WEBVTT - Shani's Influencer Love Triangle & Hayley Vernon's Wild Ride

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Outspoken. The podcast is not afraid to say

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you're thinking. Our names are Amy Kate and

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Sophie Torvah. We're identical triplets, so we often don't have

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>identical opinions, so sometimes things can get heeded. Outspoken covers

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>all things reality TV, influences, entertainment, and issues facing with it.

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>That is so fat. Thank you. Welcome back to another

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>episode of Outspoken. Now today is just myself Kate along

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>with Sophie because Amy is actually not feeling too well,

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>so we've given her the day off and as a

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>chance for Sophie and I to talk about weddings. Because

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>whenever we're coming up with an idea for an intro,

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Sophie's always like, oh, give an update about the wedding,

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and Amy's like, no, that's boring. So today it's just

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>you and me. Well, I feel like people are interested

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>in weddings in general. I mean, I know that I

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>am vicariously living through the planning process of your wedding

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, so I really want to talk about it. Yeah, well,

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>there hasn't been too much to update. I think I

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>told everyone that we booked in our wedding venue. So

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that felt like a big weight off my shoulders. And

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the next step has been to book in a god.

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't even think of the name, not a priest

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>or a celebrant, a celebrant, that's how much I know

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>about wedding. So we do have a friend whose wife

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>is a celebrant, so it's worked out really well. So

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>we met with her and she was amazing. And now

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>recent and I've started to think about songs that we

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>play at out wedding and it's kind of a difficult

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>one because literally, I just love Taylor Swift so much

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that I would love to play her whole six albums

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>or however many albums she has at our wedding. So

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>are you talking about songs to play during the ceremony

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>itself or are you talking about having a DJ come

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>in and basically play Taylor Swift's whole album? So we're

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>more thinking about the song that you walk down the

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>aisle two, and then also like your first dance song

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and those sorts of like important songs or what Taylor

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Swift song were you thinking for the ceremony. Well, that's

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>where it's tough. I know, lover Is. I think they've

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>actually made a first dance rendition of the song. But

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:59.919
<v Speaker 1>I've got to say it's not really my favorite Taylor Swift's.

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>If I was gonna pick my favorite, it's you Belong

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>with Me. But as a sovereignt said, you would need

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a song like that to be played, like as a cover,

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>but potentially just musically, not with lyrics. So actually, I

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>went to a wedding last year where they had an

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>acoustic version of Lover, and it was so good, even

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>though it's not one of the Taylor Swift songs you've

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of grown up with and it's relatively new. Oh,

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I actually felt like crying when the song was on.

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>It was that good. Okay, well, maybe you have to

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>send me these people's details. I do feel like you

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Belong with Me does fit your particular love story though

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.239
<v Speaker 1>well reason I have made a joint Spotify list and

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>we're meant to be putting songs in there, but I

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like the songs rees likes a very ultra Romanticket's

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, really, what's Chrissy Teagan's husband's name, John Legend.

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of that that sort of John Legend via gosh. So,

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:57.519
<v Speaker 1>and I just feel awkward when they're played, so I

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's going to be kind of tough. Maybe

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>he'll have to choose one song for a special moment

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and I'll choose the other. It's funny because with the

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>three of us, ever since we were in year eight

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and saw the first episode of Newlyweds where Jessica Simpson

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>walked down the aisle as Nick Lache sang, I swear

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.679
<v Speaker 1>this that is where this. I swear we had a rite.

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>We have said that we all want that song at

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>our own weddings. I did say to Reese considering, I

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>assume our wedding will be the first. Who knows, But

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>if it is the first, I said, like, we've got

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that song, like we can have the song, and he's

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>very quickly vetoed it. So maybe you're in a chunk

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>with a chance to have it. I feel like that's

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>where either you'd have to actually have Nikola saying there

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>or an acoustic performance. You can't have a CD of it. Nickolache,

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>would you like to come and perform that song for me? Actually,

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I might get that over the line with Brandon one

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>day because he has a soft spot for nick Lache

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>now because he loves one tree Hill and Nick Lache

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>actually made a cameo appearance on One Tree Hill. Was

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>he Honor? Yes, he was on it. I think he

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>dated Brook. Oh yeah, sorry, Brandon just yelled he did.

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Are we allowed to have I swear our future wedding

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>one day? Brandon? No? Okay, Well I did say to

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Reese do you think someone like Millsy performing would be affordable?

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>And He's like no, he has been on the show before. Mane,

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you can extend an olive that's right. Yeah, Well, Millsy,

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're free. January twenty first, twenty twenty three, hit

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>us up because you've been talking about your wedding playlist.

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 1>Amy and I have been trying to work on a

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>playlist for your hen's party, and I think that this

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 1>will be a playlist that will only interest the three

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>of us because over our time we have like some

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>very trash music. One of then, I'm not it's not trash.

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say, it's not trash. One of

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 1>the songs possibilities that came up, which literally brought back

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>so many memories from me was Heidi montag song read

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>my Body Language. I actually when she played it to me.

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>It is a dead set bang of that song. There's

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>another really good one. What's the other one. There's a

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>secondary song that's about Spencer City lights or something good. Blackout, Blackout.

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, Amy was playing it. We were on a

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>walk and I literally couldn't stop myself from singing along

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>to it. That is so tragic. I would be so

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>embarrassed if anyone and you actually saw you out on

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a walk listening to Heidi Montaggon and singing talking about bangers.

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Amy put on that, so she shared a real her

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>pudding that played out for Nadia Bartel and there was

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of commentary around the Stephanie McIntosh song Mistake.

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I actually a couple of months ago added that to

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>my own playlist and it is a very good song

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that brings back so many memories. It's funny when you

0:05:55.880 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>try and sing along to that song and it's so high.

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can tell it's so being digitally done

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that her voice couldn't even reach those notes either. Yeah. Well,

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I would love if everyone in our Facebook community can

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>share the embarrassing songs that they like that they just

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:13.359
<v Speaker 1>stops him in their tracks and takes them back to

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>those certain moments in their life, even if they are

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>dorky songs like Strawberry Kisses or Mistake, and even maybe

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>some suggestions for what cage should walk down the aisle too. Yes,

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that would be actually very helpful if you could thank

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you again? Does that don't want to? Rumors are swelling

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that Shanne Grimman and her boyfriend Jacob Tompkins were once

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>part of an influencer love triangle. The DJ is believed

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to have been linked to Star Time before making things

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>official with Shanny Kate. How did this guss get out? Well,

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>this is all thanks to Ozzie influence her opinions. So

0:06:57.320 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>they were asked in a Q and A last week

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to share some juicy gossip people don't know, and they

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>did not disappoint so Ozzi Influencer Opinions responded to the

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Instagram story and said Shanne Grimman's boyfriend Jacob was seeing

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a well known influencer before he met Shanny. Shanny knew

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>he was seeing someone before she met him, but reached

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.679
<v Speaker 1>out to him anyway, and then in brackets Also, Shannee

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>actually knew the influencer personally too. Then Jacob met Shani,

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>he ghosted that influencer and started dating Shani in set

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Now Ozzi influencer opinions was flooded with followers asking for

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>more clues, to which she kindly obliged. She said the

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>influencer is a part of a family that is well

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>known on Instagram. She then shared a post that had

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a Star in the background and wrote, everyone is saying

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>either Hannah Orville Star Time and Lily Brown. One of

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>them is correct. Now, it seems like some followers were

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>still unable to cotton on to who it is, so

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>she reshared and said, you guys, surely the background here

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>gives it away, so clearly it was Star. I actually

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>hadn't heard much about Star before, So for those who

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>are in the same boat as me and don't know

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>who she is, she is Tammy Hembro's half sister. She

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>is twenty one years old and is an influencer in

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>her own right with two hundred and nine thousand followers,

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and she's currently studying environmental science and said she wants

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a marine biologist for some reason. That just

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of George Costanza, whose dream job was a

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>marine biologist. Well. Star also collaborated with her sisters on

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a capsule collection for Boohoo last year. And was also

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>part of a recent influencer giveaway for a Tesla. Now

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it gets very interesting me because I had a little

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>stalk of Starr's page and it seems like she has

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>moved on and she's not pining over Jacob because on

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Monday last week, she actually shared a photo of herself

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>with a mystery man with the caption we connect like

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Wi Fi. Now I did some further digging because it

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>seems to be my job on this podcast to stalk

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>all these influencers Instagram accounts, and Starr and Shani are

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>both following each other. However, Jacob and Starr do not

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>follow each other. That does make sense because in this situation,

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>if jake Yib's the one who is seeing Star, he

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:05.079
<v Speaker 1>is the one that owes her the respect of turning

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Shani away. I do think it's bad girl code though,

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>for Shany to go for Jacob if she knew that

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>he was, you know, starting out a relationship with Star. Well,

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>these are all rumors, and I do think that if

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 1>this is the case and Shani has you know, allegedly

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>stolen Jacob away, I mean, I don't know if you

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>can actually physically steal someone, it's their choice if they

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>want to go with you or not. It's kind of

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>big of Star to keep following Shani. I mean, they're

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>both influencers in their own right. Obviously Shany has a

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>bigger profile, but Star really is a very big part

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of an influencer family that is set to get a

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of attention with their upcoming reality show. You know,

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>they're the next Kardashians potentially, So it would be interesting

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to see if any of that type of rumors play

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>out on the show. I wonder if Jacob's kicking him myself.

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>He could have had a good role on this reality

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 1>TV show. It does interest me though, because initially when

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>this news broke, I think it was in January when

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>they first became public with their relationship. We did say

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>how this is a very good opportunity for Jacob, and

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>he has gone on to get a big following himself.

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>He's a DJ and a model, and of course dating

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>an influencer is going to be very advantageous for him.

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>So it does make me think a little bit maybe

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 1>we were right that he does want to position himself

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>next to influences, particularly if he was chasing after Star earlier.

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I got about fifty feet out. Suddenly the Greek beast

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>appeared before me. I tell you he was ten stories

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I have he was a foot. A strange calm came

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>over me. I don't know if it was divine intervention

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of the kinship of all living things, but I tell you, Jerry,

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>at that moment, I was a marine biologist. Police are

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>investigating disturbing footage a former Married at First Site bride

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Hailey Vernon leaning out of a moving convertible without a

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>seat belt on now. So if you for those who

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>have forgotten who Hailey was from maths, can you fill

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>us in well. Hailey is a former finance broker who

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.079
<v Speaker 1>appeared on Married at First Site last year Now. She

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>was described by Channel nine as a Dutze, straight talking

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>forced to be reckoned with and on the show she

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>opened up about her ten year struggle with drug addiction

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:08.719
<v Speaker 1>and how health and fitness pulled her out of a

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>very dark place. She was also the one where her

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>partner put her toothbrush in the toilet. Well. Since appearing

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>on the show, she has attracted over sixty two thousand

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>followers on Instagram and she has also become one of

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Australia's biggest names on Only Fans since joining the platform

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>last year. So last week her Only Fans career was

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>actually featured on Channel ten's new documentary called Mirror Mirror,

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>where Todd Sampson explored society's obsession with image and how

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it's exploited by the fitness, diet and pornography industries. I

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 1>would recommend going and checking that documentary out. It sounds sensational.

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 1>Hailey also recently revealed that she earned over six hundred

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars in the last twelve months on OnlyFans, and

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>she is now using that money to get into property development. Well, Zophie,

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I actually haven't seen this video on social media yet,

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>so what happened and why are police invested? Well? On Wednesday,

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>fellow Math's contestant a Van posted an Instagram story showing

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Hailey leaning out of the moving convertible without a seat

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>belt on. Now, she was filmed lifting her shirt up

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>as she danced well kind of grinded in the back seat,

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and she was literally stretching so far back that it

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>looked like she was about to slip out of the

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>car and fly into the car window behind her. Now

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a Varn was in the front passenger seat filming. At

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>first it looked as though he was actually driving, but

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>it has been confirmed he was in the passenger seat

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and the driver was not in the vision. Why do

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>these idiots put this stuff on Instagram? What do they

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.839
<v Speaker 1>think is going to happen, particularly in this day and

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>age where everyone's reporting everyone for doing the wrong thing.

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I know, it's actually insane because Hailey actually re shared

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 1>the Instagram so it was stupidity on both of their

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>parts to be sharing this. Now, the pair had actually

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>been whining and dining at a Broadbeach restaurant with a

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>well known Gold Coast real estate agent at the time.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Varn is also a real estate agent, and as I said,

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Haley is getting into property development. So people assume maybe

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>they had a meeting about an upcoming project they were

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 1>working on. But there was clearly a lot of alcohol

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 1>involved and consumed during the day. So did they keep

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the video online or has it since been deleted? Because

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you did say Haiti shed Yeah. Well, Avaughn eventually deleted

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the video after it was posted because he rightly so

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>got backlash, but it was up for enough time for

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Haley to reshare it on her own page. Now police

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>have confirmed they are looking into the video. A Queensland

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Police spokesman said on Thursday. Police are aware of a

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>video clip on social media and are working to establish

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the validity of the images and those involved. I mean,

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how difficult it is to determine the

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>validity of that video. I think it's good that the

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 1>police are looking into it. It will be interesting to see

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>if anything comes of it. And for those who aren't aware,

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Queensland law states that the driver and passengers must always

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>wear a seat belt while the car moving or stationary,

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>but not went part so they've obviously done the wrong thing.

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>And if you are caught not wearing a seat belt

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you can incur a fine of four hundred and thirteen dollars,

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>so not much of the only fans pay going away there. Yeah,

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I think she'll be able to afford that fine. Well,

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>it only comes after a van very narrowly held onto

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>his driver's license after he faced caught in New South

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Wales in March of this year with three counts of

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>using his mobile phone while driving in the car. Now

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>he pleaded guilty and was convicted of two offenses, while

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the third charge was dismissed. Now that left him with

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>ten demerit points instead of fifteen, which would have caused

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>immediate disqualification of his license. Geez, I would have thought

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>he'd lose more than five points. I know. Well. I

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's very lucky for him that he wasn't recorded

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>without a seat belt on as well. I mean, technically

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>he didn't do anything wrong in this video, but he

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>was encouraging someone to behave in that way. Why do

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>you think Australian influencers are one doing this but then

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>also feeling the need to post about it. It's very

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>strange behavior and it's very difficult to make sense what

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>is going on at the moment. It is a very

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>crazy time. Maybe it's something that they've always done, but

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>now that a lot of people are in lockdown, maybe

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>we have more time to be keeping an eye on

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing and finally holding them account for this

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>very poor behavior. Yeah. I do think it's also the fact,

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>like celeb spell check and Ozsie, Influencer Opinions page exists

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's some way that you can actually send them

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to get mass attention, because before it was just for

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that person's niche audience that would see that information. I

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>think that's all we have time for today. Thank you

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us for today's episode. If you

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>have enjoyed it, could you please make sure you are

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>subscribed to Outspoken And also, if you would like, can

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you leave us a five star review and rating. And

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>if you'd like to join in on the conversation, head

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>over to our Facebook group which has Outspoken the podcast community.