WEBVTT - The plan to protect LGBT+ discrimination in religious schools

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Already and this this is the daily os.

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 2>This is the daily ohs oh, now it makes sense.

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Good morning, and welcome to the Daily Odds. It is Monday,

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 2>the twenty fifth of March.

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm billy, i'm zara.

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 2>An independent legal body has advised the federal government on

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 2>how to legally protect LGBT plus staff and students are

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 2>religious schools. The government asked the Australian Law Reform Commission

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 2>to review federal anti discrimination laws in light of a

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 2>year's long debate about religious freedoms. We'll tell you everything

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 2>you need to know in today's deep dive, But for Sarah,

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 2>what's making headlines.

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Islamic State has taken responsibility for an attack in Moscow

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 3>that killed more than one hundred and thirty people and

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 3>injured one hundred and forty others. Eleven people have been

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 3>detained over the attack at a concert hall, which is

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 3>the deadliest attack inside Russia in twenty years. US intelligence

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 3>has revealed they reportedly warned of a possible attack. The

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Russian authorities claimed the intelligence lacked specific detail.

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 2>US President Joe Biden has canceled the student debts of

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 2>nearly seventy eight thousand public service workers including teachers and

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 2>frontline workers. Biden will wife nearly six billion US dollars,

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 2>which is nearly nine billion Australian dollars in debt. It

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 2>follows several stages of a government policy canceling student debt.

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 2>Republicans have criticized Biden for the plan, claiming it will

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 2>leave US taxpayers worse off.

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 3>Tasmanian Labor leader Rebecca White has declared her party will

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 3>not be able to claim victory in the state's election,

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 3>which means the Liberal Party will need to form government

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 3>by working with crossbenches and minor parties. According to the

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 3>ABC at the time of recording, the Liberals will finish

0:01:55.840 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 3>with between fourteen and sixteen seats, so that is short

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 3>of the eighteen that's needed to govern in a majority.

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 3>Current Premier Jeremy Rockcliffe said yesterday, I look forward to

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 3>discussions over the course of the coming week. I've already

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 3>reached out to potential independence and indeed the Lambee Party

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 2>And today's good news In a world first, surgeons in

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 2>the US have successfully transplanted a pig kidney into a

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 2>living person. Scientists use gene editing technology to remove harmful

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 2>pig genes and they also added certain human genes to

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 2>improve the organ's compatibility with a human and boost the

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 2>chance of the transplants success.

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so Billy, religious discrimination is back in the news

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:46.399
<v Speaker 3>and it's.

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Quite a complex topic.

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Can you just take us back to where the conversation

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 3>around this legislation first began.

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's really really complicated, and so first I just

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 2>want to set out the two main issues that we

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 2>are addressing that will shape this entire conversation. So the

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 2>first is the fact that there is not an explicit

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 2>federal law banning religious discrimination in Australia.

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 3>There are laws that target sex discrimination, racial discrimination, but

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 3>not one specifically about religious discrimination exactly.

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 2>So that's the first issue. The second is around the

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:28.399
<v Speaker 2>idea of religious exemptions. So should discrimination be allowed if

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.119
<v Speaker 2>it is due to religious reasons?

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Can you give me an example?

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Ye?

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Yees? So an example is like, should religious schools be

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 2>able to not employ a teacher on the basis of

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 2>their sexuality?

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 3>So if it's a religious school that doesn't believe in

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 3>same sex marriage, for example, exactly, then they can choose

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 3>not to hire a teacher or discriminate against a teacher

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 3>on that basis.

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.119
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And that's a really big part of this conversation

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 2>is should that legally be allowed?

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay?

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 2>And you can't really talk about one of those issues

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 2>without talking about the.

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Other because it's a byproduct exactly.

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 2>But to go back to your question of where this

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 2>all started, we need to go back to twenty seventeen

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 2>when same sex marriage was legalized in Australia. Now, long story, short.

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 2>After same sex marriage was legalized, a review was promised

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 2>to conservative religious groups who weren't happy about this legislation passing.

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.479
<v Speaker 2>And the review promised to look into whether Australian law

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 2>adequately protects the right to freedom of religion in Australia.

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 2>Now, honestly, I think if we go into exactly what

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 2>that review said and what it recommended, we would be

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 2>here all day. And I want to get into the

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 2>more recent developments of this story, but I will just

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 2>focus on how the coalition government responded to that review.

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So we're talking about the coalition. I believe at

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 3>that point it was led by Scott Morrison.

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that right?

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Scott Morrison had just got in.

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, So how did the Morrison government rect spun

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:00.799
<v Speaker 3>to the review?

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 2>At the time, so he promised a Religious Discrimination Act, okay,

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 2>and so he tried to pass this legislation actually a

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 2>number of times, and it basically would have made it

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 2>unlawful to discriminate against someone on the basis of their

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 2>religious belief.

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 3>So that was focusing on the first point you spoke about,

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 3>that there was no federal law that specifically was about

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 3>discrimination on the basis of religion.

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but where the controversy arose was on how it

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 2>impacted that second point. Yeah, So it was really controversial

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 2>at the time basically because critics said that whilst the

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 2>bill indeed would have protected religious people from discrimination, it

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 2>also would have consequently led to more discrimination against LGBT

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 2>plus people.

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 2>So just to give you an idea, one MP who

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 2>was actually from the same party as Morrison said that

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 2>this legislation that he was trying to introduce would have

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 2>left a transgender child open to lead being bullied, excluded,

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 2>or even expelled because of their gender identity. Now, as

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 2>you can imagine, the politics around the time were, like

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 2>I said, really controversial, and ultimately it failed to pass

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 2>despite multiple attempts.

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 3>I remember that time so clearly. I think it was

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 3>the only time in my memory that a number of

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Liberal MPs crossed the floor, so they physically moved across

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 3>the floor to sit with the opposition, to vote against

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 3>their own party because they said it was a bunch

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 3>of moderate MPs, most of whom lost their seats. Actually,

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 3>they said that they couldn't in good conscience vote for

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 3>this bill. And it was extraordinary. It was so contentious,

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 3>it was all over the news. But then they kind

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 3>of just went away.

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 2>Well it failed right before the twenty twenty two election

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 2>when Morrison was ousted as the Prime Minister, and so

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 2>that left it to the Labor government to pick up

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 2>this mess and lead the path forward on this really

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 2>complicated debate.

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So Anthony Albernezi then had to deal with this

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 3>piece of legislation that had failed before, but there was

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 3>obviously an appetite from some for it to pass.

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>What was Labour's position on the bill?

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 2>So Labour said that they supported protecting religious people from discrimination,

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 2>but not if it came at the expense of other

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 2>people's right not to be discriminated against. Now, when they

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 2>got into government, they looked for advice. They said, we're

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 2>not exactly the experts on this, we need advice on

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 2>what to do now, and so they turned to the

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Australian Law Reform Commission to recommend a path forward. And

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 2>if you don't know the Australian Law Reform Commission, they

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 2>are an independent agency designed to do exactly that, to

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 2>advise the government on law reform.

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.679
<v Speaker 3>And so, I mean, I feel like we've gone down

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 3>memory lane a bit, We've gone back to twenty seventeen.

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 3>But my understanding is that that brings us up to

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 3>the present to now. So last week the Commission finally

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 3>delivered its recommendations to the government.

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>What were the recommendations? What did they say?

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was hundreds of pages long. So obviously I'm

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 2>not going to go through all of the recommendations, but

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 2>a really significant one is the recommendation for the government

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 2>to remove something called Section thirty eight in the Sex Discrimination.

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 3>Act, which is obviously not a religious discrimination Act. So

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about existing legislation that's already about discrimination and

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 3>there's an exemption there.

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's an exemption, and it's really important to understand this.

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 2>So currently in the Sex Discrimination Act, there is an

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 2>exemption which allows religious schools to discriminate against someone based

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 2>on their sex, their sexual orientation, gender identity, or their

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 2>marital or relationship status.

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>And what would that mean Scrapping it?

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 2>So, scrapping it entirely would mean that religious schools cannot

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 2>dismiss staff or expel students based on, you know, if

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 2>they're gay, or if they're transgender, or other similar facts.

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 2>And so this report said that getting rid of that

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 2>exemption would substantially narrow instances where religious schools can discriminate

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 2>against people.

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so there we're talking about.

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Sorry to keep going back to the first two groups

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 3>you set out, but that's the second group. But what

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 3>about the first group? We spoke about the fact that

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 3>there was a discussion around protecting the right of religion too.

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 2>And so in that regard, it recommended keeping the right

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 2>of religious schools to preference hiring someone of the same

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 2>religion over a candidate who does not follow the school's faith. Okay,

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 2>So that would allow religious schools to require adherence to

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 2>their faith as part of their vetting process for jobs,

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 2>as part of a school's broader effort to build a

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 2>community of faith. So basically they just recommended keeping that

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 2>and really protecting that, and how they recommended protecting that

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 2>is by introducing an exemption in the Fair Work Act,

0:09:57.120 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 2>which sets out workplace laws in Australia.

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so that was all advice that was given to

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 3>the government in the form of a report of many pages.

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 3>How did the government respond to this advice.

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:12.599
<v Speaker 2>Basically, they've just said that they are considering these recommendations

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 2>and that they'll look at it before they give a

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 2>more concrete way forward. But what was a really interesting

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 2>development in the government's response to this was that Prime

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Minister Anthony Albanesi said that he will not pass a

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 2>law on religious discrimination unless the Opposition supports it, and

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.959
<v Speaker 2>so that is a big development. And what he's saying

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 2>is that this has been such a divisive debate in

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Australia over the last literally seven years, i mean since

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 2>same sex marriage was legalized, and he's saying, we do

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 2>not want this to be divisive anymore. We are going

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 2>to do this with the opposition and move forward.

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 3>But I mean that's fascinating because the opposition or the

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 3>Coalition themselves couldn't agree as a party, they had their

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 3>own members crossing the floor. Labor would be the same

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 3>in terms of you know, lots of different views and

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 3>emotions and all the rest. I can hardly see bipartisanship

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 3>happening in this sort of context.

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Clearly Albanezi possibly thinks that that could happen.

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Have we had any indication from the opposition.

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, TDA journalist Harry Sekulich spoke to the opposition.

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 2>He spoke to the Shadow Attorney General, Mikaylia Cash, who

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 2>told him that the coalition notes that representatives of Christian schools,

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 2>the Catholic Church, Islamic schools and a number of other

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 2>faith groups have expressed serious concerns with this report and

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 2>its recommendations. And she also added that she encourages the

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Albanese government to address these concerns. Now, when Harry pressed

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 2>her on what exactly those concerns were, she did not clarify.

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay, interesting, still a bit to work through there. What

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 3>about the community more broadly, this is legislation that would

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 3>affect many, many people.

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 1>What have we heard from the community.

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so, Michaleya Cash, she just mentioned Christian schools one

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 2>example of a group of schools that weren't happy, and

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 2>she's right. Christian Schools Australia said the recommendations amount to

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 2>quote a direct attack on faith and freedom of belief

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 2>in Australia. And they also said that Christian education would

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 2>cease to exist under the proposed changes. But then on

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 2>the other hand, there's Equality Australia, which is the peak

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 2>LGBT plus body in Australia, and they welcomed the report

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 2>and they urged the government to make the recommendations law.

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 2>The CEO of Equality Australia, Anna Brown said, quote, every

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 2>day we delay these reforms, there will be more students

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:36.959
<v Speaker 2>who are robbed of their chance to become a school

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 2>prefect or take their partner to the formal and there

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 2>will be more teachers who are fired or told they

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 2>no longer fit for any promotions. So there she's addressing

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 2>the recommendation to completely get rid of that exemption I

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:50.719
<v Speaker 2>talked about of Section thirty eight.

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 3>It'll be really interesting to see what happens from here.

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it tore the last government apart and it

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 3>seems like there are still many unresolved issues that need attention,

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of work cut out for the government and

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 3>especially if they're seeking bipartisan support there.

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for.

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Joining us on the Daily OZ. If you enjoyed today's episode.

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 3>You can follow us on Spotify or Apple. Send the

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 3>signal to the platforms that you love what we do

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 3>and it means that you'll have an episode waiting for

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 3>you every weekday morning.

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Or if you're listening on YouTube, you can subscribe and

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 2>you can see that Zara and I are actually wearing

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 2>the same shirts.

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>We have morphed into the same past three years in

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the making. Thanks for joining us. My name is Lily

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Maddon and I'm a proud Arunda Bungelung Caalcuton woman from

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Gadighol Country.

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 2>The Daily oz acknowledges that this podcast is recorded on

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 2>the lands of the Gadighl people and pays respect to

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 2>all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island and nations. We pay

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 2>our respects to the first peoples of these countries, both

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 2>past and present,