Speaker 1: This is Outspoken. The podcast is not afraid to say
Speaker 1: exactly what you're thinking. Our names are Amy Kate and
Speaker 1: Sophie Torba. We're identical triplets, but we often don't have
Speaker 1: identical opinions, so sometimes things can get heated. Outspoken covers
Speaker 1: all things reality TV, influences, entertainment, and issues facing women.
Speaker 1: That is so fat. Thank you, Happy Friday, and welcome
Speaker 1: back to another episode of Outspoken.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: This week, I could not have agreed more with Brooke Hogan.
Speaker 1: She went on an Instagram story and said that she's
Speaker 1: got no idea what to wear anymore because she's basically
Speaker 1: been wearing activewear for the last year and she's got
Speaker 1: no idea what's going on in fashion anymore. This is
Speaker 1: what she had to.
Speaker 2: Say, having a moment, I think where all I've worn
Speaker 2: for basically the past year is activewear every single day
Speaker 2: that I actually don't know in terms of style what
Speaker 2: suits me anymore. And I'm really struggling with pants and shoes.
Speaker 2: I usually love high waisted like flared, but then they
Speaker 2: look weird with boots, but then I don't have any
Speaker 2: straight leg pants that I like, and then I have
Speaker 2: no shoes to it. Other than runners because my boots
Speaker 2: are quird. I just I'm really struggling, guys, And I'm
Speaker 2: not sure if it's just like fashion or if it's
Speaker 2: the fact that I've been so reliant on active wear
Speaker 2: that I've just completely lost touch with what's.
Speaker 1: Called Yeah, well, the lockdowns have completely screwed me over,
Speaker 1: but also so has working from home for four years, Sophie.
Speaker 1: Because we are really lucky to wear track pants every
Speaker 1: day to work if we wish to. Why I don't
Speaker 1: actually wear track pants. I wear tight save me to work.
Speaker 1: I don't know, you're a very big track suit person.
Speaker 1: But I could not agree more with their sentiment about
Speaker 1: trying to find boots that go with flares or the
Speaker 1: new mum jeans, because I was getting ready for a
Speaker 1: meeting and I've bought these new nice boots and I
Speaker 1: was so excited to wear them with my new jeans,
Speaker 1: and I literally like a pirate or something trying to
Speaker 1: get they just look ridiculous and you've got to wear
Speaker 1: white shoes with them. But then I feel like that's
Speaker 1: unprofessional to wear to a meeting. Yeah, I feel like
Speaker 1: it's either sneakers or high heels that look good with
Speaker 1: some of those new flared pants or oversized pants. It's
Speaker 1: like I'm not wearing high heels. They're not really made
Speaker 1: for winter either, are they. Because you've got this slight
Speaker 1: bit of your ankle that's poking out, do you know
Speaker 1: what you've got to do? So for you, you've just
Speaker 1: got to wear skinny jeans because you can wear boots
Speaker 1: with skinny jeans, you can wear sneakers with skinny jeans,
Speaker 1: but they're uncomfortable. I literally I cannot bring myself to
Speaker 1: wear uncomfortable pants. I have to. I mean, as soon
Speaker 1: as I get home from work, I either get into
Speaker 1: tights or my pajamas. And literally, I've been wearing the
Speaker 1: daggiest pair of ripped jeans to work. It's actually disgusting.
Speaker 1: They're like five years old and falling apart, but they're
Speaker 1: the most comfortable because the low ride. Now I'm not
Speaker 1: trying to name drop here, but we actually do a
Speaker 1: bit of work with Callum Han from Mastership and it
Speaker 1: was pretty funny because we had to be at this
Speaker 1: shoot that was really early in the morning. It was
Speaker 1: a bit of a marketplace tour for our client, pick
Speaker 1: a local, and basically I just chucked my mum jeans
Speaker 1: on and I'm renowned for never having socks that match. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I had two different socks on, and they're not the
Speaker 1: cool socks that go below the sneakers. They were the
Speaker 1: ones that just go above and you look like a dog.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: So you had one sock that was like an ankle sock,
Speaker 1: and then you had one sock that was a higher Yeah,
Speaker 1: so it looked like an absolute mess. Anyway, Callum was
Speaker 1: standing there and I went up to order something at
Speaker 1: the cafe and he said, oh, oh yeah, ankles cold
Speaker 1: in those I can see your socks poking out and
Speaker 1: I and I just wanted the floor to swallow me
Speaker 1: at that point because but but this is what I
Speaker 1: don't get. Aren't those long socks now in amy? Because
Speaker 1: you were trying to rock some sort of high Nike
Speaker 1: socks with tights on a walk. I have seen Sarah's
Speaker 1: Danger New active wear shoet is that in? Because I
Speaker 1: wouldn't even know, well, it's apparently in. And the only
Speaker 1: reason I bought them was because I kept wearing these
Speaker 1: penguin bed socks around on our walks. That wasn't a
Speaker 1: great And Sophy said, I looked so bad that I thought, well,
Speaker 1: if I buy these Nike long socks, at least I'm
Speaker 1: kind of in fashion. But I've got to say on
Speaker 1: Brooks comments, she actually looks really good in an active
Speaker 1: wear and I just look like a complete bum. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's the thing. There is a real difference between like
Speaker 1: a nice set of active wear and just the shit that,
Speaker 1: like the mismatched shit that you wear. My issue is
Speaker 1: that I'm not one of those people that look clean. Now,
Speaker 1: I don't know, I'm not obviously not a mum, but
Speaker 1: I feel like mums could relate to the feeling of
Speaker 1: not looking clean, because I mean they probably have vomit
Speaker 1: all over their clothes. I instead have makeup, so all
Speaker 1: of my collars have foundation or powder or something on it.
Speaker 1: So I'd go out of the house and just look unclean. Well,
Speaker 1: that's like because I've had, you know, the lockdown, and
Speaker 1: I feel like, as Brookers said, everyone's been wearing active
Speaker 1: wear for the past year and a half. It was
Speaker 1: so funny the other day I wore jeans in front
Speaker 1: of dal Or and I just had a normal hoodie on,
Speaker 1: and He's like, looking good. I was like, I've literally
Speaker 1: made no efforts, So maybe that's the only positive thing
Speaker 1: that when you actually do make a slight effort, people
Speaker 1: not well. Jean's now is an effort, it really is.
Speaker 3: You can never have enough hats, gloves, and shoes.
Speaker 1: Chloe sepp Is called out Outspoken, as well as gossip
Speaker 1: pages and articles for putting her down. On Tuesday night,
Speaker 1: the Gold Coast based influencer shared a lengthy post on
Speaker 1: Instagram where she invited followers who didn't align with her
Speaker 1: to unfollow her. Kate, do you think Chloe is an
Speaker 1: Outspoken listener? Well, it is possible that she listened to
Speaker 1: Monday's episode, but I think it's more likely that she
Speaker 1: discovered our podcast through the Daily Mail. So it seems
Speaker 1: like some journalists from the Daily Mail are listening to
Speaker 1: Outspoken because they've written quite a few articles based on
Speaker 1: conversations that we've had on our podcast. So on Tuesday,
Speaker 1: they wrote an article based on our discussion on Monday's
Speaker 1: podcast episode where we revealed that Chloe has lost over
Speaker 1: six thousand followers in the last thirty days, and this
Speaker 1: came after she shared her support for the protests, and
Speaker 1: in contrast, we spoke about how Abby Chatfield had gained
Speaker 1: over sixteen thousand followers after calling out the protest Now.
Speaker 1: Funnily enough, the Daily Mail also wrote an article based
Speaker 1: in now comments around Tammy Hembroove's new Bentley and her
Speaker 1: getting ten and makeup marks on it seems like there
Speaker 1: was a bit of a slow newsday. I had a
Speaker 1: few friends send this through and I thought it was
Speaker 1: absolutely hilarious. I did like that the Daily Mail tagged
Speaker 1: our podcast as well, because always a bit of good
Speaker 1: pr I want to say thank you to whoever it
Speaker 1: is from the Daily mailers listening. It made my day. Actually,
Speaker 1: this thing, I mean, you know, it is a questionable
Speaker 1: publication at times, but you know, maybe they're looking up
Speaker 1: in the world if they're starting to report on stuff
Speaker 1: from the podcast. Amy, what can you please share with
Speaker 1: us what Chloe's post actually said. Well, Chloe wrote two
Speaker 1: articles gossip pages, podcast people, anyone out there to put
Speaker 1: others down and in that fact, anyone feeding that listening
Speaker 1: to that engaging and that I'm here to set a
Speaker 1: harsh boundary. It's twenty twenty one and if you still
Speaker 1: participate in feeding on gossip drama, putting others down, you
Speaker 1: have an illness. And I'm telling you it's worse than
Speaker 1: any virus going around? Now do you really like being
Speaker 1: so negative and horrible? Does it make you feel that
Speaker 1: good to put others down? If you're doing this, I
Speaker 1: really encourage you to be better, take your power back
Speaker 1: and become better for your own life instead of putting
Speaker 1: others down to try to get them on your level.
Speaker 1: You are so miserable on I promise you. I used
Speaker 1: to be judgmental, negative, but that was when I was
Speaker 1: really unhappy in myself. Now I'm thriving. I don't need
Speaker 1: to associate in that because I feel good and that
Speaker 1: brings me down. Now, if you're still here and you
Speaker 1: don't want to be better, unfollow me. I don't have
Speaker 1: time for people that aren't willing to be better. I'm
Speaker 1: losing followers by the day and I literally am waving
Speaker 1: them goodbye. The more alignment for me, the better. Only
Speaker 1: up from here. So Chloe's partner Mitch also shared the post,
Speaker 1: obviously showing his support and put clapping hands, and he
Speaker 1: also shared a photo of himself and his son Artie
Speaker 1: and wrote be so positive that negative people unfollow you
Speaker 1: on Instagram. Gee, I think that's really what's happening here.
Speaker 1: I think He's hit the absolute name on the head
Speaker 1: with that one. Well, the whole thing is that I
Speaker 1: feel like a lot of people who still follow Chloe
Speaker 1: Zepp would have read that, and they probably did go
Speaker 1: and unfollow her as a consequence, because so many people
Speaker 1: are just so angry about the misinformation she and her
Speaker 1: family are putting online during this lockdown. I think Chloe's
Speaker 1: response to this criticism from our podcasts and also other
Speaker 1: media outlets was incredibly disappointing. I mean to be honest, though,
Speaker 1: I wasn't surprised, as this is the default response from
Speaker 1: basically every influence that we've ever held to account on
Speaker 1: this podcast. Rather than actually taking the constructive criticism on board,
Speaker 1: they always instead deem it as bulling, and they just
Speaker 1: try to push their rhetoric that everyone is miserable and
Speaker 1: jealous of all. There's a reason why people are unfollowing them,
Speaker 1: and it's because of the negative messaging they've been putting
Speaker 1: out recently. Yeah, I agree, Amy, and I'm getting really
Speaker 1: frustrated that influencers think that they are above feedback. If
Speaker 1: you just look at the name given to them. Influencers
Speaker 1: have a powerful influence on our society, particularly the younger generations.
Speaker 1: So if you're an influencer, you are not above critique.
Speaker 1: If you look at Chloe, she currently has a platform
Speaker 1: of six hundred and seventy six thousand followers. This is
Speaker 1: a massive responsibility and one that she has taken on
Speaker 1: board in order to enjoy the lifestyle she has been
Speaker 1: afforded due to her following. I mean, at twenty two
Speaker 1: years old, she has a multimillion dollar property, luxury cars,
Speaker 1: she has amazing goes on amazing holidays, has designer jewelry,
Speaker 1: bags and clothes. She's in a very enviable financial position
Speaker 1: thanks to this large following, and she has also had
Speaker 1: the opportunity to launch successful businesses based on this inbuilt audience.
Speaker 1: All of these opportunities have come to her from this
Speaker 1: social media following. And while I'm not trying to discount
Speaker 1: the work she has put into cultivating this following and
Speaker 1: launching her own business, it's pretty fair to say influencing
Speaker 1: is not a difficult job compared to others. If any
Speaker 1: of their daily Instagram stories of vlogs are anything to
Speaker 1: go by, It's a lot of exercising, brunching, and approving
Speaker 1: of other people's idea. Yeah, and The thing is, though,
Speaker 1: you're basically telling your audience who who by following you
Speaker 1: have given you this amazing life and these amazing opportunities
Speaker 1: to go away if you don't agree with their rhetoric
Speaker 1: on COVID. The other thing that disturbs me on so
Speaker 1: many levels is the constant throwing around of this term bulling.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, there is no bulling involved if you were
Speaker 1: holding to account someone's behavior. We're critiquing Chloe Zep's behavior here.
Speaker 1: We are not critiquing her as a person or throwing
Speaker 1: around insults to me because her as a person. I mean,
Speaker 1: I've always loved following her and Mitch, but I can't
Speaker 1: stand by and let them put out this misinformation about
Speaker 1: COVID that is actually affecting the whole world. We can't
Speaker 1: stand by. I mean, personally, they're probably really nice people,
Speaker 1: but unfortunately you can't put this stuff out online that
Speaker 1: does a thing to go and have to go go
Speaker 1: and have a drink with them down the parb or
Speaker 1: have a lunch with them. I'm sure that they're lovely people,
Speaker 1: but when you dig a little bit deeper, we're talking.
Speaker 1: But that's what I'm saying. But I'm just saying that
Speaker 1: it's not bulling to disagree with some one's point of
Speaker 1: view and the harmful message that they're putting out to
Speaker 1: follow it. But at the at the end of the day,
Speaker 1: I feel like they've changed a lot in the last
Speaker 1: year and a half and it seems like since they've
Speaker 1: entered this kind of wellness environment that it's radically changed
Speaker 1: their opinions. And I saw this really great post that
Speaker 1: Olivia Rodgers shared from Claire Bowditch, and she said, choosing
Speaker 1: not to get vaccinated when you could get vaccinated is
Speaker 1: not a passive act in the current circumstances. It is,
Speaker 1: in fact, an act of deep aggression against Australian culture, artists,
Speaker 1: small business and our ability to move forward with our lives.
Speaker 1: And I could not agree more. I think that's why
Speaker 1: it's becoming quite personal, because it is a form of
Speaker 1: aggression and it is putting everyone's lives and livelihoods at
Speaker 1: risk now. Chloe continued to push medical misinformation on her
Speaker 1: Instagram stories this week, so on Wednesday, Chloe shared a
Speaker 1: post saying people who don't rely on pharmaceuticals and work
Speaker 1: on their health naturally are the healthiest people alive when
Speaker 1: did they become the spreaders of disease? When did they
Speaker 1: become the selfish ones? They put the most time, effort,
Speaker 1: and resources towards health than anyone else. Can she just
Speaker 1: put down her phone and stop googling this stuff now?
Speaker 1: She followed this up by sharing an image of two
Speaker 1: fish bowls, one with dirty water and the other with
Speaker 1: clean water. It then said how would you treat a
Speaker 1: sick fish theory? One? Medicate the fish theory? Two clean
Speaker 1: the tank? Oh I feel on it was that easy?
Speaker 1: So Shortly after these posts, Chloe began to backtrack on
Speaker 1: her commentary after presumably receiving backlash, saying she wasn't at
Speaker 1: all trying to put down pharmaceuticals or modern medicine. She wrote, ps,
Speaker 1: modern medicine is amazing and is life saving. I'm all
Speaker 1: here for it in certain circumstances. She then went on
Speaker 1: to say that she was talking about people with unhealthy
Speaker 1: habits that use pharmaceuticals to get rid of symptoms but
Speaker 1: don't treat the underlying cause. And then she spoke about
Speaker 1: her own experience with taking rot acotane and the pill
Speaker 1: to treat her acne. She said it was lifestyle food
Speaker 1: and emotions causing her acne, So changing her lifestyle, change
Speaker 1: the symptoms. Now, I'm sorry, but an infectious disease is
Speaker 1: slightly different to acne. Well, she's claiming that she wasn't,
Speaker 1: Like I feel like she's trying to say that she
Speaker 1: wasn't talking about COVID and this post was just made
Speaker 1: about healing your gut, health and all that kind of bullshit.
Speaker 1: But why would you make it when we're in the
Speaker 1: middle of a pandemic. Queensland's just gone into lockdown, Sydney
Speaker 1: is obviously in a long term lockdown. It's quite clear
Speaker 1: that she is trying to push a certain agenda, but
Speaker 1: then as soon as she gets any negative feedback, she
Speaker 1: quickly retreats. And it's like, no, no, no, I wasn't
Speaker 1: saying that. It's like you clearly were Exactly why would
Speaker 1: you be posting that sort of stuff during this time,
Speaker 1: and especially when you're aware that your followers are dropping.
Speaker 1: There's a reason why. Yeah, Well, it wasn't only Chloe
Speaker 1: that had a big week. Mitchell Orvil's week was quite
Speaker 1: controversial as well. So on Sunday, Mitch was hit by
Speaker 1: a car role riding his bike and Mitch jumped onto
Speaker 1: his Instagram story to share his experience. Bplained how a
Speaker 1: guy called Brad, who he'd met at the gym two
Speaker 1: weeks ago, was the first on the scene and picked
Speaker 1: him up with his girlfriend and dropped him home. Now,
Speaker 1: it was quite ironic because the guy Brad, he actually
Speaker 1: followed Mitch on Instagram, and he had told his girlfriend
Speaker 1: earlier that that day that he was going to do
Speaker 1: a three kilometer run because he felt very inspired by Mitch,
Speaker 1: because Mitch has been sharing that he's doing a three
Speaker 1: k run every day in twenty twenty one as a
Speaker 1: part of a New Year's resolution. So in the vlog,
Speaker 1: Mitch revealed that he and Chloe had been fighting in
Speaker 1: the car before the accident took place. Mitch said that
Speaker 1: he didn't want to sit in the car and continue
Speaker 1: to argue, so he got out and rode home on
Speaker 1: his bike. I'm confused where the bike. Oh, I think
Speaker 1: it was one of those you know, those bikes that
Speaker 1: you can that you can pick up off the side
Speaker 1: of the road, those e bike things. That's what I assumed. Okay,
Speaker 1: that made more sense. He then said. The conversation between
Speaker 1: him and Chloe was left open ended. And it would
Speaker 1: have been a terrible last conversation to have. Interestingly, after
Speaker 1: Mitch shared all this, he actually received a lot of
Speaker 1: backlash over the incident. Amy, can you tell us what happened? Yeah, so,
Speaker 1: some followers message Mitch saying he'd broken lockdown rules for
Speaker 1: getting into the car with the couple. So at the time,
Speaker 1: Southeast Queensland had gone into a lockdown and it was
Speaker 1: against the rules to be with people outside of your household.
Speaker 1: So what sparked the outrage from followers was the fact
Speaker 1: that Mitch she had and Instagram story when he was
Speaker 1: in the car with the couple and they weren't wearing
Speaker 1: masks in the car. So in Queensland, you can only
Speaker 1: leave your home for essential purposes. You must be wearing
Speaker 1: a face mask at all times when you leave the house,
Speaker 1: so obviously that applies to when you're in the car,
Speaker 1: unless you are alone in your car or with a
Speaker 1: member of your household. So these people obviously didn't expect
Speaker 1: that Mitch was going to be, you know, pop up
Speaker 1: and be hit by a car. To be honest, I
Speaker 1: thought the backlash was a little bit unfair on Mitch
Speaker 1: because I'm sorry, but this is obviously an emergency situation
Speaker 1: where someone has been hit by a car, so these
Speaker 1: people coming to his aid were obviously had his best
Speaker 1: intentions at heart and were trying to help. I think
Speaker 1: in these situations you can forgive them and him for
Speaker 1: not wearing mask. However, I do think it is slightly
Speaker 1: odd that the first thing they didn't do was call
Speaker 1: an ambulance, because you don't know what sort of internal
Speaker 1: injuries he may have been suffering from at the time.
Speaker 1: See for me, I think the backlash. While obviously it's
Speaker 1: not great that Mitch was in an accident, and I
Speaker 1: really do feel for him in that situation, I think
Speaker 1: it was really irresponsible to just jump into some people's
Speaker 1: car during the lockdown. Are you serious? Yeah? Why would
Speaker 1: you not call an ambulance? He had to tie a
Speaker 1: mark on his back. I agree about not calling an ambulance,
Speaker 1: but I don't think that the first thing you think
Speaker 1: when someone has been hit by a car, Hey, I'm
Speaker 1: going to whack my mask on. You probably think, fuck,
Speaker 1: I've gotta go and help that person. But it's not
Speaker 1: so much on him. He was clearly in shock and
Speaker 1: had a lot of adrenaline running through him. It should
Speaker 1: have been the people that came to his aid that said, mate,
Speaker 1: let's just wait for an ambulance because you could be
Speaker 1: have internal inn Look at the end of the day,
Speaker 1: I know the police commissioner here in South Australia said
Speaker 1: a lot of the rules with the masks of the
Speaker 1: common sense. So I don't think if there was a
Speaker 1: police officer who was there, I don't think they would
Speaker 1: have find any of them because of the situation that
Speaker 1: they found. But why couldn't Why couldn't the people in
Speaker 1: the car have been wearing masks if they picked him up.
Speaker 1: My boyfriend was hit by a car I think it
Speaker 1: was the start of this year, and he was in
Speaker 1: shock and it wasn't as bad as what happened to
Speaker 1: Mitch by the looks of Mitch's the tiremark on Mitch's bag,
Speaker 1: but he was very insistent that he didn't want to
Speaker 1: go to the hospital. And that's what, unfortunately a lot
Speaker 1: of men do. They're like, no, no, I'm fine, I'm fine.
Speaker 1: So he might have insisted to these people and they're
Speaker 1: not his family members, they're not going to say no,
Speaker 1: we're calling you an ambulance. Well, what do you guys
Speaker 1: think in regards because Mitch also caught backlash because the
Speaker 1: following day he went to the beach and it seems
Speaker 1: like it's a bit of a ritual for him. He
Speaker 1: goes down to the beach like five six am and
Speaker 1: does some special breathing exercises and meditation. So he was
Speaker 1: there with a friend, So in Queensland you are allowed
Speaker 1: to go on walks with a friend that's outside of
Speaker 1: your household. However, he was sitting next to him. They
Speaker 1: were clearly meditating on the beach, and in Queensland you
Speaker 1: can take your mask off if you're participating in strength
Speaker 1: was exercise. However, like I think just walking around you
Speaker 1: actually have to wear a mask, so I would assume
Speaker 1: that would be the same case with meditating. I think
Speaker 1: it's a bit nitpicking. It's a difficult one. I do
Speaker 1: feel like Chloe, Zepp and Mitchell are really under the
Speaker 1: microscope at the moment and people are just looking for
Speaker 1: things to be angered about. At the end of the day.
Speaker 1: I do think that Chloe spreading misinformation on an Instagram
Speaker 1: page is something to sort of jump up and down with.
Speaker 1: But I do feel like I don't know with Mitch,
Speaker 1: I don't know if he's actually like, obviously we need
Speaker 1: to call that people's behavior if they're doing the wrong thing.
Speaker 1: But as you said, Sophia, I think there's a bit
Speaker 1: of nitpicking going on. Yeah, I don't know. I just
Speaker 1: feel it's a bit of nitpicking. Obviously it's not the
Speaker 1: perfect situation. But they were outside on a beach. I
Speaker 1: have more of an issue when I see them walking
Speaker 1: around in shops with no masks on, when it's mandatory
Speaker 1: to enter these shops. Don't you think people are nitpicking
Speaker 1: because it's like a culmination of things, like if it
Speaker 1: was just I understand if he was just not wearing
Speaker 1: a mask on the beach, and he looked very emotional
Speaker 1: in the post that he did share. But my thoughts are, Okay, Firstly,
Speaker 1: you've gone to the extent of filming your reaction to
Speaker 1: this meditation after you've been hit by a car, so
Speaker 1: you're obviously in the mental space that you can set
Speaker 1: that up. Why could you then not wear a mask?
Speaker 1: It doesn't really add up. Maybe because of the deep
Speaker 1: breathing with the meditation, because that's the reason why you're
Speaker 1: not meant to have that's the reason why you're allowed
Speaker 1: to not have a mask. On. If you're doing lots
Speaker 1: of exercise, I'm assuming the deep breathing might have been white.
Speaker 1: Do it at home, then sorry, you don't have to
Speaker 1: do it at the beach. People are meant to be
Speaker 1: staying home and this is a serious illness that has
Speaker 1: been well. On the other hand, Kate, you've got to
Speaker 1: think about his mental health here. This guy was hit
Speaker 1: by a car. Potentially he's reflecting on the fact that
Speaker 1: he almost could have died. So maybe for him going
Speaker 1: to the beach is really aiding his mental health. I
Speaker 1: don't know. I think it's all a little bit nitpicky.
Speaker 1: I completely one hundred percent agree that the medical misinformation
Speaker 1: that chloes up is pushing, but I don't think it's
Speaker 1: fair to pick on every small little thing that they
Speaker 1: have ever done. I just think it's getting a little
Speaker 1: bit too nitpicky here.
Speaker 2: Could you just once not remember every little thing.
Speaker 1: Sammy Robinson has finally can firmed her split with long
Speaker 1: term boyfriend Nick Wheatley. This is what she had to
Speaker 1: say on YouTube.
Speaker 3: So many things in my life have changed in the
Speaker 3: last few months. Moved houses, moved houses, offices. We can't
Speaker 3: even go into the office anymore. My team changed on
Speaker 3: One Mile. I went through a breakup, which I don't
Speaker 3: really want to get into in this video. I don't
Speaker 3: really want to address it.
Speaker 4: But.
Speaker 1: It's kind of insane really.
Speaker 3: That's sort of why I've been a little ama on YouTube,
Speaker 3: To be honest, I have had massive anxiety about getting
Speaker 3: back on social media and talking about everything and slash.
Speaker 3: I've just been hustling with One Mile and distracting myself
Speaker 3: with that sort of side of my job. So I've
Speaker 3: definitely neglected you guys.
Speaker 1: What do you guys think caused Sammy to come out
Speaker 1: and finally speak about this topic, because she's released quite
Speaker 1: a few vlogs since the breakup and has stayed quiet
Speaker 1: on it. Well, I think that possibly a reason that
Speaker 1: she's come out and confirmed the split, But it is
Speaker 1: because of the rumor circulating about her new boyfriend, Jordan Simmy.
Speaker 1: So if she is in fact going to come out
Speaker 1: soon and announce that she's officially with this guy, she
Speaker 1: has got to confirm the split. Yeah, that could be
Speaker 1: true because Jordan Simmy has a podcast where he's pretty
Speaker 1: open and honest about his life, so it's only a
Speaker 1: matter of time if they are together that he's going
Speaker 1: to speak about her, and I, as you say, I
Speaker 1: suppose it looks good if she actually confirms that she
Speaker 1: has broken up with Nick. I did really feel for her, though,
Speaker 1: because she said she's been feeling really anxious about sharing
Speaker 1: this news on social media, and he gave a real
Speaker 1: insight into what it must be like having to share
Speaker 1: that sort of personal information to a big audience. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it did really humanize her, and I think it was
Speaker 1: good that she opened up about feeling that way, because
Speaker 1: a lot of people do expect to hear a lot
Speaker 1: of dirt and all the nitty gritty when people announce
Speaker 1: a breakup, So I think it was good that she
Speaker 1: said that she was somewhat nervous about doing so. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's also very respectful to Nick, which I'm sure he'll appreciate.
Speaker 1: It will be interesting to see if we do hear
Speaker 1: more on the topic.
Speaker 3: Oh my God, I'm tey Central.
Speaker 2: Are you man?
Speaker 1: Mikayla Tester has revealed she thinks she's pregnant to boyfriend
Speaker 1: Addis Paul. The Only Fans star shared the news on
Speaker 1: her TikTok this week. Sophie, what did Mikayla say so?
Speaker 1: Mikayla explained that she did a pregnancy test and found
Speaker 1: out she was going to be a mum. So she
Speaker 1: did three tests in total that revealed that she is pregnant.
Speaker 1: She said she was incomplete disbelief over it, so she
Speaker 1: in fact did another test in the morning and the
Speaker 1: result was the same. Here's what she said, how do.
Speaker 4: I even tell you guys this? So last night I
Speaker 4: did a pregnancy test and found out I was going
Speaker 4: to be a mother. I thought, oh no, no, maybe
Speaker 4: the test is just faulty. No, they broth, they both
Speaker 4: say pregnant. I still didn't believe it. So I, well, okay,
Speaker 4: I'm going to wake up tomorrow morning and I'm going
Speaker 4: to do another test and just get fresh pea. It
Speaker 4: literally says pregnant. I'm going to be a fucking mom.
Speaker 4: I'm going to be a fucking mother. Oh shit, what
Speaker 4: the universe is crazy? The universe brings crazy things into
Speaker 4: my life every day, and this is just.
Speaker 3: Crazy.
Speaker 4: I don't even know how. I don't even know how
Speaker 4: to feel. This has not sucking. Obviously not conferming because
Speaker 4: I need to go to a doctor. But lockdown.
Speaker 1: I find it funny how she has to mention the
Speaker 1: universe it seems like a very influencer twenty twenty one
Speaker 1: thing to say. Mikayla then uploaded a second video where
Speaker 1: she said she was getting so many comments saying her
Speaker 1: test was negative and that the clear Blue test was unreliable.
Speaker 1: She wanted to say that she was really confused and
Speaker 1: she was now going to go to the doctor to
Speaker 1: get confirmation. And I don't blame her because I looked
Speaker 1: at the tests and I didn't even think it looked
Speaker 1: like she was pregnant. Now, is anyone else a little
Speaker 1: bit concerned about what Mikayla and Adis are going to
Speaker 1: call this child? I know we did a segment a
Speaker 1: couple of weeks ago about terrible baby names and the
Speaker 1: fact that these two have called their bald cat ball sack.
Speaker 1: I don't know my alarm nuts sack. Sorry, my alarm
Speaker 1: bells are ringing of what this name is going to be. Well,
Speaker 1: after our segment on l Darby's baby, and we went
Speaker 1: through all the names of the band in Australia, I
Speaker 1: do feel a little bit better about the fact because
Speaker 1: I don't think a name like Nutsack would be allowed
Speaker 1: in Australia. Now, Adams Paul seemed to be very excited
Speaker 1: by the news that he was going to become a father.
Speaker 1: This is what he said, I.
Speaker 5: Just got the sexiest girl in the world pregnant. He
Speaker 5: took a few more tests to be sure, and all
Speaker 5: of them say pregnant. I don't know what to do,
Speaker 5: but this is fucking amazing. I think I've had a
Speaker 5: little bit too much of these big fat cheeks. But yeah,
Speaker 5: I don't know what to do now.
Speaker 1: I feel like that's a very Adams Pool response to
Speaker 1: the pregnancy announcement. It was quite funny because an eagle
Speaker 1: eyed fan spotted on an Instagram post from eight weeks
Speaker 1: ago a comment from Mikayla, and she wrote, how do
Speaker 1: you like your eggs cooked in the morning? Baby? And
Speaker 1: he replied, yours fertilized with love her. Doesn't that just
Speaker 1: make you feel sick and is so gross? So do
Speaker 1: we think that it's been planned? A planned pregnancy? Well,
Speaker 1: I don't follow them that closely, but I did see
Speaker 1: a few comments saying that Michayla seemed very keen to
Speaker 1: have a child, which did surprise me. There seem to
Speaker 1: also be a lot of questions around why Michayla had
Speaker 1: chosen to share the news so early in the pregnancy,
Speaker 1: considering she's not even quite sure if she is pregnant.
Speaker 1: It did get me thinking, though, because I feel like
Speaker 1: there's a lot of conversations around the fact that people
Speaker 1: should announce their pregnancy after twelve weeks. However, it seems
Speaker 1: like that's getting a little bit outdated now that people
Speaker 1: are really wanting to normalize conversations around miscarriage. So while
Speaker 1: I feel weird praising Michayla and Addis because obviously this
Speaker 1: is not quite a normal announcement, particularly Addis's response, I
Speaker 1: do think it's good because creating conversations around how pregnancy
Speaker 1: announcements should be performed, and you know, maybe it is
Speaker 1: a good thing that they've come out early and said it. Well,
Speaker 1: I think that's all we've got time for today. Thank
Speaker 1: you so much for listening to today's episode. If you
Speaker 1: have enjoyed today's show, could you please make sure to
Speaker 1: leave us a five star review and make sure you
Speaker 1: are subscribed on Spotify and Apple Podcasts. And if you'd
Speaker 1: like to join in the conversations, please head to our
Speaker 1: Facebook page, which has outspoken the podcast community, and what
Speaker 1: I love is when people join our community. We have
Speaker 1: a list of questions and it says how did you
Speaker 1: hear about the podcast? And so many people are saying
Speaker 1: that they heard about the podcast through friends, which makes
Speaker 1: me so happy to hear friends recommending it to one another.
Speaker 1: So if you think your friend would love this podcast,
Speaker 1: please do us a favor and let them know. I
Speaker 1: also love when people share that they're listening to the
Speaker 1: podcast on their story, if it's on a walk or
Speaker 1: cooking or whatever they're doing, so please keep that up
Speaker 1: to