WEBVTT - The Investigation That Never Was

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Just before nine o'clock last night, the jury returned guilty

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>verdicts against all three defendants.

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 2>It was absolute shambles to tell you the truth just

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 2>actually really come of blood on Who's closing the day

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 2>after the alleged at an Ashelle mud bank and it

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 2>fits through a river.

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 3>Basically, I think most of the people are used to me,

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 3>there are good people.

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 4>I think a really important question we need to ask

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 4>is how many Indigenous prisoners in Australia are innocent.

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 2>This is Curtain, a podcast where we pull back the

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 2>blinds to shine a light on the darkest parts of

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 2>our justice system and ask who are the victims.

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:40.959
<v Speaker 4>I'm Amy Maguire and I'm Martin Hodgson, a senior advocate

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 4>for the Foreign Prisoner Support Service. And a warning. This

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 4>series contains the names of deceased peoples and has distressing

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 4>content that might upset some listeners.

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 5>My name is Ramus Santana. My name is Kevin Richardson.

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 6>My name is Yuseph Salam. I'm one of the Central

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 6>Park five. In eighteen eighty nine, we were falsely arrested

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 6>and convicted for crimes that we didn't commit.

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 5>We were kids at the time.

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 6>We spent presciushrees of our life in prison.

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 5>We were taken from our homes and we were put

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 5>in prison for the next seven to thirteen years.

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 6>In our case, there were false confessions. The public never

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 6>got a chance to see how these false confessions started.

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 6>They only saw the ending.

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 5>With the problem my rights and interrogated behind closed doors.

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 5>This is stuff that we want people to see. What

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 5>actually takes place inside that room when they feed you

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 5>details the pride of food and he doesn't have any sleep,

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 5>the pride of water. They go through dramatic stress, being

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:36.479
<v Speaker 5>the prov of your necessity. When a person sits there

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 5>for over twenty hours, I just wanted to go home. Basically,

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 5>all you get at the end is just that nice

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 5>package of a person saying that they committed a crime.

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 3>What was he doing with him?

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 5>We want you to see the whole process, from me

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 5>begeinning to the end, from beginning to the end.

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 3>That was three members of the famous Central Park five.

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Like Kevin, they were convicted of murder twenty five years ago,

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 3>and just like Kevin, the only evidence presented in court

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 3>against them were false confessions. All were coerced using the

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 3>same sort of police techniques that were very common at

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 3>the time but still persist to this day. Just like Kevin,

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 3>there was no forensic evidence or DNA linking them to

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 3>the crime, and yet despite this, they lost years of

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 3>their life in prison at the time of their sentence.

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:40.679
<v Speaker 3>Now President Donald Trump called for their execution, But the

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 3>Central Park Five are now free and they've proven their

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 3>innocence and they've shown that the way their confessions were

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 3>taken and forced out of them was very common at

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 3>the time. That's why now they want videos of confessions

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 3>like theirs, taken from start to finish, not stopped and started,

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 3>as was also the case with Kevin Henry. The Central

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Park Five are now successfully suing many of the people

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 3>who were involved in their conviction for a crime they

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 3>did not commit. Just like Kevin, they didn't have proper

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 3>legal representation. They were also in no state to give

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 3>any evidence to police. They should have had lawyers by

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 3>their side. They should have had time to speak with

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 3>these lawyers and understand what was being put to them

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 3>and what the police was saying, but no one took

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 3>that time, and sadly, just like Kevin Henry, they found

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 3>themselves in prison for a crime they knew they didn't

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 3>commit and just like Kevin Henry, they always maintained their innocence.

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 3>For the past year, we've been outlining the case of

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Henry or Curtin, and over this year we've raised

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 3>serious doubt about his gill. We're glad you've come on

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 3>this journey with us and it become involved in investigating

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 3>the case. Over the past few months, we've received a

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 3>lot of feedback from those of you who are trying

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 3>to figure out this case as well.

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 2>We have tried to answer a lot of those questions

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.119
<v Speaker 2>that there is always one enduring one. If Kevin didn't

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 2>do it, who did. In this episode, we're going to

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 2>be backtracking a little bit and we'll give you some

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:42.239
<v Speaker 2>information that you haven't received yet. It revolves around another witness,

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 2>because Kevin wasn't the first person police tried to pin

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 2>this crime on. But first I want to stop asking Martin.

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 2>You've received a lot of feedback, particularly from people in

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 2>the legal fraternity. So what's been the common perception of

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:57.359
<v Speaker 2>this case.

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people, particularly lawyers, in breaking

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>down the case, quickly look at the legal technicalities of

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the case, the flaws and the lack of evidence, But

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>also I think the common curiosity is if Kevin didn't

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>do it, then who did?

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 2>And I think we've seen, particularly overseas, that when these

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 2>sort of investigations are made public, people tend to go

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 2>down their own lines of inquiry. Do you think do

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 2>you think there are certain people that the public are

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 2>sort of thinking are more likely to have done this crime.

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I think, based on the information that's available to the public,

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>perhaps some people might think that the women who committed

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the initial assault might be responsible for Linda's dance. But

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>from what we know, including all the facts that are

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 1>available at the time and now, that's probably not the case,

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>particularly not the case that they were the ones who

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>placed Linder's body in the river.

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 2>So it's I mean, we've said throughout this investigation that

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 2>they were definitely the ones who committed the assault. We're

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 2>not denying that that was an actual fact, and it

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 2>came out in court, but it's just what happened to

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 2>her body afterwards, and what Kevin got the harsher sentence for.

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 2>That's what we're sort of saying that we have. No,

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 2>we're not there's no indication that they were involved in

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 2>any way.

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right. I think from the initial investigation, what

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>came out at trial, and what we've learned now our

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>own investigation that there's no doubt that they were not

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>involved in the placing of the body in the river.

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 2>So we never said the three women who were convicted

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 2>of Griev's bodily harm were the ones who placed Linder

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 2>in the river. We obviously can't rule it out, but

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 2>it does seem very unlikely.

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>But in this episode we're going to go through the

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 1>other people. Police should have followed up and they didn't.

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 2>I also have to note that many of the people

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 2>were discussing are now deceased. That's the other tragic part

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 2>of this story. Too many Aboriginal people who have died

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 2>before their time. All of the people we've mentioned in

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 2>this story have histories of trauma, just like Linda, and

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 2>just like Kevin Henry so Martin. There was no forensics

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 2>at the scene, nothing really tying Kevin to the crime

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 2>at all. I just wonder why did the police start

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 2>pointing towards Kevin. When did they start to do this

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 2>and why?

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, at some point mister Henry believed or said he'd

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>called an ambulance at some point in the evening, However,

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a check at the records showed that no ambulance was

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>dispatched to Tanuba House, and that's most likely a call

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>had never been made at all. Whether Kevin remembers this inaccurately,

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>explained it this way due to the weight of pressure

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>being exerted upon him in the interrogation, or made it up,

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it really doesn't matter. No ambulance came and no ambulance

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>was called, But it's what happens next that's most concerning.

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 2>So I guess I what happened after that? I mean,

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 2>it seems to me, I mean, it isn't inaccurate information,

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 2>but everyone was drunk at that time. There could have

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.079
<v Speaker 2>been quite an indis innocent explanation for it. So what

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 2>happened after that? And and did police fail to follow

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:38.439
<v Speaker 2>any other avenues or so?

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>What happened is that one police ascertained that most likely

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>no ambulance was called. They zeroed in on Kevin Henry

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. And here's what happened at trial. This is

0:08:55.640 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>David Murray, Kevin's barrister. My client told you in a

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>record of interview that we will no doubt here tomorrow

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:10.199
<v Speaker 1>that he rang the ambulance. Whereas you inquired and found

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:14.319
<v Speaker 1>out that he never did. This paints the picture? Does it?

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>This means Henry is right for it? Does it? Responding

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:23.559
<v Speaker 1>in court his officer hunt, No, it does not.

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Did if this was the only thing that sort of

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 2>began the investigation and pointed more towards Kevin, did Kevin's

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 2>representation at trial actually challenged that in any way when

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 2>it went to court.

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I think that the point mister Murray was

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>making was that if all they had at this point

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.719
<v Speaker 1>was the fact that a call probably wasn't made to

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>an ambulance, was this all they really had to investigate

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Henry? And why did they assume from this point

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that he was involved, particularly when there was potentially other suspects.

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And he'd go on to thrash out with the officers

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>whether they'd investigated any of those other suspects.

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Before we go into that sort of testament, can I

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 2>ask you who were were there a number of police

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 2>officers who gave evidence at the trial it was only

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 2>or how many actually gave evidence and who were they?

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>So we have two officers who ran the investigation, while

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.599
<v Speaker 1>a number of officers gave evidence a trial only to

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>speak to the actual investigation. The leading investigators were Senior

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Constable Robert Hunt and Plane closed Senior Constable leslie Girk.

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>They ran the investigation from start to finish, and they

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>were the two officers who gave testimony on the stand

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 1>about the investigation itself.

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 2>Did they ever give an actual explanation as to why

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 2>Kevin was the one primarily cornered for this or that

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 2>was the only thing? The ambulance and they didn't. That

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 2>was all they said in relation to it.

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.679
<v Speaker 1>The ambulance was the main reason that they seemed to

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.719
<v Speaker 1>target in on Kevin early on. What we don't know

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>is what was said by other people off the record,

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>what the police believed of their own volition and never

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:36.599
<v Speaker 1>admitted to on the stand. But what we do know

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.079
<v Speaker 1>is that very early on, and I mean very early on,

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the police targeted Kevin and virtually no one else.

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Now they didn't target anyone else. Was that fact brought

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 2>force in trial, particularly by Kevin's representation. Did they bring

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 2>up any other names?

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so a number of other names were raised, particularly

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 1>mister Murray Kevin's defense barrister. Again, this is mister Murray

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Henry's barrister at trial, across examining officer Robert Hunt.

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:15.559
<v Speaker 1>You tell us now, detective, why you didn't investigate duk

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Heart and question why he lied to you? Answer? Duckhart

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>had already been questioned in regard to the matter. In

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>regards to the statement, question, did you go back and

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:34.719
<v Speaker 1>question why he lied to you? Answer? No, I did not.

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Why not because it had been clarified in other statements

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that he was not present there? Question can you tell

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>us which statements it's clarified that he wasn't present? Answer?

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>I cannot recall. I'd have to recall back to them.

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Question perhaps we will still be going tomorrow, you can

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>do it tonight. Answer all right. Then mister Murray raised

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>another potential suspect, the question do you know Willy West? Answer? No,

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 1>I do not. Question, well, Willy West is mentioned in

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the material. Didn't you want to equate yourself

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>with a name that was mentioned in the material that

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>there was no statement? Front Hunt answers does he go

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>by any other name? Murray continues, I'm asking you. You're

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:44.199
<v Speaker 1>the detective, I'm the barrister and answers, no, I'm not

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>familiar with that name Willy West. Now, at this point,

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>mister Murray also raises some other names. They may not

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>be suspects, but they are names we do know that

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>would have been known to the investigating officers. Mister Murray

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>asks what about Clinton Hill? The answer, I'm not familiar

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>with that name either. What about Brian Tawley, I'm not

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>familiar with that name? What about a white fellow also

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a confident of Tully's, named Roy, who is recently deceased.

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you know him at all? I'm not sure who

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you are referring to know.

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 2>So did the police make any effort to find out

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 2>who these people were? And why didn't they know? And

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 2>also what were their explanations for not following up for.

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:47.119
<v Speaker 1>The any Well, they didn't really seem to have an explanation.

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>They should have known because these names were raised in

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>statements by the people present at Tanuba House that night,

0:14:56.160 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>so the information was known to police. The information was

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>in the statements. I think one of the reasons they

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>say they're not familiar with the names is they simply

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>never followed it up. And this goes to a point

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>that as soon as they looked at Kevin for the crime,

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>they zeroed in on Kevin, and Kevin alone and that's

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>problematic in any investigation by not keeping an open mind,

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>by not being open to the possibility that anyone else

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and we know that at least thirty people were there

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that night, plus others who could have come and gone

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>were potentially responsible, means that anyone who actually did the

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>crime was missed from the start.

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Now, these there weren't only people who were known that

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 2>to Nuba were there. We've already discussed several times on

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 2>this program about the other camp which seemed to be

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 2>predominantly white fellows who'd come down to Tanuba House. Did

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 2>that come up in trial? And did the police show

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 2>any indication that they knew about this other camp of people.

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that information certainly did come up, but it doesn't

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>appear like any investigation was done into who these people

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>were and what happened. Again, I'll go back to the transcript.

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>It's mister Murray Cross examining Senior Constable Robert Hunt. Did

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you gain information that some white fellows and perhaps some

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Aboriginal fellows in company with them, used to frequent Tanuba

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>House for purposes of violence and attempting intercourse with the

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Aboriginal women. The answer, yes, we had. Did you investigate

0:16:54.560 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to find those men. Yes, I think we did. Murray,

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you think we did? I have to ask you again,

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you are the detective. The answer, yes, we did. Where

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>did you look? We tried to ascertain the names and

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>identities of these people through the statements that were provided

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to us. As such, no further information could be given

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to us. As such, we could not continue with the investigation.

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>We had nothing to go by. Has it puzzled you

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that during this trial this court has founded these names out? Answer? No,

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>it does not. Again, mister Murray, very well, during the

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>course of your investigation, did you find out the names

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of any persons who at any time had frequented ten

0:17:53.400 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Uber House, stirring up or causing trouble with the occupants there? Hunt, No,

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I did not. Can you tell us the extent of

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>your inquiries in that respect? Is that to your initial

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.360
<v Speaker 1>inquiry to which you made or to your question? Now,

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Hunt replies, I'm talking about the same subject. We did

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>not make any further inquiries in relation to that. Murray, then, presses,

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 1>can you tell us the inquiries you did make? As

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I said before, it had come out in a number

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of the statements.

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 2>So what do we take from that? It seems that

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Hunt has just admitted that they weren't actually actively investigating,

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 2>actually going out and finding out more about suspects. They

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 2>were just looking through the statements they had already taken.

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's particularly troubling. I think when anyone

0:18:56.000 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>thinks about police work, particularly something as serious as a murder,

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that police would be boots on the ground looking for information,

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>speaking to people, knocking on doors and trying to find

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>out who these other people were. Now they say that

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:21.199
<v Speaker 1>the names came up in the statements and plenty given't

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and that they just couldn't ascertain who these people were.

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>But we know from these statements that they were told

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>exactly who a number of these people were and it

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>was just never followed up on. Understand Hunt was also

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>asked about other people, Loretta Brown and could not recall

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>if he interviewed her, nor a Bernie Ross. But he

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 1>had taken these statements.

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 2>The timeframe of them pointing at Kevin. Did he mention

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the ambulance in his original statement, and that's where they

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 2>got it from. So they've only got one inconsistency from

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 2>one early star, is that how it worked in relation.

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>To the time for it comes from the first statement

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that Kevin gave, and we have to remember that he

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>was clearly intoxicated at this time. We've heard from his cousin,

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>Doug Graham, who saw a video of Kevin at this

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>point and could tell he was intoxicated. Kevin made the

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>claim about the ambulance, and whether he did that because

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>he was just trying to please the officers and get

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>out of the interview under massive stress, we don't know.

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>But that was the point where they've decided Kevin was

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>right for it. As mister Murray put to Senior Constable.

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Hunt, so before they picked him up that day and

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 2>interviewed him, so over that course of that to our interview,

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 2>they hadn't singled him out particularly. It was only because

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 2>of that interview and him talking about the ambulance that

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 2>they began to zone in on him. Or were there

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 2>other people beforehand, or how did that work out? It

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 2>was just when they picked him up and began talking

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 2>to him at this point.

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>In no way at all was Kevin Henry considered a

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>suspect for the crime. His name hadn't come up because

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't involved at all in the assault on Winder

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.919
<v Speaker 1>and he wasn't considered a key person at the scene.

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't until that interview where the officers decided he

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>was the person they were going to go after.

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 2>So I guess we can take from that given that

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 2>it was only after that interview that they really singled

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 2>in on Kevin, that there might have been other black

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:48.199
<v Speaker 2>falls they were chasing a relation to this crime beforehand.

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so we know that a number of other people

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 1>were accused of the crime, and they include Frank and

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Wayne Saunters. Wayne's Saunders gave testimony on the stand, which

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>was that he and his brother Frank were told by

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the police they'd done it. Now, there is absolutely no

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:17.120
<v Speaker 1>evidence that Frank and Wayne Saunders were at all involved,

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>and we don't believe for a minute that the police

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>thought they were either. They were simply trying to scare them.

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Wayne Saunders gave up to five statements to police, and

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed that previously. He was the one who police

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.879
<v Speaker 1>kept harassing for a statement all the way up to

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the prison that he was in in November, some months

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>after the crime had occurred.

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:47.640
<v Speaker 2>So what did they say, why they had begun harassing

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 2>him or looking into him, or what came out in court.

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>There was absolutely no explanation as to why the police

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>accused him, his brother, or some of the other people

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>who were at an uber house. It appears that were

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>just throwing accusations, either hoping some mud would stick or

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that someone would buckle and give information that it seems

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 1>fairly clear the people being interviewed just didn't have.

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 2>What was my interusments to this or did people or

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 2>people around ten Uba seem to know what was happening,

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 2>because I can imagine it would have been quite a

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 2>fearful time for a lot of people if the police

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 2>are coming in and accusing a whole heap of people

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 2>at the time.

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so we know there was a great deal of

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>fear amongst the people down at tan Uba. They'd obviously

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>witnessed something horrific. We know that some of the people

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>there had been involved in the assault. They didn't have

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 1>any information they could provide to police that was useful,

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and this is where we get to many of the

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>statements that were simply inaccurate, made up, or just trying

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to please the police to get out of the interviews

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>they were giving. But with this information being so unclear,

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 1>the police should have been investigating further. They couldn't simply

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 1>continue to drag Aboriginal people up to the police station,

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>accuse them of murder and hope that information would come

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>from it.

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Tanuba was largely frequented by mostly Aboriginal people, but there

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 2>were white people who were down there occasionally. And we've

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 2>talked a bit about the other camps that were along

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 2>the riverbank. So was it only blackfellows who were targeted?

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 2>And did that ever come up in the trial that

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 2>they could have been they should have maybe been looking

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 2>for someone outside of the Tanuba community.

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that came up again in the cross examination of

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Senior Constable Hunt, and it was known to everyone. And

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it's important to point this out that anyone who knew

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>this area of Rockhampton knew about the multiple camps along

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the river and that it wasn't only Aboriginal people. This

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>is what mister Murray, Kevin Henry's barrister asked Senior Comfortable

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Hunt on the stand. A number of white people have

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>been down there trying to stir up trouble cause some

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>either assault the aboriginals down there, Hunt interrupts. We tried

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to take that further, but we could not find any

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>identity or any names as to who we could go

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>further with the investigation on that matter. The next question,

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>did you ascertain it all if there was another camp

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 1>at all further down the river, down past the Cruising

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Knot Club Answer, I did not realize that. Now. There's

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>two problems with these answers that have been given. A

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Hunt did know the names of some of those people

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>who'd been coming down, because they were in the statements

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that had been given to him, and they were people

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>who were frequently known to police. The other issue is

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that there is no doubt, an abstractous credulity to believe

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 1>that Hunt was not aware of another camp nearby at

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cruising Yacht Club. He was an officer in Rockhampton

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:35.479
<v Speaker 1>who frequently visited this area and these camps were often

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>where people were picked up by police. For him to

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>suggest he didn't know this camp existed at all and

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that was the reason he didn't investigate the white people

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 1>who'd been at that camp and who were known to

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 1>cause trouble at Tonouba when they visited there. It's just

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 1>not believable, and just for.

0:26:56.320 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Our audiences and people had never been to Rockhampton, the

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Cruising your club is literally just right next to Tanuba House,

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:08.439
<v Speaker 2>so not very far away, probably about fifty meters away.

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 2>So if you were going to do but surely you

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.959
<v Speaker 2>would have seen the evidence of another camp somewhere around there,

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't you.

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well that's right. And I mean the next day

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>when these officers were at Tanuba looking at the crime scene,

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>not only was their people still at Tanuba House, the

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>other camp was full of people, whether they were suspects,

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>whether they were witnesses, the fact that they'd continued to

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>harass Aboriginal people prior to that night. Those people were

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>right there, and Hunt or any of his colleagues could

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:53.479
<v Speaker 1>have interviewed them on that day or in the days following,

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>they simply chose not to.

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 2>And we've talked previously about how after Kevin was charged

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 2>that their investigation was completely dropped, and that's something that

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 2>they do admit to. But did they say anything or

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 2>does Hunt admit anything about what happened leading up to

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 2>Kevin being charged and whether they were investigating. Does he

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 2>admit anything in relation to that, because afterwards they pretty

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:24.120
<v Speaker 2>much admit that it was dropped completely, But before then,

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 2>do they admit anything.

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>We have to remember that on the same day that

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Kevin was charged, the fifth of September, the three women

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>who were involved in the assault on Linda were charged

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>with her murder and admits that this was done on

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the fifth, Kevin following the women. However, there's a crucial

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>point we need to know about that day, which is

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that at the time the three women and Kevin were charged,

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the police did not know the cause of death. That

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>means the forensic doctor had not yet provided his report

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>as to how Linda had passed away. And yet we

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 1>have four people charged with murder in two different circumstances,

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and that once Kevin was charged despite no cause of

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>death having yet been established, the investigation essentially stopped.

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 2>So, Madam, we've been talking about how Kevin was zoned

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 2>in on even though there was very little evidence to

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 2>go on. But in relation to the other names that

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 2>have come up in which the police didn't investigate further,

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 2>were there other signs that were sort of more likely

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:49.719
<v Speaker 2>that they had been involved in the crime rather than

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Kevin that came up in trial.

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, there was plenty of other people where there

0:29:56.280 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>was far more information about them, was more inconsistencies in

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>their statement and there was more information as to whether

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 1>they could have been involved at or now I should

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>say at this point the names we're going to mention,

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>we're not suggesting these people are responsible for the crime.

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>What we are suggesting, however, is the police should have

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 1>investigated these people further, even if it was just to

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>rule them out. That they didn't. Despite there being no

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>cause of death when Kevin was charged, these people were

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>not looked into any further and there are clearly reasons

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that you'll hear why they should have been.

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 2>So how did that come out in the trial?

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 4>Now?

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>In episode two, we began talking about a duck Heart,

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of information that you would have

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>heard so far about him at this stage, whether he

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>was involved or not, it was clear to anyone with

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>half an investigative eye that he was someone who should

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>have been followed up on. And this is what mister

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Murray asked Plaine Clothes Senior Constable Leslie Girk on the stand.

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Were you aware that both Lyle Barnes and Wayne Saunders

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>stated that Duckhart was not at the Great Western but

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>was actually down at Tanuba. They didn't actually say he

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't at the Great Western. They said he was down

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>at Tanuba in the afternoon. Kirk's response, I'm aware that

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Lyle said that in his statement, but I don't recall

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Wayne Murray. You see, did it occur to you that

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>perhaps Duckhart was telling you a lie? Answer? No, I

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>had no cause to believe that, even though there was

0:31:55.640 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>someone contradicting him. Answer yes, Lyle Barnes, you considered to

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>be a fairly reliable witness, didn't you.

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So they pretty much accepted Duckhart's statement and what

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 2>he said.

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right, And at this point they'd also accepted

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>all of Lyle Barnes's statement, but when it comes to

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>duck Heart, they don't seem to accept what was being

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>said by other individuals. Again, I'll go back to Murray.

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Did you accept that part of Lile Barnes's statement as

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>being accurate? The answer from Gurk I did did you

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>accept the part of his statement saying that Duckhart was

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 1>at ten Uber House as being accurate? This is Girk's response.

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I asked duck about it when that was brought to

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>my attention or when I read it, and he said no,

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>he was definitely at the Great Western. So that was

0:32:57.840 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>good enough. Answer yes again, mister Murray, mister Hart has

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>been caught in the active intercourse in the lame way

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 1>by his girlfriend. Come to facto, he's whereaboutser in question,

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>when something happens to winda at a place you believed

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to be down at t Nuba House, Duckhart's whereabouts can't

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>be accounted for? That didn't raise your suspicions? Answer No, Well,

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I had no doubt as to where Duck was.

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 2>So basically the police accepted Duck's arabi without even going

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 2>to investigate it further. I mean, I'm just thinking it

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't have been hard to just ask a few questions,

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 2>particularly from the Great Western. Did they even do that?

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>No, And that comes up at the trial in the transcripts. Now,

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you would think that they would go down there and

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>ask if Duck was there, what time he was there,

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>especially if they had two statements saying that Duck was

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 1>not at the Great Western, he was at Tanuba. And

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 1>this is mister Murray asking about that. Could you verify

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 1>it from the Great Western? Answer? Could I question? Yeah?

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Answer by Girk. I guess if you'd ask them you

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 1>could verify it. Did you you're the investigator? Answer no,

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't.

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 2>So that's a pretty big concession from one of the

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 2>police officers investigating that they didn't follow up a really

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:44.839
<v Speaker 2>crucial lead and a potential alibi. They didn't even bother

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 2>to try and confirm anything. They just took Duckhart on

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:48.879
<v Speaker 2>his word.

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think we have a list of names now.

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Surely the police, even if they were believing duck Hart

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and not believing those who said he was ton Uba,

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.839
<v Speaker 1>there was a very easy way to clarify this, which

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>is what mister Murray asked. Why didn't you simply go

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>down to the Great Western and ask them? And Girk

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 1>says that plainly he just didn't do it. Now, this

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 1>would have allowed them to either continue to investigate dark

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Heart if there were issues as to his alibi, or

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 1>cross his name off the list and start to look

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>at other people, but they chose simply not to do it.

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Now, let me talk about dark I mean, I've just

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:38.760
<v Speaker 2>been asking around and he seemed to be they all accounts,

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 2>a lovely old man. I mean, I've heard him referred

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 2>to as an old gentleman. Everyone really thinks warmly of him.

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 2>But I guess why have we included him in this podcast,

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 2>and why do you think his name keeps coming up

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 2>even though he obviously had had a really good reputation

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 2>around the place.

0:35:58.880 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 4>I think there's some.

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Crucial factors, and we're not suggesting in any way that

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Duckhart was involved in the death of Linda, but his

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>is the most clear example of police being given information

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that they simply didn't follow up on. We do know

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that mister Hart had intercourse with Linda that day. We

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 1>also know he was seen by multiple witnesses at Tanuba,

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:30.399
<v Speaker 1>and this means that his alleged alibi at the Great

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Western was not accurate, and yet police made.

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 4>No efforts to confirm that.

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 1>We also know that Duckhart was the person who found

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Winder's clothing the next morning, and he's also the person

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that found the supposed drag marks that led to the water.

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 1>But even these drag marks were contentious. Hunt was asked,

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 1>was there a trap as such or merely grass pushed

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>over his answer, it's hard to say. It wasn't a

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 1>definite track. Now you have to remember there was no

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 1>forensic evidence, no DNA, no eye witnesses. That these tracks,

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:23.839
<v Speaker 1>according to police, was proof positive that this is where

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Kevin dragged winds through this area on the way to

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the river, and we've just heard from Officer Hunt that

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 1>it was hard to say that it wasn't even a

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>definite track. So the reason we raise mister Hart is

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 1>perhaps he was assisting police, but the information he gave

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>was either largely inaccurate or the forensic information he led

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:56.239
<v Speaker 1>police to was not followed up on. And what was

0:37:56.719 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 1>investigated in no way led to Kevin Henry. And there

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:06.879
<v Speaker 1>were plenty other people whose names were raised, and these

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 1>people were not investigated either.

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:11.840
<v Speaker 2>So who were the names and did they come up

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 2>in court? And were they put to the detectives.

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so these names were in statements given by people

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:24.240
<v Speaker 1>who were there at Tanubah that night as to people

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>who were perhaps involved, were perhaps just at Tanuba House

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>or were names of interest? And mister Murray asked the

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>officer Gurk on the stand about a number of these people.

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Mister Murray, did you interview a person called Willy West? Answer?

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Willie West, Yeah, a fellow from Cherberg Cherberg who was

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 1>drinking with duck Hart that afternoon in the Crown Hotel.

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Answer interview him. It's possible someone else did. Question from

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Murray possible. No one did. That's also possible. Did you

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 1>interview a person called Snowy? I didn't. Has he got

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a name? Mister Murray, you're the investigator here. Did you

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:26.799
<v Speaker 1>read a statement taken by Roger Lowe given by Susan Aubrey. Yes?

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 6>I did.

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 1>In that statement it refers to a white fellow named

0:39:31.440 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Snowy that was down at the Crown having an argument

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 1>with Linda about land rights. Answer, yes, did you try

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and find this fellow named Snowy?

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:49.360
<v Speaker 1>You are aware that Susan Aubrey talks about eight whitefellows,

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>about eight white fellows coming down to Tanuba on the

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Friday night. The answer, I don't remember the amount eight,

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 1>but I do remember some mention of white fellows. For

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the purpose of this recording, I'm going to exclude some

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of the offensive language that was used in the following questioning.

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Mister Murray continued. The white fellows were calling them black seas,

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 1>saying they wanted to root a gin in quotation marks

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>because we were easy, that sort of stuff. Do you

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 1>remember that? Girk responded, I remember her saying something about

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>white fellows going down. But those words, Murray, they don't

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:45.280
<v Speaker 1>ring a bell. Answer. I know the statement contains something

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:47.319
<v Speaker 5>If she.

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Murray again the white fellows calling us black seas saying

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:57.760
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to root a gin because we were easy

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and we were blacks. Does that ring a bell at all?

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>It does about them coming, is the answer? Now Here

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 1>was the chance for Gurk and Hunt to investigate these

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>white men from further up the river. Hunt says they

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>got no names. But here we know that Girk was

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 1>clearly given a name, Snowy, but this was not followed

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 1>up on. This is despite the men from this other

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>camp very close as Amy has described to Tanuba House

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>saying appalling things about Aboriginal people and wanting to rape

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Aboriginal women, and these things were said the very night

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 1>before Linda was murdered. That these people were not investigated

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in any way, and Murray would continue to flash this

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:59.520
<v Speaker 1>out in court. This is what he says about some

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 1>of them, those statements that were made by those men.

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:09.839
<v Speaker 1>That's fairly strong material, isn't it? Those words? In what way?

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Questions Gurk said in relation to intruders to Tanuba House.

0:42:15.840 --> 0:42:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Fairly violent strong stuff, isn't it? Girk? I wouldn't say violent,

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:28.879
<v Speaker 1>did you think it bought investigation to try and turn

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 1>these white fellows up. Answer, It's pretty hard to investigate

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:38.800
<v Speaker 1>when you haven't got any names or descriptions. Did you

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:45.839
<v Speaker 1>think it bore investigation? Yes? Did you investigate it? Well,

0:42:46.280 --> 0:42:52.799
<v Speaker 1>we couldn't, Murray, Officer, Every crime that is committed where

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the person is not caught red handed, the police start

0:42:56.120 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 1>with a blank, don't you answer? That's right? Not necessarily

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 1>a blank. There is always whenever a crime is committed,

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 1>there is something there, Murray. Did you go to all

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of the other occupants at t Muba House on Friday

0:43:15.920 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the thirtieth of August and asked them?

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Why not? A lot of them? A few of them

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in their statements, but they weren't able to say

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:35.439
<v Speaker 1>who they were. Which ones did you ask? Answer? Which ones?

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:37.399
<v Speaker 4>Did I ask? Yes?

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 1>No, I didn't say I asked anyone I said in

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:47.880
<v Speaker 1>their statements. Mister Murray continues, Did it occur to you

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps Linda was left lying on the ground at

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Root Valley, that somebody else came there who had been

0:43:56.400 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 1>there a couple of nights before. Never occurred to you, No,

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:06.680
<v Speaker 1>never occurred to you that duck Hart might have come

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:12.160
<v Speaker 1>back from the Great Western Hotel. Definitely not never occurred

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to you that anybody else could have been involved except

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Henry. That's right. Nothing was that after the fifth

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of September you decided that or before? Answer well, when

0:44:28.520 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I interviewed him, when you interviewed him, hadn't you already

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:37.319
<v Speaker 1>charged Susan Aubrey with murder? The three of them were

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 1>charged with murder. They were before Kevin was interviewed. Answer yes,

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 1>earlier that day.

0:44:47.520 --> 0:44:49.600
<v Speaker 2>So what you said there it shows that the police

0:44:49.800 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 2>really didn't fill out very crucial leads. But the bits

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:56.480
<v Speaker 2>about not falling up, particularly from the white camp, and

0:44:56.560 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 2>them not bothering to go in because they apparently didn't

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:04.320
<v Speaker 2>have any names or descriptions, I mean, it says to

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:08.120
<v Speaker 2>me that Aboriginal women were very accustomed to not feeling

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 2>protected by the people who were supposed to protect them

0:45:11.200 --> 0:45:11.960
<v Speaker 2>on the riverbank.

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's born out, particularly in their statements given

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 1>by the Aboriginal women we know who didn't have anything

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to do with the crime whatsoever. They were either witnesses

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 1>or who'd been made aware of what had gone on,

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and yet it's very clear from their statements that they

0:45:35.640 --> 0:45:40.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't feel like they were assisting police, they felt clearly

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 1>under threat and that they were being pressured to say

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 1>things they either couldn't remember or didn't know. We know

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that multiple numbers of these Aboriginal women retracted their statements

0:45:54.560 --> 0:45:59.520
<v Speaker 1>on the stand under cross examination. We know that a

0:45:59.600 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 1>number were intoxicated when they gave their statements, and although

0:46:04.160 --> 0:46:09.520
<v Speaker 1>police claimed they weren't intoxicated, these women admitted that they

0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:13.640
<v Speaker 1>were when they gave the statements, but no concern was

0:46:13.719 --> 0:46:17.600
<v Speaker 1>given to that. No concern was given to when they

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 1>were picked up to make their statements, anything they had

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:25.279
<v Speaker 1>to say, and nothing they said was ever followed up on.

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:31.120
<v Speaker 1>And if this is the way they treat innocent Aboriginal

0:46:31.200 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 1>women who were simply around at the time, some not

0:46:36.200 --> 0:46:40.719
<v Speaker 1>even there that night, it tends to show how the

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:45.360
<v Speaker 1>police viewed Linda the victim. They simply had no regard

0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 1>for Aboriginal women, because if they did, surely their intention

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:55.640
<v Speaker 1>would have been to do justice for her, which means

0:46:55.760 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 1>one thing, finding the real perpetrator. But they made no

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 1>effort to do that, and in their investigation they clearly

0:47:05.760 --> 0:47:09.479
<v Speaker 1>disregard the statements of all the Aboriginal women.

0:47:10.880 --> 0:47:15.520
<v Speaker 3>That was episode twelve of kurtin the podcast. Today is

0:47:15.600 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 3>Survival Day, or as some wrongly call it, Australia Day.

0:47:20.239 --> 0:47:23.680
<v Speaker 3>For those who celebrate it as Australia Day, that's a

0:47:23.800 --> 0:47:28.160
<v Speaker 3>celebration of invasion and one of the consequences of invasion

0:47:28.719 --> 0:47:34.320
<v Speaker 3>is mass incarceration. Next week, we reveal further truths about

0:47:34.400 --> 0:47:38.920
<v Speaker 3>this case that's wrongly led to the incarceration of Kevin Henry.