1 00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:03,160 Speaker 1: Good morning everybody, and welcome to the Daily OS. It's Monday, 2 00:00:03,240 --> 00:00:06,720 Speaker 1: the ninth of May, and we are heading into another 3 00:00:06,840 --> 00:00:09,880 Speaker 1: week of the campaign. Sam. Last night was the second 4 00:00:10,039 --> 00:00:13,320 Speaker 1: of the debates between Prime Minister Scott Morrison and Opposition 5 00:00:13,440 --> 00:00:16,120 Speaker 1: Leader Anthony Albernezi. And we'll get to a bit about 6 00:00:16,120 --> 00:00:18,840 Speaker 1: what the polling is actually telling us about later in 7 00:00:18,880 --> 00:00:22,360 Speaker 1: today's episode, but first Sam, take us through what people 8 00:00:22,440 --> 00:00:23,239 Speaker 1: might have missed. 9 00:00:22,960 --> 00:00:26,440 Speaker 2: Over the weekend. So over the weekend, Prime Minister Scott 10 00:00:26,440 --> 00:00:30,840 Speaker 2: Morrison indicated he would reintroduce a religious discrimination bill if 11 00:00:30,840 --> 00:00:33,640 Speaker 2: the Coalition was reelected at the federal election on the 12 00:00:33,680 --> 00:00:36,959 Speaker 2: twenty first of May. On the weekend, Morrison said, our 13 00:00:36,960 --> 00:00:39,839 Speaker 2: commitment was to go forward with the DA the Religious 14 00:00:39,840 --> 00:00:42,440 Speaker 2: Discrimination Bill, and we will go forward with the RDA 15 00:00:42,560 --> 00:00:44,760 Speaker 2: in its own right and I look forward to getting 16 00:00:44,760 --> 00:00:46,240 Speaker 2: that support in the Parliament. 17 00:00:46,840 --> 00:00:49,720 Speaker 1: A search is underway for missing victims of a blast 18 00:00:49,800 --> 00:00:52,800 Speaker 1: in a hotel in Havana on Friday. At least twenty 19 00:00:52,880 --> 00:00:56,000 Speaker 1: seven people were killed after an apparent gas leak caused 20 00:00:56,040 --> 00:00:59,680 Speaker 1: an explosion at the Hotel Saratoga. At least eighty one 21 00:00:59,720 --> 00:01:01,480 Speaker 1: peter or were injured in the blast. 22 00:01:02,160 --> 00:01:06,480 Speaker 2: The Taliban has introduced new rules across Afghanistan mandating women 23 00:01:06,560 --> 00:01:10,039 Speaker 2: to where an Islamic face fail when in public, meaning 24 00:01:10,160 --> 00:01:12,959 Speaker 2: they will be fully covered head to toe. If a 25 00:01:12,959 --> 00:01:15,920 Speaker 2: woman does not comply with the restrictions, her mail guardian, 26 00:01:16,080 --> 00:01:19,520 Speaker 2: usually a father, brother, or husband, would be visited by 27 00:01:19,640 --> 00:01:23,440 Speaker 2: Taliban officials. The man would potentially face a prison term 28 00:01:23,640 --> 00:01:26,600 Speaker 2: or a firing from state work if he works for 29 00:01:26,640 --> 00:01:27,240 Speaker 2: the Taliban. 30 00:01:27,880 --> 00:01:30,880 Speaker 1: Some good news in the democracy world. Early voting for 31 00:01:30,920 --> 00:01:34,720 Speaker 1: the upcoming federal election opens today, So if you're unable 32 00:01:34,760 --> 00:01:36,920 Speaker 1: to vote on election day, you can search for the 33 00:01:37,040 --> 00:01:40,479 Speaker 1: closest early voting booth near you and actually go and 34 00:01:40,560 --> 00:01:49,680 Speaker 1: cast your ballot from today. All right, So, political polling 35 00:01:49,920 --> 00:01:52,880 Speaker 1: can give us useful insights, but it can also be 36 00:01:52,920 --> 00:01:55,880 Speaker 1: misleading if it's presented without a grain of salt. And 37 00:01:55,960 --> 00:01:59,200 Speaker 1: that's what we learned after twenty nineteen, and indeed after 38 00:01:59,240 --> 00:02:03,200 Speaker 1: the twenty sixteen US election. There's two parts of getting 39 00:02:03,280 --> 00:02:06,440 Speaker 1: up to scratch in the world of political polling. Understanding 40 00:02:06,520 --> 00:02:09,320 Speaker 1: what it all means and understanding whether the polls are 41 00:02:09,480 --> 00:02:12,640 Speaker 1: accurate enough for us to listen to. So before we 42 00:02:12,639 --> 00:02:14,920 Speaker 1: get into what the polls actually mean and why we 43 00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:17,839 Speaker 1: should and shouldn't trust them. Why don't we go through 44 00:02:17,840 --> 00:02:20,519 Speaker 1: what the polls are saying right now about May twenty 45 00:02:20,520 --> 00:02:22,080 Speaker 1: first and the federal election. 46 00:02:22,960 --> 00:02:25,080 Speaker 2: So the last poll on the first of May from 47 00:02:25,200 --> 00:02:28,960 Speaker 2: prominent polling company News Poll, which is commissioned by News Corps, 48 00:02:29,320 --> 00:02:31,919 Speaker 2: had Labor at fifty three percent and the Coalition at 49 00:02:31,960 --> 00:02:36,720 Speaker 2: forty seven percent. Most recent polls have something in this ballpark, 50 00:02:36,880 --> 00:02:40,960 Speaker 2: a small but still significant lead to Labor. The Guardian's 51 00:02:41,120 --> 00:02:43,640 Speaker 2: Essential poll from the third of May has Labor leading 52 00:02:43,680 --> 00:02:47,360 Speaker 2: forty nine forty five, and they actually include an undecided number. 53 00:02:47,400 --> 00:02:51,080 Speaker 2: That undecided number is six percent. The Resolved Strategic poll 54 00:02:51,120 --> 00:02:54,280 Speaker 2: from nine newspapers has Labour up fifty four to forty six. 55 00:02:54,760 --> 00:02:57,240 Speaker 2: So all in all, if you had to push me 56 00:02:57,320 --> 00:02:59,320 Speaker 2: for a prediction, and I know that's not something you 57 00:02:59,360 --> 00:03:01,840 Speaker 2: and I liked to Douzara for what would happen if 58 00:03:01,880 --> 00:03:05,000 Speaker 2: an election was held today according to the polls, I 59 00:03:05,040 --> 00:03:08,040 Speaker 2: would say the Labor Party would probably win. So this 60 00:03:08,200 --> 00:03:10,440 Speaker 2: is kind of the best way to take a snapshot 61 00:03:10,480 --> 00:03:12,680 Speaker 2: of what the polls are saying right now. The two 62 00:03:12,800 --> 00:03:16,760 Speaker 2: party preferred indicator, it gives you two percentages adding up 63 00:03:16,760 --> 00:03:19,639 Speaker 2: to one hundred, which tells us who people prefer out 64 00:03:19,680 --> 00:03:23,919 Speaker 2: of Labor and the Coalition. But last election, infamously this 65 00:03:23,960 --> 00:03:27,360 Speaker 2: figure was wrong. Many polls had Labor leading around fifty 66 00:03:27,400 --> 00:03:29,720 Speaker 2: two to forty eight, but the actual result was about 67 00:03:29,760 --> 00:03:32,640 Speaker 2: fifty two to forty eight the other way to the Coalition. 68 00:03:32,960 --> 00:03:34,960 Speaker 1: It's hard to forget what that was like, given that 69 00:03:35,200 --> 00:03:37,200 Speaker 1: the whole country had braced for what they thought the 70 00:03:37,240 --> 00:03:39,360 Speaker 1: result would be. I mean, even Scott Morrison called it 71 00:03:39,400 --> 00:03:42,680 Speaker 1: a miracle. So what do people say was the general 72 00:03:42,720 --> 00:03:44,840 Speaker 1: problem with two party preferred polling? 73 00:03:45,280 --> 00:03:48,160 Speaker 2: Look, I guess it's not really about whether the numbers 74 00:03:48,240 --> 00:03:50,760 Speaker 2: were wrong in the poll. It's kind of more about 75 00:03:50,800 --> 00:03:53,840 Speaker 2: whether it's the wrong number to be concentrating on In 76 00:03:53,880 --> 00:03:57,000 Speaker 2: the first place. We have to remember Australian elections are 77 00:03:57,040 --> 00:03:59,960 Speaker 2: not decided by how many people vote for each party. Overall. 78 00:04:00,400 --> 00:04:03,320 Speaker 2: There are one hundred and fifty one separate races for 79 00:04:03,400 --> 00:04:06,120 Speaker 2: House of Rep seats all over the country, and each 80 00:04:06,160 --> 00:04:09,920 Speaker 2: one is to elect one person. These are the races 81 00:04:10,160 --> 00:04:13,960 Speaker 2: that determine who wins government. In reality, the major parties 82 00:04:14,000 --> 00:04:17,159 Speaker 2: are the main contender in most races. Seventy five percent 83 00:04:17,160 --> 00:04:19,599 Speaker 2: of people voted for a major party in twenty nineteen 84 00:04:19,960 --> 00:04:22,680 Speaker 2: and because of our preferential voting system, it means even 85 00:04:22,680 --> 00:04:25,120 Speaker 2: if you don't vote for one of the top two candidates, 86 00:04:25,440 --> 00:04:28,040 Speaker 2: your vote will likely end up counting for whichever one 87 00:04:28,080 --> 00:04:31,560 Speaker 2: you put above the other. So yes, the national two 88 00:04:31,600 --> 00:04:35,280 Speaker 2: party preferred number does tell us something. It's probably as 89 00:04:35,360 --> 00:04:39,480 Speaker 2: useful as a single snapshot quick hit number can be. However, 90 00:04:39,560 --> 00:04:42,640 Speaker 2: if we want to make some more thorough predictions about 91 00:04:42,640 --> 00:04:44,440 Speaker 2: who will win the election, we need to go a 92 00:04:44,480 --> 00:04:47,279 Speaker 2: little bit deeper into the polling and that's where we 93 00:04:47,320 --> 00:04:49,719 Speaker 2: start to bring in some of the other indicators. 94 00:04:50,000 --> 00:04:52,440 Speaker 1: Okay, and what are some of the insights that we 95 00:04:52,520 --> 00:04:55,760 Speaker 1: actually can glean from the polls? So we know what 96 00:04:55,800 --> 00:04:57,960 Speaker 1: the shortcomings out, but what can we glean from it? 97 00:04:58,200 --> 00:05:00,840 Speaker 2: I always like to look at the state state two 98 00:05:00,880 --> 00:05:04,600 Speaker 2: party preferred number. These are often quite different and reflect 99 00:05:04,680 --> 00:05:07,560 Speaker 2: different political moods in different parts of the country, so 100 00:05:07,640 --> 00:05:10,000 Speaker 2: breaking down the same number by state can give us 101 00:05:10,000 --> 00:05:13,520 Speaker 2: a clearer picture of where the fragilities for each party lies. 102 00:05:13,560 --> 00:05:16,320 Speaker 2: For example, the latest polls have Labour up fifty five 103 00:05:16,360 --> 00:05:19,440 Speaker 2: to forty five in Victoria and South Australia, but up 104 00:05:19,480 --> 00:05:22,800 Speaker 2: in Queensland it's fifty to fifty. Now the other important 105 00:05:22,800 --> 00:05:26,200 Speaker 2: polling number is primary votes. Primary votes tell us which 106 00:05:26,240 --> 00:05:28,880 Speaker 2: party people intend to put as number one on the 107 00:05:28,960 --> 00:05:32,320 Speaker 2: voting ballot, and this can include minor parties and independence, 108 00:05:32,680 --> 00:05:34,760 Speaker 2: and that changes things a little from the two party 109 00:05:34,800 --> 00:05:37,760 Speaker 2: preferred basis, which is just the two major parties. So 110 00:05:37,800 --> 00:05:40,640 Speaker 2: according to this indicator, the latest News poll has Labor 111 00:05:40,680 --> 00:05:43,560 Speaker 2: on thirty eight percent, the Coalition on thirty six percent. 112 00:05:43,760 --> 00:05:46,360 Speaker 2: Then we've got the Greens on eleven percent, one Nation 113 00:05:46,440 --> 00:05:48,960 Speaker 2: on five percent, and then ten percent is spread out 114 00:05:48,960 --> 00:05:53,160 Speaker 2: around Independence and others. Then another interesting way to look 115 00:05:53,160 --> 00:05:56,080 Speaker 2: at the polls is preferred prime minister. Now, remember we 116 00:05:56,160 --> 00:05:59,560 Speaker 2: don't vote directly for the prime minister, but the approval 117 00:05:59,600 --> 00:06:02,880 Speaker 2: ratings of Scott Morrison and Anthony Alberesi can give us 118 00:06:02,880 --> 00:06:05,479 Speaker 2: a bit of an insight into how people are feeling 119 00:06:05,560 --> 00:06:09,440 Speaker 2: about the political parties. On that measure, Scott Morrison leads 120 00:06:09,440 --> 00:06:12,719 Speaker 2: Anthony Albanesi forty five to thirty nine in the latest 121 00:06:12,720 --> 00:06:13,200 Speaker 2: News poll. 122 00:06:13,279 --> 00:06:15,520 Speaker 1: All right, to Sam, is there a type of polling 123 00:06:15,560 --> 00:06:18,080 Speaker 1: that experts say is the most accurate? 124 00:06:18,440 --> 00:06:20,080 Speaker 2: Well, it kind of goes to that point I raised 125 00:06:20,120 --> 00:06:23,120 Speaker 2: earlier about how the fact that the election is one 126 00:06:23,200 --> 00:06:27,080 Speaker 2: hundred and fifty one individual races, So therefore the most 127 00:06:27,080 --> 00:06:31,159 Speaker 2: accurate polling is looking at individual seats and trying to 128 00:06:31,160 --> 00:06:34,360 Speaker 2: bring all of that data together. But there's another problem here, 129 00:06:34,400 --> 00:06:37,440 Speaker 2: and that problem is that getting enough people to participate 130 00:06:37,640 --> 00:06:41,240 Speaker 2: in results for individual seats is really hard. We do 131 00:06:41,320 --> 00:06:44,040 Speaker 2: see some seat by seat polling, but much of it 132 00:06:44,080 --> 00:06:47,120 Speaker 2: is conducted by political parties themselves to get a bit 133 00:06:47,120 --> 00:06:49,800 Speaker 2: of a performance review of where they need to concentrate 134 00:06:49,839 --> 00:06:53,479 Speaker 2: their efforts on more, and these are not really provided 135 00:06:53,520 --> 00:06:56,520 Speaker 2: to the media. That often, seat by seat polling can 136 00:06:56,560 --> 00:07:00,400 Speaker 2: be particularly useful for predicting unconventional races, like the ones 137 00:07:00,480 --> 00:07:05,679 Speaker 2: where we're seeing high profile independence challenging traditionally safe liberal seats. 138 00:07:05,800 --> 00:07:08,880 Speaker 1: This election, as I said a bit earlier, we all 139 00:07:08,920 --> 00:07:12,400 Speaker 1: know that the polls were wildly unreliable last time. What 140 00:07:12,440 --> 00:07:14,920 Speaker 1: do the experts say is the reason for that. 141 00:07:15,520 --> 00:07:17,840 Speaker 2: It's a super interesting discussion to have. So as I 142 00:07:17,880 --> 00:07:20,800 Speaker 2: said earlier, they predicted a fifty two to forty eight 143 00:07:21,200 --> 00:07:23,640 Speaker 2: win to Labor. In fact, it was fifty two to 144 00:07:23,680 --> 00:07:28,000 Speaker 2: forty eight to the Coalition. Interestingly, after the twenty nineteen election, 145 00:07:28,200 --> 00:07:30,880 Speaker 2: some of the big polling companies, some that I've mentioned 146 00:07:30,880 --> 00:07:33,800 Speaker 2: in this podcast decided to form a body called the 147 00:07:33,840 --> 00:07:37,000 Speaker 2: Australian Polling Council, and this was so they could share 148 00:07:37,040 --> 00:07:40,360 Speaker 2: basic information like how they wait their polling samples, because 149 00:07:40,600 --> 00:07:43,640 Speaker 2: in all honesty, everyone was pretty shocked with how wrong 150 00:07:43,760 --> 00:07:47,680 Speaker 2: everyone got it last time. It was an industry wide suffer. 151 00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:50,080 Speaker 2: If we zoom out a little bit, the polling industry 152 00:07:50,080 --> 00:07:52,160 Speaker 2: has been going through a rough time after getting a 153 00:07:52,240 --> 00:07:56,160 Speaker 2: number of huge calls totally wrong. They didn't predict that 154 00:07:56,240 --> 00:07:59,160 Speaker 2: Donald Trump would win the twenty sixteen US election, they 155 00:07:59,200 --> 00:08:01,760 Speaker 2: didn't predict that the UK would vote to leave the 156 00:08:01,760 --> 00:08:04,840 Speaker 2: European Union, and they failed to call a number of 157 00:08:04,880 --> 00:08:08,480 Speaker 2: key elections in Europe over the last three or four years. Now. 158 00:08:08,480 --> 00:08:10,680 Speaker 2: It's thought to be down to what analysts call the 159 00:08:10,760 --> 00:08:13,360 Speaker 2: non response bias, and this is the idea that so 160 00:08:13,480 --> 00:08:17,520 Speaker 2: many members of the public distrust the established media, including 161 00:08:17,520 --> 00:08:20,560 Speaker 2: the polls that established media run, so they didn't respond 162 00:08:20,600 --> 00:08:22,880 Speaker 2: to the polls. There's also a little bit of research 163 00:08:22,920 --> 00:08:25,720 Speaker 2: around shyness in polling. This is the idea that people 164 00:08:25,720 --> 00:08:29,640 Speaker 2: are increasingly likely to lie to political pulses because they 165 00:08:29,640 --> 00:08:31,920 Speaker 2: don't want to be judged. So I guess at the 166 00:08:32,000 --> 00:08:34,839 Speaker 2: end of the day, good political polling is really about 167 00:08:34,880 --> 00:08:37,840 Speaker 2: getting a good sample of the community to answer the 168 00:08:37,880 --> 00:08:41,400 Speaker 2: same question. Now, all credit to the polling companies, this 169 00:08:41,520 --> 00:08:46,920 Speaker 2: is a really tricky task. You have to think about age, income, geography, education, 170 00:08:47,080 --> 00:08:51,000 Speaker 2: status and a number of other factors. There has been 171 00:08:51,160 --> 00:08:53,880 Speaker 2: a huge amount of review into the polling from the 172 00:08:53,880 --> 00:08:57,040 Speaker 2: twenty nineteen election by the Australian Polling Council and a 173 00:08:57,120 --> 00:09:00,000 Speaker 2: number of other industry bodies and the political parties themselves 174 00:09:00,000 --> 00:09:03,080 Speaker 2: elves and they say the key fault with the polls 175 00:09:03,160 --> 00:09:05,640 Speaker 2: last time was that they were two weighted by people 176 00:09:05,679 --> 00:09:09,040 Speaker 2: who were more engaged with politics and more likely to 177 00:09:09,120 --> 00:09:12,280 Speaker 2: have a bachelor's degree or higher. Now both of these 178 00:09:12,320 --> 00:09:15,400 Speaker 2: factors are associated with stronger levels of support for the 179 00:09:15,520 --> 00:09:19,640 Speaker 2: Labor Party. Obviously, this time around, polling companies have tried 180 00:09:19,679 --> 00:09:22,840 Speaker 2: to incorporate the lessons from the last election to generate 181 00:09:22,880 --> 00:09:25,400 Speaker 2: more accurate results. But we'll have to wait and see 182 00:09:25,480 --> 00:09:28,000 Speaker 2: until election night to see if the polls are on 183 00:09:28,080 --> 00:09:28,560 Speaker 2: the money. 184 00:09:28,840 --> 00:09:31,600 Speaker 1: I think everyone is now approaching polls with a healthy 185 00:09:31,600 --> 00:09:34,760 Speaker 1: dose of skepticism after what happened in twenty nineteen, so 186 00:09:34,800 --> 00:09:38,200 Speaker 1: it'll be interesting to see if faith in the polling 187 00:09:38,200 --> 00:09:42,640 Speaker 1: industry is restored post May twenty one. Until then, we 188 00:09:42,720 --> 00:09:46,120 Speaker 1: have got a jam packed agenda of breaking down the 189 00:09:46,160 --> 00:09:49,319 Speaker 1: news and politics view every single day. If you want 190 00:09:49,320 --> 00:09:51,720 Speaker 1: to learn more about where the major parties stand on 191 00:09:51,760 --> 00:09:54,840 Speaker 1: different policies, follow us on Instagram at the Daily Oosits, 192 00:09:54,880 --> 00:09:57,400 Speaker 1: wherever three hundred and fifty thousand Aussies get their news 193 00:09:57,440 --> 00:09:59,480 Speaker 1: every day and we would love to have you over there. 194 00:10:00,040 --> 00:10:00,640 Speaker 1: Great Monday,