WEBVTT - MINI: Next Saturday

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Quest.

0:00:00.920 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, welcome friends to the Christian o'connells Show podcast. But you,

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Siria has a question that he's actually framed us. He

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 2>believes he's in the right.

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I want you, guys, to settle an argument, and

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 3>by that I mean I want you to agree with me.

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>But I'll give you I'll give you the facts.

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Yep. This feels like every conversation with my wife. I'm

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 2>interested in your opinion as long as this agrees with me.

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:23.440
<v Speaker 4>There's only one right end.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Yes, exactly exactly, So last Sunday, not the Sunday just passed.

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 3>Sunday before that, my mate Jacob sends a text to

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 3>the group chat guys, it's my birthday coming up, So

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 3>next Saturday, let's go for beers. Great, no worries. Pop

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 3>it in my calendar. This Saturday rolls around as in

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 3>like two days ago. I'm sitting at home, I'm watching

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 3>the games. Phone starts blowing up. Oh with Rio, no

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 3>show Jacob's birthday. I go back to the text. He

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 3>said next Saturday. To me, that means not this Saturday

0:00:57.720 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 3>coming up, the next Saturday.

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 4>No, you're wrong, I agree. I always use next Saturday

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 4>as one Saturday in.

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Between you're adding more words, So it's not next Saturday.

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, otherwise that's this that's Saturday, that's just Saturday.

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 3>That's just the normal Saturday.

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 2>It's crystal clearly, I think you're strangely wrong. If it's

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 2>the next Saturday, it's the next one, Cory, very next one. No,

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 2>the english here is specific. It's the next Saturday, two

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 2>weeks time. The language the two words together. There for

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 2>a reason, next Saturday.

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 4>Saturday is short for not this Saturday.

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 3>Next.

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 4>Say everybody knows what this Sunday, next Saturday.

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Because if you want two weeks.

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 4>Time, that's Saturday week. If you wanted to use English

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 4>for this Saturday, just say this Saturday.

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Are either's acceptable because it's the next available Saturday. This one,

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 2>because you again you're adding ext words in there. You

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 2>you're next few words next Saturday.

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>No, it's just Saturday.

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 2>If I said, right, the next break, when is that

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 2>two breaks time?

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 4>Hell, this only applies for a.

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Special rule that semantics always have to be applied. So

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 2>when's the next break in your ration? Now it's in

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 2>two breaks time?

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.519
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't work.

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 2>So the next hour? When is that two hours time?

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Next hour is not this hour? Because we're in this

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 3>hour next hour.

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:33.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, it sounds like you it's in two hours time.

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 2>That's just this our Okay, what's the next month?

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Next month is not this month, it's the month after.

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 2>So what is that September time?

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's not get into it.

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 4>Doesn't work for anything other than days of the week.

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 4>But I agree with Rio, thank, no way, Perhaps.

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 2>What do we split here? No? I agree totally with

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Christian absolutely.

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Next is.

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 2>We're going to skip the next one and go the

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:01.119
<v Speaker 2>next next.

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 4>Week because there's a full proof word for the coming Saturday,

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 4>and that's this Saturday Sday.

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 2>So who else was there?

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>Okay, everyone else?

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:14.119
<v Speaker 2>You were the only one, so everyone else understood next Saturday.

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Yes, But I think they just put two and two

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 3>together because it was birthday next Saturday.

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 4>If you have an idiot friend whose birthday is maybe

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.359
<v Speaker 4>they decided like, oh, it's a probably idiot friend. He's

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 4>going to not know next Saturday, real next Saturday.

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Yes, Otherwise just say Saturday, Yeah, which Saturday?

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Saturday?

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 2>If it's just the next Saturday. If you say, you've

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 2>got some leaky logic, if.

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 4>You say I'm having drinks on Saturday, there's no confusion

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 4>that that's coming Saturday.

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll be their Saturday.

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 2>No worry. What about the next available Saturday? When would

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 2>that be next Saturday?

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Next available Saturday? Yes, that's this Saturday.

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Ye, yeah, there you go. So he went next to

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 2>take away available and you've just got next Saturday.

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 4>But you've taken away a very important word.

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we put but remaining two really important ones the

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 2>next Saturday. Let's go to producer Kaitlin. What do you

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 2>think next Saturday? When would we be meeting?

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you and Pats the following Saturday.

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you'd be Saturday. No, you don't even know me.

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Can we take your for a year? Agree with those.

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 2>Two you just said two weeks time. This is the

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Christian O'Connell show podcast. Lots of people are all weighing

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 2>in on this. Still now on the text, christ and

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 2>I hope you don't have a road trip coming up

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 2>with Jack anytime soon. If you ask Jack to take

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 2>the next excip he's ignoring the next one, taking you

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 2>to the next one after that.

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:37.600
<v Speaker 4>It depends how you say it, because if I say,

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 4>am I getting off here?

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 2>You go know that the next if it's all road

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.599
<v Speaker 2>road road road road, Christian I'm one hundred percent with

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 2>Rio and Jack. This Saturday is the next Saturday, and

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 2>next Saturday is the Saturday after this Saturday. Clear as

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 2>mud Danny, none of that makes any sense. Christian think

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 2>we're all missing a big point here. Rio should just

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 2>go up both Saturdays. The avoidance of doubt. Christian, I

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 2>would clarify about the date. There's no need to. If

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 2>it's a Sunday and it's next Saturday, is this Saturday?

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Next Saturday means this Saturday. Stop saying keep texting it

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 2>to me. It's like a mantra. Say it ten times,

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 2>see what happens. The word this and next refers to

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:22.239
<v Speaker 2>the week. So this Saturday is the Saturday of this week. Agreed.

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 2>Next Saturday is a Saturday belonging to next week.

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.559
<v Speaker 4>That's a good Yes, this is a great from Lauren.

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 2>If on a Sunday you say next Saturday, you're referring

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 2>to Saturday next week, which also happens in the circumstances

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 2>to be the upcoming Saturday. Because Christian right, the week

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 2>begins Monday.

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Yes, that's why it makes Sunday so confusing.

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, or not? I were to say or not?

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 2>The Christian Connell Show podcast,