1 00:00:04,040 --> 00:00:06,479 Speaker 1: It's the Happy Families podcast. 2 00:00:07,000 --> 00:00:10,280 Speaker 2: It's the podcast for the time poor parent who just 3 00:00:10,400 --> 00:00:11,520 Speaker 2: once answers. Now. 4 00:00:14,600 --> 00:00:17,440 Speaker 1: So I've just finished reading book, Kylie. It's called Get Married. 5 00:00:18,040 --> 00:00:20,680 Speaker 1: Get Married is the like just picking it up and 6 00:00:20,720 --> 00:00:23,279 Speaker 1: looking at it. Get Married. It's a provocative title for 7 00:00:23,360 --> 00:00:26,440 Speaker 1: a book. Get Married by a University of Virginia sociologist. 8 00:00:26,520 --> 00:00:29,000 Speaker 1: He's also the lead researcher on a project in the 9 00:00:29,080 --> 00:00:31,920 Speaker 1: United States called the National Marriage Project. His name is 10 00:00:31,920 --> 00:00:33,680 Speaker 1: Professor Brad Wilcox. 11 00:00:34,320 --> 00:00:37,320 Speaker 2: It's interesting that that's the title of his book when 12 00:00:37,720 --> 00:00:41,280 Speaker 2: my understanding is that marriage numbers are declining. 13 00:00:42,000 --> 00:00:44,479 Speaker 1: They actually are across the Western world. Fewer people are 14 00:00:44,479 --> 00:00:49,320 Speaker 1: getting married. Partnering is as popular as ever. But making 15 00:00:49,320 --> 00:00:53,000 Speaker 1: the commitment to sign up for a lifetime of monogamy, 16 00:00:53,240 --> 00:00:53,640 Speaker 1: I thought. 17 00:00:53,479 --> 00:00:56,640 Speaker 2: You want to say misery, no, no, no monogamy. 18 00:00:56,720 --> 00:00:59,080 Speaker 1: In fact, well, here's the interesting thing about the book. 19 00:00:59,320 --> 00:01:01,920 Speaker 1: The research that if you can have a happy, safe, 20 00:01:02,320 --> 00:01:06,040 Speaker 1: supportive marriage, it's the golden ticket to happiness. It's one 21 00:01:06,080 --> 00:01:08,920 Speaker 1: of the best predictors. In fact, it is the best 22 00:01:08,920 --> 00:01:12,520 Speaker 1: predictor of happiness in our lives. Check this out. I 23 00:01:12,600 --> 00:01:15,680 Speaker 1: found something just finding the stat here. The odds of 24 00:01:15,720 --> 00:01:18,760 Speaker 1: being very happy increased by sixty four percent if you 25 00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:21,960 Speaker 1: have a college degree of those who don't. In other words, 26 00:01:21,959 --> 00:01:24,640 Speaker 1: people who have a university degree a sixty four percent 27 00:01:24,680 --> 00:01:28,480 Speaker 1: more likely to be very happy than those without the degree. Oh, 28 00:01:28,520 --> 00:01:30,120 Speaker 1: by the way, I should just highlight I'm about to 29 00:01:30,120 --> 00:01:31,679 Speaker 1: say a whole lot of provocative stuff. I'm not in 30 00:01:31,720 --> 00:01:33,720 Speaker 1: a soap box here, I'm just looking at pure stats. Okay. 31 00:01:34,040 --> 00:01:36,400 Speaker 1: It doesn't mean that if you don't have a university 32 00:01:36,480 --> 00:01:39,280 Speaker 1: degree you can't be happy. It just means that the 33 00:01:39,280 --> 00:01:42,000 Speaker 1: odds are being very happy go up by sixty four 34 00:01:42,040 --> 00:01:44,000 Speaker 1: percent if you've got that degree. Plenty of people with 35 00:01:44,040 --> 00:01:46,440 Speaker 1: degrees are miserable, and plenty of people without degrees are 36 00:01:46,440 --> 00:01:49,840 Speaker 1: wonderfully happy. This is just on average, statistically, that's how 37 00:01:49,840 --> 00:01:53,000 Speaker 1: it goes. Odds of being very happy with higher income 38 00:01:53,520 --> 00:01:57,960 Speaker 1: increased by eighty eight percent. If you're very satisfied with 39 00:01:58,000 --> 00:02:00,520 Speaker 1: your work, the odds of being very happy increased by 40 00:02:00,520 --> 00:02:02,720 Speaker 1: one hundred and forty five percent. Of those who are 41 00:02:02,720 --> 00:02:05,720 Speaker 1: not happy with their work, the odds are being very 42 00:02:05,760 --> 00:02:10,239 Speaker 1: happy increase by one hundred and fifty one percent if 43 00:02:10,240 --> 00:02:13,359 Speaker 1: you're married over those who are not married. But get this, 44 00:02:14,240 --> 00:02:17,239 Speaker 1: if you are in a very happy marriage compared to 45 00:02:17,280 --> 00:02:18,920 Speaker 1: those who are not married. To those who are not 46 00:02:18,960 --> 00:02:21,480 Speaker 1: in a happy marriage, the odds are being very happy 47 00:02:21,520 --> 00:02:26,200 Speaker 1: increased by five hundred and forty five percent. Marriage predicts 48 00:02:26,200 --> 00:02:29,720 Speaker 1: happiness better than education, better than work, better than money. 49 00:02:29,840 --> 00:02:32,120 Speaker 1: It's an astounding stat. 50 00:02:31,840 --> 00:02:33,760 Speaker 2: So how do you do the mass on something like that. 51 00:02:33,880 --> 00:02:36,919 Speaker 1: I like, it's a big number. 52 00:02:37,720 --> 00:02:39,760 Speaker 2: I'm struggling with my words because I'm actually looking at 53 00:02:39,760 --> 00:02:43,639 Speaker 2: the graph, and when you look at it pictorially, you've 54 00:02:43,680 --> 00:02:46,320 Speaker 2: got a teeny tiny little blue line down here for 55 00:02:46,400 --> 00:02:50,320 Speaker 2: sixty four percent, and then it's like having a I 56 00:02:50,320 --> 00:02:52,640 Speaker 2: don't know, two hundred story building right next to it. 57 00:02:52,840 --> 00:02:56,320 Speaker 2: This five hundred and fifty five percent, five hundred and 58 00:02:56,400 --> 00:02:59,480 Speaker 2: forty five sorry, h five hundred and forty five percent 59 00:02:59,760 --> 00:03:03,280 Speaker 2: better chance of being very happy. 60 00:03:03,440 --> 00:03:06,240 Speaker 1: So simple way of looking at this is they simply 61 00:03:06,280 --> 00:03:09,040 Speaker 1: ask people whether well being is up to and then 62 00:03:09,080 --> 00:03:13,600 Speaker 1: they look at their various sociodemographic statistics. So, are you married, 63 00:03:13,639 --> 00:03:15,560 Speaker 1: you're not married, what sort of education level do you have? 64 00:03:16,360 --> 00:03:18,399 Speaker 1: All those kinds of things, and they literally just look 65 00:03:18,440 --> 00:03:21,960 Speaker 1: at the odds of scoring in the very high range 66 00:03:22,000 --> 00:03:24,680 Speaker 1: based on what those boxes are that you ticked and 67 00:03:24,720 --> 00:03:26,400 Speaker 1: so if you've ticked that box and said I'm in 68 00:03:26,440 --> 00:03:29,560 Speaker 1: a very happy marriage, the odds of you being very 69 00:03:29,600 --> 00:03:34,600 Speaker 1: happy are five and a half times greater than the 70 00:03:34,720 --> 00:03:36,920 Speaker 1: likelihood of you being happy if you're not in a 71 00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:37,920 Speaker 1: very happy marriage. 72 00:03:38,360 --> 00:03:38,760 Speaker 2: That's it. 73 00:03:38,760 --> 00:03:42,520 Speaker 1: It's it's actually pretty basic stats. But the truth of 74 00:03:42,560 --> 00:03:44,840 Speaker 1: it is that we don't do maths very well and 75 00:03:44,880 --> 00:03:47,640 Speaker 1: we're really bad with probabilities, and as a result, when 76 00:03:47,680 --> 00:03:49,520 Speaker 1: we look at these numbers, they can often not make 77 00:03:49,560 --> 00:03:51,320 Speaker 1: much sense. The other thing is it's kind of a 78 00:03:51,360 --> 00:03:53,960 Speaker 1: provocative and confronting thing to hear. Now again, I want 79 00:03:54,000 --> 00:03:55,920 Speaker 1: to emphasize there are people who are not in happy 80 00:03:55,960 --> 00:03:58,000 Speaker 1: marriages that can be happy. There are people who are 81 00:03:58,040 --> 00:04:00,600 Speaker 1: not married that are wonderfully happy. I know plenty of 82 00:04:00,720 --> 00:04:02,640 Speaker 1: married people who are kind of miserable. 83 00:04:02,200 --> 00:04:04,360 Speaker 2: As well, people who've got lots of money. 84 00:04:04,560 --> 00:04:07,400 Speaker 1: Right, Okay, So this is not just about the one 85 00:04:07,640 --> 00:04:10,880 Speaker 1: fact that what it's looking at, quite simply, very simply 86 00:04:11,400 --> 00:04:13,800 Speaker 1: is if you're in a good marriage, if you're in 87 00:04:13,800 --> 00:04:15,800 Speaker 1: a very happy marriage, you're much more likely to be 88 00:04:15,840 --> 00:04:18,400 Speaker 1: a happy person. So it's not about shaming anyone. It's 89 00:04:18,400 --> 00:04:20,880 Speaker 1: not about judging anyone. It's not about pointing fingers and 90 00:04:20,880 --> 00:04:23,400 Speaker 1: that sort of thing. These stats just point in that direction. 91 00:04:23,480 --> 00:04:25,760 Speaker 1: Here's another stat for you while we're on it. Children 92 00:04:25,800 --> 00:04:28,440 Speaker 1: who are raised in homes where parents are married are 93 00:04:28,520 --> 00:04:30,480 Speaker 1: much more likely to go to university. They're much more 94 00:04:30,520 --> 00:04:32,040 Speaker 1: likely to stay off drugs, They're much more likely to 95 00:04:32,040 --> 00:04:35,320 Speaker 1: be financially stable, they're more likely to generally stay out 96 00:04:35,320 --> 00:04:41,839 Speaker 1: of trouble. Intact families just an enormous increase in the 97 00:04:41,920 --> 00:04:44,719 Speaker 1: positive outcomes versus other families. Now, of course, there are 98 00:04:44,800 --> 00:04:48,800 Speaker 1: plenty of kids that come from alternative and diverse families 99 00:04:49,080 --> 00:04:52,839 Speaker 1: that have wonderful outcomes. It's just that you get more 100 00:04:53,120 --> 00:04:56,760 Speaker 1: positive outcomes with intact families where a couple are happily married. 101 00:04:57,440 --> 00:05:01,679 Speaker 1: One more stat. This is a really interesting one. People 102 00:05:01,720 --> 00:05:05,839 Speaker 1: who are married tend to enjoy much greater financial benefits 103 00:05:05,880 --> 00:05:08,480 Speaker 1: than those who are not, even if you're living in 104 00:05:08,520 --> 00:05:10,400 Speaker 1: a live in de facto relationship. 105 00:05:10,960 --> 00:05:16,000 Speaker 2: So I find this interesting because as parents with dependent children, 106 00:05:16,760 --> 00:05:20,480 Speaker 2: it feels like the financial strain is intense. 107 00:05:20,680 --> 00:05:23,520 Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah. So a two thousand and seven survey 108 00:05:23,560 --> 00:05:26,320 Speaker 1: of consumer finance looked at the median net worth of 109 00:05:26,320 --> 00:05:29,599 Speaker 1: households with children by family structure and what they found 110 00:05:30,160 --> 00:05:32,480 Speaker 1: was that the people who were doing the very best 111 00:05:32,520 --> 00:05:36,480 Speaker 1: were married and intact median net worth two hundred and 112 00:05:36,520 --> 00:05:38,400 Speaker 1: twenty eight thousand, two hundred dollars. Now, this start is 113 00:05:38,440 --> 00:05:42,240 Speaker 1: fifteen years old, but we see continued evidence of this. 114 00:05:43,000 --> 00:05:45,200 Speaker 1: Married in a step family, that two hundred and twenty 115 00:05:45,240 --> 00:05:49,159 Speaker 1: eight drops down to ninety six thousand, divorced, thirty two thousand, 116 00:05:50,160 --> 00:05:55,480 Speaker 1: cohabiting eighty nine hundred. I mean, the number just drops 117 00:05:55,560 --> 00:05:58,200 Speaker 1: precipitously from that two hundred and twenty eight thousand. Again, 118 00:05:58,400 --> 00:06:01,000 Speaker 1: this is net worth, and we're going back fifteen years. 119 00:06:01,279 --> 00:06:04,440 Speaker 1: But what research does show is that men who are 120 00:06:04,480 --> 00:06:07,000 Speaker 1: married earn twenty seven percent more than when they're unmarried. 121 00:06:07,440 --> 00:06:10,520 Speaker 1: Networth of both individuals is higher, they accumulate more assets, 122 00:06:10,520 --> 00:06:13,680 Speaker 1: they retire wealthier than their unmarried peers. It's the elephant 123 00:06:13,680 --> 00:06:15,240 Speaker 1: in the room. No one wants to talk about it, 124 00:06:15,800 --> 00:06:18,159 Speaker 1: and I'm sensitive to the fact that it's a it's 125 00:06:18,160 --> 00:06:22,240 Speaker 1: a tricky topic, but the data is really really clear. 126 00:06:22,279 --> 00:06:24,680 Speaker 1: When we look at the very biggest research projects across time, 127 00:06:24,720 --> 00:06:29,640 Speaker 1: they conclusively, conclusively point to marriage as being fundamental to 128 00:06:29,839 --> 00:06:32,120 Speaker 1: positive outcomes, well being, a life well lived. 129 00:06:39,320 --> 00:06:42,760 Speaker 2: So today we're going to talk about five mistakes we 130 00:06:42,800 --> 00:06:46,040 Speaker 2: want to avoid within our relationships so that we can 131 00:06:46,080 --> 00:06:47,960 Speaker 2: have very happy marriages. 132 00:06:48,279 --> 00:06:50,760 Speaker 1: So the first one is the me first mindset. Me 133 00:06:50,839 --> 00:06:53,600 Speaker 1: first mindset is pretty much talking about being selfish. It's 134 00:06:53,600 --> 00:06:57,520 Speaker 1: basically saying I'm not considering you. It's kryptonite to a marriage. 135 00:06:57,800 --> 00:07:01,400 Speaker 1: So I'll use a stereotypical exam a husband who feels 136 00:07:01,400 --> 00:07:03,200 Speaker 1: like he's entitled to a clean house and a dinner 137 00:07:03,240 --> 00:07:05,680 Speaker 1: on the table every night, and intimacy on and as 138 00:07:05,839 --> 00:07:06,839 Speaker 1: needs basis. 139 00:07:07,160 --> 00:07:09,520 Speaker 2: I think it could be even more simpler than that, though, 140 00:07:09,680 --> 00:07:13,000 Speaker 2: a husband who goes to work and his wife stays 141 00:07:13,000 --> 00:07:15,240 Speaker 2: at home and looks up after a brand new baby, 142 00:07:15,600 --> 00:07:18,840 Speaker 2: but just expects that his job is outside of the 143 00:07:18,840 --> 00:07:20,120 Speaker 2: house and her job's inside the house. 144 00:07:20,200 --> 00:07:21,920 Speaker 1: Yeah, or even worse, a husband who goes to work 145 00:07:21,960 --> 00:07:24,240 Speaker 1: and a wife who goes to work, but he still 146 00:07:24,240 --> 00:07:26,840 Speaker 1: thinks that she's going to carry the line's share of 147 00:07:26,920 --> 00:07:29,480 Speaker 1: the labor in terms of keeping the house maintained, in 148 00:07:29,520 --> 00:07:30,200 Speaker 1: that kind of thing. 149 00:07:30,080 --> 00:07:30,880 Speaker 2: And the mental load. 150 00:07:31,200 --> 00:07:33,600 Speaker 1: Yeah, So it's just this Essentially, it's a selfishness, like 151 00:07:33,680 --> 00:07:36,000 Speaker 1: I'll look after me and you look after everything else. 152 00:07:36,320 --> 00:07:39,480 Speaker 1: Maybe it's endlessly pursuing goal expense of the relationship whatever 153 00:07:39,520 --> 00:07:44,040 Speaker 1: it is. Regardless the scenario, selfishness subsumes any goodwill and 154 00:07:44,080 --> 00:07:48,080 Speaker 1: it raises resentment and crushes the companionship. There's another example 155 00:07:48,120 --> 00:07:50,160 Speaker 1: of me first mindsets as well, and that is when 156 00:07:50,240 --> 00:07:52,960 Speaker 1: somebody tries to mold their husband or wife into their 157 00:07:53,000 --> 00:07:55,600 Speaker 1: perfect version of who they want them to be or 158 00:07:55,600 --> 00:07:58,280 Speaker 1: who they think they would be as well. Like I'm 159 00:07:58,280 --> 00:08:00,760 Speaker 1: an outgoing person. If I'm constantly to get you to 160 00:08:00,760 --> 00:08:03,480 Speaker 1: be outgoing and you're not an outgoing person, I'm trying 161 00:08:03,480 --> 00:08:06,040 Speaker 1: to mold you into my perfect version of me because 162 00:08:06,040 --> 00:08:07,800 Speaker 1: I think I'm awesome and I think that's how life 163 00:08:07,840 --> 00:08:11,440 Speaker 1: should be. But it's not going to work because I'm 164 00:08:11,440 --> 00:08:14,480 Speaker 1: failing to understand your hopes and dreams and goals not 165 00:08:14,520 --> 00:08:15,960 Speaker 1: just for life, but maybe just for the next five 166 00:08:15,960 --> 00:08:19,400 Speaker 1: minutes while we're introducing ourselves to these people. And if 167 00:08:19,440 --> 00:08:23,520 Speaker 1: we can't calibrate appropriately, that selfishness causes a relationship to 168 00:08:23,520 --> 00:08:24,200 Speaker 1: come undone. 169 00:08:24,280 --> 00:08:28,000 Speaker 2: That's why we just do so well together. We're so different. 170 00:08:28,600 --> 00:08:30,960 Speaker 2: But I actually think while we haven't tried to change 171 00:08:31,000 --> 00:08:36,360 Speaker 2: each other, we've inadvertently taken on some of each other's traits. 172 00:08:37,080 --> 00:08:39,800 Speaker 2: And I used to be really shy. I didn't used 173 00:08:39,840 --> 00:08:42,120 Speaker 2: to kind of get out there in. 174 00:08:42,080 --> 00:08:44,040 Speaker 1: The early days. I was selfish and just thought that 175 00:08:44,080 --> 00:08:47,840 Speaker 1: you needed to be like me. Well, but I love 176 00:08:48,040 --> 00:08:50,720 Speaker 1: your differences to me. Now I just cherish them and 177 00:08:50,760 --> 00:08:51,640 Speaker 1: celebrate them now. 178 00:08:52,320 --> 00:08:54,040 Speaker 2: But you bounce off the walls all the time, and 179 00:08:54,080 --> 00:08:56,480 Speaker 2: so my nice quiet has kind of calmed you down 180 00:08:56,520 --> 00:08:57,800 Speaker 2: a little bit over time. 181 00:08:58,080 --> 00:09:00,400 Speaker 1: Maybe maybe just a bit, just a bit, I don't 182 00:09:00,400 --> 00:09:01,880 Speaker 1: know if that's your it's just me getting older and 183 00:09:01,880 --> 00:09:05,120 Speaker 1: feeling more tired. But either way, let's look at number two. 184 00:09:05,360 --> 00:09:08,319 Speaker 2: Number two is the maybe I do mindset. 185 00:09:08,360 --> 00:09:10,839 Speaker 1: Okay, this one is basically about commitment. People who question 186 00:09:10,880 --> 00:09:13,559 Speaker 1: commitment create conditions that are going to develop into a 187 00:09:15,559 --> 00:09:18,160 Speaker 1: lack of trust. If I don't feel like you're fully committed, 188 00:09:18,480 --> 00:09:20,400 Speaker 1: If I don't feel like you're fully committed, then I'm 189 00:09:20,440 --> 00:09:23,280 Speaker 1: not going to invest as much. And this is a 190 00:09:23,360 --> 00:09:25,959 Speaker 1: really provocative thing to say. I recognize this, but it's 191 00:09:25,960 --> 00:09:29,079 Speaker 1: based on solid evidence from one researcher in particular. His 192 00:09:29,160 --> 00:09:31,320 Speaker 1: name is Scott Stanley. He's done some work with Glenna Rhodes, 193 00:09:31,320 --> 00:09:33,079 Speaker 1: Howard Markman. These guys have been looking at this thing 194 00:09:33,120 --> 00:09:36,120 Speaker 1: called the cohabitation effect since the nineteen eighties, and what 195 00:09:36,160 --> 00:09:39,560 Speaker 1: their research shows is that when people slide into a 196 00:09:39,600 --> 00:09:42,720 Speaker 1: relationship rather than decide to get into a relationship, commitment 197 00:09:42,800 --> 00:09:45,280 Speaker 1: levels are lower, which means that investment levels are lower, 198 00:09:45,320 --> 00:09:48,839 Speaker 1: which means that trust levels are lower, and the corollary, 199 00:09:49,840 --> 00:09:54,920 Speaker 1: reduce commitment, reduce trust, poor a relationship quality. This is 200 00:09:55,360 --> 00:09:58,880 Speaker 1: the maybe I do mindset, and it seems to backfire 201 00:09:58,960 --> 00:10:00,600 Speaker 1: in terms of having a healthyer relationship. 202 00:10:01,240 --> 00:10:03,480 Speaker 2: A couple of weeks ago, we shared our story on 203 00:10:03,600 --> 00:10:07,040 Speaker 2: Valentine's Day how we met and the things that made 204 00:10:07,080 --> 00:10:11,640 Speaker 2: up our relationship, and you shared a story about our 205 00:10:11,760 --> 00:10:15,480 Speaker 2: early days in that first year. We had an altercation 206 00:10:15,600 --> 00:10:17,600 Speaker 2: at some point and I kind of looked at you 207 00:10:17,640 --> 00:10:19,079 Speaker 2: and said, well, if you feel like that, maybe we 208 00:10:19,080 --> 00:10:21,040 Speaker 2: should just get divorced and you know, save each other 209 00:10:21,080 --> 00:10:23,240 Speaker 2: a whole heap of trouble. And at that point you 210 00:10:23,280 --> 00:10:25,960 Speaker 2: acknowledged that that was a conversation that we would never 211 00:10:26,000 --> 00:10:29,240 Speaker 2: have again. That divorce wasn't kind of. 212 00:10:29,320 --> 00:10:31,040 Speaker 1: Not a word we'll say, and it's not an option 213 00:10:31,080 --> 00:10:33,199 Speaker 1: in this relationship because we do treat each other well 214 00:10:33,280 --> 00:10:34,880 Speaker 1: and we can just figure this stuff out. 215 00:10:35,480 --> 00:10:38,720 Speaker 2: And I think that that changed something in both of 216 00:10:38,800 --> 00:10:42,440 Speaker 2: us as we recognized that we were in this for 217 00:10:42,720 --> 00:10:45,440 Speaker 2: good and bad, that they were going to be challenging times, 218 00:10:45,480 --> 00:10:48,080 Speaker 2: but we were completely committed to one another and to 219 00:10:48,120 --> 00:10:49,800 Speaker 2: the relationship that we were creating. 220 00:10:50,200 --> 00:10:51,839 Speaker 1: It makes such a difference when we have a strong 221 00:10:51,840 --> 00:10:54,079 Speaker 1: commitment rather than maybe I do mindset. So number one, 222 00:10:54,120 --> 00:10:57,199 Speaker 1: the me first mindset guaranteed to undermine and harm your marriage. 223 00:10:57,280 --> 00:11:00,559 Speaker 1: Number two that maybe I do mindset. The third number 224 00:11:00,600 --> 00:11:04,560 Speaker 1: three expecting a soulmate marriage. No such thing as a soulmate. 225 00:11:04,840 --> 00:11:06,600 Speaker 1: Got to get over the idea that there's a soulmate. 226 00:11:06,720 --> 00:11:09,600 Speaker 1: If you think that a relationship is about intense emotion 227 00:11:09,760 --> 00:11:13,319 Speaker 1: and romantic connection, it's almost certain that you're going to 228 00:11:13,360 --> 00:11:16,840 Speaker 1: be crushed at some point when the emotion subsides and 229 00:11:16,880 --> 00:11:21,240 Speaker 1: the romantic connection dims. The best research that I found 230 00:11:21,240 --> 00:11:23,599 Speaker 1: in this show is that if you're expecting a soulmate marriage, 231 00:11:24,000 --> 00:11:27,880 Speaker 1: you should be prepared for a new relationship sometime in 232 00:11:27,920 --> 00:11:31,120 Speaker 1: the future because soilmates simply don't exist. It's fine to 233 00:11:31,120 --> 00:11:34,439 Speaker 1: have a whole lot of romance and togethern is happening, 234 00:11:34,760 --> 00:11:40,280 Speaker 1: but relationships are also about children and commitment and financial 235 00:11:40,360 --> 00:11:44,319 Speaker 1: stuff and stuff. Yeah, that's right, stuff and you usually 236 00:11:44,400 --> 00:11:46,200 Speaker 1: find that your soulmate isn't quite the person that you 237 00:11:46,200 --> 00:11:48,440 Speaker 1: thought that they were when the rubber hits the road, 238 00:11:48,480 --> 00:11:50,880 Speaker 1: when randomness and volatility start to hit you. 239 00:11:51,520 --> 00:11:54,479 Speaker 2: Having been through twenty five years. 240 00:11:54,240 --> 00:11:57,520 Speaker 1: Together, hey, excuse me, excuse me? Twenty five years? Can 241 00:11:57,559 --> 00:12:00,960 Speaker 1: I just mention this? We have approximately thirteen days until 242 00:12:01,000 --> 00:12:01,960 Speaker 1: it's twenty six. 243 00:12:01,960 --> 00:12:06,720 Speaker 2: Twenty six years, I know, but we're still at twenty five. OK. Fine. 244 00:12:07,280 --> 00:12:11,480 Speaker 2: What we have experienced is that beautiful ebb and flow 245 00:12:11,679 --> 00:12:16,120 Speaker 2: of life together. And sometimes things are cruising and we 246 00:12:16,200 --> 00:12:19,600 Speaker 2: feel like we're flying on cloud nine, and other times 247 00:12:19,600 --> 00:12:22,199 Speaker 2: we feel like we're in the depths of I don't know, 248 00:12:22,440 --> 00:12:25,000 Speaker 2: some swamp in the middle of nowhere. It gets really 249 00:12:25,040 --> 00:12:29,720 Speaker 2: really hard. But having that absolute knowledge that yours committed 250 00:12:29,760 --> 00:12:33,160 Speaker 2: to the relationship as I am, means that we can 251 00:12:33,240 --> 00:12:35,720 Speaker 2: work through that and recognize and know that and we're 252 00:12:35,720 --> 00:12:37,800 Speaker 2: not going to stay down in that swamp forever. That 253 00:12:37,800 --> 00:12:39,679 Speaker 2: there's going to be another mountain peak and we're going 254 00:12:39,720 --> 00:12:41,720 Speaker 2: to enjoy life again together. 255 00:12:42,240 --> 00:12:45,680 Speaker 1: Number four failure to connects. If you want to harm 256 00:12:45,720 --> 00:12:51,760 Speaker 1: your marriage, just stop connecting. Connection means seeing, hearing, valuing technology, interfairs, priorities, compete, 257 00:12:51,760 --> 00:12:56,880 Speaker 1: life gets really busy, babies, you get exhausted. Intimate quality declines. 258 00:12:57,240 --> 00:13:00,400 Speaker 1: Not for everyone, but for many people. The amount of 259 00:13:00,400 --> 00:13:02,520 Speaker 1: effort you put in reduces because you've got to put 260 00:13:02,559 --> 00:13:05,480 Speaker 1: effort into so many other places. Date night, date night disappears, 261 00:13:06,559 --> 00:13:10,080 Speaker 1: and all of our best intentioned efforts start to fail 262 00:13:10,160 --> 00:13:13,360 Speaker 1: because of just running house. Running a life gets in 263 00:13:13,400 --> 00:13:16,360 Speaker 1: the way. Failure to connect is a guaranteed way to 264 00:13:17,160 --> 00:13:20,000 Speaker 1: harm your marriage. Got to find ways, got to find times, 265 00:13:20,000 --> 00:13:22,959 Speaker 1: got to find the capacity to prioritize and see here 266 00:13:23,000 --> 00:13:23,800 Speaker 1: and value one another. 267 00:13:24,000 --> 00:13:26,240 Speaker 2: I think the magic word here is intention. 268 00:13:26,720 --> 00:13:29,040 Speaker 1: I'd go further. It's not just about having the intention, 269 00:13:29,120 --> 00:13:32,280 Speaker 1: it's actually putting into action. I intend to connect with you, 270 00:13:32,360 --> 00:13:35,600 Speaker 1: but I get busy. Intention isn't quite far enough. There's 271 00:13:35,640 --> 00:13:37,920 Speaker 1: that old saying that the road to hell is paved 272 00:13:37,960 --> 00:13:40,680 Speaker 1: with good intentions. You can intend to do this and 273 00:13:40,720 --> 00:13:42,920 Speaker 1: intend to do that. I think it actually requires action. 274 00:13:43,040 --> 00:13:46,120 Speaker 1: It requires connection and commitment, and that's what makes the 275 00:13:46,120 --> 00:13:48,080 Speaker 1: marriage work. If you want to harm your marriage, just 276 00:13:48,559 --> 00:13:50,200 Speaker 1: focus on intention rather than action. 277 00:13:50,480 --> 00:13:55,160 Speaker 2: Well, number five is being around others who don't value marriage. 278 00:13:55,240 --> 00:13:58,040 Speaker 1: You want to hear some crazy stats. This from a 279 00:13:58,080 --> 00:14:02,439 Speaker 1: researcher named roseen Quist and colleagues who said this. In 280 00:14:02,480 --> 00:14:05,240 Speaker 1: one of their studies, they found that the likelihood of 281 00:14:05,280 --> 00:14:09,720 Speaker 1: divorce increased by seventy five percent for individuals with a 282 00:14:09,720 --> 00:14:11,760 Speaker 1: divorce friend. Let me say that again, if your friends 283 00:14:11,760 --> 00:14:14,640 Speaker 1: are divorced, your chances of divorce go up by seventy 284 00:14:14,679 --> 00:14:18,400 Speaker 1: five percent. Some other researchers, McPherson and colleagues found that 285 00:14:18,480 --> 00:14:22,360 Speaker 1: this effect extends to friends of friends. So if you 286 00:14:22,440 --> 00:14:26,520 Speaker 1: are one degree of separation removed from the divorce se 287 00:14:27,000 --> 00:14:30,360 Speaker 1: you're still at a thirty three percent higher chance of divorce. 288 00:14:31,080 --> 00:14:34,680 Speaker 1: So there's this ripple effect. There's a divorce contagion, you 289 00:14:34,720 --> 00:14:38,840 Speaker 1: might even call it divorce ideation, where within social circles 290 00:14:39,120 --> 00:14:42,600 Speaker 1: there's going to be some influence on attitudes and behaviors. 291 00:14:42,920 --> 00:14:45,880 Speaker 1: Well beyond just the people involved in the divorce. Friends 292 00:14:45,920 --> 00:14:49,360 Speaker 1: and even friends of friends are at increased risk of divorce. 293 00:14:49,720 --> 00:14:52,560 Speaker 2: I remember, just after I finished high school, I caught 294 00:14:52,640 --> 00:14:55,480 Speaker 2: up with one of my high school teachers. I absolutely 295 00:14:55,560 --> 00:14:58,320 Speaker 2: idolized this woman. She was amazing, and she was so 296 00:14:58,360 --> 00:15:02,840 Speaker 2: instrumental in me getting through year twelve, but loving my 297 00:15:03,000 --> 00:15:06,240 Speaker 2: class with her and you and I were engaged by 298 00:15:06,240 --> 00:15:09,080 Speaker 2: that stage. But I was going through this a little 299 00:15:09,080 --> 00:15:12,240 Speaker 2: bit of an epiphany in my own life, and I 300 00:15:12,280 --> 00:15:15,200 Speaker 2: had never had someone believe in me the way you did. 301 00:15:15,600 --> 00:15:18,560 Speaker 2: I started dreaming about who I could be and what 302 00:15:18,680 --> 00:15:21,160 Speaker 2: I could achieve in my life based on the conversations 303 00:15:21,160 --> 00:15:24,360 Speaker 2: you and I had had, and the struggle I was 304 00:15:24,440 --> 00:15:27,360 Speaker 2: having was if I wanted to achieve those things, I 305 00:15:27,400 --> 00:15:31,240 Speaker 2: couldn't see how I could achieve them and have a family. 306 00:15:31,600 --> 00:15:34,760 Speaker 2: They were not congruent where I wanted to go or 307 00:15:34,800 --> 00:15:37,840 Speaker 2: where I thought I wanted to go, and where I 308 00:15:37,960 --> 00:15:41,120 Speaker 2: had committed to go. We caught up one afternoon for 309 00:15:41,160 --> 00:15:45,640 Speaker 2: afternoon tea and I was sharing just how excited I 310 00:15:45,720 --> 00:15:48,000 Speaker 2: was about getting married and all of the things that 311 00:15:48,080 --> 00:15:50,800 Speaker 2: associated with that, And as the conversation continued, I found 312 00:15:50,840 --> 00:15:54,000 Speaker 2: myself sharing with her this newfound confidence that I had. 313 00:15:54,080 --> 00:15:56,080 Speaker 2: She was my teacher, so she knew the person I 314 00:15:56,160 --> 00:15:58,360 Speaker 2: was previous, and so she could see this growth in 315 00:15:58,400 --> 00:16:01,960 Speaker 2: me that had occurred. In a sense because of my 316 00:16:02,040 --> 00:16:05,840 Speaker 2: relationship with you. You had provided me with a belief 317 00:16:07,080 --> 00:16:10,080 Speaker 2: in me that I had never experienced before, and so 318 00:16:10,680 --> 00:16:13,200 Speaker 2: the confidence that I had in what I could do 319 00:16:13,280 --> 00:16:16,280 Speaker 2: with my life like just blew out of the water. 320 00:16:16,760 --> 00:16:18,640 Speaker 2: And so as I was sharing all of these dreams 321 00:16:18,680 --> 00:16:21,680 Speaker 2: and goals and things that I, you know, were aspirations 322 00:16:21,720 --> 00:16:24,000 Speaker 2: that I was thinking about, she looked at me and 323 00:16:24,000 --> 00:16:26,960 Speaker 2: she said, Kylie, why would you ever want to get married? 324 00:16:27,600 --> 00:16:30,000 Speaker 2: She said, look at you. You've got your whole world 325 00:16:30,040 --> 00:16:32,440 Speaker 2: ahead of you. You could be any one of those things. 326 00:16:32,720 --> 00:16:38,040 Speaker 2: Why would you trap yourself in a relationship and minimize 327 00:16:38,320 --> 00:16:41,800 Speaker 2: your capacity? And I just remember walking away from that 328 00:16:41,880 --> 00:16:46,960 Speaker 2: and feeling so deeply saddened by the conversation I had. 329 00:16:47,560 --> 00:16:50,480 Speaker 2: It actually confirmed to me that while all of those 330 00:16:50,520 --> 00:16:54,760 Speaker 2: other places would have given me life experience that I 331 00:16:54,840 --> 00:16:59,880 Speaker 2: will never experience, I would never have experienced the joy 332 00:17:00,280 --> 00:17:03,440 Speaker 2: and the connection and the love and security that I've 333 00:17:03,480 --> 00:17:06,680 Speaker 2: experienced in the life that I have created with you. 334 00:17:06,760 --> 00:17:10,240 Speaker 1: Marriage matters. It may not be a popular thing to 335 00:17:10,280 --> 00:17:12,520 Speaker 1: say the research points in that direction, and certainly our 336 00:17:12,520 --> 00:17:15,040 Speaker 1: experience does, but it's about having a good marriage as well. 337 00:17:15,080 --> 00:17:17,640 Speaker 1: It's about working on it, being committed, and figuring out 338 00:17:17,640 --> 00:17:21,320 Speaker 1: how you can avoid those mistakes that harm marriage the most. 339 00:17:21,440 --> 00:17:23,280 Speaker 1: If you had to cut through the noise. It's not 340 00:17:23,320 --> 00:17:27,399 Speaker 1: just about happily ever after fantasies. It's about real world benefits. 341 00:17:27,720 --> 00:17:31,560 Speaker 1: And the data points to financial security, better outcomes for kids. Look, 342 00:17:31,560 --> 00:17:33,639 Speaker 1: it's not for everyone. I'm actually going to say that 343 00:17:33,680 --> 00:17:35,800 Speaker 1: marriage is not for everyone, and there are good reasons 344 00:17:35,800 --> 00:17:39,040 Speaker 1: for some people to not be married. But marriage isn't 345 00:17:39,080 --> 00:17:41,760 Speaker 1: just about the piece of paper. It's a foundation for 346 00:17:41,800 --> 00:17:44,760 Speaker 1: a life of meaning and joy and purpose and growth. 347 00:17:44,800 --> 00:17:47,000 Speaker 1: So I think we need to champion marriage, especially as 348 00:17:47,000 --> 00:17:49,440 Speaker 1: marriage starts to decline. We've got evidence that it's doing that. 349 00:17:49,640 --> 00:17:51,679 Speaker 1: We need to celebrate its merits and support those who 350 00:17:51,760 --> 00:17:54,760 Speaker 1: choose a marriage path. It's time to prioritize the gold, 351 00:17:54,800 --> 00:17:57,639 Speaker 1: stand and read the rewards. The Happy Families podcast is 352 00:17:57,680 --> 00:17:59,960 Speaker 1: produced by Justin Roland for Bridge Media. For more information 353 00:18:00,080 --> 00:18:02,240 Speaker 1: and about how you can make your family happier and 354 00:18:02,280 --> 00:18:04,960 Speaker 1: your marriage stronger, visit happy families dot com dot a 355 00:18:12,080 --> 00:18:12,479 Speaker 1: m HM