WEBVTT - Did We Kill ⚰️The Sassy Man? 🤴🏻💀 💅🏻

0:00:01.600 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Flex and Frooms.

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Flex and fromes. This is the Flex and Frooms catch

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 2>up podcast.

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>It is Flexing Rooms on kater. If you've spent any

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>time on the internet, I'm on, you would have noticed

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a trend popping up. It's called the sassy man apocalypse.

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 1>It is what it says, sassy men and it being

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 1>the end of what we consider to be the world

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>as we know it now. For those of you who

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't encountered a sassy man or you're unfamiliar with what

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that might mean, it's a social phenomenon where men are

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>observed behaving femininely or sassily. It's generally playful, but some

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:40.279
<v Speaker 1>are misogyny coded or people just making fun of men

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>behaving like women. It's two or three prong depending on

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:45.599
<v Speaker 1>who's who's coming at you with it. So here are

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>some examples of a sassy man being a passenger princess,

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>your girls in the in the driver's seat, you're in

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the side seat on your phone, scrolling TikTok as assassin

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>about that, him being moody when he's hungry. Sassy man

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>behavior a ledge getting upset at youth, not getting a

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>good photo of him. Sassy man behavior complaining about his

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>friends not going to the restaurant he wanted sassy man behavior.

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>Now you're wondering where are these examples coming from? I TikTok.

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I scrolled through the hashtag, through the trend, I thought,

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>how deep does this really go? It's quite shallow, but

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll keep going. Him getting annoyed when his girlfriend stops

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>rubbing his back, him saying you don't love him because

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:28.559
<v Speaker 1>you didn't text good morning. That's giving.

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 2>That's like bordering into lack manipulation territory.

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>But all right, cleyon. So basically what's happening is like cis,

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>hetero men are going against their typical popular masculine coding

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and feeling and complaining and wanting to be perceived and

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to be noticed and to be acknowledged and to be

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>given the same kind of considerations as their women counterparts would.

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>And what's ironic about that is like women aren't liking it.

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 2>I've heard of this, right, It's like when like when

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I went through my he's just not let in two

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 2>faces and I was going on redd at heaps and like,

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 2>but let's like ask men or something threads and they're like,

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 2>have you ever like opened up to like. The question

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 2>was like, what is something that everyone tells you should

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 2>do that you do that backfight and it was like

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 2>being like sharing my emotions with my girlfriend and then

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 2>being like.

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Ill being emotionally vulnerable. And you might say, Okay, maybe

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>this is just conjecture or correlation doesn't equal causation. It's

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.959
<v Speaker 1>not every woman that hates when a man is being

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>openly vulnerable. And there's a difference between being openly vulnerable

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and being sassy. These things are definitely true. It did

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>remind me, however, of a book that I was reading

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>by a black feminist author called Belle Hooks, and the

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>book is called The Will to Change, and it's about

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>masculinity and how in order for us to better understand men,

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we need to understand masculinity in all forms, patriarchy, positive

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 1>and toxic masculinity, and really start to lead with love

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>when we have these conversations about men, and especially two men.

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>But she talked about how we don't actually want men

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to be sensitive emotionally. We're a nuance. We often shame

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>men back into their gender role. And so you have

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a man who's like, I don't feel cared for when

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't when you aren't physically affectionate, or I don't

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>feel seen when you don't say good morning the first thing,

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and then we throw it back at them, Oh you're

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>so sassy or you're being girly? What's this about? Like,

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>why don't you just can't you emotionally soothe yourself? Aren't

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you masculine? Do you see the irony? It's not good, babe.

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 2>I like to think I wouldn't do that, but but yeah,

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>And yet we have to be mindful about how we

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>reinforce these gender roles because it's very like covert. But

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the quote that uh, she's the quote in particular is

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it stands to reason then that the masses of women

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>committed to the sexist principle that men who express their

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>feelings are weak really don't want to hear men speak,

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>especially if what they say is that they feel hurt

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>or that they feel unloved. The cracks of the sassy

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>man apocalypse is men letting you know that they are

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>whole people, and the women who are on the other

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>end of this behavior like be less whole because now

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I have to be accountable to you in some way,

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and I don't want to do that. If you have

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>any thoughts on the sasi Amount Apocalypse. I'd love to

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>hear it because I'm not done speaking about it, but

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've got more of a show to do

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. Yes, yes, If you have more thoughts about

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:21.359
<v Speaker 1>the sas Amount Apocalypse, definitely hit us up on Instagram.

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>It's Flex and frooms.

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 2>There's a polar guist outside of the studio. There's a

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 2>light turning on and off. Is this like an emergency?

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>They say?

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Definitely?

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Not all not all men. Yes, how do you feel

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>about sax Amount Apocalypse?

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 2>For me?

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Have you heard about this trend?

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen it in action?

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Or have I seen in action? Like I've always had

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:43.799
<v Speaker 2>guy friends that have been able to like have conversations

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 2>with me, like you know how Like the typical idea

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 2>is like people like, oh, I'm only friends with guys,

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 2>you know that whole rhetoric like they pick me, Oh yeah,

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Like I would say that this might be meta meta

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 2>pick me with me to say, but like, oh, I

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 2>was a drama girl, so I had heat of guy friends.

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know.

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 2>What I'm trying to say. So I was like friends

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of drama guys. That would be definitely very

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 2>much in the sassy camp.

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Got it right.

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 2>It's giving in touch with the emotions, and I I

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 2>liked it. I feel like I've grown up with like

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 2>my dad, for example, is very like masculine vibes, but

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 2>also he's actually really sensitive. So I've kind of seen

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 2>the dichotomy of like having a feeling and then expressing

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 2>it in a certain way, like and then how it

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of like comes through the prism of the way

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 2>he's been socialized when he just has the same like

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.359
<v Speaker 2>emotional vibes as me, like very emotional, very like quick

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 2>to feel an emotion and like respond, did I use

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 2>the economy right? There? Is it not quite right?

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter. I got your vibe.

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And I remember my uncle used to teach me

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 2>when I was a kid, don't go their girlfriend and

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 2>you're doing. And I don't think that was him because like,

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 2>I feel like for a long time, the whole sassy

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 2>thing has been used in a way that is like

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 2>what's it called, uh not, what's it called when you

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 2>discriminate against LGBGQI plus men homophobic? Like I feel like

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of this kind of like sassy was very

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 2>early two thousands homophobic coded like movie style stuff. So

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 2>I think we're getting beyond it, but I do wonder

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 2>if there is a hangover for people in our generation

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 2>where we've grown up with these movies that are like

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 2>like I've watched in early two thousands of movie the

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 2>other day and I was like, on the plane back

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 2>from New York, I was shocked by how many jokes

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 2>about a man being gay there was, like it was

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 2>open slaver. And so I wonder if there's like kind

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 2>of this like hangover of thinking that, Yeah, don't. I

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:55.280
<v Speaker 2>don't know what I'm trying to say.

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I will say, sassy men in my type personally, and

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>all my favorite men are by this definition sasy men

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>being raised by women, being emotionally aware, being able to

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>engage with me like I engage with them. It's the

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Or maybe I'm like more masculine, you know

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>what I mean? Who knows? All our coding is confusing,

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>But I will say why. I think I think it's

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>ironic that we're phrasing this kind of like emotional sentience

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of men as an apocalypse, like that phrasing the sassy

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>men apocalypse. We're not talking it. We're not talking it

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>but sorry, we're not saying it's patriarchy two point zero

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>or positive masculinity or modern masculinity. It's been called the

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>sassy man apocalypse. It's being inferred that it's silly and

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that it's juvenile, and that it's reactive, and that it

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>is not to be taken seriously, and that I think

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>is really tricky because if I was to use any

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of these phrases I said earlier, these quotes or these

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>identifies being a passenger princess, being moody when you're hungry.

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>But I said it was a woman who did it.

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>You tay, Oh, that's that's the woman experience. Like we

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>are living life, that's just what we're doing. But I

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.239
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's kind of ironic that we can't see

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it for what it is when the shoe is on

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the other foot. I'm not just moody when I'm hungry

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>for no reason. I've maybe assessed in the dynamic that

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you're I'm your responsibility and you've let it go for

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>too long and now I'm annoyed. Or let's say I

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>got annoyed that you didn't send me a good morning text. Isolated,

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you might say, oh, that feels like a little bit

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>emotionally an adminipulative, But no, there's a responsibility between two

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>people who are in a partnership for you to check

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>on me and me to check on you. When if

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine, if I said, oh, this is this

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is a woman existing, you'd be like, oh, yeah, I

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>can see those sensitivities. I can understand. But as soon

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>as a man wants that same consideration, I don't think

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>we're really well equipped to dole it back in a

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>way that's respecting of how they'd want to receive love

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and partnership and to be acknowledged. And that I think

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>is really it's lame number one, and it proves how

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>much progress we haven't made, especially in feminism. Like when

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>modern women talk about feminism, it's still very women centered,

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>as it should be, but we have to interact with

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>heaps of non women and we don't know how to yet,

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and so we're encouraging all this behavior. We just want

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:25.839
<v Speaker 1>men who can tell us how they feel and who

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>aren't afraid to just be themselves and be comfortable, and

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>then when they do, we're like.

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Ah, doing it wrong, You're.

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Doing it wrong. Can you that with like less feeling

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and you have your back up straight, definitely chest out.

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, that would be really really good if you

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>could do that. And just like maybe don't cry when

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you're upset because that makes me feel kind of weird.

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>But like tell me, but don't say you're sad, because

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I so you're going through.

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 2>We didn't even bring up IX. This is what that is.

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 2>This is completely related. Yeah, it's the same.

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Thing, just people expressing their human behavior. And I do

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>think the sassy Man Apocalypse is going to backfire in

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a really bad way. People are already teetering too close

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to fem cell in Cell, you know, we're already onto

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>two of the most extreme extremes there is.

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Can we do an episode on theem cell because I

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 2>hadn't really heard that before. Yeah, we can. I'll write

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:18.559
<v Speaker 2>it down.

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you?

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Cell. Did that make sense at all?

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>When it always makes sense?

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay? Yeah, I hope you guys knew what I meant

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:30.319
<v Speaker 2>you ate with flexrooms. You've been listening to The Flex

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 2>and Froom's daily podcast. For more, tune into cater on

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 2>DAB or stream it on iHeartRadio.