WEBVTT - SARAH WALKER - THE TWELVE s2 - FOXTEL

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:01.720
<v Speaker 1>It's in the news today, but it was actually on

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>TV Reload, the podcast Last Deep Their Life. Hey guys,

0:00:04.960 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to TV Reload. I want to thank you,

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of course for clicking and downloading on today's episode with

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Walker, one of the executive producers and writers of

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>The Twelve, which is on series two on Foxtel at

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 1>the moment it's kind of mid season. I have to

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>say that I'm a big fan of Sarah's work over

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the years, and in a past podcast contract that I

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>had before I did TV Reload, I featured LGBT I

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Guess that talked about their backstory and in some ways

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it was my chat with Sarah that made me think

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.279
<v Speaker 1>about my passion of television, that made me think I

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>was better suited to talking about television. So you know, look,

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a bit of trivia there for those who have

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>been listening to this podcast since the start. Sarah is

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a highly experienced Austrayan author, screenwriter and script producer. She

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>was the lead writer on Lingo BBC one's ratings hit

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>thriller The Secret that She Keeps, which played out here

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>on Foxtel. She co created Network Ten's one and was

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>this script executive on the prison drama Wentworth, which I

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>absolutely loved. I will ask her today about the future

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of The twelve and how important Sam Neil is in

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the continuation of this story. I will ask about the

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>nature of Fox Tell's productions and how Brian Walsh's legacy

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>has played a part in making scripted drama moving forward.

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>This season of The Twelve feels a little easier to follow,

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's rare that a second series is better than

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the first, So I will ask about the notes that

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>we're given before they went back into the writer's room

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to create this series. We will even get an update

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>on the work that Sarah has been doing with Charlie's

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>thereon Oh My God, amazing. She's been working with her

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>for quite a few years on a few projects that

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>haven't quite seen the light of day, but I believe

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>when they do will be quite amazing. There's actually so

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>much to talk about with Sarah, and I absolutely love

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>talking to her. You can hear that in the chat.

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>She's very passionate about television. Guys, sit back and relax

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>as we delve deeper into the production of how they

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>made The twelve series two. When Yeah, I really hope

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy this chat.

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 2>How are you, Ben? Are you good?

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm so excited to talk to you because, as you

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>would know, I've been in your audience for so long,

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and I actually had you as a guest in a

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast that I previously did five years ago where we

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about your LGBTI legendary status amongst the media. But

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>here we are, five years later talking again.

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think legendary is probably pushing it, but I'm

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 2>very glad that you can say that.

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>What a great opportunity to talk today about the twelve

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Just so amazing. You've obviously been kicking some serious goals

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>since we last spoke.

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:40.959
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we've had the wonderful opportunity to come on to

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 2>a show that stars Sam Neil and is super elite.

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 2>I think in terms of Australian television, it's a huge show.

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 2>It's got so many characters and so many storylines and threads,

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 2>so it's a real challenge. But I was invited on

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 2>season one as a writer and a kind of co

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 2>producer with Brad Winters, and then ultimately in production. I

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 2>took over the second half of the production to see

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 2>it through. And we're talking about season three, which is great.

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, this is the thing about the show. It really

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 1>does lend itself. I mean, the idea is genius because

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we can just come back and see Samuel back there

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in that role and get twelve new characters for us

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to win best our time in. It's fantastic.

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's kind of like an anthology series in

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 2>that respect. We've got our lead, wonderful, cheeky criminal barrister

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 2>in Sam Neil's so charming, and as you say, each

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 2>series is a new crime and twelve new people that

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 2>we're exploring. You know, because of that, it's actually quite

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 2>challenging because most series, now, you know, when you open

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 2>up for the first episode, you've got usually a single

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 2>protagonist or maybe two, and all you're doing is setting

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 2>up those two people and their journey how it's going

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 2>to go. But on this one, we've got you know,

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 2>at least four core durors plus eight more, and then

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 2>we've got the crime and all the people associated with it,

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 2>and Sam's character and whoever his rival is. So you know,

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 2>it's a really tricky to kind of get it out

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 2>of the gates fast and set everything up. But it's

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 2>a challenge that I'm enjoying.

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I did feel like this time around, for me, it

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>felt a little bit more succinct. There wasn't as much

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>left unanswered for the audience to try and interpret. So

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious about what notes will passed down from series

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>one to series two.

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a good question. I think there were notes

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 2>passed down from series one to series two in that

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 2>we should reduce the number of core Duror stories, So

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 2>rather than trying to follow all twelve to a kind

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 2>of even or close, we should choose maybe four major

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 2>storylines and use that, and the other jurors become not

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:58.679
<v Speaker 2>invisible at all because they've all got opinions about the case,

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 2>and they also become engaged with those core characters that

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 2>we're following, and I think that's why it felt much

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 2>more manageable to both write and watch. But I also think,

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 2>you know, we were basing our first season on the

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 2>twelve from Belgium, the original creators, so we were kind

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 2>of guided by the model that they'd used and the

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 2>way they'd done it, and in season two I was

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 2>able to take over. We haven't based anything in season

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 2>two on anything from the original creators except for the

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 2>model of the show and how it comes, so I

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 2>was able. I felt more comfortable taking I guess agency

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 2>with that and making decisions made it a lot easier.

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I remember talking to Penny when about this,

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 1>about not treating the audience though as though they're stupid,

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>always remembering to treat the audience like they are intelligent,

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's what this drama feels like for me.

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>We don't know exactly where it's going to go, and

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>it's that's how it maintains your engagement level is by

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>not giving away everything and setting so many things up

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>that your brain can has to process.

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 2>I've been extremely heartened by the response to both season

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 2>one and season two because you have it beaten into

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 2>you that the audience you have to come out of

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 2>the gates really fast, give the audience a lot of information,

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 2>hook them up and tell the story so they don't

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 2>get bored. And I really believed, I have always believed

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 2>that Australian audiences and audiences everywhere are intelligent and if

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 2>you give them something that's genuinely solid and good, that

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 2>it's just like having a nourishing meal, they'll take their

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 2>time and they'll allow you the time to do that

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 2>instead of having this fast food model where you kind

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 2>of shove it in your mouth and stick it down

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 2>and it gives you all of those great kind of

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.239
<v Speaker 2>feelings in the first ten minutes and then you're hungry later.

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 2>I really feel like happy that audiences will sit with

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 2>these and we'll sit with the show, and we'll sit

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 2>with the crime and it's more of a slow burn

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 2>in terms of storytelling, but I really believe people are

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 2>more hooked than they are by the other version.

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right. What you have been able to

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>do is really make it our own and make it

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>very Australian, which I think is great. How does that

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>work in terms of global appeal outside of Australia. What's

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the reaction been to other countries watching the series?

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, we don't get a lot of information

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 2>about the international viewership, but I understand that in the

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 2>UK it's gone through the roof, and I think everybody

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 2>in the industry at the moment is really interested in

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 2>getting becificity around characters and places. It's what intrigues people.

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 2>So people watching from overseas may not have seen these

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of areas portrayed in Australia like this, is suburbia.

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 2>These are real people's houses. They're not all beautiful harbor

0:07:56.280 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 2>views or beaches, and so I feel like there's a

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 2>real interest in what it is to live in Australia

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 2>or be in Australian that we're presenting in a way

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 2>that it hasn't often been presented before.

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I think you've captivated that community spirit really well. There's

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>something quite fascinating about slowing it down and taking it

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>out of a metro environment and putting it into this

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>rural setting, because it does feel a little bit more contained.

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>With that a conversation that you're having, you're like, Okay,

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>well we want to slow this down so audiences can

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>keep up with us. Let's take them to this smaller setting.

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't so much about slowing it down. It was

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 2>more about what would happen if you had a big trial.

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, we were intrigued by the fact that the

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 2>juries are peaked from your peer group, But what happens

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 2>in a small town, a very small town when courts,

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court has what they call the circuit and

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 2>all of the lawyers and the judge go on a

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 2>little trip around the regional areas and all of the

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 2>main cases that are too big for local courts there

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 2>are heard in this traveling Supreme Court. It's called the circuit,

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 2>but as we refer to in the show, they call

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 2>it the circus the lawyers themselves because it is really

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 2>like a rolling show. And I think we all found

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 2>it intriguing. These people are supposed to be judged by

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 2>a jury of their peers, but their peers are from

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 2>the same small town or that same region, and so

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 2>how can you be judged both fairly by people who

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 2>probably haven't an idea of a view or have heard

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 2>the stories, but also if the jury knows each other

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 2>as well, that was kind of intriguing, whereas in the

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 2>city scape we can't have, you know that the jury,

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 2>none of the jury members would know each other. But

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 2>we felt like it added a whole new layer and

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 2>texture to the jury room.

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>It does, and I think I like the overall question

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>can the twelve really be impartial when they come from

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>such that tight rural community, And that's what's fascinating about

0:09:58.880 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 1>this series.

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, can anyone? Though, I mean, it's one thing we

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 2>all ask about juries. They're human beings, you know, dealing

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 2>with things outside our workplace and in this case, they're

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of contained in a workplace that is the jury.

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, when things are going wrong in your home life,

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 2>or if things are triggered by you know, things that

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 2>you're hearing in the trial, you're triggering personal things. You know,

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 2>You're all bringing your preconceptions and your own ethics and

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 2>your own life story to this case. And I guess

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:33.319
<v Speaker 2>that's one of the things that we always want to explore,

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 2>is how the case is affecting the jury's current life

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 2>and vice versa. How is the juror's current life affecting

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 2>their perception of the trial. I think that's one of

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 2>the fascinating questions.

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>What about Sam Neil we were talking about, you know,

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>this series could do series three, you could do series ten,

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>like could go for a long time. What do you thought, Well,

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 1>do we have to always have Sam Neil? Do you

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's imperative? Did you wait to hear that Sam

0:10:57.480 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Neil was going to do it before going ahead with

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>series two? Was that a crucial element?

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to say, from a personal place, what is

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 2>anything without Sam? Now? I love I mean, I love

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 2>this man. I you know, I could honestly sit and

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 2>listen to him reading anything and just be fascinated because

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:21.839
<v Speaker 2>he's so charming and such a wonderful screen presence. Technically, no,

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 2>we could have. When we first started the plans for

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.959
<v Speaker 2>season two, we didn't think Sam would come back. Wow,

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 2>it never you know, we just didn't have that on

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 2>the radar, and so you know, we were questioning, are

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 2>there any characters that we want to have back from

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 2>season one? Or could you just start fresh? And I

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 2>think we all agreed that you could have started fresh

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 2>in the second season. I think now that we've had

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Sam back, and thankfully he did come back, because he

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 2>adds so much to it, I would hate to go

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 2>forward without him. I mean, technically it's possible, because you

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 2>could obviously, since it isn't that anthology sense, you could

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 2>find yourself in and another season and with another group

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 2>of lawyers or even you know, perhaps a prosecutor instead.

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 2>But I would hope that we don't it doesn't come

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 2>to that, because I think he would be a loss.

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 1>You can't set up sort of Kabakova or whatever it

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:17.199
<v Speaker 1>was from Murder she wrote, and not have Angela Lansbury back.

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:22.559
<v Speaker 2>You know what I mean, right, Yeah, he's definitely a

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 2>crucial piece of the puzzle for me anyway, then let's

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 2>see how we roll.

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, I had a lot of conversations to with

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Brian Walsh while the first season of the twelve was

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 1>going into production, and I heard about his passion for

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.959
<v Speaker 1>this series. He really believed in this series. I would

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>like to know from you, because I know you've got

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to work with him. What was one of some of

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 1>your memories about working with Brian Walsh with getting this

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>series together that you cherish?

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 2>I guess, oh, look specifically, I mean, God love Brian.

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 2>He was really such an amazing part of our industry

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 2>and he's still sadly missed. So yeah, look, he was

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 2>just enthusiastic. I think when you've got Brian's enthusiasm, you

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 2>feel like you're just on the right path and you

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 2>can't you know, you feel very supported and buoyed by that.

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 2>I can remember pitching him the Crime for the second season,

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 2>and that was on a zoom and obviously with other

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 2>members of the team, including Penny Win, but he listened.

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 2>There was just silence, as there often is when I'm

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 2>talking about a story and you kind of don't know

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 2>how it's going down so well when it's on a

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 2>pitch because you know, seeing people's faces, there's often like

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 2>six seven people all in little boxes on the screen.

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 2>But I remember him saying something like I can't remember

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 2>the exact words, but he was like, this is fantastic,

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 2>this is amazing, And so your heart just goes through

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 2>the roof because you know that you've got Brian's support

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 2>and you know that he feels safe that you're going

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 2>to deliver something that he's going to enjoy. And all

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 2>I remember is the enthusiasm and very few notes, which

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 2>is also fantastic When that happens, that's a compliment within itself.

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 2>What does a Foxtel look like though now without Brian?

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Like Allison Hubert Burns is there and well she'd been

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 2>there working with Brian for quite a few years at

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 2>that point. How has Foxtel changed making a show? Have

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 2>you noticed his absence? I look, it's hard to take

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Brian out of a situation and not feel there's some

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of whole. But I think it's more about, you know,

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 2>genuinely missing him as a person. And he had incredible

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 2>energy and the kind of thrusting energy around the projects

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 2>and around people, and he would grab new talent and

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of say we need something for this person, and

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 2>so there was a lot of development kind of push

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 2>around Brian that I'm not sure whether that is still

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 2>the case there, but I know that from my experience

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 2>on this season, they're incredibly involved. Penny Winners is a

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 2>wonderful consultant for them, and you know, she gives us

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 2>thoughts that I think would echo what Brian's were and

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 2>her own of course, and Ali Herbert Burns came with

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 2>us on ARECI recently, so we all spent like three

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 2>days down in a regional area of Western Australia and

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 2>it was wonderful to have her there because you really

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 2>felt like she was bringing the same kind of support,

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 2>interest and passion to the project that Brian bought. And

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 2>I really don't think there's been any change to the

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 2>level of expertise or interest that there's still you know,

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 2>a wonderful team absolutely.

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting our contribution to scripted drama here

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>in Australia has just really leveled up in the last

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. You know, we side settle HBO dramas

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and you can see the level of our achievement has

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>just is matching that. What do you think the biggest

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>difference is in all the biggest change in the way

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>we approach storytelling here in Australia.

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 2>I think part of it is the fact that we're

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 2>now as an industry having to rely on co productions

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 2>with America and the UK much more than we ever had. Therefore,

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 2>our storytelling needs to be much more globle because people,

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 2>even though we're telling specific Australian's stories, the way we

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 2>tell them has to be more sophisticated at a global level.

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 2>I think there's been an understanding that some of the

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 2>more conventional, older ways of telling stories in Australian TV

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 2>are no longer going to fly globally. You've got a

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 2>whole bunch of new emerging voices coming through who are

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 2>very literate to how stories can be told in ways

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 2>that aren't conventional, or their personal stories so that you

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 2>know they have a personal spin on the way they're told.

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 2>I think all these factors are changing our storytelling for

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 2>the better. I think I felt like a lot of

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 2>my career I was boxed into the conventions according to

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Australian TV, and now you know we're able to go, well,

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 2>how about we just tell the story well let's not

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 2>do it by a formula, and I think that's an

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 2>incredibly good thing for the industry.

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that that can be then adopted by

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>some of those long running soaps that you've worked on,

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, at different times you've worked on Home and

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Away and Neighbors at different points of your career. Do

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you think that sort of learning in telling stories will

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>be adopted by them or do you think that those

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>sorts of soaps are still stuck in that sort of

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>formula that they know that works.

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Home and Away and Neighbors are their own animal and

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 2>they're very, very, very successful. So what they're doing has

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 2>always worked and possibly will always work. I think the

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 2>way that those the production demands on those shows, I mean,

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 2>it's almost impossible to do it any other way. You know,

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 2>they're putting out so much material, and I don't think

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 2>they're really need change. They are successful as themselves. I

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 2>admire everybody who's working on that kind of show that's

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 2>turning out like two and a half hours of television

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 2>a week.

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, when we spoke last time, you were talking

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to me about a project you're working on, and all

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you told me was Charlie's thereon. That's all I think

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 1>we touched upon and you couldn't say anything more. But

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I've dug something up on the internet. So like I

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>found Charlie's Barn's production company Denver and Delilah on a

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>pilot for HBO. Is what you're working with them to

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>get this project up and running. What can you tell

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 1>me about this project? Is this still happening?

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 2>It is notionally still happening, or we've had a couple

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 2>of things. I was working with her on another project

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 2>some years ago, like five or six years ago, and

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 2>actually this was set up at Netflix and we you know,

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 2>COVID hit and that show was to be shot in

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 2>four different countries, so that obviously had to go on

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 2>the back burner. And then of course post COVID, which

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 2>you know, it was there for two years, and then

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 2>post COVID, the option on the book could run out

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 2>and things had changed, and so I think that that's

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 2>now on the back burner. And then she asked me

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 2>to be part of another fantastic project, which was an

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 2>HBO pilot which I wrote, and then we had the

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 2>writer's strike and so I feel like and then by

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 2>the time that came back again, the option had run

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 2>out on the book, and there'd been a documentary series

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 2>of the same project put out and had run all

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 2>through the writer's strike. And I think it was felt

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 2>by HBO that the audience for that, even though it

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 2>was really good, it wasn't high enough to warrant doing

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 2>a period drama series. But you know, Charlie's is fierce,

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 2>and she's you know, an incredible producer, and she'll no

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 2>doubt take it elsewhere and it will have its day.

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 2>But at the moment, we're just in a little what would.

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I say, Well, we really suddenly seeing the real effects

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of what that righter stroke is at the moment, you

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean. Funny, you can go to the cinemas.

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I was only at the movies the other night. And

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I worked at the cinemas as growing up, so even

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>on a weeknight, people went to the movies. And you

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean. Was that the movies the other day?

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>And I said to the guy that was serving as,

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I said, you know, is it quiet at the moment?

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>He said, it's really quiet. You know, because back in

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the day, we would have a Gladiator coming out every week.

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, we would have Wicked coming out every week,

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>which is two big movies that are about to happen.

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's sad that, you know, we're in the midst

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of that. But I guess there's also so much of

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>our viewers and our attendance to go to see the

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 1>movies and now watching television. You know, there's also a

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>big element.

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 2>It's it is demoralizing what's happened to cinema. And I

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 2>mean as a person who has an incredibly long term

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 2>film buff and my you know, my goals and dreams

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 2>are around film, like the ultimate is you know, winning

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 2>an Academy Award. That's still the ultimate for me. But

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 2>in this environment where films are no longer being made

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 2>in the same amount, people aren't going to the cinema.

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Even myself. I used to go once or twice a

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 2>week because there'd always been a new film out on

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 2>the Thursday, and whether that was at an Arthouse film

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 2>and I was off to the Palace Cinema or I

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 2>was going to you know, Hoitts, I would be there

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 2>at least once a week. And now I can't remember

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 2>the last time I went to a film at the cinema.

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 2>So I'm a die hard film buff, and yet I

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 2>no longer go. I wait until it's on television. So

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 2>I can't even you know, I can't even be and

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 2>ferocious about that because I'm falling into the same trap.

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 2>It was really COVID that did us in. You know,

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 2>up until then, we were getting a lot of content

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 2>coming every week, and so you were kind of there

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 2>and you wanted to see it before it went off,

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 2>and because next week there'd be something else, and so

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 2>there was a kind of momentum to those releases. I'm

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 2>definitely going to go and see Deadpool, But in the meantime,

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I think what's happening is I am really hopeful because

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 2>of the projects that are on my desk at the

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 2>moment or my slate, several of them are wonderful feature films,

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 2>and these are coming in. I've never had so many

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 2>feature films on my slate, and I was I've discovered,

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, I believe that it's because, you know, with

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:22.479
<v Speaker 2>all the algorithms out there at the moment, there's been

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 2>an understanding that people only watch three episodes of a

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 2>series that they're not going to watch. They'll give it

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 2>three episodes and then if they don't like it, they

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 2>don't watch anymore. So you know, the big companies are

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 2>spending If they've created a series it's got eight episodes

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 2>in it, that means five episodes worth of content aren't

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 2>being watched by the majority of people that you know,

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 2>and so that's a lot of money that's down the

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 2>drain in terms of content. If each episode is being

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 2>made for five million dollars, and that's like twenty five

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 2>million dollars of content that's down the drain, and it's

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 2>a risk. So I think that the big company is

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 2>a big broadcasters now are going, okay, well, three episodes,

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 2>this is the equivalent of one feature film. So if

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 2>we get people, if they'll give it a shot for

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 2>that amount of time, then what we should do is

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 2>make stuff that is that long. So some of the

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 2>big streamers now are starting to turn two lower budget films,

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 2>films sort of under ten million or under fifteen million,

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 2>and that will create not only hopefully much better content

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 2>and a much more people staying for it giving it

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the whole film, but it will also invite a lot

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 2>of risk taking, so that you've got many more emerging directors, writers,

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 2>actors who are going to have an opportunity to do

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.479
<v Speaker 2>it a film under ten million dollars and have it

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 2>bought by the streamers and have it shown. And I

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 2>believe that that process over time will reignite people's excitement

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 2>about film and perhaps put us back in the cinemas again.

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Interesting though, with going to the cinema, I'm such a

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 1>like because I grew up with it. I love the

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 1>community of being in a theater to watch something. It

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>can really change the perception of the product. Like I've

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>been in cinemas where you know people laughing or people reacting.

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing like that community of being there like that

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and knowing that it has such a powerful effect on

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>how well you enjoy the show. I feel like cinema

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 1>is worth being protected, and I would pay to go

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and see the Twelve in the cinemas. Is it just

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>me that is thinking that we could put some of these?

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Sarah, I remember watching Mayor of Eastown because

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Fox John Binge had it, and we had a screening

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of the first two episodes to watch Marraor of Eastown

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in the cinema, and I just remember being like, it

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 1>was so amazing. I mean, Kate Winslet's obviously the protagonist

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 1>of that story and She's a known film actor, so

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>it was not unreally like unusual to see her on screen.

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>But I just was like, I feel like people would

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>pay money to watch some of these series in theaters.

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.400
<v Speaker 2>I think that's fantastic, Like I mean an eight hour

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 2>cinema experience, or a six hour cinema experience. I guess

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 2>it'd be what. It's actually a great thing to explore.

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 2>I think you should be the person who brings it

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 2>to the to the world.

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, in particular or any of these places

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>should just have a HBO cinema, you know what I mean,

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>what's really interesting.

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 2>It's a great idea, and you could kind of loop

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 2>it so that people could come in an episode, you know,

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 2>if they only watch too that can come back and

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 2>watch the rest.

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be quite amazing and immersive.

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 2>I agree. And in fact, you know you're saying about

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 2>the cinema, about the screening that you went to. Nearly

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 2>all of our TV shows have a cinema screening to start.

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 2>They'll usually show two episodes to all the cast and crew,

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 2>sometimes also to reviewers, and you get to see it

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 2>in this big form, and because you know, we have

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:59.239
<v Speaker 2>such wonderful directors and talent now dops working with us that.

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, it is a great experience to sit there

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 2>and watch it and it's not at all the same

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 2>as being on television. It's you know, something gets lost

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 2>in that. And so I agree with you. I think

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:11.679
<v Speaker 2>it would be wonderful. Let's find a way to do

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 2>it happen.

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I remember someone was watching that Mayor of Eastown episode

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>and leaned over and said, I think it was to

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:22.360
<v Speaker 1>d Or. It was maybe to Brian, who was down

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 1>for that screening of that first episode of Mayor of Eastown.

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 1>The two episodes finished, and they said, well, can you

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>play the next episode? Can you play this? You know,

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to stay there. They were willing to go

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and buy them more red wine and come and sit

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>back down and keep watching.

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Well. I had the same experience when I watched Tim

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Mention's upright, yeah, because I think they played the whole

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:45.159
<v Speaker 2>thing and it was half hours, you know, but it

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 2>was it was long. And my intention had been to

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 2>leave after two, you know, to come and say hello

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 2>and show my face and kiss you know people, and

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 2>then watch the past two episodes. And I couldn't leave.

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 2>I sat there. I was not going ending where and

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 2>it was fantastic to watch it in that and I

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 2>was just absolutely riveted for the whole thing and excited

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 2>to see something complete as well, you know, the whole

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 2>story movie marathons.

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember them? They had movie marathons in the nineties,

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>like back to back, breach of features, put me in there.

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'd sit there at the pastoor in those

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable astor seats and watched at least eight hours of

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the show.

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 2>It's true.

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I honestly I've over I'm over time. I would

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>just enjoy spending so much time with you and just

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:35.920
<v Speaker 1>talking to you because I just so fascinating. Well, I

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 1>feel like that with the rest of Australia is watching

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>this show at the moment, we're sort of on the

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>same roller coaster and trying to work out if Patrick

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and Sasha are innocent or guilty. Have you got any

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:48.239
<v Speaker 1>any tips for the viewers that are watching it at

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 1>this point, anything that they should be looking out for.

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>How what can you tell us before we get towards.

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, all I can tell you is that the twists

0:27:56.880 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 2>keep coming. There's you know, it's I don't think you

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 2>can never I think you know the intent was to

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:06.159
<v Speaker 2>make sure that people were never quite sure. And we

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 2>have really some really great storylines coming up or moments

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 2>coming up that will change your mind or reconfirm what

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 2>you already think. I can't speak enough about how wonderful

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 2>a performance is by Amy Matthews, and I think in

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of episodes even more so, I think

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 2>that people will be really satisfied as they go along.

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's a moment. In fact, it's one

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 2>of those series that I would say continues to kind

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 2>of grow in its momentum as it does. You know,

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 2>some can fall off towards the end. I think this

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 2>is the reverse, and so I'm hoping people will be

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 2>excited to keep watching.

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I am with that person. Can I just say I

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>watched episodes four and five just before we chatted, and

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>so I was like, how do I write to d

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Who do I write to?

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 2>It?

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Foxtel to just give me more episodes. Amy reminds me

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of like a young Sigourney Weaver, you know, like there's

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>something very fresh and dynamic about her acting that makes

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>me think of Sigourney in some weird way. I don't

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>know if I'm alone with that, so people listening to

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the podcast hit me up if you feel the same.

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>But she's incredible, incredible.

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 2>She is. I worked with her a long time ago

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 2>on Home and Away, in fact, and I had her

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 2>marked as someone who is an exceptional actor, and so

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 2>it was wonderful for me to see her come back

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 2>into my orbit on this show and to prove in

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 2>fact she was everything that I had always thought. And

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 2>it's wonderful to see someone who as appearing seemingly a

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 2>fresh face or someone you know, people haven't seen a

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of I've had so many producers come up to

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 2>me and say that actress playing the lead role Amy mathis,

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 2>where did she come from? And I'm thinking, well, she

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 2>was here twenty years ago. She just hasn't had that

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 2>moment in you know, for quite a while, and I'm

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 2>so happy to see her having it.

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Give her the awards, give you that I want to

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>everyone to be please acknowledge for the show, everyone who

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>joins the pot. I finished on this question, what is

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>something from behind the scene, something we as an audience

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>won't know or won't get a chance to know, sort

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of a behind the scene secret of making the second

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>series of the twelve if you can help us with

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>something a funny anecdote or a bump in the road

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>or something that had happened along the way.

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Look, I've gone blank, but I can say that we

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 2>were filming in New York, which is the most fabulous

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 2>talent for filming because it's just completely untouched. It's like

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 2>a straight out of the Wild West. And I can

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 2>remember going down the street with Sam Neil and there

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 2>wasn't I think practically the shops were all closed. Everybody

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 2>was running out on the street to catch a glimpse

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 2>of him, and I think the excitement around that was wonderful.

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 2>And I said to him, Oh, Sam, you know, what

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 2>are you going to do? Like he said, I'm do

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 2>you know that there's the only sock factory left in

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 2>I think I don't know whether it was Western Australia

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 2>or Australia. Yeah, where they're still manufacturing socks is here,

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 2>So I shall go and get myself some new socks.

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 2>And that was just as the funniest guy, and so

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 2>off we went to the sub factory. And I think

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 2>that that it sort of sums up Colby as well.

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 2>I think just a unique person and a unique talent

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 2>and it was lovely to put in that town and

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 2>to have such support from the town as well. It

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 2>was everyone was super excited to have us there and

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 2>so welcoming.

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I love the idea of them all peering out of

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>their windows to get a look at Sam Neil and

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>there's so much more person. I interviewed him once after

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the logis and I was such a random thing. You

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>could put your name down to interview certain people you

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think you're going to get to do it, sort

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of a red carpet scenario. But then afterwards in the

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>media room, and I just remember thinking that this person was,

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>for one thing, could be a comedian, like he is

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>so funny, like I was like, and I'd ever known

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>him at that point was just being this very serious actor.

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>But there's just so much more to his warmth and

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>his integrity. Is just a joy to be around. And

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a surprise, you know it is.

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 2>And he's wonderful intelligent with his notes too. Just for

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 2>the record, I love it.

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, hopefully he listens to this podcast. Sarah. I am

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in your audience, and I am going to be in

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>your audience forever. I will be there cheering you on

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>when you get your Academy award. I feel like it's

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the it's in the water, it's got to happen.

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 2>So I love you, thank you, and thank you for

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 2>having me back. I really appreciate it. It's lovely talking

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 2>to you.

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Ben No, thank you for your generosity with your time.

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I will let you go look after yourself and I'll

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>say how amazing you were to d so thank you

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>for that.

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate that. Thanks So, I really appreciate your support

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 2>and enthusiasm.

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, watching