1 00:00:00,400 --> 00:00:02,480 Speaker 1: Now, as I mentioned a couple of moments ago, we 2 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:04,800 Speaker 1: know that that vision has emerged of the Chief Minister 3 00:00:04,880 --> 00:00:08,000 Speaker 1: being followed and heckled as she competed in the West 4 00:00:08,039 --> 00:00:11,920 Speaker 1: Max Monster on the weekend. Protesters followed her around the course, 5 00:00:12,520 --> 00:00:15,920 Speaker 1: actually waiting for her, setting up those different social media 6 00:00:15,960 --> 00:00:19,280 Speaker 1: opportunities for themselves. Now joining me on the line right 7 00:00:19,280 --> 00:00:21,440 Speaker 1: now is the Opposition leader Leah Finocchiaro. 8 00:00:21,560 --> 00:00:23,480 Speaker 2: Good morning to you, Leah. 9 00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:26,600 Speaker 3: Good morning Katie into your listeners, live from Tenant Creek. 10 00:00:26,720 --> 00:00:28,480 Speaker 1: Oh good to have you on the show, live from 11 00:00:28,520 --> 00:00:33,479 Speaker 1: Tenant Leah. Firstly, though, what did you make of the 12 00:00:33,560 --> 00:00:37,680 Speaker 1: situation with the Chief Minister over the weekend being followed 13 00:00:37,720 --> 00:00:41,159 Speaker 1: by protesters while on the course taking part in the 14 00:00:41,159 --> 00:00:42,440 Speaker 1: West Max Monster. 15 00:00:43,120 --> 00:00:45,160 Speaker 2: Is she fair game or is it a bridge too far? 16 00:00:46,240 --> 00:00:49,479 Speaker 3: No, I certainly don't condone that behavior. People, of course, 17 00:00:49,560 --> 00:00:53,200 Speaker 3: in our democratic society have the right and the ability 18 00:00:53,320 --> 00:00:57,480 Speaker 3: to protest, to raise their concerns, and there's many many 19 00:00:57,480 --> 00:00:59,960 Speaker 3: ways in which people can do that, But to harass 20 00:01:00,040 --> 00:01:02,480 Speaker 3: someone in the way that she was, nobody deserves that 21 00:01:02,680 --> 00:01:05,120 Speaker 3: and I certainly don't condone that behavior. 22 00:01:05,280 --> 00:01:06,959 Speaker 1: Yeah, look, I thought it was a bridge too far 23 00:01:07,040 --> 00:01:09,400 Speaker 1: as well. I just think that there's an element there 24 00:01:10,280 --> 00:01:12,920 Speaker 1: of a security issue given the fact that you're on 25 00:01:12,959 --> 00:01:16,600 Speaker 1: a course and being followed essentially by a group of 26 00:01:16,640 --> 00:01:19,560 Speaker 1: people to set up media opportunities. I can understand at 27 00:01:19,560 --> 00:01:22,400 Speaker 1: the end of that race having that protest and if 28 00:01:22,400 --> 00:01:24,080 Speaker 1: you want to have your voice heard then, but I 29 00:01:24,160 --> 00:01:26,240 Speaker 1: just thought it was a bridge too far in terms 30 00:01:26,240 --> 00:01:29,240 Speaker 1: of following her around and doing that. 31 00:01:30,360 --> 00:01:34,040 Speaker 3: Yeah, the level of harassment, but also, you know, not 32 00:01:34,520 --> 00:01:37,840 Speaker 3: just too Natasha Fars but also for the organizers and 33 00:01:37,920 --> 00:01:41,000 Speaker 3: the entire all of the participants of that race. You know, 34 00:01:41,040 --> 00:01:44,600 Speaker 3: it's not an appropriate time to bring down a wonderful 35 00:01:44,959 --> 00:01:48,440 Speaker 3: tourism event like that when you can raise your concerns 36 00:01:48,440 --> 00:01:49,840 Speaker 3: in other ways, and like you said, it could have 37 00:01:49,840 --> 00:01:52,200 Speaker 3: been done at the end of the race or you know, 38 00:01:52,320 --> 00:01:54,600 Speaker 3: a million other ways, Kate, how it was done is 39 00:01:54,600 --> 00:01:55,640 Speaker 3: certainly not appropriate. 40 00:01:56,120 --> 00:01:57,639 Speaker 2: Now, Leah on to another topic. 41 00:01:57,680 --> 00:02:00,320 Speaker 1: We spoke to Jerry Wood yesterday about what's see seems 42 00:02:00,360 --> 00:02:02,800 Speaker 1: to be a motion put to the Parliament last week 43 00:02:02,840 --> 00:02:06,400 Speaker 1: for an int voice to Parliament. I know that it's 44 00:02:06,680 --> 00:02:09,480 Speaker 1: the committee's basically going to be considering whether the body 45 00:02:10,120 --> 00:02:13,640 Speaker 1: to conduct these reviews is made up of Indigenous territorians 46 00:02:13,760 --> 00:02:18,080 Speaker 1: or an Assembly committee advised by First Nation people. LEA 47 00:02:18,840 --> 00:02:21,680 Speaker 1: talk us through your understanding of this and whether the 48 00:02:21,720 --> 00:02:22,960 Speaker 1: COLP supports it. 49 00:02:24,120 --> 00:02:26,280 Speaker 3: So all it is at the moment is that one 50 00:02:26,320 --> 00:02:29,399 Speaker 3: of the subcommittees of the Parliament, one of the scrutiny committees, 51 00:02:29,480 --> 00:02:33,960 Speaker 3: is going to be looking at what models could take 52 00:02:34,040 --> 00:02:38,640 Speaker 3: place to I guess have greater engagement of Aboriginal people 53 00:02:38,639 --> 00:02:41,600 Speaker 3: and how laws affect Aboriginal people. Now we have two 54 00:02:41,600 --> 00:02:44,760 Speaker 3: members on that committee and it's already an existing committee, 55 00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:46,160 Speaker 3: so they can look at a number of things, and 56 00:02:46,200 --> 00:02:48,360 Speaker 3: this is now something it will look at because the 57 00:02:48,400 --> 00:02:51,680 Speaker 3: Member of Malka has successfully got that motion through the 58 00:02:51,680 --> 00:02:54,120 Speaker 3: Parliament to look at it. So when I'm going to 59 00:02:54,160 --> 00:02:56,880 Speaker 3: prejudice the outcome, We're going to participate in good faith 60 00:02:57,000 --> 00:02:59,600 Speaker 3: like we do in all work of the Parliament. It's 61 00:02:59,600 --> 00:03:02,480 Speaker 3: a really important part of our democracy. And importantly, what 62 00:03:02,560 --> 00:03:05,040 Speaker 3: I want listeners to know is that you have an 63 00:03:05,080 --> 00:03:08,280 Speaker 3: opportunity to engage. And that's what's great about these committees 64 00:03:08,320 --> 00:03:11,760 Speaker 3: is that they will I'm sure, go out to public submission, 65 00:03:11,800 --> 00:03:15,560 Speaker 3: public consultation, whole public hearings and so that gives everyone 66 00:03:15,680 --> 00:03:18,840 Speaker 3: interested in this not only an opportunity to have your say, 67 00:03:18,880 --> 00:03:21,840 Speaker 3: but an opportunity to listen and really openly engage in 68 00:03:21,840 --> 00:03:24,040 Speaker 3: the process. If it's something you're keen on or not 69 00:03:24,160 --> 00:03:26,560 Speaker 3: keen on, but want to know about it, you'll be 70 00:03:26,600 --> 00:03:29,320 Speaker 3: able to keep a close eye and be involved. 71 00:03:29,400 --> 00:03:31,760 Speaker 1: Leah, when we spoke to Jerry Wood on the show yesterday, 72 00:03:31,800 --> 00:03:33,520 Speaker 1: I like to have a catch up with Jerry because 73 00:03:33,560 --> 00:03:36,520 Speaker 1: he's got a wealth of experience, you know, nineteen years 74 00:03:36,520 --> 00:03:40,000 Speaker 1: in parliament. He told us we should just reintroduce those 75 00:03:40,040 --> 00:03:42,680 Speaker 1: scrutiny committees. Do you think that that would be a 76 00:03:42,680 --> 00:03:43,200 Speaker 1: better option. 77 00:03:44,520 --> 00:03:47,040 Speaker 3: Well, we know that Labor came to power and promise 78 00:03:47,120 --> 00:03:49,280 Speaker 3: to be open and transparent, and of course we sort 79 00:03:49,360 --> 00:03:53,280 Speaker 3: of abolish the Legislative Scrutiny Committee, which is very disappointing 80 00:03:53,320 --> 00:03:55,480 Speaker 3: because it looked at I think it made about thirty 81 00:03:55,520 --> 00:03:58,720 Speaker 3: three reports to the Parliament on various pieces of legislation, 82 00:03:58,800 --> 00:04:00,880 Speaker 3: and I had the privilege of being on one of 83 00:04:00,880 --> 00:04:04,480 Speaker 3: those committees and it was certainly a really good process 84 00:04:04,480 --> 00:04:06,840 Speaker 3: for members of the public. But like I said, we're 85 00:04:06,880 --> 00:04:09,120 Speaker 3: not going to prejudice the outcome. This committee is now 86 00:04:09,160 --> 00:04:12,640 Speaker 3: looking at it. We will participate in that fully and 87 00:04:12,720 --> 00:04:16,120 Speaker 3: look at the recommendations and ultimately, once that committee has 88 00:04:16,200 --> 00:04:19,359 Speaker 3: formed its recommendations, really either support them or will do 89 00:04:19,400 --> 00:04:22,200 Speaker 3: a dissenting report and explain why we don't support them, 90 00:04:22,200 --> 00:04:25,039 Speaker 3: so people will understand really clearly where we stand when 91 00:04:25,040 --> 00:04:25,960 Speaker 3: that time comes. 92 00:04:25,760 --> 00:04:26,440 Speaker 2: Around, Lea. 93 00:04:26,440 --> 00:04:28,839 Speaker 1: If it does get to the point where the COLP 94 00:04:29,080 --> 00:04:31,520 Speaker 1: does support this going forward, do you think it will 95 00:04:31,520 --> 00:04:33,920 Speaker 1: cause issues within the party given that you have got 96 00:04:34,400 --> 00:04:36,719 Speaker 1: some elements within the CLP at the moment, some that 97 00:04:36,760 --> 00:04:39,360 Speaker 1: have voted to oppose the Federal Voice to Parliament. 98 00:04:40,360 --> 00:04:42,920 Speaker 3: Well, I think the Federal Voice to Parliament is quite 99 00:04:43,040 --> 00:04:45,400 Speaker 3: different to this, But again none of the detail has 100 00:04:45,440 --> 00:04:49,120 Speaker 3: sort of been gone through. But all really as a 101 00:04:49,400 --> 00:04:52,159 Speaker 3: territory that we're focusing on is that better level of 102 00:04:52,200 --> 00:04:56,000 Speaker 3: engagement and understanding of impact. But again I don't know 103 00:04:56,000 --> 00:04:57,520 Speaker 3: what the committee is going to look at. I don't 104 00:04:57,520 --> 00:04:59,960 Speaker 3: know what the recommendations are going to be, but when 105 00:05:00,080 --> 00:05:03,200 Speaker 3: that time comes around, will certainly make sure people understand 106 00:05:03,200 --> 00:05:05,400 Speaker 3: what our position is, which includes the party. 107 00:05:05,480 --> 00:05:08,560 Speaker 2: All right, we'll keep an eye on things now, Lea. 108 00:05:08,720 --> 00:05:11,359 Speaker 1: Last week I spoke to the Prime Minister and questioned 109 00:05:11,400 --> 00:05:13,720 Speaker 1: him about the issues that we're facing in the Northern. 110 00:05:13,520 --> 00:05:15,040 Speaker 2: Territory around crime. 111 00:05:15,640 --> 00:05:18,840 Speaker 1: Anthony Albinizi said, we don't need federal police called into 112 00:05:18,839 --> 00:05:21,760 Speaker 1: the Northern Territory to assist local police. 113 00:05:22,080 --> 00:05:23,520 Speaker 2: LEA, do you think the federal. 114 00:05:23,200 --> 00:05:26,400 Speaker 1: Government's doing enough to assist with the issues around crime 115 00:05:26,440 --> 00:05:27,200 Speaker 1: in the territory? 116 00:05:28,200 --> 00:05:31,080 Speaker 3: No, I don't. I really thought his comments were extraordinary. 117 00:05:31,120 --> 00:05:33,520 Speaker 3: He also couldn't bring himself to say there was a 118 00:05:33,560 --> 00:05:36,680 Speaker 3: police crisis, despite the fact that one of his own 119 00:05:36,880 --> 00:05:40,359 Speaker 3: labor colleagues have said that there is a crime crisis 120 00:05:40,360 --> 00:05:43,479 Speaker 3: which we all know about. The Australian Federal Police could 121 00:05:43,480 --> 00:05:46,640 Speaker 3: have a really key role in supporting Territory police. It's 122 00:05:46,680 --> 00:05:49,920 Speaker 3: something we've called for for many many months now, Katie. 123 00:05:50,080 --> 00:05:53,279 Speaker 3: We see there'd be great opportunities, particularly in places like 124 00:05:53,360 --> 00:05:57,479 Speaker 3: Alice Springs, where the Fed Police could possibly be the 125 00:05:57,640 --> 00:06:00,880 Speaker 3: in the city, allowing Territory police to be out in 126 00:06:00,880 --> 00:06:04,200 Speaker 3: the suburbs and out in the regions providing different levels 127 00:06:04,240 --> 00:06:07,040 Speaker 3: of support. There's so many things that could be done. 128 00:06:07,080 --> 00:06:09,760 Speaker 3: But what we know that the Prime Minister did say 129 00:06:10,000 --> 00:06:13,359 Speaker 3: is that there's been no request from the territory to 130 00:06:13,440 --> 00:06:17,120 Speaker 3: have a stand So it comes back to Natasha Files 131 00:06:17,120 --> 00:06:20,320 Speaker 3: not asking for the support that we need for our police, 132 00:06:20,440 --> 00:06:23,320 Speaker 3: who we know, are overworked and under resourced. 133 00:06:23,720 --> 00:06:25,360 Speaker 2: Do you feel us those things are? 134 00:06:25,680 --> 00:06:27,560 Speaker 1: You know, I hardly want to say it because I 135 00:06:27,560 --> 00:06:29,440 Speaker 1: don't want to sort of jinx this, but do you 136 00:06:29,480 --> 00:06:32,120 Speaker 1: feel us those things are a little bit quieter at 137 00:06:32,120 --> 00:06:35,680 Speaker 1: the moment on the crime front, No. 138 00:06:35,800 --> 00:06:38,839 Speaker 3: I definitely don't. I'm down here in Tenant Creek speaking 139 00:06:38,839 --> 00:06:41,760 Speaker 3: with people. But of course we've had, you know, seven 140 00:06:41,800 --> 00:06:45,400 Speaker 3: stabbings in eight weeks up in you know, across the territory, 141 00:06:45,440 --> 00:06:48,520 Speaker 3: and stuff in Nallae Springs is happening every single day 142 00:06:48,560 --> 00:06:51,520 Speaker 3: that people are just horrifying over We know people are 143 00:06:51,600 --> 00:06:54,400 Speaker 3: leaving town. I was speaking to someone yesterday, I wanted 144 00:06:54,480 --> 00:06:57,159 Speaker 3: a business owner here and they had a friend who 145 00:06:57,279 --> 00:06:59,320 Speaker 3: had woke up and there were four or five people 146 00:06:59,640 --> 00:07:01,680 Speaker 3: in here house. And he's a long term territory and 147 00:07:01,680 --> 00:07:03,640 Speaker 3: he said, that's it, that's enough for me. I'm gone. 148 00:07:04,279 --> 00:07:07,400 Speaker 3: And so he's leaving the territory. And that's an all 149 00:07:07,480 --> 00:07:11,840 Speaker 3: too common story. Unfortunately. Until we strengthen the laws and 150 00:07:11,880 --> 00:07:15,080 Speaker 3: support our police like the CLPS tried to do seven 151 00:07:15,120 --> 00:07:19,760 Speaker 3: times in Parliament, this crime severity is going to continue 152 00:07:19,800 --> 00:07:22,400 Speaker 3: to escalate and how many more people have to lose 153 00:07:22,440 --> 00:07:25,240 Speaker 3: their lives? Before this government does something about it. 154 00:07:25,360 --> 00:07:28,120 Speaker 1: Now, Leir, I know you are intenant, as you've just mentioned, 155 00:07:28,920 --> 00:07:32,000 Speaker 1: and I understand that well. The government did recently announce 156 00:07:32,040 --> 00:07:36,520 Speaker 1: eleven million dollars for the fieries, including another position there. 157 00:07:37,080 --> 00:07:39,239 Speaker 1: Have you spoken to the fireries how things going. 158 00:07:40,520 --> 00:07:43,720 Speaker 3: Well, Certainly we're really concerned about fireries right across the 159 00:07:43,800 --> 00:07:47,200 Speaker 3: territory because what we're hearing pretty clearly, especially on the 160 00:07:47,240 --> 00:07:50,280 Speaker 3: ground here in Tenant Creek, is that the positions aren't filled. 161 00:07:50,320 --> 00:07:53,440 Speaker 3: So my understanding, Katie, is that here in Tenant Creek 162 00:07:53,440 --> 00:07:56,280 Speaker 3: there are supposed to be three full time fire positions. 163 00:07:56,680 --> 00:07:59,360 Speaker 3: All of them are currently being filled as fly and 164 00:07:59,400 --> 00:08:00,480 Speaker 3: fly out of Darwin. 165 00:08:01,280 --> 00:08:04,600 Speaker 1: So there's no full time there's no full time firies 166 00:08:04,600 --> 00:08:06,000 Speaker 1: based in Tenant Creek right now. 167 00:08:06,640 --> 00:08:08,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right, And my understanding is that there is 168 00:08:09,000 --> 00:08:11,000 Speaker 3: a lot of that right across the territory and that 169 00:08:11,400 --> 00:08:14,440 Speaker 3: possibly only the norm Boys station is the only station 170 00:08:14,520 --> 00:08:18,080 Speaker 3: that has its full complement of fireries, which clearly puts 171 00:08:18,280 --> 00:08:21,239 Speaker 3: life and property at risk. It shows that this government 172 00:08:21,280 --> 00:08:25,200 Speaker 3: hasn't been recruiting and again resourcing our fire services, much 173 00:08:25,360 --> 00:08:28,000 Speaker 3: like it hasn't been keeping up with what we need 174 00:08:28,040 --> 00:08:32,080 Speaker 3: for policing. So this is a real failure on emergency 175 00:08:32,120 --> 00:08:35,560 Speaker 3: response by the files government to address the very basic 176 00:08:35,640 --> 00:08:37,839 Speaker 3: needs of a community, which is a strong police force 177 00:08:37,840 --> 00:08:39,040 Speaker 3: and a strong fire service. 178 00:08:39,080 --> 00:08:41,040 Speaker 1: So what needs to happen here if we don't if 179 00:08:41,040 --> 00:08:42,920 Speaker 1: we've got a five fo. 180 00:08:42,760 --> 00:08:44,600 Speaker 2: Fierries into Tenant Creek, what needs to. 181 00:08:44,600 --> 00:08:49,520 Speaker 3: Happen, Well, we need to be recruiting more fire firemen 182 00:08:49,600 --> 00:08:52,360 Speaker 3: and women. We need to also settle their pay deal. 183 00:08:52,400 --> 00:08:55,720 Speaker 3: I mean that is still outstanding for the fieries that 184 00:08:55,800 --> 00:08:58,760 Speaker 3: this government has not been able to negotiate with them, 185 00:08:59,320 --> 00:09:02,480 Speaker 3: you know, following the disastrous public service pay frees, and 186 00:09:02,559 --> 00:09:06,280 Speaker 3: so that still hangs in limbo, which is I'm sure 187 00:09:06,320 --> 00:09:09,160 Speaker 3: a great deterrent for people. And I've got no doubt 188 00:09:09,160 --> 00:09:12,000 Speaker 3: that people are leaving the fire service because of it. 189 00:09:12,080 --> 00:09:16,600 Speaker 3: And ultimately, until this government does that deal, starts to 190 00:09:16,679 --> 00:09:19,400 Speaker 3: make sure that it can provide the right resourcing by 191 00:09:19,440 --> 00:09:22,679 Speaker 3: having enough recruits and making sure that the territory is 192 00:09:22,679 --> 00:09:25,440 Speaker 3: a great place to live, because don't forget, fires and 193 00:09:25,440 --> 00:09:28,439 Speaker 3: police are like everybody else. They don't like crime. They 194 00:09:28,440 --> 00:09:30,560 Speaker 3: want to live somewhere safe with their family and have 195 00:09:30,720 --> 00:09:32,880 Speaker 3: a good career and a good opportunity and If this 196 00:09:32,960 --> 00:09:36,560 Speaker 3: government can't address all of those issues, including cost of living, 197 00:09:36,880 --> 00:09:39,360 Speaker 3: we'll continue to see people leave and that will continue 198 00:09:39,400 --> 00:09:41,120 Speaker 3: to put strain on our fire services. 199 00:09:41,200 --> 00:09:43,920 Speaker 1: Now, Leah, before I let you go, a Facebook post 200 00:09:43,960 --> 00:09:48,040 Speaker 1: over the weekend from you certainly well got tongues wagging. 201 00:09:48,720 --> 00:09:51,280 Speaker 1: People were talking about the fact that this post had 202 00:09:51,320 --> 00:09:56,240 Speaker 1: gone up from the Police Auxiliary recruit graduation on Friday. 203 00:09:56,559 --> 00:10:00,040 Speaker 1: You'd post a group photos but had blurred out the 204 00:10:00,080 --> 00:10:04,080 Speaker 1: Police Minister Kate Warden and said in that post that 205 00:10:04,160 --> 00:10:07,240 Speaker 1: she didn't agree to being part of those posts. 206 00:10:07,679 --> 00:10:08,720 Speaker 2: What's going on. 207 00:10:09,880 --> 00:10:13,720 Speaker 3: Oh Katie, It's really reached a new level of low 208 00:10:13,920 --> 00:10:17,560 Speaker 3: when it comes to this government. I've attended many police 209 00:10:17,600 --> 00:10:22,319 Speaker 3: graduations with the Police Minister, gosh, tons of them, and 210 00:10:22,679 --> 00:10:26,040 Speaker 3: there's always a group photo. There's always the Police Minister, 211 00:10:26,120 --> 00:10:29,320 Speaker 3: always presents an award to the best recruit, and there's 212 00:10:29,320 --> 00:10:32,920 Speaker 3: always family and friends there taking photos, just like I'm 213 00:10:32,960 --> 00:10:35,800 Speaker 3: there with my staff taking photos as well, so that 214 00:10:35,840 --> 00:10:38,920 Speaker 3: we can congratulate and honor people who've just reached one 215 00:10:38,960 --> 00:10:42,480 Speaker 3: of the most important days in their life, getting their 216 00:10:42,520 --> 00:10:45,200 Speaker 3: badge of service to serve and protect as part of 217 00:10:45,200 --> 00:10:49,160 Speaker 3: the police force. And the Police Minister after the service, 218 00:10:49,200 --> 00:10:51,920 Speaker 3: didn't come and speak to me, she bailed up one 219 00:10:51,960 --> 00:10:54,760 Speaker 3: of my staff, which is highly inappropriate for a government 220 00:10:54,800 --> 00:10:57,680 Speaker 3: minister to do that, and said that she did not 221 00:10:57,800 --> 00:11:00,920 Speaker 3: consent to any photos of her being on Facebook. Now 222 00:11:00,960 --> 00:11:04,240 Speaker 3: I really wanted to highlight, of course, the graduating squad, 223 00:11:04,320 --> 00:11:07,280 Speaker 3: as I do every single time, so I had no 224 00:11:07,440 --> 00:11:10,520 Speaker 3: choice but to blow her out and of course then 225 00:11:10,559 --> 00:11:13,520 Speaker 3: make comment expressing her design not to be in the photo. 226 00:11:13,559 --> 00:11:16,320 Speaker 2: How's it childish of you to put that post up? 227 00:11:17,480 --> 00:11:17,680 Speaker 1: Well? 228 00:11:18,080 --> 00:11:21,360 Speaker 3: No, because how can we not honor and reward and 229 00:11:21,520 --> 00:11:25,600 Speaker 3: congratulate our hard working recruits who've just graduated and gotten 230 00:11:25,640 --> 00:11:28,640 Speaker 3: their badge to serve and protect. So it doesn't. 231 00:11:28,480 --> 00:11:31,199 Speaker 1: Detract though, I guess so if that's the aim, you know, 232 00:11:31,400 --> 00:11:33,520 Speaker 1: post putting that post up, and I understand it, and 233 00:11:33,520 --> 00:11:35,640 Speaker 1: I understand what you're saying. But putting that post up 234 00:11:35,679 --> 00:11:40,120 Speaker 1: doesn't it detract from those recruits? Well? 235 00:11:40,360 --> 00:11:42,160 Speaker 3: I think what it does is show you just how 236 00:11:42,200 --> 00:11:45,119 Speaker 3: pathetic the police minister is, and that the person detracting 237 00:11:45,200 --> 00:11:48,360 Speaker 3: from the recruits is her, because she's more worried about 238 00:11:48,520 --> 00:11:51,040 Speaker 3: where her photo may or may not end up than 239 00:11:51,120 --> 00:11:54,359 Speaker 3: she is about congratulating the squad. I mean how extraordinary 240 00:11:54,400 --> 00:11:57,640 Speaker 3: for a police minister not to want to appear in 241 00:11:57,760 --> 00:12:00,600 Speaker 3: the graduating squad photo. I mean, this photo will be 242 00:12:01,240 --> 00:12:04,480 Speaker 3: on everyone's mantle pieces on the walls of the Police College, 243 00:12:04,840 --> 00:12:06,480 Speaker 3: and she doesn't want to be part of it. 244 00:12:06,520 --> 00:12:09,680 Speaker 1: But so was it just the photo that your photographer 245 00:12:09,720 --> 00:12:12,800 Speaker 1: had taken, all the photos that everybody had taken. 246 00:12:13,720 --> 00:12:16,079 Speaker 3: Well, I only know that she barrowed up to one 247 00:12:16,120 --> 00:12:18,600 Speaker 3: of my staff and expressed to them that she didn't 248 00:12:18,640 --> 00:12:21,360 Speaker 3: consent to it being on my Facebook page. But you know, 249 00:12:21,440 --> 00:12:24,240 Speaker 3: this is a public celebration of people who've just spent 250 00:12:24,400 --> 00:12:27,040 Speaker 3: weeks and weeks and weeks at the training college, and 251 00:12:27,080 --> 00:12:28,959 Speaker 3: I wasn't not going to put a photo up of 252 00:12:29,040 --> 00:12:30,040 Speaker 3: the graduating squad. 253 00:12:30,120 --> 00:12:32,320 Speaker 1: Look, I get that, and I can understand it from 254 00:12:32,360 --> 00:12:35,760 Speaker 1: your perspective. I guess, you know, from her perspective. She said, 255 00:12:35,800 --> 00:12:38,760 Speaker 1: I saw the reply on your Facebook page where she'd said, 256 00:12:38,760 --> 00:12:40,880 Speaker 1: you know that she didn't consent to your photographer sort 257 00:12:40,880 --> 00:12:42,800 Speaker 1: of being up in her face. I don't know whether 258 00:12:42,800 --> 00:12:44,920 Speaker 1: that was or wasn't the case, but I guess for 259 00:12:45,040 --> 00:12:47,760 Speaker 1: me what it demonstrated is I thought to myself, if 260 00:12:47,760 --> 00:12:50,000 Speaker 1: you two can't sort of have a discussion about this 261 00:12:50,160 --> 00:12:52,840 Speaker 1: photo and about this post, you know, on the side 262 00:12:52,960 --> 00:12:56,320 Speaker 1: rather than on social media. Can we expect our leaders, 263 00:12:56,400 --> 00:12:59,440 Speaker 1: you know you and the Minister for Police to be 264 00:12:59,480 --> 00:13:02,880 Speaker 1: able to have some of those more difficult discussions with 265 00:13:02,960 --> 00:13:04,880 Speaker 1: each other about things like crime. 266 00:13:06,040 --> 00:13:08,320 Speaker 3: Well, I was very disappointed she didn't raise it with me, 267 00:13:08,440 --> 00:13:11,880 Speaker 3: but please let me clarify that my young staff member 268 00:13:12,160 --> 00:13:15,760 Speaker 3: was nowhere near the police minister. In fact, he was 269 00:13:15,880 --> 00:13:19,400 Speaker 3: meeters away from the official photographer who was meeters away 270 00:13:19,480 --> 00:13:22,520 Speaker 3: from the police minister. There is no up in her 271 00:13:22,559 --> 00:13:27,080 Speaker 3: face whatsoever, and ultimately she's something she should have raised 272 00:13:27,120 --> 00:13:29,680 Speaker 3: with me. But either way, to not want to appear 273 00:13:29,720 --> 00:13:32,480 Speaker 3: in a photo on Facebook for a police graduation, I 274 00:13:32,520 --> 00:13:34,360 Speaker 3: think is all new low for this government. 275 00:13:35,000 --> 00:13:38,280 Speaker 1: Well, opposition leader Leah Fanocchiaro, I know plenty of people 276 00:13:38,480 --> 00:13:41,200 Speaker 1: have opinions about that, as they do about the situation 277 00:13:41,440 --> 00:13:44,760 Speaker 1: with well with the what somemer seeing as that second 278 00:13:44,840 --> 00:13:47,840 Speaker 1: tier of a voice here in the Northern territory, and 279 00:13:47,960 --> 00:13:51,560 Speaker 1: also about the situation involving the Chief Minister on the 280 00:13:51,559 --> 00:13:55,720 Speaker 1: West Max Monster. As always, I appreciate your time. Thank 281 00:13:55,760 --> 00:13:58,000 Speaker 1: you very much for joining us this morning. From Tenant Craig. 282 00:13:58,840 --> 00:14:00,560 Speaker 3: Thank you everyone, Take care, thank you,