WEBVTT - The Finisher! Michael Bevan looks back on stellar career

0:00:00.000 --> 0:00:03.079
<v Speaker 1>The Unplayable Podcast is proudly presented by Quantus, the official

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>podcast partner and the official airline partner of Cricket Australia.

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Once again this season, Quantus is proud to be flying

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Australia's cricketers as they take on the world. Hello, well,

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:20.279
<v Speaker 1>welcome to The Unplayable Podcast. It's been a big week

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>in cricket. My name is josh Ona Finger, Caine Richardson's

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>here as always and well we've got a couple of

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>domestic finals to look forward to now with the Sheffield

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Shield and the WNCL final set.

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 2>It's coming to the end of the cricket season.

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Mate, it is. We've said for a few weeks it's

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 3>a trophy season. We've had one given out in the

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 3>past week, have winced into our last pod, so yeah,

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 3>that starts to get the flavor of this month going.

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, it's one of those times a year where

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 3>most teams are disappointed and probably happy the seasons are finishing,

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 3>but also for a couple of lucky teams they've got

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 3>something to play for now on this next week. So

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 3>always an exciting time of the year it is.

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>And lots of different states represented as well.

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 2>This season.

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>We had obviously New South Wales and Tasmania in that

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>One Day Cup final which New South Wales one Victoria

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>South Australia and in the Sheffield Shield Final, and New South

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Wales and Queensland in the WNCL finals, so lots to

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>look forward to.

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Will preview those finals as well.

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>We've also got Michael Bevin an interview coming up with

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the great domestic and international cricketer.

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 2>He did it all in the Bevo and he's coming

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 2>up very shortly.

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 3>He did it suits the theme perfectly, Josh. So you

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 3>put in these it's no accident when you put these

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 3>shows together, the quality of guests, you get to supplement

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 3>the topic conversation that we have for the rest of

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 3>the program. But do we want a weekly winner.

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.279
<v Speaker 2>I think we should get into the weekly We should.

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 3>It's one again the category that we're talking about, people

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 3>who win. We're talking about trophies, we're talking about winning.

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 3>So weekly winner, I'm going to give mine to Greg Shippin,

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 3>who's waken up today. As you know, he's no longer

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 3>a coach of New South Wales the Sydney Six's. He's

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 3>waking up probably feeling pretty good, you know, he's a

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 3>free man. He can do whatever he wants today. He

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have to organize a training session or return any

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 3>calls to some guys who maybe have him in picked.

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 3>So end of his well, I assume he's not going

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 3>to coach next season at any I mean he's available.

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 3>But what a career tas he for eleven seasons to

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 3>begin he went to Victoria, his home state. Four Shefford

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Shield titles there, a One Day Cup and four Big

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Bash Old Big Bash titles. With Victoria, he goes to

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 3>the Way. He's the inaugural coach to the Melbourne Stars.

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 3>Unfortunately they've well, no one's managed to win a trophy

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 3>for the Modern Stars fortunately unfortunately. And then the Sydney

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Sixers for eleven seasons, two trophies. He was an IPL coach,

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 3>and then he finishes his career at Cricket New South

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Wales with a One Day Cup over I think it

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 3>was three or four seasons there, So we're talking he's

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 3>well over ten domestic trophies, isn't it for someone of

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 3>that that career? So to him weekly win well deserved.

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 3>You can have a beer tonight and maybe reflect on

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 3>all that success that he's had over the journey, but

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 3>also his tentacles as a coach of you know, the

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 3>people that have grown up playing under him are now

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 3>head coaches themselves. And Andrew McDonald been probably the highest

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 3>profile one of those. So whether or not he continues

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 3>on as a coach, his proteges are now moving up

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.239
<v Speaker 3>through the ranks, aren't they. So his impact on Australian

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 3>cricket will live on.

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>And he went into coaching pretty quickly after his playing

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>career for Tasmania, believe, similar to Adam Bogis actually, so

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe we're seeing a bit of a pattern there. And yeah,

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Shippy was also involved in I think maybe four losing

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Big Bash finals as well, so not far off, you know,

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>having an even wider trophy cabinet there.

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 3>It could have been double almost, which is unheard of.

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, an almost unrivaled coaching career. But as I said,

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 3>his legacy will live on through you know, the Andrew

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 3>McDonald's cam Whites that's been David Hussey has been a

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 3>Big Bash coach over the year, Brad Hodge's coach throughout

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 3>the world as well, so that that powerful Victorian team

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 3>that he was the mastermind of, you know, you're seeing

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 3>that impact of that team and his work kind of

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 3>filtering through international but also sorry domestic, but also international cricket.

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Now, when you were talking about him having to tell

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>players they weren't picked.

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Were you're referring to yourself at the Sydney sixes or.

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 3>No, he didn't need to tell. I actually went to

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 3>him and said, just don't even worry about it. I'll

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 3>just sit over here in the corner and pretend I'm

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 3>not here.

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>It's funny you've gone with shupy few weekly winner because

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>we haven't. We never talked about what each other's weekly

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>winners are because we like an element of surprise. Yes,

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and I've gone with Brad Hadden for this.

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 3>OK.

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Who's going to replace Greg Schifford as New South Wales coach.

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>He's been assistant at Punjab and the Ricky Ponting. It's

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>also did a stint with the sun Rises hydir Bad

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and obviously he captain New South Wales and I think

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>he were in Australia for a couple of games. Lots

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of leadership experience. Now gets his first crack as a

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>head coach. He's going to take over the Blues. No

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>One elsn't been made so far on the Sixers or

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the Thunders of vacancies as well because Trevor Bayless is

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>no longer coach over there at the Thunder.

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.280
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, it's exciting times for New South Wales.

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>A whole stack of new assistant coaches as well coming in,

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>so Haddam's really going to get a chance to make

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>his own mark on this squad.

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, it is great. You don't typically see those bigger

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 3>names that have you know, storied international careers go back

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 3>to domestic coaching. It's normally they're looking for the top jobs,

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 3>aren't they. So to get him back to domestic ranks

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 3>is a great coupe for domestic cricket. I guess you

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 3>know you just said Adam Boges his name before, but

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 3>he's actually one of those guys who's filtering out of

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 3>domestic cricket. Now he'll stay in the Big Bash, but

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 3>won't be around the Shield and the One Day Cup.

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 3>So he grab someone of Brad Hadden and have him

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 3>back around the domestic scenes. Such a big thing for

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 3>New South Wales. So yeah, bit of an unknown how

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 3>will go? It's one of those things I know, I

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 3>know from being a player, your assistant coaches. It looks

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 3>like with the best job in the world, your mates

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 3>with the players, you've got your batters or your bowlers

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 3>that you look after. You don't have to worry about

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 3>selection or any of that. When there's tough calls to

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 3>be made. You can always just be the guy that

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 3>puts your arm around the players. But when you're a

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 3>head coach, all of that responsibility all of a sudden

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 3>comes with you. So I'm sure he's prepared for all

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 3>of those situations, but it is obviously a much more

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 3>stressful job than you know, just been the old bowling coach.

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>You would have played a bit against How didn't I

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>guess through the Big Bash year's end of his career

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>started your career. He always looked like a very fiery

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>individual on the field.

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 2>Is that fair to say?

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Competitive, fiery. I think my first kind of half

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 3>a dozen games dozen games for Australe with him keeping

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 3>as well, and he was a senior member of the team,

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 3>so I remember team meetings vividly. You know, he's input

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 3>in those. In those, you know, I was wow, Yeah,

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 3>like how we would talk about the opposition there, wacknesses

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 3>and stuff just the depth he would go into it,

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 3>so yeah, no doubt he'll bring that to New southwast.

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's get into this chat with Michael Bevin. I

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>was able to get on a call with him. It's

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>during the rain delay, the very long four hour rain

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>delay before the One Day Cup final last week, so

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that's what he's talking about when he's talking about Bludstone

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Arena looking very bleak and rainy. But great to chat

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>with him about the finisher nickname. Lots of amazing finishes

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>in the One Day Cup and Frustralia, but also taking

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a big bag of wickets in a Test match. So

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>here he is, Michael Bevan, the finisher.

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>After last year Henry Thornton won the inallural Michael Bevin

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Medal for the best on ground in the men's final

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of the One Day Cup. We're now joined by the

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>man that the medal is named after, Michael Bevan. Welcome

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to the Unplayable podcast. How's it all going for you

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>down there in Tasmania today.

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, thanks for having me on. Unfortunately the news is

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 4>not that great from down here. It's been a lot

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 4>of rain throughout the course of the day and then

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 4>obviously there needs to get underway very shortly otherwise there'll

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 4>be no play. Although having just said that, like I'm

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 4>looking out at the ground now, obviously got great views

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 4>over belly Vole and they're just sort of pulling the

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 4>stakes out now and it's very light. So yeah, look,

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 4>there is an outside chance that there'll be a game

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 4>on tonight if there's no further rain from this point

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 4>in time.

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Fingers crossed.

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Now the One Day Cup Final, it's a game that

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you had a lot of success in over the years.

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Nine finals you played in, five wins and five hundred

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and something runs. Are there any particular finals that stand

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>out when you cast your mind back to all those

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>matches that you played in.

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, look, I didn't even I didn't even realize I've

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 4>been in that many finals, to be fair, which is

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 4>nice to know or recall, So thanks for that. But yeah, look,

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 4>the two that probably stand out for me, I think

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:09.839
<v Speaker 4>there was It was one of the earlier finals that

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 4>I was in against Victoria. I'm pretty sure Dean Jones

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 4>was around, Baron Berry was keeping.

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 5>Flemma was bowling. He was also in the team, and.

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 4>Like back then in the One Day competition, there wasn't

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 4>a lot of not a lot of people turned up

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 4>and on this particular occasion, I think we've got about

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:32.199
<v Speaker 4>twelve thousand to the seg for the one day Fine.

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 4>So it was played in front of a such a

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 4>really nice atmosphere and.

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 5>It went down to the wire and so too close.

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 5>Too close.

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 4>Again, I tended to play that way and on this

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 4>particular occasion, yeah, I think we got home in the

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 4>last over or something like that. It was a pretty

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 4>low scoring match and a difficult wicket.

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 5>And then there was a there was a one day

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 5>final against.

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 4>Wa over and Earth in early two thousands or something

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 4>like that. Yeah, look to WA we batted you know,

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 4>I think we batted second, and you know, there was

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 4>we were chasing a big score and I ended up

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 4>scoring one hundred.

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 5>But I remember there was a little bit.

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 4>Of pressure on prior to the match, a lot of

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 4>talk that they were going to target me, and so

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 4>to get a big score in a you know, particularly

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 4>over and perch, which is always a little bit tricky

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 4>to play. That was another good memory in terms of

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 4>terms of the one day one day final for me,

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 4>those two matches probably stand out.

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Well, I'm glad to mention those because I had

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a look at both of those before we came on,

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.079
<v Speaker 1>and that one against Victoria, you're only twenty two years old.

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Have you scored sixty four not out in that low

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in that small chase, as you said, pretty good Victorian

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>attack there as well. James Sutherland, Tony Dotamaide, Simon O'Donnell,

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 1>and Damian Fleming Bold that last over, he touched on,

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>do you feel like this innings was a bit of

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 1>a maybe a seminal moment for you, a coming of

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>age as such, or sort of made you establish yourself

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>on the national stage.

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 5>I guess.

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 4>So. I mean, you know, you always break it up

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 4>into one day game and you know the four day game,

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 4>and you know, so i'd sort of announced or arrived

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 4>earlier than that for the longer version, you know, and.

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 5>From my perspective at least from the one day game.

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 4>In tight games, I'd always really had the ability, I think,

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 4>to take it down to the wire. And so look,

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 4>it might have been for other people or people that

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 4>were watching it, but not necessarily for me, I guess.

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, I think that's sort of coincide twenty two

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 4>that sort of coincided with a good run I would

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 4>have had in twenty twenty one maybe for New South Wales,

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 4>and so yeah, I guess it's just those steaks on

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 4>top of stakes and as you're establishing yourself as a

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 4>player and obviously game for slightly higher on us. So yeah,

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 4>it was obviously a pretty important match from that perspective.

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 2>And you said that you generally tended to take it late.

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Was that a deliberate tactic by you to take it

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 2>to the last over of the match? We always hear

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 2>in cricket these days about batting deep and taking it deep.

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Was that sort of your philosophy as well in those

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 2>high pressure run chases.

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think so.

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 4>I think one of the reasons for that was because

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 4>I like to minimize risk and make sure and just

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 4>have certain bowlers to target. And when you sort of

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 4>have plans and you have certain bowlers to take it,

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 4>you can't really.

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 5>Determine when they're going to.

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 4>Come on, if that makes sense, And so quite often

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 4>those bowlers that you end up targeting, you know, can

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.959
<v Speaker 4>quite quite often be towards the end of the innings,

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, because there's always that sort of match up

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 4>between strengths and weaknesses and trying to find bowlers that

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 4>make it difficult to score, et cetera, et cetera. So yeah, look,

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 4>it always ended up being that way. But I wouldn't

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 4>say that I went out with a view to taking

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 4>it deep. You know, It's just it's sort of presented

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 4>or played out that way, and it seemed natural, normal,

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 4>And yeah, it seemed like the appropriate sort of strategy

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.199
<v Speaker 4>in most circumstances.

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>And then you're obviously given the tagline the Finisher. I'm

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>not sure if you like that tag or you dislike

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that tag, but it certainly stuck. And do you remember

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>when it first did stick and when that sort of

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>name came about.

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:52.079
<v Speaker 4>Look, it must have been late late nineties, maybe early

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 4>two thousands. I think it came from the Indian cricket public,

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 4>I think, or maybe the media in India. So yeah, look,

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean obviously I liked it. I created a sort

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 4>of a unique role there, and again it was just

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 4>natural to me. I didn't go out to create the role,

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 4>but it just happened and I found my spot, and so.

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 5>Like, it was good.

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 4>It was nice to know that that, you know, I

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 4>created something worthy of a tag or something different at least.

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 4>But then you know, I look like, if I'm being

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 4>really brutally honest, I would say the last couple of

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 4>years of my career, you know, it also became a

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 4>bit of a burden to bear in the sense that

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, there's always that pressure to finish the match

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 4>and get a result, I guess.

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 5>So, yeah, it was.

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 4>It was nice, but it came with it with it's yeah,

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 4>the you know, a few tricky.

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Moments well just on pressure, because I mean watching back

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the highlights now these days, it never looked like you

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>were under the pump or lost your call in any stage.

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Was that just what it looked like from the exterior.

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>What was actually going on inside? Were you feeling the

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>heat or were you someone who was when you're in

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the moment very cool and calm?

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, look mostly calm until you know, everyone has their

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 4>pressure points in terms of run rates. So for me,

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, it was probably six and over to go

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 4>with fifteen, it was probably seven and runs it over

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 4>to go with five to ten, And so as soon

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 4>as it got to that stage, yeah, I started to think, right, well, okay,

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 4>so it's now.

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 5>Do or die. You've got to bring it down.

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 4>And so I always had those sort of levels in

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 4>terms of pressure on the match, like I was either

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 4>called in when the team was deep in trouble or

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 4>I didn't get a bat, And so when the team's

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 4>actually in trouble, like most people are expecting you to

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 4>lose the match, there's no real pressure.

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 5>You don't put a lot of pressure on.

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 4>Yourself because it is a really tricky situation and difficult,

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 4>and so quite often I find that I'd go out

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 4>into the middle and you know, you know, when we

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 4>were struggling and there was no pressure, or at least

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 4>I didn't put any pressure on myself, then you know,

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 4>you take it a bit deeper, and then I think,

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, when you were a chance of winning the

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 4>match was when I started to get a bit nervous again,

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 4>or the nerves would start to creep up again because

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 4>you had something to lose.

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 5>And so for me, it's sort of ebbed and flowed.

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 4>It went from no pressure to okay, we can win

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 4>now a little bit of pressure, and then the last

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 4>couple of overs are right on dial in on what

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 4>I have to do to win the match here, and

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 4>so you go back to then focusing on you know

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 4>what it is you have to do, so a bit

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 4>a bit of everything at times.

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 2>That's fascinating.

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, as you touched on you did certainly cove out

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a niche for yourself. But were there any players that

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you did sort of model your game on as you

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>were coming through the ranks?

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 5>Not not really.

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean like I'm down here, you know, for the

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:20.120
<v Speaker 4>Dean Jones Cup to present the Michael Bevan Medal and

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 4>you know the guy that you know, I you know,

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 4>I guess I thought extremely highly of him one day.

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 4>Cricket was Dean Jones at the time in terms of

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 4>the way he played, and you know, he was probably

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 4>the first Australian player I know was he was at

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 4>least one of them too, to change the way it

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 4>had been played and to put the pressure back on

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 4>the ball. But of course he did it from you

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 4>number batting at number three, and so so look.

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:55.719
<v Speaker 5>I've got to be honest, I didn't.

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 4>My role wasn't around when I began my career, Like

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 4>no one had played that, and I sort of carved

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 4>that out and made it my own and it was different,

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 4>it was unique, but it was natural to me. So

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 4>I didn't plan on it or I didn't watch other

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.239
<v Speaker 4>people thinking right, well, you know, if I played this

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 4>way or I do this way, then I'll get a

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 4>good result. It was just, you know, it was sort

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 4>of analysis, it was feel. It was a combination of, look,

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 4>I know what I can do, and you know, in

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 4>the past one day cricket, batting at the back end

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 4>was a bit of a slog fest, you know, and

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 4>it was viewed as that, whereas I was a little

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 4>bit more calculating and clinical about it.

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 5>And that was just really to do with my personality.

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 4>And the other thing that I would also say is

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 4>that I got fortunate in the sense that I it

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 4>was the role felt natural to me. I felt a

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 4>level of responsibility as well. And so when you're in cricket,

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, when you're looking for batsman and finding where

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 4>they that best, it sort of has to be authentic

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 4>andtrinsic to.

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 5>How they feel about the role.

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 4>And so for me, playing that role felt completely comfortable

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 4>knowing that you know, I could win, Like you know,

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 4>I was at the pointy end of winning or losing

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 4>a match, but of course, you know, all throughout the.

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 5>Match, every player had that same opportunity.

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 4>It was just because of that snapshot and moment in

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 4>time where it fell down to me. But yeah, so no,

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 4>I didn't really, I didn't really have anyone. Of course,

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 4>I had heroes and guys I admire, but no one

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 4>for that specific role.

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 5>If that makes sense.

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it does, it does.

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>And as you said, you're coming to us from Valery Voval,

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>where you enjoyed some success of your own, certainly in

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.679
<v Speaker 1>the latter part of your career. Looking back at that

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and four season when you made the move south,

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean the runs just flowed in all formats, eight

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>cent in the Shield and plenty of runs in the

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>One Day Cup. Why do you think it clicked for

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 1>you when you made the move south?

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 4>You know, I thought it was time for a change,

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 4>and with that a change of approach in terms of playing.

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 4>And I think at that point in time, I kind

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 4>of realized, you know, my Australian career was done and dusted,

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 4>even though I had overtures to try and make those

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and seven World Cup, I think, and I

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 4>was still probably playing well enough to make it, but

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 4>Australia had such a good team by then that it

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 4>was tough to get back in. So I think one

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 4>of the things that you do do is reflect on

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 4>your career in terms of what you've achieved, what haven't

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 4>you achieved? You know?

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 5>And you know, is there anything that I could have

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 5>done differently?

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 4>It probably would have helped if I had have thought

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 4>about those things throughout my career more often, and I

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 4>did earlier. But for me, it was at that point

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 4>in time I thought, Okay, well, how would I play

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 4>now I'm probably not aim to play for.

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 5>Australia, Or how would I play you know, without fear?

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 4>Or you know, what haven't I on in terms of

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 4>my approach that I can implement when I now I'm

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 4>down in Tasmania. And so I sort of did all

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 4>those things, and I had a sort of a lot

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 4>of mental queues and things that I that I wanted

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 4>to implement and insert into my game. And for that

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 4>first year it just sort of really really worked. It

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 4>wasn't really a lot about the cricket side of things.

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 4>That was more just me allowing myself to let go,

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 4>to let my reactions take over, probably to be a

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 4>little bit more confident and carefree that I'd been in

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 4>my previous parts of my career. And so yeah, when

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 4>it all added up, I sort of got it right.

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 4>And yeah, there were certain reasons why it really worked

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 4>and it was a really enjoyable season of course, and

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 4>then it was the one day comp.

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 5>You know, which was which was very satisfying as well.

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think what's Tassi's first winning thirty something years

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and you obviously integral helped orchestrate that saw that the

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Tasmanian community to get around the Herbert Hurricanes last year.

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Was it a similar sort of vibe when the draught

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>was broken for the Tigers?

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 4>Look, it's hard to say, because I'd come from a

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 4>sort of a large state with you know, quite a

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 4>lot of trophies in the cabinet and a kind of

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 4>a slightly different attitude and you know, and so you know,

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 4>I was Canbra born and based cricketer to begin with

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 4>at the start of my career, and you know, there

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 4>was a touch of Canberra about Tasmania in terms of

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 4>just the minnows.

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 5>And the smaller and you know, always having to fight

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 5>and core to.

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 4>Win matches and let alone competitions, and so you know,

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 4>it was it was really interesting for me that first

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 4>season in terms of the headspace everyone was at and

0:22:58.480 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 4>how they played their cricket.

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 5>You know, I'm not so sure from a like.

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 4>A you know, a fan perspective or an administrative perspective,

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 4>but a player perspective. It was really interesting to see,

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, some of the changes that happened during that

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.360
<v Speaker 4>time and obviously being a part of that as well.

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 4>So it was it was like it was an enjoyable,

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 4>interesting season for me.

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>It would be remiss with me if I didn't ask

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you about some of your exploits for Australia as well.

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course, everybody loves to rewatch and talk about that

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>New Year's Day innings. Is that the highlight of your

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 1>career or are there other particular knocks or innings that

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of surpassed that.

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 5>Perhaps, Look, it's one of them.

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 4>That was what I was known for, you know, and

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 4>it sort of brought me to the to the one

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 4>day stage and the one day team, and so I

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 4>always always cherish and remember what that meant in terms

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 4>of pound for pound, in terms of the quality of

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:01.640
<v Speaker 4>the innings.

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 5>Probably wasn't my favorite innings, you know.

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 4>I can think of a couple of innings that were,

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, more important to me. There was a match

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 4>in Melbourne early in two thousand, I think we were

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 4>against New Zealand. I ended up scoring one hundred of

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 4>one hundred balls, and we needed to win that match

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 4>to make the final, and we'd never.

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 5>Not made the final for such a lot for maybe ever,

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 5>and and.

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 4>We were I don't know, I look on you know, honestly,

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:34.360
<v Speaker 4>I can't even remember what we were when we were six.

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 2>For Oh I've looked at up Michael six for eighty two,

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 2>chasing two forty six to.

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 5>Forty six, so exactly.

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 4>And so that was that was a favorite because there

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 4>were a lot of runs to score, not many wickets down,

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 4>and it was a pressure situation. So that was probably

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 4>one of my favorites. And I also sort of recall

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 4>walking off that game and coming through the stands and

0:24:57.640 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 4>you know, just sort of seeing the sort of the

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 4>my teammates faces in terms of what I'd helped, you know, achieve.

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 4>You know, it sort of resonated really strongly and made

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.120
<v Speaker 4>me feel pretty pretty good inside, you know. And there

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 4>was a there was a well, there was a there

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 4>was a series in South Africa where again they scored

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 4>close to three hundred or two ninety, and that they

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 4>were big scores back then and not you know, and

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 4>again we lost a couple of early wickets.

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 5>But they had a good attack and again from memory.

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 4>I got one hundred off one hundred and helped manufacture

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 4>a win you know there and then you know, obviously

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 4>the West Indies ninety ninety six West Indies quarter final

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 4>semi final against the West Indies were four point fifteen

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 4>and it was just survival. So I had quite a Yeah,

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 4>so I had quite quite quite a number of games

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.679
<v Speaker 4>that I thought, well, you know, there's probably more pressure on,

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 4>you know than the last last ball.

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 5>Win in Sydney News Day.

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 4>So but it's like it's top five, Yes, but I

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 4>reckon there's three or four innings that I probably probably

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 4>think more highly off he.

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.880
<v Speaker 1>And I guess there was also that World Cup match

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:12.919
<v Speaker 1>against England in Port Elizabeth. You and Andy Bickle again

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>combined to get Australia over the line and again another

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 1>high stakes match.

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I just relied on Andy. Really. He was. He

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 5>was the man.

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 4>He was a he was a great sort of you know,

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 4>bowling all around it to have at decrease, he was Yeah,

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 4>he had nerves as steel, high levels of confidence.

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 5>And you know, I guess one of my one of

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 5>the parts to.

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 4>My role is batting with lower and just kind of

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 4>get understanding and getting a feel for what they're capable of,

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 4>how to approach them, and you know, and yeah, and

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 4>he was definitely one of those guys who just let

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 4>him roll and roll with it because he thrived and

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 4>there was nothing I was going to say that that

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 4>would would help him switch on or or believe that

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 4>he wasn't going to win the match.

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 5>And so, yeah, yeah, that was a great series.

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, we performed really well, and we had a couple

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 4>of tough, difficult matches on that wicket where it was

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 4>just popping and bouncing and it was hard to get

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:21.919
<v Speaker 4>the spinners away, and you know, so there was a

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 4>couple of from memory like that two thousand and three

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 4>World Cup with minus warning, but we'd sort of progressed

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 4>as a team there that we were just kind of

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 4>good enough that no one really worried that warning was missing,

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 4>and we didn't really ever feel that we weren't going

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 4>to win the World Cup, even though, as you said,

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 4>there was a couple of tricky matches in Port Elizabeth,

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:49.239
<v Speaker 4>it could have gone either way, so that they were

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 4>pretty fond memories. And also then there was I mean,

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 4>I think the favorite tournament for me was the ninety

0:27:56.040 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 4>nine World Cup, just quite simply because we we hadn't

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 4>really become a one day powerhouse by then, we just started.

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 5>That was the beginning of it, and.

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 4>We were kind of faced with because of a poor

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 4>start and the way that I think it was the

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 4>super sixth tournament from a memory that they had to

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, we lost a couple of early ones, and

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 4>then we had to we had to win seven in

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 4>a row. And at that point in time, I'd only

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 4>ever played in an Australia one Day team that won

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 4>three matches in a row, So to win seven in

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 4>a row in a World Cup was quite amazing feeling.

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 4>And I think the real the great thing about that,

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 4>at least from my perspective, so we just had someone

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 4>in every game that just stood up and just had

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 4>a match winning performance when they really needed it. And

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, like in most teams you have sort of

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 4>three or four match winners, whereas you know, just about

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 4>we had six or seven guys throughout the course, seven

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 4>guys throughout the course of those seven matches that stood

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 4>up and turned the match on its head whenever we

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 4>were struggling. So that that was probably probably my favorite

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 4>memory of my One day career in terms of the team,

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 4>team aspect and the team performance.

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I just love those photos of the team on the

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Lord's balcony after that win over Pakistan in the bright

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>yellow kit. I mean, it doesn't get much more iconic

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>than that.

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't reckon, No, it was crazy, and you know,

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 4>and I think the from memory the final is a

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 4>bit of a letdown. And look, I think and I

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 4>know it doesn't happen nowadays because it's a global competition

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 4>and everyone gets planned different wickets, et cetera, et cetera.

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 4>But back then, you know, I had the same feeling,

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 4>the same feeling in the finals because I think we

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 4>played Pakistan ninety nine, we played India in the two

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 4>thousand and three and both wickets had a bit of

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 4>carry and bounce, and at that point in time, you know,

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 4>most of the cricket that the Indians and the Pakistani's

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 4>played were on on wickets, so so you know, you

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 4>sort of you're always peeping an eye on the first

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 4>over with clean McGrath bowling and seeing how much pace

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 4>and bounces in the wicket, and you know, through the

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 4>course of the first couple of of those matches, even

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 4>though they were World Cup finals.

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 5>I felt that we you know, we had a.

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 4>Very the condition suited us and so we had a

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 4>very good chance of winning both of those.

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Really, that's great.

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Where do you keep the World Cup medals? Are they

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>on display somewhere in your house?

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 4>Or yeah, in my lounde in my lounde room. And

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 4>which is which is like, it's it's it's difficult. It

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 4>was only have a small, well not a small unit,

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 4>but I have a unit. So I've got a sort

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 4>of put all the Michael Bevan fanboys stuff up in

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 4>the shirts or plastered across all the bedrooms and the

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 4>lounge rooms, and so, you know, I didn't have those

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 4>up for quite a while. It's only reasonably recently where

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 4>I've actually just started to really well, I sort of

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 4>reconnect with what I what I did in my career,

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 4>and you know, and to to revisit the memories more often.

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 4>And I had quite a lot of memorabilia, and I

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 4>got rid of kind of half of that to local

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 4>cricket teams and stuff like that. Still keep quite a bit,

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 4>probably I don't even know what I'm going to do

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 4>with it.

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 5>I've got a little bit, but you know.

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 4>Some of it's some of it's in the wardrobe and

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 4>some of it's out on the you know you out

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 4>about in the living areas and stuff like that.

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 2>That's brilliant. Absolutely, the more of it the better.

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Now, just before I let you go, Michael, last week,

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>rich Ol and I sort of asked our listeners who

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:43.719
<v Speaker 1>are the best part time bowlers? And your name came

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 1>up from our listeners quite a bit. Do you reckon

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you were under bold through your career or will you

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>bowl the right amount with your left arm wriskin?

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 4>Probably at times both over bold and under.

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 5>Bold, depending on how I was bowling.

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 4>It was a crazy situation bowling eyes. There was a

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 4>period there where I had obviously more from a part

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 4>timer into a probably nearly a regular bowler from memory,

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 4>and was picked as a regular bowler in front of

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 4>Paul Rifle, I believe on a green top in Port Elizabeth,

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 4>and and so look, there were I didn't enjoy bowling,

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 4>like I didn't have any confidence in in my bowlinging

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 4>the ball, which is kind of crazy that you can

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 4>get picked for playing a Test match as a bowler

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 4>and still not really be one hundred percent sure where

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 4>you're going to land. Them, and so there was a

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 4>little bit of trepidation and nervouness nurse around that role,

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 4>and also some some.

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 5>Irritation given that I was.

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 4>Meant to be a batsman and I hadn't really truly

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 4>cracked it Test team as a batsman, but my bowling

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 4>I took ten for an adelaide I think before I

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 4>scored a Test century, which obviously never eventuated. But so yeah, internally,

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 4>like you know, I was a little bit unsure at

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 4>times of bowl really well, and then I think it

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 4>sort of all came crashing down, Like I think I

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 4>was probably a genuine all rounder there for a while,

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 4>but it all came crashing down in the ashes in

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 4>ninety seven, I think, where my batting struggled and the

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 4>wickets were really.

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 5>Slow and I really relied on.

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 4>A bit of pop, a bit of bounce and I

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 4>was overspinning with the wrong and you know, I kind

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 4>of found that, you know, it was difficult to get

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 4>as much traction in England and back in Australia or

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 4>South Africa where I had success as a bowl or so, yeah, a.

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 5>Lot of up and down.

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 4>Series with my bowling and a bit hit and miss

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 4>at times, but yeah, certainly when I was bowling, well

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 4>they were they you know, I did a pretty good job.

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, you got to take us back to Adelaide that

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:08.839
<v Speaker 1>ten week at Hold. Not many people could say they've

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 1>got a ten week at Haul in Test cricket. What

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>happened that day?

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:16.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well I actually landed them. And a really good

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 4>sign when you're bowling is you know, is when you

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 4>bowl you're wrong, and which is probably my major you know,

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:28.439
<v Speaker 4>my major delivery, Like if guys can't pick my wrong

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 4>and I know I'm a big chance because.

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 5>You can get a you can get.

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:36.319
<v Speaker 4>Away with bowling tripe and you'll get wickets because you know,

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 4>if if you pitch it a little bit short or

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 4>a little bit fuller, they actually can't, you know, they're

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:42.839
<v Speaker 4>unsure of whether it's a wrong.

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.879
<v Speaker 5>And I probably had about to rollin spur Over and I.

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 4>Just think the West Indies, look, they got me on

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 4>it on a day and in a Test where I

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 4>actually landed them pretty well, and they weren't look they

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:00.840
<v Speaker 4>were they were, they didn't really pick it like I

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 4>think Glara picked my wrong and and so he had

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 4>an easier time against me than some of the other batsmen.

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 5>Some of the right handers, you know, and again.

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 4>They were all right handers and so the wrong and

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 4>became you know, a tough a tough delivery when I

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 4>landed it away to the slips. So yeah, like I was,

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, that was a good you know, I'd just

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 4>come back into the the Test arena and you know

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.919
<v Speaker 4>at the time I happened to be batting well as well.

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 5>So it's kind of like when I was batting.

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Well the you know, there's a bit of confidence here

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 4>with the ball as well, and particularly when teams didn't

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:41.720
<v Speaker 4>pick my wrong, in which South Africa didn't, West Indies didn't,

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 4>England didn't either, but because the wicket was so slow,

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 4>they could adjust and so look I always did better

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 4>as a as a as a bowler when they couldn't

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 4>pick my wrong for sure.

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 2>And look I'm just looking at the scorecard now you've

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 2>got Shane Warn bowling at the other end as well,

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 2>So bowling in Tandebeth Warning, I mean, what a dream

0:35:57.360 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 2>that is.

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I remember times in South Africa and obviously the

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 4>West Indies as well, and of course it does make

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:10.359
<v Speaker 4>it you know, you have to give cutos to your teammates. Well,

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 4>I do you know, because they were just so good

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 4>in creating pressure, both defensive and offensive pressure.

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 5>You know, guys like.

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 4>Warning, the Glenn Dizzy, you know, all those guys they

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 4>were you know, they were world class bowlers and and

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 4>so you know, they're always they're always going to create

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 4>pressure and wickets from the other end as well. So

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 4>I really, you know, if I landed them anywhere near

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 4>where are good, good areas, then you know wickets were

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:45.760
<v Speaker 4>going to follow.

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Excellent Michael, Well, thanks for your time and thanks for

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 1>running us through some of the highlights of your great career.

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations on the Michael Bevan Award as well.

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 5>Yes, thanks you just so much appreciated.

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 1>The finisher Richo one of the great nicknames as well,

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:07.240
<v Speaker 1>not just great player with great nickname, and maybe that'll

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 1>have to be a top four for future episodes as

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the best nicknames. But when it came to chasing in

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:17.919
<v Speaker 1>one day cricket domestic, whether international or for New South

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Wales of for Tasmania, there was none better than Michael Bevan.

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, he's the pioneer, wasn't he of as he talks

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 3>about in that chat, But he was kind of the

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 3>first to be tagged with that nickname, and there's been

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 3>a few that have been you know, it's been bear

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:34.839
<v Speaker 3>need around since. But there's only one. Really, there's only

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 3>one finisher, isn't there. But we've seen kind of ms

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 3>DONI take on that that role I guess for India

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 3>for so long and making an identity for himself. And

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:46.320
<v Speaker 3>then obviously James Faulkner was the modern day version of

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Michael Bevan. But the I think when you look at

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 3>his stats and the longevity and no matter who he

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 3>played for, you know, he played for three states and Australia,

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:57.800
<v Speaker 3>he did it. He played that same role for everyone

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:00.360
<v Speaker 3>and if he was batting at three or four in

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 3>domestic cricket, he still he'd still be not out at

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 3>the end of the innings, or if he'd bat at

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 3>six for austral Obviously it was somehow a lot easier

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 3>for him to make that mark. But it's also that

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 3>is now filled into the way you know, t twenty teams,

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:17.359
<v Speaker 3>one day teams are built now players in that role

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:19.279
<v Speaker 3>to finish in innings. It's such a big part of

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:22.360
<v Speaker 3>the batting order, whereas I'm sure back in the nineties

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 3>and early two thousands you're probably just picking your best

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 3>six batsman that you can fit in the six and

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 3>then just kind of working it out whereas guys have

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 3>a role. You know, Tim David was playing that for

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:34.760
<v Speaker 3>so long in T twenty cricket. So he's a pioneer

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 3>and he probably deserves a lot more. You know, you

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:39.800
<v Speaker 3>don't hear his name as much when One day crickets

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:42.319
<v Speaker 3>spoken about, but he's such a pioneer and set up

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 3>that role for people to enjoy now. And yeah, I

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:47.279
<v Speaker 3>was just looking at his one day stats before and

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 3>he touches on the nine finals, which in itself is

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 3>crazy to play. I mean nine seasons to make finals,

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 3>win five of them. But he also made over three

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 3>thousand runs and averages sixty one. I did seventy eight times,

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 3>and twenty five of those times he didn't get out,

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:07.880
<v Speaker 3>which is just under one in three. So if anyone

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 3>going around who played against him back then, who actually

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 3>got him out, well done to you.

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 2>Well that's a good point.

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and there's probably a couple of runouts in there,

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 3>so they're pretty rare. The old Michael Bevan dismissals, So

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:19.320
<v Speaker 3>what a player.

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 1>And so there his domestic cricket numbers, I think in

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the average mid fifties hit and oak as well, so.

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 3>He actually dipped a bit warmly played for Australia, but

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 3>again incredible like to average that over a long period

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:35.919
<v Speaker 3>of time. And I remember watching him as a kid.

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 3>He was my favorite player. I actually had a pet

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 3>bird and I named it Bevan really fun fact, so

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 3>there you go. He was. He was like, and I

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 3>wanted the Milli Champion Hall or a Puma that he

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 3>used to use classic. I think they're making a comeback

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 3>by the way. Yeah, big big fan of Bevans type

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:58.440
<v Speaker 3>of bird, budgy like in the Green and Gold as well. Man,

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 3>it was a green and gold bird, so there he goes.

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 3>So I wasn't as clued into his domestic feats back then.

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 3>I was more watching his Australian stuff, but I was

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 3>a big Bevin fan. Yeah, Bevo, I don't know what

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 3>to do with that information.

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:13.879
<v Speaker 2>I've lost my train of thought.

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:18.319
<v Speaker 3>But there's a future Big Four as well, well, which

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 3>is pet names. You know, we're running out of content here.

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 3>I'll leave the Big Four to.

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>You, okay, Yeah, I'll take care of today's that's for sure.

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 1>And then it was nice that we also got to

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 1>ask him about some of those less listener questions or

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>listener responses about him being under bold, and he made

0:40:37.000 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 1>a good point while I've taken a ten wick at

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Halle in a Test match, so I wasn't necessarily under bold.

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:44.480
<v Speaker 1>And we've managed to dig out some of those wickets

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 1>as well from the archives, so stay tuned for those

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 1>as well. But thanks to Michael Bevan for giving us

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:54.279
<v Speaker 1>his time and having that chat with us. Let's talk

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:56.880
<v Speaker 1>about the sheffid Shield Final which is now locked in.

0:40:56.960 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be Victoria and you're old mob South

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Australia taking it taking it to each other for five

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 1>days at the Junction Oval for March twenty six. The

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Sacker Now they've been in the competition since eighteen ninety two,

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>rich oh, they've never managed to go back to back

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and back in the late eighteen hundreds it was only

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.759
<v Speaker 1>a three team competition, so you've got a good opportunity.

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:22.840
<v Speaker 1>They never managed to do it then could they do

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>it now? Brendan Doggett is a touch and go for

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that final. He would be a huge inclusion if they

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:30.279
<v Speaker 1>can bring him in. But they've got plenty of pace

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 1>yep as well, don't they? The Sackers and so to

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Victoria and maybe that's been a bit of a theme

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of this season. Most of the topic could takers have

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:39.720
<v Speaker 1>been quicks as has been the case for the last

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:42.840
<v Speaker 1>few years, and the two sides got to have a

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:44.520
<v Speaker 1>bit of a look at each other this week as well,

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 1>playing out a bit of a tame draw with a

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:50.800
<v Speaker 1>bit of weather around in yeah, Melbourne, so hopefully hopefully

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 1>some clear skies for that final when the week comes around.

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was a bit of an odd one knowing

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:59.479
<v Speaker 3>that the possible scenario is going to pit two teams

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 3>against each other again at the same venue a few

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 3>weeks later. So once that Queenslane kind of ran out

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 3>of the opportunity of that game. I mean, the spice

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:10.400
<v Speaker 3>was taken out of it, and everyone's looking forward to

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:12.400
<v Speaker 3>the final when they so you say they got to

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 3>look at it, look at it, Chada, I'd probably say

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 3>they didn't show much of Yeah. Wow, I mean in

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 3>saying that everyone knows exactly what everyone does down to

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 3>a te so but yeah, definitely fizzled out and everyone's

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 3>probably preserving themselves for the big dance now. So but

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:31.359
<v Speaker 3>in saying that, Brendan Hugget hasn't played or didn't play

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 3>in that game and it hasn't played for a while.

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:34.240
<v Speaker 3>So to get him back a bit of a Shield

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 3>final specialist, which we've said, so that'll be a huge

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 3>inclusion for South Australia and just to get themselves back

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:45.880
<v Speaker 3>into the opportunity to defend their shield is a pretty

0:42:45.880 --> 0:42:48.879
<v Speaker 3>good achievement because they weren't looking likely kind of at

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 3>the big Bash break. They've they've turned it around really well.

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:54.319
<v Speaker 3>And again, as you said, it's all been on the

0:42:54.320 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 3>back of well as the same for victory, but the

0:42:57.000 --> 0:43:00.319
<v Speaker 3>bowling attacks have been outstanding and they have been for

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 3>a period of time now for South Australia, especially with McAndrew.

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:06.839
<v Speaker 3>You know, you've got a range of ballers there, but

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:10.000
<v Speaker 3>the core that's kept them together over this last couple

0:43:10.040 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 3>of years and even going back a bit further is

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 3>a big part of their success. But also getting Alex

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 3>carry back from the Ashes and chucking him into that

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:21.279
<v Speaker 3>middle order as they did last year in their Shield win.

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I think they'll be quietly confident. I know

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 3>it's hard winning away, but with the new rules with

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 3>the Shield and not being able to just be a

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 3>boring draw, it's going to bring them into the game.

0:43:31.719 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Ok yeah, okay, And so as Jake Cleman said, they've

0:43:35.760 --> 0:43:37.440
<v Speaker 1>they lost their first two games of this season in

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:39.719
<v Speaker 1>South Australia, but since then they haven't actually lost, so

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:42.880
<v Speaker 1>giving them a chance or Victoria have been so dominant

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 1>this season, so obviously deserve to go in favorites. But

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>can you see world where South Astralia do upset the Victorians.

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:52.120
<v Speaker 3>I think you can with just the way the pitchers

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 3>have made these days. And again you can't really just

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 3>produce a boring It's going to be a good wick here.

0:43:56.719 --> 0:43:57.880
<v Speaker 3>It's not as if they're going to make it a

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 3>typical green seema. But I think over the course of

0:44:02.000 --> 0:44:04.760
<v Speaker 3>five days there will be in an opportunity for South Australia.

0:44:05.040 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, there'll be an opportunity of the game for

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:08.759
<v Speaker 3>them to be able to take and get in a

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:11.239
<v Speaker 3>strong position. We saw that with Queensland even last year.

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:13.799
<v Speaker 3>It is hard winning away in a five day game,

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 3>but there's always an opportunity at some point to take

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:19.800
<v Speaker 3>that and be in the game. So that will confront

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 3>them at some point. But it is hard, it's definitely hard.

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:26.320
<v Speaker 3>And Victoria I've had a dominant season. They're basically guaranteed

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:28.879
<v Speaker 3>of being in the Shill Final back at the Big Bash,

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:31.759
<v Speaker 3>like it felt that way anyway, so they're definitely going

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 3>to be confident. But yeah, I dare say there's a

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:38.799
<v Speaker 3>good opportunity that South Australia can I don't know, I

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:41.160
<v Speaker 3>don't know how you would say it, but there'll be

0:44:41.160 --> 0:44:43.239
<v Speaker 3>an opportunity for them to win the game or at

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:45.359
<v Speaker 3>least get themselves in their position to win the game.

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:47.680
<v Speaker 3>It's just whether or not they can they can really

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:51.560
<v Speaker 3>capitalize on it. So again, it's great to see that

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 3>finals now are the way they are and it's not

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:56.840
<v Speaker 3>just going to be the old you know, nine hundred

0:44:57.440 --> 0:44:59.760
<v Speaker 3>You remember that gomes back in the early two thousand,

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:02.120
<v Speaker 3>which in himself, I mean, you wouldn't want to watch

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:04.440
<v Speaker 3>the live stream, no, but it'd be great to check

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 3>the scores and be like, wow, they're on seven hundred

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 3>four down they just lost their fourth like that in

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:11.840
<v Speaker 3>itself was because that takes some skill. But it is

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:14.160
<v Speaker 3>nice to see games that are games and people trying

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:14.399
<v Speaker 3>to win.

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Definitely, Yeah, it's a bit fascicle though when you get

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:18.719
<v Speaker 1>to five for nine hundred.

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Isn't it It is a little bit, but then you

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:22.920
<v Speaker 3>get part times bowling and as we've spoken about last

0:45:22.960 --> 0:45:27.239
<v Speaker 3>couple week, cricket lovers, we do love watching people who

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 3>don't usually bowl get an opportunity.

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Now Victoria, they will obviously have their captain Will Sutherland,

0:45:33.760 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and they'll have Scott Bowland, who's been on fire in

0:45:36.520 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 1>this competition. But then they've got to work out who

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>else fits into their bowling attack. They've had Sam Elliott

0:45:41.680 --> 0:45:43.919
<v Speaker 1>who's been taking which it's for fun this season. Mitch

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Perry has got a couple of five fers. Fergus O'Neill

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:49.880
<v Speaker 1>has an incredible chef which you're bowling average. Todd Murphy

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 1>he's a pretty handy off spinner. How do you fit

0:45:52.040 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 1>all them into an eleven?

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 3>It's a good point. Who didn't play in this last week?

0:45:55.200 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 3>I didn't play. I didn't pay attention to that Will Sutherland,

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:00.440
<v Speaker 3>was he manage or did he play? Have to check

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 3>this scorecard with THEE. But now Will was there, I

0:46:03.200 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 3>would dare say that all of them can bat.

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that makes it tough too, But.

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Then I'm like, well, can you find a way to

0:46:11.360 --> 0:46:14.799
<v Speaker 3>play them all as well? I know, well there's going

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:16.759
<v Speaker 3>to be someone unlike because you can't fit them all in.

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:19.880
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, obviously Will's captain, so he's in. Scott

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:24.719
<v Speaker 3>Bland's first picked. Fergus o'neils arguably second picked. You're going

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:28.520
<v Speaker 3>to need a spinner. Sam Elliot's made a pretty good

0:46:28.520 --> 0:46:31.880
<v Speaker 3>case too be third picked. He can also bat. He's

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:34.840
<v Speaker 3>very handy with the bat, so I mean minch Perry

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:38.120
<v Speaker 3>is the one there who's probably unlucky, but again he

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 3>can bat. He's had a good year especially he's come

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:46.479
<v Speaker 3>into form in the last few rounds, so good luck.

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Tough on the was ferguson neil who was left out

0:46:50.960 --> 0:46:55.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously resting, But yeah, it's going to be a selection crunch,

0:46:56.000 --> 0:46:58.799
<v Speaker 1>which good teams well often have, don't they.

0:46:58.880 --> 0:47:02.040
<v Speaker 3>That's often the result of a strong season and a

0:47:02.040 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 3>good team is that someone is going to be left out.

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:09.799
<v Speaker 3>So been there the one season actually had a good

0:47:09.880 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 3>year in child cricket, actually ran the drinks in al Springs.

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:15.399
<v Speaker 3>That was the end of my shill career. So you've

0:47:15.440 --> 0:47:16.000
<v Speaker 3>shared that one.

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah that's a real but.

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:21.320
<v Speaker 3>That was my decision to be like, well stuff this format,

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:24.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm not playing it anymore. But I es they would

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:26.160
<v Speaker 3>look forward Mitch Perry's a young kid. If he does

0:47:26.239 --> 0:47:29.320
<v Speaker 3>miss out and we're speculating here, but he'll get another

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:32.919
<v Speaker 3>opportunity at some point in the next five ten years.

0:47:33.920 --> 0:47:36.320
<v Speaker 2>You would think, how quickly did you make a decision

0:47:36.400 --> 0:47:37.200
<v Speaker 2>to throw them?

0:47:37.239 --> 0:47:39.799
<v Speaker 3>I think it was as the coin went out tay one.

0:47:40.800 --> 0:47:42.279
<v Speaker 3>That was a long five days now.

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:43.840
<v Speaker 1>It was a bit of a dead rubber out of cricket.

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Central New South Wales took on WA in the final

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:50.200
<v Speaker 1>matches for both Greg Ship and Adam Vergas as their

0:47:50.400 --> 0:47:52.799
<v Speaker 1>head coaches. And even though there was nothing on the line,

0:47:52.840 --> 0:47:56.680
<v Speaker 1>we've got a great finish four overs to go. Sean

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Abott had just taken the eighth wicket of the w

0:47:59.600 --> 0:48:02.640
<v Speaker 1>A eating Westerners. I can't win this match, so they're

0:48:02.640 --> 0:48:05.759
<v Speaker 1>trying to hold on for a draw and then the

0:48:05.840 --> 0:48:08.120
<v Speaker 1>umpires say the light's too bad. You have to knoww

0:48:08.160 --> 0:48:09.760
<v Speaker 1>your spinners. I thought that was a bit of a shame,

0:48:09.920 --> 0:48:13.440
<v Speaker 1>but you know, safety comes first. And then Joel Davies

0:48:13.440 --> 0:48:15.319
<v Speaker 1>manages to get a wicked in the final over and

0:48:15.320 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 1>then has three balls to get out Esther Hazen the

0:48:19.280 --> 0:48:22.480
<v Speaker 1>new number eleven. He gets off strike and Corey rocket

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Jolie some great names down there in that lower order

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:27.640
<v Speaker 1>manages to hang on. So that was a fun way

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to finish the regular season, wasn't it.

0:48:29.600 --> 0:48:31.759
<v Speaker 3>It is It's always good to see games go down

0:48:31.800 --> 0:48:34.120
<v Speaker 3>to that kind of Yeah, the last over and you

0:48:34.239 --> 0:48:39.960
<v Speaker 3>got eleven Blokes Award and you've got wives. Salzman was

0:48:40.000 --> 0:48:43.760
<v Speaker 3>bowling part time spin because he's he's normally a quick

0:48:43.960 --> 0:48:46.080
<v Speaker 3>but he's coming off a really bad hamstring injury, so

0:48:46.280 --> 0:48:49.560
<v Speaker 3>thrown the ball to him. Yeah, and he actually looked right,

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:53.480
<v Speaker 3>to be honest, So interesting. Yeah, it's always I mean,

0:48:53.560 --> 0:48:55.239
<v Speaker 3>for the last game of the year, you want to

0:48:55.960 --> 0:48:57.640
<v Speaker 3>go on a bit of tense action, don't you, and

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:01.840
<v Speaker 3>a result they can happened. So yeah, with some good viewing.

0:49:02.360 --> 0:49:05.200
<v Speaker 3>Cam Green back in the runs for w A in

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:06.960
<v Speaker 3>that game as well, which is always nice to see

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:10.279
<v Speaker 3>again big names go back to State cricket and kind

0:49:10.320 --> 0:49:14.239
<v Speaker 3>of show everyone again how good they are. So Rocketcolie

0:49:14.239 --> 0:49:16.520
<v Speaker 3>with five wickets, so he's a name going forward that's

0:49:16.680 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 3>again going to keep being around the mark for that

0:49:19.560 --> 0:49:22.840
<v Speaker 3>spinner spot if theory ever is one that vacates. So

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, mainly the talking point was about the coaches,

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:27.759
<v Speaker 3>but it was it was a pretty good game.

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Of cricket that got played and Tasmania.

0:49:30.040 --> 0:49:32.640
<v Speaker 1>They smashed Queensland down in Hobart, a real missed opportunity

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 1>for the Bulls there. Unfortunately they're batting just didn't quite

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:38.200
<v Speaker 1>click at the end of this season. They were sitting

0:49:38.280 --> 0:49:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in second place for a good bit of this second

0:49:40.640 --> 0:49:42.520
<v Speaker 1>half of this season and just sort of fell away

0:49:42.560 --> 0:49:45.160
<v Speaker 1>at the end. So disappointing a result for them, but

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Tazzy they managed to finish with a really strong win

0:49:47.960 --> 0:49:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and potentially take some momentum into next season.

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that'd be disappointed again, no doubt. With I

0:49:54.080 --> 0:49:55.960
<v Speaker 3>tipped them. I just had this weird feeling they would

0:49:56.239 --> 0:49:59.640
<v Speaker 3>with Jackson byrd back and as we talked about before

0:49:59.719 --> 0:50:01.920
<v Speaker 3>the I feel like they've got a good depth of

0:50:01.920 --> 0:50:04.320
<v Speaker 3>fast bowling there now, so I feel like there was

0:50:04.360 --> 0:50:06.399
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a missed opportunity for them. But as

0:50:06.440 --> 0:50:09.799
<v Speaker 3>you say, there's there is always next year and for

0:50:09.880 --> 0:50:13.120
<v Speaker 3>queens And yeah, they'll be kicking themselves, no doubt, because

0:50:13.120 --> 0:50:16.279
<v Speaker 3>it was there for them, that opportunity in the first

0:50:16.320 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 3>innings with the bat to really capitalize and put themselves

0:50:18.560 --> 0:50:21.720
<v Speaker 3>in the opportunity to play in the shilld Final again

0:50:21.800 --> 0:50:23.359
<v Speaker 3>like they did last year it would have been away

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:26.080
<v Speaker 3>from home, but you'd learn your lessons from kind of

0:50:26.120 --> 0:50:28.200
<v Speaker 3>how last year's final went. What can you do better.

0:50:28.280 --> 0:50:30.160
<v Speaker 3>You've got big names in that team that came back.

0:50:30.280 --> 0:50:34.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean Usmond Kwaja's domestic career or four d a

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:37.719
<v Speaker 3>career is now done so and he missed this game

0:50:37.960 --> 0:50:43.840
<v Speaker 3>the through paternity leave. So yeah, they'll be disappointed. Michael Nessa.

0:50:43.920 --> 0:50:45.759
<v Speaker 3>You know all these guys, they're just they're going to

0:50:45.760 --> 0:50:47.239
<v Speaker 3>be another year old and you might not get that

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:51.040
<v Speaker 3>opportunity again. So again, to be an opportunity to play

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Shill finals is what it's all about. But then to

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:55.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of miss the opportunity is a bit of a kicker.

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:58.480
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, they'll be disappointed. As they hit their mad

0:50:58.520 --> 0:50:59.759
<v Speaker 3>Mondays around the.

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Country and from Queensland's point of view, they were smashed

0:51:02.719 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>with injuries. Yeah, but in the bowling department, so it

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:07.919
<v Speaker 1>must be said that it feels funny that it hasn't

0:51:07.920 --> 0:51:09.080
<v Speaker 1>been their bowling that's lewed down.

0:51:09.120 --> 0:51:09.800
<v Speaker 2>It's been the batting.

0:51:09.880 --> 0:51:12.400
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, yeah, as you said, they've probably had to

0:51:12.400 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 1>do a Bricket Creek hotel and have a few jars

0:51:16.239 --> 0:51:17.520
<v Speaker 1>just to see off the season.

0:51:17.560 --> 0:51:20.839
<v Speaker 3>I imagine yeah, they're probably not alone. It's four other

0:51:20.880 --> 0:51:24.080
<v Speaker 3>states doll on the same thing, isn't it. So yeah,

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:27.000
<v Speaker 3>it's always it's a weird time of year because I'm

0:51:27.000 --> 0:51:29.040
<v Speaker 3>sure some of the bowlers have had really long Like

0:51:29.080 --> 0:51:31.799
<v Speaker 3>Cameron Gannon, I'm pretty sure he played basically every Shield game.

0:51:31.800 --> 0:51:34.279
<v Speaker 3>He did ye every time, which is amazing achievement at

0:51:34.280 --> 0:51:37.000
<v Speaker 3>his age. So he'd be probably enjoying waking up today

0:51:37.000 --> 0:51:39.560
<v Speaker 3>and having a beer the Sarva and looking forward to

0:51:39.640 --> 0:51:41.360
<v Speaker 3>a few weeks off, whereas I think there'd be some

0:51:41.400 --> 0:51:44.360
<v Speaker 3>other guys who wake up and the disappointment of not

0:51:44.440 --> 0:51:47.800
<v Speaker 3>being able to capitalize on again another year. Everyone's another

0:51:47.840 --> 0:51:51.160
<v Speaker 3>year older. These opportunities don't always come around, so it's

0:51:51.160 --> 0:51:54.080
<v Speaker 3>probably not something we're focused on enough. Is those domestic

0:51:54.120 --> 0:51:57.000
<v Speaker 3>cricket guys who don't always get to play for Australia

0:51:57.000 --> 0:51:59.560
<v Speaker 3>like a Cameron Gannon, but have these amazing domestic careers.

0:51:59.600 --> 0:52:02.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, you want to be winning trophies and WA

0:52:02.480 --> 0:52:05.600
<v Speaker 3>have had two years now down the bottom. So new

0:52:05.640 --> 0:52:08.120
<v Speaker 3>coach coming in for them that'll be an opportunity to

0:52:08.120 --> 0:52:10.399
<v Speaker 3>bounce back. But yeah, it's a weird timmy year for sure.

0:52:10.760 --> 0:52:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Leading week taker Liam Hatcher. He's doing a drink too.

0:52:13.680 --> 0:52:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I reckon amazing effort from him. Nine games and forty

0:52:16.400 --> 0:52:19.680
<v Speaker 1>three or forty four wickets, so certainly break that year

0:52:19.680 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 1>from him absolutely.

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:24.000
<v Speaker 3>I think he took another half a dozen for this game.

0:52:24.120 --> 0:52:26.560
<v Speaker 3>So to do it at that ground as well, I'd

0:52:26.600 --> 0:52:28.719
<v Speaker 3>like to play a few games at Cricket Central. It's

0:52:28.760 --> 0:52:32.560
<v Speaker 3>pretty flat there, so we talk about semi friendly conditions

0:52:32.560 --> 0:52:34.920
<v Speaker 3>in the shield at the moment, but probably not. He's

0:52:34.920 --> 0:52:36.520
<v Speaker 3>probably the one guy wh's be like, hang on, what

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:40.359
<v Speaker 3>about me? So he's at a good age going forward

0:52:40.400 --> 0:52:42.799
<v Speaker 3>where if he can put together another strong summer next

0:52:42.840 --> 0:52:45.200
<v Speaker 3>year with as we've spoken about it at length, the

0:52:45.239 --> 0:52:47.640
<v Speaker 3>age of our our quicks in the national team, he

0:52:47.680 --> 0:52:49.680
<v Speaker 3>could be something that kind of comes from nowhere and

0:52:50.400 --> 0:52:51.200
<v Speaker 3>puts his hand up.

0:52:51.400 --> 0:52:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay.

0:52:52.360 --> 0:52:55.279
<v Speaker 1>WNCL Final that's coming up on Saturday as well. This

0:52:55.320 --> 0:52:57.520
<v Speaker 1>week it's going to be New South Wales hosting Queensland

0:52:57.560 --> 0:53:02.000
<v Speaker 1>at Cricket Central. Honeston and Sam Bates they're playing on

0:53:02.040 --> 0:53:04.719
<v Speaker 1>opposition teams, but they both play their one hundredth match

0:53:05.160 --> 0:53:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in the competition over the weekend. Jonathon conversely, has played

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:13.759
<v Speaker 1>all one hundred for Quensane, whereas Baits has played for

0:53:13.800 --> 0:53:17.279
<v Speaker 1>ACT Tasmania, Victoria and now in New South walesa so

0:53:17.600 --> 0:53:20.600
<v Speaker 1>really doing the rounds there and she's been a consistent

0:53:20.600 --> 0:53:24.719
<v Speaker 1>performer everywhere she's gone. Katie Mack recently announced or just

0:53:24.840 --> 0:53:28.239
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday as we're recording, as the player of the tournament.

0:53:29.040 --> 0:53:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Another great season for her, so consistent. She's been dismissed

0:53:33.320 --> 0:53:36.719
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties three times this season, unfortunate for her.

0:53:36.800 --> 0:53:39.759
<v Speaker 1>But it's the first time anybody's ever managed that feed

0:53:39.920 --> 0:53:42.880
<v Speaker 1>in the WNCL, So a little bit of a history.

0:53:42.920 --> 0:53:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not one year what but you'd rather a ninety

0:53:45.280 --> 0:53:46.400
<v Speaker 1>than a zero, wouldn't.

0:53:46.120 --> 0:53:47.640
<v Speaker 3>That's what I was about to say. So there'd be

0:53:47.680 --> 0:53:49.719
<v Speaker 3>a record for someone who's made the most ducks and yeah,

0:53:50.400 --> 0:53:53.800
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't be her exactly. No, she's had a great season,

0:53:53.880 --> 0:53:55.359
<v Speaker 3>same in the big batch, so that'd be a really

0:53:55.360 --> 0:53:59.200
<v Speaker 3>good final bit of a State of Origin finals the

0:53:59.280 --> 0:54:02.560
<v Speaker 3>SA Victoria, the AFL True and then Queens and New

0:54:02.600 --> 0:54:07.759
<v Speaker 3>South obviously in the rugby league department, So two storied rivals,

0:54:07.880 --> 0:54:11.200
<v Speaker 3>two storied rivals in two different areas of the country.

0:54:11.280 --> 0:54:15.319
<v Speaker 3>So be some passionate supporters getting getting amongst or down

0:54:15.360 --> 0:54:16.680
<v Speaker 3>to those games as well.

0:54:16.520 --> 0:54:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel that rivalry when you're playing for South Australia.

0:54:20.200 --> 0:54:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Is there that hatred or despise of other teams or

0:54:23.640 --> 0:54:25.240
<v Speaker 1>is it a bit different in cricket circles.

0:54:25.680 --> 0:54:28.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, I was. I was raised being South AUSI to

0:54:28.520 --> 0:54:30.880
<v Speaker 3>not like Victorians like that was a big thing. Like

0:54:30.920 --> 0:54:34.520
<v Speaker 3>the kickovick was quite a big thing, wasn't it. You're

0:54:34.520 --> 0:54:36.239
<v Speaker 3>a Victorian, Yeah did you?

0:54:36.280 --> 0:54:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, we didn't hear that because yeah.

0:54:37.719 --> 0:54:41.200
<v Speaker 3>But it was probably a smaller like a little brother.

0:54:41.600 --> 0:54:46.000
<v Speaker 3>So you wouldn't have a hatred towards South Australia because Victorian.

0:54:46.120 --> 0:54:49.480
<v Speaker 3>That's why we that's what we hated Victorians.

0:54:49.320 --> 0:54:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Like Australia New Zealand.

0:54:50.600 --> 0:54:52.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, a little bit of that isn't a little

0:54:52.719 --> 0:54:56.719
<v Speaker 3>brother thing. So there was definitely definitely that. And if

0:54:56.719 --> 0:54:59.359
<v Speaker 3>you're raised on the like I said, the AFL state

0:54:59.360 --> 0:55:01.839
<v Speaker 3>of origin that was that was quite a big part

0:55:01.880 --> 0:55:03.759
<v Speaker 3>of it as well. And that's the same inquison you

0:55:03.840 --> 0:55:07.320
<v Speaker 3>So kids are raised watching rugby league, state of origin,

0:55:07.360 --> 0:55:10.200
<v Speaker 3>you pick a team or wherever you're born you affiliate with.

0:55:10.360 --> 0:55:13.400
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not commenting for them, but I was definitely

0:55:13.520 --> 0:55:16.680
<v Speaker 3>raised as kay when I played Victoria and cricket. It

0:55:16.760 --> 0:55:18.800
<v Speaker 3>was like, go a little bit harder, but also insane

0:55:18.800 --> 0:55:21.359
<v Speaker 3>that it's amazing and they're full of like basically an

0:55:21.400 --> 0:55:24.719
<v Speaker 3>international team. So I say that, but I definitely didn't

0:55:24.719 --> 0:55:27.640
<v Speaker 3>say anything on the field to show my hatred.

0:55:29.760 --> 0:55:32.600
<v Speaker 1>So good luck to both the Breakers and the Fire.

0:55:33.080 --> 0:55:36.759
<v Speaker 1>This week in the WSCLF, Who's you pick? You said,

0:55:36.960 --> 0:55:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I've only lost one match this season. They're playing at home.

0:55:40.239 --> 0:55:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Alissa Healy is going to be playing in her final

0:55:43.040 --> 0:55:45.319
<v Speaker 1>match of cricket. They're going to be keen to see

0:55:45.360 --> 0:55:48.200
<v Speaker 1>her off on a high. This is it, Tarlie Wilson,

0:55:48.440 --> 0:55:50.480
<v Speaker 1>she's been a star. She's just been picked in her

0:55:50.480 --> 0:55:54.560
<v Speaker 1>first audio squad and she's on the Scoop podcast this

0:55:54.600 --> 0:55:56.520
<v Speaker 1>week as well, so if you want to hear from.

0:55:56.400 --> 0:55:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Talia a Scoop podcast.

0:55:59.320 --> 0:56:01.719
<v Speaker 1>I would love to see the Fire make amends for

0:56:01.800 --> 0:56:05.160
<v Speaker 1>last season, but I think I have to if I'm tipping,

0:56:05.400 --> 0:56:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably going to be tipping the Breakers.

0:56:07.400 --> 0:56:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Yep, that's fair. Yeah at home, I think so. Like

0:56:10.160 --> 0:56:13.160
<v Speaker 3>you said, the season has been pretty amazing, but you

0:56:13.320 --> 0:56:15.400
<v Speaker 3>just never known vinyls do you what about in the shield?

0:56:15.480 --> 0:56:16.040
<v Speaker 3>What do you reckon?

0:56:16.120 --> 0:56:18.719
<v Speaker 2>What's your feel shield? We've got a little bit of.

0:56:18.800 --> 0:56:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Time, yeah, and talk about the time we sit on that.

0:56:21.560 --> 0:56:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, sit on that, but we'd love like to hear

0:56:24.640 --> 0:56:26.759
<v Speaker 1>who our listeners think. Yep, it's going to do well,

0:56:26.800 --> 0:56:29.480
<v Speaker 1>so send them in podcast. Cricket dot com dot you

0:56:29.680 --> 0:56:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is the place to do that, or on Instagram if

0:56:31.480 --> 0:56:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you want. And speaking of that early I squad.

0:56:35.360 --> 0:56:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Rich.

0:56:35.640 --> 0:56:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh, we've got astray over in the West Indies at

0:56:37.640 --> 0:56:41.879
<v Speaker 1>the minute playing some women's internationals. They're playing three T

0:56:41.880 --> 0:56:46.719
<v Speaker 1>twenties in St. Vincent, beautiful little Caribbean island there. Those

0:56:46.760 --> 0:56:50.160
<v Speaker 1>matches are early morning for Australia on March twenty, twenty

0:56:50.239 --> 0:56:53.719
<v Speaker 1>two and twenty four, really good times and actually I

0:56:53.719 --> 0:56:55.600
<v Speaker 1>think they're starting at nine or ten in the morning

0:56:56.120 --> 0:56:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're available on Disney Plus, so if you have

0:56:59.040 --> 0:57:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that streaming of us then you'll be able to watch.

0:57:02.840 --> 0:57:05.479
<v Speaker 1>And then some matches in St Kits free Odi eyes

0:57:06.000 --> 0:57:09.600
<v Speaker 1>March twenty eight, March thirty and April third. So it's

0:57:09.640 --> 0:57:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a very short and sharp little series, but a nice

0:57:12.320 --> 0:57:15.080
<v Speaker 1>warm up for the T twenty World Cup. I think

0:57:15.880 --> 0:57:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you said you haven't been to Saint Vincent, but I

0:57:19.120 --> 0:57:21.600
<v Speaker 1>was there two years ago for the T twenty World

0:57:21.680 --> 0:57:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Cup and it was a really beautiful ground, just a

0:57:25.680 --> 0:57:29.200
<v Speaker 1>tiny island really, and it was the match where Afghanistan

0:57:29.280 --> 0:57:33.479
<v Speaker 1>beat Australia in that crucial pool match or Super six match,

0:57:34.080 --> 0:57:37.439
<v Speaker 1>and we were watching the game in Afghanistan. We're getting

0:57:37.440 --> 0:57:39.960
<v Speaker 1>close to victory. I think they just hit a four

0:57:41.400 --> 0:57:43.120
<v Speaker 1>or taken a wicket. I can't remember if they were

0:57:43.200 --> 0:57:46.360
<v Speaker 1>fielding first or batting first. And there wasn't much of

0:57:46.400 --> 0:57:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a crowd there, but we felt a bit of a

0:57:48.520 --> 0:57:51.880
<v Speaker 1>shake in the grandstand as if you know, there's been

0:57:51.920 --> 0:57:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a big roar. We only learned later that the ground

0:57:54.920 --> 0:57:57.480
<v Speaker 1>was hit by an earthquake during the match, so the

0:57:57.520 --> 0:58:02.360
<v Speaker 1>shake we felt was actually the trend of seismic activity.

0:58:02.440 --> 0:58:04.360
<v Speaker 3>So what was the number on the Richter scales?

0:58:04.520 --> 0:58:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Is your six point seven? I think in the end,

0:58:06.920 --> 0:58:08.680
<v Speaker 2>so decent, not small? Yeah?

0:58:08.920 --> 0:58:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Is that a common common.

0:58:10.480 --> 0:58:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Thing there that I have no idea.

0:58:12.120 --> 0:58:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't sort of once off look into it, but

0:58:15.440 --> 0:58:19.120
<v Speaker 1>it sort of matched that well with Australia getting shaken

0:58:19.120 --> 0:58:22.560
<v Speaker 1>out of that tournament at the same time. So that's

0:58:22.600 --> 0:58:25.760
<v Speaker 1>my little memory of Saint Vincent and I'd love to

0:58:25.760 --> 0:58:27.360
<v Speaker 1>go back on there.

0:58:27.440 --> 0:58:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Unfortunately, you didn't get to go on this tour, but

0:58:30.160 --> 0:58:33.560
<v Speaker 3>as always a future tour program, there's I'm sure you'll

0:58:33.560 --> 0:58:35.440
<v Speaker 3>get I'm sure we get another. I actually never went

0:58:35.440 --> 0:58:36.880
<v Speaker 3>to the caravan. That was the one place I never

0:58:36.920 --> 0:58:38.000
<v Speaker 3>got to. Well, never toured.

0:58:38.560 --> 0:58:39.080
<v Speaker 2>That's a shame.

0:58:39.320 --> 0:58:41.560
<v Speaker 3>So but there was one during COVID, so I'm not

0:58:41.560 --> 0:58:43.960
<v Speaker 3>sure it would have been the same. I withdrew from that,

0:58:44.040 --> 0:58:45.640
<v Speaker 3>but even if I went, I'm not sure it would

0:58:45.640 --> 0:58:47.600
<v Speaker 3>have been the same experience. Although I'm pretty sure the

0:58:47.640 --> 0:58:49.960
<v Speaker 3>boys went on a massive boat at some point had

0:58:49.960 --> 0:58:51.760
<v Speaker 3>a party, so maybe I should.

0:58:51.480 --> 0:58:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Have that sounds fun.

0:58:52.160 --> 0:58:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Should have gone.

0:58:53.040 --> 0:58:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Caravan Premier League never came across your desk.

0:58:55.240 --> 0:58:58.360
<v Speaker 3>Apparently it was. It was a real tough one for Well.

0:58:58.440 --> 0:59:00.800
<v Speaker 3>I think the time was leading into the Australian season,

0:59:00.840 --> 0:59:02.440
<v Speaker 3>so I was always hard as a policy to get

0:59:02.440 --> 0:59:04.240
<v Speaker 3>over there, but also a lot of.

0:59:04.280 --> 0:59:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Travel between Iland. Oh that's true.

0:59:06.600 --> 0:59:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, even getting there was a big commitment. So yeah, yeah,

0:59:09.920 --> 0:59:12.280
<v Speaker 3>never got as across the desk to that one. Maybe

0:59:12.280 --> 0:59:15.360
<v Speaker 3>one day as a coach or a journal you never know. Yeah, okay, okay,

0:59:15.360 --> 0:59:16.600
<v Speaker 3>maybe we'll do it together one day.

0:59:16.720 --> 0:59:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Sounds good to me.

0:59:17.720 --> 0:59:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's say a quick break when we come back. We'll

0:59:20.360 --> 0:59:22.880
<v Speaker 1>get stuck into this week's Big Four, looking at the

0:59:22.880 --> 0:59:30.360
<v Speaker 1>best Grand Finals this century. Okay, Richard, we've had some

0:59:30.480 --> 0:59:32.840
<v Speaker 1>listener feedback. A couple of weeks ago. We got you

0:59:32.920 --> 0:59:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to talk about your favorite bowling actions past or present.

0:59:36.800 --> 0:59:39.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people agreed with your list, including Adam Rompel.

0:59:40.280 --> 0:59:43.320
<v Speaker 2>He said, very good list, rich O. Shane Bond definitely

0:59:43.480 --> 0:59:46.800
<v Speaker 2>underrated and they got a lot of likes, So thank you, Adam.

0:59:46.800 --> 0:59:49.360
<v Speaker 2>I can't go wrong with Shane Bond. And Lord Humongous

0:59:49.680 --> 0:59:52.840
<v Speaker 2>said Chris Can's had a good at bowling action as well,

0:59:52.840 --> 0:59:55.800
<v Speaker 2>another New Zealander. Yeah, maybe a little bit on the nose.

0:59:56.040 --> 0:59:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's probably we'll leave that one.

0:59:58.280 --> 0:59:58.960
<v Speaker 2>There, Okay.

0:59:59.040 --> 1:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Locke, Simon Jones, Okay, he's speaking of underrated two

1:00:04.080 --> 1:00:04.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand and five.

1:00:04.880 --> 1:00:10.000
<v Speaker 3>That is strong, strong action, smooth smooth. Yep. He was good.

1:00:10.480 --> 1:00:11.080
<v Speaker 3>He was very good.

1:00:11.120 --> 1:00:11.640
<v Speaker 2>He could swing.

1:00:12.440 --> 1:00:14.720
<v Speaker 3>I always think of him the Poor when he did

1:00:14.760 --> 1:00:17.400
<v Speaker 3>his knee at the Gabba that first test. I know

1:00:17.440 --> 1:00:20.600
<v Speaker 3>he came back after that or was that after the five?

1:00:20.800 --> 1:00:25.320
<v Speaker 3>Now that yeah, two obviously five peaked a peak of

1:00:25.360 --> 1:00:27.520
<v Speaker 3>his powers, but I always think of that knee injury

1:00:27.560 --> 1:00:31.160
<v Speaker 3>the Poor like first day yet Yeah, terrible, but he was.

1:00:31.240 --> 1:00:31.800
<v Speaker 3>He was a gun.

1:00:31.920 --> 1:00:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Should fast bawlers be sliding around in the airfield?

1:00:34.840 --> 1:00:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Look at him these days, they're everywhere, so yes, okay.

1:00:38.360 --> 1:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>And then dill Park he gave us a triple threat.

1:00:41.560 --> 1:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>He went Anderson at gram and Stein. Sorry Stain, he's

1:00:46.840 --> 1:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>he is.

1:00:47.600 --> 1:00:49.600
<v Speaker 3>I did miss on that, but I kind of, I

1:00:49.680 --> 1:00:52.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of said, Jordan Buckingham reminds me of it, did

1:00:52.280 --> 1:00:54.920
<v Speaker 3>stay and I could have easily gone to him. He's

1:00:55.080 --> 1:00:58.439
<v Speaker 3>definitely built again, built in a laboratory for fast bowling.

1:00:58.520 --> 1:01:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Dal Stain, apart from his high which is probably what

1:01:01.440 --> 1:01:04.120
<v Speaker 3>made him so amazing, igine if he was six seven

1:01:04.160 --> 1:01:08.320
<v Speaker 3>like more name Morca was like, there's another one with

1:01:08.440 --> 1:01:14.240
<v Speaker 3>the Akram and Jimmy, Yeah.

1:01:14.040 --> 1:01:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Their own He's no wrong.

1:01:15.200 --> 1:01:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's everyone's opinion, isn't it. Everyone's taste. Everyone has

1:01:18.760 --> 1:01:22.080
<v Speaker 3>different tastes. Left handed, well, left arms versus right arms swing.

1:01:22.480 --> 1:01:25.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, everyone's got their own. Everyone's got their own. Look.

1:01:27.320 --> 1:01:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Did you play against al Stand in the Big Bash?

1:01:29.240 --> 1:01:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I did? Yeah?

1:01:30.120 --> 1:01:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Did he have the crazy eyes going well?

1:01:32.160 --> 1:01:35.120
<v Speaker 3>I think I faced last ball of the innings right

1:01:35.280 --> 1:01:37.280
<v Speaker 3>when he was playing for the Stars. Yeah, yeah, And

1:01:37.320 --> 1:01:39.000
<v Speaker 3>it was just a little white York at the hip

1:01:39.000 --> 1:01:42.479
<v Speaker 3>for one, so yeah, I was striking one hundred too,

1:01:43.240 --> 1:01:45.479
<v Speaker 3>but he didn't have crazy eyes because it was Yeah,

1:01:45.560 --> 1:01:47.520
<v Speaker 3>he was just kind of going through the motions pretty well.

1:01:47.600 --> 1:01:49.320
<v Speaker 3>I think he had like three for twenty or four.

1:01:49.400 --> 1:01:53.200
<v Speaker 3>But he was again one of those through the form

1:01:53.280 --> 1:01:56.000
<v Speaker 3>my kind of twenties that every time he bowled on

1:01:56.200 --> 1:01:58.640
<v Speaker 3>to watch. So absolutely and a beautiful one of the

1:01:58.640 --> 1:01:59.960
<v Speaker 3>best blocks going around.

1:02:00.160 --> 1:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, great, So this week's top four richro to

1:02:02.760 --> 1:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>finish us off this week is the best Grand Finals

1:02:06.520 --> 1:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>this century because obviously we've got the WNCL coming after

1:02:09.240 --> 1:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>One Day Cups just finished Sheffield Shield. Next week it's

1:02:12.520 --> 1:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>trophy season's final season. Oscars, So oscars this week? Are they?

1:02:20.280 --> 1:02:21.760
<v Speaker 2>So I've gone through the best.

1:02:21.840 --> 1:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Now I've gone domestic and international and so obviously a

1:02:24.480 --> 1:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>lot to choose from. So a rattle through these I'll

1:02:27.200 --> 1:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>get your opinion.

1:02:28.760 --> 1:02:29.040
<v Speaker 2>First.

1:02:29.120 --> 1:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I've gone for the twenty ten T twenty World Cup

1:02:33.520 --> 1:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Caribbean and Australia Women's beat New Zealand by

1:02:36.560 --> 1:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>three runs. Sophie Devine last ball Evenings five to win

1:02:40.880 --> 1:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>off one ball, she smashed it straight back of the

1:02:43.400 --> 1:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Elise Perry and Perry's put her foot out stopped the

1:02:46.240 --> 1:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>full stopped it going to a super over. Australia win

1:02:49.080 --> 1:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Australian men's team are there watching as well.

1:02:51.560 --> 1:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>You don't get to see that very often. It's a

1:02:53.640 --> 1:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>nice wholesome moment. Australia win that one in Bridgetown. Number three,

1:02:57.280 --> 1:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I've got the BBL four Final six and scorches Brettley's

1:03:01.400 --> 1:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>final game. Incredible finish, couple wickets and then a run off.

1:03:06.800 --> 1:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>The final ball could have gone either way that one. Yeah,

1:03:10.880 --> 1:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>so that was a classic. I've gone the twenty twenty

1:03:14.320 --> 1:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>three ODI Mentor Cup Australia beating India at the Metabad.

1:03:19.640 --> 1:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Pretty incredible stuff. They'd look untouchable all tournament in Australia

1:03:24.080 --> 1:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Travis Head. Just get the job done. And

1:03:27.320 --> 1:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>then number one, I've gone for the Riobi Cup. Finally,

1:03:31.040 --> 1:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty eleven twelve South Australia and Tasmania tied match no

1:03:36.720 --> 1:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>super over in the playing conditions that year. A tie

1:03:39.040 --> 1:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>is good enough for South Australia and Gary Putland is

1:03:41.920 --> 1:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the hero.

1:03:42.400 --> 1:03:44.360
<v Speaker 3>For Iceman the finish Southustralia.

1:03:44.400 --> 1:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the finish he was he went by the iceman

1:03:47.640 --> 1:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the iceman from that night on Yeah, and so we

1:03:50.920 --> 1:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>actually did an in depth look at that match on

1:03:53.920 --> 1:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Stories after Stumps, So jump over onto that podcast if

1:03:57.520 --> 1:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to have a listen to Gary Putland and

1:03:59.440 --> 1:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Theodore Appolis Daniel Harris that those sorts of guys and

1:04:04.280 --> 1:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>cross wait reminisce about that particular night where Ricky Ponting

1:04:08.400 --> 1:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>was running without pads at the non strikers end at

1:04:10.760 --> 1:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the end of that.

1:04:11.160 --> 1:04:14.320
<v Speaker 3>Match, famous one that so I had to in case

1:04:14.360 --> 1:04:15.840
<v Speaker 3>you missed them, which I didn't think you would, but

1:04:15.880 --> 1:04:18.840
<v Speaker 3>it was that one and the BBL fourth Finals. So

1:04:19.240 --> 1:04:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Bradley's last game camera of all places.

1:04:22.120 --> 1:04:23.440
<v Speaker 2>And neutral final venue.

1:04:24.320 --> 1:04:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Can we can we can someone tell us why that was.

1:04:26.880 --> 1:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they just wanted to try it out and

1:04:28.600 --> 1:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>make sure that there was no homered that was scheduled

1:04:31.520 --> 1:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>pre Yeah, it was well before the start of the.

1:04:33.600 --> 1:04:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Season, adelaide. It was in camera, that's right, So trying

1:04:37.120 --> 1:04:39.120
<v Speaker 3>to make a bit of a I think, right. Okay,

1:04:39.200 --> 1:04:43.160
<v Speaker 3>so that lasted one year, but it was a great game.

1:04:43.240 --> 1:04:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Brettley's last Moses Enriquez luffed at. Sorry to bring it

1:04:47.360 --> 1:04:50.240
<v Speaker 3>up though that it happened. That was a good throw

1:04:50.360 --> 1:04:51.320
<v Speaker 3>I think who threw it in.

1:04:51.400 --> 1:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Was it Michael Lum possibly, Yeah, because all of the

1:04:55.280 --> 1:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>field was in.

1:04:56.000 --> 1:05:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Fada he bowled such a good last over, dragged

1:05:00.080 --> 1:05:03.160
<v Speaker 3>them back and storied rivalry again between those two. So

1:05:03.960 --> 1:05:06.680
<v Speaker 3>I had the chainsaw going out, like we spoke about

1:05:06.720 --> 1:05:09.200
<v Speaker 3>as a couple of times, that was that was a

1:05:09.200 --> 1:05:12.320
<v Speaker 3>great final. And then well, I'm going to be biased BBLA.

1:05:12.480 --> 1:05:14.000
<v Speaker 3>I thought you were going to mention that, Yeah, well

1:05:14.040 --> 1:05:17.800
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't a classic final. It kind of was, I think,

1:05:17.840 --> 1:05:19.440
<v Speaker 3>I think because it didn't go down to the why

1:05:19.560 --> 1:05:23.120
<v Speaker 3>the result was known probably with two oves to go

1:05:23.720 --> 1:05:25.600
<v Speaker 3>in the game, but I think the twist in the

1:05:25.640 --> 1:05:29.960
<v Speaker 3>game and being between two Melbourne teams neither had won,

1:05:31.040 --> 1:05:34.439
<v Speaker 3>it was on toast. Yeah. That that's probably the other

1:05:35.240 --> 1:05:36.400
<v Speaker 3>honorable fifth.

1:05:36.200 --> 1:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Definitely, because a lot of the international finals I sort

1:05:40.080 --> 1:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of scanned over haven't been that close. So I'm glad

1:05:43.440 --> 1:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>we've had some good bbl's and some good One Day

1:05:45.520 --> 1:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Cup finishes.

1:05:46.400 --> 1:05:48.000
<v Speaker 3>And there every year, aren't they. So we're going to

1:05:48.000 --> 1:05:50.400
<v Speaker 3>get like, yeah, the World Cup onths every four or

1:05:50.400 --> 1:05:53.200
<v Speaker 3>every two years, so it's probably harder to think back

1:05:53.240 --> 1:05:55.960
<v Speaker 3>whereas BBL every single year and you want a close one,

1:05:55.960 --> 1:05:57.960
<v Speaker 3>and you want one that you can talk about the

1:05:58.000 --> 1:06:00.959
<v Speaker 3>next however long. And that's a pretty good list.

1:06:01.400 --> 1:06:02.280
<v Speaker 2>I've done pretty well.

1:06:03.080 --> 1:06:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Send him in if you think of any others.

1:06:04.720 --> 1:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>No doubt we'll have some good nominations that we missed,

1:06:07.520 --> 1:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>because as you say, there's plenty that happened every year,

1:06:10.360 --> 1:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>so there'll be a few good ones in there.

1:06:11.640 --> 1:06:13.640
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, has there ever been a super other and

1:06:14.160 --> 1:06:18.560
<v Speaker 3>there hasn't has a big gush final semi. I can't

1:06:18.600 --> 1:06:20.400
<v Speaker 3>think of any that would be awesome.

1:06:20.840 --> 1:06:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, imagine that.

1:06:22.560 --> 1:06:23.640
<v Speaker 3>That's high high pressure.

1:06:23.680 --> 1:06:25.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, we'll have to come back next week and

1:06:25.160 --> 1:06:25.840
<v Speaker 2>finish this off.

1:06:26.360 --> 1:06:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Rich Oh, always a pleasure.