WEBVTT - Melbourne Night Club Slammed For Using Animals As Props,  Leave Ruby Tuesday Matthews Alone & Royal TikTok

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Before we get into the episode, we want to issue

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a trigger warning as we do discuss issues around animal

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:09.879
<v Speaker 1>cruelty as well as eating disorders. On today's show, a

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Melbourne nightclub is slammed for using animals as props. Ruby Tuesday,

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Matthews calls out influencer watchdog account for body shaming her

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and how TikTok is helping the monarchy remain relevant. Hello

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to Outspoken. It's your dose of the hottest influencer.

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 2>And pop culture news twice a week.

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Okay, Torbert, and I'm getting very excited because Sophie,

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you may be my Hills neighbor soon. Yeah, I'm getting

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>ahead of myself. It's the first time my partner and

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I have ever made an offer on a house, so

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm already picturing myself in this house. I'm becoming a

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>new person, a Hills person, because I live forty minutes

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>away from U Kate, so you've been very eager to

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>try and get me in your area. That being said,

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I think there might be other people interested in this

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>house that we have to beat out.

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Look, i think I'm going to be more disappointed for

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 2>you if this offer is not approved.

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>We actually walked past the house the other day and

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately it was pissing with rain. But I realized I've

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 1>become such an old person because I was noticing all

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the beautiful trees on the street. Well, it's just such

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a nightmare of a time to be looking for a

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>house because the interest rates are through the roof. So

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel in a very privileged position that we're even

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>able to put an offer on a house at the moment.

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>But it's yeah, I'm getting really excited, but I feel

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>like I'm in for a bit of a fall.

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 2>We'll see. We'll keep you updated.

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty funny because our parents went and had a

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>look at the house over the weekend, and they're so

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>weird because they give the real estate agents a fake name. Well,

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the worst thing is that Mum came and looked at

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the house with me a couple of weeks ago, so

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>they already know it's her. They said, ohso are you

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>looking for someone else.

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 2>And she's like, oh, yeah, Mum's.

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Mum's strategy is that she will point out everything that's

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>wrong with the house.

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Because when Dale and I were looking.

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>We'd walk into this house and she'd be like, there's

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a crack and this is shit and this is terrible.

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 2>And then we'd walk out and she go, I love it.

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 2>You're like, well I thought you had.

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>She rode a pros and cons this for this other

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>house that was near me, and I'm like, why are

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you running all the cow I'm sensing it's time to

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>leave my rental because we've got some new neighbors and

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>they're lovely people, but they constantly have their garage door

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>up anytime I'm out the front. Oh hello, you know,

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 1>there's all these times are you're going to have a conversation.

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I just want to get something in my car, So

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>basically they're just waiting in the garage to talk to you. Yeah,

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that is the difficulty with being friends with your neighborhood

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>because I'm on a street where everyone's really nice and

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like kind of like a Ramsey Street atmosphere, but

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>it's almost annoying because sometimes you just want to pop

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>out of your house and go straight to the car

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and not speak to anyone. But you're on the hills

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>where the houses are sort of far apart. I'm in

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a townhouse situation when we share a war with these

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 1>people and it's just I'm over it.

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 2>I've got to get.

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Out of it. Yeah.

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a sign that you need to leave.

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 2>But two rights don't make your rights absolutely.

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Two rights don't make it wrong. Correct, two rights wrong. Yes.

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Melbourne night club Two Wrongs has come under fire for

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>using animals as props during their relaunch event on Saturday Night.

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Olivia Rodgers' new boyfriend, Morgan Waterhouse's pr agency is facing

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>criticism for the activation after organizing the exclusive, invite only event. Now, So,

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>for those who aren't from Melbourne, can you explain more

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>about this venue yet? So? Two Wrongs is a restaurant

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and a cocktail bar located on Chapel Street.

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 2>I would also describe.

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>It as a nightclub. It has a DJ and also

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a huge dance floor. Now. Isaac Constantine and Zachary Riggs

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>are the founders of the venue. They also run a

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>string of other venues in Melbourne. Two Wrongs appears to

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>have been operating since twenty fifteen, but has undergone a

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>rebrand so. The new branding includes Japanese writing in the

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:50.119
<v Speaker 1>logo and the menu is described as having a Japanese fusion.

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>The rebrand is said to be inspired by the epic

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>battle of c and space whatever that means, and the

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>venue has been reimagined into the depths of underwater Neo

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Tokyo now. The owners were interviewed back in twenty fifteen

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>about the venue and they said that people take things

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>so seriously in Melbourne in regards to hospitality, and they

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>like to have a lot of fun with their venues.

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 1>He said they want to also provide a grungy experience

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>for their patrons while having a laugh too, explaining that

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>two Wrongs is for those who appreciate style and class,

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>as well as the option of playing Nintendo while you

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>wait for a table. Now. The venue also controversially back

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>in twenty fifteen promoted itself as having an all male

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>bartending lineup. Now, Olivia Rogers's new boyfriend, Morgan Waterhouse is

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>at the heart of this unfolding controversy.

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 2>That's right, Kate, So just for some.

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Background, Olivia officially debuted her relationship with Morgan back in April,

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>following weeks of speculation. Rumors are the couple actually started

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>dating back in December twenty twenty two, just a few

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>months after her shock split from her ex husband Justin

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>mckainn In October. Now, since Hard launching their relationship, Morgan

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>is a regular fixture on Olivia's Instagram. They recently attended

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Australian Fashion Week together and they have shared their adventures

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>on a number of brand trips. Now, as well as

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>modeling and creating content, Morgan runs a PR agency called

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Champagne Leila Now. The business doesn't have a website, which

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>is actually really odd for a PR agency, but it

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 1>does have an Instagram account and has a following of

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>nine thousand on Instagram. The business describes itself as specializing

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>in luxury PR, event hosting, VIP liaison and private parties.

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>It also states that it partners with exclusive venues, restaurants, bars,

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>events and brands across Australia. On his agency's Instagram, it

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>said this Saturday, twenty seventh of the fifth We Go

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>japan Now, whoever posted this, I think it is Morgan

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>chose to use Japanese characters for the word Japan, so

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I think he meant to write this Saturday, we Go Japanese.

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>The post continued, Lila takes on a collaboration with one

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>of our all time favorites. If you know, you know,

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>strictly invite only Now. This was accompanied by a carousel

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>of very grungy photos of Japanese men and women either

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>smoking or giving the finger. The launch event was attended

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>by a sea of Melbourne influencers, predominantly micro influencers, and

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to my absolute horror, the venue had reptiles at the

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>launch event for guests to pass around and take photos of.

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I was pretty taken aback when I saw this online now.

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>It appeared to be a pr activation that Morgan Waterhouse's

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>company had set up, as he was really front and

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 1>center with the reptiles. So large snakes as well as

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>crocodiles were being used as gimmicks and being casually passed

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>around like props for influencers to take photos and videos

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>with to promote the venue. It was as though the

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>animals were being used as accessories. It was really gross.

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Another Instagram story shows a bald man with a baby

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>crocodile draped over his head while two people are taking

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>photos of him. This man is in fact the owner

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of the business that supplied the reptiles to the nightclub.

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>So he is a Melbourne identity who goes by the

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>name of Snake Man. His real name is Raymond Hoser

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 1>We will touch on his reaction to this controversy later.

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>It's quite disturbing that this man is actually the owner

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of the reptiles and that's how he wants to treat them.

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Public is setting the tone for how the rest of

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the patrons are going to react to the animals. When

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I first saw this image of Morgan Waterhouse with the crocodile,

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought, is he over in Bali or something. And

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I was shocked to hear that this was actually a

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>venue in Melbourne because even in the videos you can

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>hear the music is absolutely pumping. Surely these animals are petrified.

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I just felt so sorry for them. There is a

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of confusion with snakes because a lot of people

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>assume they're deaf because they don't have exterior ears.

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 2>But I did some.

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Research into it, and they have two auditory pathways that

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>enable them to detect sounds as vibrations through the air

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and in the ground. Experts say the snakes are very

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.679
<v Speaker 1>sensitive to loud noises and it can cause stress in snakes,

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>which can lead to major health problems. It's similar for crocodiles.

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>A lot of loud noises cause stress, and crocodiles actually

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>have excellent hearing, so it can also lead to the

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>crocodile being aggressive if there's a lot of loud noise.

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>And I'm assuming the flashing lights wouldn't have been great

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>for these animals either. They would have been absolutely petrified.

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Not to mention that everyone was getting free drinks, so

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>they were probably drunk when they're handling the animals. It's

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>not like you're going to be very careful with them

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>in that situation. It does worry me having animals in

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>these sorts of environments because you don't know if animals

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>are being fed these drinks or the food that's around

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the place. It doesn't appear to be much care was

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>being taken with them. I wonder what insurance this company

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>has because I know with petting zoos that go to

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>different parties like kids parties, they have different liabilities and

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>also the venue liabilities as well. And also I've heard

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that it's really hard to get insurance, especially if those

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>animals and a petting zoo are around drunk people. Yeah,

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't been a good couple of days for two

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 1>wrongs because in addition to this animal controversy, the nightclub

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>has also been accused of cultural appropriation with a number

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of staff dressed as geishas. So, for those who don't know,

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Geishas are Japanese performers who are trained in traditional Japanese

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>performing art styles like dance, music, and singing. They're also

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>known for being proficient hosts, so it's unclear if the

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>workers dressed as Geishas were Japanese or workers appropriating the culture. Now.

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.559
<v Speaker 1>We first sparked discussion in our Facebook community on Sunday

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>night about this event, and consequently it was picked up

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>by Ozzie influencer Opinions and also Tea Time with members

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>absolutely outraged by these photos and many found the images

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>very distressing and enraging. Now. Two Wrongs page became flooded

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>with negative comments after this. One user wrote passing around

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>animals in a bar is just cruel, great rebrand, while

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>another wrote cultural appropriation to promote your club is one thing,

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>but using animals as a prop to be passed around

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>is fucking gross. Yuck. Now. In response to the backlash,

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Two Wrongs quickly untagged all the Instagram stories which featured

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the reptiles. Unfortunately, Morgan Waterhouse didn't appear to get the memo,

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>so his PR agency still had the Instagram stories with

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the animals up. He is on a trip at the moment,

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a sponsored trip with Olivia Rodgers, so I don't know

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>if the messages were coming through. Now Olivia wasn't at

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>this event though, was she No, but her best friend

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and stylist Paul Versaci, who actually introduced Olivia and Morgan,

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>he was at the event, which surprised me. The rest

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of the influencers there was pretty much made up of

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of micro influencers. There weren't too many big

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>names that I recognized. And now you said Paul was there,

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>but he was also photographed with the snake around his neck,

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.079
<v Speaker 1>which wasn't a good look for him. It definitely wasn't. Now,

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>prominent animal protection group called Community Representations of Crocodiles is

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>calling for an investigation into the incident. Now. This is

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a group that is supported by Bob Irwin. A spokesperson

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>for the group slammed it as irresponsible and said nature

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 1>protection rules need to be updated to combat wildlife interactions

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>in social media. Now, another prominent animal actor, Bailey Mason,

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>who goes by the name Warrior for Animals, also called

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 1>out the venue. Now, you may have heard of Bailey

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.959
<v Speaker 1>because he's got fifteen thousand followers, and he sparked global

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>anger about live dolphins being used in avatar II promotions,

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.559
<v Speaker 1>so he actually contacted Two Wrongs directly about what he

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>called animal cruelty and exploitation. So a spokesperson for the

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>venue responded, writing, Hey, Bailey, thank you for the message.

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.199
<v Speaker 1>We did our due diligence with the animal events company

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and they ensured the environment was safe. But we take

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 1>your feedback very seriously, and upon reflection on the event,

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>we will not be having animals in the bar for

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>future events like these. I appreciate the amicable message, Bailey,

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 1>Please consider this event as a lesson learned. I scroll

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>through your page and support all the work and love

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:45.959
<v Speaker 1>you put into animal safety.

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 2>What does everyone think of the response?

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think it's pretty good for a private message.

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming the owner thought it may be shared publicly,

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>so that's why he wrote such a good message back.

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's an okay message, but I think that

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>there needs to be an official statement put out by

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Two Wrongs. Is now a lot of press attention around

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:06.719
<v Speaker 1>this story. I am wondering whether Morgan's PR team is

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>going to put something together for him in the next.

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.199
<v Speaker 2>Couple of hours. I'll be too busy on holiday.

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:12.599
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder, though, did they do their due diligence

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>with this company, this event's company, because the handler, Raymond,

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>he's come out and he's given a statement to Yahoo

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>News and he said everyone had a fantastic time.

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 2>The snakes look happy, the people look happy. What the

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 2>fuck is wrong with that? I mean, that's.

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Hardly a professional comment, is it. It really makes you think,

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with this company. It doesn't appear that

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Raymond has a great reputation in the industry. He did

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>also tell Yahoo that the snakes are decades old, and

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>he was referencing that to say that they're very comfortable

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 1>interacting with humans. He's taken a lot of care with them.

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>He also says that criticism stems from a misunderstanding about reptiles.

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>He also bizarrely added into the interview that he was

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>recently criticized for taping an animal's mouth shut at a venue. See,

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.319
<v Speaker 1>that's not making things any better. I always wonder how

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>these sorts of controversies end up happening, because surely there

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of people involved in the decision making process.

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>You've got Morgan Waterhouse's pr company, who have clearly pitched

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the idea. Then you've got Two Wrongs and their owners

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that have approved it, particularly when this isn't a new

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>thing in the nightclub space, because back in twenty nineteen,

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a Melbourne nightclub was under investigation for having a live

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>pony inside its venue as part of an opening night promotion.

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Now it's pretty gross because this pony was dressed up

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in a pink cowboy hat and on its back it

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>had the words pony is back bitch written in ink.

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>The RSPCA confirmed at the time that it was investigating

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and so the animals used in performances must be treated

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>with respect and not objectified or subjected to indignity or ridicule.

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>There was also another recent event at Maurice Jones Coo

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>where they featured parrots at the event, and in the past,

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, Ami, we have seen animals appearing at

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>nightclubs in Bali. I just can't believe in twenty twenty

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>three venues think that this is acceptable, particularly for venues

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>like Two Wrongs. You have had a lot of experience

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in the game. They've been in the industry since at

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>least twenty fifteen. Now we touch on the fact that

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Olivia wasn't at this event, But what do you guys

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>think would have happened if she had been pictured with

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>some of these animals, because we have seen recently what

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a battering Emmclair has received after she revealed she'd killed

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:18.079
<v Speaker 1>two cats.

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 2>As a child.

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Maybe she was at the event and just didn't get photographed,

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>because I highly doubt she wouldn't be there to support Morgan.

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>She seems to be at so many events with him recently. Well,

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it looked like she had an event on with another

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>friend that night. Luckily I was watching eagerly on because

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought, oh, maybe she's going to meet up with

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>him after, and I was thinking this would be a

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>terrible look for her because there's so many brands that

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>do not rightfully want to be connected with any sort

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of animal cruelty. The ironic thing is that if Morgan

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't dating Olivia, I don't think as many people would

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>have even known about this event, and they wouldn't have

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>seen the images online, and he wouldn't be copying this

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>flag now. Well, for him, he has been a micro

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>influencer for a long time. He has gained a couple

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of extra thousand followers ince it's hard launching his relationship

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>with Olivia, So I think it will be a learning

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>curve for him that what he does is going to

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>make news now, and it is a reflection on his girlfriend, Olivia,

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>who has a big following, so he needs to be

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>careful with what he does. I don't think this has

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with it. I'm not saying it does,

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>but it reflects on her because they're so closely linked.

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>He's become a part of her personal brand. I know,

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's a bit unfair to blame somebody

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>like a living I'm not her boyfriend's action.

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm not blaming her.

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying it reflects on her because she they are

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>so closely linked. I don't think anyone's blaming Olivia here.

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>She didn't even attend the event. But I think it

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting conversation about personal brand and the fact

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that who you choose to date, unfortunately does reflect on

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you when they do something like this.

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Alao is on my forty thousand dollars tennis court.

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>You are confrontational and aggressive. Yeah, all right.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't particularly want to talk to you.

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Because I actually get offended even looking at you down.

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't look Ruby Tuesday Matthews has called out influencer

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>watchdog account dutch Minti for body shaming her. The Byron

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Bay fashion designer revealed she's struggling with her mental health

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and has called for the hate to stop. No, Kate,

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>how did this all start? Well, it's quite clear from

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>following the account dutch Minty that they have some beef

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>with Ruby Tuesday Matthews. They normally are quite balanced with

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>their posts, but it can get very snarky when they

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about Ruby Tuesday Matthews and also Sophie Gwidolin Now.

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>A few weeks back, the account was very vocal about

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>calling out Ruby about her brand's hat promotion, which featured

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a photo of her son that many believed was exploitative.

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>More recently, during a Q and A, they commented on

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Ruby's thin frame and shared a photo of her postpartum

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>weight loss. The account concluded many people are of the

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>opinion she has an eating disorder. Now. Ruby responded to

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>dutch Minty, sharing screenshots from the Q and a. She

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>wrote to the page that constantly bullshits and smears hate

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>against me. You have absolutely no idea what I'm currently

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>going through. I can tell you I'm not okay. I

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>had a baby seven months ago and went back to

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.360
<v Speaker 1>work three days later, packing thousands of orders for our

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>small business that you tried to boycott a week ago.

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Again, I have.

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Been very transparent, seeking help and trying my best. I'm

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>currently working two jobs and looking after three children that

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I have taken one hundred percent of the time for

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.360
<v Speaker 1>reasons I keep private. She then went on to say

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that she receives horrible messages off the back of comments

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and speculation that Dutch Minty makes about her. Ruby also

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>asks a page to stop commenting on the way she

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>looks and said, I understand I'm.

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Very thin due to serious stress.

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>The pictures that you have attached above are right after

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 1>I lost a baby at sixteen weeks. Please leave me alone.

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>She reiterated that she has always been thin, but is

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>currently thinner due to her current life situation. She further

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>explained that as she is the sole provider and primary

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>caregiver for her two children from a previous relationship, she

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the option to take a break. She wrote,

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 1>family therapy is not cheap, pediatricians are not cheap. I

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>need to continue to work, and for me, this is

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>my line of work. She followed up by sharing a

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>photo of her breastfeeding her daughter holiday as she packed

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.719
<v Speaker 1>orders for her business. She wrote, breastfeeding and packing orders,

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>this is what a small business looks like. I just

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>don't understand you. Why you want to rip me down

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>so much, kicking me when I'm down. It literally never

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>stops now. Dutch Minti shared Ruby's response to her feed,

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and she was slammed in the comments section. Many people

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 1>said they were unfollowing the page, while others called for

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.159
<v Speaker 1>dutch Minti to leave Ruby alone. I think it's a

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 1>really interesting topic because we have obviously discussed Ruby Tuesday,

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Matthew's most recent brand controversy. And I think when you

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>open up your life as an influencer, you are inviting

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>people to have opinions about your life. But I do

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.360
<v Speaker 1>think that there is a line, and I don't think

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:53.640
<v Speaker 1>it's anyone's business to speculate on someone's weight. I thought

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty three we will pass commenting on women's bodies.

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of these pages do take it

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>too far sometimes, and I think, as you said, Kate,

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>there is definitely a line, and I know when we

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>discuss topics we're going to talk about, we talk about

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that line, we say no, that's not appropriate. I think

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>there needs to be more management of this because because

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it has this anonymous nature, as we've discussed many times,

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>these people feel like they can say anything without any repercussion.

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>I think these pages also have to take the influencer's

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>mental health on board. Again, it's about discussing the issue,

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>not discussing the person. And it's quite clear that Ruby

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is struggling at the moment. Yes, her brand campaign wasn't it.

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't good, But it doesn't mean it gives people

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>this green light to continue to bully her and comment

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 1>on her weight and her appearance and her mothering. It

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>is interesting to have her behind the scenes perspective of

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 1>the amount of hate that Ruby has received off the

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>back of this page because I think a lot of

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>the time, in particular with the new laws that are

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>coming in place, companies or entities like this, they have

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to manage their comment section to ensure that there's not

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>bullying or her. But you can't control, really if that's

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>going to then generate hate in the DMS. Yeah, and

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I think by dutch Minty adding Ruby's response to the

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Q and A on her feed, she thought she was

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be supported. She thought that that comment section

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>was going to be like, oh, you know, bagging out Ruby,

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>But it was the complete opposite. And I actually found

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that a really positive thing because it shows that people

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>aren't just blindly following these pages, that they are actually

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>challenging what is said on there exactly. And I think

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe some of these page owners might think, oh, wow,

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>everyone's backing one hundred percent what I've saying. I've got

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>tens of thousands of followers, but a lot of them

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 1>are just there for the gossip, and they will turn

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>on the account owner. I also think it's great that

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Ruby was able to humanize herself, and I think that's

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 1>why so many people resonated with that post.

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree.

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the fact that Ruby can humanize herself, whereas

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>this anonymous person on this page can't really humanize themselves.

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why everyone has been sticking up for Ruby,

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think that everyone knows a line has been crossed. Yeah,

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm just a bit over these anonymous accounts wielding so

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>much power.

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm all for them.

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Holding influences to account. But when it comes to bullying

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and directing trolls to influencers, I think enough is enough.

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 2>We will Behave you think yeah?

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes? Gives that? Yet? Yeah?

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm good.

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Sympathy British of it. The Royal Family is experiencing a

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>resurgence of popularity thanks to TikTok. Prior to the coronation,

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>interest in the Royal family was waning, but that appears

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to have changed so interestingly. Twelve days before King Charles's coronation,

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>stats showed in the UK that seventy eight percent of

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>over sixty five's backed the monarchy, or just thirty two

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>percent of eighteen to twenty four year olds did. The

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>survey also revealed more people and not interested in the

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Royal family than interested in them. However, this has all

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>changed so according to The Daily Mirror Royal editor Russell Myers,

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 1>the Royal Family are beginning to appeal to jen Zea's

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>thanks to TikTok, and this could be exactly what they

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 1>need to.

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Keep the crown going.

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and Kate Middleton is a very important part of

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>trying to get the younger generation interested in the Royal family.

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.239
<v Speaker 1>She's been called their secret weapon, and has recently been

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>voted the favorite working royal in a recent opinion poll.

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>It's ironic because we never actually hear Kate Riddleton talking

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>about anything. Sorry, I love Megan and I'm a huge

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Kate Middleton fan. I think that this survey has been

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>done on me, because as soon as the coronation happened,

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>my TikTok feed was full of Kate Middleton and I've

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>eaten it all up.

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 2>I love her.

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>We do hear a talking, we hear talking to the

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 1>people who are waiting in line to greet her, and

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 1>she is lovely. I follow the Prince and Princess of

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Wales on Instagram and their pr team has done an

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 1>amazing job. That videography job. I'm actually so jealous. I

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>would love to do that, but they're always showing Kate.

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>She's like she was playing the piano the other day,

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 1>or that was a good shot. She looks so elegant

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 1>playing the piano.

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 2>And also I.

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 1>Really like the fact that she takes her own photo,

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 1>so she's really interested for two ptography, so she's always

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.120
<v Speaker 1>taking the photos of the kids for their birthday. Yeah,

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it was this more human side that we're seeing on

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>social media, and the Royals are definitely booming on TikTok.

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>The hashtag royals has over six billion views. The Daily Mail,

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 1>who are members of the Royal row to have even

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>launched their own specific royal TikTok called Daily Mail Royals,

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 1>where they share all their Royal news. And this explosion

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of Royal content on TikTok started with the death of

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Queen Elizabeth and intensified with King Charles's coronation. It's quite

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 1>funny because there's TikTokers who have now become really influential

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>voices on the Royals, like twenty eight year old American

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Amanda Matter. So Amanda has one point two million subscribers

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and it was at the forefront of TikTok's coronation coverage. Yeah,

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I am loving all this content. I've seen them popping

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>up on Snapchat as well. I wasn't just sure if

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 1>that's because of my algorithm, but it seems like a

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are also enjoying this content. And this

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.199
<v Speaker 1>is where jen Zetta's are discovering old news, rumors and

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>scandals about the royal family that they never knew about.

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>It the stuff that we grew up with. I actually

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>think it started during the coronation because a lot of

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 1>people were searching Princess Diana on there and there were

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of TikTok saying this is our real queen,

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and then as soon as you're interested in her, then

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you're like, what's the new Princess of Wales doing? What

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 1>was she like? Yeah, well, there's a couple of videos

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that are really going viral on TikTok. Of course, there

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>are the Diana videos of her interview with Martin Bashier

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>back in nineteen ninety five, and there's also this video

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 1>of Diana.

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you've seen it. She's running a.

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:34.199
<v Speaker 1>Race at Prince Harry's school. It's absolutely iconic. People are

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>loving the cake content as well, particularly videos of her

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>before she got married to Prince William. They're the party picks,

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>aren't they, of them all out at the night club.

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I've also seen poor Prince William. They keep showing this

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:47.679
<v Speaker 1>photo of him of what he would look like if

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 1>he got his teeth and hair.

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 2>I've seen that he looks hot.

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. People are apparently fawning over the younger days of

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Prince William as well as Prince Edward I didn't realize

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>he was okay looking back in the day.

0:24:58.119 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 2>Do you know what also you failed.

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>To make is Louie. Everyone's obsessed with creating tiktoks of

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>him having meltdones as well. I think Louis is great

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for their brand because it makes Kate Middleton look human.

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>All moms can relate to having this annoying child that's

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 1>not behaving. It's annoying, He's just a normal kid, and

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's humanizing the whole Royal family. He is

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>being framed as the new Prince Harry a bit of

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a character. But Princess Charlotte is also hugely popular because

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people have realized how much she actually

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 1>resembles Princess Diana. I saw her side, I went viral.

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Everyone was saying it's the Princess Diana's side because it

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>looked like she did it to Charles and Camilla.

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 2>See.

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>When I see all of this stuff on TikTok, I

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>think there's no way that the Royal Family aren't going

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to be relevant moving forward. I do feel a little

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 1>bit uncomfortable about the intense interest in the younger members

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of the royal family, though, especially in this TikTok era.

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, imagine them going to school like Princess Charlotte

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and George and Louie. People are gonna whip out their

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>phones like they're going to be doing tiktoks about every move.

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>The thing that's concerning from reading Prince Harry's book is

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that the media create characters for the children which might

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>clearly not apply to them. So Harry grew up being

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the naughty boy, so he almost took on that persona.

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 2>So with Louis, he's a three.

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Or four year old kid, and we're already saying, oh,

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be the naughty one. He's going to

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 1>be the one getting with all the girls, like he

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know himself yet. How do you know yourself in

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 1>that environment? He's going to go back. I mean all

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>kids have phones now. When he's twelve, we're probably looking

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 1>all these articles thinking, Okay, this is what the media

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>expects me, this is what the public think I am.

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be that. They've almost framed Princess Charlotte

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>as like a Hermione character because she's always telling George

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>what to do, and I mean it is entertaining, But

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>my concern is what about when they go to school.

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 1>The royal children are protected by certain guidelines in place

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 1>with the press so they aren't hounded by paparazzi. But

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 1>now with the popularity of social media, everyone is a

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>journalist and you can't prevent the general public from filming

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>them or kids at school filming them. So the royal

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>family are going to have to think about how they

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 1>manage this scenario moving forward. Well, I think that's all

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 1>we've got time for today. Thank you so much for

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>listening to another episode of Outspoken. If you have enjoyed it,

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>could you please make sure you are subscribed on Apple

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>podcast and also Spotify, and we will be dropping part

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:15.120
<v Speaker 1>two of our deep dive into Mitch Orwill on tomorrow's show.

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>This podcast was recorded on the traditional land of the

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Ghana people of the Adelaide Plains. We pay respect to

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 1>elders past and present.