 00:01:54,160 Speaker 2: this airbase on Biek Island, which is in thirteen h 32 00:01:54,200 --> 00:01:57,680 Speaker 2: o clometers north of Darwin, that would give them the ability, 33 00:01:57,680 --> 00:02:01,240 Speaker 2: obviously to threaten much of northern Australia a wartime scenario, 34 00:02:01,280 --> 00:02:03,760 Speaker 2: but also to attack our key allies such as the 35 00:02:03,840 --> 00:02:06,560 Speaker 2: US and Japan across the end of Pacific region. And 36 00:02:06,600 --> 00:02:10,040 Speaker 2: these bombers that they're talking about are nuclear capable, so 37 00:02:10,080 --> 00:02:13,760 Speaker 2: they can carry nuclear tipped missiles. So it was a 38 00:02:13,880 --> 00:02:18,480 Speaker 2: very serious indication of a rapid deterioration now security outlook. 39 00:02:18,760 --> 00:02:21,160 Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, and yesterday we were then in the situation, 40 00:02:21,240 --> 00:02:23,520 Speaker 1: of course where the Prime Minister Anthony Albanezi and the 41 00:02:23,520 --> 00:02:27,760 Speaker 1: Foreign Minister Penny Wong refusing to confirm whether Jakarta had 42 00:02:27,800 --> 00:02:31,000 Speaker 1: received a request by Moscow or not. But from what 43 00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:33,800 Speaker 1: you are saying, the author of that report has said 44 00:02:33,840 --> 00:02:35,639 Speaker 1: that this absolutely did happen. 45 00:02:36,440 --> 00:02:39,000 Speaker 2: Well, I think it's highly likely that Moscow did actually 46 00:02:39,760 --> 00:02:43,080 Speaker 2: put in a formal request to the Indonesian government. Now, 47 00:02:43,280 --> 00:02:46,000 Speaker 2: what the Indonesian government are saying is that it's not 48 00:02:46,040 --> 00:02:51,160 Speaker 2: going to happen, that there's no possibility of Russia having 49 00:02:51,200 --> 00:02:54,120 Speaker 2: permanent access to that airbase. But it's important to note 50 00:02:54,520 --> 00:02:58,240 Speaker 2: that in twenty seventeen, the Russians did actually operate two 51 00:02:58,760 --> 00:03:01,960 Speaker 2: t U ninety five Bear bombers from that airbase as 52 00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:03,639 Speaker 2: part of an exercise. 53 00:03:03,280 --> 00:03:05,000 Speaker 1: What what you did. 54 00:03:05,280 --> 00:03:10,440 Speaker 2: Them twenty seventeen and that resulted in Royal Australian Air 55 00:03:10,480 --> 00:03:14,440 Speaker 2: Force Air Defense units probably at RAF Tindal, going on 56 00:03:14,520 --> 00:03:20,080 Speaker 2: heightened alert. As a result, we've also seen Indonesia drawing 57 00:03:20,160 --> 00:03:25,000 Speaker 2: closer to Russia under the current Proboa administration. They've seen 58 00:03:25,800 --> 00:03:30,399 Speaker 2: Indonesian Russian joint naval exercises recently, So there was that 59 00:03:30,400 --> 00:03:34,000 Speaker 2: that context which this report came out of that I 60 00:03:34,000 --> 00:03:38,200 Speaker 2: think justified some concern that the Indonesians have said it's 61 00:03:38,240 --> 00:03:41,160 Speaker 2: not going to happen. That doesn't mean that the Russians 62 00:03:41,160 --> 00:03:42,920 Speaker 2: didn't actually put in a formal. 63 00:03:42,600 --> 00:03:45,880 Speaker 1: Request, Doctor Davis, What do you think it sees you 64 00:03:45,920 --> 00:03:49,400 Speaker 1: know about the current state of play within the world 65 00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:51,920 Speaker 1: right now? We know that we're in quite uncertain times 66 00:03:51,920 --> 00:03:53,760 Speaker 1: in a lot of ways, but is this a situation 67 00:03:53,760 --> 00:03:55,400 Speaker 1: where Russia's flexing their muscle. 68 00:03:56,720 --> 00:03:59,720 Speaker 2: Look, Russia and China are flexing their muscle. They are 69 00:03:59,760 --> 00:04:03,800 Speaker 2: working together along with North Korea and Iran as part 70 00:04:03,840 --> 00:04:08,240 Speaker 2: of an access of authoritarian states to directly challenge liberal 71 00:04:08,240 --> 00:04:12,360 Speaker 2: democracies around the world. Ukraine, for example, is one part 72 00:04:12,440 --> 00:04:15,840 Speaker 2: of that. But also you're seeing the Chinese moving aggressively 73 00:04:15,880 --> 00:04:19,520 Speaker 2: around Taiwan and preparing for the possibility of an invasion 74 00:04:19,560 --> 00:04:22,359 Speaker 2: of Taiwan by China. And I think that when you 75 00:04:22,440 --> 00:04:27,440 Speaker 2: see sort of suggestions of a Russian presence in the 76 00:04:27,960 --> 00:04:31,200 Speaker 2: Indo Pacific region, that could be part of a coordinated 77 00:04:31,240 --> 00:04:35,280 Speaker 2: plan by this access of authoritarian states to challenge Western 78 00:04:35,680 --> 00:04:39,040 Speaker 2: dominance in the world. So I think we are saying 79 00:04:39,040 --> 00:04:42,480 Speaker 2: we're uncertain times. There's probably an understatement. I think we're 80 00:04:42,520 --> 00:04:46,960 Speaker 2: in extremely dangerous times, probably the most dangerous times we've 81 00:04:47,000 --> 00:04:50,480 Speaker 2: seen since the end of the Second World War, and 82 00:04:50,520 --> 00:04:52,240 Speaker 2: I think we need to be ready for all sorts 83 00:04:52,279 --> 00:04:53,680 Speaker 2: of possibilities in that regard. 84 00:04:53,839 --> 00:04:55,880 Speaker 1: And so what do we need to do to make 85 00:04:55,960 --> 00:04:58,600 Speaker 1: sure that we are ready? Because I know the Chief Minister, 86 00:04:58,720 --> 00:05:02,719 Speaker 1: Our Chief Minister lif Nokiao yesterday said at a press 87 00:05:02,720 --> 00:05:06,160 Speaker 1: conference that she had not been briefed on this situation, 88 00:05:06,920 --> 00:05:10,920 Speaker 1: and she said that it does highlight the strategic importance 89 00:05:11,080 --> 00:05:14,840 Speaker 1: of the Northern Territory and the defense security of this nation. 90 00:05:15,120 --> 00:05:19,040 Speaker 1: She reckons it's something that successive federal governments have completely 91 00:05:19,160 --> 00:05:22,039 Speaker 1: dropped the ball on. But what needs to be happening 92 00:05:22,120 --> 00:05:26,359 Speaker 1: for us here in Northern Australia as we see this 93 00:05:26,520 --> 00:05:29,680 Speaker 1: uncertainty or these quite unprecedented times. 94 00:05:30,279 --> 00:05:32,480 Speaker 2: Look, I think if there is a crisis in the future, 95 00:05:32,560 --> 00:05:37,120 Speaker 2: possibly emerging as a result of a Chinese invasion across 96 00:05:37,120 --> 00:05:41,159 Speaker 2: the Straits to Taiwan, and you know there was to 97 00:05:41,160 --> 00:05:43,800 Speaker 2: be a tax on Australia itself as part of that, 98 00:05:45,080 --> 00:05:48,080 Speaker 2: the attacks would come in through Northern Australia. You would 99 00:05:48,160 --> 00:05:52,560 Speaker 2: see bases and facilities across the North being attacked by 100 00:05:52,760 --> 00:05:56,719 Speaker 2: long range missiles, and you know, these bombers potentially could 101 00:05:56,720 --> 00:05:58,960 Speaker 2: have operated out of would have could have been part 102 00:05:59,000 --> 00:06:02,840 Speaker 2: of that. I do think that, you know, whichever party 103 00:06:02,880 --> 00:06:06,960 Speaker 2: wins on May third does need to take defense much 104 00:06:06,960 --> 00:06:10,120 Speaker 2: more seriously than is currently iver party are suggesting they 105 00:06:10,160 --> 00:06:13,640 Speaker 2: will in terms of defense spending, that the proposed levels 106 00:06:13,640 --> 00:06:16,880 Speaker 2: of defense spending, be it by Labor or by the 107 00:06:16,920 --> 00:06:22,160 Speaker 2: Liberal National Coalition, are grossly inadequate. And I think what 108 00:06:22,200 --> 00:06:25,080 Speaker 2: we need to be doing is dramatically boosting defense spending 109 00:06:25,480 --> 00:06:28,599 Speaker 2: much more rapidly and acquiring capabilities much more rapidly. And 110 00:06:28,720 --> 00:06:32,560 Speaker 2: part of those capabilities would include hardening the North and 111 00:06:32,640 --> 00:06:35,880 Speaker 2: strengthening our ability to defend the North against these sorts 112 00:06:35,880 --> 00:06:36,400 Speaker 2: of threats. 113 00:06:37,080 --> 00:06:40,520 Speaker 1: And doctor Davis, what might that look like for us? 114 00:06:41,040 --> 00:06:43,480 Speaker 1: You know, to put it in real layman's terms. 115 00:06:44,080 --> 00:06:48,159 Speaker 2: Well, essentially, what it means is increasing the number of 116 00:06:48,440 --> 00:06:51,520 Speaker 2: base facilities up in the North that can support ADF 117 00:06:51,560 --> 00:06:56,080 Speaker 2: and Allied units and then hardening those bases against the 118 00:06:56,160 --> 00:06:58,720 Speaker 2: sorts of attacks we could see. So, you know, one 119 00:06:58,720 --> 00:07:01,920 Speaker 2: of the things that the nine twenty twenty three Defense 120 00:07:01,920 --> 00:07:06,360 Speaker 2: Strategic Reviews suggested was rapidly deploying integrated air and missile 121 00:07:06,360 --> 00:07:09,880 Speaker 2: defense systems. The current government has chosen to ignore that 122 00:07:10,000 --> 00:07:12,440 Speaker 2: and kick the can down the road. So what we 123 00:07:12,480 --> 00:07:15,920 Speaker 2: should be doing is building up our defensive capabilities, including 124 00:07:15,960 --> 00:07:20,080 Speaker 2: those integrated air and missile defense systems that can defend 125 00:07:20,120 --> 00:07:23,880 Speaker 2: those bases against long range missile threats that China, for example, 126 00:07:23,920 --> 00:07:28,640 Speaker 2: can conmount. And in other words, it could mean a 127 00:07:28,920 --> 00:07:33,440 Speaker 2: much more robust military presence across the North to be 128 00:07:33,440 --> 00:07:36,840 Speaker 2: able to defend Northern Australia. Not so much against an invasion. 129 00:07:36,880 --> 00:07:39,520 Speaker 2: I don't think that's going to happen, but in terms 130 00:07:39,600 --> 00:07:43,880 Speaker 2: of defending against long range missiles, the sorts of things 131 00:07:43,960 --> 00:07:47,000 Speaker 2: that you could see launch from Chinese naval vessels that 132 00:07:47,400 --> 00:07:54,440 Speaker 2: recently circumnavigated Australia, and our ability to detect and attack 133 00:07:54,920 --> 00:07:57,440 Speaker 2: an enemy force at great range and attack that force 134 00:07:57,480 --> 00:07:58,960 Speaker 2: from Northern Australia. 135 00:07:59,080 --> 00:08:01,560 Speaker 1: So it doesn't But from what you're saying, I get 136 00:08:01,600 --> 00:08:04,760 Speaker 1: the impression it doesn't sound like we need to be alarmed, 137 00:08:04,920 --> 00:08:08,080 Speaker 1: but we need to beef up, we need to be prepared. 138 00:08:09,240 --> 00:08:11,600 Speaker 2: We should be alarmed in the sense that things are 139 00:08:11,600 --> 00:08:14,440 Speaker 2: moving rapidly, in the sense that we don't have a 140 00:08:14,440 --> 00:08:16,720 Speaker 2: lot of time. You know, there are a lot of 141 00:08:17,360 --> 00:08:20,480 Speaker 2: key thinkers in the US, including in the US military, 142 00:08:20,880 --> 00:08:24,840 Speaker 2: are suggesting that a crisis across the Taiwan Straits could 143 00:08:24,880 --> 00:08:28,440 Speaker 2: occur in twenty twenty seven. We're in two years time, 144 00:08:28,920 --> 00:08:31,800 Speaker 2: so that's not a lot of time to prepare. So 145 00:08:31,840 --> 00:08:33,600 Speaker 2: in that sense, I think we should be alarmed, but 146 00:08:33,640 --> 00:08:38,560 Speaker 2: we should use that alarm to focus our policy and 147 00:08:38,600 --> 00:08:43,120 Speaker 2: our efforts towards strengthening those defense capabilities. We shouldn't panic, 148 00:08:43,679 --> 00:08:44,720 Speaker 2: We should be alarmed. 149 00:08:44,840 --> 00:08:47,679 Speaker 1: Do you feel as of the Australian government or you know, 150 00:08:47,840 --> 00:08:52,000 Speaker 1: either side? I suppose because we are in absolute election mode. 151 00:08:52,000 --> 00:08:55,400 Speaker 1: But do you feel as though they are then, you know, 152 00:08:55,480 --> 00:08:59,120 Speaker 1: negotiating and talking with the US, you know, with the 153 00:08:59,240 --> 00:09:02,160 Speaker 1: US government in the way that we potentially. 154 00:09:01,600 --> 00:09:04,719 Speaker 2: Need to be right now, well, I think the US 155 00:09:04,840 --> 00:09:08,520 Speaker 2: government is making it clear to us that we need 156 00:09:08,559 --> 00:09:12,720 Speaker 2: to lift our game. The US Undersectuary for Strategic Policy 157 00:09:12,720 --> 00:09:15,320 Speaker 2: and the Partner of Defense, Elbrich Colby, has made it 158 00:09:15,320 --> 00:09:18,360 Speaker 2: crystal clear to us that we need to shift defense 159 00:09:18,400 --> 00:09:21,520 Speaker 2: spending up to a floor of three percent GDP as 160 00:09:21,600 --> 00:09:25,840 Speaker 2: soon as possible. If you look at the current government's policies. 161 00:09:25,920 --> 00:09:29,040 Speaker 2: They're talking about two point three to three percent by 162 00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:32,800 Speaker 2: twenty thirty three, and the coalition is suggesting two point 163 00:09:32,920 --> 00:09:36,920 Speaker 2: five percent by about the same time. So neither party 164 00:09:37,120 --> 00:09:40,840 Speaker 2: have basically done what they need to do to prepare, 165 00:09:40,920 --> 00:09:44,000 Speaker 2: which is to increase that defense spending as rapidly as possible. 166 00:09:44,400 --> 00:09:46,600 Speaker 2: I think we obviously are talking to the Americans. We 167 00:09:46,640 --> 00:09:48,480 Speaker 2: talk to the Americans all the time, as we do 168 00:09:48,559 --> 00:09:52,319 Speaker 2: with the Japanese and the South Koreans and others. But 169 00:09:52,679 --> 00:09:57,000 Speaker 2: come the election, whichever party forms government, they will come 170 00:09:57,080 --> 00:10:00,240 Speaker 2: under intense pressure from the Trump administration to lift their 171 00:10:00,240 --> 00:10:03,520 Speaker 2: game and spend more on defense than is currently planned for. 172 00:10:04,160 --> 00:10:08,440 Speaker 2: Current defense policy documents are inadequate to deal with the 173 00:10:08,480 --> 00:10:09,480 Speaker 2: threat that we're facing. 174 00:10:09,800 --> 00:10:12,560 Speaker 1: And doctor Davis, it's interesting because you know, whenever we 175 00:10:12,640 --> 00:10:15,200 Speaker 1: then have the Defense Minister on the show, whenever we 176 00:10:15,240 --> 00:10:18,360 Speaker 1: talk defense, you know, you get the impression, or they 177 00:10:18,440 --> 00:10:20,560 Speaker 1: certainly try to give off the impression that, you know, 178 00:10:20,600 --> 00:10:23,000 Speaker 1: we've got more than enough troops up here in the 179 00:10:23,040 --> 00:10:26,120 Speaker 1: top end, and we've got various different exercises happening with 180 00:10:26,160 --> 00:10:30,000 Speaker 1: different countries, and you know that they're doing enough, but 181 00:10:30,160 --> 00:10:31,920 Speaker 1: it really doesn't sound. 182 00:10:31,800 --> 00:10:35,560 Speaker 2: Like we are well, you know, as I said, we 183 00:10:35,600 --> 00:10:37,280 Speaker 2: need to prepare for the right sort of threat. I 184 00:10:37,320 --> 00:10:40,960 Speaker 2: don't think anyone's seriously thinking that Northern Australia is going 185 00:10:41,000 --> 00:10:43,760 Speaker 2: to be invaded by China, but I do think we 186 00:10:44,480 --> 00:10:46,600 Speaker 2: need to be starting to think about how we defend 187 00:10:46,640 --> 00:10:49,640 Speaker 2: the North from long range vessile attacks. For example, that 188 00:10:49,679 --> 00:10:53,480 Speaker 2: you know, the Chinese have a missile capability that can 189 00:10:53,480 --> 00:10:57,760 Speaker 2: attack Darwin and Tindall from the South China Sea and 190 00:10:58,360 --> 00:11:01,360 Speaker 2: we have nothing to defend the game that sort of capability. 191 00:11:01,360 --> 00:11:06,840 Speaker 2: They're bringing on board hypersonic weapons that can essentially strike 192 00:11:06,880 --> 00:11:09,240 Speaker 2: at a target at very long range, at very high speed. 193 00:11:09,679 --> 00:11:12,880 Speaker 2: You know, naval capabilities, air capabilities that can all strike 194 00:11:12,880 --> 00:11:15,720 Speaker 2: at our key NOORBN bases and not just military bases, 195 00:11:15,760 --> 00:11:23,839 Speaker 2: but also civilian targets. If they hit our logistics, our fuel, infrastructure, 196 00:11:24,480 --> 00:11:28,160 Speaker 2: energy generation, all of that, then they can essentially leave 197 00:11:28,240 --> 00:11:31,680 Speaker 2: us with an inability to function. So it's about hardening 198 00:11:31,720 --> 00:11:35,440 Speaker 2: the North, it's about protecting and defending ourselves, and it's 199 00:11:35,480 --> 00:11:39,160 Speaker 2: about projecting power from the North into the Endopacific to 200 00:11:39,240 --> 00:11:42,000 Speaker 2: strike at a target or an adversary while they're still 201 00:11:42,040 --> 00:11:42,880 Speaker 2: a long way away. 202 00:11:43,520 --> 00:11:46,080 Speaker 1: Doctor Davis, I know there'll be some people listen this morning, 203 00:11:46,120 --> 00:11:48,200 Speaker 1: listening this morning who might think, oh, this is a 204 00:11:48,200 --> 00:11:50,080 Speaker 1: bit of scare mongering. I mean, what would you say 205 00:11:50,120 --> 00:11:51,080 Speaker 1: to them? 206 00:11:51,679 --> 00:11:54,199 Speaker 2: It's not scare mongering. I mean my job as a 207 00:11:54,240 --> 00:11:56,880 Speaker 2: strategic analyst is to think about war and to think 208 00:11:56,880 --> 00:12:00,240 Speaker 2: about future war. I do it every day. And the 209 00:12:00,280 --> 00:12:02,200 Speaker 2: way I'm seeing the world going at the moment, not 210 00:12:02,280 --> 00:12:05,200 Speaker 2: just in the Inno Pacific but also in Europe, we 211 00:12:05,320 --> 00:12:09,640 Speaker 2: are heading towards some very dangerous times. I would love 212 00:12:09,720 --> 00:12:12,720 Speaker 2: to see the world as it was, maybe back in 213 00:12:12,760 --> 00:12:15,199 Speaker 2: the nineteen nineties, when really there wasn't a threat of 214 00:12:15,320 --> 00:12:18,400 Speaker 2: major power war. But times have changed. We've got a 215 00:12:18,520 --> 00:12:22,640 Speaker 2: very different situation now, and we are very much in 216 00:12:22,640 --> 00:12:26,880 Speaker 2: a situation now comparable to the mid to late nineteen 217 00:12:27,040 --> 00:12:30,600 Speaker 2: thirties where we do need to be thinking about these 218 00:12:30,600 --> 00:12:32,760 Speaker 2: threats and we do need to take them seriously, because 219 00:12:32,760 --> 00:12:37,240 Speaker 2: if we don't, and these sorts of challenges happen and 220 00:12:37,240 --> 00:12:39,880 Speaker 2: we end up in a major war, we lose that war, 221 00:12:40,640 --> 00:12:43,720 Speaker 2: then the cost to this country will be immeasurably greater 222 00:12:44,200 --> 00:12:47,400 Speaker 2: than the cost we would pay by being ready well. 223 00:12:47,440 --> 00:12:52,200 Speaker 1: Australian Strategic Policy Institute senior analyst doctor Malcolm Davis. I 224 00:12:52,240 --> 00:12:56,760 Speaker 1: really appreciate your time this morning, some wonderful insight and 225 00:12:57,160 --> 00:13:00,760 Speaker 1: real food for thought. I think potential particular LEO should 226 00:13:00,800 --> 00:13:04,160 Speaker 1: say as we are edge closer to the election and 227 00:13:05,440 --> 00:13:07,079 Speaker 1: I've no doubt that we're going to end up with 228 00:13:07,600 --> 00:13:10,280 Speaker 1: Australia's leaders in the top end at different times. So 229 00:13:10,280 --> 00:13:13,080 Speaker 1: you've given me some good things to ask about. 230 00:13:13,960 --> 00:13:15,640 Speaker 2: Well, it's my pleasure, always happy to help. 231 00:13:15,800 --> 00:13:17,800 Speaker 1: Thank you so much. Thanks for your time. I really 232 00:13:17,840 --> 00:13:18,600 Speaker 1: appreciate it.