1 00:00:01,240 --> 00:00:03,560 Speaker 1: My name is Lily Maddon and I'm a proud Arunda 2 00:00:03,800 --> 00:00:08,600 Speaker 1: Bungelung Calcottin woman from Gadigol Country. The Daily oz acknowledges 3 00:00:08,680 --> 00:00:10,840 Speaker 1: that this podcast is recorded on the lands of the 4 00:00:10,840 --> 00:00:14,400 Speaker 1: Gadighl people and pays respect to all Aboriginal and Torres 5 00:00:14,400 --> 00:00:17,360 Speaker 1: Strait Island and nations. We pay our respects to the 6 00:00:17,360 --> 00:00:20,120 Speaker 1: first peoples of these countries, both past and present. 7 00:00:25,280 --> 00:00:27,880 Speaker 2: Good morning and welcome to the Daily os It's Tuesday, 8 00:00:27,920 --> 00:00:30,280 Speaker 2: the eleventh of July. I'm Sam Kazlowski. 9 00:00:30,320 --> 00:00:31,360 Speaker 3: I'm Zara Sidler. 10 00:00:31,520 --> 00:00:34,360 Speaker 2: You may have noticed there's a new social media app 11 00:00:34,400 --> 00:00:35,599 Speaker 2: causing a frenzy. 12 00:00:35,880 --> 00:00:40,120 Speaker 3: Twitter has some new competition headed to the app store today. 13 00:00:39,880 --> 00:00:44,760 Speaker 2: Facebook and Instagram's parent company Meta launching Dwinds overnight. Threads 14 00:00:44,880 --> 00:00:48,559 Speaker 2: is having a huge first week, attracting over seventy million 15 00:00:48,560 --> 00:00:51,920 Speaker 2: people to the platform, but with Elon Musk threatening to 16 00:00:52,000 --> 00:00:55,240 Speaker 2: sue Meta for stealing Twitter's intellectual property. 17 00:00:55,000 --> 00:00:58,160 Speaker 1: The company accusing Meta of poaching former employees to create 18 00:00:58,200 --> 00:00:59,720 Speaker 1: what it calls a copycat app. 19 00:01:00,480 --> 00:01:02,680 Speaker 2: Is this or going to end with a fight in 20 00:01:02,760 --> 00:01:05,600 Speaker 2: the courts, or will we see Elon Musk and Mark 21 00:01:05,680 --> 00:01:08,840 Speaker 2: Zuckerberg battle it out in a cage match. Will let 22 00:01:08,880 --> 00:01:10,840 Speaker 2: you know in the deep dive, But first, Sarah, what 23 00:01:11,040 --> 00:01:11,920 Speaker 2: is making headlines? 24 00:01:13,160 --> 00:01:16,679 Speaker 3: Independent Senator Lydia Thorpe has told Channel nine she will 25 00:01:16,720 --> 00:01:19,800 Speaker 3: not seek reelection after her six year term ends in 26 00:01:19,880 --> 00:01:23,720 Speaker 3: twenty twenty eight. Thorpe has represented Victoria in the Senate 27 00:01:23,760 --> 00:01:27,440 Speaker 3: since twenty twenty. She represented the Greens before quitting the 28 00:01:27,440 --> 00:01:28,280 Speaker 3: party this year. 29 00:01:29,280 --> 00:01:33,240 Speaker 2: Australia's annual plastic consumption each year produces the same amount 30 00:01:33,280 --> 00:01:37,080 Speaker 2: of greenhouse gases as five point seven million cars. The 31 00:01:37,120 --> 00:01:40,080 Speaker 2: findings were in a report from the Australian Marine Conservation 32 00:01:40,200 --> 00:01:44,520 Speaker 2: Society and WWF Australia. IF forecasts that plastic emissions will 33 00:01:44,560 --> 00:01:48,320 Speaker 2: more than double by twenty fifty under current projections. 34 00:01:48,920 --> 00:01:51,600 Speaker 3: At least six people have been killed in a stabbing 35 00:01:51,640 --> 00:01:55,520 Speaker 3: attack at a kindergarten in China. Three children, two parents 36 00:01:55,560 --> 00:01:59,000 Speaker 3: and a teacher are the victims. According to AFP News Agency, 37 00:01:59,600 --> 00:02:01,520 Speaker 3: suspect has been arrested. 38 00:02:02,040 --> 00:02:04,640 Speaker 2: And today's good news is in the eye of the beholder. 39 00:02:04,720 --> 00:02:07,640 Speaker 2: I think A new population of a rare native rodent 40 00:02:07,760 --> 00:02:12,200 Speaker 2: species has been detected in Victoria. The broad toothed rat 41 00:02:12,480 --> 00:02:15,400 Speaker 2: was found by a four year old detection dog named moss. 42 00:02:15,760 --> 00:02:18,040 Speaker 2: The discovery has been hailed as a win for conservation 43 00:02:18,120 --> 00:02:24,480 Speaker 2: efforts of the declining species and a loss for Zara sidelines. Zara, 44 00:02:24,520 --> 00:02:25,799 Speaker 2: are you on threads yet? 45 00:02:26,040 --> 00:02:26,880 Speaker 3: I am on Threads? 46 00:02:27,040 --> 00:02:27,760 Speaker 2: How are you finding it? 47 00:02:28,760 --> 00:02:31,160 Speaker 3: Look? I think it's pretty like. I think that it 48 00:02:31,280 --> 00:02:34,880 Speaker 3: is esthetically very pleasing to scroll on. I think that 49 00:02:34,919 --> 00:02:39,040 Speaker 3: it promotes hot takes, and I myself and not someone 50 00:02:39,240 --> 00:02:41,080 Speaker 3: that is good at hot takes, I like, take a 51 00:02:41,120 --> 00:02:43,600 Speaker 3: long time to be funny, takes me quite a bit 52 00:02:43,639 --> 00:02:46,320 Speaker 3: of explanation, which is probably taking away from the joke, 53 00:02:46,800 --> 00:02:49,080 Speaker 3: and that doesn't feel like the platform for me. 54 00:02:49,440 --> 00:02:51,600 Speaker 2: It definitely feels like people are trying to find their 55 00:02:51,600 --> 00:02:53,040 Speaker 2: feet on the platform. 56 00:02:52,720 --> 00:02:53,560 Speaker 3: Not the daily I was there. 57 00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:57,080 Speaker 2: No, we are feet firmly on the ground. We're taking 58 00:02:57,320 --> 00:03:00,400 Speaker 2: everything in our stride over on threads, but we are 59 00:03:00,480 --> 00:03:02,400 Speaker 2: all jokes aside, still trying to work out what we 60 00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:04,600 Speaker 2: can offer on Threads that we can't offer on Instagram. 61 00:03:04,680 --> 00:03:06,680 Speaker 2: And it's even hard to know how to describe your 62 00:03:06,720 --> 00:03:08,960 Speaker 2: activity on the platform at the moment. I'm settling on 63 00:03:09,200 --> 00:03:12,519 Speaker 2: I threaded something, But we haven't quite found our groove there. 64 00:03:12,639 --> 00:03:15,320 Speaker 3: We haven't, And I feel like this is a really 65 00:03:15,400 --> 00:03:17,920 Speaker 3: annoying thing to listen to if you're not on Threads 66 00:03:17,960 --> 00:03:19,240 Speaker 3: and don't know what it is. 67 00:03:19,200 --> 00:03:21,519 Speaker 2: We're talking if you're not one of the seventy million. 68 00:03:21,360 --> 00:03:24,720 Speaker 3: Exactly, So, way to give people foma? Do you want 69 00:03:24,720 --> 00:03:26,800 Speaker 3: to take us back to the beginning? What is Threads? 70 00:03:26,840 --> 00:03:27,800 Speaker 3: What do people need to know? 71 00:03:28,120 --> 00:03:28,200 Speaker 1: So? 72 00:03:28,280 --> 00:03:31,080 Speaker 2: Threads is a text based social media app. It's owned 73 00:03:31,120 --> 00:03:34,880 Speaker 2: by Meta and that's the parent company of Facebook and Instagram. 74 00:03:35,160 --> 00:03:37,280 Speaker 2: It does have a bit of a look and feel 75 00:03:37,360 --> 00:03:40,720 Speaker 2: like Twitter. It's supposed to be a text based extension 76 00:03:40,840 --> 00:03:43,400 Speaker 2: of Instagram. And the way that you get a Threads 77 00:03:43,440 --> 00:03:47,400 Speaker 2: account is literally one click, and it imports over your 78 00:03:47,440 --> 00:03:51,200 Speaker 2: existing Instagram account handle and people you follow, and it's 79 00:03:51,280 --> 00:03:53,160 Speaker 2: really easy to set up and get started. 80 00:03:53,280 --> 00:03:55,000 Speaker 3: That's something I want to talk about later because I 81 00:03:55,000 --> 00:03:57,680 Speaker 3: think that is the key to its success. But go on. 82 00:03:58,040 --> 00:04:00,560 Speaker 2: So, Threads users are allowed to post up to five 83 00:04:00,640 --> 00:04:03,920 Speaker 2: hundred characters in length and videos of up to five minutes. 84 00:04:04,000 --> 00:04:06,800 Speaker 2: Now that's compared to Twitter's limits of two hundred and 85 00:04:06,800 --> 00:04:09,760 Speaker 2: eighty characters and two and a half minute videos for 86 00:04:09,960 --> 00:04:14,200 Speaker 2: unverified accounts, and it certainly has taken off over the weekend. 87 00:04:14,320 --> 00:04:18,039 Speaker 2: Mark Zuckerberg posted on Threads that the app had seventy 88 00:04:18,160 --> 00:04:21,640 Speaker 2: million users, which he said was way beyond their expectations, 89 00:04:22,400 --> 00:04:24,880 Speaker 2: and just based on the conversations I'm having and even 90 00:04:24,920 --> 00:04:28,680 Speaker 2: seeing things on other platforms like LinkedIn or even on Twitter, 91 00:04:29,279 --> 00:04:31,080 Speaker 2: it really does feel like the launch has been a 92 00:04:31,160 --> 00:04:32,200 Speaker 2: huge success. Look. 93 00:04:32,240 --> 00:04:35,279 Speaker 3: I think that while the interface is quite nice to 94 00:04:35,360 --> 00:04:37,920 Speaker 3: look at and it's something new, a lot of its 95 00:04:37,920 --> 00:04:40,560 Speaker 3: success can be attributed to the fact that it is 96 00:04:40,680 --> 00:04:43,479 Speaker 3: super easy to migrate across from Instagram, and it's like 97 00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:44,560 Speaker 3: one click and you're there. 98 00:04:44,760 --> 00:04:47,800 Speaker 2: And when you're there, after integrating everyone from Instagram, you 99 00:04:47,800 --> 00:04:50,000 Speaker 2: feel like that community's already built in for you. It's 100 00:04:50,120 --> 00:04:53,039 Speaker 2: very familiar faces and you're seeing very familiar accounts be 101 00:04:53,120 --> 00:04:56,160 Speaker 2: active on the platform. But there are a few criticisms 102 00:04:56,240 --> 00:04:58,880 Speaker 2: of Threads. There are some features that people love on 103 00:04:58,920 --> 00:05:02,520 Speaker 2: Twitter that don't exis yet on Threads, particularly like no 104 00:05:02,680 --> 00:05:06,920 Speaker 2: discovery page and no ability to pinposts. There's also been 105 00:05:06,960 --> 00:05:10,719 Speaker 2: a really interesting discussion online about the data that Threads 106 00:05:10,960 --> 00:05:13,680 Speaker 2: asks for when you download it as an app onto 107 00:05:13,680 --> 00:05:16,279 Speaker 2: your phone, and there are some concerns that it's quite 108 00:05:16,279 --> 00:05:19,240 Speaker 2: invasive with what it connects to, and there's also some 109 00:05:19,320 --> 00:05:21,560 Speaker 2: criticism about what happens if you want to delete your 110 00:05:21,600 --> 00:05:25,000 Speaker 2: Threads account, So at the moment to delete your Threads account, 111 00:05:25,080 --> 00:05:28,679 Speaker 2: you actually need to also delete your Instagram account, Although 112 00:05:28,720 --> 00:05:31,919 Speaker 2: the CEO of Instagram, Adamisari, has said they're working on 113 00:05:32,040 --> 00:05:32,479 Speaker 2: changing that. 114 00:05:32,720 --> 00:05:36,880 Speaker 3: I mean, all of those criticisms seem very logical and 115 00:05:36,880 --> 00:05:38,960 Speaker 3: well thought out. The one thing that I keep coming 116 00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:41,520 Speaker 3: back to is why did they build a separate app. 117 00:05:41,880 --> 00:05:44,720 Speaker 3: Why was it not just an integration on Instagram? Why 118 00:05:44,760 --> 00:05:48,240 Speaker 3: are you taking people away from Instagram to another app 119 00:05:48,600 --> 00:05:51,760 Speaker 3: that has exactly the same feel as Instagram. If they 120 00:05:51,760 --> 00:05:54,480 Speaker 3: were confident with Instagram when they've just built that feature in, 121 00:05:54,720 --> 00:05:55,159 Speaker 3: I guess. 122 00:05:54,960 --> 00:05:57,040 Speaker 2: They've always run their business on that. I mean, they 123 00:05:57,080 --> 00:05:58,320 Speaker 2: own WhatsApp, and they. 124 00:05:58,200 --> 00:05:59,919 Speaker 3: Own they probably are doing a bit better than me. 125 00:06:00,440 --> 00:06:02,479 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think we'll leave the social media networks to 126 00:06:02,520 --> 00:06:06,080 Speaker 2: the pros. But what's really interesting about the social media 127 00:06:06,200 --> 00:06:09,839 Speaker 2: landscape is that you can't isolate the launch of Threads 128 00:06:09,920 --> 00:06:13,440 Speaker 2: from what else has happened in social media land, particularly 129 00:06:13,520 --> 00:06:14,719 Speaker 2: what's happened at Twitter. 130 00:06:14,920 --> 00:06:17,560 Speaker 3: Yeah, the timing, I mean it was quite impeccable. It 131 00:06:17,600 --> 00:06:20,920 Speaker 3: was clearly dropped at a time when people are beginning 132 00:06:20,960 --> 00:06:23,000 Speaker 3: to turn away from Twitter, or where there's at least 133 00:06:23,040 --> 00:06:24,799 Speaker 3: some controversy with Twitter right. 134 00:06:24,640 --> 00:06:27,279 Speaker 2: Well, people have been feeling this way about Twitter for 135 00:06:27,320 --> 00:06:29,600 Speaker 2: a while. It all started in April of last year, 136 00:06:29,600 --> 00:06:32,360 Speaker 2: when Twitter announced it had agreed to a full takeover 137 00:06:32,520 --> 00:06:36,720 Speaker 2: by billionaire Elon Musk for about forty four billion US dollars. 138 00:06:37,120 --> 00:06:39,359 Speaker 2: I read a stat over the weekend that said that 139 00:06:39,440 --> 00:06:42,719 Speaker 2: Elon Musk could have bought the sixteen biggest football teams 140 00:06:42,760 --> 00:06:45,080 Speaker 2: in the world for how much he paid for Twitter. 141 00:06:45,320 --> 00:06:48,800 Speaker 2: But soon after Musk announced the takeover, he tried to 142 00:06:48,839 --> 00:06:52,440 Speaker 2: abandon the deal in July, and then he eventually agreed 143 00:06:52,440 --> 00:06:54,640 Speaker 2: to go through with the deal after Twitter brought legal 144 00:06:54,680 --> 00:06:58,080 Speaker 2: action against him. When he took ownership of the company, 145 00:06:58,200 --> 00:07:01,360 Speaker 2: he fired about half of twitter'st and announced they would 146 00:07:01,400 --> 00:07:04,599 Speaker 2: change how verification worked so that blue tick that was 147 00:07:04,640 --> 00:07:06,120 Speaker 2: next to the Daily Oza's account for. 148 00:07:06,040 --> 00:07:08,800 Speaker 3: Example, and our names, yes, very upsetting. 149 00:07:08,920 --> 00:07:11,480 Speaker 2: You needed to now pay for that blue tick. There's 150 00:07:11,520 --> 00:07:14,400 Speaker 2: been plenty of dramatic moments since then. There was a 151 00:07:14,440 --> 00:07:17,280 Speaker 2: time that Musk briefly banned some journalists who are writing 152 00:07:17,320 --> 00:07:19,960 Speaker 2: about him, and he banned the account elon Jet, which 153 00:07:20,040 --> 00:07:23,560 Speaker 2: tracked his private jets movements. Across the globe. There was 154 00:07:23,600 --> 00:07:26,040 Speaker 2: even a time where he posted a poll asking if 155 00:07:26,080 --> 00:07:29,200 Speaker 2: he should step down from Twitter as the CEO, which 156 00:07:29,200 --> 00:07:31,720 Speaker 2: he has done, which he did do. Linda Yakarino took 157 00:07:31,760 --> 00:07:34,240 Speaker 2: over the job in June, but Mask is very much 158 00:07:34,280 --> 00:07:37,400 Speaker 2: an active force of the company. The latest chapter in 159 00:07:37,440 --> 00:07:40,680 Speaker 2: the Twitter saga was only last week when Elon Musk 160 00:07:40,720 --> 00:07:43,800 Speaker 2: announced restrictions on how many tweets you could see per day, 161 00:07:43,920 --> 00:07:47,680 Speaker 2: and that really angered users. That actually coincided quite nicely 162 00:07:47,720 --> 00:07:51,440 Speaker 2: with Threads bringing forward their planned release date, some speculating 163 00:07:51,480 --> 00:07:54,120 Speaker 2: they did so to capitalize on the chaos at Twitter. 164 00:07:54,280 --> 00:07:56,600 Speaker 3: And so in light of that, I mean, there's clearly 165 00:07:56,680 --> 00:07:59,480 Speaker 3: a tension between the two platforms and between the two 166 00:07:59,840 --> 00:08:03,880 Speaker 3: billionaires who are in control of them. How has Twitter 167 00:08:03,920 --> 00:08:07,360 Speaker 3: actually responded to the rise of Threads, especially I mean 168 00:08:07,440 --> 00:08:10,280 Speaker 3: considering there were seventy million people who joined in a 169 00:08:10,320 --> 00:08:11,560 Speaker 3: weekend or whatever it was. 170 00:08:11,720 --> 00:08:15,240 Speaker 2: So Twitter is basically claiming Threads is copying them and 171 00:08:15,320 --> 00:08:18,520 Speaker 2: is planning on suing. In a legal letter first published 172 00:08:18,520 --> 00:08:22,440 Speaker 2: by news outlets Semaphore, Twitter lawyer Alex Spirou accused Meta 173 00:08:22,560 --> 00:08:27,520 Speaker 2: of systemic, wilful and unlawful misappropriation of Twitter's trade secrets 174 00:08:27,760 --> 00:08:31,360 Speaker 2: and other intellectual property. And remember how I said that 175 00:08:31,600 --> 00:08:35,080 Speaker 2: after Musk took over Twitter, he fired thousands of staff. Well, 176 00:08:35,160 --> 00:08:39,520 Speaker 2: Twitter's lawyers now have accused Meta of hiring dozens of 177 00:08:39,559 --> 00:08:43,439 Speaker 2: former Twitter staff members to build threads. The letter said 178 00:08:43,440 --> 00:08:47,840 Speaker 2: Twitter would strictly enforce its intellectual property rights. Elon Musk 179 00:08:47,880 --> 00:08:52,960 Speaker 2: tweeted that competition is fine, cheating is not. Unsurprisingly, Meta 180 00:08:53,040 --> 00:08:56,680 Speaker 2: denies the allegations, saying they didn't have any former Twitter 181 00:08:56,720 --> 00:09:00,360 Speaker 2: engineers working on the app. It's worth mentioning that the 182 00:09:00,520 --> 00:09:05,000 Speaker 2: US copyright law doesn't actually protect ideas, so this case 183 00:09:05,120 --> 00:09:08,160 Speaker 2: is unlikely to hold up in court unless Twitter can 184 00:09:08,200 --> 00:09:11,840 Speaker 2: prove that its own intellectual property was stolen something here 185 00:09:11,920 --> 00:09:13,560 Speaker 2: like programming codes for example. 186 00:09:13,760 --> 00:09:17,400 Speaker 3: So, Sam, before we finish every week in our newsletter, 187 00:09:17,600 --> 00:09:20,400 Speaker 3: which you can sign up to, in our show notes, 188 00:09:21,240 --> 00:09:23,560 Speaker 3: we do something in the intro called two truths and 189 00:09:23,600 --> 00:09:27,280 Speaker 3: a Lie, and it's basically that we present three headlines. 190 00:09:27,600 --> 00:09:30,120 Speaker 3: Two of them are true, as the name would imply, 191 00:09:30,280 --> 00:09:32,199 Speaker 3: and one of them is a lie. And a couple 192 00:09:32,200 --> 00:09:34,760 Speaker 3: of weeks ago we did a two truths and a 193 00:09:34,800 --> 00:09:38,520 Speaker 3: Lie that was Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg have agreed 194 00:09:38,559 --> 00:09:41,040 Speaker 3: to a cage fight. Yeah, when I read it thought 195 00:09:41,080 --> 00:09:43,240 Speaker 3: it was a lie. Turns out it's true. 196 00:09:43,200 --> 00:09:47,000 Speaker 2: Very much true. Elon Musk caught Wins that a competitor 197 00:09:47,120 --> 00:09:49,320 Speaker 2: to Twitter was going to be announced by Mark Zuckerberg, 198 00:09:49,360 --> 00:09:52,760 Speaker 2: and he challenged Mark Zuckerberg to a cage match. Zuckerberg 199 00:09:52,800 --> 00:09:55,720 Speaker 2: then posted a screenshot of that sweet and wrote a 200 00:09:55,760 --> 00:09:59,560 Speaker 2: caption of send me location. Musk then suggested Vegas a 201 00:09:59,600 --> 00:10:01,720 Speaker 2: very good play to have a cage fight. The New 202 00:10:01,800 --> 00:10:04,400 Speaker 2: York Times actually have reported that the pair have been 203 00:10:04,480 --> 00:10:09,040 Speaker 2: in conversations with the UFC to organize this throwdown of 204 00:10:09,080 --> 00:10:12,600 Speaker 2: the billionaires. Of course, there's been all the appropriate Internet 205 00:10:12,600 --> 00:10:15,920 Speaker 2: commentary about how Zuckerberg does indeed do martial arts and 206 00:10:16,000 --> 00:10:20,120 Speaker 2: Elon Musk isn't exactly known for his athletic ability. But honestly, 207 00:10:20,520 --> 00:10:23,240 Speaker 2: they can throw all the punches they like in a cage. 208 00:10:23,360 --> 00:10:25,240 Speaker 2: I think the real winner here is going to be 209 00:10:25,360 --> 00:10:29,360 Speaker 2: which of these two social platforms actually does emerge victorious 210 00:10:29,559 --> 00:10:34,480 Speaker 2: In an extremely tumultuous time for short text based social media. 211 00:10:34,840 --> 00:10:38,720 Speaker 3: Hearing about two of the world's most powerful men wanting 212 00:10:38,760 --> 00:10:41,480 Speaker 3: to fight in a cage brought something to mind, A 213 00:10:41,520 --> 00:10:44,480 Speaker 3: phrase to mind, and then it turns out that Elon 214 00:10:44,600 --> 00:10:46,920 Speaker 3: Musk thought the very same, and he tweeted, and I'll 215 00:10:46,960 --> 00:10:49,320 Speaker 3: just put a bit of a parental advisory on this one. 216 00:10:49,960 --> 00:10:54,199 Speaker 3: But Elon Musk tweeted, I propose a literal dick measuring contest. 217 00:10:56,320 --> 00:10:59,760 Speaker 2: I'm so sorry to all the families listening right now. 218 00:11:00,200 --> 00:11:02,439 Speaker 2: Never descend into this normally at the Daily OSS. 219 00:11:02,400 --> 00:11:04,800 Speaker 3: No, but all jokes aside. I think, just as a 220 00:11:04,880 --> 00:11:07,080 Speaker 3: last note, there is something to be said for the 221 00:11:07,120 --> 00:11:09,680 Speaker 3: fact that these two men who are agreeing to a 222 00:11:09,720 --> 00:11:12,559 Speaker 3: cage fight are also in control of two of the 223 00:11:12,600 --> 00:11:15,840 Speaker 3: biggest social media platforms in the world, and with that 224 00:11:15,880 --> 00:11:20,600 Speaker 3: comes great responsibility for how democratic messages are conveyed and communicated. 225 00:11:21,080 --> 00:11:23,240 Speaker 3: And I think, if nothing else, we should just think 226 00:11:23,240 --> 00:11:24,520 Speaker 3: about that in times like this. 227 00:11:27,320 --> 00:11:29,800 Speaker 2: Thank you for joining us on the Daily ODS this morning. 228 00:11:30,080 --> 00:11:32,719 Speaker 2: If you learn something from today's episode, don't forget to 229 00:11:32,800 --> 00:11:35,480 Speaker 2: hit subscribe so there's a TDA episode waiting for you 230 00:11:35,559 --> 00:11:38,560 Speaker 2: every morning. We'll be back again tomorrow. Until then, have 231 00:11:38,640 --> 00:11:46,000 Speaker 2: a great day.